How to overcome the gap between ISO 9000: 2000 and Total Quality Management - exemplified at a medium sized production company Alexander Fliess Mini research report presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business Administration at the University of Stellenbosch Supervisor: Mr Konrad von Leipzig Degree of confidentiality: A Graduation: December 2007 ii Declaration of own work Herby I, Alexander H. Fliess, declare that this study project is my own original work and that all sources have been accurately reported and acknowledged, and that this document has not previously in its entirely or in part been submitted at any university in order to obtain an academic qualification. Alexander Fliess 29 October 2007 iii Abstract Globalisation has changed markets significantly. In order to maintain and improve competitiveness it is generally agreed among executives that the quality of products and services is essential (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: iii). In order to strive for higher quality, organisations have chosen different paths to achieve this goal. Several years ago on of the most discussed topics was the DIN EN 9001 certification. Thousands of organisations have taken this step towards quality management and are certified today. The DIN EN 9001 became the global standard, and there are markets were companies are not abele to operate without this certification anymore. Some companies have profited greatly from the introduction of ISO 9000, because for the first time a quality management system (QMS) was introduced. It initiated significant restructuring programs. Consequently, processes were streamlined and organisations became more transparent. But many companies still do not “live” the concept, but instead and only show relevant paperwork to the external certification body in order to obtain the certificate. Even more particularly companies, which live the QMS face the question of which concepts are suitable to not only further improve quality and productivity but also to generate long-term sustainable business success. For these companies Total Quality Management (TQM) can be a very promising concept. Although the concept of TQM already dates back several decades it became very popular recently. TQM is a concept that puts quality in the centre of all aspects. Its principles encompass the involvement of all employees, and it strives for long-term customer satisfaction. TQM is based on continuous improvement and focuses on sustainable achievements. The objectives of this approach are not only long-term business success but also benefits for the individual employees and the society. Therefore TQM can be considered as one of the most far-reaching quality concepts existing today. The Fliess Company is a medium sized production company for welding wires. In 2001 Fliess introduced the IS0 9001: 2000. It has taken the company several years to fully live the QMS, after it mainly introduced it only to satisfy customers’ requirements of the certification. Today the processes are aligned in accordance with ISO 9001: 2000 and the company lives the QMS. But as a producer of very iv specialised premium products, management realised that it needed continuing on in order to maintain the competitive advantage. Therefore Fliess is busy at present implementing TQM. There are various areas of applying TQM at Fliess. The main focus lies on further improving customer satisfaction through continuous improvement and special attention is paid to the involvement of the individual employee. But TQM needs to be implemented in a very careful way to prevent a failure. Organisational changes must be supervised closely by top management. If top management is not fully committed and does not fully support the implementation in both the short and long term it can be very frustrating for the employees, and the implementation will not only fail but might even have negative effects, too. v Opsomming Globalisasie het markte geweldig verander. Ten einde kompeterendheid te behou en te bevorder is bestuurders dit eens dat hoë kwaliteit van produkte en dienste noodsaaklik is (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: iii). Maatskappye volg verskillende roetes in die strewe na hoë kwaliteit, en hierdie ondersoek fokus op hoofkonsepte rakende kwaliteit en kwaliteitsbestuur. ’n Tydjie terug was die bespreking van “sertifisering” hoog op die agenda van enige kwaliteitsforum. Maatskappye het groot baat gevind met die bekendstelling van ISO 9000, waar daar vir die eerste keer ’n kwaliteitsbestuur program ingestel is. Dit het tot grootskaalse maatskappy verandering en proses herstrukturering gelei, en maatskappye in geheel het meer deursigtig geword. Duisende maatskappye het die stap geneem en is vandag gesertifiseer. Die DIN EN ISO 9000 het die globale standaard geword, en daar is markte waar maatskappye sonder diè sertifisering nie langer besigheid kan beoefen nie. Daar is egter steeds maatskappye wat nie regtig die stelsel “uitleef” nie, maar bloot sertifisering soek omdat kliënte dit vereis – nie omdat hulle self dit wil toepas nie. Selfs maatskappye wat die stelsels ten volle inkorporeer het staan egter voor die uitdaging van hoe hulle kwaliteit verder kan verbeter en op langtermyn ’n suksesvolle onderneming kan verseker. Vir baie van die maatskappye is Totale Kwaliteitbestuur (Total Quality Management - TQM) ’n belowende konsep. Alhoewel TQM konsepte reeds ’n hele aantal jare terug ontwikkel is, geniet dit huidiglik ’n nuwe oplewing. TQM plaas kwaliteit in die middelpunt van aktiwiteite, insluitende die volledige betrekking van werknemers en langtermyn kliënte tevredenheid. TQM is baseer op kontinuë verbetering en fokus op volhoubaarheid. Die doelwitte sluit in nie net langtermyn besigheidsukses in nie, maar ook voordele vir individuële werknemers en die samelewing in geheel. Dus kan TQM gesien word as een van die mees omvattende kwaliteitskonsepte wat huidiglik bestaan. Die ontwikkeling en toepassing van die konsepte soos bo beskryf word in hierdie verslag voorgestel en uitgelig aan die hand van die Fliess Maatskappy, ’n medium grootte vervaardigingsmaatskappy van sweisdrade. In 2001 het Fliess die ISO 9001:2000 standaard begin implementeer. Dit het ’n hele aantal jare geneem vi voordat die stelsel volledig benut is, nadat dit aanvanklik bloot op grond van kliëntevereistes ingestel is. Vandag kan daar met trots gesê word dat alle prosesse in lyn is met die sertifiseringsvereistes, en die maatskappy “lewe” die ISO 9001:2000 standaard. Bestuur besef egter die noodsaaklikheid om verder te ontwikkel en aan te pas in die hoogs kompeterende omgewing ten einde hulle kompeterende voordeel nie net te behou nie maar uit te bou. Daarom is Fliess besig om TQM beginsels verder uit te brei en in verskillende areas te implementeer om sodoende kliënte tevredenheid te verhoog – dit word gedoen deur veral deurlopende verbetering en die betrokkenheid van elke individuële werknemer. vii Table of Contents Page Declaration of own work ii Abstract iii Opsomming v Table of Contents vii List of Figures: ix List of Tables: ix List of Appendices: x Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Total Quality Management 3 2.1 History of Total Quality Management 3 2.2 Definition of Total Quality Management 4 2.3 The Principles of Total Quality Management 6 2.3.1 Quality Orientation as main company objective 6 2.3.2 Commitment of the Top Management 9 2.3.3 Leadership Development 10 2.3.4 Employee Involvement 11 2.3.5 Customer Orientation 13 2.3.6 Supplier Integration 15 2.3.7 Continuous Improvement (Kaizen) 16 2.3.8 Benchmarking 19 2.3.9 Lean Production 21 2.3.10 Preventive Measures 22 2.4 Management of Process Quality 24 2.5 Quality Cost and TQM 26 2.6 The European Quality Award 29 Chapter 3: Quality Management Systems 31 3.1 International Organisation for Standardisation 31 3.2 ISO 9000: Series 32 3.2.1 ISO 9000: 2000 33 3.2.2 ISO 9001: 2000 34 3.2.3 ISO 9004: 2000 34 viii 3.2.4 Scope of ISO 9000: 2000 Series 35 3.3 Reasons to implement ISO 9000 Series 35 3.4 Quality Management Principles in ISO 9000 Series 36 3.5 Structure and Requirements of the QMS Standard 37 3.5.1 Management Responsibility 38 3.5.2 Resource Management 39 3.5.3 Product Realisation 39 3.5.4 Measurement, Analysis and Improvement 40 3.6 Limitations of the ISO 9000 family 41 Chapter 4: TQM based on ISO 9000: 2000 43 Chapter 5: The Company 45 5.1 Company Description 45 5.2 Reasons to implement ISO 9000 Standard 46 5.3 Implementation of ISO 9001: 2000 47 5.4 Possible fields of development within the area of TQM 48 5.4.1 Quality awareness 49 5.4.2 Commitment of Management 50 5.4.3 Leadership Development 51 5.4.4 Employee Participation 52 5.4.5 Customer Orientation 53 5.4.6 Supplier Integration 57 5.4.7 Continuous Improvement (Kaizen) 58 5.4.8 Benchmarking 59 5.4.9 Lean Production 60 5.4.10 Preventive Measures 61 5.5 Management of Process Quality 63 Chapter 6: Implementation of TQM at the Fliess Company 64 6.1 Potential drawbacks of TQM 64 6.2 Improvements 65 Chapter 7: Conclusion and Recommendations 67 List of Sources 69 Appendices 72 ix List of Figures: Figure 2.1: The old attitude Figure 2.2: The New Attitude Figure 2.3: Leadership Style Figure 2.4: The Customer / Supplier Network Figure 2.5: Relationship between suppliers processes and customers Figure 2.6: P.D.C.A. Cycle Figure 2.7: Example of Isikawa / Fishbone Diagram Figure 2.8: Total Quality costs Figure 2.9: The EFQM Model List of Tables: Table 3.1: Overview of ISO 9000: 2000 family x List of Appendices: Appendix A: Schematical Illustration of the Production Appendix B: New Fliess Box 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION In recent years internal and external general condition in businesses have been strongly characterised by globalisation tendencies. The globalisation of businesses is influenced by a better education level and improved technology, which opened communication, transport and travel to everyone (Levitt, 1983: 92). This has changed markets significantly and resulted in increased competition for most of the organisations. Therefore in today’s globalised and fast changing and consequently highly competitive business environment, organisations focus on customer satisfaction in order to gain a competitive advantage. Under these conditions, topmanagers search for new methods to break up existing structures and to take future demands into account. In today’s business environment the competitive situation of organisations is highly influenced by the strategic implication of quality. Therefore one major strategic change that takes place is that organisations consider achieving higher customer satisfaction through an emphasis on the quality of products and services (Magd & Curry, 2003: 244). Among other concepts Quality Management Systems (QMS) and Total Quality Management (TQM) are the most commonly accepted approaches to improving quality. Without any QMS in place it is nearly impossible for companies to determine how well or badly they perform. The QMS takes the whole organisational structure into account and encompasses all quality relevant documentations including measurement and analysis. Currently the ISO 9000: 2000 family is perceived as the established global standard for an effective QMS (Beckford, 2002: 221). This standard can be certified by recognised external parties. The Japanese inspired Total Quality Management is a special approach to improved effectiveness of company performance. The fundamental thought is that quality cannot only be seen as a mechanistic process but has to be accepted as a company pervading system. Companies using TQM to search for a high level of quality, consider the customer as the key element. They realise that they have to offer the highest possible quality level of products and services in order to achieve and exceed 2 customer satisfaction. TQM provides various techniques, which secure the acceptance of this philosophy within the entire organisation and facilitate the necessary changes of behaviour and mentality. This thesis focuses on the theoretical background of the ISO 9000 family and TQM and points out the relationship between both. Particularly the move from an implemented ISO: 9000 series to TQM is examined and exemplified at a medium sized production company that implemented ISO 9000: 2000 in the year 2001. 3 CHAPTER 2 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 2.1 History of Total Quality Management The term quality dates back more than 2000 years. The Latin word “qualitas” already means the characteristics of an object (Stowasser, Petsching & Skutsch, 1980: 376).1 Therefore the discussion of its connotation is as old as the term. The movement of companies towards quality in the sense of Total Quality Management (TQM) dates back to the early twenties century when Dr Shewhart firstly introduced Statistical Process Control in order to monitor quality in the manufacturing of mass products (Magd & Curry, 2003: 246). As global business conditions changed significantly after World War II, the issue quality prevailed more and more. Companies tried not only to obtain customer satisfaction but also to exceed customer’s expectations. In order to achieve or maintain competitiveness, TQM as a philosophy and respective concepts have been developed (Eom & Stought, 1995: 28). Although the new quality concepts from the 1950s and 1960s were firstly developed in the USA, they did not find broad acceptance and were not put in practice in the USA (von Ahsen, 1996: 22). At that time Japanese industry desperately needed an improvement of product quality. Deming was the first to introduce TQM in Japan. Deming convinced Japanese leaders that the country could compete on world markets within five years (Kemp, 2006: 179). The Japanese economy adopted some of these new ideas and achieved competitiveness within five years (Kemp, 2006: 181). Only in the 1970s America learned from the Japanese and the knowledge was re-imported due to the impressive success of the Japanese economy (von Ahsen, 1996: 28). The Americans focused on quality concepts in the 1980s and soon other Western industrial countries also realised that the Japanese factories were organised in a far more efficient way than it was usual in the Western world (von Ahsen, 996: 46). At this time the Japanese were able to offer high quality products at a favourable price and exerted pressure on the international market. Therefore concepts like training programs in quality control were built up and 1 Latin translation into German: „Beschaffenheit eines Gegenstandes“ eng.: condition of an object 4 continuous quality improvement projects were established in the 1980s and 1990s (von Ahsen, 1996: 48). Total quality management as we understand it today dates back two decades but is still primarily based on the core ideas of W. Eduard Deming, Joseph Juran, Philip Crosby, [Feigenbaum], and Kaoru Ishikawa (Sousa & Voss, 2002: 91). 