 
        אור הצפון Ohr HaTzafon $ VOLUME 1:1 • TISHREI 5775 • BEIS HAKNESSES OF NORTH WOODMERE Ohr HaTzafon Beis Haknesses of North Woodmere Volume 1:1 Tishrei 5775 Beis Haknesses of North Woodmere 649 Hungry Harbor Road North Woodmere, NY 11581 www.bknw.org Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz, Rav and Mara D’Asra Editorial Team Moshe Buchbinder, General Editor Moshe Grushko, General Editor Tani Sussman, Publication Lead Rob Shur, Design and Layout www.rbscreative.com TABLE OF CONTENTS $ Editors’ Preface ........................................................... p. 6 דברי הרב How to Remember on the Day of Zichronos Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz ........................................................... p. 19 Sukkos - The “Yom Rishon”: Restoring Ourselves to the True Beginning Guest Contributor: Rabbi Shay Schachter ........................................................... p. 23 ראש השנה The Connection Between Chodesh Elul and the Yomim Tovim in Chodesh Tishrei: Insights From the S’fas Emes Elisha Graff ........................................................... p. Shitas Rashi on the Two Days of Rosh Hashana Eli Schiffmiller ........................................................... p. A Hole in “Holy”? The History and Meaning Behind an Enigmatic Prayer Gavri Butler ........................................................... p. Davening for Our Family Binyomin Pam ........................................................... p. Eating of Simanim on Rosh Hashana Joseph Etra ........................................................... p. Ahavas Yisroel Avi Davies ........................................................... p. Eating Prior to Tekiyas Shofar Elli Ganchrow ........................................................... p.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z3Y OHR HATZAFON • 27 31 39 49 53 61 65 אור הצפון The Sounding of the Shofar: Psychoacoustics and the Soul Dr. Richard Sidlow ........................................................... p. 71 Rosh Hashana: A day of Fear or a Day of Joy? Ethan Baraff ........................................................... p. 79 Malchios - Yearning to be in the Presence of The King Dr. Moshe Grushko ........................................................... p. 85 יום כיפור With Their Last Breath: Messages of Repentance, Prayer, and Charity from Selected Zava’ahs Scott Farrell ........................................................... p. 95 Teshuva, Geula and R’ Elazar ben Dordaya (and a little bit of Zechus Avos) Jeremy Herskowitz ........................................................... p. 99 Avaryanim and Knesses Yisrael Eitan Zerykier ........................................................... p. 107 The Sa’ir LaAzazel: A Process of Inspiration Moshe Buchbinder ........................................................... p. 111 סוכות Teishvu K’en Taduru: Treating the Sukkah as One’s Home Rabbi Yehuda Balsam ........................................................... Borrowed Sukkah vs. Borrowed Lulav Rabbi Yechiel Kalmenson ........................................................... Brachos on a Minhag Rabbi Shmuel Witkin ........................................................... From Huts to Heichal: Insights into Sukkos and Shemini Atzeres Michael Oppenheim ........................................................... OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z4Y p. 119 p. 123 p. 129 p. 133 TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי שמיני עצרת Shemini Atzeres: One Nation, One Land Ephraim Friedman ........................................................... p. 141 Is this Article Permitted in Ohr HaTzafon? Shemini Atzeres as a Separate Holiday or the Eighth Day of Sukkos Michael Gewirtz ........................................................... p. 151 דברי תורה בעברית בעניני סוכות בענין כוונה במצות ישיבה בסוכה Rabbi Yehuda Balsam ........................................................... p. 166 בענין סדר הברכות דקידוש בליל שני של סוכות Yoni Kirschner ........................................................... p. 170 בענין נשים בבנין הסוכה Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz ........................................................... p. 176  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z5Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Editors’ Preface This past year, 5774, will likely be remembered as a challenging yet inspirational year for Klal Yisrael. We were stunned and deeply hurt by the tragic events of the kidnapping and murder of Naftali Frankel, Gilad Shaer and Ayal Yifrach, (HY”D) and then further anguished by the loss of scores of our Chayalim and brethren in the ensuing battle for the safety of Eretz Yisrael. Many of us downloaded an app which sounded a siren every time a rocket was launched into Eretz Yisrael, triggering immediate Tehillim recitation and a deep sense of concern. Like never before, we in America felt an extreme sense of Achdus with our Brothers and Sisters in Eretz Yisrael. However, as Rabbi Lebowitz pointed out at the time, Tehillim and a deep sense of connection alone were simply not enough of a response. We felt we needed to do more as a Z’chus for the safety of our fellow Jews and a successful outcome in what will hopefully prove to be the Aschalta DeGeulah, the beginning of our ultimate redemption. The Yeshivos in Eretz Yisrael cancelled Bein Hazmanim vacation so that they could provide the Z’chus Limud Torah to the Chayalim who defend the land. They stood behind what we all know to be true – Hakadosh Baruch Hu alone provides for the safety of His people, and our Avodah is to learn Torah and follow His Mitzvos in order to earn this defense - Hashem Yilachem Lachem V’Atem Tacharishun. During this period of distress, we witnessed political boundaries of colors and categories melt away and a sprouting of Achdus that perhaps had not previously been achieved in our lifetimes. We in North Woodmere heard the message and were inspired to join in the cause. We responded by developing a serious Talmud Torah initiative of our own, the publication of Ohr HaTzafon. May the Divrei Torah of our community provide a Z’chus for the safety of all of Klal Yisrael around the world and the Toshvei Eretz Yisrael in particular. Since its inception in 2004, the Baalei Batim of the Beis Haknesses of North Woodmere have symbolized the highest level of devotion to the three pillars of Yahadus: Torah, Avodah and Gemilas Chassadim. Packed Shiurim, a deep commitment to Tefilah Bitzibur, and an ongoing stream of Chessed initiatives define our community. However, with this publication, we believe that the Baalei Batim of our Shul have once again elevated their own lofty bar by channeling the skills and insights that they have developed in a lifetime of Limud Torah to the higher cause of Harbatzas Torah – teaching Torah. As you will see, each D’var Torah in Ohr HaTzafon is a gem. They span all walks of Derech HaLimud, from Halacha to Machshava and Lamdus. Some are peppered with Mussar and Divrei Hisorerus while others inspire with tales from our Gedolim. At times you may shlug your thumb at the depth of analysis and at others you may choke back tears. What is common to all of them OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z6Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי is a high degree of thoughtfulness, a quest for Emes, and clarity of writing that demonstrates a huge effort by each of the authors. We are humbled to live among a community of such learned and devoted Talmidei Chachamim and cannot overstate how uplifted we are to know that this is where we are raising our children. To all of the authors who devoted substantial time and energy to contribute Divrei Torah to Ohr HaTzafon, thank you. This will forever be your publication and we wish you continued success in Harbatzas Torah, especially in future editions of Ohr HaTzafon. And to all of the wives and children that made this community project into a family priority by encouraging your husbands and fathers to be Marbitz Torah on such a grand scale, we applaud and thank you as well. Thank you to all of the sponsors of Ohr HaTzafon. Through your generous donations, the Shul was able to print several hundred copies of our inaugural publication and distribute them across our extended community. When one thinks about the future of each volume, and how many times each Sefer may potentially change hands and be learned, the thousands of hours of Harbatzas Torah that have been generated by your generosity are staggering. Thank you. Hinei KaChomer BiYad HaYotzer. Thank you to our layout editor, Rob Shur, who worked tirelessly to take the amazing Divrei Torah and prepare them for a beautiful publication. The Kavod HaTorah and aesthetic beauty of the publication are a testament to your expertise and efforts. Thank you to our friend and publisher Tani Sussman, who managed the publication and distribution of the Sefer. (If you think Tani is fun to have over for Shabbos lunch, you should try working with him.) Thank you to our friend Rabbi Yaakov Siegel, editor of Nitzachon, for his valuable guidance in helping us develop Ohr HaTzafon. Acharon Acharon Chaviv. To our Mara D’Asrah, Rabbi Lebowitz: Last year, we celebrated with you as you marked 3,000 Shiurim delivered on YU Torah. We beamed with pride as the Rosh Yeshiva, Rav Herschel Schachter Shlit”a, showered his praise upon you for all of your truly unique skills and tremendous accomplishments in Harbatzas Torah. However, we never gave you something that expresses how the community feels. Belatedly, here it is. The publication of Ohr HaTzafon demonstrates that we are learning from your example and internalizing your message of Mesiras Nefesh for Torah and Avodas Hashem. Now, as we celebrate the 10 year anniversary of our Shul together, we are proud to reflect on this milestone which is just one of many symbols that you are achieving your goal of inspiring your community to the point where Torah is truly Chakuk Al Luach Libeinu. May the words of Torah written herein by your community, your Talmidim, serve as a Z’chus for you and your continued success in elevating our Kehilla and all of Klal Yisrael. Thank you for everything. The Ohr HaTzafon Team  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z7Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z8Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי יזכר אלהים גבוריו-את נשמות בניו חילי צבא הגנה לישראל May Hashem remember the souls of His heroic children: The fighters of the Israel Defense Forces  בהחלצם לעזרת העם,מנשרים קלו ומאריות גברו .והרוו בדמם הטהור את רגבי אדמת קדשנו זכר עקדתם ומעשה גבורתם לא יסופו מאתנו לעולמים They were quicker than eagles and stronger than lions as they volunteered to assist the nation, and they saturated our holy land with their pure blood. The memory of their self-sacrifice and heroic deeds will never disappear from us. תהי נשמתם צרורה בצרור החיים In memory of the three boys who united our nation, and all the chayalim who ultimately gave their lives for it and for Eretz Yisrael, “”קול דמי אחיך צועקים עלי מן האדמה May their families be comforted among the mourners of Zion and Yerushalayim And in honor of everyone who contributed to this outstanding effort $ Avi and Yael Eisenberg and Family In honor of Rabbi Lebowitz, the editors and authors of Ohr HaTzafon whose passion for harbatzas Torah evident in their excitement for this wonderful project May they continue to be inspirations to the entire community $ Elli and Brina Ganchrow We extend a hearty yasher koach to all those who contributed to Ohr HaTzafon And a special yasher koach to the editors for spearheading this impressive undertaking We are proud to be a part of a kehillah that places such an emphasis on limud and harbatzas Torah $ Daniella & Elisha Graff & Family In loving memory of our grandparents, may their neshamos have an aliya from the divrei Torah published in this journal: Marvin & Renee Herskowitz Izzy & Helen Popowitz Ceil Rosenzweig And, yibadel l’chaim, in honor of our grandparents who are such a special part of our lives: Sidney & Gloria Gettenberg Chazan David Rosenzweig And in the zechus that there should be a yeshua in Eretz Yisrael and geula for Am Yisrael $ Adina, Jeremy, Ayala, Yaira, Azriel and Noam Herskowitz L’ilui nishmat the kedoshim In memory of all of our brothers who have given their lives to protect their fellow citizens, Eretz Yisrael, and the greater Am Yisrael. The learning of this sefer should be an aliyah for their neshamot and a source of nechama to all of their families who will have to endure life without their fathers, brothers, sons, and friends. May the zechut of the kedoshim who were killed while being mekadesh shem shamayim help hasten the coming of Mashiach bimheyra beyamenu bekarov! $ Avishai and Elisheva Neuman and Family In Honor of Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz And the entire Beis Haknesses of North Woodmere May you continue to be role models of Torah-dedicated life engaged in contemporary society $ Michael & Aviva Oppenheim תלמוד תורה כנגד כולם In recognition of the first publication of the BKNW Ohr HaTzafon Torah Journal In memory of our dear grandparents whose commitment to the study and support of Torah continues to inspire us לע”נ רבקה בת יעקב אפרים הכהן ע”ה יצחק בן אברהם נפתלי הלוי ע”ה פעסל בת אלתר אליקים געצל ע”ה מאיר יהודה בן אליהו ע”ה לע”נ פרידה ראשא בת זלמן ע”ה ר’ משה שמואל בן שלמה הלוי ע”ה לע”נ נפתלי צבי בן אברהם יצחק ע”ה $ Ilana and Ephraim Friedman and Family In honor of the editors and authors for their hard work, dedication, and expertise in producing this magnificent journal $ Elana and Aryeh Lebowitz In honor of The “Box Chaburah” and their spouses For delivering delicious kemach and delightful Torah $ Eitan and Rina Zerykier לעילוי נשמת בתיה חיה חוה בת שמואל מרדכי נחום נפתלי בן ישראל יצחק $ Mr. and Mrs. Alter Glass and Family Mazal Tov to all the contributors and the entire community on this great accomplishment L’zecher Nishmat our beloved grandfathers: ברוך בן אברהם דוד אריה אליקום בן יהושע מנחם אברהם בן חיים אריה לייב בן שרגא פייוול $ Rachel and Shragi Portal and Family דברי הרב $ How to Remember on the Day of Zichronos Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz A $ s an introduction to this remarkable journal I would like to share and paraphrase an approach that Rav Aharon Lichtenstein שליט”א takes (By His Light pgs. 182-201) toward the goals of the ימים נוראים. In his caption to הלכות תשובה, the  רמב”םwrites: .מצות עשה אחת והיא שישוב החוטא מחטאו לפני ה’ ויתודה There is one mitzvah contained in Hilchot Teshuva, and that is for a sinner to repent his sins in front of Hashem and confess. The  רמב”םclearly formulates  תשובהas a method of addressing sin. When a person sins against God, he must do תשובה. This is what we call “repentance” in English. Rav Lichtenstein however, examines  תשובהnot as repentance, but as return. This dual meaning of  תשובהreflects itself in the different ways we observe  ראש השנהand יום הכיפורים, both of which are ostensibly days of תשובה. While  יום הכיפוריםis all about  תשובהfrom a sin (repentance),  ראש השנהis all about returning to an awareness and ongoing relationship with Hashem. If we have to identify what we are trying to overcome with this second form of תשובה, returning to an awareness of Hashem, it is the sin of שכחה (forgetting) – a general apathy and indifference, a willingness to just look away and divert our focus from Hashem. When viewed on a more detailed level, the sin of “forgetting” our relationship with Hashem can occur on three distinct levels: Level 1: Totally Unaware First, a person is sometimes totally oblivious to God’s existence. Such a person doesn’t recognize Hashem’s presence in this world and is therefore an  אפיקורסof the highest order. He would obviously completely disregard מצוות, and in all likelihood would not be sitting in Shul on  ראש השנהor any other day and we will therefore not focus on this type of person. Rabbi Lebowitz has been the Rabbi of BKNW since its inception in 2004. The Rabbi and Elana have five children: Yonah, Yisrael, Zecharia, Daniel and Chani.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 19 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Level 2: Diversion of Focus Second, there are those who don’t totally forget, but have what we would refer to in  הלכהas a היסח הדעת. These are people that know about Hashem’s existence and believe in God. They may know many details of the עיקרי האמונה (fundamental principles of belief) and תורה ומצוות. If we were to test them they would score very well for their knowledge. But their minds and focus are somewhere else. Their attention is not directed toward Hashem. The גמרא in  מגילה דף יחconsiders somebody who remembers  עמלקbut doesn’t actively bring them to mind by reading about them, to be in violation of לא תשכח. The clear message is that  היסח הדעתis also considered to be שכחה. We have examples of  היסח הדעתin several areas of הלכה. The יד: רמב”ם הלכות תפילין דwrites: חייב אדם “ – למשמש בתפיליו כל זמן שהם עליו שלא יסיח דעתו מהם אפילו רגע אחדOne is obligated to touch his  תפיליןconstantly so that he not divert his attention from them for even a single moment”. There is also a  הלכהthat one cannot be  מסיח דעתfrom  תרומהand קדשים. We have to remain focused on the  תרומהfood and  קרבןmeat. There is a major difference, though, between the two examples of היסח הדעת. When it comes to תפילין, even if a person doesn’t focus on them, they retain their full קדושה, a sanctity greater than that of the  ציץthat the כהן גדול wears. The person who is  מסיח דעתhas treated his  תפיליןinappropriately, but the  תפיליןthemselves remain unaffected. When it comes to  תרומהand קדשים, on the other hand, if one diverts his attention from them ריש לקיש1 holds that the  תרומהand  קדשיםlose their קדושה. The  היסח הדעתresults in their becoming פסול. In the view of  ריש לקישthe  תרומהand  קדשיםbecome  פסולsimply because they weren’t treated with proper respect. The  היסח הדעתitself causes the פסול. When considering the two possible outcomes of a  היסח הדעתin הלכה, we must ask which of these types of  היסח הדעתcan be applied when one is guilty of diverting his attention from Hashem? What is the effect of  היסח הדעתof Hashem? Is it like  היסח הדעתof תפילין, where Hashem remains unaffected, or is it more like היסח הדעת of  תרומה וקדשיםwhere somehow the  קדושהis removed? At first glance it would seem obvious diverting focus from Hashem would yield a similar result to the result achieved when one is  מסיח דעתfrom תפילין. To say otherwise, that Hashem loses  קדושהas a result of our היסח הדעת, would seem to be blasphemous! However, Rav Lichtenstein points out, that the  מדרש תנחומאin  פרשת כי תצאrelates that as long as  עמלקexists the throne and name of Hashem are incomplete. We don’t know exactly what that means, but on some level, the existence of ’ חילול הis just that – taking away from the  קדושהof Hashem in this world. When we fail to recognize Hashem, we have desecrated Hashem. When we desecrate Hashem we rob the world of an increased level of השראת השכינה. So while Hashem may remain . פסחים דף לד1 OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 20 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי unaffected, our ability to perceive Him and His very presence in this world is deeply affected. Level 3: Failure to Appreciate There is a third type of forgetfulness. Even when we know that God exists, and we focus on Him, we sometimes fail to appreciate what Hashem’s presence actually means. We take it lightly. When relating to the רבונו של עולם, even when relating directly, we sometimes don’t appreciate what it means to relate to Hashem – to speak to Him three times a day every single day. As an example, we may all recite  ברכת המזוןafter a meal, but to what level does our recitation resemble a reverential encounter with the Almighty? I recall watching מורי ורבי הרב צבי שכטר  שליט”אrecite  ברכת המזוןwhen we were privileged to host him for a meal. The way he recited the words, slowly, with complete focus and concentration reflected a higher awareness of  הקב”הthan the rest of us who were also directly engaging in conversation with Hashem at the time, but on an entirely different level. The  סמ”גwrites in the introduction to his  ספרthat he had a dream before publishing the book that he had forgotten to include the most important – מצוה the negative commandment not to forget Hashem! He wasn’t going to include this  מצוהin his count of  מצוותbecause the  רמב”םdidn’t include it, but after the dream he had a change of heart and decided to include the  איסורof forgetting Hashem. In the actual  ספרhe describes the איסור: ומכאן אזהרה שלא יתגאה האדם במה שחננו הבורא הן בממון הן ביופי הן בחכמה אלא יש לו להיות ענ[י]ו מאד ושפל ברך לפני ה’ אלהים ואנשים ולהודות ) (סמ”ג מצות לא תעשה סד.לבוראו שחננו זה המעלה The Torah warns not to become arrogant with about God’s gifts to him, whether those gifts be monetary gifts, beauty or wisdom. Instead, one must be exceedingly humble and grateful to God and to other people, and acknowledge God for providing him with these wonderful things. The  סמ”גdoes not speak about totally forgetting God, nor even being  – מסיח דעתdiverting one’s attention. It is about appreciating the impact of God in his life. This type of  שכחהrelates to how a person divides credit for his accomplishments between himself and God, and whether the lion’s share of the credit goes to Hashem as it rightfully should. The response to  שכחהis obvious: זכירה. When discussing the  מצוהof זכירת ( שבתremembering Shabbos) the  רמב”ןwrites: ועל דרך הפשט אמרו (במכילתא כאן) שהיא מצוה שנזכור תמיד בכל יום את  כי בזכרנו אותו תמיד יזכור,השבת שלא נשכחהו ולא יתחלף לנו בשאר הימים  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 21 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון  והוא צוה אותנו, ונודה בכל עת שיש לעולם בורא,מעשה בראשית בכל עת  וזה עיקר גדול.באות הזה כמו שאמר (להלן לא יג) כי אות היא ביני וביניכם )ח:באמונת האל (רמב”ן על התורה שמות כ This simple explanation is that this is a mitzvah to constantly recall  תבשeach day of the week so that we not treat it like other days. Through remembering Shabbos constantly we will always recall the creation of the world and constantly acknowledge that the world has a Creator who has commanded us to observe Shabbos as a celebration of creation. This is a fundamental tenet of belief in God.” To remember means to constantly focus on – remembering  שבתis accomplished all week long. Remembering Hashem is accomplished in every moment of our lives. We have a tendency to get distracted. We aren’t involved in heresy, but we are involved in many things on a daily basis, some of which can take us away from our primary focus of ’עבודת ה. As we say in  זכרונותduring the  מוסףof ראש השנה: כי זוכר כל הנשכחות אתה “ – הוא מעולם ואין שכחה לפני כסא כבודךBecause you remember all that has been forgotten and there is nothing that you forget.” We know that Hashem does not forget us, and our very survival depends on it. Simple reciprocity demands that we focus on Hashem the way He focuses on us. It is my sincere hope that this journal deepens your  יום טובexperience, and thereby enhances your connection to Hashem. The  דברי תורהin this journal were produced and edited primarily by the members of the Beis Haknesses of North Woodmere – people who through their love of Hashem and dedication to His תורה, have maintained the sense of focus on Hashem despite the many professional and other responsibilities that can so easily distract from our basic life’s mission. Through their busy work days they continue to keep Hashem and His  תורהat the forefront of all that they do. They are paradigms of what we all hope to accomplish during the  ימים נוראיםseason, raising families and living lives of total dedication to Hashem. May the  רבונו של עולםallow each of us to be educated, inspired and uplifted by the words of  תורהin this journal, and to return to Hashem with enhanced appreciation for His unending kindness. I would like to express special gratitude to Moshe Buchbinder and Moshe Grushko who each invested countless hours to making this journal a reality. Their leadership and stewardship took this  תורהjournal from an idea to a vibrant reality. Their professionalism and dedication to this project despite their busy professional lives, is a testament to the type of  בני תורהand families our Shul is so fortunate to have. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 22 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Sukkos - The “Yom Rishon”: Restoring Ourselves to the True Beginning Rabbi Shay Schachter W $ e daven each and every day for so many different things. We ask that the sick should be healed, that we should have a steady income, that we should once again return to ארץ ישראל, and have the chance to re-experience the עבודה. We are thankful in  מודיםfor everything we are so fortunate to have, we ask for peace and harmony in our communities, and so much more. But the objective of some  ברכותin  שמונה עשרהmay not be as obvious, as they seem almost distant from the routine of our daily life. One such example is the  ברכהof “ – השיבה שופטנו כבראשונהReturn our judges as they were in the beginning…” Has anyone ever wondered what exactly it is that we are asking for, and what “beginning” are we referring to in this bracha? If we simply mean the judges in the times of the בית המקדש, isn’t that included in our request for a  בית המקדשitself? What is this “ ”ראשונהthat we look forward to, and how will we know when it has come? Think for a moment about a group of newly elected government officials, who spend the first few months of their term researching how to best serve and contribute to their respective communities. Promises and agreements are made, and the constituents are made to feel very optimistic. But as time moves on, the attitudes of the once supposedly caring and compassionate officials, Rabbi Shay Schachter serves as the Assistant to Rabbi Eytan Feiner at Congregation Knesseth Israel, The White Shul in Far Rockaway, and is also a member of the Bella and Harry Wexner Kollel Elyon at Yeshiva University. Rabbi Schachter, his wife Rina and two children, Yehuda and Yosef Shalom, do not have the great fortune to be active members of BKNW, but certainly consider themselves “honorary members”, due to their deep love and admiration for our incredible מרא דאתרא, and all of his very impressive accomplishments. May this special community continue to grow both in  רוחניותand גשמיות,vמחיל אל חיל.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 23 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון begin to shift. Decisions are no longer governed by the interests and needs of the community per se, but by the selfish concerns of the officials themselves. Resolutions that will further their personal and political interests are their main priority, and as a result, an entire constituency can be left out to dry. This is precisely what we ask for each and every day in our תפילות.fהשיבה  – שופטינו כבראשונהgrant us judges who have no personal interests; a legal system in its formative stages, one which caters solely to the needs of the people; one which has not yet been tainted, besmirched, and consumed with notions of self-absorption and narcissism. As we all know, the  יום טובof  סוכותis observed on the 15th day of the month of תשרי. In light of this, it is very difficult to understand the introductory words in מ:פרשת אמר כג: ...ולקחתם לכם ביום הראשון פרי עץ הדר כפות תמרים וענף עץ אבות וערבי נחל You shall take for yourselves on the first day the fruit of a citron tree, the branches of date-palms, twigs of a plaited tree, and brook willows… What could it possibly mean when we are told to take the ד’ מינים- “ביום  ”הראשון- on the first day of the month – don’t we find ourselves already midmonth by the time we encounter the  יום טובof !?סוכותv רש”יfamously cites the words of the מדרש תנחומא, that this mysterious “ ”יום הראשוןis the ראשון לחשבון  – עוונותthe first opportunity for sin after being granted forgiveness on יום כפור.1 Perhaps we can suggest an additional level of meaning to יום הראשון. After experiencing the ימים נוראים, encountering the  שכינהand being elevated by the sense of closeness to the רבונו של עולם, we find ourselves in a state of ראשית. We now have the unique opportunity to perform the  מצוותof  סוכותin a pristine and flawless fashion – in their state of ראשית, with no ulterior motives, with no other objectives other than because the  רבונו של עולםhas asked us to do them. We have the chance to perform  מצוותwith simplicity and innocence, for the sole purpose of why we were asked to do them. How often do we see people getting upset and offended that they were not asked to daven for the  עמודas much as they would have liked, or given an  עליהas often as they would expect? How often does this lead into heated arguments and unfitting behavior? Do we want the  עמודsolely to flaunt our melodious voices, or do we want to perform the  מצוותin a way that will be best for the  צבורand the  ?רבונו של עולםHow many people, deep down, feel jealous when their neighbor has a more elaborate and more expensive  מנורהthan they have? Are we only worried about our self-image, how our neighbors will look at us, or is our objective exclusively to perform the  מצוותas best as v  מדרש תנחומא פרשת אמור ס’ כב1 OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 24 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי we can, because that is what the  רבונו של עולםhas asked of us? Where are our minds when it comes to performing ?מצוות Just think back for a minute, to the first time we put on תפילין, or the first time we had the  זכותto light  שבתcandles, the first time we wore ציצית, or the first time we performed the  מצוהof  !הפרשת חלהWhere were our thoughts then, and where are our thoughts now, so many years later?! The story is told of the conversation between two Yerushalmi Yidden on ערב יום כיפור. Reb Yisroel was overheard crying to his friend Reb Baruch, “ – ”וואס וועט זיין מיט אונזערע עבירותwhat will be with our sins?! To which Reb Baruch responds, your concern Reb Yisroel, does not trouble me at all, after all  יום כיפורis coming, and we have the great opportunity to do תשובה and be forgiven from all of our עבירות. What scares me so much more said Reb Baruch, is “ – ”וואס וועט זיין מיט אונזערע מצוותwhat will be with our !?מצוות How have we performed them? To what extent have we done them for their intended purpose, as opposed to doing them for our personal vanity and arrogance?  סוכותis our יום הראשון. It is our opportunity to perform the  מצוותfor their own sake, and not for ourselves. This is our chance to serve  הקדוש ברוך הואwith no personal bias, with complete impartiality, and with only one objective in mind. The  גמרא סוכה לה ע”אtells us that the  אתרוגis a strain of fruit that is דר  – באילנו משנה לשנהa distinct feature, in which the  אתרוגcan develop throughout the various seasons of the year. Most other fruits can only grow in very particular climates, very specific conditions, and only at specific times of year. But the  אתרוגhas enduring and resilient qualities, it can weather all storms, it can flourish in all environs, and it is able to persist throughout the various seasons of the year.  כלל ישראלis compared to the אתרוג. They commit themselves to perform the מצוות, regardless of their surroundings and in spite of their personal impediments and obstacles. And there is no greater time to demonstrate this than at our collective time of ראשית, when our thoughts are committed, devoted and incredibly loyal to the בורא עולם, a time when we can focus only on what is essential and imperative, and leave all our personal anxieties, apprehensions, and motives aside. May this  יום טובgrant us a most enriching and inspiring outlook on that which we do throughout the year, and in the merit of our  יום הראשוןmindset, may we be  זוכהto that which we daven for each and every day: השיבה שופטינו  כבראשונהwith the ביאת גואל צדק במהרה בימינו אמן ואמן.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 25 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון ראש השנה $ תשרי תשע"ה • TISHREI 5775 Z 26 Y אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON The Connection Between Chodesh Elul and the Yomim Tovim in Chodesh Tishrei: Insights From the S’fas Emes Elisha Graff T $ he juxtaposition of the month of ( תשריthe first month of the year, according to 1 )ר’ אליעזרwith the month of ( אלולthe last month of the year, according to this view) can teach us one of the keys to preparing for the  ימים נוראיםand חג הסוכות, and help us carry forward throughout the year the spiritual high that we hope to achieve during these ימים טובים. While the days of  ראש השנהand  יום כיפורhave an obvious significance, the ability to achieve the most out of those days in large part depends on the level of preparation that we undertake in אלול. On the flip side, a main goal of the  תשובהprocess that reaches a fever pitch in  אלולas the  ימים נוראיםdraw near, and of the ימים נוראים and  סוכותexperience, should be to enable us to infuse the entire year with a heightened sense of spirituality. As we will see, one of the primary objectives during this period is to dedicate ourselves fully to הקדוש ברוך הוא, culminating with the coronation of  הקדוש ברוך הואon the ימים נוראים, and concluding with a private celebration between  הקדוש ברוך הואand  כלל ישראלon  שמיני עצרתand שמחת  תורהwhen we rejoice with the תורה, our most precious and spiritual gift from ‘ה. The roadmap for attaining and maintaining this sense of spirituality discussed below is culled from the  מאמריםof the 2שפת אמת, as woven together by several original thoughts of the author. 1 ראש השנה י ע”ב 2 The  שפת אמתwas written by Rabbi Yehuda Aryeh Leib Alter (1847-1905), who served as the Gerrer Rebbe from 1870 until his death in 1905. Elisha Graff is a lawyer at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP. Elisha and his wife Daniella and their children Zahava, Sabrina, Michal and Tamara have lived in North Woodmere since 2003 and were one of the founding families of BKNW.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 27 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון It’s All in the Preparation – The Goal of the Month of Elul No serious student would enter a final exam without having studied, and no trial lawyer would go into an important court hearing without hours of preparation. And so it should be with us, as we approach the ימים נוראים.  חודש אלולgrants us a month to prepare for our big day(s). It is well known that the  ראשי תיבותof the word אלול, ל-ו-ל-א, stand for “ – ”אני לדודי ודודי ליI am my beloved’s and my beloved is mine.3 During the month of אלול, we affirm our devotion to  – השםour Beloved – in the hopes and with the faith that He will affirm His devotion to the Jewish people. The  שפת אמתobserves that the letters in the word  אלולalso allude to a כתיב/ קריin the passage of מזמור  לתודהthat we recite on weekdays in פסוקי דזמרה. In that passage, we recite “הוא  – ”עשנו ולו אנחנוHe made us and we belong to Him. The word “ ”ולוis written (א )כתיב-ל, and is pronounced ( )קריas if it were written ו-ל. When written with an “”א, the phrase “ ”ולא אנחנוmeans that we are nothing. When written with a “”ו, the phrase “ ”ולו אנחנוmeans that we are His. The  שפת אמתexplains that the path to affirming our unwavering dedication to ולו“ – הקדוש ברוך הוא  ”אנחנוwith a “ – ”וis to first recognize our frailties and embody the humility necessary to declare that “ ”ולא אנחנוwith an “”א. Only after we internalize our own unimportance and place the emphasis on doing the  רצון הבוראcan we declare our subservience to and our connection with הקדוש ברוך הוא.4 With this sense of humility and of our ultimate purpose of performing the will of השם, we will be able to declare “אני לדודי,” and we hope and believe that He will reciprocate in fulfillment of “ודודי לי.” f t f The Segue to the Yomim Noraim Having focused on dedicating ourselves fully to  השםin the month of אלול, we then proceed to ראש השנה. One of the focal points of  ראש השנהis the שמונה עשרה of  מוסףwhich includes the  ברכותof מלכיות, זכרונות, and שופרות. The גמרא ראש השנה  טז ע”אtells us that the structure of the  שמונה עשרהof  מוסףfollows the following progression: (i) מלכיות – כדי שתמליכוני עליכם, (ii) ,זכרונות – שיעלה זכרוניכם לפני לטובה ובמה, (iii) בשופר. We start with מלכיות, to coronate  הקדוש ברוך הואas our King; we follow with זכרונות, praying that  הקדוש ברוך הואremembers our good deeds; and the vehicle for delivering our  תפילותto  הקדוש ברוך הואis the שופר. The theme of the coronation of  הקדוש ברוך הואis manifest throughout the  נוסח התפילהon ראש השנה, from the  ברכהof  מלכיותto the passage of מלוך על כל העולם כולו בכבודך, to the phrase  המלך הקדושthat we insert from  ראש הנהthrough יום כיפור. And on יום כיפור, we reaffirm ’הקדוש ברוך הואs coronation and dominion over us and recognize Him as our benevolent King who wills us to do  תשובהin order to provide us 3 שפת אמת, אלול תרמ”ד ד”ה לחודש, citing the  פירוש רוקחon ( שיר השיריםOhr Etzion printing). 4 ibid. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 28 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי with a complete סליחה ומחילה. Clearly, we cannot get ourselves into a mindset where we stand prepared to coronate  הקדוש ברוך הואon the  ימים נוראיםunless we’ve spent significant time preparing for this awesome period and really focusing on what it means to be “ – ”ולו אנחנוfully devoted to הקדוש ברוך הוא. The Theme Continues on Sukkos That the  ימים נוראיםare centered on our connection, devotion and subservience to  השםmay be intuitive. But the  שפת אמתsees a connection between this theme and the  יום טובof  סוכותas well. The ( שפת אמת (סוכות תרס”ג ד”ה רמזobserves that the three  ימים טוביםin  תשריare alluded to in the  פסוקthat we recite every day, three times a day, in קריאת שמע: “ואהבת את ה’ אלהיך בכל לבבך ובכל נפשך ובכל  – ”מאדךand you should love Hashem your G-d with all of you heart, all of your soul and all of your might. The  שפת אמתsuggests that  בכל לבבךalludes to ראש  השנהand the עשרת ימי תשובה, on and during which we repent and desire to subjugate our entire beings to השם, both our  יצר טובand our )בשני יצרך( יצר הרע.  ובכל נפשךalludes to יום כיפור, when we are commanded to afflict ourselves – “ועיניתם את נפשותיכם.” And  ובכל מאדךis a reference to סוכות, when we leave all our material possessions behind in our homes and show our subservience to השם by relocating to our  סוכהand basking in the  – צל השכינהthe Divine presence – that envelops us in the סוכה.5 To underscore this aspect of  סוכותas the completion of the process of fully devoting ourselves to הקדוש ברוך הוא, the  שפת אמתquotes his grandfather the חידושי הרי”מ, who interpreted the ולקחתם לכם ביום הראשון פרי עץ הדר“ – פסוק  ”כפות תמרים וענף עץ עבת וערבי נחלas follows. Our task on  סוכותis “ – ”ולקחתם לכםto take ourselves and devote our entire being to הקדוש ברוך הוא.6 The מדרש ויקרא יג: רבה לfamously says that the  אתרוגis like a person’s heart, the  לולבlike his spine, the  הדסlike his eyes and the  ערבהlike his lips. The point of the  מצוהof the  ארבע מיניםis to take them, and our body parts to which they correspond, and to give them – and ourselves – over to הקדוש ברוך הוא. Thus, the  יום טובof  סוכותmay be best viewed as a continuation of the process that begins in חודש אלול, when we declare “”אני לדודי”; “ולו אנחנו, and continues through the ימים נוראים, when we coronate הקדוש ברוך הוא. This process is completed on סוכות, when we dwell in  סוכהwith the Divine presence and take ourselves – “ – ”ולקחתם לכםand consecrate our entire being to הקדוש ברוך הוא. f f f Carrying it Forward Throughout the Year At the end of this process, we merit a private celebration with הקדוש ברוך הוא  עיין זהר פר’ אמר קג5  שפת אמת סוכות תרל”ט ד”ה בשם6  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 29 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון on 7 שמיני עצרתand שמחת תורה, when we rejoice with the most precious and spiritual gift that our Father and our King bestowed upon us – the תורה. The  שפת אמתnotes that the reason we celebrate  שמחת תורהat the beginning of the year is to reinforce the gift of the תורה, which is דברי אלהים חיים. The joy and enthusiasm that we show toward the  תורהat the beginning of the year helps ensure that we maintain our connection to the תורה, the living word of הקדוש ברוך הוא, throughout the entire year.8 By continuing to learn  תורהthroughout the year, we can maintain our connection to  הקדוש ברוך הואand continue to demonstrate that we are “ולו  ”אנחנוand “אני לדודי.” We pray that  הקדוש ברוך הואwill reciprocate with “ודודי לי,” and grant us a lifetime of  ברכהand the ability to remain connected to Him and to serve Him with all of our heart and soul. 7 See סוכה נה ע”ב, noting that over the course of the first seven days of סוכות, a total of 70 bull offerings are brought, corresponding to the 70 nations. On the eighth day, שמיני עצרת, there is one bull offering, corresponding to כלל ישראל, the singular nation. The  גמראanalogizes this to a king who asked his servants to prepare a great feast, and feasted for days. On the final day of the celebration, the king asked his closest loved ones to make a small, private party so that the king could enjoy their company alone. 8  סוכות תרל”ד ד”ה שמחת,שפת אמת. See also שבת קל ע”א, noting that any  מצוהthat is initially performed with sincere feelings of joy and enthusiasm, continues to be performed with that very same joy and enthusiasm on subsequent occasions. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 30 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Shitas Rashi on the Two Days of Rosh Hashana Eli Schiffmiller A $ unique quality of  ראש השנהis that it is observed for two days even in ארץ ישראל, despite the fact that like the other חגים, the  תורהonly mentions one day of יום טוב. The historical impetus for this practice, described by the  משנהin  ראש השנה ל ע”בand expanded upon in the גמרא, was primarily driven by the timing of ראש השנה, which by definition always occurs on ראש חודש. In the times when we would establish the beginning of the month through קידוש החדש,  בית דיןwould have to wait for the  עדיםto appear and provide testimony about the new moon before they could declare the day as the first of  תשריand hence, ראש השנה. Today, even though our calendar is fixed, there are many Halachic implications specific to the two days of ראש  השנהthat are a legacy of the original issues that arose when we were מקדש the  חודשthrough ( ראייהi.e., by testimony). By focusing on the view of רש”י, I hope to highlight a number of interesting issues related to the historical development of the two days of ראש השנה. There are at least four distinct historical eras of how the days of ראש השנה were determined.1 Like other months, before the calendar was established on a set schedule, the month of  אלולcould be either 29 days (“ )”חסרor 30 days (“ )”מעוברwith the next day considered the first of תשרי. This was determined based on when acceptable testimony as to the appearance of the new moon was provided in ירושלים. The First Tekufah During the first era,  בית דיןwould accept  עדותthe entire day. Since no one could be sure when the  עדיםwould arrive, the 30th day (relative to ראש חודש  )אלולwas treated with  –קדושת יום טוב מספקdue to uncertainty as to the status of 1 As summarized in  פרק א, חלק א, המועדים בהלכהand based on ראש השנה ל ע”ב Eli Schiffmiller is an analyst focused on insurance investments and risk management at Silver Point Capital, a hedge fund in Greenwich, CT. Eli and Esti joined BKNW in 2012, and have two children, Avigail and Aharon.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 31 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון the day it was treated as יום טוב. If the  עדיםactually did come on the 30th day,  בית דיןwould declare it the first of  תשריand there would only be one day of ראש השנה. If  עדיםdid not show up, however, the month of  אלולwould be מעובר, and there would effectively be two days of ראש השנה: the 30th day which was kept  מספקand the 31st day which is the first of תשרי.2 Outside of ירושלים, after the initial signal system was interrupted,  בית דיןwould not be able to send  שלוחיםout to inform everyone when  ראש השנהwas established until after the יום טוב. Therefore,  בית דיןwould send out  שלוחיםin  אלולso that those further away from  ירושליםwould know which days the 30th and 31st fell out on.3  תוספותexplains that both days were kept  מספקas they could not know for certain which day was actually ראש השנה. רש”י, however, indicates that only the 30th was observed as  ראש השנהwhile the 31st was חול, דרוב שנים אין אלול  –מעוברsince in most years  אלולwas only 29 days, they would only keep the 30th day. The result is surprising: Although the Jews in  ירושליםmay have kept two days of  ראש השנהif the  עדיםdid not arrive on time on the 30th day, those in  חוץ לארץwould only keep one day during this time period. This is the exact opposite of what we do today by the שלש רגלים. The Second Tekufah The second  תקופהbegan after an incident in which the  עדיםarrived late in the day one year on the 30th. The presence of  עדיםmeant that the 30th was the real day of  ראש השנהbut the  לוייםhad already sung the wrong שיר של יום, that of a weekday, as part of the תמיד של בין הערבים, instead of the special  שירfor ראש השנה.  