1 “Interviewing: What, When and If to Disclose” Intro: Geneivas Da’as – being misleading, deceptive, creating a false impression [literally, “stealing someone’s knowledge/mind”] Is there a duty to disclose to a potential employer that certain conflicts may arise between one’s religion and its related lifestyle, on the one hand, and the demands of working at a given job, on the other hand. The largest potential conflicts are typically: 1. Not being able to work on Shabbos and Yom Tov 2. Lifestyle (maintaining time to learn/daven and spend time with family) 3. Kashrus (typically less of a concern, but it depends on the job requirements). There may be other conflicts depending on the job and the requirements of a given position, for example, being required to shave during the three weeks and Sefirah, but we’ll focus on the main areas of conflict. Obviously, one cannot actively misrepresent oneself. The question here is if one must actively disclose information about one’s religious commitments, or is omitting to mention them permissible. In other words, is omitting to disclose also problematic, similar to active misrepresentation, or is failing to disclose permissible. ואפילו דעת גוי,אסור לגנוב דעת הבריות [Actively misrepresenting oneself, on a resume, during an interview, or otherwise, is absolutely and obviously forbidden. Accordingly, the focus of this topic is “geneivas daas”, which is a more common question when it comes to interviewing - in particular, need we actively disclose information regarding one’s observance, work history, etc.] א,חולין צד .' וכו, ואפילו דעתו של עובד כוכבים, אסור לגנוב דעת הבריות: אמר שמואל.1 (רמב"ם הלכות מכירה )פרק יח הלכה א ואחד עובד כוכבים ואחד ישראל שוים, אסור לרמות את בני אדם במקח וממכר או לגנוב את דעתם.2 . ואפילו לגנוב דעת הבריות בדברים אסור, היה יודע שיש בממכרו מום יודיעו ללוקח.בדבר זה 2 שולחן ערוך )חושן משפט סימן רכח סעיף ו( .3אסור לרמות בני אדם במקח וממכר או לגנוב דעתם ,כגון אם יש מום במקחו צריך להודיעו ללוקח. אף אם הוא עובד כוכבים ,לא ימכור לו בשר נבילה בחזקת שחוטה .ואף לגנוב דעת הבריות בדברים, שמראה שעושה בשבילו ,ואינו עושה ,אסור .כיצד ,וכו'. תוקף איסור גניבת דעת ספר יראים )סימן קכד( .4גונב דעת הבריות במידי דממון הוי בכלל ממון ועובר על "לא תגנובו" )ויקרא יט( .כדתניא בתוספתא ומייתי לה בחולין )צד ,א( ג' גנבים הן ,הראשון שבכולם גונב דעת הבריות ,וכו' .ואין לומר שאיסור גניבת דעת במידי דממון דרבנן שהרי מצינו שנענש אבשלום עליו בסוטה )ט ,ב( תנן לפי שגנב ג' גניבות ,לב אביו ולב ב"ד ולב כל ישראל נתקעו בו ג' שבטים ,עיין שם. חידושי הריטב"א )שם( .5איסור גניבת דעתו של נכרי כתבו קצת רבותינו בשם בעלי התוספות ז"ל שהוא איסור תורה דנפקא לן מדכתיב "לא תגנבו ולא תכחשו" וכו' .ובתוספתא דבבא קמא )פ"ז ה"ג עיי"ש( איתא שלשה גנבים הם ,גדול שבכולם גונב דעת הבריות. ]אך ,יש שכתבו שאיסור גניבת דעת אינו אלא מדרבנן[: ספר מצוות קטן )מצוה רסב( .6שלא לגנוב ממון דכתיב )ויקרא י"ט( לא תגנובו ,וכו' ,ויש גניבה אחרת שאסרו חכמים כגון גניבת הדעת אסור ואפילו דעתו של עכו"ם אסור. וכן כתב הב"ח )חושן משפט סימן רכח( דהגורם דמחזיק לו טובה בחנם אסור מדרבנן. אפילו מלה אחת של גניבת דעת אסורה רמב"ם הלכות דעות פרק ב הלכה ו .7אסור לגנוב דעת הבריות ואפילו דעת הנכרי ,כיצד ,וכו' ,ואפילו מלה אחת של פיתוי ושל גניבת דעת אסור ,אלא שפת אמת ורוח נכון ולב טהור מכל עמל והוות. ספר שערי תשובה לרבינו יונה )שער ג סימן קפד( .8אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה )חולין צד ,א( :אסור לגנוב דעת הבריות ואפילו דעת נכרי .והנה החטא הזה חמור אצל חכמי ישראל יותר מגזל הנכרי ,יען וביען כי שפת שקר אשמה רבה ,ונתחייבנו על גדרי האמת ,כי הוא מיסודי הנפש. באיסור גניבת תשובות לשאלות מבחני הסיום שעושה המדינה שו"ת אגרות משה )חושן משפט חלק ב סימן ל( .9הנה בדבר שאלתו על מה ששמע שבישיבות מתירין להתלמידים לגנוב את התשובות להשאלות במבחני הסיום שעושה המדינה )רידזענס( כדי להונות ולקבל את התעודות שגמרו בטוב 3 ][Rav Moshe responded that three serious prohibitions are being transgressed ] [1#הנה דבר זה אסור לא רק מדינא דמלכותא אלא מדין התורה [2#] ,ואין זה רק גניבת דעת שג"כ אסור כדאמר שמואל בחולין צד ,א שאסור לגנוב דעת הבריות ואפילו דעתו של עכו"ם וכ"ש הכא שהוא גניבת דעת לכולי עלמא אף לישראל [3#] ,אלא דהוא גם גניבת דבר ממש דהא כשירצה לפרנסתו במשך הזמן להשכיר עצמו אצל אחד לעבוד בעסקיו ורוצים ברוב הפעמים במי שגמר היטב למודיו דחול והוא יראה לו התעודה איך שגמר בטוב ועל סמך זה קבלוהו שזהו גניבת ממון ממש. .10ואין לו לטעון ולומר שאף אם קבלוהו לעבוד אצלו אדעתא דהכי הוא כמקפיד על דבר שאינו צריך שרשאי לשקר: ] [1#חדא דאף אם הוא אמת שאין להקפיד הוא ודאי קפידא ובטלה קבלתו. ] [2#וגם שאסור לשקר בכל אופן אף שאינו נוגע לשום דבר דאינו מהתלת מילי דרשאי לשנות )בב"מ כג ,ב(. ] [3#וגם אם ידע שהוא משקר לא היה סומך עליו בכלום ויגרום שיחשוד לאחר כשיחסר איזה דבר דאותו לא יחשוד מחמת שלמד בישיבה ומחזיק לת"ח ואיש נאמן ויסלק להאחר ממשרתו אף שהאמת שהאחר לא לקח ,ואם היה יודע שזה שלמד בישיבה שיקר לו לא היה בטוח לסלק את האחר. ] [4#ועוד דכאן שמקפידין אינשי ודאי שייך להקפיד דיש ודאי דברים דמי שהוא בקי בלמודי חול הוא יותר יודע בעניני עסקי פרנסה ממשא ומתן וממילא ודאי אסור אף למחשבתו שירויח עי"ז בלמוד התורה ,שגם בשביל למוד התורה אסור לגנוב .