Notes constantly shifting, with different groups competing for claims as to what is “Eastern” and what is “Western.” 1. I have marked the categories of “East” and “West” in quotation marks to purposefully demarcate these categories as highly contested and discursive markers that encapsulate not only geographical spaces, but also the cultural groups that are uncritically associated (or not associated) with these spaces. Ultimately, I view these categories as 2. While the University of Manitoba does offer Introduction to World Religions, this course offering is not required in order to take more thematic courses. As such, students can take thematic religion courses without having to take Introduction to World Religions. “Weasternization” of the West: Kumbh Mela as a Pilgrimage Place For Spiritual Seekers from the West Marianne C. Qvortrup Fibiger, Associate Professor, Study of Religion, Aarhus University [email protected] doi: 10.1558/bsor.v44i2.26351 Along with the processes of globalization, the religious landscape of the world is rapidly changing. This is not a new observation. Neither is the influx of religious ideas from the East to the West.1 However, what seems to be changing is how spiritual seekers or spiritual pilgrims from the West are becoming more engaged with India as a sacred space or landscape, or as a center. India—or the East—is no longer only a place where one acquires ideas but it has also become a place that a person either physically or mentally visits2 as a part of a self-constructed religious or spiritual project or pilgrimage. It has become a place that people look to in their search(es) for authenticity, inner peace, inner balance, mental or physical healing, in order to become one with the some universal energy—or, for a few—to reach salvation. It could, of course be argued that this was also the quest of the hippies who descended on India in the late 1960s and 1970s. But what is different today are the travel patterns and the kinds of people who are attracted to this kind of pilgrimage. Today, travel is much more organized and the time spent in India is often shorter and more focused, with the spiritual seekers having special auspicious places as goals, such as the Kumbh Melā, the most important pilgrimage event within the Hindu tradition only happening every twelfth year. The number of people traveling has also grown, as has the diversity of the visitors who now come from a broad spectrum of age and social groups, religious and geographical affiliations. It is still not a mass movement, but we are getting a little closer. This fits well with Heelas and Woodhead’s notion, articulated in the very title of their book on the VOLUME 44, NUMBER 2 / JUNE 2015 topic, A Spiritual Revolution in the West (2005), where religion is giving way to spirituality and where Eastern notions and Eastern world- or life-view, which focuses on the individual not the institution, offer a form of salvation that suits people living in late-modern, individualistic societies. For Zygmunt Bauman (2000), one of the main characteristics of contemporary modern societies is that everything flows like liquid, what he calls “liquid modernity.” The reason for using fluids as a metaphor for late-modern societies is that fluids are neither fixed in space nor bounded in time, but rather they defy any fixed shape and instead are constantly changing. And last but not least: fluids travel easily (Bauman 2000, 2). The same can be argued in relation to religion and religious ideas in late-modern societies and, therefore, such religious ideas fit with what can be called “fluid religion” or “fluid religiosity.”3 This emphasizes not only how religious notions and concepts flow between people, groups and societies, but also how new meanings can be added or given to them through such socially interactive moments of “fluidity.” This doesn’t mean that everything is floating or becomes floating signifiers without any anchor or filter through which it is interpreted, but it shows that the cultural system or systems are in an on-going change or flow. This concept can go hand in hand with that of cultural hybridization, which has been employed by many post- or late-modern theorists (Homi Bhabha, Stuart Hall) as a way of transcending the essentializing tendencies in identity discourse, suggesting that identity and culture are generated by a cross-cultural BULLETIN FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGION 15 or multi-dimensional communication or better mutual impact. This constructed meeting point, which Bhabha (1994) calls a “third space,” both contains elements of and differs from the “original” cultures. This meeting point is never fixed but comprises heterogeneous elements with shifting points of views. In this way, cultural hybridity is continuously constructed in new ways and is a product of an on-going process of negotiations and identifications formed in relation to context. This