COEFFICIENT ESTIMATES FOR A NEW SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC AND BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY HADAMARD PRODUCT SERAP BULUT Abstract. In this paper, we introduce and investigate a new general subclass H ; ('; ) of analytic and bi-univalent functions in the open unit disk U: For functions belonging to this class, we obtain estimates on the …rst two Taylor-Maclaurin coe¢ cients ja2 j and ja3 j : 1. Introduction Let A denote the class of all functions of the form f (z) = z + 1 X an z n (1.1) n=2 which are analytic in the open unit disk U = fz : z 2 C and jzj < 1g : We also denote by S the class of all functions in the normalized analytic function class A which are univalent in U: Since univalent functions are one-to-one, they are invertible and the inverse functions need not be de…ned on the entire unit disk U: In fact, the Koebe one-quarter theorem [7] ensures that the image of U under every univalent function f 2 S contains a disk of radius 1=4: Thus every function f 2 A has an inverse f 1 ; which is de…ned by f 1 (f (z)) = z (z 2 U) and f f 1 (w) = w jwj < r0 (f ) ; r0 (f ) 1 4 : 2000 Mathematics Subject Classi…cation. Primary 30C45. Key words and phrases. Analytic functions; Univalent functions; Bi-univalent functions; Taylor-Maclaurin series expansion; Coe¢ cient bounds and coe¢ cient estimates; Taylor-Maclaurin coe¢ cients; Hadamard product (convolution). 1 2 SERAP BULUT 1 In fact, the inverse function f f 1 a2 w2 + 2a22 (w) = w is given by a3 w 3 5a32 5a2 a3 + a4 w4 + : Denote by f the Hadamard product (or convolution) of the functions f and ; that is, if f is given by (1:1) and is given by (z) = z + 1 X bn z n (1.2) (bn > 0) ; n=2 then (f ) (z) = z + 1 X an b n z n : (1.3) n=2 For two functions f and , analytic in U; we say that the function f is subordinate to in U; and write f (z) (z 2 U) ; (z) if there exists a Schwarz function !; which is analytic in U with ! (0) = 0 and j! (z)j < 1 (z 2 U) such that f (z) = (! (z)) (z 2 U) : Indeed, it is known that f (z) (z) (z 2 U) ) f (0) = Furthermore, if the function following equivalence f (z) (z) (0) and f (U) (U) : is univalent in U; then we have the (z 2 U) , f (0) = (0) and f (U) (U) : A function f 2 A is said to be bi-univalent in U if both f and f 1 are univalent in U: Let denote the class of bi-univalent functions in U given by (1:1) : For a brief history and interesting examples of functions in the class ; see [15] (see also [3]). In fact, the aforecited work of Srivastava et al. [15] essentially revived the investigation of various subclasses of the bi-univalent function class in recent years; it was followed by such works as those by Tang et al. [16], El-Ashwah [8], Frasin and Aouf [9], Aouf et al. [1], and others (see, for example, [4, 5, 6, 10, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18]). Throughout this paper, we assume that ' is an analytic function with positive real part in the unit disk U; satisfying ' (0) = 1; '0 (0) > 0; and ON THE NEW SUBCLASS OF BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS 3 ' (U) is symmetric with respect