2.2 Definition of Total Quality Management Before defining TQM an overview of the definitions of quality will be given. The concepts and vocabulary of quality are numerous and quality is interpreted differently by different people (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: 97). The norm ISO 8402: 1994, which has been replaced in 2000 by the Norm ISO 9000 defines quality as “the totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs”. Nevertheless there are several definitions, which have been made by various writers pre-dating the ISO Norm (Fox, 1994: 4): “Quality is fitness for purpose or use” (Juran). “The total composite product and service characteristics of marketing, engineering, manufacture and maintenance through which the product and service in use will meet the expectation by the customer” (Feigenbaum). “Conformance to requirements or specifications” (Crosby). Fox (1994: 5) further suggests considering the definitions together as they are complementary. Each one emphasises a particular point that is only implicit in the others. Juran underlines the totality of quality considerations. They together satisfy all the needs. Feigenbaum mentions the key divisions of organisation that play a critical role in the achievement of quality as well. Further he mentions the customer, whose needs should be addressed. Crosby’s definition implies the possibility of 5 documenting and measuring. Today these definitions must be seen as a historical development and the basis of topical definitions. Nowadays the focus on quality goes far beyond the finished product. In order to reach the desired level of quality for products and services a systematic approach of TQM is followed by many companies. TQM is considered as a concept and a chance for sustainable improvement of products and services. Dean and Bowen (1994: 393) have given a broad definition of Quality Management as “a philosophy or an approach to management made up of a set of mutually reinforcing principles, each of which is supported by set practices and techniques”. Further Jeffries, Evans & Raynolds (1996: 15) define TQM more precise as “a comprehensive and integrated way of managing any organisation in order to meet the needs of the customers consistently and achieve continuous improvement in every aspect of the organisation’s activities”. From this definition the objective criteria of TQM can be derived, which are customer and co-worker satisfaction, benefits for society, quality, time and costs. TQM is the most comprehensive strategy a company can apply. Therefore it is indispensable to formulate quality principles, which provide a guideline and secure a uniform proceeding. Total Quality Management is a management strategy, which influences the entire organisation with all its activities, employees and its environment. The application of this tool helps to determine customer orientated quality goals. Over the past few decades, quality “gurus” such as Deming (1986), Juran (Juran and Gryna, 1993), Crosby (1979), Feigenbaum (1991), and Ishikawa (1985), the primary authorities of total quality management, have developed certain propositions in the field of TQM, which have gained significant acceptance throughout the world. Their insights provide a good understanding of the TQM philosophy, principles, and practices. 6 2.3 The Principles of Total Quality Management The identified concept of TQM is based on the works from quality “gurus”. Their propositions are the foundation for understanding the concept of TQM. In theory these “Gurus” provide different solutions on the first sight when it comes to the improvement within organisations. However, Professor John Oakland, who also can be seen as an authority in the field of Total Quality Management, deals with the different approaches by suggesting “they are all talking the same “language”, but they use different dialects” (Oakland, 2003:). The following subsections present the main principles and practices of TQM proposed by these quality “gurus”. 2.3.1 Quality Orientation as main company objective The attitude towards quality has changed significantly throughout the time. Hereinafter the different approaches – the old and the new attitude – will be highlighted. The old attitude In the past the majority of companies focused only on product quality. Therefore the output of the system was controlled. At this late stage inspection could only find variations and nothing could be done to correct the variation, as it had already occurred (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: 96). The whole quality development process was not taken into account. It was also a widespread belief that quality represents a counterpart to productivity. Higher quality was related to a lower level of productivity. 7 Figure 2.1: The old attitude QUALITY PRODUCTIVITY Source: Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 11 The new attitude In contrast to the old attitude of product inspection the modern philosophy concentrates on process control (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: 97). The new attitude assumes that better quality of the processes means less repairs, less waste, fewer mistakes and thus higher productivity. The new direction concentrates much more on the quality of the processes and assumes that high product quality is always a result of excellent process quality. This implies that all processes have to be controlled consistently and have to work without any defects. In order to match process definition with the concept of TQM, Omachonu & Ross (1994: 97) suggest that the process shall begin with the concept of a product idea, enclose the whole life-cycle and even take the phase out into account. Quality is the key to productivity, and a higher quality level means less costs. The traditional conflict between quality, cost and time is removed. The new thinking clarifies that quality is the key to productivity. Higher process quality brings about (Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 12): 8 • Higher machine load factor • Shorter material throughput times • Lower inventories • Higher product quality • Less scrap and rework Figure 2.2: The New Attitude Source: Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 12 Costs, time and quality are no longer contradictory. As cost and time have become a characteristic of quality, the conflict between the three former objectives does not exist any more. With the removal of the contradiction between cost, time and quality, quality can be considered as the highest strategic objective of the company. 9 This new attitude has to be dispread within the entire company and it provides the basis for all other principles. 2.3.2 Commitment of the Top Management The introduction of Total Quality Management is a strategic decision, which leads to a change of the entire organisational structure of an organisation. In order to avoid uncertainty and resistance of employees and executives, the necessary changes have to be directed and pushed by top management. The management has to perform its executive function and has to support the changing process by an exemplary behaviour and activities, which are recognised throughout the company. It is essential that top management demonstrates the commitment to quality (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: 32 - 33). The basis for the implementation of TQM can only be built up if the management strives in the strongest possible way for quality and supports this with consequent proceeding. All changes have to be initiated by the senior management. It is important that employees in leading positions are not able to prevent or slow down necessary actions and support the dedication to TQM. This principle goes along with the theory of Philip B. Crosby, who assumes that within the management a core of quality specialists has to be created in order to spread the quality improvement approach throughout the organisation. This “TopDown” approach is strongly supported by Crosby. Consequently senior management holds the entire responsibility for quality insurance (Crosby, 1984: 68–75). For realising TQM, top management has to play a central position. Without management’s commitment no far reaching changes can be implemented. The issue of quality therefore cannot be delegated to a TQM-coordinator or manager, because they do not have the required authority or acceptance within the organisation (Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 18). It is important that the whole top management is convinced and that they do not act contradictory to each other. Therefore top management has to communicate and assist the implementation of the company’s vision and mission actively, they develop the fundamental values and 10 systems and in times of change they act in a constant manner in order to achieve the aim (Zink, 2004: 76). 2.3.3 Leadership Development TQM is a management method, which is based on the co-operation of all members of an organisation. Leadership has to be created in a way that gives everybody the possibility to be actively involved in the company (Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 33). It is the individual person who achieves quality objectives, it is not the organisation itself (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: 26). Therefore, it is the duty of the leaders to develop an effective work environment that encourages the creativity and the productivity of all employees. A central core culture with a sound basis of values must be established (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: 32). In order to use the full potential of all employees, teamwork is essential. Leaders must be prepared for this kind of co-operation. Social competencies like communication skills, empathy, creativity, personality and an exemplary behaviour become the core of leadership (Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 25). The organisation should introduce an executive development program that improves the methodical and the social competences of quality-orientated leadership. It is essential to offer learning opportunities, which are especially directed towards quality techniques and quality management systems. Additionally proficiency in group presentations and discussion management should be further developed. 11 Figure 2.3: Leadership Style Source: Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 30 The aim is to form leaders with an excellent quality understanding (methodical competence) combined with social leadership competences. 2.3.4 Employee Involvement Every single member of staff is a significant potential for creativity and problem solving. Consequently a work environment has to be created, which allows to leverage the full potential. According to Kamiske, the following points build the foundation for a successful implementation of TQM (Kamiske, 1996: 50): The preventive quality strategy of TQM requires the commitment of all people, who are involved in the process. Only then, possible mistakes can be realised and eliminated in an early stage. The orientation of all members of staff on quality and continuous improvement builds the core element of all activities. 12 Flexibility and adaptability concerning customer demands can only be reached with the help of good trained employees who are able to think entrepreneurial. All members on all levels of the organisation have to acquire a basic knowledge of the main TQM principles. This can be done with the help of training facilities. Additionally employees should work in teams and develop an appropriate application of the principles in their work area. Methods of involving employees are for example team building, employee suggestion systems and quality cycles. Team Building For the objective “Quality”, employee involvement in teams influences the results positively due to motivation and productivity. Simplifying the theory of motivation, it can be shown that the membership of a team is an effective motivational device that can lead to improved quality (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: 169). The productivity in teams rises because of better motivation, better communication and fewer overlaps (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: 169). In order to support group work, the strict division of labour has to be abolished. New work contents have to be created and groups with a high degree of self-responsibility have to be formed. Particularly cross - functional teams allow a systematical approach that includes objectives of the company and the team (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: 170). Employee suggestion system An employee suggestion system can be a very useful tool within TQM. It must be designed in a way that individual employees or teams are encouraged to improve quality. The system must rather be an improvement system than just a collection of proposals. It must support improvements immediately. The suggestion system 13 becomes a service station that picks up ideas and allocates the appropriate resources immediately (Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 39). Quality Circles Quality circles are groups composed of workers who regularly meet to discuss ways of improving the quality of their work. Normally this takes place on a voluntary base during working time or after work. Improvements in safety, product design and/or in manufacturing process are typical topics (Juran, 1992: 396-397). Engagements in quality circles exposes circle members to valuable experience, which is reached by the communication with colleagues, collective problem solving and sharing the findings not only within one cycle but also among cycles (Kemp, 2006: 255). 2.3.5 Customer Orientation A key factor in TQM is a focus on the customer throughout the whole organisation. This has to include the internal and external customers alike (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: 166). External customer In order to achieve or maintain competitiveness, a company must continuously determine the requirements of the customer, the eventual buyer of the product or service. Therefore customer focus seems to be obvious although many companies are still focused on the quality of the products in the most basic term. They try to make the product work (Wadsworth, Stephens & Godfrey, 2002: 90). But in recent years manager became more and more aware of quality in a broader sense and that is one of the most important product features for the customers. That means that a product only will survive in the market, if it meets market demands and works without any problems. It has become the customer and not the organisation 14 who defines what quality is. The customer satisfaction becomes the most important goal (Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 42). Customer demand can be derived from personal contacts between customers and their consultants or by statistical research methods. These market results have to be transferred into the company, the respective work areas and into the corresponding processes. Customer orientation has to become part of the objective planning process of the entire company. Otherwise products and features of products are developed, which will not be valued by the customer and consequently not bought. The degree of customer satisfaction should be determined on a regular basis. The results show the extent to which the organisation is able to determine customer expectations and to put them into practice. Internal Customer In a TQM program the focus on internal customers is also very important. Internal customers are the employees, activities or functions that are the customer of other employees, activities, or functions (Omachonu & Ross, 1994: 120). For example manufacturing is the customer of design and various departments may be the customer of human resources. The majority of people in an organisation never meet their external customers directly. As a consequence, they often fail to realise their individual importance in improving quality. Therefore, as Atkinson (1990: 120) says, “everybody within an enterprise should consider the interactions between themselves and their “internal” customers – those who are next in line”. First, if this internal customer/supplier chain is successful, it will be possible to meet the needs of the external customer. 15 Figure 2.4: The Customer/Supplier Network Source: Dale & Cooper, 1992: 44 But in organisations conflicts between the needs of internal customers and the need of external customers might arise, as processes may be designed to only meet the requirements of internal customers and not external ones. It has to be clear who the customer is and who shall be the beneficiary of the process. Therefore the needs of both customer groups must be in balance. Determining the real needs of both groups and accordingly designing the underlying process must be the solution (Omachonu & Ross; 1994: 121). The effectiveness of this internal relationship should be examined on a regular basis. It builds the basis for a successful communication and cooperation with all external customers and suppliers. 2.3.6 Supplier Integration The degree of co-operation with external suppliers has a strong influence on quality and competitiveness of a company. A long-term and trustful relationship with the supplier is a key element of every quality system. Only suppliers, which also set a 16 high priority on quality goals and strive for continuous process improvements are suitable. According to Oakland (1992: 200), organisations should adopt an assessment proceeding with regard to the following points: • Quality capability in the management system • Process and product quality • Communication capabilities • Loyalty, flexibility and Just-in-Time capabilities • Cost discipline and continuous cost control • Development potential Due to the variety of assessment criteria, a company should create a team, which elaborates and analyses the capabilities of potential suppliers. 