Consulting Performance, Reward, and Talent Consulting po rt Performance, Reward, and Talent Global Salary Planning Report Sa mp le Re 2012–2013 Proprietary & Confidential | Legal Disclaimer rt Table of Contents 1 Global Salary Increase Survey Report Availability Overview of Survey Results 4 6 Promotional and Salary Structure Movement Global Broad-Based Short-Term Incentives Re Global Broad-Based Long-Term Incentives Global Sales Compensation po Survey Highlights and Insights 9 11 15 18 Rewarding and Retaining High-Performing Employees 21 Macroeconomic Indicators 23 Appendix Definitions and Terms 26 29 Sa mp le Number of Participants per Country 25 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report i rt Survey Highlights and Insights Sa mp le Re po This report presents the results of the 25th annual Global Salary Increase Survey conducted by Aon Hewitt. The survey focuses on overall changes in employee compensation for the calendar year 2012, and on current projections for 2013. The survey spans over 100 markets with 14,165 country submissions received during July and August. Participants include service, manufacturing, and multiindustry organizations. 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 1 rt Survey Highlights and Insights po How Data is Collected The survey data is collected through multinationals that submit multicountry data and also from companies that are recruited locally and submit data for one single country. The salary increase budget information reported in this report encompasses data for all companies. The compensation practices section includes short- and long-term incentive variable pay, global sales compensation, and rewarding and retaining high-performing employees. This section only includes information of those companies reporting global compensation policies. Re Nearly 600 companies submitted data for more than one country. The average number of submissions was 17. Key Insights Economic and political global uncertainty is casting a pall over the compensation budgeting process for 2012. Organizations continue to remain apprehensive about increasing their fixed costs. Overall net actual salary increases for 2012 vary by region. Average real increase is defined as salary increase minus consumer pricing index. mp le Average Real Increase 2.34% -0.05% -1.24% 0.23% -0.56% Sa 0.45% Asia Europe 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report Latin America North America Africa Middle East 2 Special Note po rt Projected salary increase spending for 2013 remains flat for most of the countries. This also includes countries where the gross domestic product (GDP) projections for 2013 is higher than average. Companies are instead increasing their reliance on variable forms of rewards. Details on variable spending can be found in the country reports or in our Global Variable Compensation Measurement™ (VCM™) survey. Occasionally we are asked how survey antitrust rules apply to collecting and reporting salary increase information. In fact, some organizations request that they receive the report with any prospective information removed. Aon Hewitt believes that, because such data (as is presented in this report) is widely available and is sufficiently general in nature, it falls within standard survey safe harbor guidelines. Sa mp le Re However, if your company’s legal counsel suggests taking a more conservative approach, we can provide a version of the report that excludes projected data. 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 3 Sa mp le Re po rt Global Salary Increase Survey Report Availability 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 4 rt Global Salary Increase Survey Report Availability Asia Pacific mp le Australia China Fiji Guam Hong Kong India Indonesia Japan Korea Macau Malaysia New Zealand Papua New Guinea Philippines Singapore Sri Lanka Taiwan Thailand Vietnam Europe/Middle East/ Africa Sa Angola Austria Azerbaijan Bahrain Belgium Botswana Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Switzerland Tanzania Tunisia Turkey Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom Yemen Zambia po Canada United States Egypt Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Hungary Ireland Israel Italy Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kuwait Latvia Lebanon Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Morocco Mozambique Netherlands Norway Oman Poland Portugal Qatar Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Serbia Slovakia Slovenia South Africa Spain Sweden Re North America Latin America Antigua Argentina Bahamas Barbados Bermuda Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Peru Puerto Rico Trinidad and Tobago Uruguay Venezuela th You may purchase detailed survey results from any of the countries above. The 25 annual Global Salary Planning Report will be available in September 2012. For an order form or additional information, please send an email to [email protected]. 