Components of an Investigative Case-‐Based Learning Module The Case with Title This is the case or scenario itself. It defines the problem space through a story about people set in a situation, facing decisions or dilemmas. It might be written as a newspaper story, a letter, a conversation, or other narrative. Shorter is better usually Case Analysis The process you would like students to use to identify issues and questions of interest to them. A “Know/Want to Know” chart is useful here. Learning Goals What are the major ideas, skills and or values you expect students to obtain as they work through this case module? Link these to activities and assessments. Investigations and Activities: Linking Cyberlearning to ICBL Consider the types of investigations that might be linked with your case. These could be things you already do. Or, they could be new elements proposed by students or supplied by you. Investigations can be built around online resources that you want students to use (Cyberlearning). These might include interactive simulations, multiple animations, interactive maps, data sets, remote monitoring information, tools like Gapminder, Worldmapper or ImageJ, research websites like the European Bioinformatics Institute, Google Earth, or images Describe at least one specific lab, online, or field exercise, simulation or investigative activity that would be useful for your students to do and relates to the case objectives. Resources What resources, in addition to the ones forming the basis of the investigation, might students use?You might also include resources not online, such as readings, texts, classroom maps, graphs, data sets, software, access to experts, photographs, etc., etc., etc. Include the kinds of resources you expect students to use. Student Products What products or artifacts do you want students to produce? These will likely be something you assess, so students will focus their learning toward completing these. Examples might include: lab reports, briefing papers, presentations, web pages, pamphlets, experimental designs, recommendations, or simply the Know-‐ Want to Know chart. Assessment How will you evaluate the students’ products and process. Consider how you will evaluate the artifacts. You may need to develop a scoring guide (rubric). Also consider how you will assess the other elements of case-‐based learning, such as student collaboration, the initial case analysis, questions asked, resources accessed, investigation planned, etc. Implementation Suggest how you will use the case with your students, number of days, time of the semester, etc. Credits: List photo credits and any other references to information you have used in developing this module. Margaret Waterman and Ethel Stanley ©2005 http://bioquest.org/lcbl NIE 2015 17-‐UP An Investigative Case-Based Problem Space on Water Cycle The Case Narrative, w ith Title Stranded by Jag, W oon, Sum athi and Zahrah A mother and daughter were shipwrecked on an island off Indonesia. They had no form of communication or electricity. After the third day, their water supply was used up. However, the mother and daughter were found alive one week later by Police Coast Guards. During an interview, after being rescued, the daughter exclaimed “ It was all thanks to Mother Nature and my mother’s handy luggage that we were able to survive”. Margaret Waterman and Ethel Stanley ©2005 http://bioquest.org/lcbl NIE 2015 17-‐UP CASE ANALYSIS 1. Potential issues and major topics: • Water cycle • Evaporation • Condensation • Living things need clean water • Perseverance • Family bonding • Survival skills What do I know? Water cycle No clean water available What do I need to know? How do I collect clean water? LEARNING GOALS To understand and apply the concept of water cycle in order to get clean water for drinking. INVESTIGATIONS AND ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING CYBERLEARNING RESOURCES Margaret Waterman and Ethel Stanley ©2005 http://bioquest.org/lcbl NIE 2015 17-‐UP Pupils are given 3 scenarios where they are to design a model /proposal to get clean water. Possible scenarios: The mother and daughter can explore the island and get to 3 places where they can build their model/proposal. The 3 places are o sandy beach, o near a river with muddy water o Forest with inedible fruits and leaves. ACTIVITIES: • • • • • • • • Each group to choose only 1 scenario. Pupils to design a model/proposal to get clean water with the given resources based on the chosen scenario. Upload picture of model/proposal together with a short description into Edmodo. Peer evaluation using rubric. After feedback from peers, group can make changes and improve their model/proposal. Build model/proposal. Design a poster with detailed explanation on how the model/proposal works. Scientific concept of the water cycle must be clearly presented. RESOURCES: Plastic sheets Empty 1.5 litres and 500 ml water bottles Duct tape scissors STUDENT PRODUCTS 1. Proposal Template 2. A model to get fresh water supply 3. Poster ASSESSMENT Rubric for Model/proposal and poster Peer Evaluation on Edmodo https://www.edmodo.com/home#/group?id=13222473 Margaret Waterman and Ethel Stanley ©2005 http://bioquest.org/lcbl NIE 2015 17-‐UP IMPLEMENTATION Creating the working model and poster presentation to peers. Credits: Margaret Waterman and Ethel Stanley ©2005 http://bioquest.org/lcbl NIE 2015 17-‐UP Proposal Template PROJECT STRANDED LOCATION: _______________ NAME of survivors [Team Members]: 1. _______________ 2. _______________ 3. _______________ 4. _______________ Explanation Checklist: Does my proposal have labels? Is it scientifically correct? Did I apply my concepts correctly? Does it look appealing? Please tick Rubrics for Stranded Project - RR Understanding of concept Advanced understanding Good understanding Understanding can be improved Application of concept Concepts have been applied very well Have shown attempts to apply concept No signs of application Practicality of concept ( Useable) Very Creative, can be used in real life scenario Has limited use Not possible to real life be used in real scenario life scenario Aesthetics Well organized, neat and appealing Looks pleasant and some levels of organisation Untidy, no organisation. Peer evaluation Poster - Stranded Project Rubrics for proposal Of Stranded Project NIE 2012 Alignment between the case module “Racing Rosie” and the MOE 21st Century Skills 1. Civic Literacy, Global Awareness & Cross-‐cultural Skills 2. Critical and Inventive Thinking 3. Information and Communication Skills Part of Case Module for ICBL Case Narrative Case Analysis: Know/Need to Know Resources for answering questions Explore case resources Experiment Find one new resource Alignment with 21st Century skills Read aloud, read silently. (3)Pupils need to comprehend text and are communicating through expressive reading. Individual and group thinking (2) &(3)Pupils have to work about what you already know, collaboratively to determine and question generation. the problem in the story and relate it to scientific concepts through thinking analytically. Generate a list of resources. (2) Pupils have to assess what they need to know and make a decision on choice of suitable resources to use. Examine the things we offered (2) Pupils check on resources and evaluate it to see if it is relevant. Relationship management – pupils have to work with others to resolve issues amicably. They also provide assistance to fellow group members. Groups designed and (3) Team members conducted experiments collaborative to complete the project. (2) Team members carry out tests to check hypothesis and offer possible explanation if incorrect. (2 & 3)Pupils consolidate findings and learning by making poster and then present to the class. Pupils do peer evaluation and offer suggestions or ask questions. Googled and…sent to Ethel via email Action by Participants 23-‐UP NIE 2012 1. Civic Literacy, Global Awareness & Cross-‐cultural Skills 2. Critical and Inventive Thinking 3. Information and Communication Skills 23-‐UP
© Copyright 2024