to the real axis. Such a function has a series expansion of the form ' (z) = 1 + B1 z + B2 z 2 + ; (1.4) (B1 > 0) : With this assumption on '; we now introduce the following subclass of bi-univalent functions. De…nition 1. Let the function f; de…ned by (1:1) ; be in the analytic function class A and let 2 : We say that f 2H ; ('; ) ( 1; 0) if the following conditions are satis…ed: f2 ; (1 (f ) ) (z) z (f )0 (z) + (f 1 ) (z) ' (z) z (z 2 U) (1.5) and (1 (f ) ) w 1 (w) ! + (f 1 0 ) (w) (f ) w 1 (w) ! 1 ' (w) (w 2 U) ; (1.6) where the function (f (f ) 1 ) 1 is given by (w) = w a2 b2 w2 + 2a22 b22 a3 b 3 w 3 Remark 1: If we let 5a32 b32 5a2 b2 a3 b3 + a4 b4 w4 + (1.7) z ; 1 z then the class H ; ('; ) reduces to the class denoted by H ( ; ') which is the subclass of the functions f 2 satisfying (z) = f (z) z 1 + f 0 (z) g (w) (1 ) + g 0 (w) w where the function g is de…ned by g (w) w 1 (1 ) f (z) z and g (w) = w a2 w2 + 2a22 a3 w 3 5a32 ' (z) ' (w) ; 5a2 a3 + a4 w4 + which was introduced and studied recently by Tang et al. [16]. ; (1.8) : 4 SERAP BULUT Remark 2: If we let 1+z 1 z ' (z) = (0 < 1) ; then the class H ; ('; ) reduces to the new class denoted by H ; ( ; ) which is the subclass of the functions f 2 satisfying ) ( 1 (f ) (z) (f ) (z) 0 + (f ) (z) arg (1 ) < z z 2 and 8 < arg (1 : ) (f ) w where the function (f classes (i) H 1 (w) ) ;1 ! 1 + (f ) 1 0 (w) (f ) w 1 (w) ! is de…ned by (1:7) : Also we have the ( ; )=B ( ; ; ) introduced and studied recently by El-Ashwah [8]; (ii) z =N ( ; ) H ; ; 1 z introduced and studied recently by Ça¼ glar et al. [6]; (iii) z H ;1 ; =B ( ; ) 1 z introduced and studied by Frasin and Aouf [9]; (iv) z H1;0 ; =S [ ] 1 z of strongly bi-starlike functions of order (0 < 1) introduced and studied by Brannan and Taha [3]; (v) ! 1 X (a ) (a ) 1 1 n q n z n = Tq;s [a1 ; b1 ; ; ] H ;1 ;z + (b1 )n (bs )n n! n=2 introduced and studied recently by Aouf et al. [1]. Remark 3: If we let ' (z) = 1 + (1 1 2 )z z (0 < 1) ; 1 9 = ; < 2 ; ON THE NEW SUBCLASS OF BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS 5 then the class H ; ('; ) reduces to the new class denoted by H ; ( ; ) which is the subclass of the functions f 2 satisfying ( ) 1 (f ) (z) (f ) (z) < (1 ) + (f )0 (z) > z z and 8 < < (1 : ) (f ) w 1 (w) where the function (f classes (i) H ! 1 ) ;1 + (f ) 1 0 (w) (f ) w 1 (w) ! is de…ned by (1:7) : Also we have the ( ; )=B ( ; ; ) introduced and studied recently by El-Ashwah [8]; (ii) z H ; ; =N ( ; ) 1 z introduced and studied recently by Ça¼ glar et al. [6]; (iii) z =B ( ; ) H ;1 ; 1 z introduced and studied by Frasin and Aouf [9]; (iv) z H1;0 ; =S ( ) 1 z of bi-starlike functions of order by Brannan and Taha [3]; (v) H ;1 ;z + 1 X (a1 ) n n=2 (b1 )n (0 < 1) introduced and studied (aq )n 1 n z (bs )n n! ! = Tq;s [a1 ; b1 ; ; ] introduced and studied recently by Aouf et al. [1]. For more results see also [2, 4, 11, 14, 15, 18]. Firstly, in order to derive our main results, we need to following lemma. 