Scribe Template OLC CollaborateKansas City General Session Topic Innovation and Regulation Date: Feb. 24, 2015 Break Out Session Question Can and should regulations drive innovative change in higher education? Number of Attendees: 48 Scribe Brian Gumm Facilitator Chris LeBeau 9:45a-10:00a: Marshall Hill (MH hereafter) Answering the breakout session question Quick answer: No Regulation needs to allow for innovation, and follow practice not set up roadblocks Questions from group: ○ “Extending reciprocity amongst higher ed institutions can we have a smorgasbord of best courses from multiple institutions, tailored to the student’s program?” ■ MH re: SARA doesn’t go to that level lacking the component that SARA has (acrosstheboard institutional support); institutions still have territoriality/protective attitude. ○ “Still fuzzy on what SARA does. Are all online programs covered by one fee (paid to SARA)? Can we now market to all those states?” ■ MH re: Yes, to every other SARAaffiliated state; no additional fees in those states; Caveat: professional programs that lead to professional licensure that licensure is overseen by separate board, and fees may still apply w/ that body. ○ “From Nursing perspective: Does the physical presence clause still apply?” ■ MH re: That’s been the most difficult detail to work out in SARA; experiential learning is important to students, based on at least 20 years of studies; so it’s important for a group like SARA to ensure that level of engagement; negotiated compromise on this requirement that there’s no ■ universal agreement on; SARA provides for online programs some “safe spots” for student placement w/out triggering “physical presence” clause; referencing FAQs on this topic on NCSARA. Followup question on other clauses, e.g. “operating a business” clause 10:00a-10:20a: Chris LeBeau (CL hereafter) Key points/topics from table discussions ○ Table 1: States creating what are essentially trade barriers for students to enroll in a program outofstate; conflict of interest in granting credit to another institution’s courses (forgoing income) Gaining more students, but losing out on some revenue? ■ Offhand comment favoring “open market” perspective ○ Table 2: Progress/benefits that Cali College has made; sharing where other schools are at w/ SARA; Emporia State’s (KS) model instate satellite campuses in other states ○ Table 3: Question of resource sharing across institutions & states, e.g. library resources w/ limitations from providers/vendors; can SARA facilitate collective bargaining for services? ○ Table 4: SARAclarification questions; recommending the good resources on the NCSARA website; making sure regulations actually do protect from illegitimate orgs ○ Table 5: What is “innovation?” Where: Classroom, marketplace, etc.? What are SARA’s next steps once all states sign up? ○ Table 6: What to do when a student from a nonSARA state wants to enroll in your national, SARAaffiliated program? Best practices for communication? With 710 minutes remaining, scribe will ask the following questions of attendees: Key Takeaways: ● Lots of questions re: implementation Need for more clarity. ● Should regulation drive innovation? Diversity in perspectives: yes and no. ○ One person in the affirmational camp: “(Regulations) should be the ‘protective layer’.” ○ One from the negative camp: Innovation needs to happen, and then put controls/regulations put in place. ■ Metaphor: The success of the Internet was partly due to regulation being delayed while rapid and expansive innovation took place. ● Opportunities Person coming from China, impressed with the “smorgasbord” of schools that have strengths to offer; not the case in her home country. What Else is Important to Capture Here? ● A few references to the quality of the materials on the NCSARA website Questions for Follow Up in Facebook Group: ● ● Where is the voice of the students in any of these conversations? Issues of professional licensure still a big question/concern Next Steps: ● Having SARA do more webinars
© Copyright 2024