2.3.7 Continuous Improvement (Kaizen) Throughout many centuries societies were set up in a way to prevent change. Doing something different was often even punished by death. In the Byzantine Greek language the word for change also meant danger (Wadsworth, et al., 2002: 91). For the first time in 1964 Juran documented in his book “Managerial Breakthrough” a structured approach that companies could use to achieve breakthrough improvements. In later years rapid change has become a “way of life” in many organisations (Wadsworth, et al., 2002: 91). Nowadays continuous improvement is also known as Kaizen, which is the Japanese word for change. Within TQM, organisations have their main focus on customer satisfaction. Kaizen can be seen as a “systematic approach to close the gap between customer expectations and the characteristics (Rao, Carr, Kopp, Martin, Rafii & Schesinger, 1996: 165). of process output” 17 This philosophy has been developed by the Japanese and mastering this philosophy has been a very influential factor in their productivity and global competitiveness. Organisations are comprised of various processes and sub processes that are interdependent to each other. Outputs of some processes may be the input for other processes. Consequently we have internal and external suppliers and customers. The customer of each process has requirements, needs and expectations (Rao, et al., 1996: 165). Continuous improvement therefore does not only try to close the gap to external but also to internal customers. Figure 2.5: Relationship between suppliers processes and customers Input Internal or external supplier Output Process Internal or external Customer Source: Rao, et al., 1996: 166 These processes can be in any function or cross functional and Kaizen aims primarily at the improvement of the involved employee – from the worker to the top management. But particular attention is paid to cross functional cooperation (Ebel, 2001: 62). Identifying and eliminating useless and hindering features within an organisation will lead to continuous improvement. Starting point is the involvement of everyone, the analysis of processes and actions and the development of a clear plan. Kaizen has to be seen as a continuous evolutionary process, which takes place permanently and is never completed. Consequently continuous improvement requires a pro-active and systematic fact based continually ongoing approach (Rao, et al., 1996: 166). 18 Within TQM the improvement of products and processes happens in little steps that each has only a very small likelihood to fail. The more unknown the fields of improvements the smaller the steps should be in order to minimise the risk of failure and related costs. Further these small steps give employees the feeling of success and keep them motivated. If the step would be too big, it would demotivate employees and they might resign as the task could be too challenging (Ebel, 2001: 61). This Japanese small scale approach of continuous improvement has often been contrasted to the typically American aim of large-scale breakthroughs (Rao, et al., 1996: 166). Deming Cycle One of the aids Deming advocates for improving quality is the “plan, do, check and act cycle”, which is abbreviated P.D.C.A. - cycle. It is further known as the Deming cycle (Hellriegel, Jackson & Slocum, 1999: 303). This model has become a central model of the Kaizen philosophy. This improvement cycle outlines a way to achieve improved processes. The process of improvement can be split in the different phases of plan, do, check and act. First a plan for improvement has to be developed. Data must be selected in order to clearly identify the issue that is to be revised. Intended changes must be defined, measures and methods selected, measurable indicators defined and obstacles discussed (plan). Secondly the measures and methods have to be implemented (do). In the third stage (check) the effectiveness of the measures and methods are checked using the indicators. Sound results are standardised and deviations are analysed. In the last stage the experiences are utilised and the process implemented (Hellriegel, et al., 1999: 304). before the cycle begins anew (Act) 19 Figure 2.6: P.D.C.A. Cycle Source: http://www.wikipedia.org By providing an overall plan, the improvement cycle helps to avoid the stagnation of the improvement activities in the planning phase. Each of the four stages has to be passed correctly in order to find the respective root causes. This should be done by a small group of staff, a so-called quality circle, which regularly meets on a voluntary basis to discuss quality problems in the specific work area. The task of the circle is to develop, promote and implement the established solutions. The result will be the achievement of a higher quality level. Nowadays many tools / concepts help to find continual improvements. Particularly statistical work helps to find room for improvements but also concepts like Benchmarking, Lean Management, and Quality Controlling that are briefly described herein after. 2.3.8 Benchmarking Benchmarking is a tool that enables organisations to evaluate whether its manner of carrying out particular functions and processes represent “best practices”. Here fore 20 costs and effectiveness are taken into account. Benchmarking is a continuous process of comparing the performance of activities and processes in the value chain, “how materials are purchased, how suppliers are paid, how inventories are managed, how products are assembled, how fast the company gets new products to markets, how the quality function is performed, how customer orders are filled and shipped, how employees are trained, how payrolls are processed, and how maintenance is performed” (Thomson & Strickland, 2003: 134). All companies, which show an excellent performance of a particular process, product or service, can function as a benchmark. The comparison throughout all industries and markets is possible. But not only external but also internal benchmark may be applicable. Generally said most types of benchmarking can be classified in the three following categories (Pycraft, Singh & Phihlela, 2000: 656): Internal benchmarking, which refers to a comparison between operations or parts of operations that all belong to the same total organisation. External Benchmarking, which describes a comparison between different organisations that compete in the same sector. Non-competitive benchmarking, which is a comparison of the own organisation’s activities or processes against an external organisation that does not compete in the same markets. The continuous process of Benchmarking includes (Hellriegel, et al., 1999: 301): 1. Defining the issue to be benchmarked 2. Identifying the best performers 3. Collecting and analysis of data to identify gaps 4. Setting improvement goals 5. Developing and implementing plans to close the gap seven basic steps 21 6. Evaluating results 7. Repeating evaluation Benchmarking is not only useful to find out what determines the success of others; it is much more a method of continuous improvement. The aim is to encourage a systematic learning process, a learning culture, which helps to identify and improve the own performance. The performance differences and its belonging causes have to be analysed. The results function as a basis to determine a new and higher performance standard and to develop new plans, objectives and measurements. These measurements should be put into practice by the organisation in co-operation with all members. But benchmarking has also limitations. The process should be linked to various sources of information, such as changing customer expectations and preferences, too. The approach of benchmarking may not be adequate for determine the future strategy. It does not give information about whether to retain an activity or process or rather source it out, as it only shows the present status of how other organisations perform in a defined issue. If benchmarking is only used to copy best practices it can only lead to short term competitive advantages and it may also hinder the own organisation to be creative and innovative (Hellriegel, et al.,1999: 303). 2.3.9 Lean Production Lean Production is not only a production concept but can be also seen as an organisational concept. The Concept has been discussed frequently in recent years and is referred to as Lean Management, too. It uses the word lean (or fragile) in contrast to robust and buffered and must also be seen as a holistic concept that includes different functions like procurement, R&D, production and sales (Zink, 2004: 20). It supports the management following its objectives on quality, productivity, flexibility and employee motivation. 22 The aim of lean management is to eliminate any action that does not create value. These actions are also referred to as waste. There are different kinds of waste such as overproduction, repeated transport, production of defective parts or waiting times (Zink, 2004: 21). Any kind of stock or buffer, such as substitute workers for expected absentees or temporary material stocks shall be avoided. Buffers and stocks hide problems and build a security network for disturbances. Too often problems and mistakes are seen as unavoidable, and a buffered production management method is applied. Although this method compensates mistakes, it leads to unnecessary and high costs for the used buffer. A “lean” organisation gives up the described security network. Not the effects but the causes are removed and problems are eliminated in the long run (Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 96). This concept builds the basis for every just-in-time production. The product is delivered and proceeded without any buffer in a synchronised way. Additionally the human aspect has to be taken into account. Knowledge and the will of the employees replace the security net of buffers. Therefore capital is substituted by ability and mastery. In order to achieve this, co-operation between leaders and employees are essential (Hummel & Malorny, 2004: 97). 2.3.10 Preventive Measures Even inspecting every singly product does not increase the quality of a product. Carrying out quality intensive product inspections implies that the processes allow variations and specifications cannot be matched. In such a scenario failures are expected (Hummel & Malorny, 2004: 75). Inspections of products take place after any possible deviation or failure has taken place and is historical action. At this stage nothing can be done to correct the variation (Omachonu & Ross; 1994: 97). Variations are only detected after an expense on time and material. In the context of TQM a system should be implemented that improves the process. Moving from inspection to process control does not necessary mean that any inspections is abolished. But inspecting process control leads to a measurement that has a 23 diagnostic role. The aim is not to detect nonconforming products but to point out and remove the causes of the variation (Omachonu & Ross; 1994: 97). In order to secure quality, inspections in terms of TQM must be carried out as preventive measures. These measurements have to set in at the early stages of the process. As in the philosophy of TQM no activity stands alone but is interrelated with other business functions or activities the process approach must also take this into account. Considering and optimising a process can only encompass all activities and the whole product life cycle. Consequently inspections and checks that set in too late are ineffective and expensive. Preventive actions lead to higher quality levels, higher productivity and lower costs. Preventive action means not to solve the symptoms of a problem but the underlying causes. With this principle it can be ensured that problems are permanently solved and do not arise again in the future. Moving from inspections to understanding preventive action in the content of TQM is solving problems for continuous improvement (Omachonu & Ross; 1994: 97). See “2.3.7 Continuous Improvement”. A commonly used tool in Total Quality management is the cause-and-effect-diagram, also called Isikawa- or Fishbone-diagram. This diagram can be used to identify multiple causes for a single result. Ideally it is used in teams, where everybody contributes in brainstorming sessions and suggests possible causes for a known problem or error (Kemp, 2006: 150). Further it is a very powerful tool for the DemingCycle, which is described in 2.3.7. 24 Figure 2.7: Example of Ishikawa / Fishbone Diagram In addition to new and unexpected problems, there are predictable mistakes. It should be standard that managers use forecasting methods to analyse them and to find ways to avoid them. For a company it is not an easy task to switch from a correct when detect mentality to a mentality of preventive actions. All members of an organisation have to be involved in the process and have to learn how they individually can influence the process of avoiding mistakes. 2.4 Management of Process Quality For long-term planning a dynamic and process related view is essential, because only this allows a continual development and improvement (Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 107). In order to manage the quality of processes an adequate quality control must be installed. Performance data and external and internal reporting, as traditionally delivered from accounting, are good indicators for the performance and the financial situation of a company. But they are static, focusing on past performance, and do not necessarily contain information about future consequences. A decision may presently be profitable but hinder the competitiveness form tomorrow. Traditional accounting stands in contrast to long-term planning and a dynamic and process related view. 25 Since it is mainly concentrating on economic efficiency, it prevents long-term beneficial decisions. Quality controlling does not focus primarily at the efficient performance of an organisation but emphasises the long term competitiveness. A quality control under TQM concentrates on processes that are used to achieve higher quality. This process approach includes all processes of an organisation (Omachonu, et al., 1994: 94). Quality control is a company wide system and the term total quality control is applicable, too. Feigenbaum encompasses this managerial and system approach when he defines total quality control as “an effective system for integrating the quality development, quality maintenance and quality improvement efforts of the various groups in an organisation so as to enable production and service at the most economical level which allows for full customer satisfaction” (Wadsworth, et al., 2002: 28). In order to operationalise, many authors stress the importance of statistical control. Statistical principles and techniques allow studying processes and the achievement of continuous improvement (Wadsworth, et al., 2002: 28). With quality controlling the conformity with internal guidelines is less important than the “voice of the customer”. The clear focus lies on quality improving means, which is determined by the customer. Therefore the core focus lies on the customer benefit (Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 108). In order to fulfil the requirements of quality controlling, it should according to Hummel & Malorny focus especially on the following points (Hummel & Malorny, 2002: 109-110): Customer perspective, which can be expressed e.g. as ratios for customer satisfaction, number of complaints, duration of the regulation of complaints, etc. Employee perspective, which can be measured as e.g. rate of fluctuation, days of illness, number of implemented improvements, etc. 26 Process perspective, which can be expressed as duration for the development for new products, expenses for research and development, level of inventories and buffers, throughput times of orders, etc. Financial perspective that traditional includes ratios as turnover, profit, costs, market shares, etc. Quality controlling helps to characterise the capacity of the entire organisation. This can be best done by a self-assessment of the company. A useful tool for the self-assessment process is the Excellence Model, which was developed by the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM, See: 2.6) as a supportive framework for the TQM implementation. It also functions as assessment guideline for the European Quality. 