corresponds to what Walter Benjamin labels a “dialectical image,” where both mirroring and mimesis are at stake (Urban 2003, 3) emphasizing on the one hand how this imaging is shaped by something that can reflect the mirroring as upbringing, circumstances, and context, and on the other hand how attempts are made to imitate new things that somehow are appealing. This can also be termed “creolization,” a term from linguistics describing the convergence of two languages creating a third, often taking most of its grammar from the one language and most of its vocabulary from the other (Burke 2008, 123). This article, with reference to fieldwork carried out at one of the many pilgrim camps (the Nandeshwar Sewa Trust camp in Allahabad municipality, during the Kumbh Melā 2013), will discuss the impact that the East is having on the West. Colin Campbell has termed this process “The Easternization of the West,” and he understands this on the one hand as “a fundamental revolution in Western civilization, one that can be compared in significance to the Renaissance, the Reformation, or the Enlightenment” (2007, 41). In that sense he calls the process a process of de-Westernization. On the other hand, he emphasizes, that just as Western ideas and practices have changed when introduced in the East and amended Eastern concepts and practices, the same is happening when Eastern ideas are introduced in the West (2007, 39). Especially the last point is important in the perspective of this article, which is the reason for suggesting a new notion: the “Weasternization” of the West, acknowledging how Eastern world- or life views and practices not only are interpreted through a Western lens so they fit Western life-styles, but are also given new meaning. I do not mean to revive an Orientalist viewpoint, but to stress that all human beings, through a process of socialization, are provided with a special optic through which they interpret the world—even if the interpretation is in opposition to the world- and life view they are raised in. As Bren16 BULLETIN FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGION ton writes, “Cultural entrepreneurs, however, need symbolic resources for such an undertaking” (Breton, 2012, 117). The process of encompassing Eastern notions into a Western context (and I could add vice versa if my focus, for instance, was on contemporary India taking Western ideas of secularization into account) is, in other words, not a one-to-one process. This is also an observation made by Mark Singleton, who in his thorough investigation of modern yoga, both in India and the West, comes to the conclusion that at the beginning of the nineteenth century, after Vivekananda had introduced yoga to a wider audience in the West, yoga was combined with Western gymnastics, thereby imparting a new and more physically oriented meaning to yoga practices (Singleton 2010). This process of reinterpretation or translation is also the case when it comes to the understanding of and participation in the Kumbh Melā, especially in relation to understanding the snaan or holy dip in the water on the most auspicious days at Kumbh Melā. This article will give examples of how this is interpreted or translated in such a way that it suits the Western oriented spiritual seeker or pilgrim in his or her spiritual auto biographical patchwork, constructed by the Western oriented mind. My fieldwork was with a small research team of six people.4 We conducted more than thirty semistructured interviews with travelers staying in the Nandeshwar Sewa Trust camp as part of the Kumbh Melā 2013. The main two foci in our interview guide were 1) the motivation for attending the Kumbh Melā including purpose or expectations; and 2) has the Kumbh Melā lived up to expectations, and if the interviewee took a snaan, why did they choose to do so? Did they feel anything in particular while bathing? The main aim of the questionnaire was to gain a deeper understanding of why Kumbh Melā in Allahabad, 2013, seems to have attracted a larger number of non-Hindu Westerners than previous Kumbh Melās.5 With this case study I hope to contribute to the understanding of how the religious landscape is moving, in particular in relation to what this article calls the “Weasternization” of the West. At the same time this article will emphasize how place seems to matter. And not only as an icon for a specific tradition— in this example Kumbh Melā as a pilgrimage spot or tīrtha for Hindus—but as an index for spirituality for spiritual seekers no matter what religious affiliation. VOLUME 44, NUMBER 2 /JUNE 2015 The Setting The Nandeshwar Sewa Trust camp was situated on the opposite side of the river to the main pilgrimage spot, at Trivenī Sangam,6 where most of the rituals, processions, and bathing ceremonies were conducted and where the different sādhu- groups, the guru tents, and most of the more local Indian Hindus were staying. The camp had an Internet site