חז”לtherefore instituted a cutoff for the ’עדיםs arrival. If they came before  מנחהtime on the 30th day, there was only one day of  ראש השנהas was the case in the first תקופה. However, if the  עדיםarrived after  מנחהor didn’t come at all, the second day is considered the real day of ( ראש השנהi.e., it is the first of )תשרי. Since we know with certainty at  מנחהof the 30th day that there will be two days, it is possible to consider the  קדושהof  ראש השנהas a  – יומא אריכתאan extended 48-hour period of a singular holiness, which is no longer  קדושה מספקas in the first era. The general implications of how we treat two consecutive days of יום טוב are discussed in the  גמראin עירובין לח ע”א, among other places. Do we consider the two consecutive non- חולdays as two separate  )”שתי קדושות“( קדושותor as a single contiguous  ?)”קדושה אחת“( קדושהThis question has bearing on a number of הלכות. For example, if we hold שתי קדושות, then one may establish two different 2 It’s possible that only the 31st day was  ראש השנהif  בית דיןknew  על פי חשבוןthat  אלולmust be 30 days. In this case, even if  עדיםwould show up on the 30th  בית דיןwould not accept their עדות. Ibid. page 32 3 ראש השנה יח ע”א OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 32 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי  עירובי תחומיםin opposite directions, one for the first day and one for the second day. If the  קדושהis considered a single entity, however, then the second  עירובwill not accomplish anything. How does this translate to ?ראש השנה The  משנהin  עירובין לט ע”אquotes a  מחלוקתbetween  ר’ יהודהand  ר’ יוסיas to whether the two days of  ראש השנהare considered  קדושה אחתor שתי קדושות in the time period after the  תקנהto not accept  עדיםafter  מנחהwas issued. In the first תקופה, as described above, the  קדושת יום טובwould most likely be that of שתי קדושות, as even when two days were kept, only one of the days was actually considered the real day of ( ראש השנהsimilar to יום טוב שני של )גליות. However, in the second תקופה, if the  עדיםdid not arrive by מנחה, the תקנה established two definite days of ראש השנה: the remainder of the 30th and the entire day of the 31st. Thus  ר’ יוסיasserts that we should consider  ראש השנהin this time period as a single יומא אריכתא. However,  ר’ יהודהresponds that the reason we have two days of  ראש השנהis only  – כי היכי דלא לזלזולי ביהin order to not disgrace it.  רש”יexplains that if the  עדיםarrived after מנחה, the 30th day should really have been  חולas the  תקנהestablished the 31st day as ראש השנה. The only reason work is forbidden on the 30th day is to prevent a situation in a subsequent year in which people will remember that they were able to do  מלאכהin the afternoon last year and will start doing work even before מנחה time. Then if it turns out that  עדיםdo show up in time, they will have done  מלאכהon the actual day of יום טוב. Thus according to ר’ יהודה, the fact that we have two definite days of  ראש השנהis not indicative of a  קדושה אחתbut rather was instituted to avoid treating the day as a יום חול. Although the  גמראin  ביצה ד ע”בconcludes that we hold of  קדושה אחתon ( ראש השנהlike )ר’ יוסי,  רש”יthere seems to quote the  גמראin  עירוביןthat the reason the first day is also sanctified is “אין מזלזלינן ביה,”4 a reference to ר’ יהודה. In order to resolve this apparent contradiction, Rabbi Michael Rosensweig points out5 that ’רש”יs view may be that  ר’ יוסיagreed that the reason the 30th is kept as  קדושafter the  תקנהis indeed so that people should not denigrate the sanctity of the first day. Nonetheless, the very fact that the  קדושהof the two days was determined through a definitive תקנה, regardless of the reasoning, means that the  קדושת ראש השנהis considered קדושה אחת. The  ריטב”אin 6 עירוביןexplains that according to ר’ יוסי, the reason חז”ל kept the first day sanctified after the  תקנהif  עדיםarrive after  מנחהis that it really should have been the  תורהday of ( ראש השנהsince it is the actual day of the )מולד. Even though  בית דיןhas the power to determine that the 31st is 4 See also שו”ת רש”י קט”ז 5 In a  שיעורentitled ‘ ’יומא אריכתאaccessible on YUTorah.org 6 See also the  שלחן ערוך הרבand לבוש, both in אורח חיים ת”ר  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 33 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון the actual day of  ראש השנהfrom a  דאורייתאperspective,  חז”לmaintained the importance of the first day by keeping it holy as well. Since the reason it is a  יומא אריכתאaccording to the  ריטב”אis due to the fundamental reason for the  תקנהthat both days have legitimate reasons to be considered קדוש, presumably ’ר’ יהודהs explanation of  כי היכי דלא לזלזולי ביהwould not be compatible with the view of ( קדושה אחתas opposed to what we explained in )רש”י. Both  רש”יin  ביצהand  עירוביןand the  ריטב”אwould ostensibly agree that if there are two days of  ראש השנהduring this time period, the second day would be the primary day of  יום טובand  יום כיפורand  סוכותwould be calculated relative to it. However,  רש”יin  מנחות ק ע”בseems to say that the first day is considered the main day of ראש השנה, not the second. The  משנהin  מנחותstates that if the two days of  ראש השנהoccur on Thursday and Friday, the לחם הפנים is eaten on the following שבת.  רש”יasks if  ראש השנהstarted on Thursday, then  יום כיפורwould fall out on  שבתwhich means the  לחם הפניםcould not be eaten until מוצאי שבת.  תוספותalready points out that ’רש”יs question is difficult to understand. If during the period of the  בית המקדשthere were two days ראש השנה, it must mean that the  עדיםdid not show up until after מנחה, in which case the primary day of ראש השנה, is the second day on Friday. Therefore, יום  כיפורwill actually fall out on the following Sunday and not שבת. Indeed, the Rogatchover Gaon7 maintains that according to  רש”יin  מנחותand the רמב”ם, the primary day of  ראש השנהis the first day even if  עדיםarrive after  מנחהand similarly, the  שופרwas only blown on the first day. The  תקנהdid not take away the primacy of the first day, but rather added on a second day so the קרבן מוסף could be brought properly.8 Further, the  גמראin ’עירוביןs statement of כי היכי  דלא לזלזולי ביהis not a reference to the first day but a reference to the second day – the only reason the second day was  קדושwas because it was the day in which they brought the קרבן מוסף, and therefore would not be considered a  יומא אריכתאaccording to ר’ יהודה. In summary, there is a three-way ( מחלוקתto the extent the Rogatchover is staking his view within that of  )ראשוניםas to what was changed during the second  תקופהwhen  עדיםarrive after מנחה. According to  רש”יin  ביצהand the ריטב”א, the primary day was now the 31st, while according to the Rogatchover in explaining  רש”יin מנחות, the primary day is still the 30th since  עדיםarrived on that day. Although both the  ריטב”אand the Rogatchover agree that there is a Halachic significance to the ( יום המולדi.e., the 30th) they argue as to whether 7 כב: הלכות יום טוב א,צפנת פענח 8 This is per the ’רמב”םs view (3:5  )קידוש החודשthat the  תקנהwas made in order to avoid issues with bringing the  קרבן מוסףafter the תמיד של בין הערבים, and not necessarily due to the לויים singing the wrong שיר של יום OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 34 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי it has importance on a  דאורייתאlevel or only מדרבנן: according to the ריטב”א the  תקנהalso made the 30th  קדושbut it is not the real day of ראש השנה, while the Rogatchover contends that it is still the real day of ראש השנה. רש”י, on the other hand, by quoting  כי היכי דלא לזלזולי ביהin  ביצהimplies that there is no real significance to the 30th other than the fact we want to avoid having people view the first day as  חולin case the  עדיםdo show up in time. In the  סוגיותin  עירוביןand ביצה, the  גמראclearly mentions that two days of  ראש השנהwere kept in גלות. Yet as mentioned earlier, during the first era,  רש”יheld that only the 30th day was kept by those outside of the reach of the שלוחים, as in most years  אלולwas only 29 days long. According to רש”י, what changed after the first  ?תקופהIn המועדים בהלכה,9 Rav Shlomo Yosef Zevin explains that at first, the only  ספקwas if the  עדיםwould reach  ירושליםon the 30th day or not. Therefore, since most years were  חסרanyway, those further away from  ירושליםonly kept the 30th day. However, after the  תקנהthat the  עדיםhad to arrive before  מנחהin order for there to be only one day of ראש השנה, there arose an additional ספק. Even if the witnesses did arrive on the 30th (as could be expected in most years), those far away from  ירושליםcould not be certain if they made it before the  מנחהcutoff. Thus in this period and on, there was no longer a majority that could help determine which day to celebrate as ראש השנה, and instead both days were observed. The Third Tekufah The third  תקופהbegan after the destruction of the  בית המקדשbut during the period in which  בית דיןwould still sanctify the new month through witnesses.  ר’ יוחנן בן זכאיruled that once again  בית דיןwould accept  עדיםthe entire 30th day since there is no longer a concern of the  לוייםsinging the wrong שיר של יום. At first blush, one would assume that the same procedure observed during the first period would be followed: if the  עדיםshow up at any point on the 30th day there is only one day  ראש השנהeven if they arrive after  מנחהtime. Indeed, the  גמראin  ביצה ה ע”אinitially states that even if you hold of  קדושה אחתduring the second תקופה, after ’ר’ יוחנן בן זכאיs declaration, we should have two separate periods of  קדושהas there is only one definite day of יום טוב. If ever there are two days of ( יום טובi.e.,  עדיםdo not show up or are not accepted on the 30th) the first day is only observed מספק, and not through a תקנה. However, the גמרא in  ביצה ה ע”בconcludes that  ר’ יוחנן בן זכאיonly changed which day is the real day of ראש השנה, but left the two days intact: מי לא מודה רבן יוחנן בן זכאי שאם באו עדים מן המנחה ולמעלה שנוהגין אותו היום קדש ולמחר קדש 9 36  חלק א דף,המועדים בהלכה  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 35 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Doesn’t R’ Yochanan Ben Zakai agree that if the witnesses arrive after mincha that we still maintain that day and the next day as holy?  רש”יexplains that by accepting  עדיםafter  מנחהon the first day, ר’ יוחנן בן  זכאיtransformed the first day into the primary day of ראש השנה. However, he did not remove the  תקנהof maintaining the second day  בקדושהif the עדים arrive after מנחה. The  מהרש”אexplains in  רש”יthat the words of the  גמראcan be understood as a reference to the original  תקנהas follows: Doesn’t  ר’ יוחנן בן זכאיagree that during the second תקופה, if  עדיםcame after  מנחהwe would have two days? Therefore, since all he changed was accepting the  עדיםafter  מנחהand did not alter the original תקנה, there are still two days that are considered קדושה אחת. This ruling seems to strengthen the institution of two days of ראש השנה. During the second תקופה, according to רש”י, the first day was maintained in sanctity כי היכי דלא לזלזולי ביה. (As we mentioned, this is even used by the גמרא in  עירוביןas a reason that the two days are really שתי קדושות.) This reasoning no longer applies in the third  תקופהas if the  עדיםcome at any point during the entire day, the 30th day is the real day of ראש השנה. If they don’t come by the end of the first day, then the 31st is ראש השנה. As there is no longer a situation in which a day will be partially  חולwe do not have to worry about זלזול. Yet the  תקנהof two days is still maintained according to  ר’ יוחנן בן זכאיeven though the overall reasoning no longer applies. The fact that  חז”לinstituted two days of  ראש השנהeven in this period perhaps supports the notion that the first and second day of  ראש השנהare not just due to a calendric peculiarity but indeed each fulfill unique aspects of the יום הדין. The Fourth and Final Tekufah The final  תקופהbegan after the present calendar was established and  עדיםwere no longer required to determine which day is  – ראש חודשthis is the period we are in now. Today, both in  ארץ ישראלand in חוץ לארץ, we observe two days of ראש השנה. Although the  גמראin  ביצהconcludes that  ראש השנהis קדושה אחת, there is still a question, however, as to how far we apply this concept. The  רמב”םin ח-ה: הלכות עירובין חseems to hold that  קדושה אחתby  ראש השנהis a real  – יומא אריכתאi.e., the  קדושהis a contiguous 48-hour period. Thus the רמב”ם rules that one cannot make two עירובי תחומים, one for  יום טוב ראשוןand one for  יום טוב שניas he can by other ימים טובים, as  ראש השנהis one long קדושה. Further, if the  עירובis no longer extant after the first day one can still rely on it on the second day, as the single 48-hour period has only one  בין השמשותat the beginning. The ראב”ד, on the other hand, argues and maintains that we only OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 36 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי use  קדושה אחתto be stringent, but not to be lenient. Therefore, if the  עירובis destroyed after the first day, one may no longer rely on it for the second day, as it requires an  עירובby its  בין השמשותas well. The  ראב”דagrees with the רמב”ם in the first case, though, since prohibiting the usage of two  עירוביםin different directions results in a חומרא. This question of how far to extend  קדושה אחתalso pertains to the ברכה of שהחיינו. In שו”ת רש”י קט”ז,  רש”יstates that in his times, they made a שהחיינו on the second day of ראש השנה. His reasoning is that the second day of ראש  השנהis the main day, since in the times of  בית דיןthey only had the first day of  – ראש השנה כי היכי דלא לזלזולי ביהso that people should not err in how they treat the first day. Therefore, as our two days of  ראש השנהin  גלותwas modeled after the initial two days of  ראש השנהestablished in ירושלים, we make the ברכה of  שהחיינוon the second day. This responsum from  רש”יis very perplexing: the second day was the more important day only during the second תקופה, but  רש”יexplicitly states in  ביצהthat after ’ר’ יוחנן בן זכאיs ruling, the first day became the primary day (and indeed, our first of  תשריis day one of )ראש השנה. To resolve this question, Rabbi Rosensweig10 suggests that unlike the רמב”ם,  רש”יheld  קדושה אחתby  ראש השנהis not really a  – יומא אריכתאone contiguous period of קדושה. Rather, it’s more akin to when  שבתand יום טוב follow each other. In this case although we may consider them קדושה אחת from a Halachic perspective, we do not look at these two days as a יומא  אריכתאas the  קדושותare clearly different. Since as discussed above ר’ יוחנן בן  זכאיmaintained the  תקנהof the second period in-force (despite switching the importance of the days)  רש”יreferences the initial  תקנהas it serves as the original model for  קדושה אחתon ראש השנה. In this time period, however, the second day was primary with the first day only in place to avoid זלזול. Thus the original model of  קדושה אחתwas one in which the  קדושותhad distinctly separate sources. So today, although the primary day of  ראש השנהis the first day, the  קדושהis not one of a real יומא אריכתא, and  שהחיינוmust be recited on the second day. 10 In a  שיעורentitled ‘ ’יומא אריכתאaccessible on YUTorah.org  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 37 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 38 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי A Hole in “Holy”? The History and Meaning Behind an Enigmatic Prayer1 Gavri Butler $ A s someone with regrettably deficient davening, I continue to guiltily strive, especially during this season of prayer, to identify methods for increasing my concentration. The challenge, of course, is that once I actually achieve proper כוונה, I realize that I have no idea what I’m saying! Therefore, I would like to study a particular passage in the  מחזורand hopefully come to a better understanding of at least one of the overarching themes of this High Holiday season. The Questions Last year I was struck by a passage in the seasonal additions to the third ברכה of the עמידה, colloquially known as “”ובכן תן. These paragraphs are added to both put special emphasis on God’s kingship and articulate our hope that the entire world (not just those of us sitting in Shul on the High Holidays) will recognize such kingship. Like other sections of our liturgy, these paragraphs are interspersed with scriptural prooftexts. For example, the fourth paragraph states:  בהר ציון משכן כבודך ובירושלים עיר.ותמלוך אתה ה’ לבדך על כל מעשיך .ה- ימלך ה’ לעולם אלהיך ציון לדר ודר הללוי. ככתוב בדברי קדשך.קדשך And you, Lord, will rule alone over those You have made, in Mount Zion, the dwelling of your glory, and in Jerusalem, Your holy city, as it is written in your holy writings: “The Lord 1 Special thanks to Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz, Rabbi Dr. Yehuda Septimus, Judge Dan Butler, Terry Novetsky, Ezra Schneck and Menachem Butler who reviewed and commented on earlier versions of this essay, as well as the editors of Or Hatzafon for their tireless dedication to spreading  תורהin North Woodmere and beyond. Gavri Butler is an attorney and a proud member of BKNW.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 39 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון shall reign forever, He is your God, Zion, from generation to generation, Halleluya.2 Like most prooftexts in our davening, the  פסוקquoted both summarizes and compliments the preceding statements. In this case, both the prayer and the  פסוקreference (1) God’s kingship, (2) Zion and (3) distinct statements of God’s place as ruler over the world in general (“”ותמלוך אתה ה’ לבדך על כל מעשיך and “ )”ימלוך ה’ לעולםand the inhabitants of Zion/Jerusalem in particular (“בהר  ”ציון משכן כבודך ובירושלים עיר קדשךand “)”אלהיך ציון. The author of the prayer makes a statement, and reinforces it with a scriptural proof easily compared to such statement. Not so the immediately succeeding paragraph: , ככתוב ויגבה ה’ צבקות במשפט.קדוש אתה ונורא שמך ואין אלוה מבלעדיך . ברוך אתה ה’ המלך הקדוש.ל הקדוש נקדש בצדקה-והא You are holy, Your name is awesome, and there is no god but You, as it is written, “The Lord of hosts shall be raised up through His judgment, the Holy God made holy in righteousness.” Blessed are You, Lord, the holy King. There are three seemingly unrelated clauses in this paragraph: (a) a statement that God is both holy and unique, (b) a scriptural reference, in this case to 5:16 ישעיה, stating that God is raised up by and through justice and (c) a seasonally modified blessing, proclaiming unequivocally that God is the Holy King.3 But most strikingly, the referenced verse from ישעיה seems completely out of place. The  פסוקassumes God’s deity, and talks about judgment and justice, neither of which are mentioned in the earlier clauses. So what is this  פסוקdoing here? This question is heightened by two additional sources. First, the primary source for changing the text of the third  ברכהof the  עמידהis the following גמרא: ל- כל השנה כולה אדם מתפלל הא:ואמר רבה בר חיננא סבא משמיה דרב  חוץ מעשרה ימים שבין ראש השנה ויום, מלך אוהב צדקה ומשפט,הקדוש  אפילו אמר: ורבי אלעזר אמר.הכפורים שמתפלל המלך הקדוש והמלך המשפט ל הקדוש נקדש- ויגבה ה’ צבקות במשפט והא: שנאמר, יצא- ל הקדוש-הא  אלו עשרה ימים שמראש השנה ועד-  אימתי ויגבה ה’ צבקות במשפט.בצדקה 2 Translation from Sacks, Chief Rabbi Lord Jonathan, The Koren Rosh Hashana Mahzor, Koren Publishers Jerusalem, 2013 3 We could potentially make a connection between clauses (a) and (c), as both address God’s primacy, though upon further review we note that (a) actually references God as deity while (c) references God as king. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 40 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי ל הקדוש- הא: מאי הוה עלה? אמר רב יוסף.ל הקדוש- וקאמר הא,יום הכפורים  והלכתא. המלך הקדוש והמלך המשפט:ומלך אוהב צדקה ומשפט; רבה אמר ) (ברכות יב ע”ב.כרבה Raba bar Hinena the elder also said in the name of Rav: Throughout the year one says in the Tefillah, ‘The holy God’, and ‘King who loves righteousness and judgment’, except during the ten days between New Year and the Day of Atonement, when he says, ‘The holy King’ and ‘The King of judgment’. R. Elazar says: Even during these days, if he said, ‘The holy God’, he has fulfilled his obligation, since it says, “But the Lord of Hosts is exalted through justice, and the holy God is sanctified through righteousness”: When is the Lord of Hosts exalted through justice? In these ten days from New Year to the Day of Atonement; and none-the-less it says, ‘the holy God’. What do we decide? — R. Joseph said: ‘The holy God’ and ‘The King who loves righteousness and judgment’; Rabbah said: ‘The holy King’ and ‘The King of judgment’. The law is like Rabbah. (Brachos 12b) Note that the  פסוקused to prove the view of  ר’ אלעזרand ר’ יוסף, the one not accepted as הלכה, that we do not switch from the standard ending of “ל הקדוש- ”האto “”המלך הקדוש, is our verse in ישעיה, which includes the phrase “ל הקדוש-”הא. Why then would this same verse be chosen to precede the nonstandard  ברכהof “?”המלך הקדוש Second, the larger context of our  פסוקin Chapter 5 of  ישעיהdiscussed God punishing the licentious hedonists who spend their time at drunken banquets rather than recognizing God. Is it really in our best interest to remind God of his vow to punish those with misplaced priorities? Why specifically invoke this verse at this point on these days? So we have three questions: 1. What is the connection between each of (a), (b) and (c)? 2. Why choose a  פסוקthat is not at all related to the ברכה, and in fact undermines the changed ?ברכה4 3. Why raise punishing the wicked through divine justice at a time when we are in fact trying to associate ourselves with the righteous? I have attempted to research these questions to the best of my (admittedly limited) abilities and have found few if any published answers 4 A few possible alternative  פסוקיםinclude ו: ישעיה מדand ג:תהלים מז  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 41 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון in classical sources.5 I did however find this question discussed among historians of Jewish prayer, which will require a bit of background on the history of the  עמידהtext. I would also like to propose an alternative thematic approach based on the thought of Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik. As in most cases, the truth almost certainly lays somewhere between, or in the combination of, the two approaches. The Historical Approaches When I daven at the Kotel I am always struck by the variety of texts in use, with usually at least five6 different versions of the  עמידהbeing recited at any given moment, often times in the same מנין. While we are all familiar with the Talmudic statement “אנשי כנסת הגדולה תקנו להם לישראל ברכות ותפלות קדושות ”והבדלות, “the Men of the Great Assembly instituted for the Jews blessings, prayer, Kiddush and Havdala”, how often do we ask what exactly they “instituted”? Our view of a unified text handed down over the last 2,000 years is starkly at odds with the facts, but questioning the veracity of the text of the siddur is far less theologically challenging than source criticism of תנ”ך or תלמוד. The traditional rabbinic research library includes numerous ancient versions of the סידור, including those of R’ Saadia Gaon, R’ Amram Gaon,  רמב”םand מחזור ויטרי, each of which contains a different version of the עמידה. And the discovery of the Cairo Geniza has presented an even more diverse and divergent spectrum of  תפילהtexts, many of which seem to have actually been in use within the last 1,000 years.7 Many of these alternative texts are substantially similar to the versions of the  עמידהdiscussed by the תלמוד ירושלמי ד: ברכות בand commonly known as נוסח ארץ ישראל.8 Focusing specifically on the text of the third ברכה, the Geniza contained at least six starkly different versions of the blessing of “ ”קדושת השםthat had seemingly been in regular daily use.9 Most notably for our purposes is the version recorded by  חז”לin the ספרי, and found numerous times in the Geniza: ) וזאת הברכה שמג,קדוש אתה ונורא שמך ואין אלוה מבלעדיך (ספרי 5 With the exception of R’ Shlomo Kluger’s notes on the Siddur of R’ Yaakov Emden. I strongly recommend review of this source, as space constraints do not permit me to fully address it. 6  ארם צובא, עדות המזרח, אר”י, ספרד,אשכנז 7 For a recent analysis of the variety of versions of the עמידה, see Zelcer, Heshey, “Shemoneh Esreh in Eretz Yisrael ca. 220-250 CE”, Hakirah 14:79-121 8 For further reading on the development of prayer in general and  נוסח ארץ ישראךin particular, see Heinemann, Joseph, Prayer in the Period of the Tanna’im and Amora’im: its Nature and Patterns, Magnes Press, Jerusalem 1984 (Hebrew) 9 See Jacobs, Irving, “Kingship and Holiness in the Third Benediction of the עמידהh and in the Yozer”, Journal of Jewish Studies 41 (1990) 62-74 OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 42 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Look familiar? Although scholars debate whether or not the  פסוקin  ישעיהis included in the daily text,10 this phrase is generally considered by historians11 and rabbis12 alike to be the standard text of this blessing in נוסח ארץ ישראל. Thus, the final paragraph of what we view as the seasonal additions to the third blessing of the  עמידהis actually one of the original versions of that blessing! This knowledge begs the question: if this text was rejected, why reinsert it for the High Holidays? One approach13 is that we are trying to accommodate both Halachic positions as to the actual blessing recited on the High Holidays. As mentioned above, the  תלמוד בבליrecords a debate as to whether to end the blessing with “ל הקדוש-”האor “ ”המלך הקדושand ends by summarily ruling that only “המלך  ”הקדושis correct. However, the  תלמוד ירושלמיis not as emphatic, and raises the possibility that reciting “ל הקדוש- ”האis also acceptable. In fact, numerous texts of the  עמידה-  נוסח ארץ ישראלwere found in the Geniza that follow this view of the 14 ירושלמיand use the ending of “ל הקדוש- ”האduring the High Holidays. Thus, our modern text simply combines two historically standard versions of the ברכה. And to answer our original question, the verse in  ישעיהis cited here precisely because it is the proof for the acceptability of “ל הקדוש-”הא to a  גמראcited above! While this view presents an admirable concept of unity and camaraderie among disparate Jewish practice during the High Holidays, it actually makes our text even more disjointed than we had previously thought. According to this approach we interrupt our soliloquy on God’s majesty and kingship to cite a text that would have been jarring to its original readers – like someone shouting “ ”!כתרduring  מוסףon  שבתat a contemporary  אשכנזיsynagogue. The implicit objection is then followed by a rebuttal, a prooftext demonstrating a preference for this alternate version over the standard. Finally, the prooftext is rejected and we conclude with “”המלך הקדוש. Not exactly a seamless progression.15 An alternative explanation is presented by historians based on a 10 See Mirsky, Aaron, “The Origin of ‘The Eighteen Benedictions’ of the Daily Prayer”, Tarbiz, 33:28-39, Wieder, Naphtali “The Form of the Third Benediction of the  עמידהon Rosh Hashshana and Yom Kippur, Tarbiz 34:43 (Hebrew), and subsequent correspondence between the authors. 11 See Wieder Id. 12 See Gigi, HaRav Baruch, “Holiness and Kingship” in Medan, HaRav Yaakov (ed.), Be’er Miriam: Rosh Hashana, Yeshivat Har Etzion/ Yedidot 2011 (Hebrew) 13 Wieder Id. 14  ברכות ז ע"א-  עיין תלמידי רבינו יונה.ו:ראש השנה ד. 15 Adherents to this approach would perhaps respond that the content and meaning of the  פסוקis secondary to its Halachic purpose.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 43 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון completely unrelated Rabbinic passage, the first comment of the מדרש רבה on קדשים:  ה) ויגבה ה’ צבקות במשפט/ישעיהו/ ב) הה”ד (שם:קדושים תהיו (ויקרא יט תניא א”ר שמעון בן יוחאי אימתי שמו של הקדוש ברוך הוא מתגדל בעולמו  (ויקרא.בשעה שעושה מדת הדין ברשעים… והדין ויגבה ה’ צבקות במשפט )א:רבה כד “You shall be holy…” this is the same concept as “The Lord of hosts shall be raised up through His judgment…” It is taught in a ברייתא, Rabbi Shimon Ben Yochai said, “When is the name of God made great in His world? In the hour in which he invokes His characteristic of judgment against the wicked…” And the “judgment” [refers to] “The Lord of hosts shall be raised up through His judgment…” (Vayikra Rabba 24:1) Professor Aaron Mirsky explains that the primary source for this מדרש is not the first clauses of the two verses but the last: “ ”כי קדוש אניrather than “ ”קדושים תהיוand “ל הקדוש נקדש בצדקה- ”והאrather than “”ויגבה ה’ צבקות במשפט. The  מדרשimplicitly asks, what period of time or event triggers “?”כי קדוש אני When God judges the wicked. The proof is from the verse in  – ישעיהwhich, as we mentioned above, is a reaction to God punishing hedonists – that when God invokes justice He is “raised up”.16 Thus, God reaches the pinnacle of holiness, and His name is made great, when justice is meted out against the wicked. Based on this interpretation, Professor Mirsky posits that our questions above can be answered by making the same connections to the text of the mysterious prayer. “ ”קדוש אתהis man’s acknowledgement that at this moment “”קדוש אני, now is the time of God’s holiness. Why now? Because the Day of Judgment is the day in which God judges evildoers. And, as the  מדרשsays, when God invokes justice against the wicked, “שמו של הקדוש ברוך הוא מתגדל  ”בעולמוthe Holy name of God is made great, hence “”נורא שמך.17 Finally, the prayer brings as a proof for this idea, via the מדרש, the verse in ישעיה. While I find Professor Mirsky’s interpretation quite compelling, it still 16 ג: ויקרא י- עיין רש”י 17 Mirsky admits that the connection between “ ”מתגדלand “ ”נוראis a little tenuous, but he brings a proof to the comparison from the  גמראin זבחים דף קטו ע"ב: ,דא”ר חייא בר אבא א”ר יוחנן , בשעה שעושה הקדוש ברוך הוא דין בקדושיו, נורא אלהים ממקדשך? אל תיקרי ממקדשך אלא ממקודשיך:מאי דכתיב מתיירא ומתעלה ומתהלל. And this is what R. Hiyya b. Abba said in R. Johanan's name: What is meant by the text, Awful is God from Your holy places [mi-mikdasheka]? Read not  ממקדשךbut [ ממקודשיךthrough Your consecrated ones]: when the Holy One, blessed be He, executes judgment on His consecrated ones, He makes Himself feared, exalted, and praised. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 44 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי does not explain the ברכה. What about the kingship of God (as opposed to the standard formulation of God as deity) that is both complimented and logically stems from this verse? The Thematic Approach I would like to present an alternative explanation based on the thought of Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik.18 According to the Rav,19 there are two distinct connotations of the word “”מלך. One approach is to view God as a cosmic king, in which the “whole relationship between God and His creation expresses royal dominion.”20 God’s kingship is an objective status, a statement of fact regardless of how we relate to Him. Alternatively, “ ”מלכותcould be a political concept, in which God’s kingship stems from the proclamation of His subjects.21 In the words of the Rav (in thematically interpreting certain verses cited in the “ ”מלכיותsection of the  מוסףof )ראש השנה, “God is a king in Israel, not over Israel.”22 Using this dichotomy, we can attempt to explain not just our text, but the entire High Holiday version of the third ברכה. The  ברכהbegins with the standard text: “”אתה קדוש ושמך קדוש וקדושים בכל יום יהללוך סלה. The Rav’s interpretation of this clause23 is that God is holy, objectively, and we cannot even begin to quantify his holiness with our finite human intellect and being. Despite this, we as “holy ones” attempt on a daily basis to approach God and praise him. God’s kingship and holiness is an objective status, unrelated to the acknowledgement of humanity. We then move on to the additions for the High Holidays, beginning with “”ובכן תן פחדך, “and so place the fear of You…” We could interpret this statement as a hope and desire that the rest of the world can grow to recognize what we Jews already know, that God is holy. As the Rav explains, “we appeal to God Himself to awaken man. The only way man can be aroused from his 18 While the Rav spoke and wrote extensively about the High Holiday prayers, I have not actually found this explanation in any of his published writings or recorded talks. The Rav was also considered one of the finest  תורהminds of the 20th century, as well as a formally trained philosopher. I am neither. Feel free to draw your own conclusions as to where to lay the blame for any errors, oversimplifications or logical inconsistencies. 19 See, for example, Soloveitchik, Rabbi Joseph B. The Emergence of Ethical Man, Toras Horav Foundation, 2005 (“Ethical Man”), 194-198 20 Ethical Man 195 21 The Rav draws a distinction between divine kingship and autocracy: “The divine kingdom is constitutionally regulated and freely accepted. The term covenant itself excludes any tyranny. The tyrant does not reach any contract with his subjects.” Ethical Man 195 22 Ethical Man, 196. Emphasis in the original. 23 See Rosh Hashana Machzor with Commentary from the Teachings of Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchick, K’hal Publishing, New York 2007 (“)”מחזור, p. 64 fn.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 45 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון complacency is if God shocks him, forcing him to realize he is on the brink of an abyss. ‘ ’פחדis unmitigated terror, an emotion that initially paralyzes the individual…However, this powerful and ultimately destructive emotion must then be transformed into a mobilizing, constructive force…[this paragraph] suggests a progression from terror to reverence – a process of spiritual maturation in the penitent…[suggesting] a cognitive understanding of God’s power, and this in turn prompts introspection.” ( מחזור64-65) According to the Rav, our hope is that, through the recognition of God’s kingship as an objective cosmic ruler, the world can begin to recognize and acknowledge God as a political ruler. Such recognition of the second aspect of God’s kingship will hopefully lead to the rest of the world acknowledging what the Jews have always known, that God is king, thereby bringing, as we begin the next paragraph, “”כבוד לעמך, “honor to Your people”. As the Rav explains, “[a]s soon as the world recognizes God’s sovereignty, the world will recognize His selection of Israel.” ( מחזור65) Such recognition will, as in the following paragraph, bring joy to the righteous. But the Rav also highlights the end of that paragraph, that  צדיקיםare happy not simply because the wicked are punished, but because the initial terror was the impetus for the rest of the wicked returning to God. This progression, from divine justice, to terror, to repentance, to joy and recognition, is also a metamorphosis from awe at God’s majesty (cosmic God) to acceptance of His will (political God). And this development culminates in God reigning not in an objective statement of holiness relative to our inadequacy, but “”ותמלוך אתה ה’ לבדך על כל מעשיך, presiding not just over the Jews but all of creation, the epitome of the political monarchy. Finally, we conclude with our primary text. Based on the Rav’s approach to this ברכה, we could propose that his final paragraph brings the enhanced third blessing full-circle by returning to a simple statement of God’s objective holiness, one that parallels our standard non-High Holiday version of the ברכה: “ ”קדוש אתהparalleling “ “ונורא שמך,” ”אתה קדושparallel to “”ושמך קדוש, and “ ”קדושים בכל יום יהללוך סלהbecause “”אין אלוה מבלעדיך. We then cite the  פסוקfrom ישעיה, not just because, as the  מדרשexplained, justice leads to the recognition of God’s greatness, but perhaps because by punishing the wicked God will call attention to the source of justice and inspire the rest of the world, so that not just Jews but all of creation recognizes God’s holy kingdom. And we therefore end with a simple but loaded blessing, that God encompasses both aspects of divine kingship, and we hope the rest of the world will soon recognize such kingship. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 46 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Closing By focusing on one seemingly misplaced  פסוקwe have hopefully come to a more fulsome understanding of an entire ברכה. And perhaps this will also provide a deeper understanding of one of the primary themes of the High Holidays, God’s kingship. As food for thought (because I have far exceeded my space constraints) it may be worthwhile to explore how our discussion above relates to the Talmudic debate24 as to whether the  פסוקיםof מלכיות should be included in the third or fourth ברכה. And may we all spend a little less time spacing out in Shul this year.  ראש השנה לב ע"א24  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 47 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 48 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Davening for Our Family Binyomin Pam $ A s the  ימים נוראיםget closer, it is a time for reflection, introspection and assessment of where one was a year ago and where one wants to be this time next year. We channel our energies into davening for forgiveness from our  עבירותand to be written and sealed into the book of life לטובה. As we consider the power of our prayers to influence the decision of the רבונו של עולם, perhaps it is worthwhile to reflect on the following questions on the topic of תפילה: • Question #1: The  גמרא ברכות לד ע”אstates that one is not permitted to make personal requests during the first and last three  ברכותof שמונה עשרה because they are there strictly to praise and express gratitude to Hashem. This begs the question, why during the  עשרת ימי תשובהdo we insert the request for life of  זכרינו לחייםand other requests along the same lines? • Question #2: The  הלכהis when one davens  שמונה עשרהthat if one did not have  כוונהby the first  ברכהthat he is not  יצאand must go back and repeat it again. Although we no longer follow this practice because we are afraid that we may not have  כוונהthe second time either, the position still remains that it is of higher importance to have  כוונהduring the first  ברכהthan the others. What is special about the first  ברכהthat earns this element of superiority? • Question #3:  תפילהis a time when we have the opportunity to have a private one-on-one meeting with the רבונו של עולם. We can ask for help or simply express gratitude. If any of us would want to have a meeting with any politically powerful or otherwise influential figure, להבדיל, it would be impossible to even obtain a meeting unless we were very close with him or closely connected to someone close to him. If we were lucky enough, we would then have to go to their inner office such as the oval office to have this conversation as it states in א:בית המלך“מגילת אסתר ד Binyomin Pam and family joined BKNW in 2007. He is the grandson of R’ Avrohom Pam זצ”ל.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 49 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון הפנימית.” When we daven, we are basically having this conversation with Hashem in His private meeting room. The question then is: What gives us the right and the chutzpah to “barge” into the private office of the רבונו  של עולםthree times a day, day after day, and expect each time to have a private audience with Him? Who is at the Door? All of these questions can be answered by understanding our special connection that we have to the רבונו של עולם. Our forefathers,  יצחק,אברהם, and  יעקבwere all extremely close to Hashem as is evident in the תורה, and this closeness is fundamentally different from any other relationship that Hashem had or has with anyone else, including משה רבינו. If someone we never met before would knock on our door and ask for help, we might be reluctant to invite them in. However if they state that they are the child or grandchild of our dearest and closest friend, we would immediately welcome them in and offer to help them in any way possible. Why? Not because of who they are but because of who they’re related to and helping them is helping your friend. So too, says Rabbi Moshe Meir Weiss, we come to the house of the  רבונו של עולםthree times a day. We knock on His door and the first thing we say is who we are related to. We name drop. “You Hashem are אלהי אברהם אלהי יצחק ואלהי יעקב. These people that You hold so dear to you, we are their children -  ”…וזוכר חסדי אבות ומביא גואל לבני בניהםOnce the  רבונו של עולםhears that, He invites us right in. That is why the first  ברכהis crucial. For without that זכות אבות, we would not even have access to ask for the other things in שמונה עשרה. Behaving Like a Family So if we are coming to the  רבונו של עולםand using familial connections to get in, then it is incumbent upon us to make sure that we behave like we are family, because the  רבונו של עולםwill look at how we regularly act toward our other brothers and sisters who are also descendants of אברהם, יצחק, and יעקב. Hashem will be concerned with how we relate to them, our extended family. If you are busy and someone asks you for צדקה, do you give kindly or do you get annoyed because you were interrupted? If a man learning in Kollel approaches you for help marrying off a child, do you question why you should help him because he made the decision to sit and learn all day, and these are “the consequences”? Do you treat other types of Jews that are different from you the same way that you treat Jews who you identify more closely to? Do you really worry about other Jews or do you merely go about your day only taking care of yourself? If you are that type of person that does OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 50 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי not exhibit warmth, caring and compassion for the welfare of your Jewish brethren, then when you daven to Hashem and use this “password” to get in, Hashem may respond: “You claim to be related to אברהם, יצחק, and  יעקבbut you don’t behave like you are related. You don’t treat my other children as if they are your own brothers and sisters.” In that instance, name dropping will not work and one cannot even get in. The א: טור אורח חיים קיבsays that only personal requests are not allowed in the first and last three  ברכותof שמונה עשרה. If one looks at the texts of זכרינו  לחייםand the other insertions, they are all said in the plural form. We are not asking for ourselves but rather for all of כלל ישראל: …זכרנו לחיים… וכתבינו וכתוב לחיים טובים כל בני בריתך…נזכר ונכתב לפניך אנחנו וכל עמך בית ישראל. Therefore, this is the most appropriate place to insert these extra “requests.” They show Hashem that we are thinking and praying for all of His children, not just ourselves. Rav Pam’s Concern for his Family I once came to the house of my grandfather, R’ Avrohom Pam  זצ”לand witnessed something quite unusual. My grandfather was sitting in his room sobbing with tears streaming down his face. Anyone who knew my grandfather knew that he never wasted time and he spent every available minute of the day learning. Yet, this time he was just sitting and sobbing. After he had collected himself, I inquired as to what was upsetting him. He responded: “What happened this morning, the signing of the Oslo Accords at the White House, was a tragedy to the Jewish people. If one learns נ”ך, one knows that this path will never lead to peace. This will only lead to more loss of life of our brothers and sisters. I don’t know if I’ll be around to see it but you certainly will. How can I not cry?” This is what it means to truly feel that all of כלל ישראל, whether religious or not, whether they live near or far, or whether they are not even born yet, is our family and any harm that may come to them even in the future, hurts us in the present. The  גמרא בבא בתרא קטז ע”אstates that if one has a sick person in their house, they should go to a ( חכםi.e.,  )תלמיד חכםand ask him to daven for the חולה. Why? One of the reasons provided is that although the  חולהmight be deserving of this suffering, the  תלמיד חכםisn’t and if the  תלמיד חכםdavens and the suffering is not alleviated, the  תלמיד חכםwill suffer as well since he is thinking and worrying about the one who is suffering. Therefore, Hashem will not allow this sick person’s suffering to continue so as not to hurt the תלמיד חכם.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 51 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון The Message of – אחדותThe Message of Family When there is  אחדותin ישראל כלל, there is a special protection afforded us personally for the simple reason that we are connected and everyone will be affected if something bad were to happen to any one of us. Recently, עם ישראל suffered a terrible blow when three of our brothers were kidnapped and murdered in cold blood. What happened subsequently though was amazing and truly a tremendous  זכותfor the boys. All of  כלל ישראלcame together like never before. Whether religious or not, to the right, left or anywhere in between, from Israel or abroad,  כלל ישראלcame together because we are one family. Many have tried before to engender a sense of  אחדותbroadly throughout כלל ישראל. However, it appears that none have ever managed to achieve in such a short period of time what was tragically accomplished by the “”קרבנות - our three boys, Naftali Frankel, Eyal Yifrach and Gilad Shaar, ה’ יקם דמם. It is also no coincidence that immediately thereafter when thousands of rockets were targeting all of ארץ ישראל, Hashem, in an undeniably miraculous way, protected “our family.” Hashem showed us this special protection only after we demonstrated that we are all brothers and sisters and that we all care about one other. In the merit of our three boys that enabled us all to connect deeply and globally to each other in a way not seen for a very long time, may we merit the ultimate salvation in the coming of משיח. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 52 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Eating of Simanim on Rosh Hashana Joseph Etra E $ very school child can tell you that we eat special foods on ראש השנה night,1 whether apple-dipped-in-honey, specific vegetables, or other family traditions. This article explores the reasons why we do so, primarily on a global level – that is, the underpinnings of the more general  מנהגrather than of those specific  סימניםor behaviors. In doing so, the history, rationales, and potential pitfalls of the customs will be explored. Origins Very similar Gemaras appear in  הוריות יב ע”אand כריתות ו ע”א. In both instances, following a discussion of why ( משיחהanointment during the coronation ceremony) of kings takes place along a ( נחלriver), there is a discussion of other behaviors done לסימנא, as a sign. In הוריות,  אבייcomments: :השתא דאמרת  כרתי וסילקא ותמרי, [לעולם] יהא רגיל למיחזי בריש שתא קרא ורוביא,סימנא מילתא היא. Similarly, in כריתות,  אבייcomments:  יהא רגיל איניש,השתא דאמרת סימנא מילתא היא  סילקא ותמרי, כרתי,למיכל ריש שתא קרא ורוביא. That is to say, some value is attributed to seeing ()למחזי, eating ( )למיכלcertain species of produce at the beginning of the year. Though the  מסורת הש”סchanges the  גירסאin  הוריותto “ ”למיכלto match ( כריתותwhile also noting that the Aruch had the  גירסאof )למחזי, many ראשונים and  אחרוניםdo not appear to believe that  אבייrequired eating the סימנים.2 The אגודה מס’ ראש השנה פ”ד, however, cites both Gemaras as saying למיכל. So too, 1 For discussions of whether the appropriate time to eat these  סימניםis the first night of ראש השנה, both nights, or the entire עשרת ימי תשובה, see  דף על הדף הוריות דף יב ע"אand מנהג ישראל תורה אורח חיים סימן תקפג. 2  מהרש”א הוריות שם (יהא,) המאירי הוריות יב ע"א (ליתן על שלחנו,)עיין ר”ן ראש השנה יב ע"ב בדפי הרי"ף (למיתי  אבודרהם סדר תפילת ראש השנה (ובתשובת הגאונים כתוב וכן מנהג כל החכמים שמקריבין,)]רגיל (למיתי) [למחזי  מחזור ויטרי,) אורחות חיים חלק א' דין סדר תפילת ראש השנה (לחזי איניש,) ומניחין ידיהן על כל אחד מהן... לפניהן )סימן שכג (למחזי, and )ספר המנהיג הל' ראש השנה עמוד שד (לנקוט איניש. Joseph Etra lives in North Woodmere with his wife Rachelle, daughter Kayla, and numerous pets, real and imagined.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 53 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון the  רוקח הל’ ראש השנה סימן ראcites the  גירסאas being ליכול. The  מנהגdeveloped to eat the סימנים. Nonetheless, the תקפג:כף החיים או”ח ו notes that, if for some reason you have the correct species but cannot eat it, you should still “see” it and perform the rest of your  ראש השנהritual.3 Rav Moshe Shternbach (רסו: )תשובות והנהגות בargues that those with the  גירסאof “ ”למחזיrequire specifically taking in one’s hand and looking with  למחזי( כוונהis not merely the literal “seeing”) since eating does not appear to be unusual and, thus, does not seem to be a סימן. As a result, he advocates changing the מנהג to allow one to be  יוצאboth the seeing and eating שיטות. To do so, he suggests, one should pick up each  סימןbefore  המוציאand make the corresponding יהי  רצוןwithout שם ומלכות, make  קידושand המוציא, and then say each  יהי רצוןwith  שם ומלכותand eat the corresponding סימן. Returning to the Gemara,  אבייmerely advocates eating (and/or seeing) these specific species. He provides neither elaboration as to the rationale for doing so, nor how the enumerated foods were selected and, thus, what else could be used for the same purpose. Unlike our later sources (and, seemingly, our )מנהג, he does not mention saying any  תפילותor explanatory text. Nichush (Omens) Before discussing the evolution from ’אבייs statement to our current מנהגים, it is necessary to address the major objection that has been raised to the inclusion of the “ ”סימנא מילתאin our  ראש השנהtraditions – ( ניחושrelying on omens).4 Why then may we eat these  סימניםon  – ראש השנהif we believe that eating them has no effect, then there is no purpose in doing so (and seemingly such conduct will run afoul of the ’רמב”םs dictate that one should avoid putting stock in silliness). But if we believe that eating these  סימניםwill have predictive or actual effects, how is it permissible to do so? The  אור זרוע הלכות ראש השנה סימן רנז,ראבי”ה ראש השנה סימן תקמז, and מרדכי  יומא רמז תרכגnote that this question dates back to Geonic times. However, in the words of the אור זרוע, the others saying similarly:5 כי הניחוש כזה טוב הוא ורובו מיסוד המקרא ואגדות. Literally,  ניחושlike this is good and primarily based on  מקראand אגדות. But what does this mean? Are these  ראשוניםarguing that our  ראש השנה סימניםare actually  ניחושbut are still permissible? Perhaps. Arguably, what we eat (and say) does not have a downside – if we eat it, we gain a 3 The  כף החייםalso notes there that one is allowed to say the  יהי רצוןeven if he does not have the  סימןavailable to him as it is a  בקשת רחמיםnot a ברכה. 4 A detailed discussion of the  איםורof  ניחושis beyond the scope of this article. See, :סנהדרין סה and : ;חולין צהSee also, טז: יא,ד:רמב”ם הלכות עבודת כוכבים יא,  רמב”ןand  ספורנוon יד:דברים יח. 5 The first half of this also appears to also be the answer of the (שיבולי הלקט (סדר ר"ה סימן רפג: וכל זה נחש לטובה היא OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 54 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי benefit; if we don’t, there are no actual direct consequences (and ' הmay still increase our merits, smite our enemies, etc.).6 While this is a reliance on signs, according to this interpretation, it is not the  אסורform of ניחוש. Looking at the latter half of the answer, however, leads to a slightly different approach. Stress is placed on the fact that this  מנהגis based in large part on  פסוקיםand  אגדותand, subsequently, a  פסוקfrom 7 נחמיהis quoted to explain eating sweet and fatty things on ראש השנה. It thus appears that any conduct established as acceptable in  תורה שבכתבor  תורה שבעל פהcannot be impermissible based on ניחוש. In light of  עזראand ’נחמיהs exhortation and the inclusion of ’אבייs seemingly unopposed statement, this  מנהגcannot be אסור. The  )באר הגולה באר השני פרק ז( מהר”לprovides a different explanation. The ו( רמב”ן: (בראשית יבwrites:  כאשר תצא הגזירה אל פעל הדמיון תהיה, כל גזירת עליונים,ודע  ולכך יעשו הנביאים מעשה בנבואתם.הגזירה מקיימת על כל פנים. In the view of the מהר”ל8 (and the  כלל קלט[ חיי אדם,)]הלכות שבת ומועדים, this teaches that once there is a  סימןin the physical world that a particular divine  גזירהwill occur, it will come to fruition. We eat these species which are סימנים לטוב, therefore, to make sure that a positive  גזירהwill come to pass. For the  סימניםto have an effect, then, ‘ הmust already intend to do what we are requesting (but might, in the absence of our actions and prior to גמר דין, change His mind). This caveat would seemingly explain why eating the designated species does not guarantee the desired result. The ( מאירי. (הוריות יבexplains that eating the  סימניםcould be  אסורbased on  ניחושif one misapprehends their purpose. In his view, the intention of the  מנהגis to utilize these items for  – דברי התעוררותto encourage  תשובהand proper conduct (תקנו לומר עליהם דברים המעוררים לתשובה...)דרך סימן לעורר בו לבבו להנהגה טובה. When performed properly, no attempt is made to predict the future or change a גזירה, merely change ourselves and, thus, it is not  ניחושat all. Abaye’s List Though ’אבייs list is quite short, many additional  סימניםhave been added by different communities. As the Gemara neither explained why these foods are eaten nor how  אבייselected them, different approaches have been utilized over the generations. Some focus on the properties of the סימנים.  ד”ה קרא( רש”י. )הוריות יבstresses 6 This appears to be the  שיטהof the ( מהרש"א. אבל...  דכל הני סימנין לטובה הן:(חידושי אגדות הוריות יב לרעה אין בהם שום הוראה דלרעה הוי אסור משום ניחוש. 7  ויאמר להם לכו אכלו משמנים ושתו ממתקים ושלחו מנות לאין נכון לו כי קדוש היום לאדנינו ואל תעצבו- י:נחמיה ח כי חדות ה' היא מעזכם 8 In the words of the מהר”ל:  כדי, לעשות לגזירה עליונה דמיון וסימן למטה,כי הדבר הזה הוא חכמה נפלאה  כמו שתמצא שעשו הנביאים, לכך ראוי לעשות סימן ודמיון, ותהי מקוימת הגזירה לטוב,שתצא לפעל הטוב.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 55 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון the roundness9 of the enumerated vegetables, דהני גדלי לעגל טפי משאר ירקות.10 In כריתות, however,  )ד”ה רוביא( רש”יprovides a different explanation, והני איכא דגדלי מהר ואיכא דמתקי, that some of the species grow quickly and others taste sweet. Similarly, the . )הוריות יב( מאיריstresses the growth habits of the plants, that they grow quickly and/or produce a lot ()מהם שגדלים מהר ומהם שגדלתם עולה הרבה. Others focus on the names of the סימנים. The  )יומא רמז תרכג( מרדכיassigns symbolism to the names mentioned by  רוביא – אבייis similar to “”רוב,  כרתיto כרת, etc. Similarly, the  אבודרהםin  תפילת ראש השנהcites a  תשובת הגאוניםthat it was customary to take a basket of produce and derive a  סימן טובfrom the name of each species. The אגודה11 ( )ראש השנה סימן כבstrongly opposes the ’מרדכיs explanation noting,  ואם רעה הוא, אם טוב הוא יהי’ כנגד ישראל,וקשה א”כ יאכל כל דבר יהפך כנגד שונאי ישראל. Seemingly, the  אגודהthinks that the ’מרדכיs  סבראdoes not explain the inclusion of these specific species. Further, the application of the names with positive linguistic significance (like  )רוביאto the Jewish people and those with negative implications from the same list (like  )כרתיto our enemies seems to be a stretch. The אגודה, himself, thus focuses on the growth habits of these plants.  )פרי צדיק דברים לראש השנה השנה( רב צדוק הכהן מלובליןalso claims to stress names: הענין הוא שהאכילות מורים לסימן טוב כפי שמותם. At first glance, however, his explanation seems to be focused elsewhere. After noting “דבראשית הבריאה היה עיקר החיים דברי תורה וכן אפילו האכילה שהוא קיום החיים היה גם כן דברי תורה,“ רב צדוק continues: “ואחר הקלקול שהיה על ידי אכילה שנעשה הערבוב טוב ורע מכל מקום כשמגיע היום טוב של ראש השנה שהוא יום הרת עולם יכולים גם כן לזכות לטעום רק מהטוב.” In other words, on ראש השנה, we are able to return to a state of being able to derive only the good – the  –תורה דבריfrom eating. Perhaps, this is why he advocates eating the  סימניםwhose names imply benefit to us.12 Another  סבראis that of the שפת אמת לראש השנה תרל”ב. He argues that the 9  רש"יprovides no explanation as to why the shape matters. Perhaps, this represents the life cycle, as at a  סעודת הבראהeaten by  אבליםupon their return from the cemetery. Another possibility is that the roundness represents the continuity of time. 10 The Kloisenberger, (דברי יציב (אורח חיים סימן רנב, notes that this fits well with our גירסא, “למח־ ”זי, as then appearance rather than taste would be important. 11 See also ( פרק ו,חמדת הימים (חלק ג, attributed to  רב בנימין הלויa  תלמידof the אריז”ל, which raises similar concerns as to the conclusions that can be drawn from the names of the סימנים: דאף דרו־  וכן בכרתי יכרתו שונא נוי אין נרמז שם שונאינו,ביא מורה על הרבוי אבל אין נרמז שם ושזכויותינו ירבו דילמא זכויות דעלמא דילמא חס ושלום בהפך. Unlike the אגודה, however, the  חמדת הימיםresolves this issue, explaining that the purpose of the  סימניםis ( דברי התעוררותlike the  )מאיריand the names of these species remind us of things for which to Daven. See, similarly,  דף נד, עמוד הדין,של”ה ראש השנה. 12 See also  חמדת הימיםciting the opinion of  מהר”ח הכהןthat we are contrasting ourselves to  אדם הראשוןwho was created on  ראש השנהand warned not to eat from the  עץ הדעתand we are saying: ראה כי אנחנו לא נאכל זולת דברים המועילים שיש בהם זכרון טוב לתקן מעשינו ולהחיות את נפשותינו לעבדך באמת OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 56 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי reason to eat the species enumerated by  אבייis that we are only allowed to hint to our worldly needs in such a way that it is a רמיזא דחכמתא לעבודת ה’ יתברך.  אבייselected foods that allow to us mention appropriate things. Similarly, R’ Dovid Dov Meisels wrote in his 1993 sefer, ויקהל דוד, משום שאין מבקשים ביום הדין אלא שגם כל עניני העולם הזה רמזים הם למלכות...על עניני עולם הזה אלא על מלכות שמים בלבד  לכך גם מבקשים על הענינים של העולם,שמים ועשויים לסייע לעבודת השיית ולקבלת עול מלכותו  ע״י סימנים אלה,הזה בדרך רמז בלבד. The Evolution of the Minhag Neither ’אבייs statement nor the ensuing  מנהגwas codified by the  רי”ף,רמב”ם, or רא”ש. Nonetheless, the custom evolved and survived, making its way into the טור, שלחן ערוך, שלחן ערוך הרב, ערוך השלחן, etc. Many different versions of the custom exist. Most commentators cite ’אבייs list, though there is some question as to the identity of some of the included species. There are numerous additions, both genres and species. Sweetness As discussed, supra, the אור זרוע, מרדכי, and  ראבי”הstress eating and drinking sweet and fatty things based on ’עזראs exhortation to the people.13 The מהרי”ל  (מנהגים) הלכות ראש השנה סימן זand  רוקח הלכות ראש השנה סימן ראeach cite various additional  פסוקיםas proof of longstanding traditions of eating sweet things on ראש השנה. Similarly, per the )ראש השנה סימן כב( אגודה, the  גאוניםate both honey and sweet apples,14 albeit seemingly not together as we do (וכתבו הגאונים )הילכך רגילין לאכול דבש ותפוחים מתוקים סימן לשנה מתוקה. Newness Both  )סימן שכג( מחזור ויטריand  )הלכות ראש השנה שד( ספר המנהיגcite a  מנהגattributed to the Jews of Provence to place new produce on the table as a סימן טוב. It is noteworthy that neither mentions eating it. ’מחזור ויטריs version, כל דבר חדש וקל וטוב לסימן טוב לכל ישראל, seems to require (and logic dictates) that the selected items also be of a quality representative of סימן טוב. 13 Rav Klonymus Kalman Epstein, the 18th century Chasidic master better known as the  מאור ושמשgave a different explanation for eating sweet things on ראש השנה:  כי המשכת,והטעם  לזה אוכלים בראש, הם ממדת גבורה-  והחמוצים, הם ממדת חסד-  ודברים מתוקים,הברכות הוא לפי ענין המאכלים )השנה דברים מתוקים ודבש (מאור ושמש בראשית פרשת תולדות 14 It is true that early sources are generally believed to utilize  תפוחto mean something other than apple – it is usually described as a citrus fruit. Such an interpretation would fit well with the ’טורs mention of  אתרוגas a סימן. However, a citrus fruit would not generally by used as a sign of sweetness so perhaps the  אגודהis using the word  תפוחas we do.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 57 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Names/Descriptions The many additional  סימניםthat have been added based on their names can be divided into two categories – those based on the name itself (’אבייs list in the ’מרדכיs view) and those based on the description (דג/איל/ כבש/)ראש. There are too many to list them all, however, some of the older מנהגים are as follows: The  מרדכיand  ראבי”הcite a custom to eat  ראש כבשso that ' הwill decree us to be ראש ולא לזנב. The אבודרהם, among others, noted that the מהר”ם  מרוטנברגused to use  ראש אילas a  זכרto אילו של יצחק. Some say that he used to dip it in honey. Similarly, the  אורחות חייםbrings down a  מנהגto eat the head and lung (“ )”ריאהof an  אילas a  זכרto the  – עקידהthe head since it is ראש אברים and the lung, שמאירה את העינים. Properties of the Food Source Surprisingly in light of the  סברותascribed to  אבייby  רש”יand the מאירי, few additional  סימניםdeveloped taking into account the growth and productivity of the food source. Most notably, the  אבודרהםmentions eating fish לפרות ולרבות  כדגיםand pomegranate ( נרבה זכיות כרמוןpresumably referring to the large number of seeds in a pomegranate). Tur, Shulchan Aruch, et al Having discussed the evolution of the מנהג, it is interesting to see how it is codified by the later ראשונים. The  )או”ח סימן תקפג( טורcites a slightly different version of ’אבייs list but continues  ומזה רבו המנהגים כ”מ ומקום לפי מנהגו-- and from that list, various customs developed, and every place should follow its own version – before concluding by listing many of the individual מנהגים referenced above. Unlike the טור, the  מחברand  רמ”אboth specify customs without recognition that there is a broader spectrum extant and acceptable.15 The  מחברbrings down ’אבייs list and ראש כבש.  רמ”אadds apple in honey, רימון, sweet things, and בשר שמן. It is also interesting to note that the ’טורs list differs significantly from those of the  מחברand רמ”א, likely based on exposure to different communities and, perhaps,  מנהגיםthat continued to evolve. The  משנה ברורהsuggests: וה”ה מה שנקרא בלשונות אחרים לשון רביה יאכל כל מדינה ומדינה כלשונה. Foods whose names imply increase in number in the vernacular of a locale should also be eaten on ראש השנה.16 This is based on a מגן אברהם citing to a Gemara on  ברכות נו ע”בwhich shows that the local language and pronunciation matter in interpreting dreams.17 As explicated by the מחצית השקל, the  מגן אברהםis expanding this concept to the  סימנים- “הרי דתלוי לפי ענין 15 The  ערוך השלחןechoes the ’טורs approach listing  מנהגיםand concluding וכל מקום לפי מנהגו 16 The ( חיי אדם (הלכות שבת ומועדים כלל קלטalso mentions use of Yiddish names implying ריבוי.  נעשה לו שינוי רע-  שינרא, נעשית לו שירה נאה-  באתרא דקרו ליה שונרא, הרואה חתול בחלום. 17 OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 58 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי לשון המקום והמדינה.” It would make sense then – as the language used by the  מגן אברהםand  משנה ברורהalso suggests – to use “linguistic significance” סימנים only in languages which are spoken in the place where you are (or at least in which you personally are fluent). Unlike the  משנה ברורהand מגן אברהם, the  ערוך השלחןexpands the use of  סימניםin one’s own language beyond “ ”ריבויto any other appropriate message. He also mentions that the custom where he lived was also to take foods whose names in the vernacular were similar to those on ’אבייs list –( קרוי”טcabbage) sounds like קרא, a fish called  כרתwhich sounds like כרתי, etc. This “soundalike” approach appears to be a חידוש, albeit arguably a logical extension of the rather loose “rules” used to add סימנים. Some English language  סימניםexist. One, attributed to Rav Heinemann, requires eating lettuce, half a raisin, and celery (“let us have a raise in salary”).18 Others, cited by Rabbi Avrohom Blumenkratz in his pamphlet The Laws of The Y’Mei Hanoraim (p. 17), include sardines19 ()סר דין, lettuce (“let us have a good year”), and ice cream (“I scream for a good year.”). What to Say As mentioned earlier,  אבייdoes not provide any guidance as to what, if anything, to say upon eating the סימנים. Many of the  ראשוניםalso do not mention saying anything (see for example  שיבולי, מחזור ויטרי, אור זרוע,ראבי”ה )הלקט. While the  מרדכיexplains the linguistic significance of ’אבייs chosen species, he does not appear to require vocalizing it (see, similarly, )ספר המנהיג. The  טורalso does not mention saying anything as part of the ritual. The ,מחבר רמ”א, and most נושאי כלים, however, include saying ’יהי רצוןs explaining why we are eating each סימן.20 Such seems to be the accepted  מנהגat this time. According to the ר”ן,  רב האי גאוןused to have a basket of the various species enumerated by  אבייbrought to him and would pick each one up say a brief explanation of the significance (ונוטל דלעת ואומר קרא יקרע גזר דיננו רוביא ) …ירבו זכיותינו. The אבודרהם, also citing this מנהג, notes that there are those who utilize  יהי רצוןform in doing so (ויש אומרה בלשון יהי רצון מלפניך ה’ אלהינו ואלהי )…אבותינו. The  אורחות חייםalso includes saying a  יהי רצוןas part of the custom. As mentioned, supra, the  מאיריworries that the  מנהגof eating  סימניםon ראש השנה, if performed without correct intentions, might be  ניחושrather than the intended דברי התעוררות. Accordingly, he stresses the importance of stating 18 See http://www.star-k.com/kashrus/kk-Starting-the-New-Year.htm 19 Seemingly, this uses the ’ערוך השלחןs “sound-alike” doctrine. 20 The (1 : )אורח חיים סימן תקפג) ערוך השלחןsuggests that whatever  סימניםwe eat – even lesser known local מנהגim and those in our own languages – should be accompanied by a :יהי רצון וכל דבר טוב אנו אומרים היהי רצון על עצמינו ואם להיפך אומרים על שונאינו.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 59 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון the lesson of each  סימןwhen you eat it, albeit seemingly not in  יהי רצוןform: וכדי שלא ליכשל בהם לעשות דרך נחש תקנו לומר עליהם דברים המעוררים לתשובה והוא שאומרים  …בקרא יקראו זכיותינוThe  הערה א, נטעי גבריאל הלכות ראש השנה פרק כטquotes from  סידור יעב”ץthat one must be  מחזיקa  סימןfor good through  דיבור פהto make a רושם. The Kloisenberger ( )דברי יציב אורח חיים סימן רנבnotes that nowadays it is possible that the  יהי רצוןthat we say is that much more important as the names and taste of produce might have changed. R’ Shlomo Kluger ( )חכמת שלמה אורח חיים תקפגargues to the contrary: אין הכונה דרך תפילה דאין מקום לתפילה בשעת אכילה רק זה הוי לבטחון ואמונה כי מראה שהוא מאמין ובוטח שכן יהיה. In his view it is the אכילה, rather than the יהי רצון, that is of primary importance. Likewise, R’ Menashe Klein (שו”ת משנה הלכות חלק יא סימן  )תעדargues that eating the  סימניםis not “לתפילה.” Rather,  – סימנא מילתאthe סימן itself has significance and effect: דע כי אכילת הסימנים אינם לתפלה אלא אדרבה עשיית  ואכילת הסימנים הוא מילתא. He concludes, however, that we should still say בקשות: אלא שהוסיפו אח”כ לומר תפילה על דרך בקשה שע”י. Conclusion From a single general, tangential statement of אביי, the  מנהגto eat  סימניםon ראש  השנהhas evolved, proliferated, and endured. Despite the divergent rationales and practices, versions of this custom are almost universally practiced on ראש השנה. Whether eating (and/or “seeing”) long established  סימניםor those newly created, hopefully this year we will all successfully fulfill the goals attributed to אביי. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 60 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Ahavas Yisroel Avi Davies E $ very year as we approach the  ימים נוראיםwe inevitably begin to reflect and ponder all of the events that have occurred to each of us personally and collectively during the past year. We ask such questions as, have we always done the right thing? What could we have done differently? How can we improve ourselves? In his  דרשהon the  שבתbefore  סליחותlast year, Rabbi Lebowitz said that most people have confided that the feeling they have when  אלולcomes is one of fear – the fear of the unknown, the fear of what lies ahead, the fear that our lives may ultimately change in some bad way, and a fear that we are all alone. The tragic events in  ארץ ישראלthat have occurred over the past three months are enough to rattle any nation and yet they have only proven to strengthen our collective resolve, our אחדות, and our אהבת ישראל. When  כלל ישראלunites at any time it’s a great thing.  הללtells us in פרקי אבות ה: בnot to be “”פורש מן הצבור- “Do not dissociate yourself from the community,” telling us that every Jew must include himself whenever possible within the community. In addition, the  תורהcommands – ““ ”ואהבת לרעך כמוךYou shall love your fellow like yourself.” (יח: )פרשת קדושים יטThe  רמב”םbrings in )ג:הלכות דעות (ו ”“ ”מצוה על כל אדם לאהוב את כל אחד ואחד מישראל כגופו שנאמר ואהבת לרעך כמוךIt is incumbent upon every person to love every single Jew like himself, as it says And love thy friend as yourself.” The 1 בעל שם טובtells us that  אהבת ישראלextends even to a person that you do not know. The most apparent fulfillment of this מצוה is seen immediately after  מעריבon the first night of ראש השנה- How excited we are to wish our good friends and complete strangers alike לשנה טובה תכתב ותחתם לאלתר לחיים טובים ולשלום. We all give this  ברכהto people we may have had differences with, or with whom we may not have spoken to all year. ג 1 ( ספר היום יום מנחם אב כדCompiled and arranged by the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, זצ”ל, in 5703 (1943) from the talks and letters of the sixth Chabad Rebbe, Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Schneersohn, זצ”ל.) Avi Davies works in real estate in Brooklyn. He and Malky, along with their children Ariella, Tamar, Dovid, and Michal, moved to North Woodmere in 2002 and were one of the founding families of the BKNW.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 61 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון  אהבת ישראלis a  מצוהthat must be felt internally. By nature a person only worries about himself. The Lubavitcher Rebbe2 explains that the path to fulfillment of the  מצוהof “ ”ואהבת לרעך כמוךis through realizing that Jews “all are of one kind having one Father.” The  נשמהof every Jew is a “’חלק ה ”ממעל, containing a sliver of the  רבונו של עולםand therefore all Jewish  נשמותare united. When a Jew makes his  נשמהprimary and his  גוףsecondary, he can truly feel and fulfill ואהבת לרעך כמוך. This of course is manifested by a person’s actions in this world (for which  הקב”הrewards us in the world to come). The 3 מגן אברהםcites the  אריז”לwho stated that before beginning שמונה עשרה one should “ ”יקבל עליו מצות עשה של ואהבת לרעך כמוך- “accept upon himself the Torah commandment of Love thy friend as thyself.”4 In addition the קיצור שו”ע writes: “..גם יקבל עליו קודם כל תפילה מצות ואהבת לרעך כמוך ויכון לאהוב את כל אחד מישראל.. “ – “..accept upon himself prior to each prayer the commandment of ‘Love thy friend as thyself ’ and have intention to love every single person in Israel.” A possible explanation for these peculiar suggestions is that our requests of the  רבונו של עולםwill be more readily answered when we acknowledge that we love His children, our brothers, and will do anything for them. In turn, as our Father, He will naturally bestow His kindness upon us.  אהבת ישראלis at the root of not only  בין אדם לחבירוbut also our relationship בין אדם למקום.5 Although each and every one of us should strive throughout the year for Jewish unity and אהבת ישראל, it is even more important for us to focus on  ואהבת לרעך כמוךduring  אלולand the ימים נוראים. Besides for the ability to improve, correct, and establish our בין אדם לחבירו, it can help us the with the same in our בין אדם למקום. If we can accomplish this, we will surely be on our way to ensure that the coming year will be special. While I was recently looking over the תפילות יום טוב, someone pointed out that at the end of  חזרת הש”ץwe say: אבינו מלכנו זכר רחמיך וכבוש כעסך וכלה דבר וחרב ורעב ושבי ומשחית ועון וגזירה רעה ושנאת חנם מעלינו ומעל כל בני בריתך.....ומגפה Our Father Our King, remember your compassion and suppress your anger, bring an end to pestilence, bloodshed, famine, captivity, destruction, iniquity, plague…and evil decree, and baseless hatred from upon us and from all members of Your covenant. 2  ליקוטי דיבורים ח”ג דף תסדin the name of the בעל שם טוב 3 מגן אברהם בשו”ע אורח חיים ס’ מו. 4 The Alter Rebbe in ’ סדור תהלת הsays “before prayer it is proper to say ”I take upon myself the positive commandment of Love thy neighbor as thyself ” 5  אז מען האט האלט דעם פאטער האט מען האלט, בנים אתם לה’ אלהיכם, אהבת ישראל איז אהבת המקום- הבעש”ט די קינדער. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 62 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי We implore  הקב”הto remember his compassion and bring an end to all calamities that have befallen or may befall us such as plague, famine, destruction. But then right at the end of this list, it lists  !שנאת חנםThis appears to be grossly misplaced. After listing these horrible curses, how odd is it to mention  שנאת חנם !?שנאת חנםis something that is propagated by  כלל ישראלin this world?! It’s not like the rest of the list which are under the rubric of “גזירה רעה.” I believe that the answer is simple. It is a powerful reminder that שנאת  חנםamong us is the root cause of all these curses. If we are able to put aside our differences and remain strong to our אהבת ישראל, to the “”חלק אלהים ממעל in each Jew which unites us all, then  הקב”הwill remember us and protect us. Last year during אלול, some of us may have felt the fear of being alone and lost, the fear that Rabbi Lebowitz alluded to in his דרשה. However, after witnessing the tremendous  אהבת ישראלduring the past few weeks, we should no longer be fearful. Rather, we should draw tremendous  חיזוקthat as a member of  כלל ישראלyou are never alone in this world. In the  זכותof properly fulfilling the  מצוהof ואהבת לרעך כמוך, we should all look forward to  חודש אלולand embrace  ראש השנהfor what it is, the greatest period of אהבת  ישראלthroughout the year.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 63 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 64 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Eating Prior to Tekiyas Shofar Elli Ganchrow F $ or many Jews, the  ראש השנהdavening is a highlight of the Jewish calendar. It also tends to be the longest davening of the year (other than )יום כיפור. The length of the davening on  ראש השנהpresents a unique paradox. On one hand,  ראש השנהis a festival in which all Jews are required to rejoice1 and eat a festive meal (and in which case it may be forbidden to fast beyond )חצות,2 while on the other hand, the length of the ראש השנה davening means that the festival meals will not begin until early-to-mid afternoon and therefore people go without food for a large portion of the day. Beside the fact that it seems contrary to the festival spirit to fast until mid-afternoon, it is difficult for many people (including the elderly and the very young) to not eat anything until so late into the day. It has therefore become customary for many ( ישיבותand some shuls) to take a break for  קידושprior to the blowing of the shofar. Yet in most shuls (including the Beis Haknesses of North Woodmere) no  קידושbreak is made and eating is not allowed until the completion of davening. What is the basis for the custom to make a  קידושbreak? Why do so many shuls reject this custom? Even if this custom is rejected, are there certain classes of individuals who are allowed to eat prior to  ?תקיעת שופרThis article will take a brief look at some of the issues surrounding this controversy. Reasons to Permit Eating A cursory review of the  תלמודand the  שלחן ערוךreveals a number of examples where the  רבנןforbade the eating of a meal prior to the performance of a מצוה. Such examples include the recitation of )שבת ט ע”ב( מנחה, the reading of the  מגילהon  פוריםnight (ד:)רמ”א תרצב, reciting  קריאת שמעand  שמונה עשרהat night ( )ברכות ד ע”בand performing  נטילת לולבon )סוכה לח ע”א( סוכות. The reason 1 א: – שלחן ערוך תקצזOne should eat, drink, and rejoice and should not fast on  ראש השנהor on שבת שובה 2 א:א ומשנה ברורה תקכט:שלחן ערוך רפח Elli Ganchrow is a counsel at Weil Gotshal & Manges. Elli and Brina, and their children Rachel, Hannah, Leah and Dov were founding members of BKNW.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 65 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון cited by  רש”יfor this prohibition on eating prior to the performance of these  מצוותis that a person may get too involved in his meal, which may lead to his forgetting to perform the applicable מצוה. However, neither the  תלמודnor the  שלחן ערוךbring down this prohibition in connection with eating prior to תקיעת שופר. This has led some  אחרוניםto defend the practice of eating prior to תקיעת שופר. One such defense is presented by Rav Shimon Sofer (a grandson of the  )חתם סופרin שו”ת התעוררות תשובה סימן רכ”ה.3 Rav Sofer explains that the concern that one may forget to blow the  שופרis not relevant because the fear that is felt by Jews on the Day of Judgment would not allow us to overlook the main  מצוהof the day. Rav Sofer also explains that, during the time of the בית  המקדשwhen the  סנהדריןwould establish the new moon based on eyewitness testimony, the  שופרwas not blown on  ראש השנהuntil the witnesses arrived and were accepted by the סנהדרין. As it was possible that the acceptance of the testimony would not occur until much later in the day,  חז”לdid not prohibit eating on  ראש השנהprior to  תקיעת שופרas this would have presented too great of a burden on the nation to not eat for so many hours. Another such defense of the  מנהגto allow a  קידושbreak is brought down by the ( ציץ אליעזרRav Eliezer Waldenberg).4 The  ציץ אליעזרexplains that, as noted above, the reason for the prohibition on eating is that we are afraid that people will overlook the  מצוהdue to the eating activity. On ראש השנה, the entire congregation would eat together during the  קידושbreak and the entire  קידושbreak is over in a short period of time. It is therefore unlikely that anyone would forget about the  מצוהof  שופרdue to such a short  קידושbreak. One final defense is presented by Rav Moshe Shternbuch (מועדים וזמנים ד: )אwho points that there is a  מצוהto rejoice on  ראש השנהand a Jew cannot rejoice on this holiday if he is not eating until mid-afternoon. He also quotes the prohibition to fast beyond  חצותon  שבתand festivals as a basis to allowing eating prior to תקיעת שופר. Reasons to Prohibit Eating Although there a number of  אחרוניםwho are lenient with respect to eating prior to תקיעת שופר, there are many who opposed the practice. Among the 3 Contrast this position with the position of his grandfather, as cited below in footnote 6. 4 As quoted in “Eating and Drinking before Hearing the Shofar” by Rabbi Moishe Dovid Lebovits in Halachically Speaking, Volume 8, Issue 6 OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 66 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי most outspoken on the issue was Rav Yosef Eliyahu Henkin5 (whose position on the issue has been continued to be advanced by his grandson, Rav Yehuda Henkin). Rabbi Howard Jachter, in his Kol Torah article “Eating Before Shofar Blowing”, provides some of the reasoning behind Rav Henkin’s strong opposition to the custom. Firstly, the ב: משנה ברורה תקצזrules that there is no prohibition to fast until  חצותon ( ראש השנהas opposed to all other festivals and )שבת. Rabbi Jachter also quotes Rav Henkin’s argument that eating is permitted before  תקיעת שופרonly for those with a special need, not for an entire Yeshiva.6 Another reason to prohibit a  קידושbreak can be expressed through the following story which is quoted by Rav Moshe Aberman, in his article “Eating Prior to Tki’at Shofar” (Issue 53 of Torah Mitzion, September 11, 2004). Rav Aberman relates that he heard a  שיעורfrom Rav Aharon Lichtenstein on this issue. “At the conclusion of the שיעור, Rav Lichenstein stated that either position could be argued effectively. Upon hearing this conclusion, Mrs. Lichtenstein commented ‘That may be true but how can a Jew eat before hearing the  שופרon  ”’?ראש השנהRabbi Jachter relates in his article that, in fact, Rav Lichtenstein does not partake in any eating prior to  תקיעת שופרat Yeshivat Har Etzion. Many other leading  גדוליםwere known to not partake in any eating prior to  תקיעת שופרincluding Rav Moshe Feinstein, the Steipler, Rav Elyashiv and Rav Yisroel Belsky.7 Leniency for Weak People Rabbi Eli Ozarowski, in his article “Eating before Tekias Shofar”8 quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (2:1  )הליכות שלמהas permitting a healthy person who is suffering from tremendous hunger to the point that his strength has weakened and he is unable to concentrate properly, to eat so that his strength will return. Rabbi Ozarowski argues that, based on this ruling, that even if 5 Rav Henkin was known to communicate his strong disapproval of the custom to other גדולים. Rabbi Avraham Reit, in his sefer תקע בשופר, relates the following story in the name of Hagoan Rav Elimelech Bluth: When Rav Moshe Feinstein  זצ”לcame to visit on ערב ראש השנה 5731, Rav Henkin implored him, ‘You are out in the world, and people respect you. Please do something to stem this breach of הלכה.’ At the time Rav Moshe listened in silent respect. Upon leaving, Rav Moshe commented to those accompanying him, ‘How can I abolish something instituted by Rav Yisrael Salanter?’ 6 Rav Henkin bases this on the  שו”ת חתם סופר יורה דעה סימן זwho permitted an epileptic to eat because doctors warned that his failure to eat for a prolonged period could cause the individual to have a seizure. It therefore seems that the ( חתם סופרand Rav Yehuda Henkin by extension) would allow eating only in cases of extraordinary need. 7 As quoted by Rav Lebovitz 8 This article can be found in the Yeshiva University Rosh Hashana To-Go, Tishrei 5771  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 67 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון a person is not yet feeling weak, if he believes that he will feel weak later during davening, that such a person can eat even when he is feeling fine. However, according to Rav Shlomo Zalman, if such a person will feel better by eating less than a  כזיתof food, then such a person should limit his eating to this small amount. Tasting (Te’ima B’Alma) Our מרא דאתרא, Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz, in his article “Eating before Tekias Shofar” raises the issue of whether eating a small amount of food would be permitted prior to תקיעת שופר. Rabbi Lebowitz quotes the ז:משנה ברורה תרנב, who rules in the context of  נטילת לולבthat a ( טעימא בעלמאa small amount of food) would be permitted prior to performing a  מצוהwhose time has already arrived. Rabbi Lebowitz points out that eating a small amount of food could be problematic for the following reason: כט: שו”ת להורות נתן אrequires the eating of a  כזיתin order to fulfill קידוש במקום סעודה. The  טעימא בעלמאleniency would only allow a person to eat up to a כביצה. Thus, Rabbi Lebowitz points out that the person making  קידושwould have the very difficult task of needing to eat more than a  כזיתto fulfill the  קידושrequirement but less than a  כביצהin order to eat more than a טעימא בעלמא. Ba’al Tokei’a As difficult as the challenge of blowing 100  תקיעותare on ראש השנה, it is even more difficult when the  בעל תוקעhasn’t eaten or had anything to drink all day. Blowing  שופרwith a dry mouth or an empty stomach can be a difficult proposition for even the most experienced בעל תוקע. It would seem that the reasons to be concerned about eating prior to ( תקיעת שופרi.e., forgetting to perform the  )מצוהwould certainly not apply in the case of the בעל תוקע. It would also seem to fit into the category of a special need that even Rav Henkin would permit. In fact, Rabbi Lebowitz permits the  בעלי תקיעהto say  קידושand to eat prior to the commencement of the תקיעת שופר.9 Women There is a Halachic dispute as to whether women are obligated to hear תקיעת שופר. On the one hand  תקיעת שופרis a time bound positive  מצוהfor which women are generally exempt (ג:)שלחן ערוך תקפט, while on the other hand it’s a  מצוהfor which women have accepted upon themselves as an obligation.10 Although most women seem to hold by the opinion that they are obligated 9 Personal conversation with Rabbi Lebowitz 10 Rav Ozarowski, in his article, quotes Rav Akiva Eiger (1  )סימןthat women have accepted the  מצוהof  שופרupon themselves OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 68 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי to hear תקיעת שופר, the יט: קיצור שלחן ערוך קכטholds that if a woman is weak and she needs to eat before  תקיעת שופרthen she may eat. Children Leaving aside the disagreement as to whether adults can eat before תקיעת שופר, Rabbi Simcha Bunim Cohen in his Sefer “Children in Halacha” states in the name of the  מועדי קודשthat children, even those of  חינוךage, may eat before the  שופרis blown. In conclusion, we have outlined the Halachic basis that  ישיבותrely on in allowing a  קידושbreak prior to תקיעת שופר. We have pointed out that certain classes of individuals (women, children, the  )בעל תוקעmay be allowed to eat. We have also pointed that there are many  אחרוניםthat objected to the practice of having a  קידושbreak, and did not partake in any eating prior to תקיעת שופר.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 69 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 70 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי The Sounding of the Shofar: Psychoacoustics and the Soul Richard Sidlow MD $ T he sounding of the  שופרon ראש השנה, not unlike נטילת ארבע מינים and  ישיבה בסוכהon  סוכותor  אכילת מצהon פסח, is in many ways the defining  מצוהfor this יום טוב. Additionally, the  שופרhas historicoculturally been used for many purposes. As elucidated in the first  פרקof Rav Amram Bouskila’s comprehensive treatment of all things relating to the  שופרin his book קול שופר, the  שופרhas been used as: an instrument of war, an instrument of announcement (for יובל, the coronation of a king, rebellion, שבת, the new month, excommunication, opening the doors of the )בית המקדש, of demonstration, for warning of an impending enemy or natural disaster, for expression of happiness, during הכנסת ספר תורה, for גרוש שדים, for allaying a drought, during תקון המת/לויית, and at the time of childbirth, especially a primiparous one that is proving difficult. Within these שופר blowing occurrences, it seems there are very varied indications- holy versus profane times, auspicious events (both positive and negative), or life/death situations. But ultimately, and most basically, why do we use the  שופרon ראש  ?השנהThe purpose of this essay is to explore שמיעת שופר/ תקיעתon ראש השנה from a most fundamental, phenomenological perspective, via exploration of two particular episodes in תנ”ך, and to use contemporary neuroscience as an aid in this task. Beginning with the epiphany at  הר סיניas recorded in  ואתחנןand יתרו, an interesting difference exists in the language used in each  פרשהto describe the same event. In יב-יא:ואתחנן ד, it reads: וידבר. וההר בער באש עד לב השמים חשך ענן וערפל,ותקרבון ותעמדון תחת ההר  קול דברים אתם שומעים ותמונה אינכם ראים זולתי קול,ה’ אליכם מתוך האש Richard Sidlow MD is the Associate Chairman of the Department of Pediatrics, Director of the Pediatric Hospitalist Group, and Director of Performance Improvement for the Department of Pediatrics at Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, New York. Richard and Eve Lowenstein-Sidlow MD, PhD, have been residents of North Woodmere since January of 2000.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 71 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון So you approached and stood at the foot of the mountain, and the mountain was burning with fire up to the heart of heaven, darkness, cloud, and thick cloud. Hashem spoke to you from the midst of the fire; you were hearing the sound of words, but you were not seeing likeness, only a sound. In יט-טז: יתרו יטit reads: ויהי ביום השלישי בהית הבקר ויהי קלת וברקים וענן כבד על ההר וקול שופר  ויוצא משה את העם לקראת האלוהים מן. ויחרד כל העם אשר במחנה,חזק מאד , והר סיני עשן כלו מפני אשר ירד עליו ה’ באש. ויתיצבו בתחתית ההר,המחנה , ויהי קול השופר הולך וחזק מאד.ויעל עשנו כעשן הכבשן ויחרד כל ההר מאד .משה ידבר והאלהים יעננו בקול On the third day when it was morning, there was thunder and lightning and a heavy cloud on the mountain, and the sound of the shofar was very powerful, and the entire people that was in the camp shuddered. Moses brought the people forth from the camp toward Ha-Elokim, and they stood at the bottom of the mountain. All of Mount Sinai was smoking because Hashem had descended upon it in the fire; its smoke ascended like the smoke of the furnace, and the entire mountain shuddered exceedingly. The sound of the shofar grew continually much stronger; Moses would speak and Elokim would respond to him with a voice. Then after (or during) the giving of the ten commandments, the פסוקים in טז-טו: יתרו כread: וכל העם ראים את הקולת ואת הלפידים ואת קול השפר ואת ההר עשן וירא העם  ןאל ידבר עמנו, ויאמרו אל משה דבר אתה עמנו ונשמעה.וינעו ויעמדו מרחק .