2.5 Quality Cost and TQM Organisations have been trying to cut cost in a “conventional” way by addressing areas such as improving methods to cut labour costs, product redesign to reduce material costs and manufacture, increases efficiency, inventory management, etc. (Juran & Gryna, 1988: 9.4). Therefore the traditional approach to the relationship between quality and costs was that higher quality was in line with higher costs (Pycraft, 2000: 741). “Unconventional” costs that are mainly hidden in overheads were not addressed. These costs can be differentiated between the following costs of quality (Juran & Gryna, 1988: 9.5): Internal Failure Costs These costs are associated with defects that are detected before the product is delivered to the customer. 27 External Failure Costs These costs incurred when defects are detected before the product is delivered to the customer. If no defects exist both internal and external failure costs would disappear. Appraisal costs Appraisal costs are associated with determining the degree of conformity with quality requirements. Examples are tests, inspections, and audits. Prevention costs These costs are associated with actions to keep failure and appraisal costs to a minimum. Examples are quality planning and process control. In the traditional way of thinking there is a clear relationship between these categories. As failure costs would decrease, costs for appraisal and prevention increase. As efforts for quality increase the costs for providing these activities, such as extra quality controlling and inspections increase proportionally. Simultaneous the costs for failure, errors etc. decreased. Consequently there was an optimum with minimised total costs for quality (Pycraft, et al., 2000: 743). 28 Figure 2.8: Total Quality costs TQM rejects this model of optimum costs for a number of reasons (Pycraft, et al., 2000: 744-745): • Failure and poor quality are not acceptable. • Not all costs are known and measurable. • Failure costs are much higher than traditionally estimated. • Prevention costs and cost of getting towards zero defects are not inevitably high. The approach of an optimum cost level does not encourage employees to improve quality. 29 Taking theses reasons for rejecting the traditionally approach it becomes obvious that the total cost of quality decreases with prevention. The idea of TQM is doing things right the first time (Pycraft, et al., 2000: 747). Instead of looking for an optimum the TQM concept tries to reduce all failure costs by preventing errors and failures taking place. TQM stresses that putting more effort in prevention has a significant positive effect on internal failure costs. This also results in decreasing external failure costs and, in the long run through higher confidence in the own processes, in decreasing appraisal costs (Pycraft, et al., 2000: 746). 2.6 The European Quality Award Following the success of the US quality model (the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award), 14 leading European companies established the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) in 1988 in Brussels to encourage European businesses to improve competitiveness through the use of the TQM philosophy (Sun, Sapphire & Ho, 2003: 134). The EFQM has created a holistic model, which they refer to as “business excellence” (Zink, 2004: 56). Since 1992 the EFQM rewards the European Quality Award (EQA) and presently more than 800 companies are member of the EFQM (Pfitzinger, 2002: 29). The European Model generally follows the US model. Apart from same very small exceptions the contents of both models are the same, only the structure varies. The European structure clearly differentiates between so called “Enablers”, criteria that allow a successful leadership and “results”, criteria to measure the success of the company (Pfitzinger, 2002: 30). The American model emphasises on the criterion “Society Results”. The main aim of the EFQM model is to support the implementation of TQM within Europe. The intention is to strengthen and further develop the position of the European industry within the world market. The Excellence Model is the most widely used organisational framework in Europe and has become the foundation for most Quality Awards. It encourages all European enterprises to put the theoretical principles of TQM into praxis and to fit them into the managerial behaviour of the organisation. 30 The European TQM-Model is divided into nine main criteria. The content of these criteria are described in a relatively brief way and within the criteria there is no further structure. This is a further contrast to the American model, which is far more detailed (Malorny, 2002: 246). The nine criteria are differentiated between enablers that show the capacity of an organisation and results. Both categories account for 500 points that equal 50 %. The following table gives an overview of the various criteria and the respective weights within the model: Figure 2.9: The EFQM Model Enablers Results People People 90 points (9%) 90 points (9%) Leadership Leadership 100 points 100 points (10%) (10%) Policy and Strategy Policy and Strategy 80 points (8%) 80 points (8%) Partnerships & Partnerships & Resources Resources 90 points (9%) 90 points (9%) Capacity 500 points (50%) People Results People Results 90 points (9%) 90 points (9%) Processes Processes 140 140points points (14%) (14%) Customer Customer Results Results 200 points (20%) 200 points (20%) Key Key Performance Performance Results Results 150 points 150 points (15%) (15%) Society Results Society Results 60 points (6%) 60 points (6%) Results 500 points (50%) Source: Zink, 2004: 70 Comparing the topics of the criteria to the principles of TQM (see: 2.3), it becomes obvious that EFQM works within the framework of TQM. The yearly award has reached a very high value within the European business area. 31 CHAPTER 3 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS The first quality management systems (QMS) emerged in the 1940, when the NATO developed quality standards in order to enable a degree of harmonisation. Apart from the military standards, a variety of standard systems have been developed in the civil world. Dominant systems are the BS 5750 (British standard) the EN 29000 (European standard) and the ISO 9000 (Beckford, 2002: 221). However, implemented by some 634.000 organisations in 152 countries the ISO 9000 standards represents the currently established global standard and international reference for quality management requirements in business-to-business dealings (www.iso.ch). ISO 9000, as other QMS, represents a formal record of an organisation’s method of managing the quality of its products and services. Using these standards, organisations can demonstrate to itself, its customers and importantly to an independent certification body that it has established an effective system for managing the quality of products and services. Quality management systems ensure that all product / service performance requirements and needs of the customer are fully met (Beckford, 2002: 221). Further they should apply to and interact with all processes within the organisation, ranging from the identification of the customer requirements to their satisfaction including all transaction interfaces in between (Oakland, 2003: 208). In this chapter the author gives an overview of QMS exemplifying them by using the most commonly accepted one: the ISO 9000: 2000 series. 3.1 International Organisation for Standardisation The name ISO has its roots in Greek. Because the abbreviation for the International Organisation for Standardisation would be different in various languages it was decided to use a word derived from the Greek word “isos” which means equal (www.iso.org). 32 ISO is a network of more than 150 national standards institutes, with a Central Secretariat in Geneva, Switzerland, which coordinates the system. It is a non -governmental organisation and its members are not representatives of the respective governments. But it occupies a special position between the public and private sectors. This is because, on one hand, some members have their roots uniquely in the private sector, having been set up by national partnerships of industry associations. On the other hand, some member institutes are part of national governmental structures, or are mandated by their government. This enables ISO to act as a bridging organisation in which a consensus can be reached on solutions that meet both the requirements of business and broader needs of society, such as the needs of stakeholder groups like consumers and users (www.iso.org). 3.2 ISO 9000: Series The ISO 9000 family of international quality management standards and guidelines has earned a global reputation as the basis for establishing quality management systems. The latest revision of the standards was published on the 15th of December 2000. This was a much more substantial revision than the one in 1994. These revised standards are identified by the "2000" in their designation. In 2000 the three standards ISO 9001: 1994, ISO 9002: 1994 and ISO 9003: 1994 have been integrated into the new ISO 9001: 2000. The section ISO 9004 has been adopted. The ISO 9000 standards are comprehensive and encompass activities ranging from the development of the product to after-sales services (Beckford, 2002: 222). Together the series provides a coherent set of management standards to enable better understanding across nations in international trade. The latest revision of the international standard promotes a process approach when developing, implementing and improving the effectiveness of a QMS, to enhance customer satisfaction by meeting their requirements. In order to work effectively, an organisation has to identify and manage numerous linked activities. 33 Processes are recognized as consisting of one or more linked activities that require resources and must be managed to achieve predetermined output. The output of one process may directly form the input to the next process and the final product is often the result of a network or system of processes (EN ISO 9001: 2000: 11). A process approach can be described as the application of a system of processes together with the identification of the single process its interaction with other processes and the corresponding management. The following table gives an overview of the names and purposes of the ISO 9000: 2000 family of standards before they are described in more detail hereinafter: Table 3.1: Overview of ISO 9000: 2000 family ISO Name 9000:2000 QMS - Fundamentals and Vocabulary 9001:2000 QMS - Requirements 9004:2000 QMS - Guidelines for performance improvements Purpose Describes the fundamentals and specifies the terminology for QMS Specifies the requirements for a QMS where an organisation needs to demonstrate its ability to provide products that fulfil customer and applicable regulatory requirements and aims to enhance customer satisfaction. Provides guidelines that consider both the effectiveness and efficiency of the QMS, with the aim of improving the performance of the organisation and satisfaction of customers and other interested parties. Source: Oakland, 2003: 2009 3.2.1 ISO 9000: 2000 This norm can be understood as introduction to quality management. It provides a support in quality issues regarding definitions or basis requirements and the tasks of a quality management system (Pfitzinger, 2002: 13). The norm itself does not postulate any requirements but is the basis for ISO 9001. 34 3.2.2 ISO 9001: 2000 ISO 9001: 2000 is used in organisations that seek to establish a management system, which provides confidence in the conformance of their products to established or specified requirements. This standard specifies these requirements for a quality management system that can be used by any organisation that needs to demonstrate its ability to consistently deliver products, which meet customer and/or applicable regulatory requirements and aims to enhance customer satisfaction (www.iso.ch). ISO 9001: 2000 has been developed in a user-friendly format using terms that are easily recognized by all business sectors. The standard is used for certification and contractual purposes by organisations seeking recognition of their quality management system. It is the only standard within the ISO 9000 family that can be certified by an external agency. Within the standards the word “product” is used, which refers to services, processed material, hardware and software intended for, or required by the customer. ISO 9001 determines the requirements for a QMS that can be used for internal purposes or certification or contract purposes. ISO 9001 aims at the function of the QMS with simultaneous customer satisfaction (Pfitzinger, 2002: 16). 3.2.3 ISO 9004: 2000 ISO 9001: 2000 and ISO 9004: 2000 are designed as a consistent pair of standards, so that businesses that want to exceed the requirements of the ISO 9001 can use the principles of ISO 9004 to move towards to business excellence (Boys, Karapetrovic & Wilcock, 2004: 841). ISO 9004: 2000 has the aim of improving the performance of the organisation and provides a respective guideline for effectiveness and efficiency of the QMS (Oakland, 2003: 209). The benefits obtained from ISO 9001: 2000 are extended to all parties that are interested in or affected by the business operations. Interested parties include employees, owners, suppliers and society in general (www.iso.ch). ISO 9004 can be considered as a guideline for improving especially the efficiency of the total output. In this respect this norm exceeds the aims of the QMS under ISO 9001. ISO 9004 is recommended for organisations that want to exceed the 35 requirements of ISO 9001 and rather aim for continuous improvement (Pfitzinger, 2002: 16). In the revised version from 2000 - contrary to the ISO 9000: 1994 - both ISO 9001: 2000 and ISO 9004: 2000 are harmonized in structure and terminology, which is an assistance when moving from one to the other norm. Both standards apply a process approach rather than a life-cycle model (Wadsworth, et al, 2002: 59). The eight Quality Management principles stated in ISO 9000: 2000 and ISO 9001: 2000 provide the basis for the performance improvement outlined in ISO 9004: 2000. 3.2.4 Scope of ISO 9000: 2000 Series When an organisation needs to demonstrate its ability to provide products that meet customer requirements consistently, the ISO 9000 series specifies requirements for a QMS. Further it addresses customer satisfaction through the requirements for continuous improvement and the prevention of nonconformity (Wadsworth, et al., 2002: 60). 3.3 Reasons to implement ISO 9000 Series Two main categories of reasons can be identified (Jones, Arndt & Kustin,1997: 651): Internal and development related reasons that lead to improvements of procedures. External and non – development related reasons that are market related. Ad a) In general these reasons for companies seeking for ISO 9001 certification are the strive for improved quality and efficiency, the achievement of better communication, competitive advantage, increasing market share, cost reductions. It is expected that new customers and higher turnover are a result of the increased perceived quality 36 (Magd & Curry, 2003: 247). The certification shows management’s commitment to quality which may also result in a rising share price. More specific the implementation of the ISO standard helps companies to be valued for their quality by externals and it provides a model and the respective process for a continuous self – assessment against an externally recognised system. Ad b) The registration may be required by customers or markets or it can be a prerequisite for tendering processes. In many sectors it has become a prerequisite for doing business. Without the certification companies would loose enormous shares of the market, as competitors have received the external certification and customers perceive it as critical. Particularly in Business to Business big organisations tend to only procure from suppliers that have a valid ISO 9001 certification and also only acknowledge certified suppliers. Further companies may use the certification as a marketing or public relation tool, as they belief customers may be impressed by the achievement of the certificate (Jones, et al, 1997: 652). 