ואם חשקה נפשו בתורה אין לו לדאוג שמא לא ידע כל כך ולא יהיה לו סימן טוב עלייהו .אבל האמת שאין בזה ענין בטול תורה דמאחר שהולך ללמוד למודי חול הוא רק עצלות בעלמא כשלומד באופן שלא לידע ,כי הזמן הוא עכ"פ מבטל ,ואדרבה מתרגל שלא לידע מה שלומד ומתרגל לעצלות. .11אבל ברור שעצם הדבר ששמע מע"כ הוא שקר משונאי הישיבות ומאלו שרוצים להחריב הישיבות ולהעליל עלילות ברשע ,כי אדרבה ידוע שבני הישיבה הם מאלו שאף בלמודי חול עדיפי מתלמידים שלומדים בבתי ספר שלהם ,ואל יחוש להשמועות של שקר אף שהיה נכתב זה בעתון מפורסם לשונא תורה ויראי ה' ויכול מע"כ לומר בפה מלא שהוא שקר וכזב משונאי תורה ודת ישראל. WHAT’S A GOOD STANDARD FOR WHAT TO DISCLOSE ספר חסידים )סימן תקז( [1#] .12לא יכסה אדם מום בני ביתו ,אם צריכים בניו או קרוביו להזדווג אם יש להם חולי שאילו היו יודעים אותם המזדווגים עמהם אותו חולי לא היו מזדווגים יגלה להם פן יאמרו קדושי טעות היו אלא יפרידם ולא יהיו ברע יחדיו [2#] ,או אם יש מעשים רעים להם שאילו היו יודעים לא היו מתחתנים בהם לכך יפרסם [3#] .וכן לענין צדקה שאם היו יודעים לא היו נותנים להם הרבה יגיד לנותנים. WHAT IF HE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN שולחן ערוך )חושן משפט הלכות אונאה ומקח טעות סימן רכח סעיף ו( .13אסור לרמות בני אדם במקח וממכר או לגנוב דעתם ,כגון אם יש מום במקחו צריך להודיעו ללוקח .אף אם הוא עובד כוכבים ,לא ימכור לו בשר נבילה בחזקת שחוטה .ואף לגנוב דעת הבריות בדברים ,שמראה שעושה בשבילו ,ואינו עושה ,אסור .כיצד ,לא יסרהב )בחבירו( שיסעוד עמו ,והוא יודע שאינו סועד ,ולא ירבה לו בתקרובת והוא יודע שאינו מקבל ,ולא יפתח חביות הפתוחות לחנוני, וזה סובר שפתחם בשבילו ,אלא צריך להודיעו שלא פתחם בשבילו .ואם הוא דבר דאי בעי ליה לאסוקי אדעתיה שאינו עושה בשבילו ,ומטעה עצמו שסובר שעושה בשבילו לכבודו ,כגון שפגע בחבירו בדרך וסבור זה שיצא לקראתו לכבדו ,אין צריך להודיעו. 4 שו"ת אגרות משה )יורה דעה חלק א סימן ל( .14בדבר כבדים ששקעו הקצבים בדם כדי שיתראו יפים. בדבר הכבדים שהקצבים משקעין אותם בדם איזה שעות כדי שיתראו יפים נלע"ד פשוט שאין בזה שום חשש דהא דרכו בהדחה קודם הצליה משום דם בעין שעליו שכן נהגו כדאיתא ברמ"א )יו"ד סי' ע"ו סעי' ב'( כשיטת הראשונים שהביא הר"ן בחולין דף ח' .ואף שבדיעבד מותר גם בלא הדחה ,מ"מ ודאי דרכו בהדחה דכל אדם דרכו לעשות כדין הצריך לכתחלה .והא אף בדרכו להדיח לטעם בעלמא שלא משום חשש איסור נמי נחשב דרכו להדיח כמפורש באו"ח סי' תמ"ז סעי' ה' עיין שם בט"ז סק"ט ובח"י ס"ק כ"ב .וכיון שדרכו להדיח אין שום חשש בזה שמשקעין אותו בדם שגם על דם אחר שעליו א"צ יותר מהדחה שצריך לעשות לסתם כבד מעצם הדם בעין שעליו ,דרק בשמנונית ודוחקא דסכינא צריך שפשוף כדאיתא בחו"ד סי' צ"א סק"א בשם הרשב"א] .עיין שם המשך דבריו[. ולכן אין בזה שום חשש איסור ואף לכתחלה מצד דיני איסור והיתר ,אלא אסור להשקיע בדם מצד איסור אונאה אם אין יודע הלוקח מזה ולא ידוע שעושין כן המוכרין. שו"ת אגרות משה יורה דעה חלק א סימן לא להנ"ל עוד בענין הנ"ל. .... .15וא"כ אדרבה זה שדם מאוס ושקוץ לכל אדם עושה שלא יהיה שום חשש דודאי אף העוברות על דת מדיחות הבשר והכבד שלא ישאר עליהם שום דם בעין מצד מאיסותא וכדבארתי והוכחתי לעיל, וא"כ אין מכשילין בזה שמשקיעין בדם אף לא לבעלי עבירה .וממילא מובן שלא שייך לכאן הא דאסור למכור דמאי לע"ה דודאי אסור להכשיל באיסורין בידים אף לרשעים ואף לעכו"ם במה שמצוין וכל הפלפולים הם למותר בזה אך הכא אין כאן שום מכשול כיון שדרכו בהדחה. ומה שכתב הגר"י קאנאוויץ שיש כאן איסור גזל מחמת שהדם מכביד כמו בשובר מפרקתה ,לא מובן כלל הא התם הדם נבלע באברים ואינו נראה להקונים אבל הכא שהדם הוא על הבשר שצונן בצונן לא נבלע כלום א"כ הוא דבר הנראה להקונה שמותר כמפורש בסוף הזהב שר' אחא מתיר בדבר הנטעם ובדבר הנראה ואיפסק כדבריו בכל הפוסקים .ובאמת אף אבא שאול לא פליג אלא התם שאינו כ"כ דבר הנראה שיש שאין יכולין לשער מראייתן וגם בנטעם שיש שפליגי הוא משום שיש שאין מבינים כ"כ אבל בדבר הנראה ממש כגון באם יש שם דם בעין גם אבא שאול מודה ,וא"כ מצד משקל הדם שע"ג הכבד אין כאן חשש גזל ומותר לכו"ע .