אלהים פן נמות The entire people saw the thunder and the flames, the sound of the shofar and the smoking mountain; the people saw and trembled and stood from afar. They said to Moses, “you speak to us and we shall hear; let Elokim not speak to us lest we die”. The version in  ואתחנןdescribes Hashem “speaking from the fire”, i.e. a superimposition, but not a melding, of visual and aural phenomena that the text emphasizes are not the same - “and your eyes did not see a form/ likeness, only sound (”)קול. Additionally, the redundancy in this passage of “the sound of words ( “ )קול דבריםand “only sound ( ”)זולתי קולis noteworthy, again emphasizing the distinction between what was occurring visually and sonically. In painting the visual aspects of the event the passage dramatically OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 72 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי describes in detail the variegate visual phenomena occurring at this time“and the mountain was burning with fire up to the heart of heaven, darkness, cloud, and thick cloud.” Contrast the above with the version in יתרו- “there was thunder and lightning and a heavy cloud on the mountain, and the sound of the shofar …”; “… Mount Sinai was smoking because Hashem descended upon it in the fire and its smoke ascended like the smoke of the furnace …”; “And the sound of the shofar grew continually stronger…”; and most importantly “And all the nation saw the thunder and the flames and the sound of the shofar and the smoking mountain…” Again, visual and aural phenomena are described in this passage, the visual in various forms (lightning, heavy cloud, fire/flames, smoke of the furnace), and the aural as either thunder or the sound of a shofar, separate from each other. However, the description here in  יתרוends with a crucial difference. פסוק  ט”וmelds the visual with the aural, i.e. “And all the nation saw the thunder and the flames and the sound of the shofar and the smoking mountain.” Professor Nahum Sarna in his commentary to 1 שמותexplains this passage in the following way: “The root “”ה-א-“ רto see”, is extended to encompass sound, thus creating a “sense paradox.” The figurative language indicates the profound awareness among the assembled throng of the overpowering majesty and mystery of G-d’s self-manifestation. It is an experience that cannot be adequately described by the ordinary language of the senses. The encounter with the Holy universally inspires fascination; inevitably and characteristically it also arouses feelings of awe, even terror. Fear of death is a frequent reaction.” According to Sarna, the experience of the epiphany may not only have been one of a multivariate and overlapping sensory experience, hence the depiction of multiple, individualized “views” of the same event, but one that was even more dramatic, that is, one of sensory melding as depicted most starkly in טו:יתרו כ. The experience of sensory modalities being cross-processed by the brain is one attested to in the medical literature, likened by some as a seizure-like phenomena called “synesthesis”. Visual input being experienced as sound, olfactory input being experienced as sight, numbers being processed as colors- all of these and many more pairs have been described and studied. The explanation given for this by one of the preeminent neuroscientists of our time, Rodolfo Llinas MD, PhD, involves crossed circuitry at the level of the sensory switching station of the brain, the thalamus. If a crossed thalamic pathway is 1 JTS Torah Commentary טז-טו:פרשת שמות כ  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 73 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון static, one experiences synesthesis all the time, which is rare. But, theoretically, in an extreme situation, when the nature of the sensory input experienced is both qualitatively and quantitatively at the limit of what a particular human can process with fidelity, a person without a fixed “wiring problem” could have sensory signals jump across neurons devoted to a particular sense and be sensed synesthetically. The epiphany at  הר סיניfits this description seamlessly. While many  פשטניםand others explain טו: יתרו כas a well attested example of linguistic flourish (e.g. my heart saw, in my mind’s eye), the  אבן עזראtakes this approach in his “ ”קצרcommentary and then seems to give a nod to the possibility of a more synesthetic approach in his “ ”ארוךcommentary to שמות טו: כ- “ ”כי כל הרגשות מתחברות אל מקום אחד, “because all feelings/sensations join in one place”. (see his  ארוךcommentary on כא: שמות הfor another example). The  )שם( תורה תמימהmirrors the  אבן עזראin this when commenting on one of the many  מדרשיםin the  מכילתאon this passage. The quoted  מדרשstates on the words “… ומנין שלא היה בהן אלמים שנאמר,וכל העם ראים…” – “מגיד שלא היה בהן סומין נעשה...ז) ויאמרו: שנאמר (משפטים כד, ומנין שלא היו בהן חרשין,ח) ויענו כל העם:(יתרו יט ונשמע.” “…And the entire nation saw… this is to say that there were no blind people, and from where do we know that there were no mutes? As it says “..and the entire nation answered”, and from where do we know there were no deaf people?, as it says “..we will do and we will listen.” As an explanation for this homily he states the well demonstrated occurrences in  תנ”ךof sensory modalities linguistically being switched, but ends with the tantalizing clause – ““ – ”וטעם הדבר הוא על פי מה שכתב הטבעיים שיש חוש משוחף לכל החושים..and the reason is according to what the scientists wrote that there is [such a thing as] perception that is connected to all other perceptions”. Additionally, Rav Epstein cites the midrashic dispute as to whether these transformations experienced at  מתן תורהwere permanent, or whether they reversed during the חטא העגל, a euphemism for סילוק השכינה. Rav Epstein is at least obliquely implying in his commentary the possibility of, at least on a temporary basis, a synesthetic experience having occurred in the context of the epiphany. Rav Menachem Kasher compiles in  תורה שלימה ח”ד פרשת יתרו ס’ תלאno less than twelve  מדרשיםon טו:יתרו כ. The authors of many of these  מדרשיםuse the juxtaposition of the word “ ”קולand ’הקב”הs manipulation of the natural world and/or the giving of the Torah throughout  תהליםas the connection to our passage in שמות. A selection of these read as follows:  רואין דבר של אש יוצא מפי,רבי עקיבא אומר רואין ושומעין הנראה..][תלא )הגבורה ונכתב על הלוחות שנאמר קול אדנ’ להבות אש (מכילתא Rabbi Akiva said- they saw and heard the visible, they saw OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 74 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי words of fire go out from the mouth of Hashem and write on the Tablets, as it says “the voice of Hashem is burning fire.  וישראל, הוא נראה וקולו לא נראה,[תלב] רבי יהודה אומר מדבר אדם עם חבירו שמעו קולו של הקב”ה ורואה את הקול יוצא מפי הגבורה וברקים ורעמים ) (פרקי דרבי אליעזר מא.שנאמר וכל העם רואים את הקולות ואת הלפידים Rabbi Yehuda says-when one speaks with his friend, he is visible but his voice is not visible, but Yisroel heard the voice of Hashem and saw the voice go out from The Gevurah, and thunder and Re’emim, as it says “and the entire nation saw the thunder and the flames , וכמה קולות היו וכמה לפידים היו.[תלט] קול קולי קולות ולפיד לפידי לפידים ) (מכילתא.אלא שהיו משמיעים את האדם לפי כחו שנאמר קול ה’ בכח …how many noises/voices were there, and how many flames/ torches were there? Rather it would be heard by a person according to his strength, as it says “the voice of Hashem with power  א”ר יוחנן כשהיה יוצא הקול לא היה,את הקול לא נאמר אלא את הקולות..][תמ  מכאן, לפי מה שהיה יכול לסבול,יוצא אצל ישראל אלא לפי כחו של כל אחד ואחד 2 ) (פסיקתא חדתא... בכח של כל אחד ואחד,הוא אומר קול ה’ בכח …The sound it does not say, rather the sounds. R’ Yochanan says when the voice/sound [of Hashem] went forth, it went forth toward Israel according to the strength of each and every individual, according to what they could tolerate, from here it says ‘the voice of Hashem with power’, [according to] the power/strength of every individual… Rav Kasher adds to this latter  מדרשin his notes from another version  כקול-מלמד שהקול היה מתחלף לכמה מיני מדות-וכל העם רואים את הקולות  כקול מים רבים שנאמר כקול מים רבים,להבות אש שנאמר קול ה’ חוצב להבות אש  ה’ אלהים דבר מי לא ינבא,כקול שד’ (יחזקאלא) כקול שאגת אריה שאג מי לא ירא …to teach that the thunder/sound changed into many types – like the sound of shafts of fire, as it says ‘the voice of Hashem cleaves like shafts of fire’, like the sound of mighty waters, as it says ‘the voice of Hashem is like the sound of mighty waters like the sound of the Almighty’, like the sound of a lion’s roar, as it says ‘A lion has roared, who will not fear? The Lord ד: ועיין פסיקתא דרב כהנא סוף פרק יב על שמות כ2  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 75 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Elokim has spoken, who will not prophesy? שמות רבה, chapters 5 through 9, has many examples of the above, with one in particular of note:  אמר רבי יוחנן. הקול אין כתיב כאן אלא הקולות-וכל העם ראים את הקולות …היה הקול יוצא ונחלק לשבעים קולות And the entire nation saw the sounds’, the sound is not written rather the sounds. Says Rabbi Yochanan- the sound emerged and divided into seventy sounds… Several points derive from the midrashic treatment of our passage of focus: First, the voice of Hashem is understood and sensed in many ways, likened to many sounds. Second, the sounds heard at the epiphany at הר סיני were “personalized” based on individual ability to understand/withstand the experience. Third, that the sounds of the epiphany, the thunder and the שופר among others, were intermingled and perceived as such.3 Psychoacoustically speaking, the ability to hear different things within a particular sound is quite normal. All sounds, other than those emanating from a sine wave generator which are “pure” tones, are a combination of numerous sine waves vibrating at various amplitudes, wavelengths, frequencies, phase relationships, and envelopes. In addition, each of these tones naturally have other tones (overtones) which derive from it and add to any sound’s complexity, in addition to other characteristics that ensue depending on the medium through which it is propagating. Fourier transformation is the mathematical technique of taking wave functions and expressing them as the combination of many simple sine waves-our brain naturally does this to some extent, parsing out a portion of a complex sound to focus on based on its presentation, interest, or the acoustic characteristics of the location in which we may be perceiving the sound (think of orchestra versus balcony seats in a theater). Switching focus to another epiphanic episode in תנ”ך, after אליהו הנביא hid from איזבל, the  נביאreads as follows: ויאמר צא ועמדת בהר לפני ה’והנה ה’ עבר ורוח גדולה וחזק מפרק הרים ומשבר  ואחר הרעש אש לא.’ואחר הרוח רעש לא ברעש ה,’סלעים לפני ה’ לא ברוח ה  ויהי כשמע אליהו וילט פניו באדרתו ויצא. ואחר האש קול דממה דקה,’באש ה )יג-יא:יט: (מלכים א. והנה אליו קול ויאמר מה לך פה אליהו,ויעמד פתח המערה And He then said, “go out (of the cave) and stand on the mountain before Hashem’. And behold, Hashem was passing, טו: כ,יט:שמות יט- עמוס חכם בדעת מקרא, בחומש מוסד הרב קוק3 OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 76 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי and a great, powerful wind, smashing mountains and breaking rocks, went before Hashem. “Hashem is not in the wind”. After the wind came an earthquake, “Hashem is not in the earthquake”. After the earthquake came a fire, “Hashem is not in the fire”. After the fire came a still thin sound. It happened that when Elijah heard, he wrapped his face in a mantle, and he went out and stood by the cave’s entrance; and behold, a voice spoke unto him and said “why are you here Elijah? (Melachim I 19:11-13) This personal epiphany of  אליהוthat occurred at הר סיני, born out of disappointment in the state of  כלל ישראלand his own performance as its prophet, is depicted again as a multi-sensate experience involving touch, sound, and sight, each sense being separated explicitly. What is most interesting is the fact that within the “”קול דממה דקה, Hashem chose to reveal Himself this time, explicitly excluding the other senses ( רוחand  )אשand rejecting  רעשas the other aural experience listed in this scene. Could this be because the epiphany here is individual as opposed to national, hence less need for such dramatic pyrotechnics? What is clear is that  מפרשיםon this clause felt strongly that unlike the epiphany in  ואתחנןand יתרו, where the ten commandments (or at least the first two according to some, and the creation of the  )לוחותuttered by Hashem were heard amongst many sounds, including thunder and the שופר, ’אליהוs sonic experience of the singular, thin, “silent” sound was the sound of הקב”ה Himself.4 The duality of sounds accompanying these two epiphanies was no doubt the inspiration of the composer of the prayer  ונתנה תוקףpreceding the קדושה of  מוסףon ראש השנה. Arguably the pinnacle of the  ראש השנהliturgy, the text of this prayer unflinchingly reveals bare our tenuous existential state, and what accompanies this process? “ וקול דממה דקה ישמע,”ובשופר גדול יתקע, unqualified, unadulterated. It is to be understood by this usage that our poise on the יום  הדיןat this moment in the liturgy should be one of encountering Hashem as if we were both at  הר סיניreceiving the תורה, with the sound of the shofar as the only accompaniment that can be replicated today, and as אליהו הנביא, with the thin silent sound that accompanies utter despondency with our individual and collective existential state- both at the same time, heard as many sounds in one, perceived as individuals within a collective. The blowing and listening to the  שופרon ראש השנה, in light of the above,  רלבג שם, מצודת דוד4  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 77 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון can now be understood more precisely. The sound of the שופר, being the only remnant we have of the actual sensory experience of the epiphany at הר סיני, perforce cannot be adulterated in any way, hence the emphasis halachically on the nature of the  שופרand the context in which it is blown on ראש השנה.5 And given the complex nature of the sound of the  שופרitself, it is easy to understand how within its various tones, overtones, and timbres, many things can be heard, and how the greater historico- cultural utility of the  שופרcould be manifold indeed. ח-ה:ז’ והרמב”ם הלכות שופר א-ו,ג-ב: עיין משניות ר”ה ג5 OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 78 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Rosh Hashana: A day of fear or a day of joy? Ethan Baraff $ R osh Hashana begins the ימים נראים, the holiest days of the year. On this day, which we also refer to as יום הדין, we focus apprehensively on the seriousness of the day as  הקב”הsits in judgment. However, it is still a  יום טובwith a lingering sense of happiness as we begin the year anew. These two attitudes can be confusing and are discussed amongst חז”ל, as they wonder: What is the proper attitude on  ?ראש השנהIs it a time of fear and trepidation or a time of celebration and happiness? The  גמראquotes רבי אבהו describing the discussion between the heavenly angels and הקב”ה:  רבש”ע מפני מה אין ישראל אומרים שירה- אמרו מלאכי השרת לפני הקב”ה לפניך בר”ה וביום הכיפורים? אמר להם אפשר מלך יושב על כסא הדין וספרי )חיים וספרי מתים פתוחין לפניו וישראל אומרים שירה? (ראש השנה לב ע”ב The heavenly angels said before הקב”ה: Master of the universe, why doesn’t Israel sing before You [Your praises – Hallel] on Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur? He responded: Is it possible for the King to be sitting in judgment with the books of life and death open before Him and they sing chants of praise?! (Rosh Hashana 32b) This is understood to mean that it is seemingly incongruous to portray happiness and sing songs of praise due to the seriousness of the day of ראש השנה as we sit in fear pondering what will be with our personal judgment. However, there is an opposing view, as mentioned by the טור: מנהגו של עולם אדם שיש לו דין לובש שחור ומתעטף שחורים ומגדל זקנו ואין אבל ישראל אינם כן לובשים לבנים...חותך צפרניו לפי שאינו יודע איך יצא דינו ומתעטפים לבנים ומגלחין זקנם ומחתכין צפרניהם ואוכלים ושותים ושמחים בראש )ד:השנה לפי שיודעין שהקב”ה יעשה להם נס (טור אורח חיים תקפא The practice of the world is that any person who is subject to Ethan Baraff is currently a 2nd year medical student. Ethan and Miriam, and their children, Azi and Akiva, moved to North Woodmere in November 2012 after living in Far Rockaway, NY for six years.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 79 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון judgment dresses in black, grows his beard, and does not cut his nails as he does not know how the judgment will be rendered. But the Jewish people do not do this [on Rosh Hashanah]. They dress in white, cut their hair, cut their nails… On Rosh Hashanah we eat, drink and are happy because we are certain that He will perform for us a miracle (and forgive us).” (Tur O”C 581:4) There have been a number of attempts made to understand this inconsistency within our feelings over ראש השנה. Rav Shimshon Pincus1 quotes R’ Yitzchak Zev Soloveitchik who explains this conflict based on a poem written by Solomon Ibn Gabirol. The poem, stated as if talking to הקב”ה, reads in part:  תפתח את ספר הזכרונות ותגלה שם את עוונותי להיכן אוכל, הקב”ה,אם אתה !להימלט? אליך If You, Hashem, open the book of remembrance and my sins are revealed, where can I run? I will run to You! R’ Yitzchak Zev Soloveitchik explains that on  יום הדיןwe have an awesome sense of fear and we have nowhere to turn, save our only practical and sound option which is directly to ‘ה, as we know ‘ הwill forgive and save us. Consequently, this confidence in knowing that  הקב”הwill save us creates a certain level of joy and comfort. Therefore, the two feelings are not conflicting and incongruent; rather they are in tandem and as a result of each other. However, because of this special relationship, someone who does not have fear of sin and judgment will never gain that absolute feeling of security and comfort. If there is no fear there is no joy. Rav Pincus further elaborates with a משל. A father and son are walking in a crowded area. Suddenly, the boy is missing. The father panics and frantically searches for his son. The longer they are away from each other the more painful the fear. Until, finally he sees his son again and they run into each other’s arms. The first embrace after the fear is extremely powerful and remarkably emotional. The fear turned into complete joy and delight. This feeling of utter pleasure only came about through the initial intense fear and it made the experience all the more powerful. Likewise, on  ראש השנהwe are standing before the  רבונו של עולםwith sheer terror of what may befall us this upcoming year. However, our realization that we actually have the ability to turn to  הקב”הto comfort and help us transforms the trepidation into a passionate joy and love for ‘ה. דף שעב, וזאת הברכה, תפארת שמשון1 OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 80 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי This apparent emotional conflict on  ראש השנהis discussed in שיחות בעבודת ’ה2 which focuses the attention on the  תפילותof ראש השנה. During our שמונה  עשרהwe say:  ויאמר כל אשר נשמה באפו ה’ אלהי ישראל מלך... וידע כל פעול שאתה פעלתו ומלכותו בכל משלה Let everything that has been made, know that You are its Maker… and let everything with a life’s breath in its nostrils proclaim: “Hashem the God of Israel, is King, and His kingship rules over everything. We have two notions of ’הקב”הs leadership in this one sentence. We mention the term  מלךin reference to being the King of Israel (מלך ישראל אלהי ’ ;)הwhile the term מושל, ruler, is used for all other nations ()ומלכותו בכל משלה. A similar comparison is made in כט:תהילים כב:  כי לה’ המלוכה ומושל בגוים- For the Kingship (over Israel) is Hashem’s, and He rules over the other nations. The terms of  מושלand  מלךare defined differently.3 The term  מלךis understood to be the title given to a leader appointed by the will of his people. In contrast,  מושלis described as a dictator, a leader not established via the will of the people. Therefore, when referring to ‘ הas the leader of the Jewish people, we describe Him as our מלך, as we have certainly appointed Him and desire His Kingship. However, the other nations refer to Hashem as מושל, as they have rejected His leadership, His Kingship. This connection with our  מלךis a true relationship between ‘ הand the Jewish nation. For a king without a nation is not considered a king. Likewise, a nation without a king is as if it is missing its head, the most fundamental part of the body. A nation missing this entity can in no way be considered a nation. This comparison to the human body can be explained further: The body parts all know that the brain/head is the leader of the pack, the king of the bodily parts. The head gives orders to the other parts throughout one’s life. The head orders the hands to lift an item, the legs to walk a distance. The head instructs the mouth to speak, the eyes to stare, and so on and so forth. However, if one day the other organs and extremities become fed up with the head and decide to revolt against it, we would find a devastating outcome. An attempt by the hand to lead the attack by saying to the others “Who made the head the king over us? If I cut it off, we will all be happy and live our own lives,” will obviously be a fruitless act. Once the head is disconnected, the rest of the body will no longer have the opportunity to exist. Similarly, in regards to a  מלךand His nation, the nation needs the  מלךto function nationally. As  ר’ מייזלשquotes the  בעל שם טובsaying,  ר’ יעקב יצחק אלעזר מייזלש מירושלים שיחה כד אות ד2  סוד ישרים אות נ”ו3  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 81 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון we need our  מלךas He unifies us, protects us and provides for us. Therefore, the connection with our מלך, in essence gives us the ability to live, the opportunity to be free, and we therefore rejoice with that knowledge as we say every שבת: ישמחו  – במלכותךwe rejoice in your kingship. However, this is not the case by a  מושלas the relationship between the  מושלand the people is not one of love or dedication like that of a מלך. He is solely concerned that they follow his demands and he is not necessarily occupied in benefitting the people. They are therefore being ruled against their will. A similar language was used after Yosef described his dreams to his brothers and they responded: “”המלך תמלך עלינו אם משול תמשל בנו, Shall you be the King over us? Or shall you reign over us? (ח:)בראשית לז. In essence they were saying you may have intentions to be the  מלךover us; however, this is not with our approval and is considered משלה. Therefore, a King-Nation relationship of true devotion and deep love is exclusive to the Jewish people as we are unique in ’הקב”הs eyes and have chosen Him as our King. On the other hand, the foreign nations lack that loving relationship and are left to fall under His משלה. Furthermore, this deep connection between the Jewish people and הקב”ה is described by  ר’ מייזלשquoting the  ליקוטי תורהin explanation of ה-ד:תהילים פא כי חק לישראל הוא משפט לאלהי ישראל... – תקעו בחדש שופרSound the shofar on the new moon…for it is a statute for Israel, the judgment of the G-d of Jacob . The judgement that ‘ הmakes on each of the  נשמות ישראלin some way  כביכולrelates to ‘ הHimself, as every  נשמהis a ’חלק ה. This is understood as a true unity with Hashem. Therefore, the חק לישראל-the day of judgment for the  בני ישראלis in essence also a  משפט לאלהי יעקבdue to our deep connection with Him. This clarifies the confusing status of fear and celebration on this holy day. There certainly should be some level of fear throughout  ראש השנהas the book of life and the book of death are open before Him. However, the depth of our two-way loving relationship with  הקב”הbrings about a true sense of joy and happiness. It reminds us that He is always with us and constantly provides for us. This can be further illuminated with a משל. There was once a town which had the tradition of appointing a new king every year. On the day the new king would be appointed there was a sense of fear and trepidation throughout the town as they wondered who the new king would be. The people speculated the changes the king would bring. What new rules will he implement? Will he be cruel to the people? Will he persecute us and make us suffer? Similarly, the son of the new king wondered what the change would bring to his new life. He has a certain level of fear of acting out of line with his father and subsequently OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 82 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי receive punishment for disrespecting the new king. Nonetheless, the level of excitement and happiness due to his proximity to the throne is unrivaled and outshines his fear. His father is the ruler over the entire town and he feels proud and confident in that connection. This is comparable to our mentality over ראש השנה. There is certainly fear; however, the fact that our Father is the King, our אבינו מלכנו, simultaneously gives us an incredible level of joy. As we approach this powerful time of the year may we take the fear of  יום הדיןand use it to further enhance our loving connection to the מלך מלכי המלכים. May we all be  זוכהto see much joy and happiness in the coming year in the comfort of ‘ה.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 83 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 84 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Malchios - Yearning to be in the Presence of The King Moshe Grushko W $ e know the main  עבודהof  ראש השנהis  מלכיות- to coronate our King, The King. In light of the recent tragic events that have befallen כלל ישראל, starting with the kidnapping and murder of the three boys, the subsequent Gaza mission with the loss of four civilians and sixty-four soldiers to date (there should not be a single more), and with the ימים נוראים quickly approaching, I contemplated what exactly our thoughts, our attitude, and our relationship with  הקדוש ברוך הואshould be at this time. Anger, fear, frustration may have been my initial feelings, but I don’t believe they would be ideal when pleading with  הקב”הon ראש השנה. Azai Melech Shemo Nikra The  גמראin  ראש השנה כז ע”בstates: אמר ר’ שמואל בר יצחק כמאן מצלינן האידנא זה היום תחילת מעשיך זכרון ליום . כמאן כר”א דאמר בתשרי נברא העולם,ראשון In accordance with whose view do we recite nowadays ‘This is the anniversary day of the start of Your handiwork, a remembrance of the first day? According to R’ Eliezer, who says the world was created in Tishrei. According to this opinion, creation began on the 25th of אלול, and culminated in the creation of  אדם הראשוןon the 1st of תשרי. “ ”זה היוםreferring to ראש השנה, the day of the creation of Man, is considered the “”תחילת מעשיך. However, we know that there were many things, many beings, created prior to Man being created on the 6th day. Then why is it referred to as “?”תחילת מעשיך Because  מלכות שמיםwas established with the creation of אדם הראשון. In fact, a little further in the  גמרא לא ע”אit says “ה’ מלך גאות לבש- ”בששי מה היו אומרים, “On Moshe Grushko is a Cardiac Electrophysiologist at the Montefiore-Einstein Heart Center in the Bronx. Moshe and Judith, and their children Tzvi, Atara, Shayna, Ariella, and Meira, have been members of the BKNW family for 4 years.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 85 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון the sixth day what did they (the Levites) say? Hashem reigns. He is robed in majesty.” The 1 אור גדליהוexplains that despite the fact that there were objects and creatures created before אדם, the ” שם “מלךwas only relevant with the creation of man, because man is unique in that he has בחירה, the ability להמליך הקב”ה על עצמו, and to negate his own will and desires to coronate and bring himself into the kingdom of ’ה. The  עיקר תכלית הבריאהis the revelation of God’s kingship in this world. חז”ל, in גמרא ר”ה דף ע”ב, state that ’ הwants that on  ראש השנהwe should “”אמרו לפני מלכיות כדי שתמליכוני עליכם, “..say before me Malchios in order that I shall be king/ruler over you.”2 In fact, the  ברכהof  קדושת היוםis said in סדר מלכיות itself highlighting its central role in the יום טוב. However, despite hearing this idea, seeing it in the גמרא, reading it ( )מלכיותwith some understanding for close to the last 20 years, ultimately they are still just words of  תפילהthat all too often are not really felt or said בהרגשה. And I think that a possible reason is because I was not fully understanding the phrase of חז”ל- the key to אמרו  לפני מלכיותis not only do we need to do the the “”אמרו, but a key factor is the “לפני.” Speaking to myself but assuming there are others who feel this way, we all too often find ourselves “speaking” to the  רבש”עbut not really “being” with or “before” Him.3 Yes, it still sounds like we are ’ ממליך הwith our words, but do we feel that we are there speaking right before Him, right to Him, the  ?מלך מלכי המלכיםDo we feel that He feels that we really want Him to be our King, that we want to have a life relationship with Him, in which we dedicate ourselves to His service? Do we think He feels we are bringing ourselves to the coronation? I believe that the ultimate reason behind us not feeling “ ”לפניis because we don’t feel we can be לפני. In this world of הסתר פנים, where His  מלכותmay not seem evident, we may not feel like He is listening, or that He would want to hear from us. This could not be farther from the truth. If They Had Only Known It says in the  מדרש רותbrought down in the ילקוט שמעוני רות ס’ תרד: 1 ”"אמרו לפני מלכיות,אור גדליהו מועדים 2 Perhaps the need for a verbal declaration of ’הקב”הs Kingship on  ראש השנהrelates to the explanation of  אונקלוסon the verse (ז:ויפח באפיו נשמת חיים ויהי האדם לנפש חיה (בראשית ב. On this he says " "והות באדם לרוח ממללא- that  הקב”הmade Man a living being by giving him the ability to speak. That this is what defines the creation of Man, and that  הקב”הwas given the  שם מלךonly after Man’s creation, it makes sense that Man should use his defining feature in verbalizing a  תכליתof his creation. 3 One could apply this idea to לפני ה’ תטהרו, and לפני מי אתם מטהרים ומי מטהר אתכם. Perhaps this could also be a deeper meaning or amongst the ideas as to why the  עבודהon  יום כפורis לפני ולפנים. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 86 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי  שאילו היה,אמר רב יצחק בא הכתוב ללמדך כשאדם עושה מצוה יעשנה בלב שלם  בכתיפו היה מטעינו, וישמע ראובן ויצילהו מידם,ראובן יודע שהקב”ה מכתיב עליו  אלו היה יודע אהרן שהכתוב מכתיבו וראך ושמח בלבו בתופים.ומוליכו אצל אביו  עגלות פטומות, אלו היה יודע בועז שהכתוב מכתיבו ויצבט לה קלי.ובמחולות היה יוצא  לשעבר אדם עושה, רבי כהן ורבי יהושע דסיכנין בשם רבי יהושע בן לוי.היה מאכילה מצוה נביא כותבה ועכשיו עושה מצוה מי כותבה? אליהו ומלך המשיח והקב”ה חותם .על ידיהם שנאמר אז נדברו יראי ה’ איש אל רעהו ויקשב ה’ וישמע ויכתב Rav Yitzchak said the verse is coming to teach you that when a person does a mitzvah he should do it with a whole heart, because if only Reuven would’ve known that Hashem was writing about him, as it says ‘And Reuven heard (the brothers’ plan) and he saved him (Yosef) from their hands’, he would’ve carried him (Yosef) on his shoulders and taken him all the way back to his father…If Aaron would’ve known that a verse was written on him as it says ‘And he will see you and he will be happy in his heart’, he would’ve come (to greet Moshe) with instruments and music…if Boaz only knew that a verse was being written ‘And he handed her parched grain..’, he would have fed her the choicest meat. Rabbi Cohen and Rabbi Yehoshua D’siknin said in the name of R’ Yehoshua Ben Levi, in the past when someone performed a Mitzvah the Navi would wirte it down, but now (that we no longer have a Navi) who will write down a mitzvah? Eliyahu and Mashiach (will write) and Hashem will sign as it says ‘Then those who fear Hashem spoke to one another, and Hashem listened and heard, and a book of rememberance was written before Him, for those who fear Hashem and those who given thought to His name’. The  מדרשseems a little hard to understand. Is this to say that these three  צדיקיםwould have acted differently “in front of the cameras” so to speak? That if they knew Hashem was going to write their actions and emotions in the  תורהthey would have acted differently? Rav Moshe Weinberger, in his  דרשהfor  שבת שובה תשס”חexplains based on the second part of the מדרש. It used to be when a Jew would do a  מצוהwith a full heart, the  נביאwould write it down, and now that we don’t have any more  נביאיםwho takes note?  אליהוand the  מלך המשיחtake note and  הקב”הsigns. The verse the  מדרשquotes as a source for this was from מלאכי. The פסוקים are written from the last  נביאgiving his last נבואה. He describes that there is coming a time of great  הסתר פניםas there will be no more נבואה. But lest we think that we are alone and no one is listening, or watching anymore, he says  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 87 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון “...'“ ”אז נדברו יראי הThen those who fear Hashem spoke to one another, and Hashem listened and heard, and a book of rememberance was written before Him –”  מלאכיis exhorting us- Hashem is listening, remembering, signing. So how do we explain “ חז”ל ?”אילו היה יודעbrought these examples to teach us to do  מצוות בלב שלם- who knows what’s in a persons heart, its פנימיות- can’t be dealing with an exterior reaction. It can’t mean that if they knew it would be headlines they would have done it bigger- would have brought more to the table for the cameras. Rather, the deeper explanation is that (using  בועזas the example as the  מדרשwas brought in  )רות- if only  בועזwould have known that from this simple relatively fleeting encounter with this woman from another nation, would come  דוד מלכו משיחוand eventually  משיח צדקנוhe would have brought himself differently.4 It doesn’t mean he would’ve brought her better meat. What he brought her was fine. It means he would have brought himself in a different way, as if he was bringing a massive feast, with more energy, more happiness, more feeling. If he would have realized what this moment represented, that  הקב”הwas and is listening and may have big plans from that moment, every moment, then he would have done it  בלבב שלםthe  מדרשis telling us. It was a small lack of אמונה, a lack of feeling that what one does really matters, that  הקב”הis watching every moment of our lives. So the  מדרשis teaching: When you do a mitzvah put your entire being into the מצוה - a person must feel that at any moment, any situation, any  מצוהthat presents itself to us has the potential to be pivotal, perhaps not in our life but in the life of the person/people benefitting, and be of the appropriate magnitude and quality to inscribed in His book. The  נביאwas telling us that we have to know that  הקב”הis listening, ויקשב ה’ וישמע ויכתב. If we only realized this, we would bring ourselves differently to each of our life situations. This is the Time for Our Purpose . ועכשו שנוצרתי כאילו לא נוצרתי,אלהי עד שלא נוצרתי איני כדאי My God, before I was formed I was unworthy, and now that I have been formed, it is as if I had not been formed. Rabbi Baruch Chaim Simon quotes an explanation from R’ Avrohom Yitzchak HaCohen Kook. What does it mean “before I was formed I was unworthy”? During the time before I was created, by the fact that  הקב”הchose not to create me shows that there was nothing in this world that needed me, my השפעה, and vice versa.  הקב”הdidn’t need my תפילות, my עבודה. Otherwise, 4 One can easily apply this idea to the examples of  ראובןand  אהרן הכהןas well- they both would have brought themselves to those key moments (in hindsight) differently if they would have known. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 88 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי I would have been created. Now that I was created, a time has come that the world, something or someone in it needs me in particular or as part of the כלל. As R’ Kook writes- “”הגיעה השעה שאני צריך למלא איזה דבר להשלמת המציאות. Now that I am here, I was created to fulfill my תכלית, it is the proper time for me to have  השפעהand to receive  השפעהfrom the world and the people in it today. The  רבונו של עולםis now ready for my/our עבודה ותפילה. But “now that I have been formed, it is as if I had not been formed.” I have not lived up to my תכלית בהבריאה. We as individuals, we as a community, and we as כלל  ישראלare living together in this time period for a reason. Relating this to our discussion,  הקב”הmade this our time to serve Him, our time to crown Him and come under His מלכות. But we have to come, with ourselves, with the person He wants and created us to be, so  אי”הwe won’t have to say “now that I have been formed, it is as if I had not been formed.” Lefanav Ve’lo K’pesel U’temuna The Kotzker Rebbe in כג( אהל תורה: )פרשת ואתחנן דbrings the following idea based on the פסוק: השמרו לכם פן תשכחו את ברית ה’ אלוקיכם אשר כרת עמכם ועשיתם לכם פסל תמונת כל אשר צוך ה’ אלוקיך Beware lest you forget the covenant of Hashem, your God, that He has sealed with you, and you make yourselves a carved image, a likeness of anything, as Hashem, your God has commanded you.  רש”יseemingly replies to an obvious question- Don’t make a  פסלof that which He commanded you!? He commanded us to make images of things!? We know he told us NOT to make images. So “ רש”יwrites that it means “”אשר צוך לא לעשות- “that He commanded you not to make…”. But the Kotzker thinks this is  דוחקto say the  עיקר פשטis not written in the ( תורהrather the opposite is written). So he explains: the entire idea of  פסל ותמונהis making an image, or exterior form, but that אינו עצם הדבר ממש- it’s not thing itself, just a portrait or exterior of it. Therefore, the  תורהis warning us that in those things which  הקב”הcommanded us- the מצוות-the “’ ”כל אשר צוך ה-do not make of them just forms or images. We need to bring ourselves into them, to do them with the appropriate כוונה, not just do them in form, externally. With a whole heart to be with the King In חובת התלמידים פרק ד, written by R’ Kalonymus Kalman Shapira (the )אש קודש, the holy author exhorts  כלל ישראלto understand who we (as  )כלל ישראלare and how  הקב”הdesires a relationship with each and every one of us. And because  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 89 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון of this special relationship- ““– ”להשכין את אדון עולם בעולמו אשר בראto establish the Master of the World in His world that he created”. A major theme in his ספר is that if we do not appreciate the fact that we can be heard and that we are heard by the מלך, that what we do matters, and by doing the  מצוותand the רצון ’ הwith this הרגשה, we thus establish God’s מלכות, this is what causes a lonely feeling; a feeling that we are here and He, the מלך, is far away and what we do doesn’t really matter. It creates a sense of an almost lazy עבודה, a superficial offering. ’ הsees us daven daily, learn תורה, perform acts of kindness, give charity….the list is almost endless of how much “ תורהgood” our community and other communities perform. However, how do we “bring ourselves” into these acts? Do we really do them thinking that we want to be closer to the מלך, further establish His מלכות, by doing His precepts, and that He is keenly aware and wants “us” within our ?מצוות The  אש קודשrelates a story as a משל: At the onset of WWII, there was a poor תורה-Jew, a real ’ ירא הwhose small  פרנסהdwindled to nothing as the war broke out. Soon he and his family were going hungry. As they were dying of hunger, the Jew went out into the forest to pray with his remaining energy. At that moment of complete and utter despair, he raised his eyes  למרוםand said: (pieces excerpted from the  תפילהwith personal commentary) ... עבדים הקרובים אליך,אנא ה’ עוד קודם שבראת עולמך בחרת בנו להיות בניך Hashem, even before You created the world You had chosen us to be your children, Your servants that are closest to You... The entire purpose of creation with creation of Man was (as stated above) for the establishment and glorification of ’מלכות הin this world, but with a special relationship of servants הקרובים אליו. Initially, when the שכינה was evident, how great it was for us, that: ...לא מן השמים בלבד השמעת את הוד קולך רק גם בנו דברת... we didn’t just hear you from the heavens, rather You spoke directly to us You spoke directly to us at  הר סיניand thereafter through our  נביאיםwho were able to rebuke and direct us in our relationship with You. We could see  מלכות שמיםaround us. But: ...מאוד מר לנו עתה שהסתרת את פניך ממנו... You have hidden your face from us, How terrible is it now that we are in a state of “”הסתר פנים. We no longer are able to clearly see the מלך, the אדון בעולמו. Because of this we feel lost, like there is no one listening. Add to this: OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 90 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי ... הן בעניני פרנסה והן בשאר ענינים,צרות רבות.. the many afflictions we have,whether they be in livelihood or other things, (Note: he was writing immediately pre-Holocaust in Piacezno near Warsaw, at a time of extreme  )הסתר פניםWe are so burdened by our plight to the point that many Jews become unaffiliated with, or worse –apathetic to  תורהand מצוות, like a גוף בלי נשמה. This holy Jew finishes his plea:  אב הרחמן איך.רבש”ע לא עלי בלבד אני מתפלל רק על כל בניך בני ישראל  ואיך תביט כשהם מתבוססים,עזבת את בניך בעולם כל כך עצוב ואיום לבדם  רק אותך אבי, אבל לא את פרנסתינו בלבד אני מבקש,בדם מכותיהם ותחריש ...קרב אותנו והתגלה לנו...אהובי ואת קדושת מלכי Master of the World, I do not come to pray only for myself but on the entire Bnei Yisrael your children. Merciful Father, How can you leave Your children in this world so full of sadness, fearful, alone, and how can You look on when they are downtrodden in the blood of their wounds and stay silent. But not only our livelihood am I requesting, rather (I am asking for) my beloved Father, and the sanctity of my King…bring us close to You and reveal Yourself to us… This  ראש השנהwe again will come before the  מלךto ask for a multitude of important things: life, health, family, livelihood, safety, the safety of ארץ ישראל ויושביה, and so on, almost an endless list….And we will ask for these things after re-declaring Him  מלךvia the סדר התפילות- the “אמרי מלכיות כדי שתמליכוני ”עליכם. All this like we’ve done many times before. However, there comes a time where we just go to the King and say enough is enough- Enough of the צרות, enough of שעבוד גליות, enough of losing  חייליםfighting for the safety of all of כלל ישראל. Enough. Despite continued  הסתר פניםwe know that You are here and that we have Your ear at this time. We know we can affect change because of this. And we know that it is our time in the timeline of the  בריאת האדםto come to you. We want to live up to the  תכליתof our creation. And so we may request many things, but our main desire, our ultimate desire, is You, our King, the מלך מלכי המלכים, to be our King, with our community amongst the entire  בני ישראלnot just paying lip service but actually bringing “ourselves”“ – ”לפניliterally before/in front of You. In the  זכותof us having this הרגשה and crowning the King on ראש השנה, we should all be  זוכהfor the גאולה שלימה ואמיתית, with the rebuilding of our בית המקדש, where we can continue our עבודה in a society with evident ’מלכות ה.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 91 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 92 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 93 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון יום כיפור $ תשרי תשע"ה • TISHREI 5775 Z 94 Y אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON With Their Last Breath: Messages of Repentance, Prayer, and Charity from Selected Zava’ahs Scott J. Farrell, Esq. T $ hroughout my life, I have always associated  ראש השנהand  יום כיפורwith the prayer of ונתנה תקף. Indeed, the ArtScroll  מחזור ליום כיפורcalls it “one of the most stirring compositions in the entire liturgy of the Days of Awe.” Growing up in Belle Harbor, of all of the prayers of the year, this solitary prayer was said by the Congregation, followed by Rabbi Jacob Reiner,1 in a deep, booming voice, repeated the decretal paragraph on English:  מי יחיה. כמה יעברון וכמה יבראון.בראש השנה יכתבון וביום צאם כיפור יחתמון  מי ברעב. מי בחרב ומי בחיה. מי במים ומי באש. מי בקצו ומי לא בקצו.ומי ימות  מי. מי ינוח ומי ינוע. מי בחניקה ומי בסקילה. מי ברעש ומי במגפה.ומי בצמא  ותשובה. מי ישפל ומי ירום. מי יעני ומי יעשר. מי ישלו ומי יתיסר.ישקט ומי יטרף !ותפילה וצדקה מעבירין את רע הגזרה On Rosh Hashanah will be inscribed and on Yom Kippur will be sealed - how many will pass from the earth and how 1  מרא דאתראof Congregation Ohab Zedek, 1968-2002; Assistant Professor of Jewish History, Yeshiva University Scott J. Farrell, Esq. is Of Counsel at Miller Law Offices, PLLC, where his practice consists of civil litigation and corporate law in New York, as well as corporate and securities class action litigation, shareholder derivative matters, and counseling the firm’s clients on complex electronic discovery matters. Scott and his wife Estee are founding members of BKNW, and have three children, Dovid, Chavi and Dina. This article is dedicated in honor of a  רפואה שלמהfor Scott’s sister, רחל מרים בת שפרה יענטא, who is a lung transplant candidate at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. May she be inscribed this year, and every year, in the Book of Life.