3.4 Quality Management Principles in ISO 9000 Series The quality management system standards of the revised ISO 9000: 2000 series is based on eight quality management principles. These principles can be used by senior management as a framework to guide their organisations towards improved performance (Oakland, 2003: 211). The principles are derived from the collective experience and knowledge of the international experts, who participate in the ISO Technical Committee, which is responsible for developing and maintaining the ISO 9000 standards (www.iso.ch). The eight quality management principles are defined in ISO 9001: 2000 and the harmonised ISO 9004: 2000. These principles should be used to develop a QMS and were identified to be used by top management as they lead their organisations and 37 improve performance (Oakland, 2003: 209). These principles are listed in the ISO 9001: 2000 (Wadsworth, et al., 2002: 60): • Determine the needs and expectations of customers and other interest parties. • Establish the quality policy and quality objectives of the organisation. • Determine the process and responsibilities necessary to attain the objectives. • Determine and provide the resources necessary to attain the quality objectives. • Establish methods to measure the effectiveness and efficiency of each process. • Apply these measures to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of each process. • Determine means to prevent nonconformities and eliminate their causes. • Establish and apply a process for continual improvement. 3.5 Structure and Requirements of the QMS Standard ISO 9001: 2000 begins with an introduction, which is followed by eight sections. In these sections the requirements are defined (ISO, 2000a: 11). The introduction contains a general section followed by a description of the process approach to quality management including its relationship the “plan, do, check, act” concept (see: Deming Cycle in chapter 2.3.7 Continuous Improvement). After the introduction the ISO 9001: 2000 deals with the relationship to other QMS standards, in particular the ISO 9004: 2000 and the environment related ISO 14001 standard. The first section deals with the scope of the standard, containing the application and comments regarding requirements that may not be applicable in all situations. 38 The two following sections are “normative references” and “terms and definitions”. The fourth section deals about some general requirements of quality management systems. This includes requirements for identifying and managing the system. Further general documentation requirements are discussed. General documentation requirements include document procedures, work instructions, manuals and the respective records and controls of these documents. The last four sections compose the "requirements" of the standard, which are going to be described herein after: 3.5.1 Management Responsibility The fifth section deals with management responsibilities and its commitment to quality. Management responsibility includes a specific responsibility for ensuring continuous improvement and benchmarking (Oakland, 2003: 222). It stresses the importance of a very high and visible commitment from the management to high quality. Management does so by establishing quality policies, setting quality objectives and establishing a system that focuses on problem prevention rather than finding defects after they occurred. These quality related corporate policies must be developed in line with all other corporate policies and clearly communicated to all employees. These policies must contain a definition of good quality and the goals for quality improvement. Quality objectives must be emphasised explicitly including the key elements of quality. It is management responsibility as well to ensure that the quality policy is understood, implemented as ensuring that the systems functions in an effective way. The fifth section also encompasses the appointment of a management representative, who is in charge of the operations and the quality system. This person must be from top management or have at least direct access to top management. The QMS must be reviewed at predetermined times to ensure effectiveness of the system. This includes internal and external audits, customer feedbacks, process performance, preventive actions, etc. 39 3.5.2 Resource Management The 6th section of the ISO 9001: 2000 states the necessity of providing the respective resources needed for maintaining the quality system. Here a clear focus lies on human resources, particularly determining the required competencies of the task and the match of the individual skills (Oakland, 2003: 222). Gaps must be closed by providing training. The effectiveness of the training must be evaluated and documented. The QMS requires that the organisation demonstrates that every employee will be provided with the opportunity to realise the own full potential and contribution to the organisation (Oakland, 2003: 222). A further requirement is a proper infrastructure and work environment. 3.5.3 Product Realisation The last two sections are the most extensive parts of the ISO 9001: 2000 and they contain numerous subsections. Section seven deals with the product and has six subsections. The first subsection deals with quality planning. The customer gives the input for this planning through his requirement. The output of this process is the designed product. This requires quality objectives for the product (or service) and the needed processes. It has to be recorded in quality plans and tests in order to verify the product quality have to be carried out. The requirement of 7.2 is the determination of all customer requirements. This includes availability, delivery, support, etc. but also aspects not specified by customers but necessary for the use of the product. Organisations are also required to review these aspects and to ensure that they are able to meet them. Section 7.3. covers the design and development of a product or service. At this stage appropriate planning activities are required in order to control the entire design process. The design must be defined and documented in such a way that all functional, regulatory and legal requirements are met. This should include necessary requirements for production operations and explain how the product is used safely and correct. All changes in the design must be controlled, documented and again checked if they meet the requirements. 40 Section 7.4 deals with purchasing and its control. Purchased products and services must meet the internally specified requirements. The respective criteria for selection and periodic supplier evaluation must be defined and results documented. The next section is entitled “Production and Service Operations”. This covers the control of the operations that are relevant to production and services. Therefore information must be made available regarding specifications, work instructions, devises needed for monitoring and measuring, and instructions for deliveries and post delivery activities. Further it is referred to special processes that only become apparent once the product is in use and products must be traceable through the whole production. The last subsection covers controlling measuring and monitoring devices. All devises must be protected from damage and be controlled, serviced and calibrated in appropriate intervals. These activities must be documented and if deviations are found, corrective actions must be carried out. Calibration should be made against recognised national or international standards. For guidance purposes ISO 10012 is referenced in this section. 3.5.4 Measurement, Analysis and Improvement Measurement and analysis requires that an appropriate performance measurement system is in place. This section contains five subsections. The first is a general section stating that the organisation must define, plan, and implement measuring and monitoring activities that are needed to ensure product improvement and conformity, which in turn enables audits of the delivered product or service. The section “monitoring and measurement” covers the requirement that an organisation must measure customer satisfaction and conduct internal audits at regular intervals to ensure that the QMS conforms to the requirements of the ISO 9001: 2000 and the previously self defined own requirements. The QMS must be implemented effectively and maintained. All processes and products must be monitored and measured and respective internal audits carried out. ISO 19011 gives guidelines for internal audits. These quality audits must contain: 41 • Verification of the compliance with the organisation’s quality policy • Determination of the effectiveness of the QMS • A schedule with a sound frequency • Documentation procedures • Follow-up action • Documentation of results This then should be shown to management and any deficiencies found must be corrected immediately. The third subsection covers nonconformity of products. The requirement is that nonconforming products are identified and that corrective actions are taken. These products must not be delivered to the customer. Further nonconformity must be analysed and its reasons be identified and corrective actions taken. The last two sections refer to corrective action and preventive action. Section 8.4 requires that quality related data are collected and analysed. These data include customer satisfaction, conformity to requirements, process characteristics and suppliers. The last subsection requires the organisation to plan continuous improvement through the use of the quality policy, quality objectives, audit results, analysis of the data, corrective and preventive actions and management review. 3.6 Limitations of the ISO 9000 family In many respects the revised QMS is a major improvement to the former version from 1994. It particularly recognises the process orientation and emphasizes on the importance of people within organisations (Oakland, 2003: 223). It is a relatively closed QMS that focuses on fulfilling norms. It is a traditional and expert orientated 42 system, which is mainly steered externally based on existing norms (Stockmann, 2002: 9). Oakland (2003: 223) classifies the limitations into the following categories: Despite the process orientation, it continues reflecting a static interpretation of the organisation, it deals with the ´what` and ´how` and according to Stockmann (2002: 9) this focus on the present situation does not reflect success criteria sufficiently. The standard does not explicitly address the issue of business or organisational benefit. The process orientation should go further and also emphasise on “special processes”. The issue of people as the heart of quality could be stronger addressed. It contains the potential limitation of bureaucracy, the disuse and association with the former standard ISO 9000: 1994. This further limits creativity and innovation (Stockmann, 2002: 9). The potential advantages of the ISO 9000: 2000 family can be destroyed if the designers of QMS continue to apply the “same procedure-focused mechanistic and bureaucratic mindset” (Oakland, 2003: 223), which prevailed in the past. The standard bears the risk that it is primarily compliant orientated which leads to a bureaucratic nightmare. More and more people are required just to maintain the system, to collect and analyses data without the intended impact on improvement. 43 CHAPTER 4 TQM BASED ON ISO 9000: 2000 Comparing both the ISO 9000 standard and TQM it is obvious that both concepts follow the same goal, to improve quality of the respective organisation and its products/services and achieving better business performance. Particularly with the revised version ISO 9000: 2000 it becomes apparent that the two frameworks are moving closer together (Hongyi, et al., 2004: 138). Nevertheless both systems follow different approaches. ISO 9000 implementation is more associated with line workers, while TQM is more related to top management. Moreover, the focus of ISO 9000 is on proving compliance and achieving certification, while TQM focuses stronger on continuous improvement and achieving and maintaining customer satisfaction (Magd & Curry, 2003: 248). Furthermore, the concept of TQM is broader and deeper than the ISO 9000 family. TQM is identified to be for internal organisational use and tends to go beyond customer satisfaction, while ISO 9000 is primarily for external applications in order to achieve customer satisfaction. ISO 9000 is a management control procedure that reflects the company’s practices with process documentation in respect of designing, production and distribution to ensure that the quality meets customer requirements (Stevenson & Barnes, 2002: 696). In this respect the ISO 9000 series deals more with compliance of predetermined standards. ISO 9000 can be considers as a system that ensures the quality of products and services and the processes to create the output. The emphasis lies on the unambiguousness and traceability of processes. In contrast to this QMS, TQM primarily questions whether the right things are done. All actions take clearly the customer and continuous improvement into account and rather focus on business excellence (Zink, 2004: 55). TQM focuses on all stakeholders and it is a holistic approach with the goal of business excellence. It exceeds the approach of the ISO 9000 series as it does not focus on quality assurance but includes leadership and all employees on all levels within the 44 hierarchy. Quality is the central aspect of all activities and TQM builds on long-term success of the organisation. This shall be beneficial not only for the management and employees but also the society (Pfitzinger, 2002: 5). The basis for all quality related activities in an organisation is the determination of the actual process structure. Once processes are transparent and the organisation is governed along the processes, further investigations can be carried out. ISO 9000 is a system with which the organisation commits itself to a clear structure. This structure must not only show and correct mistakes but also prevent mistakes. On this level ISO 9000 is a sound and systematic basis for TQM (Pfitzinger, 2002: 7). 45 CHAPTER 5 THE COMPANY 5.1 Company Description The name of the company is HERMANN FLIESS & Co. GmbH, hereinafter referred to as Fliess. Fliess is a medium sized production company with 60 employees (30th of June 2007) that was founded in 1915. Since then the company is family run and at the 1st of January 2005 the 4th generation (Alexander H. Fliess) has joined the company. In September 2006 Alexander became the General Manager (GM) of Fliess and Henning Fliess, the senior starts to retire. He gradually withdraws from the operational business. In 2008 he will resign as GM and will only be present on demand. Fliess is a manufacturer of welding wires (welding filler materials) for mainly automated welding processes. The raw material is wire rod that is generally drawn down from a diameter 5.5 mm to anything between 0.8 mm and 5.0 mm. For a schematically illustration of the production process see Appendix A. Fliess develops and produces welding filler materials for the following welding processes: • • Submerged-arc welding • • Gas-shielded-metal-arc welding • • Tungsten-inert gas welding • • Gas welding • • Electro slag welding • • Laser welding The main products of the company are Gas-shielded-metal-arc wire and Submergedarc welding wire. In 2006 Fliess sold 8.200 tons of welding wire. The company exports 60 % of its products mainly to European markets but lately China and India 46 have become significant markets, too. With its products Fliess has a market share of 4%-5% of the total consumables market in Germany and about 40% of the speciality market, which the company is focused on. Fliess is specialised in medium-alloyed welding filler materials for high-strength, heatresistant, low temperature and weatherproof steels. In these fields mass products can hardly be used. Customers have very high technical demands and require special grades often individualised for customers with a very high level of quality and quality assurance. Due to its own development and close relationships with the steel mills, the company is at the state of the art in its field and able to supply wire for the various applications with highest demands. The production is semi automated which allows a very high degree of customisation and enhances flexibility and smaller batch sizes. The company is known for its relatively short responds and delivery lead times. This customisation is appreciated by most customers as they do not have to buy standardised products as offered by the big welding wire producers. 