ומהתימה איך כתב שאין נפקותא אם הדם מכביד בתוך הבשר או על הבשר שודאי על הבשר שאני ומותר כמפורש בגמ' ובכל הפוסקים. ... .16וא"כ גם הכבדים שנשתקעו בדם לא נשתנה מראיתם למראה המוכיח בדוקא שמקרוב נשחטו אלא שנסתלקו רק ממראה המוכיח בדוקא שמכבר נשחטו לסתם מראה שאין מראיתו מוכיח כלום ועדין יש לו להקונה להסתפק שמא מכבר נשחטו ולשאול אותו ולעשות חקירה ודרישה וכשלא שאל מחמת שטעה לחשוב שמקרוב נשחט איהו הוא דקא מטעי נפשיה ומותר ,ואף שהוא גרם לזה שיטעה בעצמו ,כמו בהא דחולין וכמו בסחיפת כפלי שמותר מצד איסור אונאה וגניבת דעת. ולכן אין יכולין למחות ביד המוכרי כבדים אף לא מצד איסורי ממון כיון שיותר נוטה שאין בכאן איסור אונאה והרבנים המשגיחים שחותמין על הכבדים עושין כדין וכדת שאין בהכשרם אף פקפוק כל דהו. ?May I keep the skeletons in the closet Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff ?WHAT MAY ONE HIDE ?]17. What type of information may one withhold [in the context of Shiduchim 5 KNOWN INFORMATION 18. It is halachically deceitful for a seller to withhold important information that the buyer cannot find out on his own. The seller is not required, however, to disclose a problem that the buyer could discover. Furthermore, as long as the buyer could have noticed something that may arouse attention, there is no geneivas daas and no onaah in making the sale (Shu"t Igros Moshe, Yoreh Deah 1:31). For example, if someone is selling a house with a drop ceiling, he is not required to notify the buyer that there was damage above the ceiling, since a drop ceiling in a residence should arouse attention. Similarly, if the entire neighborhood is susceptible to flooding basements, the seller does not need to mention that his basement has a severe water problem. If the buyer asks directly, the seller must answer honestly (Shu"t Igros Moshe, Yoreh Deah 1:31). A similar concept is true concerning shidduchim. For example, if the scandalous activities of a family member are well known in one’s hometown, one need not tell the other party since this information could be discovered by asking around (Shu"t Panim Meiros 1:35). Halachically, when the other party asks neighbors for information about this potential shidduch, the neighbors should share the requested details. This is a topic I hope to discuss more fully in a future article. INSIGNIFICANT INFORMATION 19. A second category of information that need not be revealed includes factors that are insignificant to the buyer. One is not required to provide an in-depth list of every shortcoming the merchandise has. Similarly, shidduchim do not require revealing every possible medical or yichus issue. The Chofetz Chaim distinguishes between a medical issue one must reveal and a "weakness," which one need not. Thus, someone need not reveal minor ailments that would not disturb the average person. Although I know rabbonim who disagree with this position, I feel that juvenile diabetes is a malady that must be mentioned, whereas hay fever and similar allergies may be ignored. If one is uncertain whether a specific medical issue is significant enough to mention, one should ask a shaylah. My usual litmus test is: If the issue is significant enough that one might want to hide it, it is usually something that one should tell. 6 Frum in the Workplace Topic: what (and when) to disclose while interviewing 1. Question: I started giving a shiur on the issues involved with being Frum in the workplace, and was asked by a few of the attendees how much (if anything) should be disclosed at an interview or before taking a job about one’s being observant. In particular (by way of example), if the job is demanding hours-wise, should one be up-front about not being able to work on Shabbos and Yom Tov? About Kashrut? Etc. The question is how much to disclose (if anything) and when. I would love your input on this. Thank you! Responses: 2. Three categories Anonymous Like most things it's a matter of common sense. But I'd think of 3 categories: 1-[a.] place which has [frum] people already (eg, large law firm): don't see any point in raising anything. Similarly, [b.] any place where u interview w/ a yarmulke or [c.] your resume is reasonably obvious to the interviewer, I'd say no need. 2-place which might not be familiar w/ the concept but is large enough to accommodate (ie, the basic legal requirement: "can be reasonably accommodated")--here i think u mention after offer. (Shabbos that is/kashrus should be irrelevant unless job is a food critic or chef....). 