1 9 = ; > ; 6 SERAP BULUT Lemma 1. [12] If p 2 P; then jcn j 2 for each n; where P is the family of all functions p analytic in U for which < (p (z)) > 0; p (z) = 1 + c1 z + c2 z 2 + for z 2 U: 2. A set of general coefficient estimates In this section, we state and prove our general results involving the bi-univalent function class H ; ('; ) given by De…nition 1: Theorem 1. Let the function f (z) given by the Taylor-Maclaurin series expansion (1:1) be in the function class H ; ('; ) ( 1; with 2 and 1 min b2 q and ( B1 + ; s (bn > 0) : 2 (B1 + jB2 B1 j) ; ( + 1) (2 + ) p B1 2B1 B12 ( + 1) (2 + ) B1 B12 2 + 2 + ( + ) 1 min b3 ja3 j bn z n n=2 Then ja2 j (z) = z + 1 X 0) ; 2B13 B12 ( + 1) (2 + ) 2 (B2 2 2 (B2 B1 ) ( + ) 9 = ; (2.1) B1 [( + 3) + j1 j] 2 jB2 B1 j + ; 2 ( + 1) (2 + ) ( + 1) (2 + ) ) B1 + : (2.2) 2 + B1 ) ( + )2 Proof. Let f 2 H ; ('; ) : Then there are analytic functions u; v : U ! U; with u (0) = v (0) = 0; satisfying (1 ) (f ) (z) z and (1 ) (f ) w 1 (w) + (f ! + (f )0 (z) ) 1 0 (f 1 ) (z) = ' (u (z)) z (w) (f ) w 1 (w) ! 1 = ' (v (w)) : ON THE NEW SUBCLASS OF BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS 7 De…ne the functions p and q by p(z) = 1 + u (z) = 1 + p1 z + p2 z 2 + 1 u (z) q(z) = 1 + v (z) = 1 + q1 z + q 2 z 2 + 1 v (z) (2.3) and ; (2.4) z2 + (2.5) or, equivalently, u (z) = p21 2 p (z) 1 1 = p1 z + p2 p (z) + 1 2 and q (z) 1 q12 1 v (z) = = q1 z + q2 z2 + : (2.6) q (z) + 1 2 2 Then p and q are analytic in U with p (0) = 1 = q (0) : Since u; v : U ! U; the functions p and q have a positive real part in U; and by Lemma 1 jpn j 2 and jqn j 2 for each n: Also it is clear that (1 ) (f ) (z) z and (1 ) (f ) w 1 (w) )0 (z) + (f ! + (f ) (f ) (z) 1 (f ) w =' z 1 0 (w) 1 (w) p (z) 1 p (z) + 1 (2.7) ! 1 =' (2.8) Using (2:5) and (2:6) together with (1:4) ; we get ' p (z) 1 p (z) + 1 1 = 1 + B1 p1 z + 2 1 B1 p2 2 p21 2 q (w) 1 q (w) + 1 1 = 1 + B1 q1 w + 2 1 B1 q2 2 q12 2 1 + B2 p21 z 2 + 4 (2.9) and ' Now, upon equating the coe¢ cients in (2:7) 1 + B2 q12 w2 + : 4 (2.10) (2:10) ; we get 1 ( + ) b2 a2 = B1 p1 ; 2 (2 + ) b3 a3 + ( 1) + 1 b22 a22 = B1 p2 2 2 1 ( + ) b2 a2 = B1 q1 2 (2.11) p21 2 1 + B2 p21 ; 4 (2.12) (2.13) q (w) 1 q (w) + 1 : 8 SERAP BULUT and (2 + ) b3 a3 + ( + 3) + 1 b22 a22 = B1 q2 2 2 q12 2 1 + B2 q12 : 4 (2.14) From (2:11) and (2:13) ; it follows that p1 = (2.15) q1 and 1 2 ( + )2 b22 a22 = B12 p21 + q12 : 4 Now (2:12) ; (2:14) and (2:15) yield a22 = (2.16) B1 (p2 + q2 ) + (B2 B1 ) p21 : 2 ( + 1) (2 + ) b22 (2.17) Also from (2:12) ; (2:14) and (2:16) ; we get a22 = B13 (p2 + q2 ) 2 B12 ( + 1) (2 + ) 2 (B2 B1 ) ( + )2 b22 : (2.18) Applying Lemma 1 for (2:11) ; (2:17) and (2:18) ; we get the desired estimate on the coe¢ cient ja2 j as asserted in (2:1) : Next, in order to …nd the bound on the coe¢ cient ja3 j ; by subtracting (2:14) from (2:12) ; we obtain 2 (2 + ) b3 a3 1 2 (2 + ) b22 a22 = B1 (p2 2 q2 ) : (2.19) Upon substituting the value of a22 from (2:11) ; (2:17) and (2:18) into (2:19) ; it follows that a3 = B1 (p2 q2 ) B12 p21 + ; 2 4 ( + ) b3 4 (2 + ) b3 (2.20) B1 (p2 + q2 ) + (B2 B1 ) p21 B1 (p2 q2 ) + 2 ( + 1) (2 + ) b3 4 (2 + ) b3 B1 [( + 3) p2 + (1 ) q2 ] + 2 (B2 B1 ) p21 = 4 ( + 1) (2 + ) b3 a3 = (2.21) and B13 (p2 + q2 ) 2 B12 ( + 1) (2 + ) 2 (B2 B1 (p2 