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 5 rt Sa mp le Re po Overview of Survey Results 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 6 Average Excluding Zeroes and Pay Cuts 2012 2013 Projected 2012 Merit 2013 Projected 2012 Mandatory 2013 Projected 2012 Total 2013 Projected General DEF 2012 2013 Projected 2012 Merit 2013 Projected 2012 Mandatory 2013 Projected 2012 Total 2013 Projected General GHI Middle Management Jr. Management/ Professional/ Supervisor Clerical/ Admin/Tech Manual/ Work Force po ABC Top Executive/ Sr. Management Re All Employees rt Salary Increases—XYZ Region 2012 2013 Projected 2012 Merit 2013 Projected 2012 Mandatory 2013 Projected 2012 Total 2013 Projected JKL mp le General 2012 2013 Projected 2012 Merit 2013 Projected 2012 Mandatory 2013 Projected 2012 Total 2013 Projected General MNO 2012 2013 Projected 2012 Merit 2013 Projected 2012 Mandatory 2013 Projected 2012 Total 2013 Projected Sa General 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 7 Average Including Zeroes and Pay Cuts 2012 2013 Projected 2012 Merit 2013 Projected 2012 Mandatory 2013 Projected 2012 Total 2013 Projected General DEF 2012 2013 Projected 2012 Merit 2013 Projected 2012 Mandatory 2013 Projected 2012 Total 2013 Projected General GHI Middle Management Jr. Management/ Professional/ Supervisor Clerical/ Admin/Tech Manual/ Work Force po ABC Top Executive/ Sr. Management Re All Employees rt Salary Increases—XYZ Region 2012 2013 Projected 2012 Merit 2013 Projected 2012 Mandatory 2013 Projected 2012 Total 2013 Projected JKL mp le General 2012 2013 Projected 2012 Merit 2013 Projected 2012 Mandatory 2013 Projected 2012 Total 2013 Projected General MNO 2012 2013 Projected 2012 Merit 2013 Projected 2012 Mandatory 2013 Projected 2012 Total 2013 Projected Sa General 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 8 Sa mp le Re po rt Promotional and Salary Structure Movement 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 9 Promotional Budget (%) 2013 2012 2013 Salary Structure Movement (%) 2012 2013 po 2012 Special Adjustments and/or Miscellaneous Budget (%) rt Additional Country Info—XYZ Region ABC Average Count DEF Average Count Re GHI Average Count JKL Average Count Sa mp le MNO Average Count 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 10 Sa mp le Re po rt Global Broad-Based Short-Term Incentives 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 11 rt Global Broad-Based Short-Term Incentives po Trends on Short-Term Incentive Variable Pay Plans We have asked our global participants to provide information in regards to their short-term variable pay plans. Short-Term Incentive Variable Pay Plans Re Sixty percent (60%) of companies indicated having a short-term variable pay plan that extended eligibility beyond their executives and sales employees. Unsure 2.0% mp le No Program 38.0% With Program 60.0% Sa (n=340) 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 12 rt Global vs. Regional or Local Plans po Less than 15% of our global salary increase participants reported having a local variable pay plan. Twenty percent (20%) of manufacturing companies reported having a local plan. This means that the large majority of multinationals around the globe apply the same plan at the regional or global level. Hightech and telecommunication companies are more likely to have corporate plans than other industries. Corporate 20.0% Re Regional 20.0% Regional Business Line 20.0% Global Business Line 19.0% Local 20.0% mp le (n=295) Adjustments Made by the Company by Country 2011 Percent of Organizations1 2012 Percent of Organizations1 (n=) (n=) No Adjustments Are Made Eligibility Criteria Targets Measures 1 Sa Multiple responses 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 13 rt Changes in Variable Pay Plan po We have asked participants what changes they will make in their global regional variable pay plan in 2013. Extending Coverage of This Plan to Additional Employee Groups 5.0% 5.0% 5.4% 5.8% 2.0% Increase Expected Award Opportunities 6.3% 2.4% 3.0% Decrease Expected Award Opportunities Change Performance Criteria 2.3% Re 1.0% Reduce Number of Employee Groups 5.0% 2.4% 0.0% 3.3% 5.0% 5.7% 5.4% mp le Change Funding Formula 5.0% 3.0% Additional Communication/Training 5.0% 6.3% 5.0% Reduce Communication/Training 6.0% 5.2% 6.0% 5.2% 5.4% Change Plan Objectives 8.0% Discontinue the Plan 3.6% Other No 8.8% 6.0% 9.6% Unsure Sa Yes 6.9% 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 14 Sa mp le Re po rt Global Broad-Based Long-Term Incentives 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 15 rt Global Broad-Based Long-Term Incentives po We have asked our global participants to provide information in regards to their long-term variable pay plans. Trends on Long-Term Incentive Variable Pay Plans With Program 65.0% mp le No Program 35.0% Re Sixty-five percent (65%) of participants reported having a long-term incentive plan that applies to multiple countries. Life sciences, high-tech, and chemical companies are more likely to have global long-term incentives, while consumer goods and manufacturing companies tend to have less of these plans. (n=336) Plans Offered by Company 2011 Percent of Organizations1 2012 Percent of Organizations1 (n=) (n=) Equity-Based Cash-Based Both 1 Sa Multiple responses 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 16 rt