3-place where it can't work (eg tiny staff/7 day a week)—don’t interview [explanation – category 1 – if there are frum people working there already, the company/firm is able to accommodate and there’s no reason to disclose. If one wears a kippa or it’s clear from the resume that the person is frum, either of those fulfill your disclosure requirement of your being frum and there’s no geneivas daas.] [(]וכן מבואר משולחן ערוך )חושן משפט הלכות אונאה ומקח טעות סימן רכח סעיף ו Rabbi Yitzchok Aderstein 3. I don't think there are any requirements to disclose, other than avoiding both sheker and geneivas da'as. OTOH, it remains an open question as to what is the best policy. Getting the job and then having to deal with hostility later is not a great place to be. Most candidates I have known - at least in law firms - have wanted to be up front for that reason. At a different type of job, where you are not going to have to deal with the interviewer later, 7 and they really are going to have to make the reasonable accommodation required by law, you can afford to just answer the direct questions directly and not offer more than asked for. Being sensitive to the relationship being created Avi Steinlauf 4. Good to hear from you. All is well out here and I trust the same is true with you. Re your question I’m usually a proponent of being upfront on issues like this so as not to create any ill will down the road (ie. a feeling that info was deliberately withheld). Obviously a cogent argument could be made either way and the answer depends heavily on the situation. In my experience, 9 times out of 10 times, if information is withheld that the interviewer would have wanted to know, then the work relationship tends to start off on the wrong foot, the requisite trust is lacking, and it leads to separation. [(]וכן מבואר מספר חסידים )סימן תקז Timing of the disclosure 5. May I keep the skeletons in the closet? Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff WHEN TO TELL [in the context of Shiduchium]? In most instances, there is no requirement to notify the other party or a shadchan of any of these blemishes at the time a shidduch is suggested. The Sefer Chassidim, quoted above, does not mention at what point one must notify the other party of the shortcoming. Many contemporary poskim contend that one should reveal this information after the couple has met a few times; about the time the relationship is beginning to get serious. There is no requirement for the parties to tell a shadchan. However, if one knows that the other party will reject the shidduch because of this blemish, I would recommend forgoing this shidduch from the outset. For example, if one knows that a particular family prides itself on a pure pedigree, don’t pursue a shidduch with them if you know they will ultimately reject it when they discover that your greatuncle was not observant. Jeff Kupietzky 6. My advice is not to bring up kashrut or shabbas during the interviews but once you have the job offer it's recommended before accepting to explain constraints. The only exception are roles that need shabbat or holiday commits (say a trader or er doctor). Generally, people will tolerate any request if it's reasonable, consistent and the person makes up for it in dedication elsewhere (I.e., I would not suggest someone asking for holidays off and then say they can't cover sunday or work late). Let me know if I can help further. Jeff 8 Simon Wolf 7. Here are my quick thoughts. If you would like, we can speak personally in order to flesh out these ideas. I think disclosure in an interview has to be viewed on two planes. One is the person's rights under the law and the other is the relationship being established with the future employer. Under American law, it is illegal for an employer to consider a person's gender, religion, age and etc. as part of their determination of the applicant's qualifications for a job. From this standpoint, there is no obligation by the interviewee to disclose their religion or religious beliefs and it would be illegal for the interviewer to ask the applicant about these issues. I think this initial stage is very important since it allows the candidate to be judged solely on their qualifications without regard to their religion and religious practices. It prevents preconceived notions of the future employer from biasing their assessment and opens opportunities to the candidate that might have otherwise been closed to them. 8. The timing of the next step is sensitive and subjective and needs to be assessed on an individual and situation basis. Once the interviewee has been selected as the potential candidate or they have reached a point in the negotiations where it is clear that they are the preferred