From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. 1993 82: 712-715 Persistence of the 8;21 translocation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia type M2 in long-term remission G Nucifora, RA Larson and JD Rowley Updated information and services can be found at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/82/3/712.full.html Articles on similar topics can be found in the following Blood collections Information about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#repub_requests Information about ordering reprints may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#reprints Information about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/subscriptions/index.xhtml Blood (print ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020), is published weekly by the American Society of Hematology, 2021 L St, NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20036. Copyright 2011 by The American Society of Hematology; all rights reserved. From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. RAPID COMMUNICATION Persistence of the 8;21 Translocation in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Type M2 in Long-Term Remission By Giuseppina Nucifora, Richard A. Larson, and Janet D. Rowley The translocation between chromosomes 8 and 21, t(8;21) (q22;q22), is the most frequent abnormality in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with French-American-British type M2 (FAB-MP) morphology. The breakpoints in this translocation have been characterized at the molecular level, and the genes involved areAML 1on chromosome 21 and €TO on chromosome 8. The rearrangement of the two chromosomes results in a fusion gene and in the production of a consistent fusion transcript on the der(8) chromosome. We have used oligonucleotide primers derived from both sides of the fusion cDNA junction and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to analyze six AML-M2 patients with a t(8;21) during various stages of their disease. Two patients studied at diagnosis and one studied at first relapse are alive off therapy and in continuous complete remission for 8 3 t o 94 months. We have detected the AMLIETO fusion transcript in recent peripheral blood samples from each of them. Three other patients also had a fusion transcript detected after l to 4 months in remission. Two of these patients subsequently relapsed and died whereas the third patient is alive and in continuous complete remission 70 months later. Thus, our preliminary data suggest that cells with the translocation are still circulating in t(8;21) patients in long-term remission. This finding raises serious questions regarding the interpretation of positive results obtained only with this technique that may not be suitable to decide appropriate further treatment for patients in clinical remission. 0 1993 by The American Society o f Hematology. 0 DNA rearrangements can be detected by Southern blot analysis in 80% to 100% of the patient^.^.^ More importantly, appropriate primers designed from the chimeric cDNA sequence from both sides of the junction can detect an identical size chimeric transcript by reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) in all of the patients tested.6 We used RT-PCR to analyze peripheral blood (PB) samples recently obtained from patients who had been diagnosed with AML-M2 and the t(8;21) and treated as long ago as 8 years. Our analysis shows that the chimeric transcript is still detectable in these samples, indicating that cells with the 8;2 1 chromosomal translocation are still present in patients with AML-M2 in long-term remission. NE OF THE central tenets of the management of patients with acute leukemia is that the cytogenetically abnormal leukemic clone, present at diagnosis, disappears during remission. Its reappearance is often used to confirm a relapse. This view has now been called into question by our ability to detect a very small number of abnormal cells, in the range of 1 in IO4 or lo5,with the use ofthe polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This technique is especially powerful when used to detect the product of fusion genes that result from chromosome translocations. The 8;2 1 translocation with breaks at 8q22 and 21q22.3 is a recumng translocation observed in approximately 20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia type M2 (AMLM2).’s2This translocation results in the fusion oftwo genes, AMLl on chromosome 21, and E T 0 on chromosome 8, with the formation of a chimeric gene AMLl/ETO on the ~ cloning of derivative 8 [der(8)] c h r o m ~ s o m e .Molecular the 8;2 1 translocation has provided genomic probes from either side of the breakpoint junction; in several studies, ~ ~~~ From the Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, and the Cancer Research Center, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Submitted April 12, 1993; accepted April 29, 1993. Supported by Department of Energy Grant No. DE-FGO286ER60408 (J.D.R.), National Institutes of Health Grant Nos. CA 42557 (J.D.R.) and CA40046 (R.A.L. and J.D.R.), andspastic Paralysis Research Foundation, Illinois-Eastern Iowa District Kiwanis International (J.D.R.). G.N. was supported by National Institutes of Health training Grant No. ST32CAO9273-14. Address reprint requests to Janet Rowley, MD. Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, 5841 S Maryland Ave. MC2115, Chicago, IL 60637. The publication costs of this article were defiayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C.section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 0 1993 by The American Society of Hematology. 0006-49 71/93/8203-0044$3.00/0 712 MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients’ and normal control samples. PB samples were recently obtained with informed consent from three patients in longterm remission (patient nos. 4, 5, and 6, Table I). The red blood cells (RBCs) were separated by centrifugation, and the leukocytes were removed and used for RT-PCR analysis. Although bone marrow (BM) samples were not evaluated, there was no clinical evidence of recurrent disease in these patients. In addition, we had frozen leukocytes from BM samples taken at diagnosis and in early remission for these patients, for another patient in long-term remission (no. 3, Table l), and for two other t(8;21) AML patients who later relapsed (patient nos. 1 and 2, Table 1). The karyotypes ofthe leukemia cells at diagnosis or at relapse of all of the patients analyzed have been reported previously.6The cell line Kasumi-l established from a patient with AML-M2 and the t(8;Zl) was used as a positive contr01.~The TK-6 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) and the M L 1 cell lines and PB samples from two individuals who did not have AML were used as negative controls. These cells do not contain the t(8;21). The cell lines were grown in RPMI 1640 with 10%fetal bovine serum FBS and were maintained under standard conditions. RNA preparation. PolyA RNA was prepared from 0.8 to 3 X IO7 PB leukocytes or BM cells or cell lines with the Fast Track mRNA isolation kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All of the polyA RNA isolated (0.1 to 1 pg) was used for the synthesis of the first-strand cDNA necessary 6/0od, Vol82, No 3 (August 1). 1993: pp 7 12-715 From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. 713 PERSISTENCE OF t(8;21) IN LONG-TERM REMISSION Table 1. Clinical Characteristics of Patients With AML-M2 and the t(8;21), and Results of the Cytogenetics, Southern Blots, and PCR Analyses Diagnosis % of t(8;21) cells' Southern blot/PCR Source Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5 Patient 6 07/05/85 42 n.d.1n.d. BM 04/03/85 100 i1n.d.t BM 1 i/o5/a 1 94 n.d.1n.d. BM 05119/83 94 n.d./n.d. BM 10/22/85 100 t / n .d.t BM 12/04/a4 100 +/n .d.t BM Months in CR1 % of t(8;2 1) cells" Southern blot/PCR Source 4 12 1 9 0 0 0 0 n.d./+ BM -1n.d.t BM n.d./+ BM n.d./t BM 84 n.d. n.d./t PB 94 n.d. n.d./t PB Alive, NED 88+ Alive, NED 99+ Months in CR1 % of t(8;21) cells. Southern blot/PCR Source 1211 1/85 5 -1n.d.t 0M 05/29/87 91 +/n.d.t BM First relapse % of t(8;2 1) cells. Southern blot/PCR Source 1 1/04/86 50 +/n.d.t BM Months in CR2 % of t(8;2 1) cells' Southern blot/PCR Source 1 1 1 0 -/+t 0 0 -/+ BM BM n.d./+ BM Months in CR2 % of t(8;21) cells' Southern blot/PCR Source 09/30/85 38 +/+t BM 81 n.d. n.d./+ PB Second relapse % of t(8;21) cells' Southern blot/PCR Source 07/28/88 25 +/tt BM Status Follow-up (mos in CR) Died Died Alive, NED 70t Alive, NED 85+ Abbreviations: NED, no evidence of disease; n.d., not determined; CR1, first complete remission; CR2, second complete remission. Cells analyzed by cytogenetics. t Data from reference 6. for PCR amplification. The synthesis was performed with the cDNA First Strand Synthesis kit (Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology, Piscataway, NJ) in a total reaction volume of 15 pL. PCR amplification and Southern blot analysis. For each PCR amplification, 4 pL of the cDNA reaction volume was used. Primers I and I1 and the conditions for the PCR reactionshave been described.6The amplification produces a DNA fragment of 339 bp.6 The probe used for the Southern blot analysis of the electrophoresed PCR reactions was a 0.77-kb fragment obtained by PCR amplification of