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 95 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון many will be created; who will live and who will die; who will die at his predestined time and who before his time; who by water and who by fire, who by sword, who by beast, who by famine, who by thirst, who by upheaval, who by plague, who by strangling, and who by stoning. Who will rest and who will wander, who will live in harmony and who will be harried, who will enjoy tranquility and who will suffer, who will be impoverished and who will be enriched, who will be degraded and who will be exalted. But Repentance, Prayer, and Charity avert the severe Decree! These central themes of the  ימים נוראים- repentance, prayer, and charity - are replete in the final thoughts of our predecessors, Rabbinic greats, who, with their last breath (so to speak,) exhorted their children and disciples as to the manner in which they should live their lives. Such documents are called “ ”צואותor Hebrew Ethical Wills.2 While many such  צואותcould each rightfully be the subject of their own articles, the below selected excerpts bearing on repentance, prayer, and charity are particularly appropriate to ponder as we approach the ימים נוראים, not necessarily because of the profoundness of their messages, but sometimes to the contrary, that these are basic truisms that can sometimes get overlooked. Indeed, in the  צואהof R’ Yaakov Hurwitz (a צואה from one of three generations of the Hurwitz family), the  צואהadmonishes that before the coming of ראש השנה, and during the days of עשרת ימי תשובה, their descendants should read through the  צואהto inspire  תשובהand ’אהבת ה. Teshuva With respect to repentance, the  צואותcontain messages not only of the authors’ striving for repentance before death, a hope that their deaths will atone for their sins, but lessons for others concerning the importance of תשובה. These include, among others: • • • ר’ אליעזר הגדול: Put your sins on one side of the scale, and  תשובהwill balance it out. Then add  וידויand prayer, and the scales will weigh in your favor. The רא”ש: Do not retain anger against your fellow man for a single day, but rather humble yourself and ask for his מחילה. ( ר’ אליעזר בן שמואל הלויR’ Eliezer of Mayence): Thirty  אמותfrom my grave, put my coffin on the ground, and drag me to my grave with a rope; pausing every four אמות, so that I may find atonement for my sins. 2 See Hebrew Ethical Wills, selected and edited by Israel Abrahams, a wonderful resource and the book from which excerpts of various  צואותdiscussed herein have been taken from. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 96 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי • • ר’ משה רימוס: The opening and closing of this  קינהconcerns תשובה. He exclaims his hope that his death will atone for his sins, and closes confessing of his sins, and begging Hashem for forgiveness and atonement. ( ר’ אליהו בן רפאל שלמהR’ Eliyahu De Veali): Every morning, commit to saying that you will forgive all who trouble you, and pray for a half hour in synagogue that Hashem should bring to you תשובה. Tefilla The theme of prayer is another common thread running through many צואות. Such observations include: • ר’ אליעזר הגדול: One should be fleet like a deer to read  שמעin the proper hour; in doing so, one glorifies the name of Hashem. Be among the first ten in Synagogue, so that your reward is multiplied a hundred-fold. Moreover, approach Hashem with the deepest reverence, and when davening, make sure to keep in mind before whom you stand. When one davens, hold yourself out as destitute before Hashem, as  יעקבand  דוד המלךdid, in describing themselves in poor, needy and lowly terms. • The רמב”ן: When you daven, remove all worldy concerns from your heart. Place your heart before Hashem, still your innermost thoughts, and meditate before beginning your prayers. By doing this in all days, with all things, you will not sin, and your  תפילותwill be pure and clear. • The רא”ש: Do not daven as if by rote;  תפילהis a service of the heart. If your child would speak to you, but not speak from the heart, would you not be angry? Thus how much more so with respect to our approach to Hashem? • )ר’ יהודה בן רבינו אשר (הרא”ש: To merit righteous children, daven at the graves of the צדיקים התמימים. If you had to speak to a flesh and blood king, how carefully would clear your hearts and mind, and concentrate on proper speech? How much more so one should be when davening to Hashem! Daven in the same congregation, in the same place, and make sure you are among the first. Do not leave immediately after learning or fail to daven where the  ציבורis collected. • The רבינו יעקב בן רבינו אשר (הרא”ש) – טור: He who labors in the soil, his efforts are directed toward producing fruits. So too, all of the efforts of the body, are to support one’s נשמה. The fruit of one’s activity during the day is the time of תפילה, and the fruit of one’s work during the week is !שבת • ( ר’ אליעזר בן שמואל הלויR’ Eliezer of Mayence): My sons and daughters, please go to shul morning and evening, paying close attention to davening and שמע. Be among the first 10 people in shul; daven steadily with the ציבור, paying appropriate regard to each letter and word. Do not talk during davening, d  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 97 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון • • • and say  אמןat the appropriate juncture. ר’ שלמה בן יצחק: My children should daven three times daily in shul, and say all their  תפילותwith devotion. Place your burden upon Hashem, because that which you think is far from you, is often close at hand. Avraham, Yaakov, and Shabtai Hurwitz ( צואהfrom three generations of the family): Go straight from davening to learning תורה. ר’ יונה בן אליהו לאנדסופר: Davening is a service of the heart; of complete concentration upon which no preoccupation should interrupt. One should pray for a repentant and understanding heart, free of jealously and illwill. Use different words in your prayers every day, so they do not become familiar and lose spontaneity. Davening with true emotion is a recognition of Hashem’s rulership over us, and the hope for a pure heart, inspiring a desire to serve God with love and awe. Tzedaka Finally, with respect to charity, our sages of blessed memory have recounted in their צואות, inter alia, that: • ר’ אליעזר הגדול: Show honor to the poor, and draw your soul onto him. Offer  צדקהin secret, not in the public’s sight. Give him food and drink in your house, but do not watch him eat. Do not close one’s ears to the poor, so that Hashem may listen to our appeal when we cry to him. • The רא”ש: Distribute your money wherever Hashem wills, and he will make good any deficit you may have. Look not at he who is above you in riches, but at he who is below. Be responsive to the call of צדקה. Give every week and month, the full amount you can afford, and every day give at least some small amount before תפילה. • ( ר’ אליעזר בן שמואל הלויR’ Eliezer of Mayence): Never turn a poor man away empty handed; give what you can, whether it is a lot or a little. Satisfy the needs of the poor in every way you can. • ר’ שלמה בן יצחק: This  צואהrecounts the various obligations concerning תורה and  מצוותthat the author set upon himself, and should he transgress any of these rules (e.g., eating three meals on )שבת, each rule had a set amount of money he promised to pay to צדקה. Be as charitable as possible, because this is the essence of man’s labor. These thoughts on תשובה,  תפילהand  צדקהare likely not foreign to the reader, but rather constitute what should be the pillars of our faith and practice. Yet, they bear remembering this year, and every year, as we approach the High Holy Days. May these thoughts of repentance, prayer and charity facilitate the message of תקף ונתנה, and act as a vehicle for helping one avoid Hashem’s stern decree. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 98 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Teshuva, Geula and R’ Elazar ben Dordaya (and a little bit of Zechus Avos) Jeremy Herskowitz T $ he eighth  פרקof  מסכת יומאdeals with a number of topics relating to the individual’s observance of יום כיפור, as opposed to much of the first seven  פרקיםwhich focus on the communal  עבודהin the בית המקדש. Among the various topics discussed is, not surprisingly, the  מצוהof תשובה. The  גמרא יומא פוenumerates how different  רבנןpraised the greatness of תשובה. One of the more famous praises (noted on 86b) reads as follows:1 אמר רבי יוסי הגלילי גדולה תשובה שמביאה גאולה שנאמר ובא לציון גואל  מה טעם ובא לציון גואל? משום דשבי פשע ביעקב,ולשבי פשע ביעקב Rabbi Yosi Haglili says: Great is repentance for it brings the redemption, as it says “A redeemer will come to Zion, and to those of Jacob who repent from willful sin”; for what reason will a redeemer come to Zion? Because of those who repent from willful sin”. What is the basis for this connection between  תשובהand ?גאולה On a seemingly basic level, the  מהר”לin  נתיב התשובה פרק בexplains that when a person does תשובה, he separates from his  יצר הרעand, therefore, is redeemed from its dominion.2 And, according to the מהר”ל, this is why the 1 This is the version of the text cited by the עין יעקב. The version commonly found in our edition of the  גמראattributes a similar praise (“ )”גדולה תשובה שמקרבת את הגאולהto רבי יונתן. 2 The  מהר”לexpands on this theme in ’ גבורות הand אור חדש, where he applies it to the redemptions from  מצריםand ( בימי פוריםincluding the concept that  יום הכיפוריםrepresents a spiritual redemption, while  פוריםrepresents a physical redemption =  פוריםand )יום הכיפורים. Jeremy Herskowitz is a real estate attorney at the law firm Haynes and Boone, LLP. Jeremy and Adina, and their children Ayala, Yaira, Azriel and Noam, joined BKNW in 2006.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 99 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון redemptions of the  יובלyear3 – when all Jewish slaves are freed (including those that previously chose to remain with their masters for longer than their original fixed terms), and when ancestral fields and certain ancestral homes are returned to their original owners – specifically occur on  יום כיפורof the  יובלyear, as the תורה כד,ט: ויקרא כהsays “… ”ביום הכיפורים תעבירו שופר בכל ארצכםand “ובכל ארץ אחוזתכם גאולה ”תתנו לארץ. This article will attempt to further explore the  קשרbetween  תשובהand גאולה, particularly in light of the ’מהר”לs understanding. Teshuva and Geula – A Deeper Connection? Rabbi Yitzchak Hutner, in פחד יצחק יום הכיפורים מאמר יא, focuses on the ’מהר”לs reference to the  יום כיפורof יובל. He explains that on the  יום כיפורof יובל, everything returns to its original state of being – and, as we will see, this is what  תשובהis really all about. Furthermore, Rav Hutner notes that while it is only on the  יום כיפורof ( יובלi.e. once every 50 years) that this powerful  כחof renewal is present in the world, there is still some residual  כחof renewal from the previous  יובלyear that is available to us each and every year on יום כיפור, which we can tap into through proper תשובה.4 The following is a summary of Rav Hutner’s approach. The  גמרא עבודה זרה ה ע”אunderstands the  פסוקin א:ספר שמואל ב כג, “נאם ”דוד בן ישי ונאם הגבר הקם על, as a reference to Dovid Hamelech’s role as the person that ‘ דוד – ’שהקים עולה של תשובהestablished the benefit of ( תשובהwith the word “ ”עלapparently being used in a similar sense as תועלת, a purpose or benefit). The  ווילנא גאוןexplains that the word “ ”עלas used in this  פסוקshould actually be interpreted in the sense of עליה, elevating, which would mean that  דודwas the person who elevated תשובה.  תנ”ךrelates various instances of people doing  תשובהwell before דוד, with some notable examples being  אדם הראשוןafter he was thrown out of  ;גן עדןthe  בני ישראלafter  ;חטא העגלand  שאולafter his various עבירות. But none of these instances of  תשובהwere complete.  אדםspent 130 years doing  תשובהfor eating from the עץ הדעת, but even though  הקב”הultimately forgave him, he was not still allowed back into גן עדן. The  בני ישראלdid  תשובהafter the  עגלand were also forgiven, but they only merited receiving the  לוחות שניותthat were written by  ;משהthey were unable to return to the higher level of  קדושהassociated with the לוחות ראשונות that were given directly from ‘ הto בני ישראל. Similarly,  שאולdid  תשובהfor his 3 i.e. the Jubilee Year, which occurs every 50th year following, and is the culmination of, the previous 7  שמיטהcycles (which consist of 7 years each). 4 In the words of Rav Hutner, on the  יום כיפורof  יובלthere is a “ ”קיבוץ אורותof the אורות התשובה from all the previous 49 Yom Kippurs, so that all the other Yom Kippurs are “ ”מוסר את אורוto the  יום כיפורof ( יובלnote the possible implicit reference to the  תורהof Rav Kook, who was an early  רביof Rav Hutner). OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 100 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי  עבירותas well, but even though this  תשובהwas sufficient to gain him both the title “' ”בחיר הand entry into עולם הבא,5 he still lost the kingship. דוד, however, was the first person who, through his תשובה, was able to emerge complete and undiminished by his ( עבירותincluding the incident with  בת שבעand his ill-fated census and accompanying plague); he retained the  מלוכהand became the progenitor of משיח.6 In other words, says the גר”א, through his תשובה, דוד was able to elevate himself back to the same level of  קדושהhe possessed before committing the עבירות, and in so doing he established the power of  תשובהto raise  בני ישראלfrom the depths of their sins without diminishing their קדושה. Additionally, the  פסוקin ל: תהילים לבsays “”אשרי נשוי פשע, which 7חז”ל interpret as ‘’אשרי אדם שגבוה מעוונותיו, praised is the man who is able to become elevated above his sins. This refers to someone who does עבירות, but the עבירות are only חיצוני, they are sins that relate to his physical being and remain external to his inner self; this person’s  עבירותhave no impact on his נשמה, which remains completely pure and intact. Such a person may be judged by ‘ הand found guilty and suffer punishment on account of his עבירות, but they do not affect his פנימיות, the inner essence of who he is will never change no matter how many  עבירותhe does. This person, much like דוד, is someone who is able to become elevated above, or despite, his sins, and  חז”לsay about him “”אשרי, he is praiseworthy. The  תשובהin which we engage throughout the month of אלול, on ראש השנה and during the עשרת ימי תשובה, in conjunction with our fasting and davening on  יום כיפורitself, all serve to cause ‘ הto forgive us and wipe away our עבירות so that we’re not punished for them. But if we have internalized our עבירות, allowing them to affect our  נשמותand to actually become a part of who we are, then merely having our sins forgiven is not sufficient; once the  קדושהof our  נשמהis breached, then even doing 130 years of  תשובהlike  אדםwill not fully repair the damage. What, then, is our remedy? The answer lies in the connection between  תשובהand גאולה. The גאולה of the  יום כיפורof יובל, as described in the תורה, is a physical redemption that causes slaves and property to return to their original state of being. But at the same time, on the  יום כיפורof  יובלthere is the potential for a spiritual גאולה, one ב 5 When the  בעלת אובraises ’שמואלs spirit from the dead,  שמואלtells  שאולthat tomorrow he will be “”עמי, which  חז”לexplain to mean עמי במחיצתי, i.e.  שאולwill die but he’ll join  שמואלin עולם הבא. See יט:שמואל א’ כח. 6 In fact, through his תשובה,  דודmay have elevated himself to a higher level than even the  אבותand  ;משהsee the גמרא פסחים קיט ע”ב, which relates how ’ הwill make a  סעודהfor the צדיקים in the time of  משיחand, after each of the אבות,  משהand  יהושעturns down the  כיבודof leading the  מזומןfor bentching due to various shortcomings in their lives, only  דודis able to accept it. 7 22:11 ( בראשית רבהthere appear to be varying גירסאות, but their meanings are the same).  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 101 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון that will allow our  נשמותto return to their original state of קדושה, despite the damage caused by our sins. This spiritual  גאולהis achieved through our תשובה. And just like the  יום כיפורof  יובלcollects the  אורות התשובהfrom the previous 49 Yom Kippurs, it also shares some of its potential for  גאולהwith each and every annually-occurring יום כיפור. The message of the  מהר”לnow becomes clear - if we properly do  תשובהon יום כיפור, then we too can experience a גאולה, one which will allow us to repair our broken נשמות. Indeed, “”גדולה תשובה שמביאה גאולה.8 The Story of R’ Elazar ben Dordaya One of the more well-known Talmudic stories relating to  תשובהis that of רבי אלעזר בן דורדיא.9 There was a man by the name of  אלעזר בן דורדיאwho accomplished the difficult task of visiting and sinning with every  זונהthat he could find. He then heard of one remaining  זונהwho lived on a far off island and charged an exorbitant fee for her services.  אלעזרtraveled a great distance to reach the  זונהand was prepared to pay the fee in exchange for her services. As he was about to sin with her, the  גמראtells us that she was “”הפיחה, she blew air out of her mouth at  אלעזרand commented that just as the expelled air will never return to her, so too  אלעזרwill never be able to do תשובה. Upon hearing this, Elazar was moved to repent and proceeded to sit between two mountains and valleys, where he requested, in succession, that the mountains and valleys, the heavens and earth, the sun and the moon, and the stars and constellations, should daven for him, but they all refused. Finally, he said “”אין הדבר תלוי אלא בי, whereupon he put his head between his knees and cried out in  תשובהuntil he died. A  בת קולthen proclaimed that  רבי אלעזר בן דורדיאis prepared to enter עולם הבא. )”רבי“( רבי יהודה הנשיא, upon hearing about this incident, famously wept and noted that (1) there are people who can attain  עולם הבאin one hour, while for others it takes many years, and (2) not only does ‘ הaccept such בעלי תשובה, but they are even called ‘’רבי. The  מפרשיםexplain this story in many different ways, both literally and allegorically. I would like to focus on two particular approaches that, when viewed from the proper perspective, highlight the תשובה-גאולה connection. The  מהר”לin  נתיב התשובה פרק חprovides a detailed explanation of each aspect of the story, including the significance of the protagonist’s strange name, אלעזר בן דורדיא. The  מהר”לexplains that the word  דורדיאrefers to the sediment, or dregs, of wine, which settles at the bottom of a wine 8 While Rav Hutner does mention it explicitly, this approach may also help explain the distinction between  תשובה מאהבהversus תשובה מיראה, and how  תשובה מאהבהis able to convert  עבירותinto  זכויותwhile  תשובה מיראהcan only change  זדונותto ( שגגותsee  יומא פו ע”בand the various  מפרשיםthere). 9 See  עבודה זרה יז ע”אfor the complete story. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 102 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי container and is typically discarded (i.e. the פסולת, or waste product, of the wine-making procedure).10 Through his עבירות,  אלעזרhad lowered himself to a state where his entire existence was nothing more than פסולת. Furthermore, his name was ‘’בן דורדיא, the son of, or beneath, דורדיא, implying that he was even lower than פסולת. However, through the application of Rav Hutner’s formulation of true תשובה, perhaps we can suggest that all of his sins were really external ( זנותis the most physical of sins), and through his crying out in  תשובהhe was able to connect to his inner  נשמהand achieve his own personal גאולה. And at that point his first name took over –  אלעזרis a contraction of ‘עזר-’אל, ‘ הwas ready to help him and be  מקבלhis  תשובהas soon as  אלעזרmade the effort. The 11 אריז”לdeals with the question of how someone who spent his entire life committing the worst  עבירותcan just turn it all around in literally his last hour and then go straight to עולם הבא. In a more esoteric approach, the  אר”י הקדושexplains that  אלעזר בן דורדיאwas actually a ( גלגולi.e. a reincarnation of the soul) of יוחנן כהן גדול, about whom the  גמרא ברכות כט ע”אrelates that he served as the  כהן גדולfor 80 years but at the end of his life he became a צדוקי. According to the אריז”ל, when  אלעזר בן דורדיאdid  תשובהat the end of his life, he was actually reclaiming his previous life – a life that was filled with service of ‘ הin the  בית המקדשevery day for 80 years, a life that was certainly worthy of  – עולם הבאand corrected his earlier sin of becoming a צדוקי. In other words, using Rav Hutner’s formulation, אלעזר, in the most literal sense possible, actually returned to his original state of being; through his תשובה, he achieved  גאולהfor himself and יוחנן כהן גדול. Tangentially, Rabbi Yisrael of Rizhin12 asks why ’רביs reaction was to cry upon hearing the story. Why wasn’t  רביhappy that a fellow Jew was going to  ?עולם הבאThe Rizhiner answers that it was because  רביknew there are no free rides to  ;עולם הבאif  רבי אלעזר בן דורדיאsuddenly gained enough  זכויותat the very end of his life to enter עולם הבא, then he must have taken them from someone else who had earned the  זכויותover a long period of time but lost them at the end – in other words, a person such as יוחנן כהן גדול. So  רביcried because he thought that another Jew was losing his עולם הבא. But based on the ’אריז”לs explanation that these two men were one and the same, in reality this was not the case. It is also interesting to compare and contrast the persona of יוחנן כהן גדול with that of אלישע בן אבויה, more commonly known as אחר. Both were צדיקים 10 See the  גמראin  מגילה יב ע”בand עבודה זרה לב ע”א, where  רש”יtranslates ‘ ’דורדיאas ‘’שמרים. 11 As quoted by  רבי חיים ויטאלin 32 ליקוטי תורה – ליקוטי תהילים. 12  מסכת עבודה זרה ד”ה בכה רבי,עירין קדישין  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 103 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון for most of their lives – one was the כהן גדול, while the other was a great תנא and the  רביof  רבי מאירof Mishnaic fame. Similarly, both went off the  – דרךone became a צדוקי, while the other became an אפיקורס. But we find that יוחנן כהן  – גדולin the form of Rabbi Elazar ben Durdia – successfully did  תשובהat the end of his life and was forgiven, while ( אלישע בן אבויהdespite Rabbi Meir’s best efforts) did not do a full  תשובהand was not forgiven (at least during his lifetime). What was the difference between these two men who otherwise seemed to have so much in common? Perhaps we can understand with the help of גמטריא. The  גמטריאof  אלישע בן אבויהis 487. The  גמטריאof Elazar ben Durdia is 585. The difference between the  גמטריאvalues of their names is equal to 98. Interestingly, and I’d like to think not coincidentally, 98 is the  גמטריאof ‘’יפח, which means to blow air.  אלעזר בן דורדיאwas able to internalize the message of the  זונהwho blew air at him, and that prompted him to do  תשובהand gain the title of רבי. But  אלישע בן אבויהfailed to internalize the various messages and calls to do  תשובהthat ‘ הprovided him, so he lost his former title of  רביand instead remained אחר. The Role of Zechus Avos  רבי אלעזר בן דורדיאwas able to effectuate his  תשובהand personal  גאולהthrough the medium of the tears he cried. And this is fitting, since tears come from within us and are a physical manifestation of our פנימיות. When we really, truly cry out from the depths of our hearts, that is our ’נשמהs way of expressing itself in the physical world in which we live. So through his דמעות, his tears,  רבי אלעזר בן דורדיאengaged in the ultimate  תשובהand connected to his inner קדושה.13 This amazing power of  דמעותto effect  תשובהcan be better understood through a story about the ( דברי חייםRabbi Chaim Halberstam, the Sanzer Rav).14 One year in Sanz, a very wealthy supporter of the  קהילהdecided that he wanted to be the  שליח ציבורon יום כיפור, even though he was not much of a בעל תפילה. For political reasons, the  גבאיםasked the Sanzer Rav to convince this  גבירto re-consider. The Sanzer Rav suggested to the  גבירthat they look in ספר תהילים, the book from which so many of our  תפילותare taken, for the qualifications that are needed in order to serve as a שליח ציבור. In ספר תהילים,  תפילהis attributed to three people: ) תפילה למשה90 (פרק, ( תפילה לדוד72 )פרק, and 13 The  גמרא בבא מציעא נט ע”אdescribes the great spiritual power of tears in general “…ואף על  שערי דמעות לא ננעלו, ;”פי ששערי תפילה ננעלוeven though  בזמן הזהthere are times when the gates of  תפילהare sealed to us, the gates of tears always remain open. See also the vort of the Kotzker Rebbe (quoted by Rabbi Yissocher Frand in his shiur on Parshas Nitzavim, Tape #252) on this sugya, where he explains that only the purest tears emanating from our neshamos are able to pass through the gates of tears. 14 As told over by Rabbi Eytan Feiner. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 104 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי ( תפילה לעני102 )פרק. So in order to lead the Shul in תפילה, you must either be (1) a נביא, ענו,  תלמיד חכםand amazing  צדיקwho is  מעביר על מידותיוlike ( ;משה2) an excellent singer like  ;דודor (3) an עני, a poor person. Clearly, the  גבירdid not fit into any of these categories. However, the Sanzer Rav consoled the  גבירby explaining that the  ראשי תיבותof the words דוד,  משהand ( עניi.e.  ד, מand  )עspell the word דמע, a tear; ‘ הis hinting to us that the  תפילותof anyone who sheds a tear (i.e. one who is able to connect to their inner  קדושהand return to their pristine, pre-sin state) will be answered, even if you don’t have the other special qualities. That said, it always struck me as somewhat puzzling that רבי אלעזר בן דורדיא, after asking the heavens and earth and the other inanimate objects to daven for him and getting resoundingly rejected, did not invoke  זכות אבותon his behalf. After all, so many of our  תפילותinvolve invoking the merit of אברהם,  יצחקand יעקב, both on an everyday basis and even more so during the ימים נוראים. Yet instead, he reaches the conclusion that “”אין הדבר תלוי אלא בי, it’s all up to me, and proceeds to cry. But perhaps the language he uses indicates that invoking  זכות אבותwould in fact have worked as well. Citing a מדרש, Rabbi Levi Yitzchak of Berditchev ( )קדושת לוי על מגילת איכה ד”ה אלי ציון ועריהexplains that oftentimes when the word “ ”איןis used in תנ”ך, it implies that something does not exist now but will in the future. For example, the ל: תורה פר’ נח יאsays of שרה “”ותהי שרי עקרה אין לה ולד, she is currently barren but eventually she will have יצחק. Similarly, the second  פסוקin  מגילת איכהsays about ירושלים, “”אין לה מנחם מכל אהביה, hinting that the city has no one to comfort her now at the time of  חורבןbut in the future she will be comforted and rebuilt. And the Berditchever (in what is likely not the  )פשוט פשטalso explains the well-known Talmudic saying15 “אין מזל  ”לישראלin this manner – the word “ ”איןis in fact the Jewish people’s מזל, since when we see the word “ ”איןwe can be certain that the applicable matter which is then lacking will eventually come to fruition. So if we apply this to the words of  רבי אלעזר בן דורדיא- “”אין הדבר תלוי אלא בי, his words imply that at that moment, for רבי אלעזר בן דורדיא, his only avenue to the  תשובהof  גאולהwas through his own crying; but for the rest of בני ישראל, we have another option, namely though our זכות אבות. In conclusion, I would like to suggest that this year on יום כיפור, we have an opportunity to do  תשובהusing both of the weapons in our arsenal, tears and זכות אבות, and through that  תשובהto achieve  – גאולהboth on an individual level and communal level. The יז: בני יששכר מאמר חדש תשרי וexplains that we can fulfill the statement of אלמלי משמרין ישראל שתי שבתות כהלכתן“ חז”ל שבת קיח ע”ב  ”מיד נגאלים- if  בני ישראלwould observe two  שבתותproperly they would be  שבת קנו ע”א15  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 105 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון immediately redeemed, through a  יום כיפורthat falls on  יום כיפור( שבתis called שבת שבתון, implying that there are two  שבתותoccurring simultaneously). If we keep all the  מצוותof  יום כיפורon the one hand, and at the same time we are able to have an  – ענג שבתwhich, since we can’t eat or bring the applicable קרבנות of שבת, is instead fulfilled through our sincere and tear-filled ונשלמה“( תפילות  – )”פרים שפתינוthen we can bring  גאולהimmediately. Similarly, we also have the opportunity for an enhanced  זכות אבותon this יום כיפור, since this year in addition to having the  זכותof אברהם,  יצחקand יעקב, the three  אבותof all of כלל ישראל, we also have the  זכותof our three boys, Naftali, Gilad and Eyal, the זכות of the three  בניםof all of ( כלל ישראלtogether with the  זכותof all the other קדושים in )ארץ ישראל. This year on יום כיפור, may we all be זוכה, through our תפילות, tears,  זכות אבותand זכות בנים, to achieve the  תשובהof  רבי אלעזר בן דורדיא- the ultimate  תשובהof גאולה. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 106 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Avaryanim and Knesses Yisrael Eitan Zerykier O $ n ערב יום כיפור, as we enter the first minutes of the final 25 hours to attain תשובה, the intense mood is set by all the clean white kittels, the multiple  ספרי תורהtaken to the בימה, and the silence held even in a large room filled to the brim with people. Then  כל נדריbegins immediately with the haunting tune used only once a year, and moves every Jewish soul that hears it. Alongside the  פסחSeder,  כל נדריmay be the most heavily attended event of the year for Jews around the world.. Then we read the text, “ ”אנו מתירין להתפלל עם העבריניםand a question immediately arises: after spending  אלולworking our hearts away from the distractions of the year and closer to תשובה, and after many nights of סליחות, and while following closely behind the coronation of Hashem as King on ראש השנה, are we ready to willingly daven together with ?עברינים1 If  תפילהis our version of קרבנות, and it is all we have to offer Hashem, then why would  בני ישראלparticularly declare that we are davening together with the “ ”עבריניםin the very first line of our day dedicated to  ?תשובהCould connecting our  תפילהto  עבריניםdiminish its strength or viability? Could our  תשובהbe rejected or unacceptable to Hashem due to the presence of the  עבריניםalongside us in the  ?בית הכנסתMoreover, should we announce aloud from the  בימהthat we are davening together with them? It may seem at first blanch that we are all עברינים, as the גמרא בבא בתרא  קסד ע”בsays there is no one who is able to refrain from  אבק לשון הרעfor even one day. But there are certain  עבירותwhich are particularly noted by  חז”לas 1 The  רמב”םin מו: מורה נבוכים גstrengthens this curiosity when he teaches that the שעיר לעזאזל cannot be brought on the  מזבחbecause it is not appropriate to bring before Hashem, due to its being too full of עבירות. Eitan Zerykier works as an Operations Associate with QFR Capital Management. Eitan and Rina and their children Moshe and Binyamin joined BKNW in 2009, and were joined by Coby and Yoseph in 2013.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 107 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון being especially strong in their ability to disconnect a person from Hashem. The  רמב”םin מו: מורה נבוכים גmentions  עבודה זרהas one of these examples. Furthermore, the  משנה ברורהin the  הקדמהto הלכות שבת,2 based on multiple sources, but quoting the טו: רמב”ם הל’ שבת לspecifically, states that one who does not keep the  שבתis considered to be disregarding the entire  תורהand disavowing his belief in Hashem having created the world. Nonetheless no distinction is made between the one who speaks  לשון הרעor the מחלל שבת when the  בית דיןannounces we are  מתיריןto daven with the עברינים. It seems no one is prevented from joining with the  קהילהin the  בית הכנסתon יום כיפור. Why? Rav Moshe Feinstein3 reminds us that, ironically, the entire requirement of having ten men for  דברים שבקדושהis learned via a היקש, a scriptural parallel, of the word “ ”תוךbetween a  פסוקrelating to  עדת קרחand from the number of spies which infiltrated  ארץ ישראלand returned with a negative report.4 These are not the upstanding heroes of the תורה, but rather major players in the downfall of בני ישראל. And since these men spoke heresy in public and were still considered part of a quorum, Rav Moshe rules  להלכהthat  מחללי שבתcan be included in מנין. The  רמב”ןcan help to explain how this is so. In his elaboration of Yosef ’s  ברכהfrom יעקב, the  רמב”ןtells us that “”אבן ישראל, which is another term for כלל ישראל, is equated to “”כנסת ישראל.5 Based6 on שיר השירים,  כנסת ישראלis a concept the  רמב”ןconsiders the mystical  בן זוגof the רבונו של עולם.7 כנסת ישראל, as the counterpart to a timeless God, comprises of all Jews on all spiritual levels from all time throughout history and the future. As Hashem’s כלה, this is an all-encompassing and complete personality with an everlasting loving relationship with Hashem. Rav Soloveitchik explains that this means that all  תפילותever offered to Hashem throughout time are really one תפילה.8 Once a person chooses to enter themselves into a  בית הכנסתto pray, the קדושה found within כנסת ישראל, to which he or she is a part, cannot be disregarded or ignored. No  עבירותcan stop a Jew’s  תפילהwhen they decide to join a  מניןor rejoin his fellow in prayer. The  שערי שמיםare always open to a תפילה connected to a  קהילהin a  בית הכנסתbecause that  תפילהis ipso facto connected 2 See also Maasei L’Melech Chapter 3 3 כג:אגרות משה אורח חיים א 4 מגילה כג ע”ב 5  ִמ ָּׁשם רֹעֶ ה ֶא ֶבן, וַ ּיָ פֹּזּו זְ ר ֵֹעי יָ ָדיו; ִמ ֵידי ֲא ִביר יַ עֲ קֹב, וַ ֵּת ֶׁשב ְּב ֵא ָיתן ַק ְׁשּתֹו- כד ד”ה על דרך האמת:עיין רמב”ן בראשית מט יִ ְׂש ָר ֵאל 6 ח:כא; עיין בראשית רבה יא:שיר השירים ג 7 ג ד”ה והאמת:רמב”ן בראשית ב 8 “The Synagogue as an Institution and as an Idea,” in The Rabbi Joseph Lookstein Memorial Volume, ed. L. Landman, Hoboken, NJ: Ktav, 1980 OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 108 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי to all of כנסת ישראל, an indivisible and invisible unified force, spanning all time. When we daven with עבריני הדור, we are also davening with ;צדיקי הדור when we daven with our children, we are also davening with grandchildren and their grandparents; when we daven with the living, we are also davening with the  קדושיםwho gave their lives על קידוש השם. When we daven with a מנין of ten, we are davening with the seven  אושפיזיןas well. There is a macro-community throughout history, and a microcommunity found when ten men walk in the pouring rain to say “אשרי יושבי  ”ביתךtogether on a gloomy Tuesday afternoon. Both are connected, both are eternal, and both have a powerful and unbreakable bond with Hashem. This may also explain how we say “ ”עם כל ישראל אחיהםin our  משברךon שבת. Indeed, all our brothers and sisters are enjoin with us in one singular unit when we daven. As well, in  קדישthere is a strange imbalance between the last three lines. We refer to  כל ישראלwhen requesting peace two times from Hashem (הוא יעשה שלו’ עלינו ועל כל... יהא שלמא רבא מן שמיא וחיים עלינו ועל כל ישראל )ישראל, but use the term  כל בית ישראלwhen requesting that Hashem accept our prayers ()בחייכון וביומיכון ובחיי דכל בית ישראל. Indeed, peace is requested for all of ישראל, but when we offer a  תפילהto Hashem, we connect to every בית הכנסת in the world, because we are davening together as one. We become greater than just our בית הכנסת, and instead become part of בית ישראל. The גדולי הדור, the עברינים, and even us regular run-of-the-mill  בינוניםare all part of כנסת ישראל and  בית ישראלwhen we raise our voices in prayer to Hashem. When we welcome the עברינים, and announce their presence in our Shul, may it be that we reconnect our hearts in  תפילהwith all of כנסת ישראל. In turn, we hope Hashem will remember our זכות אבות, the זכות קדושים, and reply to our prayers as He has to the  אבותand prior generations throughout the centuries, by not only accepting our תפילות, but also granting us peace in ארץ ישראל, and across the world now and for eternity.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 109 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 110 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי The Sa’ir LaAzazel: A Process of Inspiration Moshe Buchbinder H $ aving experienced the month of  אלולand ראש השנה, we arrive at יום  כיפורwith a sense of awe and fear. Our focus is singular: Achieving atonement for all of the sins we have committed during the past year. During the times of the בית המקדש, the experience of  יום כיפורwas vastly different than it is today. Nowadays, we attempt to reach our spiritual goals through doing תשובה, by davening our hearts out, and observing the five עינוים. However, during the days of the בית המקדש, the  יום כיפורexperience was centered around the  עבודהof the כהן גדול, much of which was witnessed by כלל ישראל. The  פסוקיםat the beginning of  פרשת אחרי מותdescribe a major part of this עבודה, which was that of the שני שעירים. Two goats that were practically identical were subject to a lottery by the כהן גדול. One goat would be designated as the ‘שעיר לה, which became a  קרבן חטאתand underwent the sacrificial process in the בית המקדש. Its blood was sprinkled on the  מזבחand its organs were offered on the  מזבחlike other קרבן חטאת. The second goat was designated as the שעיר לעזאזל. On this goat, the  כהן גדולperformed  סמיכהand וידוי, leaning on the animal’s head and reciting a confession on the sins of all כלל ישראל. He then sent the goat, with a messenger referred to as the איש עתי, literally, the “designated man,” out of the  בית המקדשand through the desert to a cliff called  עזאזלwhere it was pushed off to its demise. The  שעיר לעזאזלwas an integral part of the process in that it facilitated  כפרהfor vast quantities of the sins of the  בני ישראלincluding those that warranted  כרתor  מיתב בית דיןto the extent that  תשובהwas performed (see ב:)רמב”ם הלכות תשובה א. The Approach of the Rambam to the Sa’ir LaAzazel • Question #1: Why is this service necessary for the  ?עבודת יום הכיפוריםWhy couldn’t a regular  חטאתoffering on the  מזבחachieve  כפרהfor the בני ישראל Moshe Buchbinder is an investment banker at BMO Capital Markets. Moshe, Ilana, and their children, Aiden, Molly, Becky and Shayna, joined BNKW in 2013.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 111 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון in the way that it typically could for sins during the rest of the year? Question #2: Why did this process need to be so graphic? The expulsion from the בית המקדש, journey through the desert, harshness of the cliff, and unsightly imagery of the goat dismembering as it fell down the mountainside are represented quite vividly in the  פסוקיםand מסכת יומא. Why were all of the theatrics necessary? The  רמב”םin מו: מורה נבוכים גexplains that a regular  קרבן חטאתwould not suffice to facilitate a  כפרהfor the massive quantity of sins committed by כלל  ישראלduring the course of the year. The כהן גדול, through the process of סמיכה and “ וידויtransferred” all of these sins onto the שעיר לעזאזל. The  שעיר לעזאזלwas so loaded with  עבירותand was so spiritually filthy, that its presence would not be tolerated in the בית המקדש, let alone be brought onto the holy מזבח. It was therefore summarily dismissed from the  בית המקדשand banished to a desolate area where it was unceremoniously terminated. A fitting end for the uniquely dense concentration of טומאה.1 The  רמב”םfurther explains the need for the graphic process: Looking at the  יום כיפורexperience of the Jews during the times of the בית המקדש, one might think that the abundance of rituals served as a “silver bullet” and mechanical process for achieving כפרה. All that seemingly needed to be performed by the  כהן גדולwas a day of elaborate services, and presto, instant  כפרהfor all of כלל ישראל. In fact, this was not true. Rather, the purpose of all of the  עבודות המקדשand  קרבנותwas to evoke an emotional reaction from כלל  ישראלwhich would inspire us to do תשובה. The expulsion of the שעיר לעזאזל was meant to do just that. It was meant to physically exhibit how far we must go in distancing ourselves from all of our עבירות. They must be banished from our environment into a desolate area devoid of humanity and killed decisively in a way that eliminates any risk that they creep back into our daily lives. The  שעיר לעזאזלtherefore served as a visual aid to catalyze our personal and communal תשובה. • Why Two Goats? The  תורהin ה: פרשת אחרי מות טזsays: “ ומאת בני ישראל יקח שני שעירי עזים לחטאתand from the Bnei Yisroel he should take two kid goats for a Chatas”. Reb Zalman Sorotzkin in his Sefer  אזנים לתורהasks, why does the  פסוקsay he should take two for a  חטאתif in fact only one is ultimately offered as a  חטאתwhile the other is sent ?לעזאזל He answers with the following explanation. Normally, a קרבן חטאת 1 The י – אלשיך הקדוש- ה: ויקרא טזdevelops this ideas as well as part of a discussion of the ’רמב”ןs Kabbalistic approach to the שעיר לעזאזל. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 112 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי contains four essential elements: ( סמיכהleaning), ( וידויconfession), מתן דמים (sprinkling the blood on the  )מזבחand ( הקרבת אימוריםoffering the organs on the )מזבח. Interestingly, if one looks at these two goats, each one actually only received two of the four essential elements: The  סמיכהand  וידויwere done on the  שעיר לעזאזלwhile the sprinkling of the blood and offering of the organs on the  מזבחwere done on the ’שעיר לה. From this he concludes that the two goats were actually part of one holistic ritual. He further explains, that the need for two goats is logical based upon the approach above. No one goat carrying the mass quantity of  עבירותcould be offered on the מזבח. It needed to be terminated outside of the בית המקדש. However, this alone would lack some of the elements that are essential to the definition of a true קרבן חטאת. It therefore needed a counterpart to share the elements of the procedure and provide for the parts of the  עבודהthat could only be performed inside the בית המקדש. Hence שני שעירי עזים לחטאת. Sa’ir LaAzazel – A Positive Opportunity or Not? If one is asked which  שעירhad the “better job” so to speak, the one ‘ להor the one לעזאזל, it would be fairly straightforward to conclude that it was the שעיר ’לה. After all, it was offered in the  בית המקדשin a dignified manner, unlike its counterpart that was burdened with mass quantities of  עבירותand shoved off a cliff. A more interesting question is whether the animal selected as the שעיר  לעזאזלwas lucky or unlucky in that it was chosen for the role (versus being back in the barn and not selected for any role at all). To help answer this question, the  אלשיך הקדושprovides a fascinating insight. The י: פסוק טזsays that after the ‘ שעיר להwas processed as a חטאת: “ – והשעיר אשר עלה עליו הגורל לעזאזל יעמד חי לפני ה’ לכפר עליוand the goat upon which the lot fell for Azazel stood alive before Hashem to atone on it”. What is the purpose of this  ?פסוקAfter all, at this point the  תורהhad not yet even instructed what to do with the שעיר לעזאזל, so it seems obvious that it was still standing there waiting to be dealt with? The  אלשיך הקדושexplains that the role of the  שעיר לעזאזלwas of incredible importance. It was destined to actually provide nearly all of  כלל ישראלwith  כפרהfor nearly all of their עבירות.2 Imagine the  זכותof this animal! So while it is true that it did get the worse job relative to the ‘שעיר לה, in that it became burdened with massive quantities of עבירות, the  תורהsalutes the role of the  שעיר לעזאזלas one which is ’– לפני ה doing the bidding of the Almighty by providing a  כפרהfor the  עבירותof כלל  ישראל. The  אלשיךnotes that these words serve as an appeasement for the שעיר  לעזאזלwhich was undoubtedly saddened by its unfortunate lot. Perhaps this c c c c ש ש ש 2 Certain  עבירותwere atoned for by the ’ שעיר להand the  עבירותof the  כהניםby other קרבנות.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 113 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון provides an indication that the goat which ultimately earns the title of לפני ’ הwas still better off than any other animal which was given no opportunity at all. Furthermore, perhaps it is also possible to conclude that the שעיר לעזאזל was more fortunate than any goats that were not selected at all based upon two specific  הלכותpertaining to the remains of the  שעיר לעזאזלafter it had been pushed down the mountain. First, the  גמרא יומא סד ע”אexplains that the pushing of the goat off the cliff has the same effect as שחיטה. Second, the  גמרא יומא סז ע”בconcludes that the limbs of the dismembered goat are מותר  בהנאהso that people will not inadvertently benefit from it באיסור. The release from a spiritual quarantine suggested by both of these elements support the conclusion that in death, the  שעיר לעזאזלis cleansed from its repulsive status as  טומאהcarrier and appreciated for the positive contribution which it made for  כלל ישראלin facilitating the כפרה. Halachik Insights Based Upon the Approach of the Rambam The ’רמב”םs elucidation of the  שעיר לעזאזלas (i) too  טמאfor the  מקדשand (ii) a vehicle for inspiring  תשובהvia its graphic expulsion from the  מקדשmay provide numerous fascinating insights into some of the more surprising דינים that surround the  שעיר לעזאזלprocess, especially those relating to the איש עתי. Query #1: Why an Ish Iti? The  תורהin כא: אחרי מות טזstates that after the  כהן גדולperformed  סמיכהand וידוי on the שעיר לעזאזל, he sent a messenger referred to as the  איש עתיto transport the  שעירto עזאזל. This requirement is different from the protocol of the rest of the day because the  גמרא יומא לב ע”בstates: כל עבודות יום הכיפורים אינן כשרות אלא  – בוall of the formal  עבודהcomponents of the day (such as the קטרת, קרבנות, and  )הטבת הנרותcould only be performed by the  כהן גדולwith no exceptions. Yet, the  תורהcommands that the  שעיר לעזאזלwas required to be done by someone else as the  שליחof the כהן גדול. That means that categorically the only individual3 who could not process the transport of the  שעיר לעזאזלwas the כהן גדול. Why do we need the role of the  איש עתיin the first place and why is the  כהן גדולprecluded from doing this very important task himself? Perhaps the insight of the  רמב”םexplains this requirement. Once the  שעירwas loaded with the  עבירותof כלל ישראל, it needed to be distanced as far as possible from קדושה. Just like it could not stay in the  מקדשwhich is the highest concentration of קדושה, it is logical to conclude that it could not be handled by the  כהן גדולwho was the holiest person performing the holiest 3  לוי,כהן, or  ישראלwere all  כשרto be the איש עתי, though only  כהניםwere designated as such. See 66a. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 114 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי tasks of the day. However, because all of the roles of the day needed to be performed by the  כהן גדולthis conundrum required the  כהן גדולto designate his  שליחto transport the  שעיר לעזאזלaway from the  קדושהof the  מקדשas well as away from himself. Query #2: Why the Ish Iti Even if Tamei? One highly unusual  הלכהof the  איש עתיis found in the  גמרא יומא סו ע”בwhich tells us that if he becomes  טמאafter being designated by the  כהן גדולbut before he performs his role on יום כיפור, he is permitted to enter the  מקדשin a state of  טומאהto perform his task, as the  גמראexplains the word  עתיas “עתי – אפילו ”בטומאה. Permission to bring  טומאהinto the  מקדשis normally prohibited based upon the  פסוקof ולא יטמאו את מחניהם,4 and exceptions are extremely rare.5 Why does the Torah allow it for the  ?איש עתיWhy not just find a replacement who is ?טהור Perhaps here too the ’רמב”םs explanation may elucidate the דין. If the entire purpose of the  שעיר לעזאזלis to inspire  תשובהand distance ourselves from  עבירותand other forms of negative spiritual energy, then the notion of permitting a  טמאperson to enter the  מקדשin order to accomplish this goal is rather rational. It enhances the vivid imagery of the process as a  טמאman leads a goat filled with  עבירותaway from the  קדושהand out to the wilderness. Therefore, unlike in the usual situation where the  מקדשis the inviolable epicenter of  קדושהand has no room for the presence of טומאה, here, the מקדש is not “defiled” by the  טומאהbut rather uses the  טומאהin a constructive way to further its central purpose of bringing about תשובה. Because the טומאה therefore is not a flaw in the process, the designated man should continue to perform his שליחות, rather than be replaced with a  טהורnon-designated alternative individual. Query #3: Why the Wait? The  משנה יומא סח ע”בstates and the ח: רמב”ם הלכות עבודת יוה”כ גcodifies that the  כהן גדולcould not leave the ( עזרהwhere the lottery took place) and go on to continue the next procedure of the  סדר היוםof reading the  קריאת התורהin the  עזרת נשיםuntil the  שעירreached the desert, i.e., not when it got pushed off the cliff, but well before - when it first reached the desert. This timing seems odd because one would think that since the  איש עתיwas the  שליחof the כהן גדול, the  כהן גדולshould either (a) be allowed to continue the  סדר היוםonce the איש עתי took the goat and left, or alternatively (b) he should have to wait all the way 4 עייו רמב”ם מנין המצוות ל”ת עז 5 Although it does exist, for instance when most of  כלל ישראלis  טמאand needs to bring קרבן פסח.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 115 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון until the goat was pushed off the cliff. Why is the line in the sand (literally) at the desert and why does the role of the  כהן גדולseem to end prematurely?6 Here too, the rationale of the  רמב”םis insightful. The Kohen Gadol’s job on  יום כיפורis not to handle each and every minute aspect of the עבודת יום הכיפורים. In fact, there were certain points in the  עבודהwhere a second כהן was called to assist the  כהן גדולin non-core procedural elements, including finishing  שחיטהon the  קרבן תמידafter the basic requirement was met by the ( כהן גדולi.e., cutting most of both pipes).7 Rather, the real job of the כהן גדול was to perform the technical aspects of  עבודהthat affect atonement. One of the major components thereof was inspiring the  בני ישראלto do  תשובהvia the  שעיר לעזאזלprocessing. The  רמב”םstates that the reason the  שעירwas sent to the  ארץ גזירהwas that “”שאין בה יישוב. No one lives there. It is beyond the end of the city limit and represents isolation. That is where people are not found and therefore that is the symbolism of where  עבירותbelong. To the extent that the goal of the שעיר  לעזאזלis to inspire  תשובהand thereby facilitate atonement as the  רמב”םstates, the central goal of the  שעיר לעזאזלis actually completed once no one is around to internalize the message of the expulsion, and that occurs at the edge of the desert, not the cliff. Therefore, the edge of the desert is where the role of the  כהן גדולshould end. To be clear, the goat still must be pushed off the cliff and terminated in accordance with the הלכה, that is definitely part of the  מצוהof the שעיר לעזאזל, but that is not part of the  תשובהfacilitation goal and therefore is outside the scope of the Kohen Gadol’s personal responsibilities. He may then therefore carry on with the activities once the goat reaches the מדבר even before it is pushed off the cliff. Conclusion As mentioned above, the  רמב”םbegins  הלכות תשובהby highlighting that the  שעיר לעזאזלwas integral to our  כפרהduring the times of the בית המקדש. He then adds in the following  הלכהthat today, when we do not have a  בית המקדשor מזבח, our only means for achieving  כפרהis through תשובה. Heading into יום כיפור, may we all reflect on the real purpose of the שעיר לעזאזל: Inspiring our davening, advancing our תשובה, and bringing us one step closer to achieving our spiritual goals and the rebuilding of the בית המקדש במהרה בימינו. 6 See Rav Yosef Dov Halevi Soloveitchik –  קובץ חידושי תורהpage 120-122. The Rav raises this question and provides a answer based upon the definition of the  עבודהof the כהן גדול regarding his designating the איש עתי. 7 יומא לב ע”ב OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 116 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 117 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון סוכות $ תשרי תשע"ה • TISHREI 5775 Z 118 Y אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON Teishvu K’en Taduru: Treating the Sukkah as One’s Home Rabbi Yehuda Balsam T $ he  תורהcommands us “ ”בסוכות תשבו שבעת ימים- “You should dwell in Sukkos for seven days.” (מג: )ויקרא כגThe  משנהin מסכת סוכה כח ע”ב explains this to mean that for these seven days one must make his  סוכהinto his permanent dwelling area. רש”י, on the גמרא סוכה כ ע”ב ד”ה לא יצא, explains that the three main activities that are to be performed in the  סוכהare  ושינה, שתיה, אכילה- eating, drinking and sleeping.  חז”לunderstood that these are the primary activities for which one requires shelter in order to perform. Since one would normally perform these activities in his own home, he must now do them in the סוכה. This  כללof  תשבו כעין תדורוalso leads to a number of instances in which one would not be obligated to dwell in a סוכה. Any time that one would feel so uncomfortable in the סוכה, where had he been in his own house he would have left in search of better accommodations, he need not remain in the סוכה. This rule is known as  מצטער פטור מן הסוכה- one who is in discomfort (because of the  סוכהenvironment) is released from the obligation of סוכה.1 The  גמראoffers numerous applications of this rule which are beyond the scope of this discussion (see תרמ-)שלחן ערוך סימן תרלט. What follows is a short list of situations in which the application of this rule is disputed among the פוסקים. The Nature of the Obligation Considering the fact that one can technically avoid performing those activities which obligate him to live in the סוכה, the  פוסקיםcontemplate the following issue. Is the  מצוהof  סוכהan obligation, which if avoided is considered a lost and nullified opportunity ()ביטול מצות עשה, or is it an optional  מצוהthat if avoided is not considered lost in any way? (This discussion does not include 1  כ”ו ע”א- גמרא סוכה כה ע”ב Rabbi Yehuda Balsam is a Rebbe in the DRS Yeshiva High School For Boys. Yehuda, his wife Chavie, and their children Pinny, Noach, Bayli, and Mali joined BKNW in March of 2005.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 119 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון the first night of  סוכותwhich everyone acknowledges to be obligatory.) The  תשב”ץ ח”א סימן קwrites clearly that the  מצוהof  סוכהis a “ ”רשות גמור- completely optional. This means that although if one wishes to eat or sleep he must do so in a סוכה, he is by no means obligated to engage in these activities. Similarly, the  מנחת חינוך מצוה שכה אות יlikens our  מצוהto the  מצוהof ציצית. Just as one who is not wearing a four-cornered garment has no obligation to wear ציצית, so too one who does not wish to eat is in no way  חייבto be in a סוכה. However, the רט: מהרש”ם אcites a number of sources, including the  גמראin מנחות מא ע”א which state that one who chooses not to actively obligate himself to perform a  מצוהis punished for this. Thus, even if one agrees that there is no obligation at all, it is still wise to ensure that one is able to fulfill this מצוה. On the other hand, some  פוסקיםwrite that the  מצוהof  ישיבה בסוכהis as obligatory as any other מצות עשה, and one has no right to avoid it. The יסוד יב: ושורש העבודה יאattempts to prove this from the אבודרהם. He goes so far as to say that one who is sitting in his סוכה, and enters his house to get a drink should make sure not to spend any extra time in his house in order not to be  מבטלhis  מצוהof ישיבה בסוכה. Regardless of which opinion one accepts, everyone agrees that spending time in the  סוכהconstitutes a fulfillment of a מצות עשה מדאורייתא. Taking a Trip  רב משה פיינשטייןin צג: אגרות משה או”ח גwas asked a  שאלהconcerning whether it is  מותרto take a trip on  סוכותduring which one will be eating and/or sleeping outside of a ( סוכהsuch as a camping trip). Since the  דיןof  תשבו כעין תדורוtells us that one should live in the  סוכהin the same way he lives in his home, perhaps someone who would have spent the time outside of his house is permitted to do the same regarding his סוכה. Furthermore,the  גמרא סוכה כו ע”בwrites that  הולכי דרכים- those who are going on a trip - are  פטורfrom living in a סוכה. However,  רב משהprohibits such an activity for two reasons. First of all, the דין of  תשבו כעין תדורוdoes not include an individual who simply chooses to leave the סוכה, even if he would have chosen to leave his house in order to embark on a similar trip. His proof to this is that the  גמראuses the phrase “מצטער פטור ”מן הסוכה, which only includes an individual who is pained or bothered by the environment in the סוכה. Had the  גמראwished to permit leaving the  סוכהfor leisure, it would have stated that one who enjoys sleeping outside rather than in his house is  פטורfrom the סוכה. This statement would have included any and all reasons for wanting to leave the סוכה, and  קל וחומרone who is מצטער. As for the  גמראwhich absolves הולכי דרכים,  רב משהexplains that this is only speaking of one who goes on a business trip, not a vacation. רש”י f OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 120 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי himself writes ()שם ד”ה הולכי, “Just as one would not refrain from leaving his house for business, he need not refrain from such a trip as long as it is not יום טוב.” However, the  משנה ברורה תר”מ ס”ק לטexplains the phrase הולכי דרכים almost identically to רש”י, but instead of writing for business he writes “מלנסע ”לאיזה ענין- he travels for whatever reason. This implies that the משנה ברורה understands the  גמראdifferently than רב משה. His second reason is based on the aforementioned  גמראin מנחות. Even if one was to assume that the  דיןof  תשבו כעין תדורוdoes permit leaving the  סוכהin order to go camping, it is certainly  אסורto purposely circumvent this special מצוה, which can only be fulfilled for one week of the entire year. Such an individual is the same as one who chooses to remain  פטורfrom wearing ציצית by not purchasing a בגד של ד’ כנפות, and, as the  גמראexplains, is punished for this in a time that ‘ הis angry. Rav Moshe’s opinion is shared by רב שלמה זלמן אוירבאך, quoted in הליכות שלמה ח”ב עמוד קעב, though for a different reason. He explains that since one can plan his trip to fall out any other time he wants, he has no right to do it  דוקאon סוכות. He offers proof to this from the ג: רמ”א תרמwho writes that one who wishes to be  מקיז דם- to let blood - on  סוכותis still  חייבto live in a סוכה. The  מגן אברהם סק”דexplains that he is  חייבbecause he should have done this procedure before יום טוב. So too, one has no right to schedule a trip which will impair his ability to live in the סוכה. Another possible reason to prohibit this trip is offered by רב בנימין זילבר in לד:אז נדברו יא. He quotes the מ: משנה ברורה תרמin the name of the  לבושwho writes that one who is on a trip need not even refrain from eating in hopes of finding a  סוכהalong the way, but at night he must certainly seek out a סוכה. However, if he can obtain access to a  סוכהwith little effort, he must do so.  רב זילברadds that nowadays it is so easy to gain access to a סוכה, one has no excuse not to, at the very least, bring a portable  סוכהon his trip.  רב יוסף שלום אלישיבin his  הערות למסכת סוכה דף כוis quoted as arguing against Rav Moshe’s decision. He argues that since today I have a desire to go on a trip, the  דיןof  תשבו כעין תדורוpermits me to do so. The whole logic behind  הולכי דרכיםbeing  פטורfrom living in a  סוכהis simply that they want to travel in order to make money, which is certainly an optional task. Similarly, one has the right to engage in an optional trip if that’s what he wants to do, and would have left his house in order to do so. Furthermore, the  גמראin מנחות which dooms such a person to punishment for circumventing the obligation to do a  מצוהdoes not apply to our case. In מנחות, the  גמראwas dealing with someone who bought a  בגדthat did not have  ד’ כנפותand would therefore never have a  מצוהto wear ציצית. Here, we are speaking about someone who is  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 121 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון engaged in the  מצוהof  ישיבה בסוכהthe rest of יום טוב, and wishes to take a break for a day or two. Thus he would not be worthy of punishment. Types of Decorations The גמרא סוכה כח ע”א, in describing how one fulfills תשבו כעין תדורו, explains that one should bring his nice  כליםinto the סוכה. This implies that whatever fancy dishes or cutlery one normally uses on  יום טובshould be used in the סוכה.dרב  משהhas a לו( תשובה: )או”ח הconcerning a certain  רבwho was telling people that they must decorate their  סוכותwith the same types of decorations that they use in their own homes, not the temporary ones that have become popular among the masses. However,  רב משהrejects this completely. He explains that the  דיןof  תשבו כעין תדורוis only relevant to the manner in which one dwells in the סוכה, not to the  סוכהitself. The  סוכהis by definition a temporary dwelling place and is not necessarily able to stand all year round, and the decorations may certainly reflect this. One must live in the  סוכהas if it was his primary residence, thus necessitating the use of the nicer כלי סעודה, but need not decorate it as such. As we have seen, we should do all that we can during the  יום טובof סוכות to make the  סוכהour primary residence. Hopefully we will be able to fulfill this  מצוהproperly, and all live to see the rebuilding of the סוכות דוד הנופלת. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 122 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Borrowed Sukkah vs. Borrowed Lulav Rabbi Yechiel Kalmenson $ R egarding the 2 principal  מצוותof סוכות,  סוכהand לולב, we find an interesting difference between them. In connection to both מצוות the  תורהuses the word “”לך\לכם1 to imply that the  סוכהor  לולבneed to belong to you in order to fulfill the מצוה. However, there is a difference in regard to borrowing to fulfill both of these מצוות.  כשם שאין אדם יוצא ידי חובתו ביום טוב הראשון: רבי אליעזר אומר:תניא  דכתיב ולקחתם לכם ביום הראשון פרי עץ הדר כפת,של חג בלולבו של חבירו  דכתיב חג, כך אין אדם יוצא ידי חובתו בסוכתו של חבירו,תמרים – משלכם  אף על פי שאמרו אין:הסכת תעשה לך שבעת ימים – משלך וחכמים אומרים  אבל יוצא ידי חובתו,אדם יוצא ידי חובתו ביום טוב הראשון בלולבו של חבירו  מלמד שכל ישראל-  דכתיב כל האזרח בישראל ישבו בסכת,בסוכתו של חבירו  האי לך מאי דרשי ביה? מיבעי ליה למעוטי, ורבנן.ראוים לישב בסוכה אחת ) (סוכה כז ע”ב. כתיב כל האזרח-  אבל שאולה,גזולה We have learned: Rabbi Eliezer Says: “Just as a person cannot fulfill his obligation on the first day of Sukkos with a lulav that [he borrowed from] his friend, for it is written: ‘And you shall take for yourselves on the first day, the fruit of a beautiful tree…,’ i.e., [these species must be] your own. So too, a person does not fulfill his obligation [using] a sukkah that [he borrowed from] his friend, for it is written: ‘You shall celebrate the festival of Sukkos for seven days for yourselves, ’ i.e., [the sukkah] must be from your own…. (Sukkah 27b) In short, while  רבי אליעזרholds that both a borrowed  סוכהand a borrowed 1 Regarding  סוכהsee יג חג הסכת תעשה לך שבעת ימים:דברים טז. And regarding  לולבsee מ:ויקרא כג ולקחתם לכם ביום הראשון פרי עץ הדר כפת תמרים. Rabbi Yechiel Kalmenson Teaches Limudey Kodesh at The Shluchim Online School and assists with Chabad activities in the area. Rabbi Yechiel and Shayna moved to North Woodmere with their children Mendel and Mussia in 2013.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 123 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון  לולבare not acceptable because of the term “”לך,  חכמיםhold that the כל“ פסוק  ”האזרח בישראל ישבו בסכותimplies that “( ”כל ישראל ראוים לישב בסוכה אחתAll Jews are worthy to sit in one  )סוכהand the only way for this to be accomplished is if we allow for one to borrow a סוכה. What then does the word “ ”לךin reference to  סוכהteach us? It teaches us that a stolen  סוכהis invalid. The  הלכהfollows the opinion of חכמים, that while a borrowed  לולבcannot be used on the first day of סוכות, a borrowed  סוכהcan be used. (ב:)או”ח תרלז At first glance it would seem that the reason why “ ”לךin reference to  סוכהdoesn’t exclude a borrowed  סוכהis because the  לימודfrom  כל האזרחshows us that the  סוכהdoesn’t have to actually belong to you, and that the “ ”לךis only coming to exclude a stolen סוכה. However the ג: שלחן ערוך הרב או”ח תרלזclearly implies that a borrowed סוכה is included in the requirement of “”לך: f f  כלומר שתהא הסוכה שלך, לך משלך,אע”פ שאמרה תורה חג הסכות תעשה לך  דכיון שנכנס לה, אעפ”כ יוצא אדם ידי חובתו בסוכה שאולה.ולא של חברך .ברשות הרי היא כשלו Although the Torah says Chag HaSukkot Taaseh Lecha, “Lecha” meaning that it has to be yours and not your friend’s. Nevertheless, a person fulfills his obligation with a borrowed sukkah; since he went in with [his friend’s] permission it is as if it is his. (Emphasis added) The Rav explains it even further in סעיף י”א: אין לישב בסוכה העומדת בקרקע של חבירו מפני שאינה נקראת שלו ממש והתורה אמרה תעשה לך משלך ואינה דומה לשאלה ממש שהשאילה לו מדעתו והרי היא כשלו ממש A person should not dwell in a sukkah standing on land belonging to his friend, for it is not actually called “his own,” and the Torah says: “Ta’aseh Lecha” i.e., from your own. [Such a stolen sukkah] does not resemble a sukkah that is borrowed… Since [a sukkah] is borrowed with [the owner’s] permission, it is as if it is actually his [the borrower’s]. (Emphasis added) So the Rav makes it quite clear that a borrowed  סוכהis  כשרbecause using a  סוכהwith permission makes it “( ”שלוthe borrower’s).2 Why does the same reasoning not apply to a borrowed לולב, where we say that on the first day the  לולבhas to actually belong to you and cannot be borrowed? 2 The source of the Rav’s  שיטהseems to be from the  לבוש סעיף בwho understands it this way in רש”י סוכה כ”ז ע”ב ד”ה כל האזרח. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 124 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Difference in the Definition of the Mitzvos of Sukka and Lulav The difference may be clarified by looking at a fundamental difference between these 2 מצוות.3 When a person lends something, he lends it with the intention that the borrower should use it for its intended purpose. Therefore when a person lends a  סוכהto his friend he is lending it so his friend will use it as a סוכה. The  חיובof  מצות סוכהis  – תשבו כעין תדורוto dwell in the  סוכהas you would in your permanent home. ( )סוכה כ”ח ע”בOn the other hand the  גדרof  מצות לולבis just to hold the )ולקחתם( ארבע מינים. The  הלכהthat the  ארבע מיניםhave to belong to you is just one of the conditions of the מצוה. That is why when a person lends a סוכה, he gives it to the borrower as his (the borrowers) ( דירת קבעpermanent dwelling). Part of a  דירת קבעis the feeling that “this is my home” and for this reason even a borrowed  סוכהis considered כשלו ממש. By contrast when a person lends a לולב, he gives it to the borrower for him to do the נענועים, and unless he specifies that he is giving it as a מתנה על מנת להחזיר, this detail is not included in his default intention.4 For this reason when a person borrows a  לולבon the first day of סוכות, it does not automatically become ( שלוunless it is specified that it is a  )מתנהand he cannot fulfill his obligation with it. f Sukkos – a Chag of Unity It is a common theme in Chassidishe teachings that there are שבעים פנים לתורה,5 and oftentimes we find that a question or  הלכהin  פשטcan be illuminated through insight from רמז,  דרושor סוד. Here too a deeper look at the meaning of these two  מצוותcan shed more light on the issue. It is well known that the central theme of the  מצוותof  סוכותis ( אחדותunity).  סוכהis a  מצוהthat surrounds and encompasses everything and everyone that is inside of it. This is expressed in the  מאמר חז”לbrought earlier כל ישראל ראוים  – לישב בסוכה אחתAll Jews are worthy of sitting together in the same Sukkah. Then we have לולב. Besides for the unity expressed just by the fact that we are binding 4 different species together (א:)או”ח תרנא, we find unity expressed in the  מצוהof the  ארבע מיניםin many other ways as well. First of all there is unity in each of the 4 species chosen for the מצוה.6 The leaves of the  לולבhave 3 The answer, as well as the following explanation, is based on the Lubavitcher Rebbe’s ליקוטי  שיחותvol. 19 page 348. 4 For a similar example see ח,ו: שלחן ערוך הרב אורח חיים ידand יא,ג: משנה ברורה ידregarding a borrowed טלית. 5 13:15 במדבר רבה 6 סידור עם דא”ח רס”ד ע”ד  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 125 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון to be bound together ()סוכה ל”ב ע”א, the  הדסhas to have every three leaves growing together, ( )סוכה ל”ב ע”בthe  ערבהgrows in bunches and is therefore called אחוונא, brotherhood ( )שבת כ ע”אand the  אתרוגlives on its tree from year to year ( )הדר באילנו משנה לשנהunifying within it all four seasons. ()סוכה ל”ה ע”א Then of course we have the unity expressed be bringing all four species together as expressed in the well-known יב:מדרש ויקרא רבה ל: מה אתרוג זה יש בו טעם ויש בו ריח כך ישראל יש בהם בני אדם שיש בהם תורה  מה התמרה הזו יש בו טעם ואין בו ריח כך הם ישראל...ויש בהם מעשים טובים  מה הדס יש בו ריח ואין בו...יש בהם שיש בהם תורה ואין בהם מעשים טובים  מה ערבה זו...טעם כך ישראל יש בהם שיש בהם מעשים טובים ואין בהם תורה אין בה טעם ואין בה ריח כך הם ישראל יש בהם בני אדם שאין בהם לא תורה ולא . אמר הקדוש ברוך הוא יוקשרו כולם אגודה אחת והן מכפרין אלו על אלו...מעשים Just as the esrog has taste and smell so too there are Jews with Torah and good deeds… Just as the date palm has taste but no smell so too there are Jews with Torah and no good deeds… Just as the hadas has smell but no taste so too there are Jews with good deeds and no Torah… Just as the arava has no taste and no smell so too there are Jews without Torah and without good deeds… said Hakadosh Baruch Hu - let them all be bound in one bundle and they will complete each other. Even though at first glance it seems both  מצוותexpress the same  מדהof אחדות, a deeper look will show that they are actually quite different. Two approaches to Unity When trying to unify many people, where each is different from the other,  – אין דעותיהם שוותtheir opinions are not equal, ( )סנהדרין לח ע”אthere are two approaches to overcoming these differences. The first approach is for each individual to negate his own individuality for the sake of a greater goal,7 much like the uniformity found in an army where all of the soldiers put aside their individual wants and needs for the common goal of serving their country. The second approach is for the different individuals to get together, acknowledge their differences and evaluate each other’s strengths and weaknesses so they can work out how each individual can complement the whole so that the whole becomes much bigger than the sum of its parts. This unity is like the harmony displayed by an orchestra where each musician has a different instrument with different qualities which, when combined, 7 See  אין מכבין זה את זה, מיכאל שר של מים וגבריאל שר של אש, עושה שלום במרומיו12:8 במדבר רבה. As explained in 12 תניא אגרת הקודש. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 126 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי produce something much greater than what each could do on its own.8 These two approaches to unity are symbolized by the two  מצוותof סוכה and לולב. The  סוכהenvelops everyone inside. Inside the  סוכהthere are no differences between one Jew and another. We are all celebrating together with הקדוש ברוך הוא. That is like the first form of unity where the individuals are seen as part of one whole. The  מצוהof לולב, on the other hand, shows us how each Jew is important for who he is. The אתרוג, the לולב, the  הדסand even the  ערבהeach have something to contribute, and each one is needed (you cannot fulfill the מצוה with 4  אתרוגיםor with an אתרוג,  לולבand  הדסbut without the )ערבה. This is more like the second form of unity where each individual maintains his individuality and uses his strengths to contribute to the whole. So now we can explain the issue of “ ”לכםin connection to the  מצוותof  סוכהand לולב. In order for both of these  מצוותto be fulfilled, the  לולב/  סוכהhave to belong to the person doing the )”משלכם“( מצוה. The difference between them is that regarding the סוכה, being that we view all Jews as one unit (the first approach to )אחדות, the  סוכהthat belongs to my friend in essence belongs to all Jews because we are all essentially one. So if I use my friend’s  סוכהI am essentially using my own סוכה.9 Regarding the לולב, however, we view each Jew as an individual. An individual who contributes to the whole, but an individual nonetheless. For that reason if the  לולבbelongs to my friend it does NOT belong to me and it does not satisfy the criteria of “”לכם – משלכם. I can therefore not use it unless I receive it as a מתנה.10 Our hopes and prayers are that through strengthening  אחדותamongst  כלל ישראלwe will be  זוכהto fulfill the rest of the  מצוותof  סוכותincluding the ultimate expression of  שמחת החגin the 11 שמחת בית השואבהwhere all the Jews joined together12 in the ultimate  אחדותthat comes through the ultimate שמחה  של מצוהin the בית המקדש השלישי. v 8 In these 2 levels of unity there is no ‘higher level’ and ‘lower level’ rather each level has its advantages and disadvantages. For a more in-depth look see  ליקוטי שיחותVol. 19 page 359. 9 The exception would be regarding a stolen סוכה, where the thief, by the act of stealing, is excluding the original owner from using the סוכה, thereby contradicting the whole theme of  אחדותand rendering the  פסול- סוכה. 10 This also explains why regarding  סוכהthe  תורהuses the word  לךwhich is  לשון יחידwhile for  לולבit uses the word  לכםwhich is לשון רבים. 11  מי שלא ראה שמחת בית השואבה לא ראה שמחה מימיו, סוכה נא ע”א 12  כל העם האנשים והנשים כולן באין לראות ולשמוע- 8:14 עיין רמב”ם הלכות לולב.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 127 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 128 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Brachos on a Minhag Rabbi Shmuel Witkin T $ he  גמראin  סוכהon  דף מד ע”אexplains that the reason for not reciting a  ברכהeach year on the taking of the  ערבותon  הושענא רבהis due to the fact that it is only a מנהג. A  מנהגdoes not require a ברכה. However, we do find many  ברכותon  מצוותwhich are only מנהגים. Let us take the  מצוהof יום  טוב שניfor example. We are well aware of the reason why those of us living outside of  ארץ ישראלmust keep two days for all of the ימים טובים. This practice is based on the  מנהגof our ancestors who kept two days during the times when it was not clear to them when the actual first day of these holidays fell out. Now that we follow a calendar, we are only observing the second day based on מנהג. However, if  מנהגיםdo not warrant ברכות, how can we make any  ברכותon the second day of these ?ימים טובים We must first understand the reasoning for not making a  ברכהon a מנהג. This in truth is a dispute among the ראשונים.f  רש”י סוכה מד ע”א ד”ה מנהגexplains that the word “ ”וצונוof the blessing cannot be recited, since there is no הלכה of  לא תסורattached to these ( מנהגיםsuch as )ערבה. This means that there is no  תורהcommandment to not deviate from adhering to these  מנהגיםset up by חז”ל. The רמב”ם, however, in his opening to the  ספר יד החזקהdisagrees and explains that the  הלכהof  לא תסורdoes apply to all מנהגים. Yet, when the רמב”ם in ז: הלכות חנוכה גcomments on why there is no  ברכהon the recitation of הלל on ראש חודש, he too bases it on the fact that it is also only a מנהג. He explains that since the recitation of  הללon  ראש חודשis not a מצוה, but merely a מנהג, as seen by the fact that certain parts of  הללare omitted, it does not warrant a ברכה.  ברכותwere not established for an act on a “ ”מנהגlevel. Hence we see three actions which are all מנהגים, but yet only  יום טוב שניseems to require a ברכה. Why don’t  רש”יand the ’רמב”םs reasons for not making a  ברכהon a מנהג apply to ?יום טוב שני Let us focus on the the  רמב”םas we try to gain a better understanding. The Brisker Rav on the  רמב”ם הלכות ברכות פרק י”אoffers a very insightful f Rabbi Witkin is the Rav of Khal Bnei HaYeshivos (KBH). He, his wife, and their children have been part of the North Woodmere community for two and a half years.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 129 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון understanding based on a  ד”ה כאן במקדש: תוספות סוכה דף מדwhich explains that the  מצוהof  ערבהis very different than the  מצוהof  יום טוב שניand  הללin that  ערבהis only a “”טלטול-a taking. Why should this make any difference whatsoever regarding reciting a  ברכהon its taking? He explains that there is a fundamental difference between  יום טוב שניand ערבה. All of the actions which we perform on the second day of these holidays are  מצוותbeing that have a foundation. They are the same acts that are performed on the first day of their respective holidays which allows them the status of being considered מצוות. Yes, the reason for doing these acts on the second day is due to a מנהג, yet that does not negate their fundamental status of being acts of מצוה. It all depends on the actions we are doing, and not solely on why we are doing these actions. A  ברכהis warranted only if the act has a “תורת מצוה בהו בעצם החפצא.” It is for this reason that the  רמב”םcan still consider them acts of  מצוהwhich will warrant a ברכה. Yet, when focusing on the act of ערבה, we have no grounds for considering it an act of  מצוהother than the  מנהגwhich was enacted by חז”ל. It is for this reason that  תוספותhas the right to coin it as an act of mere “taking”. He is only trying to contrast it to the acts of  יום טוב שניand  הללwhich do have a basis as acts of  מצוהin the תורה. The litmus test for warranting a  ברכהaccording to the  רמב”םis dependent on whether this action has a basis to be considered an act of ( מצוהsuch as the actions of  מצוהwe perform on )יום טוב שני. However, if these acts these are merely  מנהגיםimplemented by  חז”לwithout any prior basis as acts of מצוה, they will not require a ברכה. As always in understanding תורה, we must not ask why we perform these acts , but what are the nature of the acts being performed. Even though these acts are all being done based on a מנהג, they are integrally different based on their background and nature. The “why” is the same, yet the “what” is so different that one may require a  ברכהwhile the other does not. There is still one unanswered dispute between the  רמב”םand תוספות. The  רמב”םin ז: הלכות חנוכה גwas quoted as being of the opinion that  הללon  ראש חודשdoes not require a ברכה, which is accepted as the  הלכהby Sephardic Jews.  תוספותin  סוכהquoted earlier presents the view of Ashkenazi Jewry who do recite a  ברכהon the recitation of  הללon ראש חודש. If the understanding of the Brisker Rav is correct in that the  רמב”םagrees with the understanding of that same  תוספותin  סוכהwhich makes the recitation of a  ברכהdependent on the nature of the act, why would they not be in agreement regarding the recitation of a  ברכהon  הללof Rosh Chodesh? Does it have a basis, a foundation to be considered a  מצוהor not? In truth, the Brisker Rav himself deals with this issue and explains the dispute is dependent on the next few words of that  תוספותin  סוכהwhich explains that the reason we recite a  ברכהon  הללof ראש OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 130 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי  חודשis because-“..לא גרע מקורא בתורה..” -it is no worse than reading the Torah. What does  תוספותmean by that? We are not making the  ברכהon reading the תורה, but rather the  ברכהon reading  ?הללThe Brisker Rav explains that it is precisely here where the  רמב”םdoes not agree with the view of תוספות. תוספות understands that even if the basis of these words as being a  מצוהare only in regards to the  מצוהof תלמוד תורה, this can warrant a  ברכהeven when being recited as הלל. It has a basis, and that basis is enough to require a ברכת המצוה. Even if the  רמב”םagrees regarding יום טוב שני, that is based on the fact that it is the same act of  מצוהwhich has that  ברכהwhich is now being repeated. However, having a basis as words of  תורהis not considered a valid basis according to the  רמב”םfor warranting a  ברכהas a  מצוהof הלל. In conclusion, according to the  רמב”םevery  מנהגdoes in fact fall under the  איסורof לא תסור. However, requiring a  ברכהis dependent on whether it is to be categorized as an act of  מצוהor merely as a מנהג. We need to ask what is the nature of the act and not merely why are we performing it. If this act is found to have a basis as an act of מצוה, such as the  מצוותperformed on יום טוב שני, it will be categorized as a  מצוהwarranting a ברכה.  הללon  ראש חודשand  ערבהwhich do not have a basis as an act of מצוה, in turn will be categorized solely as  מנהגיםand not מצוות, which will therefore not warrant a ברכה. May we continue to perform all of our  מצוותand  מנהגיםin their proper fashion, and in this  זכותbe  זוכהto the ultimate  ברכהof ובא לציון גואל ונאמר אמן. f f  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 131 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 132 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי From Huts to Heichal: Insights into Sukkot and Shemini Atzeres Michael Oppenheim T $ he  הפטרהfor the second day of  סוכותis from the 8th  פרקof ‘מלכים א, and describes the dedication and celebration that  שלמה המלךled after completing the construction of the בית המקדש. The  הפטרהbegins with the transfer of the  ארוןand the rest of the  כלי קודשfrom the  משכןinto the newly built  בית המקדשaccompanied by the sacrifice of innumerable sheep and cattle. This is followed by ’שלמה המלךs address to  בני ישראלretelling דוד ’המלךs desire to build the  בית המקדשand ’הקב”הs response that it will be built by ’דודs son rather than  דודhimself. The most obvious connection between this narrative and  סוכותis the fact that these events occurred over  ;סוכותthe opening  פסוקof the  הפטרהis ויקהלו אל המלך שלמה כל איש ישראל בירח האיתנים בחג הוא החדש השביעי )ב:(מלאכים א’ ח And the entire nation of Israel gathered to King Shlomo in the month of the strong ones which is the seventh month on the holiday [of ]סוכות. While this certainly provides a connection to סוכות, if one examines the text of the narrative closely, there seems to be an even stronger thematic connection that may inform our understanding of  סוכותand שמיני עצרת. It is important to understand this event in its historic context as recorded in ‘מלכים א. The  ספרopens with the aging of  דוד המלךand his death and transfer Michael Oppenheim is an Infectious Diseases physician at North Shore University Hospital and a healthcare administrator for the North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System. Michael and his wife, Aviva, live across the lake in Woodmere with their three children, Yair, Chaya Sarah, and Akiva. Though too far to walk on a regular basis, Michael affiliated with BKNW in 2011.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 133 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון of the monarchy to שלמה.  דוד המלךhas completed the work of conquering/ securing  ארץ ישראלand establishing מלכות בית דוד. Prior to his death, דוד המלך provides  שלמהwith a list of those who were disloyal to him and to ( שלמהand therefore pose a risk to the monarchy), and instructs  שלמהto address these threats. The  נביאrecounts ’שלמהs execution of his father’s instructions and, once complete, states  – והממלכה נכונה ביד שלמהand the kingdom was solidified in the hands of Shlomo (ב:)מלאכים א’ ג. Two verses later, the text makes a point of noting  – רק העם מזבחים בבמות כי לא נבנה בית לשם ה’ עד הימים ההםbut the people were still sacrificing on personal altars because a house had not been built for the name of God up to that point (ב:)מלאכים א’ ג. This juxtaposition and the use of the word ““( ”רקbut”) suggests that this statement is something of a rebuke to  שלמהor at least is identifying something that is incomplete in his monarchy. The  נביאthen records how  הקב”הappears to  שלמהand asks what he ( )שלמהwould like to receive from הקב”ה. ( שלמה המלךafter noting the large size of the  )בני ישראלasks for wisdom, which he is granted. This is immediately followed by the narrative describing ’שלמהs adjudication of the case of two women each claiming to be mother of the same baby, which causes the nation to recognize and respect ’שלמהs brilliance, and, as a consequence of this, the  נביאstates  – ויהי המלך שלמה מלך על כל ישראלand Shlomo HaMelehch was the ruler over all of Israel (א:)מלאכים א’ ד. After a quick enumeration of ’שלמהs key officers and leaders, the  נביאthen begins the description of the building of the  בית המקדשwhich culminates with the 14 day dedication of the בית המקדש, the beginning of which is described in the  הפטרהread on the second day of סוכות. The linkage between the establishment of the monarchy and the building of the  בית המקדשis articulated in מסכת סנהדרין דף כ ע”ב: d m שלש מצות נצטוו ישראל בכניסתן לארץ להעמיד להם מלך ולהכרית זרעו של עמלק ולבנות בית הבחירה Israel was commanded to perform three Mitzvos upon entering Eretz Yisroel: to establish a monarch, to eliminate the progeny of Amalek, and to build a Bais Hamikdash. If one carefully examines the text of the הפטרה, there is a striking set of 3 textual references / parallels that seem to link the dedication of the בית המקדש to the אבות: 1. The opening of the  הפטרהrefers to the month in which the dedication occurred as “”ירח האיתנים. The  גמראin  ראש השנה יא ע”אstates that  תשריis referred to by this name because it is the birth-month of the אבות, who are the “ – ”איתני עולםthe “strong ones of the world.” This name is not used any other time in  תנ”ךto describe תשרי. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 134 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי 2. When describing the sacrifices brought during the dedication of the בית המקדש, the  נביאstates that they were so numerous – אשר לא יספרו ולא ימנו מרב that they could not be counted or measured because of their large numbers (ה:)מלאכים א’ ח. Interestingly, this same textual construct also appears when  שלמהis describing the large populace of ( בני ישראלjust before requesting wisdom from )הקב”ה:  – עם רב אשר לא ימנה ולא יספר מרבa large nation that cannot be measured or counted because of their large numbers (’מלאכים א ח:)ג. This sentence almost exactly parallels the statement made by יעקב  אבינוabout the promise he received regarding his children: אשר לא יספר מרב – that they will not be counted because of their large numbers (יב:)בראשית לב. Interestingly, the  נביאuses not only the verb  ספרbut also adds the verb מנה, a synonym for counting. This same verb is found in the promise to אברהם  אבינוabout the multitudes that would ultimately descend from him: אשר  – אם יוכל איש למנות את עפר הארץ גם זרעך ימנהonly a person who could count the dust of the earth will be able to count your children (טז:)בראשית יג. Our text – which borrows and fuses these phrases - seems to be connecting our narrative to the promises made to both  אברהםand יעקב. 3.  שלמה המלךrecounts how his father, דוד המלך, wished to build the בית המקדש, but  הקב”הinformed him that his son, rather than he, would be the one to build it. The words used by  שלמה המלךin this  הפטרהto describe what his father was told are  – כי אם בנך היוצא מחלציךrather your son who shall emanate from you (יט:)מלאכים א’ ח. This particular phrase is very conspicuous since those are NOT the words used in the record of the original conversation with דוד המלך. When  נתן הנביאis speaking to דוד המלך, he states והקימתי את זרעך  הוא יבנה בית לשמי....  – אחריך אשר יצא ממעיךI will establish your child after you who emanates from your loins … [and] he will build a house for my name (יג-יב:)שמואל ב’ ז. Note that there are a series of differences between the original statement to  דוד המלךand how  שלמה המלךrecounts it in our הפטרה. First, instead of “”והקימתי את זרעך אחריך אשר יצא,  שלמה המלךstates “כי אם בנך  ;”היוצאthe paraphrase chosen by  שלמה המלךtextually parallels the promise to  אברהם אבינו:  – כי אם אשר יצא ממעיך הוא יירשךrather, the one who emanates from your loins will inherit from you (ד:)בראשית טו. The second change made when  שלמה המלךparaphrases the story is to change “( ”ממעיךused by  )נתן הנביאto “”מחלציך. The word “ ”מחלציךappears in only one other place in תנ”ך. The other text in which it is used describes the nation and kings that will eventually emanate from יעקב אבינו: “גוי וקהל גוים יהיה ממך ומלכים מחלציך  – ”יצאוa nation and collection of nations will come from you, and kings will emanate from you (יא:)בראשית א’ לה. Once again, the text in our הפטרה borrows phrases from the narratives of the ( אבותspecifically  אברהםand v j v v  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 135 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון  ;)יעקבit seems that the text is connecting the event of the inauguration of the  בית המקדשto the promises made to the אבות. What is particularly salient is that the textual parallels seem to be to the promises made to  אברהםand יעקב, and especially to יעקב.  אברהםis, of course, the first person to receive promises from  הקב”הto have a large nation emanate from him. However, both  אברהם אבינוand  יצחק אבינוhad more than one son, creating ambiguity -through which son would these promises manifest.1 יעקב, though, is ultimately revealed to be recipient of those original ברכות. R’ S.R. Hirsch (י: )בראשית כחnotes that  יצחק אבינוblesses  יעקבby saying “ויתן לך את  – ”ברכת אברהםand may he grant you the blessings of Avraham (ד:)בראשית כח identifying  יעקב אבינוas the true heir to the blessings and the founder of the nation . Similarly, the Brisker Rav notes that the statement to  יעקב אבינוin יא: בראשית לה-“ ”גוי וקהל גוים יהיה ממךis meant to assert: v h נאמרה לו הבטחה שמזרעו יצא עם ישראל ועוד הובטח לו “וקהל עמים” דהיינו )טז:שיהיו שבטים מזרעו (חידושי הגרי”ז סימן עח ע”פ בראשית מח A promise was given to him that the nation of Israel will emanate from his children and his children will be the tribes . Additionally, R’ S. R. Hirsch (י: )בראשית כחnotes that  יעקבis the first of the  אבותto identify the concept of a place on earth for the  שכינהto rest: “ויקרא את  – ”שם המקום ההוא בית אלand he called the name of the place the House of God (יט:)בראשית כח. It is not surprising, therefore, that  שלמה המלךinvokes specific parallels to יעקב אבינו. These prominent textual connections to the promises made to אברהם and  יעקבsuggest that  שלמה המלךis not simply celebrating the construction and dedication of the  בית המקדשas an isolated event in its own right. Rather,  שלמהseems to be underscoring this important moment as the culmination and realization of the  ברכותgiven to the אבות:  בני ישראלas nation living in ארץ ( ישראלas promised to the )אבות, with an immeasurable population (אשר לא )יספר מרב = אשר לא יספרו ולא ימנו מרב, and with a  בית המקדשbuilt by a monarch from )ומלכים מחלציך יצאו = בנך היוצא מחלציך( מלכות בית דוד.  שלמהis celebrating the completion of the third commandment to  בני ישראלrequired after their arrival and settling of ארץ ישראל, (“ )”ולבנות בית הבחירהas the final phase in the realization of the promises made to  אברהםand יעקב.2 The completion of the building of the  בית המקדשactually occurred 11 v v v c 1 ו:עיין רמב”ן בראשית יז 2 A similar idea is found in the פסיקתא רבתי, in  פיסקא וon 7:51 ,’מלכים א. The  מדרשsuggests that the name  שלמהis derived from the word “( ”שלםcomplete) since, though building the בית המקדש,  הקב”הcompleted the work of creation through ’שלמהs hands OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 136 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי months prior to the dedication ceremony described in our הפטרה.3 Why did  שלמה המלךwait until the following  סוכותto inaugurate the ?