Brand Architecture - A View of Practitioners

Brand Architecture A View of Practitioners
Marina Dabic, Günter Schweiger, Andreas Strebinger
Department of Advertising and Marketing Research
Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration
June 25th 2004
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Structure of the presentation
• Definition of brand architecture and
classification of different brand architecture strategies
• Objectives of the study and sample profile
• Hypotheses resulting from the study
• Limitations of the study
• Discussion
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Definition of brand architecture
“The organization and structure of the brand
portfolio by specifying brand roles and the
nature of brand relationships between brands and
between different product-market contexts”.
(Aaker D.A. and Joachimstaler E. 2000, p. 102)
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Classification of brand architecture strategies
Brand architecture
Corporate
dominant strategy
Dual brand
strategy
Mixed brand
strategy
Brand dominant
strategy
Endorsed brand
strategy
Brand Hierarchy: Definitions; in Keller, K. L (1998), Strategic Brand Management,
Chapter 11 Branding Strategies, pp. 428-431.
Pro and cons of the different brand architecture strategies: e.g. Aaker, David A. and Kevin
Lane Keller (1990), Aaker, David A. and Erich Joachimsthaler (2000), Kapferer, Jean-Noël (1997),
Park, C. Whan, Robert Lawson, and Sandra Milberg (1989), Park, C. Whan, Sandra Milberg, and
Robert Lawson (1991).
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Comparison of two competitors
- using a totally different brand architecture strategy despite a
comparable structure of their store brand and private labels portfolio
Store brands
Private labels
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Objectives of the study
• Evaluation of advantages and disadvantages of different types of
brand architecture strategies by practitioners regarding
- consumer market
- capital market
- labor market
- employees (corporate culture)
• Identifying brand roles in the brand portfolio
• Finding out key factors influencing the brand architecture strategy
• Collection and description of case studies regarding
brand architecture strategies
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Objectives regarding the sample
•
Different industries
– Service industries
– durable goods
– Fast-moving consumer goods
•
Variability in terms of headquarter vs. local subsidiary
of an internationally operating company
•
Variability in terms of brand architecture strategy
– Corporate dominant strategy
– Mixed strategy (endorsed brand, dual brand)
– Brand dominant strategy
•
Multiple respondents related to a company
•
Respondents from advertising agencies, brand consultants and market
research companies with regard to their client‘s brand architecture strategy.
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Sample profile
• 53 face-to-face interviews: February – August 2002
(geographical distribution: 51 Austria, 1 Germany, 1 Hungary)
Sample of companies
33 mainly internationally operating
companies
Industries: durable goods (8), fast
moving consumer goods (13), service
industry (12)
Sample of respondents
Senior marketing managers (31), executive
managers (6) responsible for brand
architecture management
9 advertising agencies
Agency employees responsible for brand
architecture management (9)
7 consulting and market research
companies
Brand consultants responsible for brand
architecture management (7)
•
Duration of the interview in minutes: 82,2
•
Related cases: 2 respondents of one company (4), company/advertising agency (9),
company/consulting or market research company (7)
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Sample of companies
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Advantages and disadvantages of different
brand architecture strategies
2. Dimension (26%) „synergy“:
Internal or external synergies (0,13; 0,34)
Brand dominant
strategy
Corporate
dominant strategy
1. Dimension (63%)
„identity“:
„flexibility“:
reaching niche markets
(0,23; 0,81);
flexible, rapid reaction to
changes (0,081; 0,73);
High communication costs
(0,097; 0,73)
Endorsed brand
strategy
Dual brand
strategy
consistence, stability (0,13; 0,85);
uniform brand communication (0,11;
0,76);
lower communication costs (0,05;
0,96);
certain target segments not
reachable (0,06; 0,96)
cross-sectoral know how (0,04;
0,92);
Low flexibility, slow reaction to
changes (0,02; 0,99);
„interaction“:
favorable transfer of image (0,18; 0,87); cannibalization (0,206; 0,59)
(contribution of point to inertia of dimension; contribution of dimension to inertia of point)
n=52 respondents; multiple responses
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Statements regarding brand architecture strategy in
respect of target markets other than consumer markets
• - Labor market: „Many people don't know which brands belong to
company X. For example, the majority don't know that brand y
belongs to our company X. So the benefit from synergies cannot be
used on the labor market.“
• + Capital market: „Our investors and the capital market favor our
brand architecture strategy because company X is a well known
company with good reputation combining everything under one
umbrella.
• - Employees: „Some employees would like the company to follow a
different brand architecture strategy because a brand architecture
strategy is very complex.
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Brand roles in the brand portfolio
• 94% (29 of 31) of the companies have at least one silver
bullet usually pointed out in advertising but often no “sales
driver”
• 90% (26 of 29) have strategic brands that are supported by
the company (may be identical with the silver bullet of the
company)
• 63% (17 of 27) of the companies have cash-cows in their
brand portfolio
• 88% (22 of 25) believe that their brand portfolio as a whole is
more valuable for the company compared to the sum of brand
equity of single brands
n=37 respondents of 33 different comanies
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Effects on the brand architecture strategy
Factors influencing the brand architecture
77% (26)
77% (26)
74% (25)
71% (24)
68% (23)
65% (22)
62%
(21)
59% (20)
59% (20)
53%
(18)
(18)
53%
(18)
53%
globalization
m arket research findings
m ergers & acquis itions
changes in consum er trends
changes in target m arkets
direct com petitors
changes in technology
new m edia (the Internet)
changes in law
busines s cycle variation
capital m arket/investors
corporate culture
indirect com petitors
global politics
labor m arket
environm ental pollution
retailer's expectations
lobby
0%
41%
(14)
35%
(12)
32%
(11)
29%
(10)
24%
(8)
24%
(8)
20%
40%
60%
n=34 respondents;February -August 2002;
80%
100%
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Some Hypotheses resulting from the study
•
Corporate dominant strategy and brand dominant strategy vs. mixed brand
architecture strategies
•
Advantages and disadvantages of different brand architecture strategies
on the consumer market vs. other important target markets
•
Influential factors on the brand architecture strategy are considered.
No modification of the company’s brand architecture strategy expected.
•
The brand portfolio of the companies is actively managed.
•
Forecast: Internationalization of the brand architecture and a rising
complexity of the brand architecture management.
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Limitations
- non-probability sample
- Single country study (mainly companies in Austria)
- qualitative research design => identification of variables,
generation of hypotheses
 Quantitative future research
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Thank you for your attention
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Sample of advertising agencies, brand consultants and
market research companies
(with regard to their client's brand architecture strategy)
9 advertising agencies
7 brand consultants / market research
companies
(2)
(2)
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research
Marina Dabic
•
education and training:
– 2002 master in economics and business administration, Vienna University of
Economics and Business Administration
master thesis: „brand architecture and brand structure – a qualitative study with
the top-management of selected companies, advertising agencies, consulting and
market research companies“
– Since Nov. 2002 assistant professor at the Vienna University of Economics and
Business Administration, Department for Advertising and Marketing Research
– Doctoral thesis: „Individualization of customers and evaluation of product variety“
•
main interests:
– Strategic brand management, brand architecture
– Motivational research and consumer behavior
– Retail brands
[email protected]
Tel.: +43 / 1 / 313 36 / 4814
www.wu-wien.ac.at/werbung
Department of Advertising
and Marketing Research