in English with pictures of the different tents and a professional international-oriented bureau that could take care of all the logistics of people’s travel and stay. The facilities in the camp were pretty good compared to many other camps. The food was vegetarian and mostly Indian, but also Western-oriented. Every morning and evening guests could attend yoga classes and āratī. In other words, the setting was prepared both to suit the well-off Indian and the Western traveler who wants a bit of comfort but also a bit of the “authentic” India. The research group who conducted the study estimated that around a third of the guests in the camp were without Indian heritage.7 These guests are the focus of this paper. Tourist, Pilgrim, Religious Tourist, Spiritual Seeker, or a Bit of All? Since the beginning of the 1990s the boundaries between a tourist and a pilgrim have been widely discussed in anthropology, sociology, and the academic study of religion (see, for example, Raj and Morpeth 2007; Ahlin 2005; Badone and Roseman 2004). Furthermore, Eric Cohen’s (1992, 50-55) structural distinction between a pilgrim and a tourist, as a person who is either traveling toward “sacred” centers (pilgrim) or toward the “other” (tourist) is now questioned. Or as argued by Badone and Roseman, the tourist is not moving from a center to the “other,” but is creating a new center in the formerly peripheral location (2004, 11). In other words, the modern tourist or traveler does not travel from center to periphery and back to the center again, but travels between centers. This process is made possible through, among other things, the Internet and travel guides, by which the traveler becomes acquainted or familiar with the place to which he or she is traveling. This does not mean that the centers have the same meaning for the traveler, but they are chosen especially because they seem to suit as a center in a particular self-biographiVOLUME 44, NUMBER 2 / JUNE 2015 cal story. This effect also seems to be the case for many visiting Kumbh Melā, or as one of our informants— a 62-year-old woman who can be categorized as a Christian-oriented spiritual seeker—put it, the whole world can now be understood as a center, or it is as if the religious center can move together with the one who is carrying the religion along: I told my family and children before traveling to Kumbh Melā: If I die in India it is okay. I die one day anyway. If I don’t see you again, we will always be connected. . . . I don’t relate Kumbh Melā to Hinduism, but I relate it somehow to Jesus. I think everybody relates it to something. But this event really integrates religions . . . yes, yes. In other words, the distinction between a pilgrim and a tourist becomes blurred. This blurring of distinctions is also the case for all other categories when trying to differentiate between various groups of travelers. It also serves as a starting point and as an analytical framework for our research on Western travelers to the Kumbh Melā. I suggest adding at least three more categories to the former distinction between a tourist and a pilgrim: (1) a religious or cultural tourist, (2) a spiritual seeker, and (3) “a bit of all.” With the last category I emphasize the difficulties in making static analytical distinctions at all and that the motivation and the participation in the Kumbh Melā can change a person’s understanding of the travel in his or her self-biography but also while being there. To look at these categories in a little more detail the following descriptions have been developed for our research project: (a) A pilgrim. Here we can make one more distinction between the traditional pilgrim and the spiritual pilgrim. A pilgrim has a particular soteriological reason for traveling. But while a traditional pilgrim travels to special auspicious places within one tradition such as the Hindu tradition, the spiritual pilgrim does not. He or she travels to all pilgrimage places in the world, where he or she believes the universal energy or something similar is present, and where the stay is understood as a step toward or maybe the place for finding salvation. Salvation can be understood both as inner peace or as salvation for the life to come. Spiritual pilgrims understand themselves as being their own authorities; they want to construct their own path to salvation and they don’t want to be subject to institutionally embedded explanatory BULLETIN FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGION 17 models. They are most often resistant to specific dogmas and have an eclectic personal theology or soteriology. A traditional pilgrim to the Kumbh Melā will be embedded in the Hindu tradition around the Kumbh Melā. He or she will refer to the mythological explanation behind the Kumbh Melā and will try to follow orthopraxis while staying there in the hope of being purified for bad karma and attaining moksha after snaan. In contrast, the spiritual