5.2 Reasons to implement ISO 9000 Standard Fliess has always emphasised the high quality level of its products. At the time when the first ISO 9000 certifications took place, Fliess did not even consider this step. Customers only required superior product quality, which Fliess could supply. At Fliess it was argued that the certification process would foster bureaucratic paperwork and documentations without having any influence in product quality. Fliess always had very tight quality assurance guidelines and as long as the internal processes follow them, no further QMS would be needed. Any compliance with a recognised QMS would be additional work with a negative impact on performance and too much compliance related work would sacrifice flexibility. From this prevailing attitude it is obvious that the reasons for the implementation of the ISO standard were not internal. At the end of the last century the pressure from customers increased dramatically to implement the ISO 9000 series. In the welding consumables sector the first customers started to force its suppliers to have an ISO 9000 accreditation. Some big 47 organisations in the sector of welding wires were already certified. At this stage the ISO 9001: 1994 became a competitive advantage. For a relatively long time Fliess managed to convince the customers that this certification was irrelevant “because the products meet all requirements and there are no complaints from customers”. Due to good and long lasting relations and the performance in the past, customers kept buying although their internal guidelines did not allow this. But in 2000 / 2001 a key customer was bought by a multinational organisation that required ISO certification from all its suppliers and strictly applied this guideline. This was the first time Fliess considered ISO 9000 series as the company was faced with loosing a key customer and a shrinking market share. Not many producers had a certification at this stage and it still meant a competitive advantage. At this time the ISO 9000: 2000 revision had already taken place and the former prejudices against the old ISO diminished. The new series was not merely product orientated but also took processes and reporting systems into account. This process approach was new to the company. 5.3 Implementation of ISO 9001: 2000 At the time of the implementation nobody at the Fliess Company had any experience with QMS and in particular the ISO 9000 family. Therefore help of an external consultant was needed. Together the present status of the organisation and its quality system was analysed. It became obvious that Fliess already had a sophisticated quality department, which carried out quality tests. But most activities were not documented before the implementation. Apart from the product related parts, the ISO 9000 implementation meant a clear change in the way of carrying out operations. The attitude became more process orientated and a structured information system was introduced. These implementations allowed analytical work for the first time. Since the ISO 9000 implementation customer surveys are carried out and complaints are analysed on a regular base. At the first implementation Fliess still did not live the certification. It was something new that was needed. Many requirements were only met on paper in order to satisfy the external inspector from TÜV-Rheinland. From recertification to recertification the 48 company learned more and more and the series became alive. This change took place on all levels throughout the organisation. 5.4 Possible fields of development within the area of TQM The implementation of the ISO 9000 series has helped to streamline the organisation, processes became more transparent and Fliess moved in the direction to steer the company on the basis of processes. The organisation and its processes allows much more not only to identify and abolish single defects or mistakes but also to adopt procedures so that they are avoided in advance. The ISO implementation has changed the company far reaching and after some years of experience the company lives the system approach. But although the company improved sustainable within the last 5 years and now functions in a systematic way, the present status raises the question of how to continue. TQM is an approach that goes beyond the systematic structure but takes many other aspects into account. It has never been considered how product quality is generated. Processes are not seen in direct relationship with the quality of the product. But presently at Fliess a change in generations is taking place. In 2001 the technicalmanager retired and the owner and present GM withdraws gradually from operational business. The new technical manager (Dr. Albrecht Borner) and the new (and 2nd) GM do not follow the traditional view of gaining superior quality. In order to successfully defend the current market position, quality must be increased. Simultaneously costs must be cut as competition particularly from Eastern Europe increases. Therefore the focus has shifted from the product itself to the underlying processes. High quality products shall be the result of excellent process quality. Further this new approach shall be backed up by utilising information technology to a higher degree. 49 5.4.1 Quality awareness In the field of quality awareness the Fliess Company clearly follows an old attitude (see: 2.3.1 Quality Orientation as main company objective). The attitude is rather in line with the ISO 9000 certification. The focus is on compliance and achieving certifications. Relevant certifications are Deutsche Bahn (DB), TÜV, Lloyds Register, etc. All these certifications are important for the business but only focus on the final product. It must be in conformance with present requirements. The underlying processes are less important. So far the traditional approach to the relationship between quality and costs prevails. It is believed that higher quality was in line with higher costs. High quality has always been considered as expensive, but due to the attitude of supplying highest quality, cutting costs in the field of quality has never been considered. Only conventional costs were considered to be a subject of cost savings. The existing attitude towards quality only considers the quality of the individual finished product. Every final product must be checked before it leaves the company (see: 2.5 Quality Cost and TQM) At Fliess it is important that the top management changes the prevailing attitude towards a TQM mentality. The term quality does not only include the quality of the finished product but also of the respective processes. Excellent process quality will decrease interferences. Changing this mentality takes place gradually. The management allows and facilitated discussions. These discussions try to find out causes of various points and include questions like: Where does the most rework take place and where is the most waste? What can be done to prevent rework and waste? Do measures improve process quality? • When and why do machines stand still? • Can this be prevented by an improvement of material flow? • Are the right tools used? 50 • How much time is spend on corrective actions? • How much time is wasted? • Has the product quality been negatively influenced at any stage in order to save time or costs? These topics shall help to address fields for improvement and to identify the benefit of the new attitude. If a success has taken place this is shared with the employees in order to create trust into the new attitude. These examples shall also help to deliver that quality orientation is not only a theoretical approach. 5.4.2 Commitment of Management Implementing TQM is a strategic decision, resulting in changes on all levels within the organisation. As these changes evoke resistance with employees it is vital that management is fully committed to quality. At the Fliess Company basically the GM and the technical manager are perceived as management. Now both have this attitude and agree on the importance of TQM. It is important that the management is an example and decides unambiguously towards quality. This engagement enables necessary changes, which could otherwise be hindered or slowed down. This attitude gives the necessary priority to quality throughout the whole company. Further it is the role of management to communicate the principles of TQM. It must be paid attention that old structures do not continue only because it is of benefit for the individual or just because “it has always been like that”. In the initial phase of implementing TQM the priority is clear and easy to follow, but also future management must pay attention to sustainability. 51 5.4.3 Leadership Development TQM is a method of leading employees, which is based on involvement and participation of the individual. Quality is determined through the commitment of the employees. At Fliess this means creating a suitable environment and a quality acknowledging atmosphere. This shall encourage the creativity and motivation of the people and collaboration must be strengthened. This change requires openness and trust. For a company it is easier to accomplish such a change with a new management. Throughout years decisions have mainly been made by the owner of the company, who certainly had the most experience. He acted rather with a typical owner mentality and controlled the company. It was not the aim to reach consensus and employees are used to this. A rather “ask what to do than to take responsibility and act alone” attitude prevails at Fliess. This culture of rather mistrust must be converted into a culture of trust. People must take more responsibility and start to act on their own initiative. The new generation at Fliess also means a change in leadership. This is a good opportunity also to move to TQM in terms of leadership. With the new generation this change is much more likely to take place. The style of leadership is not dominated by experience in the field of welding wire and it will be easier to involve people in the business instead of telling them what to do. The new quality orientated leadership can be classified in two fields: • Creating a quality enhancing company strategy and structure • Creating social relationships and an environment that encourages learning 52 5.4.4 Employee Participation In the concept of TQM the participation of all employees is an important part. At the Fliess Company the participation of employees, particularly workers, is minor. If the participation would be strengthened, employees would work more independent and take on more responsibility. It is the management task to create an environment that empowers the individual worker to cooperate more in groups and to give input. Instead of external control theses groups should be more self controlled. This way group orientated improvement activities can emerge. Both kinds of groups, cross-functional and within functions, would help to better understand the work of the others and to find ways of improvement. Usually employees have been working at one position for a long time and are very familiar with their work. For them it is easy to identify working problems, to explain the causes and to develop a solution. Presently no employee suggestion scheme is implemented but the management is in close contact with the employees and tries to find out areas of improvement in personal talks. But probably there are far more issues known to the individual worker that will not be disclosed in personal talks. Therefore implementing a systematic way that encourages each worker to disclose ideas will move the company to higher process quality. This implementation will take place in the context of TQM. With the introduction of ISO 9000 job rotation in a structured way has taken place for the first time. At the beginning of 2006 the system of job rotation has been an issue to the management. So far only similar works have been subject to rotation, but this has been changed. It is the aim every worker can work in three different positions. This is backed up by internal training. Further team building will help to break down the division of work. Particularly in the drawing shop this division is very obvious. Every worker has mainly “his” machine. Here a possibility would be not to allocate the work to the individual worker but to the department and the workers must organise the jobs themselves. The aim should be that every worker will be able to carry out every task and is able to work at any machine. 53 Fliess has started to join employees from different departments that do related work. This first “quality circle” is composed of 4 employees, 2 from the drawing shop and 2 from the spooling department. Both works cannot be seen independently as the drawing shop is the internal supplier of the spooling department. The first objective is to identify cross-functional production problems and to improve general operations. This small cycle meets for about one hour every first Tuesday each month. The first finding was that even very small variations in diameters have direct impact on precision-layer spooling. So far Fliess controlled the diameter of the wire down to 1/100 mm. Any variation smaller than that was neglected. It was only made sure that the diameter was within the norm. But variations of some 1000 mm have a strong impact on precision layer winding. For the drawing shop it was easy to set the tolerances to 3/1000 mm, which ensures that the spooling department can work far more efficient as they do not have to interfere manually. 5.4.5 Customer Orientation The Fliess Company has a very strong customer orientation. The sales department, as the interface between customer, production and forwarding department, determines the production plan in the factory. Therefore this department does not only have external but also internal customers. These two dimensions are described in more detail hereinafter: External Customer Within the welding industry Fliess` portfolio does only cover a small but specialized spectrum. Fliess produces mainly very specialised welding consumables for a few industry sectors. The company is mainly serving high demanding industries such as the energy sector with power plants, oil and gas pipelines, off-shore platforms and also pressure vessels and mobile cranes. Fliess has only about 200 customers. The main customers are big welding houses that are not able or do not want to manufacture these specialities. For most products the global demand is very small and steel mills melt the products only in casts of 100 to 150 tons. Therefore Fliess 54 buys the casts and delivers the finished product already packed in the individual boxes of the various welding houses. This way the big companies do not have to buy the casts themselves, which would lead to very high inventories as single casts would last for years. The second big group of customers are independent regional operating specialised dealers. Both groups usually sell the whole range of welding equipment and welding consumables and allow a sophisticated technical service, which is essential in the welding industry. Only about 20 % of the customers are final customers that actually weld. These are for example leading pipe mills or mobile crane manufacturer. These companies are usually technical leaders within their sector. Fliess is involved in the welding development of these companies. Due to this very sophisticated technical support Fliess has a very strong technical knowledge in its field. Most of the customers are visited once a year by the management of the company. The rest of the time the sales department is the only contact to the customers and takes the orders. This department is comprised of four women, one of them is the head of the department and three employees are working at the back office. The head of the department usually does not meet customers personally and only if technical issues are raised the technical manager gets involved. This business practice rather follows the approach of ISO 9000 series than of TQM. For the customer availability of the company is very important. The sales department organises the delivery of products in compliance with the order. But it is very difficult to determine the requirements of the customer. This aspect only gets addresses when management personally visits the customer. But due to the increasing