candidate (or maybe even right before they sign), I think it is important to have a frank discussion with the future employer about one's religious practices and how they will impact on the employee's ability to carry out their job. I think this step is important for a number of reasons. [#1] In the end all employment situations involve a relationship (hopefully long term) and therefore the building of trust is essential to the start and long-term success of such a relationship. A disclosure of one's religious practices (that will inevitably affect their job) is significant in establishing a rapport and understanding between the employer and employee. To omit such information, can unnecessarily sour the relationship or lead to misunderstandings of expectations or availability. While this first reason is somewhat more intangible, the next reason is much more practical and tangible. [#2] It is important for both the employee and employer to understand the scope of the job and the ability of the applicant to complete such a job. The potential employee might realize through such a frank discussion that it won't be in their best interests to take such a job. It is possible that the candidate didn't consider or properly assess the difficulties or lifestyle effects that such a job entails. (When asked, I always tell people that being a shomer Shabbat Jew in the workplace is very doable. The proper question a religious Jew must ask of themselves is whether they can pray (with a minyan) three times a day, learn Torah daily, bring up a family and be shomer Shabbat while holding down a particular job.) On the other hand, it is also important that the employer understands how the potential employee will be able to accomplish their tasks despite their religious observance. The candidate needs to assuage the future employer's fears of hiring such a religious individual or somehow address their preconceived notions about such an individual. The candidate should if necessary present a case of why despite these limitations that they are a more qualified candidate (the employee will work additional time to compensate for the missed time because of religious needs, the employee can 9 work on other's holidays or the candidate's past experience or skill set allow them to perform at or better than competing candidates despite the religious "handicap"). [#3] The last reason for such a disclosure is that a religious Jew should be operating in the world under the Torah's guideline of ועשית הישר והטוב. This means that their behavior should wherever possible be above reproach and their actions should be a 'קידוש הwhich includes sometimes going beyond the letter of the law to be נמצא חן בעיני אלקים ואדם. I hope that helps you Kol Tuv How to Break the News…. Aviad Goldvicht 9. This is a very common question we had (in YU business school) when we started working. The answer is not the same for all and is dependant on different types of jobs. However, the main line of thinking (in my opinion) is the following: Firstly, corporations and institutions really respect religious people in general because they are usually more ethical and committed in their personal life and they believe that they will behave the same in the work place and that they have priorities in life. In regards to interviews if we are talking about NYC everyone know what Jews are... and in general there is no work over the weekends even for gentiles (except investment bankers, lawyers and the alike) therefore it won't be an issue but in places which aren't that aware of Jewish customs I think a person should bring it up in a indirect way that they are Jewish (i.e I went to this school... or yeshiva...or I volunteer here..) that way he can at least let them know indirectly. 