+ Book Review: Why We’re Not Emergent by DeYoung and Kluck Defenders Series #10 2/17/2013 + The Emerging Church: It’s Something We’ll Have to Deal With n James S. Bielo, Assistant Professor of Anthropology at Miami University: n “In short, between 1995 and 2005, a new, viable, amorphous form of Evangelical identity appeared.” n “…the problems Emerging Evangelicals have internalized and introduced into public discourse will powerfully shape American Christian subjectivities and institutions well into the future.” + The Emerging Church: In a Nutshell n The Emergent Church is a movement that: Has developed from within Protestant Evangelical Churches. n It began as a movement of churches re-examining their practices to attract a younger generation and address their perceived grievances with the Evangelical Church, n but has now developed into a new form or sect within Christianity altogether, rejecting or modifying many traditional Christian doctrines in unacceptable or heretical ways. n n Based on these doctrines and the growing popularity of the movement’s leaders, the Emergent Church is an incredibly dangerous sect. + Leaders of the Emergent Church Rob Bell Brian McLaren + Leaders of the Emergent Church n Other Leaders or Figures of Note: n Chris Seay, Pastor, Ecclesia (Houston, TX) n Doug Pagitt, Pastor, Solomon’s Porch (Minneapolis, MN) n Tony Jones, Theologian-in-Residence, Solomon’s Porch (Minneapolis, MN) n Spencer Burke, Fmr. Pastor, Mariner’s Church (Irvine, CA) n Peter Rollins, Founder, ikon Spiritual Commune (Belfast, Northern Ireland) n Steve Chalke MBE, ordained Baptist Minister, church.co.uk founder (London, England) + Defining the Emergent Church n You might be an Emergent Church member if you hear these buzzwords frequently: n Conversation/Dialogue/Discourse n Community/Living Communally n Missional/Living Missionally n Incarnational/Living Incarnationally n Mosaic n Holistic n Narrative/Text/Deconstruct(ion) n Relevant n Mystery/(Radical) Uncertainty n Praxis/Orthopraxy + Defining the Emergent Church n The Emergent Church’s value priority appears to be: n Mysticism > Certainty n Experience/Emotion > Truth/Knowledge n Social Activism > Individual Growth n Community > Individual n Belonging > Believing n Being part of the “community” is more important than what you believe. n They have reacted to culture to the extent that they are now both “in” and “of” the world. + Why We’re Not Emergent by Kevin DeYoung and Ted Kluck, Moody Pub. (2008) + Authors n Kevin DeYoung n Pastor, University Reformed Church (East Lansing, MI) n Author of Why We Love the Church (2010 CT Book Award), Don’t Call it a Comeback: The Old Faith for a New Day & 10 other titles n Member of The Gospel Coalition + Authors n Ted Kluck n Began as a Sportswriter n Published in ESPN The Magazine n Coached High School Football, n Trained as a Pro Wrestler, n Taught College Writing + Emergent Church Issues Exposed in WWNE n Is God Knowable? n The Celebration of Doubt n Is Truth Knowable? n The “Irrelevancy of Inerrancy” n Emphasizing Practice over Belief n The Historical Jesus n Rejecting Substitutionary Atonement n Rejecting Hell n Rejecting the Uniqueness of Salvation in Christ Alone + Emergent Church Issues Exposed in WWNE n Is God Knowable? n The Celebration of Doubt n Is Truth Knowable? n The “Irrelevancy of Inerrancy” n Emphasizing Practice over Belief n The Historical Jesus n Rejecting Substitutionary Atonement n Rejecting Hell n Rejecting the Uniqueness of Salvation in Christ Alone + The Emergent Error Concerning Salvation & The Cross n “God’s grace, God’s forgiveness…the free gift of salvation…[is] a footnote to a gospel that is much richer, grander, and more alive, a gospel that calls you to become a disciple and to disciple others, in authentic community, for the good of the world.” McLaren n The emphasis here isn’t on you or God but on “authentic community” and “the good of the world.” + The Emergent Error Concerning Salvation & The Cross n Steve Chalke (in a book favored by many Emergent thinkers, including McLaren): n Theory of Penal Substitutionary Atonement constitutes “cosmic child abuse.” n This theory is “twisted…morally dubious…makes a mockery of Jesus’ own teaching” n Tony Jones: “this version of atonement theory [is] neither intellectually compelling, spiritually compelling, nor in keeping with the Biblical narrative.” n Instead, the cross is a picture of the failure of God’s love and His disappointment in the fact that we don’t live “incarnationally.” + The Emergent Error Concerning Salvation & The Cross n Biblical n Isaiah References Answering this Heresy: 53:5 – Substitutionary Atonement n Isaiah 53:10 – God was pleased in the crucifixion n John 15:13 – Jesus laying down His life for His friends is the greatest love (He wasn’t “abused” by God the Father) n Romans 5:8 – “God demonstrates His love for us in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.” + Conclusion n This book was published in 2008. n There has been a substantial amount of movement the last 4 years. n Bell’s Love Wins – an out and out rejection of the Doctrine of Hell. n The Voice – the Emergent Bible
© Copyright 2024