Using Employee Profiling To Win The War For Talent Presented By David Reynolds

Using Employee Profiling To Win The War
For Talent
Presented By
David Reynolds
Executive General Manager – Consulting
Chandler Macleod Australasia
Session Objectives
•
•
•
•
Define Employee Profiling
Explain its growing popularity and use
Outline the different Employee Profiling options
available
Demonstrate how organisations can use
Employee Profiling to help win the war for
talent
Who is Chandler Macleod?
•
•
•
•
•
•
Australia’s leading firm of people consultants
Established in 1959
Employ over 700 people across 70 offices in
Australasia
Specialise in people attraction, assessment,
development and impact initiatives
Focus on helping our client partners maximise
people performance and manage risk
Profile 8000+ employees each year
‘Management Speak’
“We expected that Good to Great leaders start out
by setting a new vision and strategy.
We found out instead that they first got the right
people on the bus, the wrong people off the
bus, the right people in the right seats – and
then they figured out where to drive it”.
Good to Great – Jim Collins
What is Employee Profiling?
Understanding the individual
Understanding the organisation
General Employment Trends
(Year to April 2006)
• Employment increased to 10,079,800
• Unemployment decreased to 543,100
• Unemployment rate stable at 5.1%
Employment Trends
Unemployment Trends
National Employment Forecast
May 2006 Quarter
•
•
•
•
Australian labour market growth will slow
Skills shortage and high demand = rising wages
WA skills shortage now the worst on record
State and Federal Governments issuing infrastructure
projects warnings
• Queensland and Western Australia will account for almost
half of all new jobs created
What Does This Mean for
Employers?
• In short “War for Talent”!
• Skills shortages, coupled with high demand, are driving
wages higher
• Employers and recruitment firms are finding it increasingly
difficult to find and retain talented employees
• Suitable applications to recruitment advertising continues
to fall
• Newspaper “Positions Vacant” adverts are attracting as
little as 5-10 responses
• Your competitors are targeting your talented employees,
right now!
Did You Know That…
• Replacing an employee in the first year costs up to 3 times
their salary
• Selecting a top performer can mean significant impact on
your people investment
Average
Salary
Increase in
Output
Unskilled
$40k
19%
$7,600
Skilled
$70k
32%
$22,400
Management
$100k
48%
$48,000
Job Level
Increase in
ROI
Did You Know That…
TOP THIRD PERFORMERS MAKE YOU MONEY
MIDDLE THIRD PERFORMERS MAINTAIN STATUS QUO
BOTTOM THIRD PERFORMERS LOSE YOU MONEY
Did You Know That…
• When managers were asked:
Q:”If you knew at the time of hire what you now know, would you
rehire?
A: 32% of current staff would not be rehired!
The Cost of Getting it Wrong
• Recruitment is not a perfect science…in the people
business, mistakes can occur
• The cost of hiring the wrong person includes:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Salary cost of payout/notice period
Lost productivity (of the hired person and co-worker overload)
Lost productivity (morale drop of co-workers and teams)
Re-hire costs
Learning curve ‘productivity lag’ of new starter
Re-training costs
Loss of intellectual capital
Common Problems in Selection
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Important information is missed
Applicant data is misinterpreted
Biases and stereotypes affect judgement
Decisions are made too quickly
Too much reliance on interview
Pressure to fill positions affects judgement
Interviewer’s hiring decisions not systematic
Availability of candidates affect judgement
The Case for Employee Profiling
Correct Decision
CORRECT DECISION
Suitable
Candidate
Unsuitable
Candidate
Incorrect Decision
INCORRECT DECISION
The person “looks right and is
right”
The person “looks wrong and
is right”
- obvious hire, can demand
higher salary
- missed opportunity
The person “looks wrong and
is wrong”
The person “looks right and is
wrong”
- risk avoided
- management problem
Understanding the Person
Abilities
Cognitive or intellectual abilities.
Some are learned or formalised,
others are more innate.
Knowledge, Skills and
Experience
Temperament
This information is
gathered through standard
recruitment steps
Behaviour in a particular
situation and the use of
personal resources
Based on habits, feelings,
attitudes and emotions
Interests
Effects both performance and
job satisfaction
Standard Recruitment
CM Assessment
The Formula For Behaviour
BEHAVIOUR
Performance
Satisfaction
=
fn
Can Do
(
PERSON
X
ENVIRONMENT
Skills
Knowledge
Experience
Co-operative
Working
structures
Ability
Aptitude
Performance
Management
Systems
Interests
Organisational
Adaptiveness
Temperament
Power/Politics/
Culture
Employee
Engagement
Calibre of
Leadership
Want to
How to
Motivation
)
“Management Speak”
“We expected that Good to Great leaders start out by
setting a
new vision and strategy.
We found instead that they first got the right people on the
bus, the wrong people off the bus, the right people in the
right seats - and then they figured out where to drive it.”
Good to Great, Jim Collins
“Management Speak”
% Importance of Success Factors Tom Peters
Strategy
Systems
People
Passion
15
20
35
30
www.tompeters.com/slides/uploaded/Talent50_101305.ppt
Performance & Productivity
Jim’s “Right People”…
Tom’s “Passionate People”…
Performance & Productivity: the constant
effort to increase the number of stars, get
the best from the core and move low
performers as fast as you can
The Value of Employee Profiling
Cognitive
Skills
Competency
Integrity
Initiative
Achievement
Drive
Interview
(Unstructured)
Interview
(Behavioural)