pilgrim will do as he or she believes to be appropriate. Such pilgrims are attracted by the mythological story, which gives the place authenticity, but they mostly interpret the mythological story which is a particular cosmological fight between gods and demons within the Hindu tradition or as an allegory on the on-going fight between the evil and the good, which can be related both to a global fight and to their own inner mental fight. The whole setting also attracts them with the presence of gurus and sādhus. Many will be dressed in Indian clothes and wear the Indian holy colors (such as orange or white) as well as tulsī necklaces etc. Through such actions, they make themselves feel part of the energy of the place. Rana Singh and Masaaki Fukunaga (2000) call this “pilgrimage-tourism” and they understand this as a sacred journey and as a modern substitute for a religious yātrā (2000, 183). I prefer using the designation “spiritual pilgrim,” because this designation emphasizes that the tourist does not just follow in the footsteps of the Hindu tradition, but interprets that tradition in a new way so that it either fits to his or her self-constructed system of meaning or is understood as a supplement to an overall system of meaning embedded somehow in one of the world religions. In that way the journey can be understood as a sacred journey, but I disagree with calling it a substitute for a religious yātrā. (b) A spiritual seeker has much in common with the spiritual pilgrim, but differs from him or her by not being primarily oriented toward a soteriological goal. Instead he or she wants to qualify this life; or, as Merith McGuire emphasizes in relation to spirituality, “It is a sense of an individual condition-inprocess or, in contrast to ‘religiosity,’ it is more oriented toward ‘religion as lived’“(2008, 228). Religion as lived can both refer to religion as being an external guidance of daily day practice, and it can also refer to when religion is understood as something individual, private, and internal, as a voice from within, who tells the person what to do. The individual self is the focus, and the person can metaphorically be 18 BULLETIN FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGION understood as a temple or a self-reliant system that only integrates the elements from the surroundings that suit the system. Therefore, the spiritual seeker is always open to new ideas if they can contribute to or fit his or her self-reliant or autopoetic system. This is understood in a Niklas Luhmann perspective, where the individual as a system selectively takes in the elements that somehow fit the system. This is called “structural coupling,” which refers to the relation between system and its environment (Luhmann 2003). Paul Heelas’ notion of “wellbeing spirituality” (2008) is also suitable here. (c) A religious or cultural tourist can be a Western tourist traveling for the purpose of gaining a better understanding of Eastern religion and culture, or, alternatively, they may be motivated by more secular cultural interests. Also individuals from the East living in diaspora communities in the West, may fall into this category if they travel in order to (re)connect with their religious and cultural heritage. In relation to Kumbh Melā and our fieldwork in Nandeshwar Sewa Trust camp, all groups were represented. One insightful phenomenon noted was the growing number of Hindu Indians living in urban areas who labeled themselves as “secularized Hindus.”This group is important to take into account both when categorizing travelers or tourists in India and when discussing the changes happening in India. As expressed by one of our key informants, a middle-aged architect from Mysore: My main motive for traveling to Kumbh Melā – which I understand as a kind of ‘Religious Woodstock’, where Hindus, Gurus, and sādhus from all parts of India meets—was to become acquainted to parts of my culture, which I feel entirely delinked from. You know all the rituals, village people, sādhus doing peculiar things and so on. But I must confess; this experience has somehow affected me. (c) A tourist is one who chooses religious or cultural heritage places or festivals as part of their travel package. They mostly travel to Kumbh Melā in order to experience this spectacular or event because it happens so seldom. It is exotic. It is special. In some cases it is not really understandable. It is distinct, and thus it is good for the photo album. In this group, we include all kinds of professional and semi-professional photographers. This group has been critically discussed among the Kumbh Melā organizers, beVOLUME 44, NUMBER 2 /JUNE 2015 cause they disturb all the other groups when hunting down the best pictures. This is what John Urry calls the “tourist gaze” (1992). (d) A bit of all. This last category, of course, is the most difficult category to work with and to place people in. The reason for having this category