בית המקדש Perhaps this is specifically because of ’שלמהs desire to celebrate the event as the culmination and fulfillment of the promises to the אבות. Consider what the  מצוהof  ישיבה בסוכהis meant to evoke: “למען ידעו דרתיכם כי בסוכות הושבתי את  – בני ישראל בהוציאי אותם מארץ מצריםso that future generations will recall that I provided huts for Bnei Yisrael when I took them out of Egypt” (מג:)ויקרא כג. The cycle of the  מועדיםreflects a historic continuum: ( פסחthe first in the cycle) recalls the exodus from Egypt, followed by  שבועותreflecting the giving of the תורה, and culminating with  סוכותrepresenting the years spent in the desert prior to entering ארץ ישראל.4 In Midrashic literature, the  סוכהitself represents the concept of גלות. The מא: ילקוט שמעוני ויקרא כגstates: אמר רבי אליעזר בר מרוס למה עושין סוכה אחר יום הכפורים לומר לך שכן אתה מוצא בראש השנה יושב הקב”ה בדין על באי העולם וביום הכפורים הוא חותם את הדין שמא יצא דינן של ישראל לגלות ועל ידי כן עושין סוכה וגולין מבתיהן לסוכה והקב”ה מעלה עליהן כאלו גלו לבבל Why does one build the sukkah immediately after Yom Kippur? Since on Rosh Hashanah, God sits in judgment and on Yom Kippurim the judgment is finalized, perhaps the judgment was for Israel to be exiled, so they immediately build the Sukkah and leave their homes into the Sukkah which God credits as though they were exiled to Babylonia. Similarly, the  משכןitself is recognized as a symbol of transiency. A number of commentators note that the name  משכןis derived from the root  שכןbecause it denotes the intrinsic nature of the  משכןas designed for travel with  בני ישראלand use during temporary encampments.5 In his speech to the people during the dedication of the בית המקדש,  שלמה המלךspecifically highlights that the  בית המקדשthat was built is  – מכון לשבתך עולמיםa permanent dwelling for the יב( שכינה:)מלאכים א’ ח. This moment – the dedication of the בית המקדש - reflects the transition from the transitory, migratory nature of the  משכןto the permanence of a בית המקדש. Perhaps  שלמהchose to have this celebration specifically on  – סוכותthe holiday that represents the nomadic nation in the desert - to celebrate the transition of  בני ישראלinto an established people with an established monarch in their own land. What started as promises to the  אבות-  מתן תורה,גלות מצרים, and the travels through the desert symbolized by c c v לח: מלאכים א’ ו3 מג: עיין רשב”ם ויקרא כג4  אחרי מות צד,יח; מלבים-יז: דניאל ד, עיין אלשיך5  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 137 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון the  – סוכהculminates now in this moment with the establishment of the בית  – המקדשthe final of the three  מצותrequired after taking possession of ארץ ישראל. This might also explain the custom of אושפיזין, inviting our forefathers ( אהרן, משה, יוסף, יעקב, יצחק, אברהםand  )דודinto the סוכה. Like ’שלמה המלךs timing of the inauguration, the  אושפיזיןreflect the idea that “כי בסוכות הושבתי את בני מג( ”ישראל בהוציאי אותם מארץ מצרים: )ויקרא כגis not viewed and celebrated only as an isolated historic event but as the last step in the progression that begins with ’אברהם אבינוs receiving the first promise (קום התהלך בארץ לארכה ולרחבה כי לך  –אתננהrise up and travel the length and breadth of the land for it will be given to you (יז: ))בראשית יגand continues through ’בני ישראלs travels in the desert to ultimately taking possession of ( ארץ ישראלsymbolized by )דוד המלך. Perhaps this idea can be extended to suggest a dimension of the somewhat enigmatic שמיני עצרת.  שמיני עצרתis considered an independent holiday (“רגל  )”בפני עצמוbut it has no specific associated historical remembrances or events described in the חמשה חומשי תורה. It is noteworthy that the  הפטרהfor שמיני עצרת is also taken from the narrative describing ’שלמהs celebration of the dedication of the  בית המקדשin the same  פרקin מלכים א. While the  הפטרהfor the second day of  סוכותis from the  פסוקיםdescribing the beginning of the ceremony, the  הפטרהof  שמיני עצרתis taken from the last פסוקים, describing the completion of the ceremony and return of the people to their homes. Perhaps שמיני עצרת is meant to reflect yet another step in the historic progression symbolized by the מועדים:  יציאת מצרים-  מתן תורה ;פסח-  סוכות ;שבועות- travels in the desert.  שמיני עצרתcelebrates the final stage: the actual establishment of  עם ישראלin ארץ ישראל. It has no special  מצוותbecause it is not celebrating a specific timelimited historic event, but rather celebrates the new “life as usual” for עם  ישראלin ארץ ישראל. This idea may also elucidate a puzzling  פסוקin the  הפטרהof שמיני עצרת. The  פסוקstates  – ביום השמיני שלח את העםon the eighth day he [Shlomo HaMelech] sent the people home (סו:)מלאכים א’ ח. The  מצודת דודcomments that the people did not actually leave on the 8th day since it was  שמיני עצרתand they could not leave on that day. Rather, they received permission to return home on  שמיני עצרתbut did not actually leave until the next day after again obtaining permission.6 Why does the  נביאrecord this mention of granting permission to leave on  שמיני עצרתif the people could not leave then? Perhaps this “sending of the people home” on  שמיני עצרתat the end of the celebration is meant to symbolize this idea of  שמיני עצרתas the celebration of  עם ישראלin  ארץ ישראלfor who the wandering in the desert and the use of a  משכןis a thing of the past. v:”:”: c 6 סו:מצודת דוד מלכים א ח. The second request for permission is recorded in דברי הימים. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 138 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי “ שלמה המלךsends the people home” not only in the literal sense but – on שמיני  עצרת- symbolically identifying that the nation has just entered a new phase of existence in a permanent national “home” to which  שלמהsends them. Perhaps this can also shed light on the  קריאת התורהfor שמיני עצרת. On the last day of  פסחand ( שבועותoutside of  )ארץ ישראלthe section related to the  מועדיםfrom the end of  )”כל הבכור“( פרשת ראהis read. When the day falls on שבת, we begin the reading earlier in the ( פרשהbeginning with “ )”עשר תעשרin order to have sufficient number of  פסוקיםfor the 2 extra עליות. On  שמיני עצרתthough, we begin reading from  עשר תעשרregardless of the day of the week. The classic explanation is that there are many  מצוותrelevant to agriculture and produce in those extra sections that are read, and since  סוכותis also חג האסיף, the time of gathering in the crops, those  הלכותare relevant.7 Reformulating this idea slightly differently, the extra sections which are read include numerous  מצוות( מצוות תלויות בארץtied to the land of )ארץ ישראל, including שמיטה, מעשר, and others. If  שמיני עצרתis a reflection of  עם ישראלin ארץ ישראל, it is certainly understandable why those sections would be added on שמיני עצרת. It is interesting that these two  הפטרותare read only in חוץ לארץ.8 Perhaps these are chosen for reading in  חוץ לארץspecifically because those in  גלותneed to memorialize or express the idea of  עם ישראלin  ארץ ישראלmore than the בני ארץ ישראל. May we all be  זוכהto see the re-instatement of  מלכות בית דודand the experience of all of  עם ישראלin ארץ ישראל, במהרה בימינו. c m m 7  מגילה יא ע”א,עיין ר”ן על הרי”ף 8 In ארץ ישראל, the second day of  סוכותis  חול המועדand no  הפטרהis read;  שמיני עצרתand שמחת  תורהare celebrated on the same day and the  הפטרהfor  שמחת תורהis read.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 139 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון שמיני עצרת $ תשרי תשע"ה • TISHREI 5775 Z 140 Y אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON Shemini Atzeres: One Nation, One Land Ephraim Friedman $ T  והקרבתם עלה אשה ריח:ביום השמיני עצרת תהיה לכם כל מלאכת עבדה לא תעשו )לו- לה: (במדבר כט.ניחח לה’ פר אחד איל אחד כבשים בני שנה שבעה תמימם The eighth day shall be a time of restriction for you; you shall not perform any mundane work. You shall offer up a burnt offering, a fire offering for a spirit of satisfaction to the Lord: one bull, one ram, and seven lambs in the first year, [all] unblemished. (Bamidbar 29:35-36) here is a tendency to regard שמיני עצרת, as nothing more than an extension and continuation of the  יום טובof סוכות. Among other reasons, this is perhaps because the  תורהitself refers to שמיני עצרת as “the eighth day,” juxtaposed to the seven day observance of  סוכותwhich immediately precedes it. However, upon closer examination, it is clear that  שמיני עצרתis a holiday in its own right, separate and apart from סוכות. As we know, on  שמיני עצרתwe do not take the ארבע מינים, nor do we recite הושענות, and for those who have the custom to sit in a סוכה, they do so without a ברכה. Most tellingly, in our  תפילותwe refer to the day not as “”חג הסוכות, but rather as “שמיני ”חג העצרת, and the  גמרא סוכה מז ע”בconcludes that a new  ברכהof  שהחיינוis to be recited when making קידוש.1 While all of the other  ימים טוביםare rooted in the commemoration or celebration of a specific historical event or miracle,  שמיני עצרתseems to be unique, in that it appears to be nothing more than an additional day on which we are required to abstain from מלאכה, with no apparent historical correlation and lacking any discernible ( מצות היוםother 1 The  גמרא סוכה מח ע”אidentifies six major differences between  סוכותand שמיני עצרת, which are represented by the mnemonic “”פזר קשב. The specific details of these differences are beyond the scope of this article. Ephraim Friedman practices real estate law at the law firm of Herrick, Feinstein LLP in Manhattan. Ephraim and his wife, Ilana, and their children, Daphna, Leora, Dena and Shmuel moved to North Woodmere and joined BKNW in July, 2005.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 141 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון than, perhaps, )תפילת גשם. Noting the stark contrast between the sacrifices brought throughout the holiday of  סוכותand those offered on שמיני עצרת,  רש”יbegins to give us some insight regarding the significance of the day : , ולשון חבה הוא זה. התעכבו לי מעט עוד, אלו כנגד ישראל:פר אחד איל אחד .כבנים הנפטרים מאביהם והוא אומר להם קשה עלי פרידתכם עכבו עוד יום אחד )לו:(רש”י במדבר כט One bull, one ram: These correspond to Israel. [G-d said,] “Remain with Me a little longer.” It expresses [His] affection [for Israel]. It is like children taking leave of their father, who says to them, ‘It is difficult for me to part with you; stay one more day.’ (Rashi Bamidbar 29:36)  רש”יcontinues by referring to the following parable: -  פר יחידי למה. כנגד שבעים אומות- אמר רבי אלעזר הני שבעים פרים כנגד מי  ליום. עשו לי סעודה גדולה: משל למלך בשר ודם שאמר לעבדיו.כנגד אומה יחידה ) (סוכה נה ע”ב. כדי שאהנה ממך, עשה לי סעודה קטנה:אחרון אמר לאוהבו R’ Elazar said: to what do these seventy bulls correspond? They correspond to the seventy nations of the world. And the single bull of Shemini Atzeres, why is it brought? It corresponds to the single nation of Israel. This can be compared to a king who said to his servants: “Prepare for me a great banquet.” When it came to the final day of the banquet, he said to his beloved companion, “Prepare for me a small meal so I may enjoy your company.” (Sukka 55b) The  ילקוט שמעוניexpands on the above theme of a private celebration between  השםand  כלל ישראלand records the following similar teaching : אמר רבי אלכסנדרי משל למלך שבאת לו שמחה כל שבעת ימי המשתה היה  וכיון שיצאו שבעת ימי המשתה אמר המלך,בנו של מלך טורח עם האורחים לבנו יודע אני שכל שבעת ימי המשתה היית טורח עם האורחים עכשיו אני  אמר הקב”ה לישראל עכשיו...ואתה נשמח יום אחד ואיני מטריח עליך הרבה  וכיון,אני ואתם נשמח יחד ואיני מטריח עליכם הרבה אלא פר אחד ואיל אחד ששמעו ישראל כך התחילו מקלסין להקב”ה ואומרים זה היום עשה ה’ נגילה ) (ילקוט שמעוני פר’ פנחס תשעב.ונשמחה בו R’ Alecsandri said: This can be compared to a king who celebrated seven days of feasting and throughout these seven days, his son was busy tending to the guests. After the conclusion of the seven days of feasting, the King said to his son, I recognize OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 142 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי that for the past seven days you have been busy making arrangements for our guests, now you and I will celebrate together (alone) for one day and I will not ask much of you… Similarly, Hashem says to Klal Yisrael, “Now you and I, let us celebrate together, and I will not ask much of you. Therefore, bring just one bull and one ram.” When Klal Yisrael heard this, they began to sing praise to Hashem, and said ‘This is the day which Hashem has made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.’ (Yalkut Shimoni Pinchas 782) Because the Hebrew calendar begins with the month of תשרי, we often think of  ראש השנהas the first of our annual ימים טובים. סוכות, therefore, which follows on the heels of  ראש השנהand יום כיפור, is consequently viewed as the end of this first “phase” of Jewish holidays, following which, we endure a long break until ( פסחnotwithstanding the holidays of  חנוכהand  פוריםin between), and then finally conclude the year with  שבועותseven weeks later. Of course, however, we know that in reality this is not so. We begin the  שלש רגליםwith פסח, continue with  שבועותand culminate the yearly progression with the  יום טובof סוכות.2 Accordingly,  שמיני עצרתdoes not represent the middle, but instead marks the very end of the holiday cycle and is, therefore, the very last of the days on which we have a special opportunity to spend celebrating with ‘ה. Chag Yerushas Ha’aretz The ווילנא גאון, in his commentary to שיר השירים, offers a beautiful insight into the first four פסוקים, which provides new meaning and depth to the essence of the day of שמיני עצרת.3  לריח: ישקני מנשיקות פיהו כי טובים דדיך מיין:שיר השירים אשר לשלמה  משכני אחריך נרוצה הביאני:שמניך טובים שמן תורק שמך על כן עלמות אהבוך .המלך חדריו נגילה ונשמחה בך נזכירה דדיך מיין מישרים אהבוך The  ווילנא גאוןexplains these verses in the following manner:  הראשון נגד יציאת.וארבעה פסוקים אלו הם נגד ארבעה זמנים שהיו לישראל מצרים שבאותו לילה שרו שירה כמו שנאמר (ישעיה ל כט) השיר יהיה לכם  ופסוק השלישי הוא נגד בנין. ופסוק שני נגד מתן תורה כנ”ל.כליל התקדש חג  ופסוק רביעי.המשכן שהקריבו שבעים פרים נגד העובדי כוכבים ומזלות כנ”ל .הוא נגד ביאת הארץ שאז נשלם הכל  והשני נגד שבועות.וגם הם נגד ארבעה רגלים האחד נגד פסח שאמרו שירה 2 טז:טז ודברים טז-יד:עיין שמות כג 3 See ודברת בם, Volume 4 page 47, by Rav Yaakov Yehudah Zilberlicht and Rav Aviad Tropp for this source and the preceding sources referenced in this Article.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 143 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון  והשלישי הוא נגד סוכות שהוא זכר להיקף ענני כבוד שהיה.שהוא מתן תורה  והרביעי משכני אחריך הוא נגד שמיני עצרת שהוא...תלוי בבנין המשכן כידוע )ד: (ביאור הגר”א לשיר השירים א.לישראל לבדו These four pesukim correspond to four events experienced by Klal Yisrael: The first refers to the exodus from Egypt, for on that night they sang songs of praise; The second passuk relates to the giving of the Torah, as explained above [the two “kisses” refer to the first two commandments that were expressed directly from Hashem]; The third passuk relates to the building of the Mishkan, where the seventy bulls were offered on behalf of the nations of the world;4 and the fourth passuk corresponds to the Bnei Yisrael’s entry to the land of Israel, for then everything was complete. These four Pesukim also correspond to the four holidays: the first, to Pesach, the day on which they sang shira; the second, to Shavuos, the day on which we received the Torah; the third, to Sukkos, which reminds us of the clouds of glory that surrounded Bnei Yisrael and returned [following the Chet Haegel] when the Mishkan was built; and the fourth, to Shemini Atzeres, which was the day set aside specifically for Klal Yisrael. (Biur HaGra Shir HaShirim 1:4) The  גר”אsees in the words of the fourth  פסוקof  שיר השיריםa unique and intrinsic connection between the  יום טובof  שמיני עצרתand the Jewish people’s inheritance and possession of the land of Israel.5 Similarly, Rav Ben-Tzion Ferrer, in his essay חג ירושת הארץ,6 writes that  שמיני עצרתis זכר לכיבוש הארץ, the time to recall the conquest of ארץ ישראל. Rav Ferrer wonders why the  תרגום יונתן בן עוזיאלtranslates the  פסוקwe began with: “ ”ביום השמיני עצרת תהיה לכםas follows:“ביומא תמינאה כנישין תהוון בחדוא מן מטילכון לבתיכון,” “On the eighth day you shall gather in joy and leave your sukkah and return to your home.” We are well aware of the Torah’s directive to feel a great sense of joy while sitting in the  סוכהand experiencing the  יום טובof סוכות. What, however, is the joy we are supposed to feel when leaving the  סוכהand returning to our homes? Rav Ferrer explains that, whereas on the  יום טובof  סוכותwe thank ‘ הfor His protection as we wandered for forty years through 4 ibid. (1:3). The  גר”אexplains that the reference in the  פסוקto ““( ”שמניךyour oils”) relates to the three types of oil that were used in the  – משכןthe ( שמן המאורthe oil for the )מנורה, the שמן ( המשכהthe oil of anointing) and the ( שמן המנחותthe oil used in the meal offerings). 5 Interestingly, perhaps there is a connection here to the ילקוט, which references a similar phrase “ ”נגילה ונשמחה בוfrom 118:24 תהילים, when referring to the  יום טובof שמיני עצרת. 6  שמיני עצרת,ליום חגינו, Essay 1 (page 78). OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 144 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי the desert, on  שמיני עצרתwe celebrate the point at which we were finally able to stop traveling and build permanent homes in ארץ ישראל.  שמיני עצרתis the time when we no longer need to dwell in temporary huts, and can instead rejoice in the knowledge and comfort that we have reached our destination, with השם, in the land that He has promised to us. Toras Eretz Yisrael The  ווילנא גאוןprovides an additional insight relating to the words of the fourth  פסוקin  שיר השיריםquoted above, “”הביאני המלך חדריו,“The king brought me to His chambers.” He explains:  וענין חדריו הם חדרי התורה כי עיקר התורה הוא.הוא מועד ביאתן לארץ ישראל ) (ביאור הגר”א שם.בארץ ישראל This refers to the time when Bnei Yisrael enters the land of Israel, and the words “His Chambers” refer to the chambers of Torah study, for the essence of Torah is in the land of Israel. (Biur HaGra ibid.) The  ווילנא גאוןclarifies that our ultimate goal is not simply to settle and live in the land of Israel, but rather to establish the land as a place of תורה study. Rav Ferrer suggests a similar idea in the later portions of his essay, חג ירושת הארץ. He notes that the Rabbis saw it appropriate to integrate the celebration of  שמחת תורהinto the holiday of  שמיני עצרתbecause of the inherent connection between the last of the  יומים טוביםand the study of תורה. He argues that  בני ישראלdid not endure generations of hardship - beginning with their suffering in Egypt, then wandering for forty years in the desert, and finally entering  ארץ ישראלonly to spend the first many years fighting wars to conquer the territory and drive out the inhabitants - simply to establish a free society in a new land. Rather, he explains, the objective of the entire journey to ארץ ( ישראלand the justification for all of the trials and tribulations experienced by  בני ישראלalong the way) was the creation of a permanent place of  תורהin this world.7 8 Interestingly, there is a dispute between the  תלמוד בבליand the תלמוד  ירושלמיas to when the  מצוהof הקהל, the gathering of the entire nation every seven years to hear the reading of the  תורהby the king of Israel (יב-י:)דברים לא, 7 Rav Ferrer further notes the connection between the seven  הקפותthat we dance around the  תורהon שמחת תורה/ שמיני עצרתand the seven times that  יהושעcircled around יריחו, which was the first of many battles fought to seize  ארץ ישראלfrom our enemies. 8 This idea is expressed throughout תנ”ך, particularly in the beginning of ספר דברים, as well as by  דוד המלךin ( ספר תהילים105: 44-45): ויתן להם ארצות גוים ועמל לאמים יירשו מה בעבור ישמרו חקיו ותורתיו  ינצרו הללו יה- “And He gave them lands of nations, and they inherited the toil of kingdoms; In order that they keep His statutes and observe His laws.” d  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 145 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון was to be performed. The ח: משנה סוטה זexplains that this ceremony would take place “at the conclusion of the first day of the festival [of Sukkos], in the eighth [year of the Shemitah cycle], i.e., the end of the seventh [year]”. The תלמוד ירושלמי, however, records the same משנה, but states that the ceremony of  הקהלshould be performed on the night following שמיני עצרת.9 This position is further supported by the commentary of  רש”יto the  משנהin מגילה ה ע”א.10 Although in practice  הקהלwas performed following the first days of סוכות, and not as recorded in the ירושלמי, the connection between the  יום טובof שמיני  עצרתand the study of ( תורהin  ארץ ישראלin particular) cannot be overlooked. Kudsha Brich Hu, Orayta V’Yisrael Kulah Chad The  זהר הקדשstates that “God, the Torah and Israel are One.” Our literature is filled with countless sources that highlight and emphasize the eternal and unbreakable bond between Torah,  ארץ ישראלand עם ישראל. Regarding Hashem’s love for  עם ישראלand ארץ ישראל, the מדרש תנחומא writes:  אתה מוצא כשברא העולם חלק,“חביבה ארץ ישראל שבחר בה הקב”ה  מניין? שכן משה אמר בהנחל עליון,הארצות לשרי האומות ובחר בארץ ישראל  ובחר לחלקו ישראל שנאמר כי חלק ה’ עמו יעקב חבל,)גוים וגו’ (דברים כב  אמר הקב”ה יבואו ישראל שבאו לחלקי וינחלו את,)נחלתו (שם דברים לב )הארץ שבאה לחלקי” (פר’ ראה סימן ח The Land of Israel is beloved since He chose it. You find that when Hashem created the world He distributed the various lands to the heavenly ministers and chose the Land of Israel for Himself. How do we know this? Moshe said, When the Supreme One apportioned to the nations their inheritance, when He separated the children of man, He set the boundaries of the people according to the number of the Children of Israel (Devarim 32:8). He also chose the people of Israel as His portion, as it is written, For the Lord’s portion is His people; Yaakov is the lot of His inheritance (ibid. 32:9). Said the Holy One Blessed be He: “Let Israel, who became My portion, inherit the Land which became My portion.” (Parshat Re’eh, Siman 8) Similarly, the  מדרשrelates: ...  למה? שאני תרתי אותה.אמר הקב”ה חביבה עלי ארץ ישראל יותר מן הכל 9 The ( תלמוד ירושלמי7:8  )סוטהquotes the  משנהfound in the  תלמוד בבליverbatim, with the exception of one word - changing “ ”מוצאי יום טוב הראשון של חגto “”מוצאי יום טוב האחרון של חג. 10 . וכן הקהל את העם שהיה בשנה ראשונה של שמטה שהיה במוצאי יום טוב האחרון של חג-”עיין פירוש רש”י ל“וחגיגה OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 146 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי  א”ל הקב”ה למשה הן הארץ חביבה עלי שנאמר.להודיעך שאין חביבה כא”י (דברים יא) ארץ אשר ה’ אלהיך דורש אותה תמיד וישראל חביבין עלי שנאמר  אמר הקב”ה אני אכניס את ישראל שהן.(שם דברים ז) כי מאהבת ה’ אתכם  (במדבר.חביבין עלי לארץ שחביבה עלי שנאמר כי אתם באים אל ארץ כנען )ז:רבה כג The Holy One Blessed be He said: “Eretz Yisrael is more beloved to Me than anything. Why? Because I spied it out...” This teaches that there is no love like the love for Eretz Yisrael. The Holy One Blessed be He said to Moshe: “The Land is beloved to Me, as it says, A Land that the Lord your G-d constantly seeks out (Devarim 11:12); and the people of Israel are beloved to Me, as it says, Rather, because of the Lord’s love for you (ibid. 7:8). The Holy One Blessed be He said: “I will bring the people of Israel, who are beloved to Me, into Eretz Israel, which is beloved to Me,” as it says, When you come into the Land of Canaan (Bamidbar 34:2).” (Bamidbar Rabba 23:7) The אור החיים, in his commentary on the words “”וכי תבואו אל הארץ, “When you come to the Land [and you plant any food tree],” (כג:)פרשת קדושים יט, stresses the importance of establishing a foundation of  תורהin ארץ ישראל: ויצו ה’ שתהיה עיקר הכנסת הארץ לנטוע בה עץ מאכל שהם בני תורה כי אוירה  ונקרא בן תורה עץ מאכל כי,)של ארץ ישראל מחכים ומטהר הנפש (ב”ב קנח ב .ממנו מזון לנפש Hashem ordered that the main aspect of entering Eretz Israel would be to plant there fruit producing trees who are the students of the Torah, for the land of Eretz Israel gives wisdom to and purifies the soul (Baba Basra 158). And a Torah student is called a fruit producing tree, for from him comes the food for the soul. Similarly, the חפץ חיים על התורה, commenting on the ”ארץ זבת חלב ודבש“ פסוק – “A land of milk and honey” (טו:)פר’ בא יג, offers a profound perspective on the relationship between  תורהand ארץ ישראל: The  תורהand  ארץ ישראלare two things that  השםacquired in His world. Their connection to each other is like the connection between the soul (the soul is the  )תורהand the body (the body is )ארץ ישראל. The soul cannot exist on its own; it needs a body. The body itself is just dust of the earth, and needs the soul… The soul of the Jewish people is the תורה, and its body is the land of Israel. Certainly the soul cannot survive without a  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 147 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון body, and the commandments that are dependent on the land cannot be fulfilled without  ארץ ישראל…ארץ ישראלwithout תורה is nothing but a piece of land, a body without a soul, and they are only worthwhile when they are together. With this understanding, the simple translation of the words in שיר השירים, highlighted earlier by the ווילנא גאון, ““ ”הביאני המלך חדריוThe king brought me to His chambers”, may provide yet another reference to the special character of the  יום טובof שמיני עצרת. As explained above, it is on this day that ‘ הsummons us to remain with Him for one additional day. This might then be the explanation for one of the peculiar characteristics of  שמיני עצרתnoted above. Perhaps the reason that there are no distinctive  מצוותto be performed on this day is precisely because on  שמיני עצרתwe are not to be concerned with, or even distracted by, rituals or other external stimuli, such as sitting in a סוכה or shaking the ( לולבor offering numerous )קרבנות. Instead, ‘ הsimply asks that we spend one more day with Him (“in His chambers”), focusing solely and exclusively on the study and celebration of the תורה. It is no wonder then that the teaching of the  ילקוט שמעוניreferenced earlier, concludes with the following statement, which immediately follows the above-quoted passage:  בא שלמה,אמר ר’ אבין אין אנו יודעין במה לשמוח אם ביום אם בהקב”ה . בך בישועתך, בך בתורתך,ופירש נגילה ונשמחה בך Rabbi Avin said: We would not know how to rejoice [on שמיני  ]עצרת- whether “bo” means “in it, referring to the day” or “in Him, referring to G-d.” Shlomo HaMelech came later and clarified (from Shir HaShirim 1:4), “We will delight and rejoice in You” – in Your Torah, in Your salvation. L’olam Lo Eshkach Pikudecha The ח: בעל הטורים פרשת וארא וcomments on the words “ונתתי אתה לכם מורשה אני “ ”השםand I will give it to you as a heritage; I am Hashem”, that the word “ ”מורשהappears only twice in the  תורה- once above, with respect to ארץ ישראל, and again in ד:וזאת הברכה לג, in reference to the תורה, as the  פסוקstates: “תורה צוה “ ”לנו משה מורשה קהלת יעקבThe Torah that Moshe commanded us is a legacy for the congregation of Jacob”. He comments: ““ ”שבזכות התורה ירשו הארץin the merit of the Torah will the land be inherited,” and further notes the unusual use of the term “‘( ”מורשהheritage’), as opposed to the more common term “”ירושה OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 148 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי (‘inheritance’). Some explain11 that while a “ ”ירושהis effortless and permits the inheritor to simply acquire that which is being passed down without any work or struggle, a “מורשה,” on the other hand, once given over, requires significant effort to preserve and maintain. We know this to be true of Klal Yisrael’s relationship with both the תורה and ארץ ישראל. For example, the  גמראin  מגילה ו ע”בteaches, “לא יגעתי ומצאתי  ”אל תאמן- don’t believe one who claims to have succeeded [in  תורהstudy] without exerting any effort. Similarly, concerning ארץ ישראל, we find examples throughout  תנ”ךof warnings conveyed to the Jewish people of the dire consequences that Israel will face should it forsake the  תורהand the will of ‘ה. We need look no further than the terrible curses of the  תוכחהcontained in  פרשת כי תבואor the words of caution continuously repeated by משה רבינו throughout the first few  פרשיותof ( ספר דבריםincluding the words of the second paragraph of the שמע,12 which we recite each morning and evening), to remind ourselves that living peacefully and securely in the land of Israel is conditioned upon, and subject to, our fulfillment of Hashem’s מצוות. Throughout all of ספר תהילים, there are only three times that  דוד המלךuses the language of “ ”אשכחin his prayers, demonstrating his personal desire not to forget something.13 Two of these references are mentioned in respect to ( תורהand  )מצוותand the third, relates to ארץ ישראל: )טז:בחקתיך אשתעשע לא אשכח דברך (תהילים קיט With Your statutes I shall occupy myself; I shall not forget Your speech. )צג:לעולם לא אשכח פקודיך כי בם חייתני (תהילים קיט I shall never forget Your precepts for through them You have sustained me. )ה:אם אשכחך ירושלם תשכח ימיני (תהילים קלז If I forget you, O Jerusalem, may my right hand forget [its skill]. 11 See, for example, the ב: תלמוד ירושלמי בבא בתרא ח- א”ר הושעיה כל מקום שנאמר מורשה לשון דיהא  מן דו לעי היא משכח כולה.“ התיבון והכתיב מורשה קהלת יעקב אמר לית דיהא סוגין מיניהR. Hoshia said: Everywhere that it says morasha it has the connotation of uncertainty. They asked: But doesn’t it say, “the heritage of the Congregation of Yaakov?” He answered: There is nothing weaker (more tenuous) than that [when a person first begins to learn], but after he toils in it, he understands it.” 12  …השמרו לכם פן יפתה לבבכם וסרתם- כא-יג:פרשת עקב יא. 13 Words consisting of the root “ ”שכחare found in many places throughout  תהיליםbut it is disproportionately used in relation to תורה. See, for example, ( תהילים119: 61, 83, 109, 141, 153 and 176).  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 149 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון As we write these articles and prepare this ספר,  לעילוי נשמתNaftali, Eyal and Gilad and the many soldiers of the Israeli Defense Forces who selflessly and heroically gave their lives fighting to protect the State of Israel, rockets continue to rain down on כלל ישראל, indiscriminately targeting the people of Israel, and our brothers and sisters in the IDF continue to risk their lives to defend the Jewish nation. Although the identity of our enemies may change from time to time, their purpose always remains the same - in addition to trying to physically harm as many Jews as possible, their primary objective is to force us out of our land and sever the ties between  עם ישראלand ארץ ישראל. We must always remember that the two things in this world that separate us from the other nations and eternally unite us in our relationship with the  רבונו של עולםare the  תורהand the Land of Israel. We pray for the speedy fulfillment of the prophesy of יחזקאל הנביא, describing the final redemption, when  כלל ישראלwill return to  ארץ ישראלand live there safely and permanently:14 .ואת רוחי אתן בקרבכם ועשיתי את אשר בחקי תלכו ומשפטי תשמרו ועשיתם וישבתם בארץ אשר נתתי לאבותיכם והייתם לי לעם ואנכי אהיה לכם לאלהים And I will put My spirit within you and bring it about that you will walk in My statutes and you will keep My ordinances and do [them]. Then will you dwell in the land that I gave your fathers, and you will be a people to Me, and I will be to you as a God. 14 כח-כז:יחזקאל לו. Chapter 36:16-38 is read as the  הפטרהfor  פרשת פרהand describes how Hashem will purify the Jewish people (“…”וזרקתי עליכם מים טהורים וטהרתם, “And I will sprinkle clean water upon you, and you will be clean…”)(36:25), and bring them back to ארץ ישראל with the coming of משיח. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 150 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Is this Article Permitted in Ohr HaTzafon? Shemini Atzeres as a Separate Holiday or the Eighth Day of Sukkos Michael Gewirtz T $ he  ירושלמיrecords a dispute between  ר’ יוחנןand  ר’ יאשיהwhether the semantics of a vow follows the vernacular of the  תורהor the colloquial speech of man.  אמר רבי יאשיה הלכו בנדרים.אמר ר’ יוחנן הלכו בנדרים אחר לשון בני אדם ’ על דעתיה דר. מה נפיק מן ביניהון? קונם יין שאיני טועם בחג.אחר לשון תורה )א: (ירושלמי נדרים ו. על דעתיה דר’ יאשיה מותר.יוחנן אסור ביום טוב האחרון R’ Yochanan said concerning vows we follow the language of man. R’ Yoshia said concerning vows we follow the language of the תורה. What is the difference between them? One who takes a vow not to taste wine on the Chag. According to the logic of R’ Yochanan it is prohibited on the last day of the holiday, [while] according to the logic of R’ Yoshia it is permitted. (Yerushalmi Nedarim 6:1) The  נפקא מינהgiven by the  גמראconcerns an individual who takes a נדר that he will not taste wine “בחג.” According to ר’ יאשיה, who says a  נדרfollows “לשון התורה,” he would be permitted to drink wine on שמיני עצרת.1 ר’ יוחנן, who says we follow “לשון בני אדם,” would not allow one to drink wine, as people commonly include  שמיני עצרתinto the term חג. The editors of this journal when seeking contributors to the inaugural 1 Implying that biblically speaking,  שמיני עצרתis not considered as part of סוכות. Michael Gewirtz is a corporate loan adjudicator at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. Michael and Lauren, and their children Menachem, Hannah, and Daniella joined BKNW in 2005.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 151 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון volume of Ohr HaTzafon cast a wide net and sought to attract contributors to “a compilation of  דברי תורהon the  יום טובseason of  אלולthrough סוכות.”2 While over the course of this article we will explore how connected  סוכותand שמיני  עצרתare, we will assume for now that we follow  ר’ יוחנןand that although the editors chose the words “through  ”סוכותthey meant to include שמיני עצרת. Shemini Atzeres in the Torah The 3 תורהsets out the different aspects of the  חגיםin three primary places. First, in  פרשת אמרwe find the following description of שמיני עצרת. (לד) דבר אל בני ישראל לאמר בחמשה עשר יום לחדש השביעי הזה חג הסכות : (לה) ביום הראשון מקרא קדש כל מלאכת עבדה לא תעשו:’שבעת ימים לה (לו) שבעת ימים תקריבו אשה לה’ ביום השמיני מקרא קדש יהיה לכם והקרבתם  (לז) אלה מועדי ה’ אשר:אשה לה’ עצרת הוא כל מלאכת עבדה לא תעשו תקראו אתם מקראי קדש להקריב אשה לה’ עלה ומנחה זבח ונסכים דבר יום  (לח) מלבד שבתת ה’ ומלבד מתנותיכם ומלבד כל נדריכם ומלבד כל:ביומו  (לט) אך בחמשה עשר יום לחדש השביעי באספכם:’נדבתיכם אשר תתנו לה את תבואת הארץ תחגו את חג ה’ שבעת ימים ביום הראשון שבתון וביום ) (ויקרא פרק כג:השמיני שבתון (34) Speak unto the children of Israel, saying: On the fifteenth day of this seventh month is the feast of tabernacles for seven days unto the Lord. (35) On the first day shall be a holy convocation; you shall do no manner of servile work. (36) Seven days you shall bring an offering made by fire unto the Lord; on the eighth day shall be a holy convocation unto you; and you shall bring an offering made by fire unto the Lord; it is a day of solemn assembly; you shall do no manner of servile work. (37) These are the appointed seasons of the Lord, which you shall proclaim to be holy convocations, to bring an offering made by fire unto the Lord, a burnt-offering, and a mealoffering, a sacrifice, and drink-offerings, each on its own day; (38) beside the Sabbaths of the Lord, and beside your gifts, and beside all your vows, and beside all your freewill-offerings, which you give unto the Lord. (39) Howbeit on the fifteenth day of the seventh month, when you have gathered in the fruits of the land, you shall keep the feast of the Lord seven days; on the first day shall be a solemn rest, and on the eighth day shall be a solemn rest. (Vayikra 23) 2 Ohr HaTzafon Welcome Letter – 7/17/14 3 See also the description of  שמיני עצרתin יח: נחמיה חand ט-ח:דברי הימים ב’ ז OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 152 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי While on the one hand verse 34 refers to “ ”חג הסוכותas a seven day feast we also find that there is a יום השמיני, an eighth day, which implies that it is part of the seven preceding days. Nowhere is this ambivalence more pronounced than in verse 39. We find at the beginning of the  פסוקthat there is a “”חג להשם for seven days; however, we also find symmetry between the first and eighth day as both are referred to as “ ”שבתוןat the conclusion of the פסוק. Similarly, we find in  פרשת פנחתthe details of the offerings for  סוכותand שמיני עצרת. Once again while calling it the eighth day,4 the descending pattern of  קרבנותthat occur for the seven preceding days are no longer followed. In fact, the number of bulls, rams, lambs and goats sacrificed on שמיני עצרת match the offerings for  ראש השנהand יום כיפור.  (לו) והקרבתם:(לה) ביום השמיני עצרת תהיה לכם כל מלאכת עבדה לא תעשו :עלה אשה ריח ניחח לה’ פר אחד איל אחד כבשים בני שנה שבעה תמימם )(במדבר פרק כט 35 On the eighth day you shall have a solemn assembly: you shall do no manner of servile work; 36 but you shall present a burnt-offering, an offering made by fire, of a sweet savor unto the Lord: one bullock, one ram, seven he-lambs of the first year without blemish; (Bamidbar 29) Finally, in פרשת ראה, the  תורהlist different aspects of the three festivals for which we are required to be עולה לרגל, and  שמיני עצרתis missing completely from the chapter:  (יד) ושמחת בחגך:(יג) חג הסכת תעשה לך שבעת ימים באספך מגרנך ומיקבך :אתה ובנך ובתך ועבדך ואמתך והלוי והגר והיתום והאלמנה אשר בשעריך (טו) שבעת ימים תחג לה’ אלהיך במקום אשר יבחר ה’ כי יברכך ה’ אלהיך  (טז) שלוש פעמים בשנה יראה:בכל תבואתך ובכל מעשה ידיך והיית אך שמח כל זכורך את פני ה’ אלהיך במקום אשר יבחר בחג המצות ובחג השבעות ובחג ) (דברים פרק טז:הסכות ולא יראה את פני ה’ ריקם (13) You shall keep the feast of tabernacles seven days, after you have gathered in from your threshing-floor and from your winepress. (14) And you shall rejoice in your feast, you, and your son, and your daughter, and your man-servant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the fatherless, and the widow, that are within your gates. (15) Seven days you shall keep a feast unto the Lord your God in the place which the Lord shall choose; because the Lord your God shall bless you in 4 Additionally, unlike the preceding days that use the phrase “”וביום, for  שמיני עצרתit leaves out the “ ”וand merely writes “”ביום.  חז”לpicked up on this distinction as we will see shortly. c  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 153 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון all thine increase, and in all the work of your hands, and you shall be altogether joyful. (16) Three times in a year shall all your males appear before the Lord your God in the place which He shall choose; on the feast of unleavened bread, and on the feast of weeks, and on the feast of tabernacles; and they shall not appear before the Lord empty. (Devarim 16) Shemini Atzeres in the Gemara However, it is not only in the  תורהthat we find that the nature of  שמיני עצרתis not clearly defined. The ז: ירושלמי סוכה הnotes that in  פרשת פנחסthe  תורהuses “ ”וביוםfor all the preceding days of סוכות, but for  שמיני עצרתit only says “”ביום to teach us that it is a  – רגל בפני עצמוa holiday unto itself. Similarly in the  בבלי סוכה מז ע”בwe find that שמיני רגל בפני עצמו לענין פז”ר קש”ב. The  גמראexplains that the mnemonic stands for the six things that make  שמיני עצרתits own holiday: (i) פייס, (ii) זמן, (iii) רגל, (iv) קרבן, (v)  שירהand (vi) ברכה.5 While this  גמראstates that it is a holiday unto itself, it does limit that to six categories. Conversely, the  גמראin  תענית כח ע”בlists the eighteen days during the year that an individual is “גומר בהן את ההלל,” recites a full הלל, and includes in that list “ – ”שמונת ימי החגthe eight days of the חג, which includes שמיני  עצרתwith the rest of סוכות. Similarly, the  משנהin  סוטה מא ע”אprovides the details of the  הקהלceremony. The  גמראasks why the  תורהin י:דברים לא, after already mentioning that it was to happen on  חג הסוכותneeded in the next verse to mention that it was at the time when “ בני ישראלcome to appear before Hashem.” The  גמראanswers that you might have thought that  הקהלcould have been on the “יום טוב אחרון,” i.e. שמיני עצרת, and therefore the  תורהneeded to add a second description of the timing of the event. While the  גמראconcludes that  הקהלis not on שמיני עצרת, the assumption that  שמיני עצרתis part of the חג of  סוכותis never dismissed. The  גמראin  סוכה מח ע”אalso builds a stronger connection between the first seven days of  סוכותand the eighth day as it deduces that the  פסוקof “והיית אך “ ”שמחand you shall be altogether joyful” (טו: )דברים טזcomes to include the “לילי  ”יום טוב האחרוןin the  מצוהof שמחה. In other words, the same  מצוהof  שמחהthat we find on the first seven days of  סוכותflows over to שמיני עצרת. Not only are the  בבליand  ירושלמיunclear as to how to understand 5  – פייסthe ballot to determine which of the 24  משמרותof the  כהניםwould be  מקריבthe קרבנות, (ii)  שהחיינו-  זמןrecited, (iii)  – רגלa major debate amongst the  ראשוניםwhat this means, (iv)  – קרבןa different  קרבןthan the previous seven days, as previously discussed, (v) שירה – שיר sung by the  לוייםand (vi)  ברכה- a debate amongst the ראשונים. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 154 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי the nature of שמיני עצרת, but even  ראשוניםprovide comments that could be interpreted as contradictory. For instance, רש”י סוכה מח ע”א ד”ה רגל, when discussing what the “ ”רגלmentioned by the  גמראas one of the six distinct qualities of  שמיני עצרתrefers to explains that “שאין יושבין בסוכה,” “we don’t sit in the סוכה,” which would imply that while  שמיני עצרתis connected to  סוכותit is simply different in that we no longer sit in the סוכה. However,  רש”יin ראש השנה  ד ע”ב ד”ה פז”רwrites that  רגלmeans that “אין שם חג הסוכות עליו,” “it does not have the title of  חג הסוכותon it,” from which one would infer that  שמיני עצרתis separate from סוכות.6 Practical Differences on how Shemini Atzeres is Classified What has been established up to this point is that it is unclear where on the spectrum of an independent holiday or continuation of  שמיני עצרת,סוכות should be classified. It is therefore not surprising that when looking at practical  הלכהit would seem that many of the debates can be explained as centering around the exact issue of either viewing  שמיני עצרתas a standalone holiday that comes immediately after  סוכותor the eighth day of  סוכותthat just does not share many of the special  הלכותof the first seven days. Two practical differences commonly discussed relate to the  נוסחof the  תפילותon שמיני עצרת.  מחברand  רמ”אargue whether the correct formula for שמונה  עשרהand  ברכת המזוןis “ ”יום שמיני חג העצרת הזהor “”יום שמיני העצרת הזה. It is possible to relate this debate to the issue surrounding the nature of  שמיני עצרתand perhaps the  מחברwho uses the language “ ”יום שמיני חג העצרת הזהwould view שמיני  עצרתas an independent “חג,” while Rama who strips the word “ ”חגfrom the  תפילותbecause “לא מצינו בשום מקום שנקרא חג,” “we do not find in any place that it is called חג,” wants to stress it is a  יום שמיניas he sees  שמיני עצרתas a continuation of  סוכותand not a  חגon its own. Interestingly, the  ט”זmoves the word “ ”חגin the ’מחברs formulation so that the “ ”חגrefers to  סוכותand not  שמיני עצרתand writes to use the following text “יום שמיני עצרת החג הזה.” Similarly, the  שערי תשובהdiscusses a case where one has accidentally used the phrase “ ”יום חג הסוכות הזהon שמיני עצרת. The  שערי תשובהquotes sources that say  בדיעבדyou have fulfilled your requirement of תפילה, while other  אחרוניםwould require you to repeat your שמונה עשרה. This debate too may focus on whether or not  שמיני עצרתis an independent חג. Those that would require you to repeat your  שמונה עשרהwould view  שמיני עצרתas an independent holiday and therefore when you mentions  סוכותin your prayers you have not accomplished anything 6 See משנת יעב”ץ – אורח חיים עא. Rabbi Betzalel Zolty suggests that perhaps  רש”יcould be understood in a case where an individual started  שמיני עצרתearly while it was still the seventh day of סוכות.  רש”יwould rule that the onset of קדושת שמיני עצרת, that is a רגל בפני עצמו, would dismiss the  מצוהto sit in the  סוכהwhich is a defining feature of the  חגof סוכות.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 155 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון as  סוכותhas no bearing on  ;שמיני עצרתit simply proceeds the new holiday. However, if you were to view  שמיני עצרתas a postscript of סוכות, granted it is a special day at the end of  סוכותlacking many of the same unique characteristics, but none the less at its core it is the still the eighth day of סוכות, so  בדיעבדone could be  יצאwhen mistakenly using “יום חג הסוכות הזה.” Another set of topics and potential practical differences are raised by  רמב”ןin  סוכה מח ע”אin his discussion about what the  גמראwas alluding to when it listed “ ”רגל בפני עצמוas one of the six characteristics that make שמיני  עצרתdistinct from סוכות.  