q2 ) ; B1 ) ( + ) b3 4 (2 + ) b3 (2.22) respectively. Applying Lemma 1 for the (2:20) ; (2:21) and (2:22) ; we get the desired estimate on the coe¢ cient ja3 j as asserted in (2:2) : a3 = 2 + ON THE NEW SUBCLASS OF BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS If we take 9 z (z) = 1 z in Theorem 1; then we have the following corollary. Corollary 1. Let the function f (z) given by the Taylor-Maclaurin series expansion (1:1) be in the function class H ( ; ') Then ja2 j min q and ja3 j ( B1 + ; ( s 1; 0) : 2 (B1 + jB2 B1 j) ; ( + 1) (2 + ) p B1 2B1 B12 ( + 1) (2 + ) B12 B1 2 + 2 + ( + ) 2 (B2 B1 ) ( + )2 9 = ; B1 [( + 3) + j1 j] 2 jB2 B1 j + ; 2 ( + 1) (2 + ) ( + 1) (2 + ) ) B1 2B13 + : 2 + B12 ( + 1) (2 + ) 2 (B2 B1 ) ( + )2 min ; Remark 4: Corollary 1 is an improvement of the estimates which were given by Tang et al. [16, Theorem 2:1]. Remark 5: If we set = 1 and = 1 in Corollary 1; then we have an improvement of the estimates which were given by Ali et al. [2, Theorem 2:1]. If we take 1+z (0 < 1) 1 z in Theorem 1; then we have the following corollary. ' (z) = Corollary 2. Let the function f (z) given by the Taylor-Maclaurin series expansion (1:1) be in the function class H ; ( ; ) ( 1; with 2 and (z) = z + 0; 0 < 1 X n=2 bn z n 1) (bn > 0) : 10 SERAP BULUT Then 1 min b2 ja2 j q and ja3 j 1 min b3 ( 2 + ; 2 ( + )2 + ; 2 [( + 3) + j1 j] 4 (1 ) + ; 2 ( + 1) (2 + ) ( + 1) (2 + ) ) 2 : + 2 + 2 +2 2 ; 2 ( + )2 + 4 (2 ) ; ( + 1) (2 + ) 9 = +2 4 2 2 2 + 2 + ( + ) 4 s Remark 6: In Corollary 2; (i) if we set = 1; then we have an improvement of the estimates which were given by El-Ashwah [8, Theorem 1], (ii) if we set (z) = 1 z z ; then we have an improvement of the estimates which were given by Ça¼ glar et al. [6, Theorem 2:1], z (iii) if we set (z) = 1 z and = 1; then we have an improvement of the estimates which were given by Frasin and Aouf [9, Theorem 2:2], P (a1 )n (aq )n 1 n (iv) if we set (z) = z + 1 = 1; then we have n=2 (b1 )n (bs )n n! z and an improvement of the estimates which were given by Aouf et al. [1, Theorem 4]. If we take 1 + (1 2 ) z (0 < 1) 1 z in Theorem 1; then we have the following corollary. ' (z) = Corollary 3. Let the function f (z) given by the Taylor-Maclaurin series expansion (1:1) be in the function class B ( ; ; ) ( 1; 0 with 2 and bn z n (bn > 0) : n=2 Then ja2 j (z) = z + 1 X < 1) 1 min b2 ( 2 (1 + ) ; s 4 (1 ) ( + 1) (2 + ) ) ON THE NEW SUBCLASS OF BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS and ja3 j 8 > > < > > : 1 b3 min n 4(1 )2 ( + )2 + 2(1 ) 2 + ; 4(1 ) ( +1)(2 + ) 2(1 ) (2 + )b3 o ; 0 11 <1 : ; 1 Remark 7: In Corollary 3; (i) if we set = 1; then we have an improvement of the estimates which were given by El-Ashwah [8, Theorem 2], (ii) if we set (z) = 1 z z ; then we have the estimates which were given by Ça¼ glar et al. [6, Theorem 3:1], (iii) if we set (z) = 1 z z and = 1; then we have an improvement of the estimates which were given by Frasin and Aouf [9, Theorem 3:2], P (a1 )n (aq )n 1 n (iv) if we set (z) = z + 1 = 1; then we have n=2 (b1 )n (bs )n n! z and an improvement of the estimates which were given by