is not only to find a place for “leftover travelers,” but also to emphasize that it can be difficult to place them in just one of the above mentioned categories. This category also provides for those tourists who move between the categories during their stay. As an example, we met religious and cultural tourists who did not intend to participate in snaan, but they became so moved by the surrounding sentiment that they did decide to participate and found some religious or spiritual meaning in the act. As one younger German woman noted, “Even though most of the Indians understand me as a tourist because I walk around with a camera and all that, and even though I might have understood myself as a tourist in the beginning, I now feel in my heart that I am a pilgrim.” We met similar views among quite a few travelers who admitted how their stay and especially the atmosphere in and around Kumbh Melā had had an emotional and spiritual impact on them. The Western Spiritual Pilgrim or Seeker In relation to the theme of this article, let’s turn our focus to those western spiritual tourists who all had a spiritual motivation for coming to Kumbh Melā and who nearly all have taken or intended to take a snaan. In the following, I will give examples of the kinds of spiritual meaning they attributed to the act, and use these examples to discuss the “Weasternization” process of the West. In this context snaan is not directly viewed as a way of attaining moksha, as described in Hindu mythology or Hindu soteriology, but instead it is interpreted through a Western lens so that it fits with the Western pilgrim’s cultural upbringing. Of particular note is the high number of these kinds of spiritual seekers who were part of the hippie movement or followed in its wake, while many others had parents who participated either directly or indirectly in the hippie movement or at least were inspired by the new life- and world ideals that followed. In relation to snaan, most of our informants understood this as a stream of universal energy that they either became part of or that was somehow transferred to them. Most of them expressed how they either felt VOLUME 44, NUMBER 2 / JUNE 2015 released from something or became full of a special stream of energy. Some came with the intention of being purified, to find absolution for bad relationships, and nearly all of them saw their travel to Kumbh Melā as a new beginning for a better and more fruitful life. This was well articulated by one of our informants, an older American man who falls into the category of spiritual pilgrim. For the purposes of this discussion the interview will be split into three parts: a) his understanding of being at the Kumbh Melā, b) his understanding of and expectations for the snaan, and c) his understanding of moksha in relation to taking a snaan. His elaboration of these three important aspects of being at the Kumbh Melā gives what the author considers a good example of the “Weasternization” process. The interviewee’s comments are quoted below: a) His understanding of Kumbh Melā: “It is hard to find words for it (just being at the Kumbh Melā ), it is more a stream of energy, more as being encompassed in a great womb of energy; and it doesn’t really matter what you do while you are here…but you walk around and absorb that energy. . . . And when you go back whereever you came from, this energy will start working . . . You can only describe what is happening on the physical level; you can never express the spiritual experience.” b) His understanding and expectation of taking a snaan: “I haven’t taken a snaan yet, but I can tell you what I felt, when I took a snaan in Haridwar, at the latest smaller Kumbh Melā. I felt like lifted, so elevated, and it lasted for many days. So I expect the similar, when taking a snaan here.” c) His understanding of moksha in relation to taking a snaan: “Moksha I understand in relative terms. . . . In relative terms there is something very sacred about taking a snaan also in relation to moksha. . . .We can talk about sacred vibrations and the symbolic bathing away the sins you have in Christianity and in many other religions. You know when your heart is into it, and if you are spiritual, you will get the benefits.” This interview gives many examples of how the Kumbh Melā is translated so it both fits the interviewee’s own system of meaning and also, in more general terms, a system of meaning he shares with many spiritual pilgrims or seekers from the West. First of all—and as underlined before—the idea of the presence of some form of energy or stream of energy, that flows from a kind of universal source to the individual who participates with all his or her heart (meaning BULLETIN FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGION 19 that you have to believe in it) is a consistent feature throughout our interviews; this also seems to be the case in relation to taking a snaan. Only a few are reflecting