an AMLI/ETO cDNA as previously described.6 RESULTS Clinical analysis. All patients had received intensive remission induction and consolidation chemotherapy, usually with cytarabine and an anthracycline andfor with high-dosecytarabine regimens. No maintenancechemotherapy was administered. One of the patients (no. 5) received a syngeneic BM transplant. Four of the patients (nos. 1 through 4) had a relapse. Patient 2 was studied by PCR after 4 months in first clinical and cytogenetic remission (CRl), and the patient relapsed 3 months after the marrow sample was taken. Patients 1 and 3 were studied by PCR only in second remission and patient 4 only at first relapse and second remission. In none of the remission marrow samples were metaphase cells with the t(8;2 1) observed. Four of the patients (nos. 3 through 6 ) currently remain in complete remission more than 5 to 8 years after last chemotherapy. Analysis of the PCR amplification reactions. We had previously analyzed leukemia samples from all of the patients at diagnosis or relapse and detected either a rearrangement in the AMLl gene by Southern blot analysis or a fusion transcript by RT-PCR.6 Using RT-PCR, we analyzed all ofthe early and long-term remission samples. We consistently observed a faint band of 339 bp in ethidium bromidestained gels representing the chimeric AMLI/ETO mRNA junction only in samples from the six patients and from the Kasumi-1 cell line but not from the TK-6 and M G l cell lines or the control individuals (not shown). Figure 1A shows the autoradiogram of the Southern blot for the six patients during early remission. Figure 1B shows the results From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. NUCIFORA, LARSON, AND ROWLEY 714 B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Fig 1. (A) Autoradiogram of the PCR-amplified products from the cell line Kasumi-1, carrying the t(8;21) (lane 1). the t(8;21) patients early in hematologic and cytogenetic remission (patients 1 to 6, lanes 2 to 7). and the myeloid cell line ML-1, (lane 8). The karyotypes of the patients at diagnosis have been described:' corresponding numbers of patients 1 to 6 in reference 6 are: patients 5,9, 12, 14, 16, and 20. (B)Autoradiogram of the PCR-amplified products from the cell line Kasumi-1, carrying the t(8;21) (lane 1). the PB of the patients in long-term remissions (patients 4. 5 . and 6: lanes 2, 3, and 4). the cell line TK-6 (lane 5 ) . and two control individuals (lanes 6 and 7). The probe used was a 0.77-kb chimeric fragment obtained from a t(8;21) chimeric c D N A . ~ from recent PB samples for 3 of the 4 long-term patients (nos. 4, 5, and 6); we were not able to obtain a recent blood sample from patient 3. DISCUSSION We have used RT-PCR with primers mapping on both sides of the A M L l / E T O chimeric cDNA junction to detect the fusion transcript in PB samples obtained recently from three patients who were diagnosed and successfully treated for AML-M2 with the t(8;21) more than 6 to 8 years ago (patients 4 through 6, Table I). Our results show that these patients still have circulating leukocytes with the t(8;2 1) producing the chimeric AMLI/ETO transcript. We studied samples from two of these patients at initial diagnosis and during remission (nos. 5 and 6) and one of them during first relapse and subsequent remission (no. 4). All ofthe patients at diagnosis or relapse had DNA rearrangements on standard Southern blot analysis, and they amplified the same size chimeric AMLI/ETO mRNA junction on RT-PCR during early or long-term remission. So far we have only studied three patients who had sequential samples from diagnosis or relapse through long-term remission, and thus we cannot extrapolate our results to all patients. We have studied one additional patient after 1 month and 4.5 years in remission whose cells had the t(8;2 1) at diagnosis. Several analyses on this patient's early remission BM and more recent blood sample failed to detect an amplified chimeric message on RT-PCR. We did not have any sample of this patient at diagnosis to analyze for the presence of the chi- meric transcript, but it is possible that some long-term survivors may actually be cured. The t(8;21) is a recumng chromosomal abnormality that is closely associated with a characteristic morphologic subtype of AML and a favorable response to chemotherapy.'