10. In regards to working hours a person should inquire whether they can work over time during the week to make up for weekend work hours if the job requires. Most places don't mind as long as the job is done. however, a person (yeshiva boy) has to realize that his day to day life is going to be very hectic in order to obtain such a job and that's a personal choice. I believe that if a person comes to an interview and starts rattling off that I can't work on this day and on that day and the weekends are out his chances of getting the job are close to zero especially when there are other candidates that don't have this issue. Rather one should explain in short that he/she is very dedicated and will do what it takes to get the job done but they are religious and that is their priority in life and therefore won't be able to work 12 hours in a week (assuming the guy works 12 hour days) but will make it up. Kashtrut has never been an issue for me personally, i worked in firms with only gentiles i was the only Jewish guy and they had parties and birthdays etc... and you always can respectfully say that either you ate already or on a diet or simply explain to them that I only eat Kosher - funny enough people thought that it was very cool and usually like to hear more about it. In my case the next event they had they ordered kosher. 10 in regards for working for a non Jewish Boss that asks you to go to McDonald's and pick up lunch for him reb Moshe has a whole Psak on it that explains how one should handle such a case. Hope this helps, all the best. Rabbi Gershon Bess 11. Hi! In the USA it is illegal to fire or not hire because of religious reasons unless it doesn’t work for such a job. So if it won’t work, of course you have to tell. If it can work, if there is no contract, then according to halacha he can fire you at any time so it will be their decision whether to fire. If the person will get stuck [because of the law] it would seem to not be permitted because you are duping him if the understanding was that the person would be available. B’kitzur, this is very hard shailoh. The next time that you are by Rav elyahsiv, ask him. Or ask a rav Nussbaum from Rav Yaakov Hillel’s kollel 11 19 cheshvan 5769 May I keep the skeletons in the closet? Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff Dedicated to the memory of Rachel bat Yakot Question: Mrs. Weiss (not her real name) called me to discuss the following sensitive matter: "I was once treated successfully for a serious disease. My grandmother had the same illness, yet lived in good health to a ripe old age. The doctors feel that my daughter should be checked regularly from a fairly young age for this same disease. She is now entering the shidduchim parsha. Must I reveal this family information to shadchanim and/or to the families of potential chassanim, and, if so, at what point must I disclose this information? I am truly concerned that this could seriously complicate her shidduch possibilities." We all have medical, personal, and/or genealogical issues we want to keep private. What information must we reveal about ourselves while arranging shidduchim for our children (or for ourselves)? And at what point must we disclose it? Obviously, each individual must ask his or her own halachic authority how to proceed, as one should do with all shaylos. This article is to explain the halachic issues, so that we can present our shaylos in a clearer way. What halachic issues are involved? Before we analyze these cases, we need to elucidate several halachic areas. We can divide the questions into three subtopics: I. Emes – Honesty II. Geneivas daas – Misleading someone III. Onaah – Fraud I. EMES – HONESTY A person must maintain total integrity in all his dealings – after all, the Torah commands us to emulate Hashem in all our deeds – and His seal is truth (Shabbos 55a). Someone who is meticulously honest will merit receiving the presence of the Shechinah (see Sotah 42a). One certainly may not be untruthful without any reason and may certainly not do so when it deceives or causes someone personal or financial harm. For example, 12 one may not deny having damaged someone else’s property. Similarly, a person may not blame fictitious excess traffic for a tardy arrival at work when he just left home too late. For the same reason, one may not deceive someone about a shidduch by misinforming the other party. I will explain the details of this halacha shortly. HONESTY IS NOT ALWAYS THE BEST POLICY Notwithstanding the responsibility to be straightforward, there are specific situations where the Torah advises one to be imprecise. For example, it is more important to avoid (1) creating machlokes, (2) embarrassing someone, or (3) hurting a person’s feelings or reputation than it is to disclose the entire truth (Bava Metzia 23b, with Rif and Tosafos). In situations where a full exposé may lead to one of these negative results, one should omit the detrimental information, although it is preferable to avoid fabricating a story (see Chofetz Chaim, Hilchos Rechilus 1:8). If