Reference Check
(structured)
Work Sampling








Narrow Personality


Broad Personality


Most useful



Ability Testing
IQ Assessment
Technical
Least useful


0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
Correlation Coefficient
Techniques to Measure Behaviour
Predictability Ratings
0.7
0
tC
s
)
al
ur
ur
)
re
ai
ed
nn
ct
io
s
st
s
io
tre
av
en
eh
st
t ru
st
Te
Te
ns
ue
y
ilit
e
(B
en
s
m
w
pl
(u
Q
Ab
m
e
t iv
Sa
ie
ss
rv
se
te
As
In
k
or
ni
s
s
it y
w
ce
al
a
on
rv
ie
en
at
rs
og
W
C
Pe
te
er
ef
od
Bi
R
In
s
Selection Method
Best Fit Concept
BEHAVIOUR
Performance
=
fn
Can Do
(
PERSON
Skills
Knowledge
Experience
Ability
Aptitude
Satisfaction
X
ENVIRONMENT
)
•Behavioural Interviews
•Work Sample tests
•Cognitive Ability appraisal
Want to
•Behavioural Interviews
Interests
How to
•Personality
questionnaires
•Reference checking
Temperament
Motivation
Employee
Engagement
The Use of Employee Profiling
• Organisations are increasingly using psychometric
assessment to select the right person for the right job:
–
–
–
–
–
Do they have the skills and abilities to do the job?
Are they motivated to do the job?
Will they be motivated to stay with the organisation?
Will they fit within the culture?
Will they do the right thing by the organisation?
Testing for Skills and Abilities
• Specialist tests
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Verbal and Numerical Reasoning
Mechanical Reasoning
Understanding Instructions
Visual Checking
Fault Finding
Spatial Checking
Technical Understanding
Abstract Reasoning
• Work simulations- including role plays, in-tray exercises,
presentations
Assessment for ‘Fit’
• Use a personality scale to assess what makes the person
tick:
– Teamwork
– Perseverance
– Commitment
– Results focus
– Work ethic
– Integrity
– Safety focus
– Motivation for the role
– Focus on detail
– How to manage the person
– Ability to work autonomously
– How to keep them motivated
– Ability to take the initiative
Employee Profiling Innvovations
CM developed the ESP, a leading edge system that provides
information on the strenghts and weaknessess of an individual in
relation to different roles in the organisation
The ESP provides a report that
includes:
 shortlist of jobs that best fit their
soft skills including a
comprehensive job fit report
 job fit reports of employer specific
jobs and local skill shortages
 Training & development
suggestions
Understanding the job fit of a
candidate and their potential for
different roles in your organisation
How ESP works
Suitability of
candidate for other
roles (across and
higher up the
organisational
structure)
Suitability of
candidate for a
particular role in
their organisation
?
Provision of
management and
training advice in
case there is a gap
between job
requirements and
the candidate’s
profile
Employability
How ESP works
Employability Skills
Initiative &
Enterprise
Team Work
Problem
Solving
SelfManagement
Planning &
Organising
Communication
Learning
Technology
Competencies
Speaking
Effectively
Assertiveness
Persuasiveness
Networking
Empathy
Understanding
Verbal Instructions
Information
Sharing
Customer Focus
Behaviours
Behaviour A
Behaviour B
Behaviour C
Behaviour D
The ability to listen and
understand spoken instructions
How ESP works
Pre-tasks
• Consent
• Moving Through the Tasks
• A Short Practice Task
• Questionnaire
Entry Level - Skilled
• Humm Wadsworth Temperament Scale
• Working with Numbers (SHL NWP2)
• Understanding Instructions (SHL VWP1)
• Reasoning (SHL DC3.1R )
Professional
• Humm Wadsworth Temperament Scale
• Numerical Reasoning (SHL NMG2004)
• Reasoning (SHL DC3.1R)
• Verbal Reasoning (SHL VMG2004)
Profiling Against Multiple Roles
Innovation Features
• Evaluation of all staff possible
• Against universally-accepted Employability Skills
• Produces Degree of Fit to Role report, not percentile
numbers
• Online, on-site, on demand
• Instant access to all reports
• Average assessment time for both entry and professional
level assessments reduced by 40%
• Assess once – apply each time a decision is required
against any role
Questions ?…