W est Nile Virus: How to address the „virus d‘jour“

Life. Made better.
West Nile Virus:
How to address the „virus d‘jour“
Thomas R.Kreil,Ph.D.
Global Pathogen Safety, Director
Æ on behalf ofthe
PPTA „Viral Safety W orking Group“
West Nile Virus,W N V
• History (1)
– 1937:Isolated from the blood of afebrilewoman,
West Nile district of Uganda
– 1957:Recognized as the cause of severe meningoencephalitis
in elderly patients during an outbreak in Israel
– 1996:First outbreak in Europe, approx. 450 casesin Romenia
– 1999:First detection inthe United States of America,
approx. 60 cases on the East Coast
– 2002:Epidemic of unprecedented size in the US
West Nile Virus,W N V
• History (2):
2002 US epidemic
– 3873 human cases reported to CDC / Arbonet,including
246 human fatalities (CDC, Dec. 31, 2002)
– Virus transmission through
• Solid organ transplantation
• Blood transfusion (M M W R [2002] 51(39): 879)
• { Breast milk, possible (MMWR [2002] 51(39): 877-878) }
– Laboratory acquired (2 cases: M M W R [2002] 51 (50):1133)
West Nile Virus,W N V:
transmission through solid organ transplants
• CDC investigation
West Nile Virus infection in organ donor and transplant
recipients (MM W R [2002] 51: 790)
– Four organ recipients from a single donor all developed
clinical WNV infection
– Donor`s pre-donation blood contained WN V
West Nile Virus,W N V:
transmission through blood products
• Safety ofthe blood supply ?
– (Labile) blood products for transfusion
• Erythrocytes (red blood cells)
• Thrombocytes
• Fresh-frozen plasma (FFP)
– (Stable) blood products (= plasma derivatives)
West Nile Virus,W N V:
transmission through labile blood products
•„Estimated risk of WNV transimission through blood
transfusion during an epidemicin Queens, New York City“
BJ Biggerstaff & LR Petersen, Transfusion [2002] 42: 1019
– <2.7 /10.000 risk oftransmission from a single unit
(worst-case: generated during a recognized epidemic,
assuming 100% transmission from viremic donor)
– „...lack of data about blood transfusion-related flavivirus
transmission ...“ Æ published before it ever happened !!
West Nile Virus,W N V:
transmission through labile blood products
•„Investigations of WestNile Virus Infections in
Recipientsof Blood Transfusions“
M M W R [2002] 51:973
– 6 out of 33 cases: evidence for transmission available,
others still underinvestigation
– Components identified: FFP, red blood cells
West Nile Virus,W N V:
the FDAs response
• October 3,2002
Information about West Nile Virus and Blood Safety
• October 25,2002: Guidance for Industry
„Recom mendations for the Assessment of Donor Suitability and
Blood and Blood Product Safety in Cases of Known or Suspected
West Nile Virus Infection“
– Donor deferral
– Retrieval, and quarantine
West Nile Virus,W N V:
the FDAs response
• October 25,2002: Guidance for Industry
Recommendations forthe Assessment ofDonor Suitability and
Blood and Blood Product Safety in Cases of Known or Suspected
West Nile Virus Infection
„FDA has reviewed the viralreduction processes in place
for all plasma derivatives. The methods in place have
been validated to inactivate flaviviruses related to WN V.“
West Nile Virus,W N V:
the FDAs response
• FDA W orkshop on Development of Donor Screening
Assays forWest Nile Virus, November 4 & 5, 2002
Goals and objectives
1) WNV pathogenicity and epidemiology in the U.S.