there is no choice, it is even preferable to fabricate a story rather than embarrass someone or hurt his feelings or reputation. If machlokes may result if one answers candidly, one must modify the truth, rather than create ill feeling (Yevamos 65b). Similarly, if I am asked about someone’s personal habits, I may modify my answer if the truth might reveal private information the person might not want divulged (Maharal, Bava Metzia 23b). II. GENEIVAS DAAS – MISLEADING SOMEONE Geneivas daas, literally, "stealing a mind," means creating a false impression – that is, deluding another person’s perception of reality. The Gemara rules "Asur lignov daas habriyos, It is prohibited to steal someone’s mind" (Chullin 94a). One example of this is someone who acts as a big tzaddik in front of people but is less halachically meticulous in private (Tosafos, Bechoros 31a, s.v. ika). This unwarranted display of righteousness is a form of deception. Another example is a gentile who asked his Jewish landlord to place a mezuzah on his door; Rav Moshe Feinstein prohibited placing an invalid mezuzah on the door because of geneivas daas (Shu"t Igros Moshe, Yoreh Deah 1:184). A different type of geneivas daas is misleading someone to feel indebted when it is unwarranted. An example of this is begging someone to join you for a meal when you know he will not accept (Chullin 94a, as explained by Orach Meisharim 24:5) -- the invited party feels obligated to reciprocate. Geneivas daas can happen in shidduch situations as well, such as by implying that one intends to provide financial support when he/she has no intention or 13 ability to do so, or by presenting a bochur as a big masmid or talmid chacham when he is not (see Shu"t Chasam Sofer, Even HaEzer 82). III. ONAAH -- FRAUD Misrepresenting a product or service in order to make a sale is a form of cheating, such as painting an item to hide a defect. A modern instance of onaah is insider trading, purchasing or selling a stock or commodity based on information that is unavailable to the public. This is forbidden unless one notifies the other party of this information. In shidduchim the same rule is true: Subject to some exceptions, which I will explain shortly, one must notify the other party of information that might be of concern. I will refer to this information as "blemishes," although they are not blemishes in the usual sense. MEKACH TA’US – INVALIDATING THE MARRIAGE The most serious ramification of withholding required information about shidduchim, or worse, of being deceptive, is that this can even result (in certain extreme cases) in a halachically invalid marriage. (This indeed applies to any contracted arrangement – an unrevealed serious blemish brings about a mekach ta’us, because the two parties never agreed to the arrangement as it indeed exists.) Here are a few interesting examples: If someone specifies that his new wife should have no vows (nedarim) and finds that she is bound by neder to abstain from meat, wine, or nice clothes, the kiddushin is annulled (Kesubos 72b)! A husband wants his wife to enjoy life, and refraining from these activities may disturb the happiness of their marriage. OTHER SERIOUS BLEMISHES To quote the words of the Sefer Chassidim, "When arranging matches for your children or other family members, do not hide medical issues from the other party to which they would object enough to decline the shidduch, lest they afterward choose to annul the marriage. You should also tell them about deficiencies in halachic observances that are significant enough that the other party would have rejected the marriage (#507)." CAN’T SMELL Another example of unrevealed information that invalidates a marriage is a woman’s failure to notify her future husband that she has no sense of smell, since this flaw hampers her ability to prepare tasty meals. Similarly, a profession 14 that causes a man’s body to have a foul odor is sufficient reason to invalidate the marriage (Kesubos 76a). Withholding information concerning an inability to have children is certainly a mekach ta’us. In this last situation, a physician who is aware that his patient cannot have children is required to reveal this information to the other side, even though this violates patient confidentiality (Shu"t Tzitz Eliezer 16:4). WHEN TO TELL? In most instances, there is no requirement to notify the other party or a shadchan of any of these blemishes at