on moksha, but most of the spiritual pilgrims and seekers from the West are not participating or hoping to find a whole new system of meaning (they don’t intend to convert to Hinduism or another religion), instead they want to find a supplement to their self-constructed system of meaning or they are looking for confirmation. Conclusion By introducing the term “Weasternization” and by focusing on the Western visitors at the 2013 Kumbh Melā in Allahabad, who can be categorized as either spiritual pilgrims or spiritual seekers, I have tried both to identify why Kumbh Melā seems to attract a still increasing number of people from the West and to give examples of the kinds of meaning they attach to their stay. With this minor case study I hope to contribute to the understanding of how the religious landscape is moving in a global world—and not only in relation to how Eastern notions and concepts attract people from the West, albeit in culturally translated or interpreted forms to make them suit the Western lifestyle and ideals. At the same time I have tried to show how Allahabad under Kumbh Melā has become a tīrtha (a pilgrimage spot), not only for Hindus but also for people from the West, who in their pursuit of finding authenticity want to visit the place either physically or virtually, exactly because it is loaded with meaning. They do not have the intention to convert to Hinduism, but they either want to come closer to their own religiosity or spirituality or just to figure out if they have any at all. Place seems to matter—as a symbolic, imaginary, and empirical reality. This can be seen both as part of religious tourism mostly from the West to the East and vice versa or even seen as an on-going looping movement between East and West. In other words, Kumbh Melā, the most important pilgrimage event within the Hindu religion, is loaded with meaning, both with old or traditional meaning, which is exactly why it can be given new meanings as well. Since the place is inscribed in the Hindu tradition through myths and rituals, it is surrounded by an aura of authenticity and authority, which seems precisely to be the reason for the Western spiritual seeker to visit the place. With this example I thus hope not only to show 20 BULLETIN FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGION how religious notions and concepts are flowing among people, groups, and societies, but also how they can be given new meaning or be inserted into or supplement a specific system of meaning that the individual either reflectively or unreflectively has become a part of through their upbringing. I will, therefore, state that the world is always being read through a specific culturally implemented filter. It doesn’t mean that these cultures or systems of meanings are not changing, but they will somehow be the frameworks of reading the world. That is why I have introduced the term “Weasternization” of the West, emphasizing that even though the West or the Western world in the sense of systems is becoming more and more influenced by notions, concepts, and ideas from the East, and despite Western people finding the most sacred spots or gurus for their religiosity or spirituality in the East, these will always be understood or interpreted on the premises of the Western meaning systems themselves. Systems are changing and therefore never fixed, but in spite of this they do follow a mutually shared communicative code that is translating new forms into the meaning systems themselves in order to make them digestible. The changes somehow have to come from within. This also applies very much to easternly based meaning systems and their relations to each other and to the West. References Ahlin, Lars. 2005. Pilgrim, turist eller flykting? En studie af individuell religiös rörlighet i senmoderniteten. Stockholm: Symposion. Badone, Ellen, and Sharon R. Roseman. 2004. Intersecting Journeys: The Anthropology of Pilgrimage and Tourism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Bakkens, Tore, and Tor Hermes, eds. 2003. Autopoietic Organization Theory. Drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Perspective. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bhabha, H. K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge. Bhardwaj, Surinder Mohan. 1973. Hindu Places of Pilgrimage in India: A Study in Cultural Geography. Berkeley: University of California Press. Breton, R. 2012. Different Gods: Integrating Non-Christian Minorities into a Primarily Christian Society. Montreal: McGill-Queen¹s University Press. Burke, Peter. 2008. What is Cultural History? Cambridge: Polity Press. VOLUME 44, NUMBER 2 /JUNE 2015 Campbell, Colin. 2007. The Easternization of the West: A Thematic Account of Cultural Change in the Modern Era. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers. Davidson, Linda Kay, and David Martin Gitlitz. 