2) Methodologies suitable for screening of WN V in donors
3) Transmission to recipients ofblood, or human cells,tissues,
and cellular ortissue based products (HCT/Ps)
4) WNV screening assays for future large-scale implementation
5) Issues relevanttothe implementation of WNV tests
6) FDA’s expectations for licensure ofW N V test
7) Strategies forinactivation of WNV
West Nile Virus,W N V:
FDA workshop, November 2002
• 3) Transmission to recipients of blood, or human cells,
tissues, and cellular ortissue based products (HCT/Ps)
– Solid organ transplantation
– Blood transfusion
Æ Donor deferral criteria (FD A guidance)
West Nile Virus,W N V:
FDA workshop, November 2002
• 7) Strategies forinactivation of WN V
– (Labile) blood components fortransfusion
– (Stable) plasma-derivatives
West Nile Virus,W N V:
FDA workshop, November 2002
• 7) Strategies forinactivation of WN V:
(Labile) blood components for transfusion
– Cerus:
Psoralenes
– Vitex:
Inactines
– Gambro: Riboflavine + light
West Nile Virus,W N V:
FDA workshop, November 2002
•Inactivation of WN V in (labile) blood components
Preliminary Results
Volume
treated
Initial
Post
treatment
WNV Titer
-
Log -
Comments
Reduction
WNV Titer
Platelets
Platelets
RBC
RBC
(mL)
(pfu/mL)
300
5.4 x 10
300
Platelets:
RBC:
9.1 x 10
(pfu/mL)
5
5
<1
<1
(N=2)
> 5.7
> 5.7
> 6.0
> 6.0
150 µM amotosalen and 3 J/cm2 UVA
200 µM S-303
No recoverable
virus in 1 mL in 2
of 2 experiments
No recoverable
virus in 1 mL in 2
of 2 experiments
West Nile Virus,W N V:
FDA workshop, November 2002
• 7) Strategies forinactivation of WN V:
(Stable) blood products,i.e.plasma-derivatives
– Experience of the plasma proteins industry,
based on the „model virus concept“
• CPMP guidance: CP M P/B WP/268/95
„...any virus used in a validation study is actually a model virus.“
– Verification (N OT: validation)studies
West Nile Virus,and relatives
–Flaviviridae,Flavivirus
– West Nile Virus (W N V)
» US 2002: 3873 clinical cases, 246 fatalities (CDC, Dec. 31, 2002)
– St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV)
» US 1975: 1800 clinical cases, 130 fatalities
– Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV)
» Austria (8 mio.):up to 600 cases per year, 2% lethality
– Flaviviridae,Pestivirus
– Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV)
– Flaviviridae,Hepacivirus
– Hepatitis C virus
– Togaviridae,Alphavirus
– Sindbisvirus (SIN V)
West Nile Virus,and relatives: modelviruses
Family [-viridae]
Genus [-virus]
HSA (3.5% - 25%) pasteurization
HSA (5% - 25%) pasteurization
F VIII solvent-detergent
ivIg solvent-detergent
FEIBA vapor heating
HCV
FlaviHepaci(>5.0 *)
(>5.0 *)
-
BVDV
FlaviPesti>6.2 / >6.1
>6.8 / >4.9
>5.2
>4.9
>5.1
* B Horowitz & E Ben-Hur, Ann. Med. (2000) vol 32, p 475
SINV
TogaAlpha- / >5.5
TBEV
FlaviFlavi
>7.0 / >7.6
>5.2
>7.0
West Nile Virus,and relatives:
model viruses, and WN V for „verification“
Family [-viridae]
Genus [-virus]
HSA (3.5% - 25%) pasteurization
HSA (5% - 25%) pasteurization
F VIII solvent-detergent
ivIg solvent-detergent
FEIBA vapor heating
HCV
FlaviHepaci(>5.0 *)
(>5.0 *)
-
BVDV
FlaviPesti>6.2 / >6.1
>6.8 / >4.9
>5.2
>4.9
>5.1
SINV
TogaAlpha- / >5.5
>5.2
* B Horowitz & E Ben-Hur, Ann. Med. (2000) vol. 32, p. 475
TBEV
WNV
FlaviFlaviFlavi
Flavi
>7.0 / >7.6 >7.1 / >8.3
>8.3 / >8.0
>5.9
>6.0
>7.0
>8.1
West Nile Virus,and relatives /„model viruses“
P a s te u riz a tio n o f Hu m a n Alb u m in
8
log10 [TC ID50/ml]
BV D V 3.5%
7
BV D V 25%
6
TB EV 3.5%
TB EV 25%
5
SINV 25%
W NV 3.5%
4
W NV 25%
3
2
limit o f d e te ctio n
1
0
0
100
200
300
400
incubation at 60°C [min]
500
600
West Nile Virus,and relatives /„model viruses“
Vapor Heating of FEIBA
8
60min
80
7
70min
temperature profile
510min
60
TBEV (m2;99)
5
TBEV (92)
60min
4
BVDV (m2;01)
BVDV (m2;99)
40
SINV (m3;88)
3
WNV (7%,02)
WNV (8%,02)
2
1
20
limit of detection
0
0
lyo
0
200
400
time of heating [min]
600
Temperature [°C]
log10 [TCID50/ml]
6
West Nile Virus,and relatives /„model viruses“
Solvent Detergent treatment of ivIg (only 5% !)