the time a shidduch is suggested. The Sefer Chassidim, quoted above, does not mention at what point one must notify the other party of the shortcoming. Many contemporary poskim contend that one should reveal this information after the couple has met a few times; about the time the relationship is beginning to get serious. There is no requirement for the parties to tell a shadchan. However, if one knows that the other party will reject the shidduch because of this blemish, I would recommend forgoing this shidduch from the outset. For example, if one knows that a particular family prides itself on a pure pedigree, don’t pursue a shidduch with them if you know they will ultimately reject it when they discover that your great-uncle was not observant. WHAT MAY ONE HIDE? What type of information may one withhold? KNOWN INFORMATION It is halachically deceitful for a seller to withhold important information that the buyer cannot find out on his own. The seller is not required, however, to disclose a problem that the buyer could discover. Furthermore, as long as the buyer could have noticed something that may arouse attention, there is no geneivas daas and no onaah in making the sale (Shu"t Igros Moshe, Yoreh Deah 1:31). For example, if someone is selling a house with a drop ceiling, he is not required to notify the buyer that there was damage above the ceiling, since a drop ceiling in a residence should arouse attention. Similarly, if the entire neighborhood is susceptible to flooding basements, the seller does not need to mention that his basement has a severe water problem. If the buyer asks directly, the seller must answer honestly (Shu"t Igros Moshe, Yoreh Deah 1:31). A similar concept is true concerning shidduchim. For example, if the scandalous activities of a family member are well known in one’s hometown, one need not tell the other party since this information could be discovered by asking around 15 (Shu"t Panim Meiros 1:35). Halachically, when the other party asks neighbors for information about this potential shidduch, the neighbors should share the requested details. This is a topic I hope to discuss more fully in a future article. INSIGNIFICANT INFORMATION A second category of information that need not be revealed includes factors that are insignificant to the buyer. One is not required to provide an in-depth list of every shortcoming the merchandise has. Similarly, shidduchim do not require revealing every possible medical or yichus issue. The Chofetz Chaim distinguishes between a medical issue one must reveal and a "weakness," which one need not. Thus, someone need not reveal minor ailments that would not disturb the average person. Although I know rabbonim who disagree with this position, I feel that juvenile diabetes is a malady that must be mentioned, whereas hay fever and similar allergies may be ignored. If one is uncertain whether a specific medical issue is significant enough to mention, one should ask a shaylah. My usual litmus test is: If the issue is significant enough that one might want to hide it, it is usually something that one should tell. At this point, we can discuss Mrs. Weiss’ shaylah asked above: "I was once treated successfully for a serious disease. My grandmother had the same illness, yet lived in good health to a ripe old age. The doctors feel that my daughter should be checked regularly from a fairly young age for this same disease. She is now entering the shidduchim parsha. Must I reveal this family information to shadchanim and/or to the families of potential chassanim, and, if so, at what point must I disclose this information? I am truly concerned that this could seriously complicate her shidduch possibilities." If you have the same or a similar question, I refer you to your own rov. Most poskim with whom I discussed the shaylah contended that one should reveal this information to the other side after the couple has gotten to know one another and is interested in pursuing the relationship. One rov disagreed. He contended that since the problem can be caught early and treated successfully, one need not divulge this information at all. All opinions agree that one has absolutely no obligation to mention this information to a shadchan. Almost all of us have shaylos regarding what we are required or not required to disclose about shidduchim. May we all have only nachas from our children and their families!
© Copyright 2024