2002. Pilgrimage: From the Ganges to Graceland: An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio. Dubey, D. P. 2001. Prayāga, the Site of Kumbha Melā: In Temporal and Traditional Space. New Delhi: Aryan Books International. Eck, Diana L. 2012. India. A Sacred Geography. New York: Harmony Books. Fukunaga, Masaaki, and Rana P. B. Singh. 2000. ”Performing Pilgrimage and Pilgrimage-Tourism: An Experience of the Pancakroshī Yātrā Varanasi.” In Pilgrimage Studies: The Power of Sacred Places, edited by D. P. Dubey. 185–205. Allahabad: Society of Pilgrimage Studies. Gupta, Subhadra Sen. 2001. Tirtha: Holy Pilgrim Centres of the Hindus: Saptapuri and Chaar Dhaam. Kolkata: Rupa & Co. Heelas, Paul. 2008. Spiritualities of Life. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444301106. Heelas, Paul, and Linda Woodhead. 2005. The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion Is Giving Way to Spirituality. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Jacobsen, Knut A. 2013. Pilgrimage in the Hindu Tradition: Salvific Space. London: Routledge. Lynch, Gordon. 2007. The New Spirituality: An Introduction to Progressive Belief in the Twenty-first Century. London: I. B. Tauris. MacLean, Kama. 2008. Pilgrimage and Power: The Kumbh Mela in Allahabad, 1765–1954. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ———. 2009. ”Seing, Being Seen, and not Being Seen. Pilgrimage, Tourism, and Layers of Looking at the Kumbh Mela.” Crosscurrents 59: 319–49. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-3881.2009.00082.x. McGuire, Merith, B. 2008. ”Toward a Sociology of Spirituality: Individual Religion in Social/Historical Context.” In The Centrality of Religion in Social Life, edited by Eileen Barker, 215–32. Aldershot: Ashgate. Morinis, E. Alan. 1984. Pilgrimage in the Hindu Tradition: A Case Study of West Bengal. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984. Raj, Razaq and Nigel P. Morpeth. 2007. Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage Festivals. Wallingford: CABI. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781845932251.0000. Singleton, Mark. 2010. Yoga Body. The Origins of Modern Posture Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/978019539535 8.001.0001. Urban, Hugh B. 2003. Tantra: Sex, Secrecy, Politics and Power in the Study of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520230620.001.0001. Urry, John. 1992. ”The Tourist Gaze ’Revisited,’” AmeriVOLUME 44, NUMBER 2 / JUNE 2015 can Behavioral Scientist 36: 172–86. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0002764292036002005 Notes 1. I emphasize that labeling an East and a West is a construction and not a call for essentializing. First of all, it is difficult to place an East as well as a West geographically, historically, and sociologically; secondly an East and a West are in themselves complex entities with great internal differences both nationally and locally but also between groups and individuals. I have chosen to use the notions as an overall framework and as point of departure for discussing flows of notions and concepts in the contemporary world. 2. You can also travel in cyberspace. A web site supported by the government of Uttar Pradesh invites visitors to fill out a survey form asking for details of their caste, gender, and physical attributes and to attach their picture. They then choose a date and time when this person can log into the website and see their picture superimposed as a head on a virtual body being dipped into the Ganges. In this way the viewer can experience a virtual purifying process at home. 3. Bauman himself does not leave room for religion in liquid modernity except of fundamentalism. 4. My research group consisted of six post-graduate students from Aarhus University, who did a tremendous job interviewing. Special thanks to Jacob Hartvig Sandager who has done an indispensable job transcribing all our interviews. 5. See for example MacLean (2009) who did a thorough study of the Kumbh Melā in 2001. MacLean’s focus was not the Western travelers, but she does mention them in her article as tourists who mostly want to experience this exotic other, without participating (321–22), and Eck (2012) who describes how the Kumbh Meā has attracted ever greater numbers of people over the years but the emphasis is on Hindus (153–54). 6. Literally: ”The intertwining braid of three,” where the Ganges, Yamuna, and the mythological river Sarasvati converge. Bathing in the confluence of these three rivers during Kumbh Mela is thought to purify the person who is bathing and free them from bad karma so that they may attain moksha. 7. In this article “people of Indian heritage” is understood to cover all Indians having an Indian address or passport, as well as those living abroad with Indian relatives or roots. We can differentiate between at least three groups in the camp: the Indians, the Indian Diaspora, and the Western travelers. BULLETIN FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGION 21
© Copyright 2024