Aouf et al. [1, Theorem 8]. References [1] M.K. Aouf, R. M. El-Ashwah and A.M. Abd-Eltawab, New subclasses of biunivalent functions involving Dziok-Srivastava operator, ISRN Math. Anal. 2013, Art. ID 387178, 5 pp. [2] R.M. Ali, S.K. Lee, V. Ravichandran, S. Supramaniam, Coe¢ cient estimates for bi-univalent Ma-Minda starlike and convex functions, Appl. Math. Lett. 25 (2012), 344–351. [3] D.A. Brannan and T.S. Taha, On some classes of bi-univalent functions, in Mathematical Analysis and Its Applications (S. M. Mazhar, A. Hamoui and N. S. Faour, Editors) (Kuwait; February 18–21, 1985), KFAS Proceedings Series, Vol. 3, Pergamon Press (Elsevier Science Limited), Oxford, 1988, pp. 53–60; see also Studia Univ. Babe¸s -Bolyai Math. 31 (2) (1986), 70–77. [4] S. Bulut, Coe¢ cient estimates for a class of analytic and bi-univalent functions, Novi Sad J. Math. 43 (2) (2013), 59–65. [5] S. Bulut, Coe¢ cient estimates for new subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions de…ned by Al-Oboudi di¤ erential operator, J. Funct. Spaces Appl. 2013, Art. ID 181932, 7 pp. [6] M. Ça¼ glar, H. Orhan and N. Ya¼ gmur, Coe¢ cient bounds for new subclasses of bi-univalent functions, Filomat 27 (7) (2013), 1165–1171. [7] P.L. Duren, Univalent Functions, in: Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 259, Springer, New York, 1983. [8] R.M. El-Ashwah, Subclasses of bi-univalent functions de…ned by convolution, J. Egyptian Math Soc. 22 (3) (2014), 348–351. [9] B.A. Frasin and M.K. Aouf, New subclasses of bi-univalent functions, Appl. Math. Lett. 24 (2011), 1569–1573. 12 SERAP BULUT [10] T. Hayami and S. Owa, Coe¢ cient bounds for bi-univalent functions, Pan Amer. Math. J. 22 (4) (2012), 15–26. [11] S.S. Kumar, V. Kumar and V. Ravichandran, Estimates for the initial coe¢ cients of bi-univalent functions, Preprint. [12] Ch. Pommerenke, Univalent Functions, Vandenhoeck and Rupercht, Göttingen, 1975. [13] S. Porwal and M. Darus, On a new subclass of bi-univalent functions, J. Egyptian Math Soc. 21 (3) (2013), 190–193. [14] H.M. Srivastava, S. Bulut, M. Ça¼ glar and N. Ya¼ gmur, Coe¢ cient estimates for a general subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions, Filomat 27 (5) (2013), 831–842. [15] H.M. Srivastava, A.K. Mishra and P. Gochhayat, Certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions, Appl. Math. Lett. 23 (2010), 1188–1192. [16] H. Tang, G.-T. Deng and S.-H. Li, Coe¢ cient estimates for new subclasses of Ma-Minda bi-univalent functions, J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 2013:317, 10 pp. [17] Q.-H. Xu, Y.-C. Gui and H.M. Srivastava, Coe¢ cient estimates for a certain subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions, Appl. Math. Lett. 25 (2012), 990–994. [18] Q.-H. Xu, H.-G. Xiao and H.M. Srivastava, A certain general subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions and associated coe¢ cient estimate problems, Appl. Math. Comput. 218 (2012), 11461–11465. Serap BULUT Kocaeli University, Civil Aviation College, Arslanbey Campus, 41285 · Izmit-Kocaeli, TURKEY E-mail address: [email protected]
© Copyright 2024