Variation of Company's Grant Guidelines by Location po Forty-five percent (45%) of the companies that grant long-term incentives use the same grant guidelines globally. By Country 20.0% Vary by Global Region 25.0% mp le (n=246) Does Not Vary 45.0% Re By Tiers 10.0% Change in Global Long-Term Incentive Policy Change in Global LTI Policy in Next 1–2 Years 15.0% Sa Change in Global LTI Policy in Past 3 Years (n=291) 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 85.0% 64.5% 35.5% Yes No 17 rt Sa mp le Re po Global Sales Compensation 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 18 rt Global Sales Compensation po Trends on Global Sales Compensation Unlike short- and long-term incentive plans, sales incentive plans are mostly local or regional in nature. However, there is a great variation across industries. High-tech companies are more likely to have corporate or global business line plans, while consumer goods and life sciences are 10 times less likely to have these plans. Global Business Line 20.0% Regional 20.0% mp le Regional Business Line 20.0% Corporate 20.0% Re No 20.0% (n=309) Responsibility for the Design and Management of the Plan Percent of Organizations1 Human Resources Finance Sales Other 1 (n=) Sa Multiple responses 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 19 23.5% 68.4% 31.6% Yes No Sa mp le (n=240) po Change in Sales Plan in Past 3 Years 76.5% Re Change in Sales Plan in Next 1 to 2 Years rt Change in Sales Plan 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 20 Sa mp le Re po rt Rewarding and Retaining High-Performing Employees 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 21 rt Rewarding and Retaining High-Performing Employees Approaches po We have asked our global salary increase participants what unique strategies they use to retain highperforming employees. Percent of Organizations1 Re Provide Additional Learning and Development Opportunities to High-Performing Employees Reserve Portion of Salary Increase Budget for Highest Performing Employees Grant Discretionary Restricted Stock and/or Stock Options to High-Performing Employees Offer Retention Bonuses for Specified Period of Employment Create Supplemental, Discretionary Incentive Pool for HighPerforming Employees None Other 1 Multiple responses (n=) Sa mp le The lack of development opportunities ranks first on the reasons for attrition globally. Only 29% of the companies use this as a strategy to retain high-performing employees. 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 22 rt Sa mp le Re po Macroeconomic Indicators 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 23 GDP Country 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 Sa mp le Re ABC DEF GHI JKL MNO Source: Economist Intelligence Unit Recorded Unemployment po Region XYZ XYZ XYZ XYZ XYZ CPI rt Macroeconomic Indicators 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 24 Sa mp le Re po rt Appendix 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 25 rt Report Definitions po Definitions of Terms The following are brief definitions of some of the concepts that are used throughout this report. Top Executive/Senior Management Re Top executives and senior managers play a key role in both short- and long-term decision-making of a major function area or business unit, direct or coordinate activities within two or more major departments, establish policy, and have a major impact on the achievement of the business unit or function goal. Example: Country manager and direct reports Middle Management Middle management are first-line managers, who manage the activities of one major department and setup standard procedure and policy or lead projects or programs which have broad effect on overall policy and achievement of organization-wide objectives. Example: Plant manager, business unit controller, marketing manager, systems manager mp le Junior Management/Professional/Supervisor Provide day-to-day management of a team, has knowledge of a specialized field of technical or administrative function and resolve problems of some difficulty, could be supervising a team or individual contributor or be an entry-level professional. Example: Production engineer/production planning manager, key account manager systems analyst, business process team leader Clerical/Admin/Tech Administrative and support level staff. Example: Administrative employee—sales trainee, merchandiser, business process associate—junior Sa Manual Workforce Employees in positions such as skilled-production worker, unskilled-production worker, and warehouse handler. Example: Assembler, loaders etc. 