global export this cannot be done in a sufficient manner. Due to the fact that the customers normally distribute the wires themselves the contact to the final customer is very limited. Only some strategic customers allow the insight in the welding process itself. In order to further develop a TQM approach within this field it is important to get to know the customer better. Presently all operations are controlled by the sales department. This ensures that the company produces exactly to the customers order. But customer orientation should be taken a step further, since the customer of an 55 organisation determines the success of an organisation at the end of the day (Zink, 2004: 71). This can be present and / or future customers who should become loyal customers. Due to long co-operations with existing customers long lasting partnerships have been build. But as contact persons of the customers fluctuate and new customers are usually totally unknown cooperation must be emphasised. At Fliess this means that the top management must spend more time with customers. This includes particularly the technical manager. In the past he was only involved in customer contacts, when critical questions came up. Usually visiting customers was not part of his job. Due to present reorganisations at the company the production manager will not be involved in the machine scheduling any more but will be in charge of more technical issues. Previously this was in the responsibility of the technical manager, who now will have more time to build relationships with particularly technical demanding customers. Fliess is about to create a plan for customer visits. The plan has two sections one domestic and one international. All visits will be carried out by either the technical manager the general manager or both together. For some customers the head of sales will join, too. Further Fliess is still quite unknown among the final customers as the products are mainly sold with different brands that are not related to Fliess. Products sold to dealers and final customers were sold in neutral packing (until April 2007). Particularly for dealers it becomes increasingly important to sell products with a superior physical appearance and a strong brand behind the product. This way the final customer becomes more loyal to the specialised traders and consequently they become more loyal to the producer. Therefore a new packing was introduced in April 2007, which replaced the old brown boxes (Appendix B). Internal Customer In order to underline the strive for excellence, it must not only be focused on external customers. It is as crucial to focus on the internal customer / supplier relationships. Due to the structure of the Fliess Company, only few employees have direct contact to customers. For most employees it is therefore difficult to imagine which value the individual input adds to the product. They do not see the external customer at the 56 end of the chain, they just have contact to the next person within the process. Presently there is no awareness of the concept of internal customer / supplier relationship. For a TQM approach this awareness must be created. The Fliess Company has several of these internal customer / supplier relationships. They can be differentiated between production and administration, although there are many interrelations between production and administration. The sales department is in close contact with the customer and hence initiates any production. Due to the production process there are many “internal customer / supplier relationships”. The rough drawing is the supplier of the fine drawing, unless the wire is sold directly in bulk units. The fine drawing is the supplier of all spooling and cutting departments. Ready spooled or cut wire is the input for the packing department. Nearly all departments are also customers of the department for quality assurance. It is the objective of the top management to further emphasise on the importance of these customer relationships. In individual talks the needs of the individual person or function has to be pointed out. In combination with the knowledge of the market, the real external and internal customer needs must be determined. Consequently the processes can be re-evaluated and if necessary be redesigned. With these talks, several findings have already been made. Particularly the department of quality assurance was not fully aware of the individual needs of the other function. Therefore they sometimes supplied much more than was necessary. Particularly in terms of conformity and its documentation a lot of redundant work was found. By addressing the topics with all people that are involved redundancies were pointed out and corrected. 57 5.4.6 Supplier Integration Both the ISO 9000 series and TQM have a focus on suppliers. In the content of ISO 9000 series the focus lies more on supplier evaluation in terms of conformity, whereas TQM considers a long-term and trustful relation to suppliers as even more critical. At Fliess supplier relationships have always be seen as vital as customer relationships. Although in terms of ISO 9000 series the evaluation of existing suppliers, particularly steels mills is quite rudimental, it has always been appreciated that the quality of the own product is significantly influenced by suppliers. Further building new relationships is very difficult. In the field of supplier integration Fliess has always had an approach that was very close to the ideas of TQM. Following the main relationships will be briefly described: For Fliess several suppliers are essential and influence the quality of the final welding wire significantly. This are primarily the steel mills with its rolling mills, and annealing and pickling companies as they cover parts of the value chain that Fliess cannot cover. In these parts it is essential to have reliable partners as the condition of the final product is strongly predetermined. The steel mills melt the casts according to Fliess specifications. Therefore Fliess always have to buy whole casts. Depending on the partner mill, casts have a size of up to 150 tons. The chemical analysis of the wire cannot be changed at any later stage. Together with the steel mills and customers Fliess have determined over 60 different specifications that are sold presently. Particularly in the field of speciality welding wire not many steel mills are able to deliver within the narrow set of specifications. A long term and solid partnership with a few steel mills has always seen as fundamental. Just because some analyses could have been bought cheaper somewhere else, Fliess did not change its supplier. Fliess is not able to draw all analysis directly to all diameters. Therefore for some grades further annealing or pickling becomes necessary. This is done by other wire drawing companies that do not operate in the same sector. For a long time Fliess worked together with only two companies. Although the relationships were very 58 sound in 2006 Fliess started to work with a third company as capacities might become scarce. Fliess works together with only a few companies as key supplier. To them Fliess has historically a very good relationship, sometimes over several generations. This concentration on few suppliers enables a very good collaboration and has additional advantages in contrast to “supplier hopping”. They are mainly time and cost related: • The search for new suppliers is very time consuming. • The framework of cooperation does not have to be newly defined, which is also time intensive and may involve costs as layers might set new framework agreements. • Costs for quality assurance are much lower as standards are already agreed on. • Long-term co-operations give a good understanding of the other company, its strengths and weaknesses. • Long-term co-operations enhance communication between the employees and many things can be done in a quite informal way. • Good partnerships are a good basis for cutting buffer inventories. • Splitting the demand only among a few suppliers allows each supplier to produce more economical. • Higher volumes at one supplier allow better prices. 5.4.7 Continuous Improvement (Kaizen) Although changes have taken place at the Fliess Company, it is essential to understand that it must be a continuous process without an end. With the established ISO 9000: 2001 the focus is more on the QM-system than on continuous improvement. In order to move further in the direction of TQM Fliess must establish the understanding that once an improvement has taken place, it still needs to be 59 monitored and may still be an issue to be addressed. Employees must get a more positive attitude towards changes. Particularly the logic of the PDCA-Cycle must be promoted among the employees. At Fliess the fields for this improvement process can be classified into employee related and group related Kaizen. On the level of the individual workplace minor changes can have a positive impact. Here an emphasis on cleanliness is part of the continuous improvement. Improvements on group level are more difficult as more than one area is involved. An example for Kaizen on this level is the introduction of quality circles. The stronger focus on processes also takes internal customer-supplier relationship into account. This process orientation considers the value chain throughout the organisation and emphasises the customer orientation. This is also an essential contribution to continuous improvement and hence TQM. 5.4.8 Benchmarking Benchmarking is a process that supports continuous improvement. ISO 9000 series does not emphasise on continuous improvement and hence does not deal with benchmarking. In the content of TQM this improvement process is an essential part and hence benchmarking as a tool for improvement is an important issue. At the Fliess Company presently no benchmarking takes place. But benchmarking is a very powerful tool that should be quite easy to be used. As the company is quite small it does not have many different operations that can be considered as reference for benchmarking. But it should be focused on an external benchmarking. It will be very difficult to get information from companies that draw welding wire. But there are many companies around, that draw wire for different purposes. Therefore the production process is similar but there is no competition on the market. Fliess already works together with three wire drawing companies as Fliess is not able to anneal and pickle wire themselves. With these companies a trustful relation already exists. Therefore the first step of identifying appropriate companies for benchmarking is very simple. The only disadvantage is that Fliess cannot judge whether these companies have a leading position within their markets. 60 Further the subjects for benchmarking must be defined. As the production processes (drawing wire) are similar, this process should be addressed. The participating companies must define ratios that shall be measured in the same way. When the benchmarking process has started and data can be compared, the deficits must be disclosed and causes identified. The following aspects then need to be addressed: • The size of the deficit. • The reason why the other company is better. • What are the methods and / or tool this company is using to achieve this result. • The applicability of these methods / tools at the Fliess Company. This benchmarking process will not only be beneficiary for the Fliess Company but can have also great value to the other partner. 5.4.9 Lean Production Under ISO 9001: 2000 Lean Production is not required. But for TQM it is a vital aspect to have a “lean” production. The objective of Lean production is to minimise stocks and buffers as they cover problems and give a security net, which is capital intensive and often not necessary. The inventory at Fliess is composed of more than 60 different analyses that are usually bought in batches of 100 to 150 to. Normally material is stored as wire rod (50 %), pre-drawn wire that just has to be spooled and packed according to the orders (40 %) and as finished products (10 %) that cannot be customized any more. This determines predominantly the fast delivery. Even if the wire has not been pre-drawn a delivery lead time of up to two weeks can be guaranteed. Most of the time this is less than half the delivery time of respective competitors. Often they even need to order the material at the steel mill. In this case the delivery time may be up to 5 month. As most of the competitors do not have such an extensive inventory (ca. ½ of the yearly turnover), Fliess is very often the only company able to deliver. Therefore particularly Fliess is well known in its sector for 61 the extreme high level of inventory as it allows a very good delivery performance. This delivery time is a clear competitive advantage of Fliess. As most of the customers work project orientated it is very difficult to forecast the demand. But this is definitely an area that contains many security buffers that needs to be addressed. Lowering the inventory level and simultaneously maintaining the performance will be an issue to be addressed in a quality cycle on group level. 5.4.10 Preventive Measures Due to the stronger focus on conformity than on continuous improvement, preventive actions are merely part of the TQM philosophy. Preventive actions shall ensure the quality of the product, without the elimination of final inspections. They can be considered as continuous examinations. In this chapter the main inspections at the Fliess Company are examined and it is questioned in what aspects a move from inspection towards process control in combination with preventive actions is possible. At Fliess inspections are most significant as they ensure that the delivered product is free of defect. Therefore they encompass several fields. The most important fields are material mix up and correct packing and labelling. Consequently in these two fields the most comprehensive inspections take place. Material mix up is a very serious issue, as the welding wire almost always looks alike and cannot be differentiated visually. Even if the final product is welded it is very likely that the welder (or roboter) does not realise a mix up. The mix up may only become visible after years as the welded seam does not have the life expectancy as predicted. As Fliess is mainly supplying high demanding industries, this can have catastrophic consequences, e.g. if an oil pipeline 3.000 m below see level cracks. Therefore inspections start with every incoming wire rod that becomes chemically analysed. These are approximately 5.500 rods a year. Inspections continue through the production by checking every bulk spool (approx. 14.000) with resistance measuring. For both checks a piece of wire must be cut off and be analysed in the quality department. A chemical analysis is more complex and determines the chemistry of the wire rod very precisely whereas further inspections are only 62 resistance measurements. Resistance measurements only allow telling whether it is the right wire or not. Presently steel mills are not able to eliminate material mix up totally. Every year Fliess identifies approx. 10 incoming wire rods that have been mixed up. Further the chemical analysis is used to determine whether the casts are within the purchase specification. As a mix-up at this stage cannot be excluded, further inspections must be carried out. The wire rods as they come into production are not individually identified; they are considered as part of a cast. Only the first produced bulk unit gets weight and gets a unique number. This is the stage where every bulk unit is further inspected. This ensures that the worker has taken the correct wire rod and whether the copper surface is up to quality standard. The two testings are in some way redundant. Presently the company develops organisational changes. If the weight of each incoming wire rod were known the traceability would include the wire rode. Then it will be possible to eliminate in-house mix ups and further resistance check would not be needed. This will be a big step away from inspections towards process control. The time limit set for this is the end of 2007. The biggest problem is the variety of the different data sources (steel mills) and the respective data transfer. The second important field for inspection are correct packing and labelling. Due to the enormous product variety nearly every order gets packed and labelled differently. For packing no further inspection takes place. The labels contain many different information. Most of the time the labels include the following information: the brand, grade, cast number, diameter, weight, CE-Mark and approvals, barcodes, etc. But this information varies from customer to customer. Most of them have their own brand, each grade has an own trade name, cast numbers get different codes, CEMark and approvals always depend on the brand and whether the company is allowed to carry them. In the past every customer had pre-designed labels and the information were manually written into the label. A sample of every label was given to the quality department that had to approve the label. 