-'' The great majority of these patients (in some series 100%) will achieve complete hematologic remission, and the translocation is then no longer detectable in BM metaphase cells by cytogenetic methods. After additional remission-consolidation chemotherapy, these remissions are generally durable, and relapses after more than 2 years in remission are uncommon. Indeed, AML-M2 with t(8;21) is generally felt to be among the most "favorable" subtypes of AML because of its predictably high rate of cure (about 60%).Characteristically, the arrest in maturation ofgranulocytic differentiation is not complete in this subtype of leukemia, and at diagnosis it is likely that many circulating mature granulocytes are in fact the progeny of the neoplastic clone. It is remarkable that even after 8 years in clinical remission (and in one case after BM transplantation), cells that appear to be derived from the leukemic lineage continue to circulate in the blood. The role of molecular methods of detection of subclinical leukemia is currently being explored. PCR methods that can amplify a unique nucleotide sequence from I in IOs cells can detect residual disease with a sensitivity that far exceeds standard light microscopy or routine cytogenetics. The t(8;21) AML is not the only malignancy in which minimal residual disease has been detected by PCR methods during long-term remission."*'* As in these other cases, the From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. PERSISTENCE OF t(8;21) IN LONG-TERM REMISSION biologic and clinical significance of the presence of cells carrying specific abnormalities associated with cancer are still unknown. The expression of the chimeric protein could represent only one of the modifications necessary for the development of cancer and leukemia, and the affected clone would require additional mutations to express the transformed phenotype. Alternatively, it is possible that these t(8;2 1) cells are in fact completely transformed, but that cell proliferation is repressed by an unknown mechanism. However, as illustrated by our patients who have remained in continuous remission for over 5 years, further cytotoxic chemotherapy or BM transplantation is not an appropriate response to a positive test result. Longer follow-up is required to gain the appropriate perspective on our relatively disquieting observations. However, they suggest that a new paradigm regarding the implications of translocation-carrying cells may be required. ACKNOWLEDGMENT We thank Dr Michelle M. LeBeau for cytogenetic analysis and Karen M. Daly for assistance in obtaining these patients’ samples. REFERENCES I . Mitelman F, Heim S. Quantitative acute leukemia cytogenetics. Genes Chromosom Cancer 5 5 7 , 1992 2. Fourth International Workshop on Chromosomes in Leukemia, 1982. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 11:249, 1984 3. Erickson P, Gao J, Chang K-S, Look T, Whisenant E, Raimondi S, Lasher R, Trujillo J, Rowley JD, Drabkin H: Identification of breakpoints in t(8;21) AML and isolation of a fusion transcript with similarity to Drosophila segmentation gene runt. Blood 80: 1825, 1992 715 4. Miyoshi H, Shimizu K, Kozu T, Maseki N, Kaneko Y, Ohki M: The t(8;21) breakpoints on chromosome 21 in acute myeloid leukemia clustered within a limited region of a novel gene, AMLI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:10431, 1991 5 . Tighe J, Daga A, Calabi F: Translocation breakpoints are clustered on both chromosome 8 and chromosome 2 I in the t(8;2 1) of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 81592, 1993 6. Nucifora G, Birn D, Erickson P, Ciao J, Le Beau MM, Drabkin HA, Rowley JD: Detection of DNA rearrangements in the AMLI and E T 0 loci and of an AMLI/ETO fusion mRNA in patients with t(8;21) AML. Blood 81:888, 1993 7. Asou H, Tashiro S, Hamamoto K, Otsuji A, Kita K, Kamada N: Establishment of a human acute myeloid leukemia cell line (Kasumi-1) with 8;21 chromosome translocation. Blood 77:203 1,199 1 8. Bitter MA, LeBeau MM, Rowley JD, Larson RA, Golomb HM, Vardiman JW: Association between morphology, karyotype, and clinical features in myeloid leukemias. Hum Path01 18:211, 1987 9. Mitelman F, Heim S: Cancer Cytogenetics. New York, NY, Liss, 1987 10. Swirsky DM, Li YS, Matthews JG, Flemans RJ, Rees JKH, Hayhoe FGJ: 8;2 I translocation in acute granulocytic leukaemia: Cytological, cytochemical and clinical features. Br J Haematol 56:199, 1984 11. Lange W, Snyder DS, Castro R, Rossi JJ, Blume KG: Detection by enzymatic amplification of bcr-ab1 mRNA in peripheral blood and bone marrow cells of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood 73:1735, 1989 12. Pignon JM, Henni T, Amselem S, Vidaud M, Duquesnoy P, Vernant JP, Kuentz M, Cordonnier C, Rochant H, Goossens M: Frequent detection of minimal residual disease by use of the polymerase chain reaction in long-term survivors after bone marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia. Leukemia 4:83, 1990
© Copyright 2024