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 26 rt Data Collection Terms Mandatory Salary Increase Budget po The following are brief definitions of some of the concepts that are used within the data collection materials. This is an increase that is mandated by either a government or by a union. It could apply to the entire company or to different groups in the organization. Merit Salary Increase Budget Re The amount of any nonguaranteed, individual performance-based increases, including merit lump sums. The budget percentage is calculated by dividing the sum of increases granted/anticipated in the year, divided by the total salaries of all eligible employees, whether or not they received a merit increase. Note: For India the numbers represent a percent of total fixed pay. General Salary Increase Budget mp le Any increases given over and above the merit salary and mandatory increase. The budget percentage is calculated by dividing the sum of increases granted/anticipated in the year, divided by the total salaries of all eligible employees, whether or not they received a general increase. General increase includes market correction, special adjustment and promotional budgets. Note: For India the numbers represent a percent of total fixed pay. Total Salary Increase Budget The total amount of all increases combined (that is, merit increases plus general increases plus mandatory salary increases). Note: For India the numbers represent a percent of total fixed pay. Special Adjustment and/or Miscellaneous Budget Sa The amount of any salary adjustment granted to an employee for a special, or unique, situation that is not typically covered by a merit increase. This would include market, equity, or "hot skills" adjustments. The budget percentage is calculated by dividing the sum of increases granted/anticipated in the year, divided by the total salaries of all eligible employees, whether or not they received a special adjustment and/or miscellaneous increase. Note: For India the numbers represent a percent of total fixed pay. 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 27 rt Promotional Budget po The amount of any promotional increase granted to an employee for receiving a promotion. The budget percentage is calculated by dividing the sum of increases granted/anticipated in the year, divided by the total salaries of all eligible employees, whether or not they received a promotional increase. Note: For India the numbers represent a percent of total fixed pay. Salary Structure Movement Sa mp le Re This is an increase that is applied to the salary grades and bands to reflect movements in the market. In other words, this represents an increase to the salary structure and not an individual or employee group increase. 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 28 Participants Angola 13 Antigua 7 Argentina Aruba 140 11 Australia 302 Austria 159 Bahamas Bahrain Barbados Belgium Belize Bermuda Bolivia Botswana 308 34 Germany 336 Ghana 25 Gibraltar 22 Greece 165 Guam 21 14 Guatemala 34 37 Guernsey 20 18 Guyana 11 Haiti 13 10 Honduras 22 14 Hong Kong 365 19 Hungary 139 11 India 662 Indonesia 151 Ireland 149 212 206 Bulgaria 63 Canada 679 Cayman Islands Participants Georgia mp le Brazil 30 France Re Azerbaijan Country po Country rt Number of Participants per Country 11 Isle Of Man 19 Israel 88 Chile 106 Italy China 645 Jamaica 259 23 93 Japan 297 Costa Rica 52 Jordan 34 Croatia 59 Kazakhstan 68 Cyprus 28 Kenya 37 Czech Republic 184 Korea 345 Denmark 152 Kuwait 35 Dominican Republic 34 Latvia 53 Ecuador 38 Lebanon 36 Egypt 84 Lithuania 53 El Salvador 28 Luxembourg 67 Estonia 54 Macau 44 Fiji 22 Malawi 12 Sa Columbia Finland 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 127 Malaysia 235 29 Malta Mexico 31 212 Morocco 47 Mozambique 14 Netherlands 231 New Zealand Nicaragua Norway Oman Panama Papua New Guinea Peru Philippines Poland Portugal 13 148 18 136 South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Suriname Participants 157 240 46 8 Sweden 191 Switzerland 219 Taiwan 205 Tanzania 13 Thailand 209 Re Netherlands Antilles Country rt Participants po Country 28 Trinidad And Tobago 20 37 Tunisia 33 26 Turkey 146 69 Uganda 14 164 Ukraine 79 206 United Arab Emirates 185 135 United Kingdom 447 58 United States Qatar 47 Uruguay 34 Romania 113 Vanuatu 16 Russia 194 Venezuela 53 Saipan 21 Vietnam 120 Saudi Arabia 76 Yemen 11 Serbia 57 Zambia 12 mp le Puerto Rico 304 Zimbabwe Slovakia 109 Grand Total Slovenia 54 9 14,165 Sa Singapore 1,306 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 30 rt About Aon Hewitt © 2012 Aon plc. All rights reserved. Re www.aonhewitt.com po Aon Hewitt is the global leader in human resource solutions. The company partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits, talent and related financial challenges, and improve business performance. Aon Hewitt designs, implements, communicates, and administers a wide range of human capital, retirement, investment management, health care, compensation, and talent management strategies. With more than 29,000 professionals in 90 countries, Aon Hewitt makes the world a better place to work for clients and their employees. For more information on Aon Hewitt, please visit To protect the confidential and proprietary information included in this material, it may not be disclosed or provided to any third parties without the prior written consent of Aon Hewitt. Aon Hewitt does not accept or assume any responsibility for any consequences arising from any person, other than the intended recipient, using or relying on this material. Sa mp le Authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. 2012–2013 Global Salary Planning Report 31
© Copyright 2024