63 In 2006 for the most important customers all relevant information were written in a data base and the sizes of the labels standardised. Since the end of 2006 the master label and the content cannot be changed by the operator any more. The data content for these customers comes out of a database. The quality department is responsible for the layout of the “master label” and the content of the database. No further inspections take place for these customers. Progressively more and more customers will be included in this database. In the field of labelling a big improvement takes presently place. The workflow moves from all manually including inspections to a controlled process. A big improvement in quality has already become visible. In the past labelling was a fulltime job. The aim is to cover this position with a part-time job. The new perspective focuses on cutting failure costs due to fewer mistakes and less work. Particularly appraisal costs are addressed. 5.5 Management of Process Quality For Fliess process quality is another field to move form the implemented ISO 9001: 2000 to TQM. Therefore particular quality control must be considered as basis for a respective management. Presently reliable data are delivered from accounting. These data mainly concentrate on the financial situation and the economic efficiency of the company. They mirror the past and present, but they do not allow a process view as required by TQM. The topical reporting system is unsuitable for predictions of the future competitiveness of the company. It is very difficult to base strategic decisions on this system. The philosophy of TQM requires that quality is the superior objective of the organisation. In order to achieve this Fliess must adjust the reporting system in a manner that quality orientated decisions are supported. The system must include dynamic and process related information. In order to determine the relevant data, Fliess will carry out a self assessment. The criteria catalogue from the EFQM will support the determination. It is essential to identify non value adding activities and to point out improvement potential. 64 CHAPTER 6 IMPLEMENTATION OF TQM AT THE FLIESS COMPANY The basis for the implementation of the TQM is the existing quality system ISO 9001: 2000. The organisational structure is in line with this system and adequate to the size of the company. The initial ideas of introducing TQM came up during the MBA program of the author and this thesis is the starting point of the TQM. Due to the retirement of leaders in the Fliess Company (Technical Manager and Operations Manager) younger people took over these positions. Particularly these two persons are very open for changes and it was not difficult to convince them of TQM. The TQM implementation at Fliess starts with the existing QMS as it functions as basis for further steps. Within this framework no second structure for TQM is introduced. The technical manager and the junior GM take the responsibility for the project. This way the implementation will not lead to an additional structure and TQM becomes part of the organisation. Enhancements that result from TQM activities are included in the existing quality management documentation. This way the creation of a second “TQM-Documentation” in addition to the existing ISO documentation can be avoided. Using only one central documentation increases the acceptance of TQM among employees. Using the existing structure ensures that the organisation stays lean and no further overheads are added. This would also be very difficult to communicate as at the same time other non-productive parts are cut. 6.1 Potential drawbacks of TQM Aligning a company to the philosophy of TQM can have a great potential to improve its performance. But this implementation also bears risks that have to be considered carefully. TQM covers a long-term project therefore it is essential that the company stays on course. Particularly the management must not give up and set priorities to ensure the long-term benefit. 65 The orientation towards TQM has the objective to ensure the company's continuance as a going concern. TQM does not promise breakthrough short-term improvements, as the main changes are changes of the attitude of the employees. Therefore it might become possible that employees start questioning TQM as no big improvements take place at once. And if a project like this fails, the motivation of the individual may be worse than before TQM. This will have a direct negative impact on customer satisfaction. 6.2 Improvements So far various fields of improvement have been addressed in “5.4 Possible fields of development within the field of TQM”. In this section different improvements that have already taken place and will take place and the respective effects are briefly addressed. Since the first ideas of moving from ISO 9001 to a more quality orientated thinking, as TQM can be understood, several changes have been initiated. The most significant one is the shift in attitude, which is underway along with a change in generation (new appointments), namely the General Manager and the Technical Manager. Now senior management has the awareness of all of the requirements of TQM, and in a top down approach changes can be implemented. But adopting this awareness by the whole organisation is surely a long-term objective. As the awareness of TQM is lived by management, it will hopefully be adopted by all employees. This would result in improved processes and therefore also in increased quality of the product as purchased by the customers. Several changes have already taken place, and short-term improvements became visible. In the following paragraphs some of these changes will be highlighted. These have not only had a positive impact but also contributed towards adopting the TQM mentality throughout the company and all employees. The short term improvements of the already implemented job rotation are the exposure of individual employees to a variety of jobs. It is a real learning experience that helps to develop different skills. Less monotony and the feeling that they are of 66 better use for the company are the benefits for the worker. The benefit for the company is to determine where each worker performs best and if necessary to change his / her position. Further it gives the company more flexibility. If more work has to be done in one department and less in another one, workers can easily be moved. The same is applicable for holiday replacements. The first quality circles have already led to cross-functional discussions and the diameter of the wire has been slightly modified in order to guarantee a better spooling process. These few changes already had some positive effects on the employees and the company. Employees get the feeling that they do not only have to do what they are told. Their opinion is important and everybody has the opportunity to initiate change. Encouraging and listening to the individual will also increase identification and loyalty with the company in the long-term. Improved working processes and better cross-functional understanding are the benefits for the company. 67 CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Due to the increasing globalisation of markets and the rapid development of telecommunication and transport systems, today’s organisations are faced with stronger competition than ever before. Consequently organisations increasingly focus on customer satisfaction as a means of securing a competitive advantage. One way to achieve sustainable competitiveness is an emphasis on quality products and/or services. Quality has emerged as a strategic competitive tool for organisational success and organisations have come up with several quality concepts (Magd & Curry, 2003: 244). In this thesis TQM and the ISO 9000 series have been discussed in the context of a medium sized production company. The historical developments of both have been very different. The philosophy of Total Quality Management goes back to the first concepts that have been developed by the so called TQM gurus. The concepts are still very much the same and applicable today. The ISO 9000 series has been subject to various adjustments. The latest revision gets closer to the concept of TQM. But it is a QMS with an external certification, whereas TQM is a philosophy. As the ISO 9000 has adopted some of the aspects of TQM, the latest revision can serve as a basis for TQM implementation. At the beginning the Fliess Company was not prepared to implement ISO 9000, but as the market pressure became inescapable it had to be done. Throughout the years the company more and more adopted the QMS mentality. In 2006 the decision was made to move even further and to implement TQM. The existing norm-conform QMS was the basis, and the company started to adopt the philosophy of TQM. This project is initiated by the top management that also stays in charge of the realisation. Obviously the size of the company plays an important role for the implementation of TQM. In big organisations the distance between top management and the operational level is much bigger than in small companies. Due to the size of the Fliess Company the implementation is easier than at a larger enterprise. All aspects regarding leadership, employee participation, etc. can be implemented easier. Management is in contact with the operational level and hence can strongly influence the process throughout the whole company. So far a number of improvements have already been implemented and show the first positive results. 68 But TQM is a very complex and fragile model. When it is implemented correctly it will help organisations to gain sustainable competitive advantages as it reduces costs, enhances professionalism and facilitates a new business culture. In order to pursue these results, organisations must not give up but need to have an agenda for this long term objective. Should such an objective not be realised, the danger of demotivating employees is very high. But as competition is increasing the focus on quality will become even more important than it is today. Consequently, organisations can no longer neglect the topic of quality, and TQM is a very powerful philosophy that creates winning organisations. Fliess will therefore continue with the implementation of the TQM philosophy at all levels of the organisation. 69 List of Sources: Anderson, J.C., Rungtusanatham, M. & Schroeder, R.G. 1994. A Theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Academy of Management Review, 19 (3), 472-509. Atkinson, P.E. 1990. Creating Culture Change. Kempston: IFS. Beckford, J. 1998. Quality. 2nd edition. London: Routledge. Boys, K., Karapetrovic, S. & Wilcock, A. 2004. Is ISO 9004 a path to business excellence? International journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21 (8), 841–860. Crosby, P.B. 1979. Quality is free: the art of making quality certain. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Dale, B. & Cooper, C. 1992. Total Quality and Human Resources. Oxford: Blackwell. Deming, W.E. 1986. Out of Crisis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Centre for Advanced Engineering Study. Dean, J. & Bowen, D. 1994. Managing theory and total Quality. Academy of Management Review, 19 (3), 392-418. DIN EN ISO 9000: 2000. Berlin: Beuth Verlag. Ebel, B. 2001. Qualitätsmanagement. Herne/Berlin: nwb. Eom, B.S. & Stought, D. 1995. Executive Suport Systems: A key for enhancing senior executive leadership in a total Quality Management. The Executive Journal, 11 (2), 27-34. Feigenbaum, A.V. 1991. Total Quality Control. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Fox, J.F. 1994. Quality Assurance Management. London: Chapman & Hall. Hellriegel, D., Jackson, S.E. & Slocum, J.W. 1999. Management. 8th edition. Cincinnati: International Thomson Publishing. Hongyi, S., Sapphire, L. & Karis, H. 2004. The Trajectory of implementing ISO: 9000 standards versus Total Quality Management in Europe. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21 (2), 131–153. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:PDCA.gif, accessed 08.08.2006. 70 http://www.iso.org, accessed 25.07.2006. http://www.iso.ch, accessed 25.07.2006. Ishikawa, K. 1985. What is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way. London: Prentice-Hall. International Organization for Standardization. 1994. ISO 8402 1994. Quality Management and Quality Assurance – Vocabulary. Geneve. International Organization for Standardization. 2000a. ISO 9001: Quality Management Systems: Requirements. ISO, Geneva. International Organization for Standardization. Management Systems: Requirements. Geneva. 2000b. ISO 9004: Quality Juran, J.M. & Gryna, F.M. 1993. Quality Planning and Analysis, 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Juran, J.M. & Gryna, F.M. 1988. Juran’s Quality Control Handbook. 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Juran, J.M. 1992. Quality by design. New York: The Free Press. Jeffries, D., Evans, B. & Reynolds, P. 1996. Training for TQM. 2nd edition. London: Kogan Page. Jones, R., Arndt, G. & Kustin, R. 1997. ISO 9000 among Australian companies. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 14 (7), 650-660. Kamiske, G.F. 1996. ABC of Total Quality Management. München: Hanser. Kemp, S. 2006. Quality management. New York: McGraw-Hill. Levitt, T. 1983. The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 92-102. Magd, H. & Curry A. 2003. ISO 9000 and TQM: are they complementary or contradictory to each other? The TQM Magazine, 15 (4), 244-256. Malorny, C. 2002. TQM. 2nd edition. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poechel. Oakland, J. 2003. Total Quality Management: Text and Cases. 2nd edition. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Oakland, J. 1992. Total Quality Management. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. 71 Omachonu, V.K. & Ross, J.E. 1994. Principles of Total Quality. Delray Beach: St. Lucie Press. Pfitzinger, E. 2002. Der Weg von DIN EN ISO 9000 zu Total Quality Management. 2nd edition. Berlin, Wien, Zürich: Deutsches Institut für Normung. Pycraft, M., Singh, H. & Phihlela, K. 2000. Operations Management. Southern African edition, South Africa: Pearson Education. Rao, A., Carr, L.P., Kopp, R.J., Martin, J., Rafii, F. & Schesinger, P.F. 1996. Total Quality Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Sousa, R. & Voss, C. 2002. Quality Management re-visited. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 91-109. Stevenson, H.T. & Barnes, C.F. 2002. What industrial marketers need to know now about ISO 9000 certification: a review, update, and integration with marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 695-703. Stockmann, R. 2002. Qualitätsmanagement und Evaluation. CEval Arbeitspapiere Nr. 3. Saarbrücken: Centrum für Evaluation – Universität des Saarlandes. Stowasser, J. M., Petsching, M. & Skutsch, F. 1980. der kleine Stowasser, LateinischDeutsches Schulwörterbuch. München: Oldenbourg Schulbuchverlag. Sun, H., Sapphire, L. & Ho, K. 2003. The trajectory of implementing ISO 9000 standards versus Total Quality Management in Europe. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 21 (2), 131-153. Thomson, A.A. & Strickland, A. J. 2003. Strategic Management. 13th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. von Ahsen, A. 1996. Total Quality Management. Frankfurt / Main: Peter Lang. Wadsworth, H.M., Stephens, K.S. & Godfrey, A.B. 2002. Modern Methods for Quality Control and Improvement. 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Zink, K.J. 2004. TQM als integratives Managementkonzept. 2nd edition. München: Hanser. 72 Appendix A: Schematical Illustration of the Production 73 Appendix B: New Fliess Box
© Copyright 2024