10/5/2012 WHY AGENTS, UNDERWRITERS & AUDITORS APPROACH WORK COMP DIFFERENTLY Christopher J. Boggs, CPCU, ARM, ALCM, LPCS, AAI, APA, CWCA, CRIS, AINS Director of Education – Insurance Journal Academy of Insurance AGENDA FOR THIS SESSION Part I: Employer (and Insurer) Responsibility in Workers’ Compensation Part II: What Happens When the “Alternate Employer Endorsement” Isn’t Used PART I: FOR WHOM IS THE EMPLOYER RESPONSIBLE “It Depends on…” Entity Type: Statutes: Relationships: 1 10/5/2012 ENTITY TYPE AND “EMPLOYEES” “Employees” must be protected by WC Discover who is an “employee” by knowing who the employer is. All employers are “Persons” Natural person employers Legal person employers STATUTES AND “EMPLOYEES” Forty-four states mandate who is responsible for whom in a sub-contract relationship Not limited to the construction industry RELATIONSHIPS LEADING TO “EMPLOYEE” STATUS “Independent Contractors” or De Facto Employees A “special” relationship (aka: “borrowed servant”) 2 10/5/2012 THE MAIN PROBLEM Failure to learn of all these relationships! ACORD application only asks for limited information Proprietary application may not be any broader AUDITOR’S QUEST Develop key questions based on: What the insured does The entity type Develop procedural questions regarding: The use of “non employees” COI management REMEMBER!! Agents may not know to ask for the information you desire! Underwriters may not ask! 3 10/5/2012 WHAT IS THE RESULT?? YOU!!! (your employer) will be responsible for paying workers’ compensation benefits to an individual: You were not aware existed For whom you collected NO premium PART II: WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE “ALTERNATE EMPLOYER ENDORSEMENT” ISN’T USED A “Borrowed Servant” is: A worker under the ‘absolute right of control’ of an entity that is not his direct employer. Present when an “employer” beyond or in addition to the direct employer can be held financially responsible for a worker’s injury because the relationship between the “employer” and worker involves control over activities at some level. A “BORROWED SERVANT” IS CREATED BY CONTROL Notice that a “borrowed servant” is a special relationship not created by a direct contract of hire or statute. Created almost exclusively by the right of control. Eleven (11) “tests” to prove “right of control” 4 10/5/2012 THE 11 TESTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The entity controls the manner in which the work is performed; The place of performance is delineated by the entity or person; The time of performance is mandated; Details of the performance are mandated; The supervisor is a direct employee of the employer who hired the worker; The work is being done exclusively for the entity that hired the worker; If these first six point towards a “borrowed servant” / special employer relationship, we move to the next five! THE 11 TESTS – CONT’D 7. The presumed special employer has the right to discharge the worker; 8. The special employer has the obligation of paying the worker; 9. The direct employer “terminated” the relationship with the worker; 10. The presence of a contract or other special documentation; and 11. The lent employee is a specialist (a “negative” test). RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE “BORROWED SERVANT” Special employers owe the same duties of protections to their special employees (“borrowed servants”) as is owed to direct employees The “putative” employer must provide workers’ compensation protection to their “borrowed servants” unless the direct employer extends coverage 5 10/5/2012 WHO PROVIDES COVERAGE No proof beyond the contract that the direct employer is providing protection: Dual employment may exist (depending on the state) Both parties may be called upon to respond You may have a reasonable argument to charge for the “borrowed servant” Alternate Employer Endorsement attached to the direct employer’s policy: It’s clear who is responsible for providing benefits Limits Work Comp recovery to the direct employer You should not charge the “Special Employer” for the “borrowed servant” COMMON “BORROWED SERVANT” SITUATIONS Temporary staffing operations Property management firms Employee hired by direct employer to work exclusively at a special employer’s location or job site(s) Contractual relationships between GCs and subcontractors (“insured contract” definition) BOOKS PUBLISHED 6 10/5/2012 CONTACT INFORMATION Christopher J. Boggs, CPCU,, ARM, ALCM, LPCS, AAI, APA, CWCA, CRIS, AINS Director of Education – Academy of Insurance 800-897-9965 x137 [email protected] 7
© Copyright 2024