רמב”ןexplains that “ ”רגלrefers to עליה לרגל. When one is  עולה לרגלone is required to bring an  עולת ראיהand שלמי חגיגה. If one misses the opportunity to bring the  קרבןon the first day, of a  יום טובthey would have the remaining days of that  יום טובto make up the obligation. However, if you were exempt on the first day of  יום טובfrom bringing the  עולת ראיהthen there would be no  תשלומיןover the remaining days, as  תשלומיןcan only make up for a  קרבןwhere there was an initial obligation.  רמב”ןposits that if one is exempt7 on the first day of  סוכותfrom bringing the קרבן, but became a  בר חיובאduring חול המועד, then you would be obligated again to bring the  עולת ראיהwhen שמיני  עצרתbegins because “אי לא חזי בראשון חזי בשני.”  רמב”ןcontinues and says that it could also be considered its own  חגfor the issue of בל תאחר, which sets a time limit for an individual who volunteers to bring a קרבן. While the  גמרא ראש השנה ה ע”בdebates how many festivals need to pass before you are liable for בל תאחר,  רמב”ןsuggests if  סוכותwas the last chance for you to fulfill your voluntary obligation then once  שמיני עצרתbegins you have transgressed the  איסורof בל תאחר.  רמב”םappears to rule differently on both the issue a renewed obligation for  עולת ראיהand  בל תאחרas they relate to שמיני עצרת. He writes: c  וביום טוב האחרון,מי שלא חג ביום טוב ראשון לחג הסוכות חוגג כל הרגל )ז: ואף השמיני תשלומי ראשון הוא (הלכות חגיגה א,שהוא שמיני One who does not bring his sacrifice on the first day of Sukkos can bring it the during remainder of the holiday and even on the last day of the holiday that is the eight day as even the eighth day can be a make up for the first day. (Hilchos Chagiga 1:7)  רמב”םin the following 8 פרקdiscusses a case of someone that was lame or blind on the first day of the holiday and then is cured of his ailment. רמב”ם ruled that he is exempt from bringing the  קרבןbecause “”ביום חובתו היה פטור “on the day of his obligation he was exempt” as “”כל ימות החג תשלומי ראשון הן 7 For instance one who only becomes  בר מצוהor is  מגיירduring חול המועד. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 156 Y ה: ב8 TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי all the days of the holiday are a make up for the first day. Despite specifically mentioning  שמיני עצרתas a potential  תשלומיןfor the first day of the חג, when discussing those exempt on the first day,  רמב”םmakes no mention of שמיני  עצרתreestablishing the requirement to bring the  עולת ראיהlike  רמב”ןsuggests. Similarly,  רמב”םseems to describe the  איסורof  בל תאחרin a curious manner:  הרי זה עבר בלא תעשה שנאמר...עברו עליו שלש רגלים ולא הקריב קרבנותיו . אינו עובר בלא תעשה עד שיעברו עליו רגלי השנה כולה.לא תאחר לשלמו )יג:(הלכות מעשה הקרבנות יד If three holidays pass and he does not bring his sacrifice … then he has violated a negative commandment as it says do not delay to fulfill. He has not violated the negative commandment until all the holidays of the year have passed. (Hilchos Maaseh haKorbanos 14:13) Why does  רמב”םrepeat that “”אינו עובר בלא תעשה עד שיעברו עליו רגלי השנה כולה when he already clearly described that “three holidays pass” at the beginning of the  הלכהand why add the extra word “ ”כולהat the end? The אור שמח שם explains that  רמב”םmeans to include שמיני עצרת. In other words, unlike רמב”ן who believed you would have violated  בל תאחרafter the first seven days of סוכות,  רמב”םbelieved that you needed to complete  שמיני עצרתas well before violating the איסור. Once again the debate between  רמב”ןand  רמב”םmight revolve around the nature of שמיני עצרת. Perhaps  רמב”ןbelieved that the  גמראwas telling us that  שמיני עצרתis such an independent holiday that it can reestablish the obligations of  עליה לרגלand reintroduce the requirements to bring the appropriate sacrifices.9 Similarly,  שמיני עצרתwill bring the cycle of  רגליםto a close with the completion of the first seven days of  סוכותand you will have transgressed10 the  איסורof בל תאחר.  רמב”םhowever may view  שמיני עצרתas a continuation of  סוכותand therefore would not imagine a new obligation of sacrifices for those that are exempt on the first day and would not believe that you violate  בל תאחרuntil all eight days of  סוכותare completed. The Rav’s Approach Rav Yosef Dov Soloveitchik ( הררי קדםVolume 1, 150 and 151) suggested a more nuanced understanding of the seemingly contradictory descriptions of שמיני עצרת. As previously detailed, the  תורהdescribes the different aspects 9 Although not so much of an independent holiday that had you properly brought your  קרבנותon the first day of  סוכותthat you would have to bring a new set on שמיני עצרת. 10 The רמב”ם, ibid, points out that as there is no action you would not receive lashes for the transgression.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 157 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון of each of the holidays in three primary chapters. The Rav proposed that in  פרשת אמרand פרשת פנחס, where  שמיני עצרתis primarily described as a separate holiday,11 then the laws found there like שביתה,  איסור מלאכהand the קרבן מוסף would reflect the independent status of the day. However, in  פרשת ראהwhere the  גמראextended the idea of  שמחהfrom  סוכותto  שמיני עצרתthen the eight days are considered one long holiday and all of the  דיניםof  עליה לרגלand  שמחהthat apply to  סוכותcontinue to apply to שמיני עצרת. This distinction could lead to some interesting practical differences as well as explain some atypical הלכות. For instance, in the previously discussed case where one has accidentally used the phrase “ ”יום חג הסוכות הזהon שמיני  עצרתwe could distinguish between making a mistake in  שמונה עשרהand one who errs while reciting קידוש. The main objective of  קידושis to highlight the  קדושהof the day manifested through the איסור מלאכה. The  איסור מלאכהis a feature found in  פרשת אמרand accordingly it is an attribute connected to the  תורהdescription of  שמיני עצרתas an independent day. Therefore, if one makes a mistake and mentions  סוכותinstead of  שמיני עצרתin  קידושyou would not fulfill your obligation as  סוכותhas no bearing on  שמיני עצרתin the realm of איסור מלאכה. However, referencing  שמיני עצרתin  תפילהstems from the desire to draw attention to the  קדושהof the רגל, which is derived from  סוכותin פרשת ראה, and as a result you could be יצא בדיעבד. Another potential application of this fine distinction can be made in the  גמראin  מועד קטן כד ע”בwhich discusses a case of Shiva where a family member passes away the day before סוכות. As long as the mourner observed a moment of Shiva before  סוכותbegan,  יום טובcancels the remainder of Shiva. As such, the day before  סוכותcounts as seven days and the seven days of  סוכותcount as an additional seven days towards שלשים. The  גמראquotes an opinion that  שמיני עצרתitself also counts as seven days and therefore the mourner exits יום  טובwith twenty one of the thirty days of the  שלשיםperiod complete. Now if  שמיני עצרתis an independent holiday it would make sense that the additional  יום טובwould impact the period of mourning. However, according to this view that  שמיני עצרתcancels out a seven day period of שלשים, why does it not cancel out the entire remaining period of  שלשיםin the same way  סוכותcancels out the remainder of Shiva? If a mourner was already observing שלשים before any יום טוב, the holiday terminates the remaining days of שלשים. Some 12  ראשוניםexplain that as the mourner has not yet demonstrated any of the  שלשיםrestrictions,13  שמיני עצרתis unable to additionally cancel out שלשים. The 11 Particularly in light of the way  סוכותis described as a seven day holiday. 12 רא”ש כח 13 Like refraining from haircutting. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 158 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי Rav provides another possible reason for this uncommon  הלכהby explaining that the reason  יום טובis able to cancel of אבילות, is because mourning is incongruous with  יום טובas there is a requirement of שמחה.14 As such, שמיני עצרת, which derived its  חיובof  שמחהon the first seven days of סוכות, is not a completely independent holiday when it comes to this  הלכהand therefore cannot cancel out the remaining days of שלשים. Lastly, the  גמראin  סוכה מז ע”אrecords a dispute between  ר’ יהודהand the  רבנןwhether or not the size of the water libations on  שמיני עצרתare the same as the preceding seven days. The Rav wonders, how is it possible that ר’ יהודה, who says that it is the same  ניסוך המיםon שמיני עצרת, can simultaneously list other characteristics that are different on  שמיני עצרתthan the rest of סוכות. If it is a  רגל בפני עצמוfor other issues, why does he disagree when it comes to water libations and rule that they are the same on  שמיני עצרתas they are on the seven preceding days? Perhaps, the Rav explains,  ר’ יהודהand the  רבנןare arguing about what factor obligates ניסוך המים. The Rav posits that the  רבנןviewed the water libations as being derived from  קדושת היוםof the  קרבןfound in פרשת פנחת and therefore  שמיני עצרתwould have its own distinct quantity for ניסוך המים. ’ר  יהודהhowever, viewed  ניסוך המיםas an outgrowth of the topics discussed in פרשת  ראהand therefore linked the water libations of  שמיני עצרתto the rest of סוכות. Message of Shemini Atzeres A number of final questions remain. • Why did Hashem create a  יום טובwith either so many ambivalences as to whether it is part of the preceding holiday or a day of its own, or design a day with such a nuanced attitude? • Why devise a day that has no special  מצוותand is bereft of any historical significance or any agricultural celebration? • Why did  חז”לselect  פרשת ראהas the  תורהreading when  שמיני עצרתis not even mentioned? The  גמראin  תענית כד ע”בquotes an interesting story about רבא.  רבאhad a man punished and he died. The matter reached the ears of King Shapur and he sought to punish רבא. Whereupon Ifra Hormuz, the mother of King Shapur, said to her son, “Do not interfere with the Jews because whatever they ask of their God grants them.” The king asked her, “For example?” “They pray and rain falls,” [she replied]. He retorted: “This must have been because it is the season for rain; let them pray now, in the Tammuz cycle for rain.” She sent a message to רבא: “Concentrate now your mind and pray 14 See  תוס’ מועד קטן כג ע"ב ד"ה מאן דאמרwho explains that as  שבתlacks the requirement of שמחה it is unable to cancel out mourning.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 159 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון for rain.” He prayed but no rain fell. He then exclaimed: “Master of the Universe, ‘O God, we have heard with our ears, our fathers have told us; a work Thou didst in their days, in the days of old, but as for us we have not seen with our eyes.” Whereupon there followed such a heavy fall of rain that the gutters of Machuza emptied their waters into the Tigris. ’רבאs father then appeared unto him in a dream and said to him: “Is there anyone who troubles Heaven so much? Change thy sleeping place.” He changed his place and next morning he discovered that his bed had been cut with knives.” רש”י  שם ד”ה בסכיניexplains that שדים, evil spirits, wanted to kill him. Perhaps this  גמראcan explain the purpose of the סוכה.15 Beginning in אלול,  בני ישראלappeal to Hashem for forgiveness. However it is not just a one-time prayer or request. It accelerates at the start of סליחות, builds through the עשרת ימי תשובה, intensifies on  יום כיפורand then peaks at נעילה. How many times over this period do we ask Hashem for forgiveness? How many times do we repeat the special formula of the  ?י”ג מדות הרחמיםHashem is our father in the heavens, loves us and wants nothing more than for us to succeed, but at some point you could imagine that He says “enough.” We are like a child in the backseat of car constantly asking “when are we going to be there?” At some point the parent is going to lose their cool and snap at the child. That is why Hashem sends us to the סוכה. Just like רבא, who “troubles Heaven so much” that he is forced to flee from his bed to ensure his own safety, so to  בני ישראלafter weeks of unending requests to Hashem must leave their shelter and head to the סוכה for protection. Hashem answered ’רבאs request as we hope He will answer our prayers, but there are repercussions. Then the seven days pass and we are permitted once again to return home.  שמיני עצרתmarks our return to Hashem with a clean slate at the end of a long holiday cycle. Hashem gifts us an extra day to spend with him back in our homes.16 On that day it is important to appreciate the process we have just endured. First, we have finished our seven day timeout and now can celebrate on a day that both reminds of the previous holiday, but simultaneously has a feel of its own. It is also a day that makes you not only appreciate the completed  סוכותbut the  ראש השנהand  יום כיפורwhose constant pleas necessitated the move out of our house. That is why the number of bulls, rams, lambs and goats offered on  שמיני עשרתmatch the offerings for  ראש השנהand יום כיפור. Now that time has passed we can better appreciate and rejoice with Hashem in our achieved atonement. 15 Heard from R. Ralph Pelcovitz 16 At least in ארץ ישראל. OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון Z 160 Y TISHREI 5775 • תשע"ה תשרי  שמיני עצרתhas no other obligations17 and no celebrations of past history or agrarian success because we have come to the end of a full year’s worth of holidays and Hashem now gives us the opportunity to just celebrate our connection to Him. We get to reflect on our relationship without a special need to thank Him for redeeming us from Egypt or express gratitude for the grain harvest, but just a general sense of appreciation that He is always there for בני ישראל. It is therefore not surprising that  חז”לchose a  תורהreading that doesn’t actually mention the  יום טובwe are celebrating.  חז”לas well saw the opportunity in  שמיני עצרתto simply appreciate our relationship with Hashem, looking back on a completed cycle of חגים. So too ’חז”לs choice to make the day into  שמחת תורהseems wholeheartedly appropriate as there is no better way to exhibit our relationship with Hashem then through the  תורהthat He gave בני ישראל. As such, while describing the nature of  שמיני עצרתcan be complex and nuanced, the purpose of the day is clear. 17 Except according to the  רמב”ןfor a young boy in the times of the  בית המקדשwho became  בר מצוהduring  חול המועד סוכותand now has a renewed obligation to bring an  עולת ראיהand שלמי חגיגה.  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 161 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון דברי תורה בעברית בעניני סוכות $ תשרי תשע"ה • TISHREI 5775 Z 162 Y אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 163 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון איסור לאכול חוץ לסוכה כיון דאיכא רק מצות אכילה בסוכה ,וכן איכא רק מצות לבישת ציצית ואין איסור ללבוש בגד ד’ כנפות בלי ציצית 7.והביא ראיה לדבריו מדברי המשנה ברורה (ביאור הלכה סימן ס’ סעיף ד’ ד”ה וי”א) וז”ל :ועיין בב”ח ובפמ”ג בסימן ח’ ובסימן תרכ”ה דמשמע מדבריהם דמצות ציצית וסוכה הכונה בהם לעיכובא כמו בשאר המצות ולפ”ז אם קראוהו לתורה ולוקח טליתו או טלית הקהל לעלות לבימה שאז זמנו בהול ומסתמא אינו מכוין אז בלבישתו לקיים המ”ע של ציצית ממילא עובר בזה על המ”ע אם לא כשמכוין לשם מצוה ואז יוכל לברך ג”כ והעולם אינם נזהרין בזה ,עכ”ל. וע”ש בהמשך דברי המנחת שלמה שדן עוד בענין ,וכ’ דאפשר לחלק בין סוכה לציצית. אכן יש להביא סמך לדברי המנח”ח מתוס’ (ד”ה דאו’ תני פסולה) דכ’ דלמא יבא לידי “איסורא דאו’” .משמע דאיכא כעין איסור לאכול חוץ לסוכה ואי”ז רק חסרון בקיום המצוה .מ”מ אי”ז ראיה נגד הגרשז”א די”ל דמיירי רק דביטל העשה.  7אכן הפני יהושע בדף כה .משמע קצת כמוש”כ המנחת חינוך ,אבל הגרע”א (שו”ת החדשות סימן ב’ וחידושיו לדף כה ).חולק עליו וס”ל כדעת הגרשז”א. תשרי תשע"ה • TISHREI 5775 Z 164 Y אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON ולפי”ז יש לעיין אם כוונה זו היא עיקר הקיום של ישיבה בסוכה ,והיא מעכבת קיום המצוה או דאינו מעכב רק מי שמכוין לכך מקיים המצוה בשלימותה .מלשון הב”ח שכ’ :ויראה לי לומר בזה שסובר דכיון דכתיב למען ידעו וגו’ לא קיים המצוה כתיקונה אם לא ידע כוונת מצות הסוכה כפי פשטה ,עכ”ל ,משמע דכוונה זו היא רק לכתחילה לקיים מצוה בשלמותה .אבל המחצית השקל (או”ח סימן ח’) כ’ דמשמעות הב”ח היא דעיקר הקיום תלוי בידיעה זכר ליציאת מצרים וזכר לענני 4 הכבוד .ובודאי אין כוונה זו לעיכובא ,דכל זמן שהוא מכוין לשם מצוה י”ל דהוא מקיים מצות סוכה. אלא דאיכא נ”מ בליל ראש’ דאם אכל כזית (או כביצה) בלי כוונה לשם יצ”מ וענני הכבוד אפשר דטוב לחזור ולאכול בכונה לכך .אף יש לדחות כיון דודאי יצא יד”ח אין הידור לחזור ולעשות המצוה באופן מהודר. אכן הביכורי יעקב (תרכה ,ס”ק ג’) חולק על המחצית השקל והפמ”ג וס”ל דכוונה זו הויא לעיכובא ,כיון דהקפידה תורה בפירוש בטעם המצוה .ודימה זה למי שלא סיפר טעמי המצות בליל 5 הסדר. ויש לעיין במי שלא נתכוין כלל לשם מצוה אם הוא יצא יד”ח או לא .ואי אמרי’ דלא יצא ידי חובתו י”ל דלא הוי כאילו אכל חוץ לסוכה ,או הוי כאילו אכל חוץ לסוכה. ובטעמא די”ל דאפי’ לא נתכוין לשם מצוה עדיין יצא ידי חובתו ,איכא ב’ אפשריות: אי אמרי’ מצות אי”צ כונה. אפי’ אם מצות צריכות כוונה ,י”ל כדעת הר”ן במס’ ר”ה (הו”ד בכסף משנה להל’ שופר ב:ד) דלא בעי’ כונה כיון שנהנה מגוף המעשה מצוה. וכיון דקיי”ל בשו”ע (ס:ד) דמצוות צריכות כוונה ,יש לדחות הצד הא’ .ובאפשרות הב’ יש לחלק בין מש”כ הר”ן לגבי אכילת מצה דהמעשה אכילה הויא כל המצוה ובין הכא דאין המעשה אכילה גופה של מצוה ,אלא המצוה היא הישיבה בסוכה רק דהישיבה נקבעה ע”י אכילה שתייה ושינה בתוך הסוכה .לכן אין לומר דהנאתו מן האכילה עומדת במקום כונתו כיון דאי”ז כל מעשה המצוה. וכן ראיתי בשם הגר”ח סולובייצ’יק (שיעורים לזכר אבא מרי ז”ל) .אכן ,אפשר לומר דבליל ראש’ יש לחלק דילפי’ מגזירה שוה ט”ו ט”ו דאיכא חיוב אכילה דומה לאכילת מצה ,וכ”כ המ”ב (סימן ס’ ב”ה ד”ה וי”א) .אך מ”מ יש לחלק דעיקר החיוב עדיין הישיבה בסוכה ,וצ”ע. ובצד דלא יצא י”ח אם אכל בלא כוונה לשם מצוה נחלקו האחרונים אם עבר אאיסור או לא. המנחת חינוך (מצוה שכה ,אות י’) כ’ דאם לא קיים המצוה לא הוה כאילו הוא אכל חוץ לסוכה ,אלא כמי שלא קיים המצוה כלל ,כגון מי שאין לו בגד ד’ כנפות ולכן לא לבש ציצית .ולא הוי ביטול עשה בידים 6.ודבריו מיוסין על ההנחה דאיכא ג’ דרגות בקיום מצות סוכה. 1.1מי שיושב בסוכה כדת וכדין מקיים מצוה בשלימותה. 2.2מי שיושב בסוכה שלא כדת וכדין אינו מקיים המצוה אבל אינו כמי שאכל חוץ לסוכה. 3.3מי שאוכל חוץ לסוכה מבטל המצוה בידים והוה כאילו עובר אאיסור לאכול חוץ לסוכה. אכן הגרש”ז אויערבאך (שו”ת מנחת שלמה סימן א’) חולק עליו וס”ל דלא יצא י”ח כלל ,ואף הוי כאילו עבר אאיסור אכילה חוץ לסוכה אם לא קיים המצוה .וחולק אעיקר הנחת המנח”ח דאיכא  4וכ”כ הפמ”ג (מ”ז ד”ה כ’ הטור) וכן פסק המ”ב ס”ק א’.  5ואף דלדעת הר”ן עדיין יצא יד”ח בדיעבד ,טעמו משום דלא תקנו הרבנן דלא יצא (או דאין להם כח לבטל מצותו) .אבל הכא כונה זו מדאו’ ושפיר מעכבת.  6כ’ כן כדי לת’ קושית התוס’ בדף ט( .ד”ה ההוא מיבעיא) שהק’ אמאי בעי’ קרא למעוטי סוכה גזולה ,הא איכא דין מצוה הבאה בעבירה .ותי’ בתוס’ דמצוה ה”ב אינו אלא דין דרבנן ,אבל סוכה גזולה פסולה מדאו’ .אבל המנח”ח לא ניחא ליה בתי’ זה וכ’ דסוכה גזולה הויא כמי שאכל חוץ לסוכה ,משא”כ מצוה הבאה בעבירה אינו אלא פגם בקיום מצותו. אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON Z 165 Y  • TISHREI 5775תשרי תשע"ה בענין כוונה במצות ישיבה בסוכה הרב יהודה בלסים ת $ נן בריש מסכת סוכה :סוכה שהיא גבוהה למעלה מעשרים אמה  -פסולה ,ורבי יהודה מכשיר. נחלקו האמוראים בטעמא דפסול למעלה מכ’ ,וז”ל הגמ’ :אמר רבה :דאמר קרא (ויקרא כג) למען ידעו דרתיכם כי בסכות הושבתי את בני ישראל ,עד עשרים אמה  -אדם יודע שהוא דר בסוכה, למעלה מעשרים אמה  -אין אדם יודע שדר בסוכה ,משום דלא שלטא בה עינא .רבי זירא אמר :מהכא (ישעיהו ד) וסכה תהיה לצל יומם מחרב ,עד עשרים אמה  -אדם יושב בצל סוכה ,למעלה מעשרים אמה  -אין אדם יושב בצל סוכה ,אלא בצל דפנות ...ורבא אמר :מהכא (ויקרא כג) בסכת תשבו שבעת ימים .אמרה תורה :כל שבעת הימים צא מדירת קבע ושב בדירת עראי .עד עשרים אמה  -אדם עושה דירתו דירת עראי ,למעלה מעשרים אמה  -אין אדם עושה דירתו דירת עראי ,אלא דירת קבע. וקיי”ל להלכה כשיטת רבא דבעי’ דירת עראי ,אף דמותר לבנות הסוכה ביתידות של ברזל .רש”י פי’ ,דאיכא שיעור עראי ולא בעי’ בנין עראי דוקא .אבל תוס’ (ד”ה כי עביד) פי’ דאף דמותר לבנות הדפנות כך ,אין לבנות הסכך באופן קבע אלא בעי’ דוקא ארעי .וכן י”ל בדעת (ד”ה ושחמתה) שכ’ ועל שם הסכך קרוי סוכה .פי’ ,דמה דבעי’ דירת עראי וכן שאר דיני סוכה שייך אך ורק לסכך ולא לדפנות. ואף דלא קיי”ל כשיטות רבה ורבי זירא בענין זה ,לומדים מהם הלכות אחרות בענין סוכה .רבה כ’ דילפי’ מ”למען ידעו דורותיכם” דצריך לראות הסכך ,והגמ’ דחה דבריו דההיא ידיעה לדורות, דהיינו ,לאו בידיעה דישיבת סוכה קאמר ,אלא בידיעות דורות הבאין היקף סוכות ענני כבוד הנעשה לאבות (רש”י). ונראה דדין זה שייך להמח’ לקמן (יא ):בין ר”ע ור”א אי סוכות דידן הוו זכר לסוכות ממש או לענני הכבוד 1.וקשה ,דבעלמא אמרי’ מאי דהוה הוה אי ליכא נ”מ במחלקת .לכן צ”ל דהנ”מ הוא בכונת היושב בסוכה אי צריך לכוין זכר לעניני הכבוד או לסוכות ממש .וכ”כ הב”ח (סימן תרכה ד”ה 3 בסוכות תשבו) בביאור הטור( 2שם) והמחבר (סעיף א’) שפסקו דסוכה זכר לענני הכבוד.  1וע”ש במסורת הש”ס שם דאיכא גירסא אחרת בתורת כהנים ,דר”א ס”ל סוכות ממש ור”ש ס”ל ענני הכבוד .ואולי זוהי גירסא העיקרית כיון דפסק הטור והמחבר דבעי’ זכר לענני הכבוד .ובעלמא (עיין שבת דף קל :ונדה דף ז ):אמרי’ דלא קיי”ל כשיטת רבי אליעזר דשמותי הוה.  2ועפי”ז יש לבאר המשך דברי הטור שכ’ דאי הוה זכר ליציאת מצרים אמאי לא יושבין בסוכה בניסן ותי’ וז”ל :לפי שהוא ימות הקיץ ודרך כל אדם לעשות סוכה לצל ולא היתה ניכרת עשייתנו בהם שהם במצות הבורא יתברך ולכן צוה אותנו שנעשה בחדש השביעי שהוא זמן הגשמים ודרך כל אדם לצאת מסוכתו ולישב בביתו ואנחנו יוצאין מן הבית לישב בסוכה בזה יראה לכל שמצות המלך היא עלינו לעשותה ,עכ”ל. ויש לפ’ דאין כונתו להראות לאוה”ע או לשאר בנ”א דאנן עושים לשם מצוה ,אלא להראות לעצמנו כדי שתהא לנו כוונה לשם מצוה ובפרט לשם זכר לענני הכבוד כדי לקיים עיקר מצות סוכה.  3וכ”כ בסעיף ח’ לגבי מצות ציצית ,ובסימן כה לגבי תפילין .בשני המקומות פסק המחבר דבעי’ כוונה מיוחדת ,ופי’ הב”ח משום דכתיב ...וכ”כ המשנה ברורה. תשרי תשע"ה • TISHREI 5775 Z 166 Y אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON  • תשרי תשע"הTISHREI 5775 Z 167 Y OHR HATZAFON • אור הצפון אין כאן זלזול ליום טוב השני כלל כיון שאין המצות תלויות בעיקר קדושת היום כלל שהרי מצות נטילת לולב לא תלה הכתוב חיובו מחמת שהוא יום טוב אלא מחמת שהוא יום הראשון שנאמר ולקחתם לכם ביום הראשון”. הנה היש אומרים הוא סברת הרב סולובייצ’יק .ולכאורה הרא”ש דלא תירץ כזה אפשר לומר דס”ל דתקנת יו”ט שני כולל כל המצוות של יו”ט ראשון .וזהו כמו הדעה הראשונה שהביא השו”ע הרב. וא”כ הרא”ש הוא לשיטתו כשהוא פוסק (סוכה פרק ג סימן ג) דיו”ט שני דינו כיו”ט ראשון לענין פסולי הד’ מינים ,וז”ל“ :נמצא שאין חילוק בין יו”ט ראשון לכל שאר הימים אלא בחסר כדאמר לקמן רבי חנינא מטבל ונפק ביה וכן שאול אבל כל שאר הפסולים נוהגים בכל הימים ויו”ט שני דידן הוא כיום הראשון דספיקא הוא וראיתי דעות אחרות לפוסקים ונלאיתי לכותבם כי לא ישרו בעיני וכאשר כתבתי כך עיקר ”.משא”כ לפי סברת הרב סולובייצ’יק דתקנת יו”ט שני אינו חל על מצות סוכה ולולב .וכזה פוסק הרמב”ם (הל’ סוכה ח”ט) וז”ל“ :כל אלו שאמרנו שהם פסולין מפני מומין שבארנו או מפני גזל וגניבה ביום טוב ראשון בלבד אבל ביום טוב שני עם שאר הימים הכל כשר”. והנה עיין בט”ז (או”ח -תרלט:י) שמביא ב’ דיעות אם יש להקפיד לאכול כזית בסוכה בליל שני כשהגשמים יורדים .ולכאורה הב’ דיעות האלו ג”כ חולקים באותה שאלה ,האם חז”ל תיקנו יו”ט שני רק לענין קדושת היום או גם לגבי מצוות היום. ולענין הלכה למעשה ,הטור (או”ח -תסא) מביא את ב’ הדיעות ,דעת הראבי”ה (אבי עזרי) ודעת אביו הרא”ש שפסק כרבינו יעקב ברבינו שמשון .השו”ע (שם) פוסק כהרא”ש להחליף הסדר בליל שני .והרמ”א (שם) מסכים שכן ראוי לנהוג .המשנה ברורה (שם) וגם בהשער הציון (שם) מביא כמה אחרונים שפוסקים כדעת הראבי”ה שאין לשנות הסדר .ולכן המשנה ברורה מכריע שאע”פ שדעתו שאין לזוז מפסק השו”ע והרמ”א ,מ”מ מי שרוצה לנהוג כדעת הראבי”ה א”א למחות בידו כיון שהרבה אחרונים סוברים כמותו .אבל הוא מוסיף שבסוכה אחת שכמה בעה”ב אומרים קידוש צריכים כולם להסכים לדעה א’ ולא לנהוג אחד כזה ואחד כזה. תשרי תשע"ה • TISHREI 5775 Z 168 Y אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON הנה הרא”ש (סוכה פרק ד אות ד) כותב וז”ל“ :גרסי’ בפרק החליל (דף נו א) איתמר רב יהודה אמר סוכה ואח”כ זמן רבה בר בר חנה אמר זמן ואח”כ סוכה והלכתא סוכה ואח”כ זמן יש מן הגדולים אומרים דבליל שני אומר זמן תחלה דזמן לא קאי אסוכה דאפילו אם היה ליל יו”ט ראשון חול יצא בזמן דסוכה ולפי סברת בני אייבר”א שחלקו בין בשעת עשייה בין לאחר עשייה קאי זמן נמי אסוכה”. כוונת הרא”ש היא להגמ’ (מו“ -):תנו רבנן :העושה סוכה לעצמו אומר ברוך שהחיינו כו’ ,נכנס לישב בה אומר ברוך אשר קדשנו כו’ .היתה עשויה ועומדת ,אם יכול לחדש בה דבר  -מברך ,אם לאו  -לכשיכנס לישב בה מברך שתים .אמר רב אשי :חזינא ליה לרב כהנא דקאמר להו לכולהו אכסא דקדושא” .משמעות הגמ’ היא שבאמת הברכה של שהחיינו על הסוכה היתה ראויה לאומרה בגמר הבנין ,אלא דכדי לקבוע אותה על הכוס תיקנו להמתין עד ליל ראשון כדי לכלול אותה עם קידוש היום .ולכן לא גרע ברכת שהחיינו בליל ראשון שהוא ספק חול מברכה שהוא אומר בשעת בנין הסוכה .ולפי זה בליל ראשון יוצא החיוב של ברכת שהחיינו על הסוכה ממה נפשך ,ואם היינו אומרים בליל שני ברכת לישב קודם להשהחיינו יהיה הפסק בין הקידוש ,שהוא צריך שהחיינו מטעם ספקא דיומא ,להשהחיינו .ולכן ראוי לומר בליל שני קידוש ואח’’כ שהחיינו ורק אח’’כ הלישב בסוכה. והקשה רבינו יוסף בער הלוי סולובייצ’יק (הררי קדם עמ’ רד) על ביאורו של הרא”ש ,ע”פ שיטת הרא”ש עצמו במק”א .דהנה הרא”ש סובר כמו שכתבו התוס’ (סוכה דף מו .ד”ה נכנס לישב בה מברך לישב בסוכה) ד”כיון דסוכה מחמת חג קאתיא סברא הוא דזמן דידה אע”פ שבירך בחול פטור הוא אף בחג דזמן כי קא אתי מחמת מועד קאתי אפילו בלא יום טוב” .ולפי סברא זו כמו שיכול לברך שהחיינו על הסוכה לפני החג גם כן יכול לברך על היום לפני החג .ואם כן אמאי בעינן ברכת שהחיינו בליל שני בשום אופן? ולכן הרב סולובייצ’יק מסביר את שיטת הרבינו יעקב ברבינו שמשון בדרך אחרת ,וז”ל“ :ונראה בזה דשיטות אלו סוברים דאין תקנה כלל של יו”ט שני וספיקא דיומא לגבי מצות סוכה ,אלא לענין קדושת יו”ט ואסור מלאכה .ונמצא שלענין מצות סוכה יו”ט ראשון הוא עיקר ,וישיבת סוכה ביו”ט שני היא ככל חוה”מ וע”כ אין מברך עליה זמן”. והביא ראיה לסברא זו מסדר הפסוקים בפרשת אמור ,כי הפסוקים של קדושת היום נכללים בקבוצה א’ (ויקרא כג:לג-לז) ,והפסוקים של מצוות היום ,כמו סוכה ולולב ,נכללים בקבוצה ב’ (ויקרא כג:לט-מג), ויש הפסק דפסוק “אלה מועדי” ביניהם .וע”פ הוא כותב וז”ל“ :ונראה מכ”ז דמצות סוכה ולולב אינם תלויים בקדושת היום אלא הם מצוות בפ”ע הנוהגים בזמן של החג .ולפ”ז נראה לומר דתקנת ספיקא דיומא אינה חלה אלא על גוף קדושת היום והמצוות התלויים בו ,אבל סוכה ולולב לפי שאינם חיובים הנובעים מכח קדושת היום ,אינם בכלל התקנה דיו”ט שני וספיקא דיומא ,והרי הם כספירת העומר לגבי המועד דחג המצות ,שעל מצות הספירה לא חלה תקנת יו”ט שני של גליות  ,וע”כ גם הכא אין מברכים זמן על סוכה ביו”ט שני”. וכיסוד דבריו מבואר בשו”ע הרב (או”ח -תרמט:כא) וז”ל“ :כל הפסולין ביום ראשון וכשרים מיום שני ואילך היינו בארץ ישראל שיום שני הוא חול המועד ובחוץ לארץ שעושין יום טוב שני ימים יש אומרים שכל הפסולין הנוהגין בראשון מן התורה נוהגין ביום טוב שני מדברי סופרים דכיון שתקנו יום טוב שני מפני הספק שמא הוא יום טוב ראשון א”כ צריך לנהוג בו מחמת הספק כל החומרות של יום טוב הראשון .ויש אומרים כיון שאנו בקיאים בקביעות החודש ויודעין אנו שהשני הוא חול ואין אנו נוהגין בו קודש אלא שלא לזלזל במנהג אבותינו שהיו בזמן שמקדשין על פי הראיה שאז לא היה הדבר תלוי בידיעת חשבון קביעות החדשים ואין אנו מצווים אלא שלא לזלזל בעיקר קדושת היום ולפיכך אנו מקדשין על הכוס ומברכין זמן ביום טוב שני כמו ביום טוב הראשון אבל דברים שאינן מעיקר קדושת היום אלא שהן מצות הנוהגות באותו היום בלבד כגון כל הפסולין ביום טוב הראשון בלבד ואף אם לא תהיינה מצות הללו נוהגות ביום טוב שני אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON Z 169 Y  • TISHREI 5775תשרי תשע"ה בענין סדר הברכות דקידוש בליל שני של סוכות יונתן זאב קירשנער ב $ כל שנה אנו פוגעים בהשאלה איך לנהוג לגבי סדר הברכות דקידוש בב’ לילי סוכות הראשונים .יש אומרים שבכל לילה (בין בליל ראשון בין בליל שני שהוא ספק ראשון) הסדר הוא קידוש ואח’’כ לישב בסוכה ואח’’כ שהחיינו .ויש אומרים שבליל שני מהפכים הלישב בסוכה והשהחיינו. הסוגיא מתחלת בסוכה (נא“ -):איתמר רב אמר סוכה ואח”כ זמן רבה בר בר חנה אמר זמן ואחר כך סוכה רב אמר סוכה ואחר כך זמן חיובא דיומא עדיף רבה בר בר חנה אמר זמן ואחר כך סוכה תדיר ושאינו תדיר תדיר קודם” .ושם (נו ):הגמ’ מביאה הכרעה בשאלה זו“ :דרש רב נחמן בר רב חסדא :לא כדברי רב דאמר סוכה ואחר כך זמן ,אלא :זמן ואחר כך סוכה .ורב ששת בריה דרב אידי אמר :סוכה ואחר כך זמן. והלכתא :סוכה ואחר כך זמן”. הרמב”ם (הל’ סוכה ו:ב) מביא את פסק הגמ’“ :כל זמן שייכנס לישב בסוכה כל שבעה ,מברך קודם שיישב אשר קידשנו במצוותיו וציוונו לישב בסוכה .ובלילי יום טוב הראשון ,מברך על הסוכה ,ואחר כך מברך על הזמן ,ומסדר כל הברכות על הכוס” .וכן פוסק המחבר (שו”ע -או”ח תרמג:א). אולם ההגהות מיימוניות (הל’ סוכה :פרק ו ,אות ר) מביא דעה לחלק בין ליל א’ לליל ב’ וז”ל“ :והנה רבינו יעקב ברבינו שמשון היה נוהג כן בלילה הראשון אבל בליל שני היה אומר זמן ואחר כך סוכה וטעמא דלילה הראשון בא זמן בעבור סוכה ובעבור קדוש הילכך אומר על שניהם אבל בליל שני אינו בא זמן רק בעבור קדוש כי זמן דסוכה כבר נפטר בליל ראשון לפיכך אומר זמן מיד אחר קדוש קודם ברכת סוכה. וראבי”ה כתב שגם בליל שני יברך זמן לבסוף דיקנה”ז יוכיח דזמן אינו בא בעבור הבדלה ואעפ”כ אומר זמן אחריה וכן דעת המחבר וכן נראה עיקר שלא מצינו חלוק בין שני ימים הראשונים”. לכאורה שיטת הראבי”ה היא פשוט שלא מצינו חילוק בין שני ימים הראשונים .ועוד יש להעיר דכמו דאמרינן שהחיינו בליל ב’ מפני ספיקא דיומא ,יש גם ספק דשמא עדיין לא יצאנו מצות סוכה ,ושפיר יש להמתין לברך שהחיינו לאחר ברכת לישב בסוכה. אבל שיטת הרבינו יעקב ברבינו שמשון לכאורה צריך ביאור .מדוע בליל ראשון השהחיינו עולה על הסוכה ועל הקדוש ,אבל בליל שני “אינו בא זמן רק בעבור קדוש כי זמן דסוכה כבר נפטר בליל ראשון”? ממה נפשך ,אם אנו יוצאים באמירת שהחיינו בליל ראשון על הסוכה מדוע לא יוצאים על היום ,ואם לא יוצאים על היום מדוע יוצאים על הסוכה? והנה ראיתי שתי מהלכים בביאור סברת הרבינו יעקב ברבינו שמשון: Yoni Kirschner is a controller at The Melohn Group. Yoni and Michele, and their children Rayla, Dovid and Netanel joined BKNW in 2012. תשרי תשע"ה • TISHREI 5775 Z 170 Y אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON אין להחמיר בקטן דהא אין דרשה של בני ישראל ולא בנות ישראל שייך בקטנים .ולכאורה אם המשנ”ב רוצה להחמיר אף לשיטת רבינו תם הו”ל להחמיר גם שנשים וקטנים פסולים בטויה .ולא שמענו חומרא כזו! מסקנא דמילתא דלפי שיטת המחבר פשוט וברור שנשים כשרות לכתחילה בעשיית הסוכה. ואף הרמ”א שהחמיר לכתחילה בעשיית ציצית אפשר דרק החמיר כן לענין ציצית ולא לענין סוכה. אי סבר הרמ”א כשיטת ר”ת (כמו שביארו הרבה אחרונים בדבריו) מובן שיש להחמיר לכתחילה אף בעשיית סוכה וכשיטת המג”א (סימן יד ס”ק ג’) .אבל הוכחנו דמפשטות דברי הרמ”א משמע שכונתו רק להחמיר לשיטת מהר”ם והגהות מיימוניות ולהחמיר לכתחילה רק בציצית ולא בסוכה, וא”כ אין מקום לחומרא זו לפסול נשים בעשיית סוכה אפילו לכתחילה. אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON Z 171 Y  • TISHREI 5775תשרי תשע"ה סוכה לכתחילה .לפי שיטת המהר”ם ,בהבנת הבית יוסף בדבריו ,יש לחוש לכתחילה שלא תבנה האשה את הסוכה כמו שמחמירים לכתחילה שלא תעשה ציצית .אבל להבנת הגהות מיימוניות בדבריו דמיוסד על הדרשה של “בני ישראל” אין מקום להחמיר על נשים שלא לבנות סוכה דאין שום דרשה כזו למעט נשים מסוכה. 2.2בדיעבד .אף אם כבר עשו ציצית האם פסולים בדיעבד? לשיטת תוס’ כשרים לכתחילה ,לפי שיטת ר”ת פסולים ,ולפי שיטת מהר”ם אין לעשותם לכתחילה אבל כשרים בדיעבד. 3.3קטנים .לפי שיטת התוס’ קטנים כשרים בעשיית ציצית כמו נשים ,לפי שיטת רבינו תם פסולים כמו נשים ,ולפי שיטת מהר”ם תלוי בב’ הבנות .אם עיקר שיטתו מיוסד על כל מי שאינו מחויב בדבר ,גם קטנים אינם מחוייבים בדבר ולכן אין להניחם לכתחילה לעשות ציצית ,ואם עיקר שיטתו מיוסד על “בני ישראל” ולא בנות ישראל ,גם קטנים נכללו בתוך בני ישראל וכשרים לעשות ציצית לכתחילה. 4.4טויית ציצית .העיר הקרבן נתנאל בגיטין שם בענין טויה .לכאורה אי סברי דנשים כשרות בטויית חוטי הציצית אין כל ראיה נגד ר”ת מאשת ר’ חנינא בן דוסא דהא אפשר שאשת ר’ חנינא בן דוסא רק עשתה טויית הציצית ולא קשירת החוטין .ומדהביא הרא”ש קושיא על שיטת ר”ת מאשת ר’ חנינא בן דוסא מבואר דהרא”ש הבין בשיטת ר”ת דנשים פסולות גם בטויה .אז לשיטת התוס’ פשוט דנשים כשרות בטויית החוטין ,לשיטת ר”ת (כמו שהוכיח הקרבן נתנאל מהבנת הרא”ש בדבריו) יוצא שנשים פסולות בטויית ציצית ,ולשיטת מהר”ם לכאורה כשרות בטויית הציצית דאינו נקרא עשיית החפצה של מצוה כלל. ד .פסק הלכה. איתא בטור (סימן יד) דנשים כשרות בעשיית ציצית וכן הובא להלכה בשלחן ערוך “והאשה כשרה לעשותן” דהיינו כשיטת בעלי התוס’ .והוסיף הרמ”א שם ד”יש מחמירים להצריך אנשים שיעשו אותן ,וטוב לעשות כן לכתחילה” .והרבה מהאחרונים הבינו שיטת הרמ”א שמחמיר כשיטת ר”ת 11.אמנם יש לעיין בזה טובא לפי דיוק לשונו הזהב של הרמ”א .לכאורה אי סבר הרמ”א כשיטת רבינו תם הו”ל להביא “יש אומרים דאשה פסולה בעשיית ציצית ויש לחוש לדבריו” ,דאז משמע שיש שיטה הפוסלת אף בדיעבד וראוי לחוש לכתחילה לשיטה זו .מדכתב הרמ”א ד”יש מחמירים להצריך אנשים שיעשו אותן” משמע דאף השיטה הפוסלת רק פוסלת לכתחילה ולא בדיעבד וכשיטת מהר”ם שהוא רק דין לכתחילה שנשים לא יעשו ,אבל באמת כשר הוא כשנשים עושין אותן ,ומזה הטעם מסיק “טוב לעשות כן לכתחילה” .ובאמת המשנה ברורה (ס”ק ב’) הבין דהרמ”א חשש לשיטת מהר”ם וכמו שהבינו הגהות מימוניות ד”בני ישראל ולא בנות ישראל” ולא לשיטת ר”ת כלל. כתב המג”א שם דלפי דברי הרמ”א שחושש לשיטת המהר”ם יש ליזהר דאנשים יבנו סוכה ולא נשים .ודבריו מובנים רק אם חוששים לשיטת המהר”ם כמו שהבינו הבית יוסף דמיוסד על מי שמחויב בדבר אינו מוציא אחרים ידי חובתן או להבנת הבאה”ל בשיטת ר”ת ,אבל לשאר כל השיטות פשוט דמותרות לבנות סוכה אף לכתחילה. המשנ”ב (ס”ק ד’) כתב שראוי ונכון שאין לקטן להטיל ציצית בבגד של גדול .ולכאורה הוא מחמיר לכתחילה לשיטת רבינו תם דלא כמחבר ודלא כרמ”א דהא כבר הוכחנו שהרמ”א רק מחמיר לשיטת המהר”ם או הגהות מיימוניות ולא לשיטת ר”ת! ואפילו אם רוצה להחמיר באשה  11עיין לדוגמא בפרי מגדים מחצית השקל וביאור הגר”א שם תשרי תשע"ה • TISHREI 5775 Z 172 Y אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON היא הלבישה ,ולא שייך כלל אינו מחוייב בדבר אינו מוציא אחרים? 8והוא קושיא חזקה על שיטת המהר”ם .ועוד הקשה הבית יוסף על שיטת מהר”ם דאם כן שכל שאינו מחויב בדבר אינו יוכל להוציא אחרים ידי חובתן ,למה סוכת גנב”ך כשר ולמה היה מותר לאשת ר’ חנינא בן דוסא להטיל ציצית לצדיקים לעתיד לבא? 9ותירץ הבית יוסף דדין זה הוא רק לכתחילה שאינן יכולות להוציא אחרים ידי חובתן ,אבל בדיעבד שפיר דמי ,ולכן יוצא לשיטת המהר”ם דסוכת גנב”ך כשר רק בדיעבד ולא 10 לכתחילה. בהגהות מיימוניות ביאר שיטת המהר”ם בדרך אחרת קצת .וכתב דנשים פסולות בעשיית ציצית משום דהא דכתיב “בני ישראל ועשו” בענין ציצית ,משמע למעט בנות ישראל (ולא רק למעט עובדי כוכבים כמו שבאמת דרשו חז”ל) ,הרי ההגה”מ דורש דרשה חדשה שלא הזכירו חז”ל בענין ציצית כלל .ועיין מג”א ס”ק ב’ שבאמת הקשה דלכאורה דרשת ההגה”מ נכונה ולמה לא דרשינן כן בש”ס? ועיין ברכי יוסף סימן יד שם דיש טעם למה לא לדרוש כן דהא אין דרשה זו נכונה דהא יש ריבוי “להם” בפסוק שבא לרבות נשים .ועוד דוחה החיד”א שכיון שנשים בכלל הרבה מצוות אינו מסתבר כלל להוציא נשים מציצית שהוא כנגד כל המצוות ,ואינו דומה לפסול נשים משאר דברים שאינן שייכות כלל לנשים .והערוך השלחן (סימן יד סעיף ו’) גם כן דוחה דרשה זו וכתב דרק בקרבנות דרשינן בני ישראל ולא בנות ישראל דמצות כהונה הוא רק בבני אהרן בקרבנות ,ושאר עבודת המקדש הוא רק בזכרי כהונה ,אבל בשאר דברים לא ממעטינן בני ישראל ולא בנות ישראל .ודוגמא לדבר “על כן לא יאכלו בני ישראל את גיד הנשה” ופשוט דנשים גם אסורות בגיד הנשה ,מאחר שאינו ענין לקרבן ועבודת בית המקדש .יהיה איך שיהיה יוצא לפי הבנת הגה”מ בדברי המהר”ם דנשים פסולות בעשיית תפילין מדינא דגמרא ,ופסולות לכתחילה מציצית מדרשת בני ישראל ולא בנות ישראל ,אבל כשרות לכתחילה בעשיית שאר מצוות כמו סוכה שלא נכתב שום דרשה לפסול ,ולכן שפיר דמי להכשיר סוכת גנב”ך .ורק לפי הבנה הראשונה שהבאנו בשיטת מהר”ם שנשים אינם מוציאות אנשים ,יוצא שנשים אינן יכולות לבנות סוכה לכתחילה. ג .נפקא מינה בין השיטות לכאורה יוצא לנו ד’ נפק”מ לדינא בין הני ג’ שיטות: 1.1אם נשים כשרות לכתחילה בבנין סוכה .לפי שיטת התוס’ פשוט דכשרות לבנות סוכה כמו שכשרות בעשיית כל חפצא של מצוה חוץ מתפילין .לפי שיטת רבינו תם הו”ל לפסול וכמו שהבין הבאה”ל בדבריו ,אבל לפי ביאורי החת”ס והאגרו”מ בדברי ר”ת נשים כשרות בבנין  8גם הים של שלמה גיטין סימן סז תמה על דברי המהר”ם בזה ,וכתב וז”ל דעיקר הדבר קאי על ברכות שאם הוא פטור שאינו יכול להוציא את חבירו ותדע סוכת גנב”ך כשרה אע”פ שהיא פטורה מן הסוכה ,ויראה שאף הוא לא הקפיד אלא לכתחילה ולעצמו ,ולא שהיה מוחה בדבר עכ”ל.  9ועיין שו”ת חת”ס יו”ד סוף סימן רעא שכתב וז”ל דס”ל למהר”ם כדעת הר”י שבמרדכי דמייתי בית יוסף דמצות עשה של ציצית אינו אלא להטיל בו ציצית כשילבשנו ולכן לא כתיב לא תלבש בגד בלא ציצית וכו’ וא”כ המצוה כל אחד שיעשה הוא או שלוחו ואשה דפטורה אינה נעשית שליח להוציא המחוייב בדבר והשתא תו לא תקשי מסוכה דכתיב בסוכות תשבו ואין העשייה מהמצוה והא דכתיב חג הסוכות תעשה העשייה קאי אהחג ולא אהסוכה ולא נעלמו דברי הש”ס תעשה לך לשם חובך מ”מ לא משמע פשטיה דקרא דקאי אסוכה כמו בציצית ע”כ נשים פסולות אלא לפי זה קשיא למה לי בני ישראל למעוטי נכרים ,תיפוק ליה דאינו נעשה שליח להוציא? וי”ל דנהי דאשה לא תעשה מ”מ אם עשאה כשרים הציצית ולא עלה להבעלים לשם חובת מצות ציצית אבל מ”מ הבגד נפטר משא”כ גוים עכ”ל .הרי לפי דברי החת”ס כל שיטת המהר”ם נוגע רק לענין ציצית ואינו ענין לעשיית סוכה כלל ודלא כהבנת המרדכי בדבריו.  10ולכאורה אי אפשר לפרש גם כן שיטת רבינו תם שרק פוסל לכתחילה דהא כתב בהגהות מיימוניות פ”א מהלכות ציצית אות ט’ וז”ל וכן היה מעשה בטרוי”ש באשה שהיתה רגילה לתקן ציציות להגדילם בטליתות ופסלם ר”ת מההיא דפרק השולח כל שישנו בקשיה ישנו בכתיבה עכ”ל הרי להדיא שר”ת פסל גם בדיעבד. אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON Z 173 Y  • TISHREI 5775תשרי תשע"ה פסולות בעשיית סוכה וז”ל “עיין במ”ב והוא הטעם של מהר”ם שהובא בהגה”מ ולא העתקתי הטעם משום דהא דר”ת וכדאיתא במ”א משום דכל שאינו בלבישה אינו בעשייה ונ”מ גם ליתר המצות לולב וסוכה משום דמשמע בד”מ שלא חשש רק להמהר”ם וכן בע”ת מצאתי כן א”כ אין להחמיר גם בקטן וכן מצאתי בארה”ח ומ”מ כיון שהפמ”ג ודה”ח העתיקו להלכה ליזהר לכתחלה ע”י קטן ראוי ונכון לעשות כן”. 2.2בבית יוסף (סימן יד) הקשה דהא דאמרינן בפרק אין מעמידין (ע”ז לט ).מעשה באשה אחת שנשאת לחבר והיתה קומעת לו תפילין על ידו ,הרי להדיא שאשה כשרה בקשירת תפילין על בעלה? ותירץ בב’ אופנים .ראשון דאין כוונת הגמרא בע”ז שם שהיתה קושרת התפילין ,אלא שהיתה מסייעה לו לקושרן .שנית ,אפשר דלא אסר לאשה אלא תיקון הדבר כגון כתיבה ותיקון 6 הציצית ואגודת הלולב אבל קשירה לאו תיקון המצוה היא ומציא עבדא. 3.3ומה שהביאו בעלי התוס’ ראיה מאשת ר’ חנינא בן דוסא לכאורה הוא קושיא חזקה על שיטת רבינו תם דפוסל נשים בעשיית ציצית ,וכתב הים של שלמה (גיטין שם פ”ד סימן סז) דשאני אשת ר’ חנינא בן דוסא שנזהרת כל ימיה בציצית ,ועוד אולי כוונת הגמרא הוא שהיא תעשה רק טויית הציצית ולא קשירת הציצת ונשים כשרות בטויית הציצית. 4.4בברכי יוסף (סימן יד אות ב’) הקשה לשיטת ר”ת דנשים פסולות בעשיית ציצית משום דרשת וקשרתם וכתבתם ,והוא הדין בציצית ,לכאורה הו”ל לפסול גוי מאותו טעם שאינו מחוייב במצוה וממילא אי אפשר לו ליצור חפצא של מצוה ,אבל בגמרא (מנחות דף מב) איתא שגוי פסול בעשיית ציצית מדרשה ד”בני ישראל” ולא עובדי כוכבים .ולמה צריך דרשה כזו לפסול גוי מקשירת ציצית מאחר שהוא דבר פשוט על פי דרשת הגמרא שכל שאינו בקשירה אינו בכתיבה? ולכאורה הוא קושיא חזקה על שיטת רבינו תם אם לא תאמר שדרשת “בני ישראל” 7 הוא אסמכתא. •הבית יוסף הביא דעה שלישית בזה ,והוא שיטת מהר”ם דכל שאינו מחוייב בדבר אינו מוציא אחרים ידי חובתן ולכן אשה שאינה מחוייבת במצות ציצית אינו מוציא אנשים במצות ציצית. ועיין בערוך השולחן (סימן יד סעיף ז’) שהקשה על זה דלא שייך לומר כל הפטור מן הדבר אינו פוטר אחרים דזהו במצוה שמוציאו בעשייתו כמו קידוש והבדלה וכיו”ב ,אבל בציצית המצוה מצוות ישיבתו באכילה ושינה בסוכה בחג .אבל החיוב והמצווה ממש שעליו ,אינו כלל על הבניין והסיכוך .שלכן אם איכא סוכה שעשאוה גנב”ך ,שנזדמן שסיככוה בסכך כשר כדין ,ובדפנות כדין ,ושנתנו לו רשות לאכול ולישן שם ,ליכא שום חיסרון .וכן ליכא שום חיסרון בקציצת הלולב מן הדקל לעצם המצווה ,שלכן ליכא שום חיסרון בקציצת נכרים ונשים. אבל על האגד דהלולב ,ועל עשיית ציצית ,שהם רק מעשה מצווה ,שבלא מעשה המצווה לא היה שייך שיעשה זה כלל. שאין שום משמעות ומעלה לחוטי הציצית הקשורים כגדיל וללולב הנאגד מצד עצם מציאותם ,אם לא לצורך מצוותם, ועשיית הגדיל בציצית ,ואגידת הלולב נותנות לציצית ולולב חשיבות רק מצד עשיית המצווה .משא”כ סוכה ושופר ומצה וכדומה ,שהם חפצים בפני עצמם גם ללא המצווה ,ורק מקיימים בהם את המצווה ,ולכן אין לעשייתם חשיבות מצווה. שא”כ בהכרח שאם לולב צריך אגד כרבי יהודה (סוכה ל”ג ע”א) ,דרק על ידי איגודו נעשה ראוי ללקיחה ,הוא ציווי להישראל שיאגוד .ולרבנן דהוא מצוה לנוי ,מקרא דואנוהו הוא נמי וודאי ציווי השייך רק לישראל ,שייך למילף שלא שייך כל ענין זה אלא לישראל החייבין בהמצווה עכ”ל.  6עיין בשערי תשובה סימן יד ס”ק א’ דאין לגוי לסייע ישראל בהנחת תפילין ,משמע דלהלכה נקטינן דפסולות אף אם היא רק מסייעת במעשה מצוה עכ”ל .ולדבריו אין כל מקום כלל בדברי הראשונים להחמיר לנשים שלא לבנות סוכה.  7יש להעיר שהברכי יוסף שם כתב דספר החינוך מצוה שפ”ו כתב דנשים פסולות בעשיית ציצית ,אבל הריטב”א הביא בשם רבו נר”ו נשים כשרות בעשיית ציצית ,וידוע לכל דרבו של הריטב”א הוא הרא”ה ,הרי ראיה מפורשת דלא כתב הרא”ה את ספר החינוך! תשרי תשע"ה • TISHREI 5775 Z 174 Y אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON מקור בש”ס שמדבר על עשיית ציצית על ידי נשים .ורק מצינו בראשונים שמדברים על זה]. •תוס’ (במס’ מנחות דף מב .ד”ה מנין ובגיטין מה( :ד”ה כל) וגם הרא”ש (בגיטין פ”ד שם) סברי דנשים כשרות בעשיית ציצית .ומה שדרשינן שפסולות מתפילין דכל שישנו בקשירה ישנו בכתיבה הוא גזה”כ מיוחדת לענין תפילין 2.ראיה לדבר הביא הרא”ש בגיטין שם פרק ד’ אות מו ממעשה המובא בגמרא בבא בתרא (דף עד ):שלעתיד לבא אשת ר’ חנינא בן דוסא עתידה למשדי בה תכילתא לצדיקי (ר”ל להטיל תכלת בבגדי צדיקים) ,הרי מבואר בהדיא שכשרה בקשירת ציצית 3.ולכאורה אם כשרות לקשור ציצית כשרות גם בעשיית כל שאר חפצה של מ”ע שהז”ג חוץ מתפילין 4.ופשוט לפי דברי התוס’ דנשים כשרות לכתחילה לבנות סוכה. •בניגוד לשיטת התוס’ ,הביאו (התוס’ והרא”ש שם) דמכאן (שאינן בכתיבת תפילין) אומר ר”ת דאין אשה אוגדת לולב ועושה ציצית כיון דלא מיפקדה .הרי לשיטת ר”ת הגמרא בגיטין לענין כתיבת תפילין הוא הכלל ששייך בכל מצוות והוי גילוי מילתא לשאר מצוות התורה .ולכאורה לפי שיטת רבינו תם אין לנשים לבנות סוכה. והרבו המפרשים להקשות על שיטת רבינו תם: 1.1התוס’ הקשו על שיטת ר”ת מסוכת גנב”ך דכשרה ,ולפי שיטת ר”ת אמאי לא פסלינן מטעם דכל שישנו בישיבה ישנו בעשייה וכל שאינו בישיבה אינו בעשייה? והחת”ס (יו”ד סוף סימן רעא) כתב ליישב דרבינו תם פוסל רק בדבר שצריך עשייה לשמה ,משא”כ סוכה דרק בעי לשם צל ולא לשם מצות סוכה 5.אמנם מדברי הבאה”ל סימן יד מבואר דהבין בשיטת ר”ת דנשים 1  1ומעניין מאד שלא מצינו אפילו בראשונים שמדברים על ענין קטנים בעשיית ציצית ,ורק האחרונים העירו על זה .ובאמת הוא פליאה עצומה למה לא דיברו בה הראשונים?!  2ועיין בתוס’ מנחות שם שכתב טעם אחר לחלק בין ציצית לתפילין ,דהיינו שכיון שלא נאמרה מצות לבישה בציצית אין מקום לדרשה דכל שישנו בלבישה ישנו בקשירה  3לכאורה יש לדון טובא בזה דהא כלל נקט בידינו שאין למדין מדברי אגדה ,ולכאורה הגמרא בבא בתרא שם הוא רק דברי אגדה ואינן נאמרין להלכה כלל .וכבר נחלקו האחרונים אם הך כללא דאין למדין מדברי אגדה שייכת רק כשאגדה חולקת על ההלכה או אפילו כשאינו חולק על הלכה כלל  4ועיין עוד בחתם סופר לגיטין שם שהקשה למה לא דרשינן מהפסוק “אשר תכסה בה” שנכתב מיד אחר “גדילים תעשה” שרק מי שחייב בכיסוי ציצית יכול לעשות הציצית? ותירץ דלא דרשינן הכי מאחר דלשון “אשר תכסה בה” הוא רק לשון סיפור דברים בעלמא ולא לשון ציווי.  5ועיין עוד במור וקציעה סימן יד שמיישב שכתב וז”ל ואיכא למידחי דסוכת גנב”ך בסוכה העשויה לשם נשים מיירי ולא שעשאוה נשים גופייהו ואע”ג דקאמר תלמודא דאיצטריך אע”ג דלאו בני חיובא נינהו ע”כ פירושו הוא דלא נפסלינהו משום דלא נעשו לשם בני חיובא ולעולם לא מכשרינו אלא דוקא בעשאוה בני חיובא לשם נשים או בשבילן תדע דהא דומיא דבהמה משמע .ועיין שם מה שתמה על זה על פי גמרא מנחות מב. ועוד עיין שו”ת אגרו”מ או”ח ח”ה סימן מ’ אות ג’ שביאר דאף ר”ת ס”ל דנשים כשרות לכתחילה בבנין הסוכה וכתב וז”ל ולע”ד משמע דאף ר”ת שהוא הפוסל נשים לציצית מטעם דלא מיפקדא בציצית דיליף כל המצוות מתפילין ,דפסולות נשים לכתוב ,מקרא דוקשרתם וכתבתם כל שישנו בקשירה ישנו בכתיבה ,וכתב בתוס’ גיטין דף מ”ה ע”ב ד”ה כל ,מודה דלסכך סוכה מותר אף לכתחילה ע”י אשה .דלכן לא הזכיר רק הא דאין אשה אוגדת לולב ועושה ציצית ,ולא גם דאינה מסככת סוכה ,ולכן לא קשה עליו מסוכת גנב”ך שכשרה שהקשו עליו שם התוס’ .והוא מטעם שאין במעשה הסיכוך עניין עשיית מצווה ,אלא יצירת סוכה שיוכל לקיים בה המצווה .אלא שמצד המציאות כדי שיהיה אפשר לו לקיים  -יש עליו מצווה ,וגם חיוב דלא יהיה עבריין ,לא רק מעשה הסיכוך אלא גם בהליכתו לקצור או לקנות סכך כשר ,ולא רק הסכך אלא גם קרשים לעשות הדפנות .והוא גם מעשה מצווה לעניין החיוב שעליו מוטל קודם החג  -אף שעדיין ליכא מעשה המצווה ממש דהוא הישיבה בה ,מ”מ מוטל עליו חיוב  -לראות שיהיה לו סוכה .ואם א”א לו להשיג ביום אחד ,איכא עליו החיוב אפילו בימים הרבה קודם .והוא כמו כל מצוות התורה שמחוייבין גם לעשות ולקנות שופר אפילו בזמן גדול קודם ר”ה ,אם כשלא ישתדל אז להשיג שופר לא יהיה לו שופר בר”ה .וכן לאפות מצה אם לא יהיה אפשר להשיג סמוך לפסח ,מחוייב להשתדל לאפות מצה אפילו בזמן גדול קודם הפסח .וכן בכל מצוות התורה ,שאיכא חיוב על האדם להשתדל ולהשיג שיהיה לו חפץ המצווה כדי שיוכל לקיים המצווה .ולא גרע סוכה בזה ,שמחוייב לראות שיהיה לו סוכה שיוכל לקיים המצוה בחג .וממילא כשלא יהיה לו סוכה אם לא יסכך בעצמו ,יהיה מחוייב לסכך בעצמו כדי שיהיה לו המציאות לקיים אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON Z 175 Y  • TISHREI 5775תשרי תשע"ה בענין נשים בבנין הסוכה הרב אריה ליבוויץ ה $ נה הלכה מפורשת היא (קידושין דף כט) דנשים פטורות ממצות עשה שהזמן גרמא ,כגון תפילין ,ציצית ,סוכה ,שופר וכדומה .אולם לכאורה עדיין יש לעיין אם ,למרות שהם פטורות, נשים יכולות לעשות ולייצר החפצאות הדרושות למצוות אלו כדי שאחרים יקיימו המ”ע שהז”ג או כדי שהן יקיימו בתורת אינו מצווה ועושה .לדוגמא ,האם אשה כשרה לכתוב תפילין ,או לקשור ציצית או לבנות סוכה? האם מה שאינן מחויבות בדבר ,מעכבת היכולת לעשות וליצור חפצה של מצוה? ובפרט רציתי לברר ענין נשים בבנין הסוכה ואם יש כל מקום להחמיר שלא להניח נשים לבנות סוכה .כדי לברר ענין זה צריכים לעיין בדברי חז”ל וראשונים במצוות מסויימות ולנסות אם שייכים הדברים גם לשאר מצוות עשה שהזמן גרמא. לפום ריהטא ,נראה דאין כל סיבה למנוע לנשים מלעסוק בבנין הסוכה ,דהא איתא בגמרא סוכה דף ח“ :סוכת גנב”ך (דהיינו סוכה שעשאוה גוים ,נשים ,בהמה או כותי) כשר” .הרי מבואר להדיא, ובלי שום חולקים ,דנשים כשרות בבנין הסוכה ,ומסתמא דכשרות אפילו לכתחילה .אמנם כד נעיין במגן אברהם הלכות ציצית (סימן יד ס”ק ג’) נראה דיש מקום לחולים לחלוק וז”ל (בתוך ביאור דעה אחת המובא ברמ”א שם)“ :ולדידהו כל מצות שאין האשה מחויבת בהן כגון לולב וסוכה אינה רשאי לעשות’” .הרי דס”ל שלכתחלה אין להניח לנשים לבנות סוכה .וצ”ע מהיכי תיתי לחלוק על סתמא דגמרא שמכשיר סוכת נשים? א .סוגיות הש”ס. מצינו ענין עשיית חפצה של מצוה על ידי נשים בב’ מקומות בש”ס: 1.1הגמרא במס’ סוכה דף ח :אומרת דסוכת נשים כשרה ובלבד שתהא מסוככת כהלכתה ,דהיינו שעשאה לצל סוכה ולא לצניעותא בעלמא (ולא בעי סוכה הנעשה לשם חג דוקא). 2.2מאידך גיסא מצינו בגמרא גיטין דף מה :לענין כתיבת תפילין ד “כל שישנו בקשירה ישנו בכתיבה”  שרק מי שמחוייב במצות קשירת תפילין יכול לכתוב תפילין ,ומי שאינו חייב בקשירה כגון נשיםדפטורות מתפילין ,פסולות גם בכתיבת תפילין. ויש לעיין בזה ,דלכאורה אם נשים כשרות בעשיית סוכה הו”ל להכשירן גם לעשות ציצית ותפילין וכל שאר חפצי מצוות עשה שהזמן גרמא .ואם דברי הגמרא גיטין נכונים שפסולות מכתיבת תפילין הו”ל לפוסלן גם בעשיית סוכה ,קשירת ציצית ושאר עשיית חפצה של מ”ע שהז”ג .ויש לעיין איך ליישב ב’ סוגיות הללו. ב .שיטות הראשונים בעשיית ציצית. כדי ליישב הסוגיות ולהבין איך יהיה מקום לחלק בין מצוות שונות ראוי לציין ג’ שיטות בראשונים בענין נשים בעשיית ציצת[ .חשוב להדגיש שאף שמצינו סוגיות בש”ס בענין עשיית סוכה ותפילין על ידי נשים, וגם מצינו שהגמרא מנחות דף מב פוסל עכו”ם מעשיית ציצית (מדרשת “בני ישראל” ולא עכו”ם) אין שום תשרי תשע"ה • TISHREI 5775 Z 176 Y אור הצפון • OHR HATZAFON
© Copyright 2025