8
WNV run 1
WNV run 2
BVDV run 1
BVDV run 2
log10 [TCID50/ml]
6
4
2
0
B
0
10
limit of detection
B
B
20
30
BB
40
duration of SD treatment [min]
50
60
West Nile Virus „verification“ study
• Asahi 15 N nanofiltration of α1-Proteinase Inhibitor
Assay:N GI, SuperQuant™ RT PCR Assay forW N V
spiked alpha-1-PI
filtered alpha-1-PI
reduction factor
WNV (log10 genome copies/mL)
>9.0
< 0.0
> 9.0
WNV Inactivation during HPPS Pasteurization
8.0
7.0
Log10 PFU WN
6.0
5.0
≥ 7.3 log10 reduction
4.0
n=3
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0
Limit of detection
5
Hours
10
WNV Inactivation during IGIV-S/D
TNBP/Cholate Treatment
8
Log10 PFU WNV
7
6
> 5.9 log10 reduction (setpoint)
> 6.2 log10 reduction (half conc.)
5
n=3
0.3% TNBP/0.2% Cholate
0.15% TNBP/0.1% Cholate
4
3
All values were at the
limit of detection
2
1
0
0
2
4
Hours
6
Pasteurisation Inactivates Viruses
(heat treatment in stabilised aqueous solution at 60°C)
Beriglobin P (IMIG)
10 ]
7
6
Virus titre [log
5
BVDV
WNV
YFV
SFV
4
3
2
Detection Limit WNV
1
Detection limit
0
0
2
4
6
Pasteurisation time [h]
8
10
Pasteurisation Inactivates Viruses
(heat treatment in stabilised aqueous solution at 60°C)
Gammar P (IVIG)
10 ]
7
6
Virus titre [log
5
BVDV
WNV
YFV
SFV
4
3
2
Detection Limit WNV
1
Detection limit
0
0
2
4
6
Pasteurisation time [h]
8
10
West Nile Virus,W N V
• FDA workshop: November 4 & 5, 2002
FDA /Final Guidance for Industry (October 2002):
Recommendations forthe Assessment ofDonor Suitability and
Blood and Blood Product Safety in Cases of Known or Suspected
West Nile Virus Infection:
„FDA has reviewed the viralreduction processesin place for all
plasma derivatives. The methods in place have been validated to
inactivate flaviviruses related to W N V.“
West Nile Virus,W N V
• FDA workshop :November 4 & 5, 2002
– „The W N V data presented supportthe FD A‘s conclusion,in
thatit „verifies“ that WNV does not behave differently than
other flaviviruses.“
– „The conceptof using a range of physicochemically diverse
model viruses forthe validation ofvirus reduction steps has also
been verified,inthatthe behaviour of a virus ofinterest,i.e.
W N V, has been adequately predicted !“
West Nile Virus,W N V
• A successful precedentforthe collaboration of
– Regulators
– Academia
– Patient organizations
– Industry
Result: efficient use of ressources, no unnecessary constraints;
Æ to the ultimate benefit of concerned patients !!
Thank you !
This paper was produced for a meeting organized by Health & Consumer Protection DG and represents the views of its author on the
subject. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of
the Commission's or Health & Consumer Protection DG's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data
included in this paper, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof.