CORPORATE PRESENTATION November 2014 All amounts in Canadian dollars unless indicated otherwise Advisory Regarding Forward-Looking Information and Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words “will”, “expects”, “believe”, “plans”, “potential” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or information. More particularly and without limitation, this presentation contains forward-looking statements and information concerning: NuVista's future strategy, focus and opportunities; exploration and development program; drilling, testing and completion plans, the timing thereof and the results therefrom; anticipated inventory of drilling locations and type of wells; estimated liquid yields; anticipated well economics including drilling, completion and equipping and tie-in costs, anticipated well performance and type curves, estimated netbacks, payouts, recycle ratio and estimated rates of return; plans to improve infrastructure and supply chain; plans to maintain or reduce debt; NuVista's planned divestiture program; expected future development capital; 2014 guidance with respect to NuVista's capital expenditure program, the number of wells to be drilled, production, product mix, funds from operations, disposition proceeds, debt and working capital; commodity pricing and exchange rates and industry conditions. Statements relating to "reserves" and "resources" are also deemed to be forward-looking statements, as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the reserves or resources described exist in the quantities predicted or estimated and that the reserves or resources can be profitably produced in the future. This presentation also contains test results from various wells. Test results are not necessarily indicative of long-term performance or of ultimate recovery and variations could be material. The forward-looking statements and information in this presentation are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by NuVista, including prevailing commodity prices and exchange rates; applicable royalty rates and tax laws; future well production rates; reserve and resource volumes; the performance of existing wells; the success obtained in drilling new wells; the sufficiency of budgeted capital expenditures in carrying out planned activities; the availability and cost of labour and services; debt service requirements and operating costs and the receipt, in a timely manner, of regulatory and other required approvals. Although NuVista believes that the expectations and assumptions on which such forward-looking statements and information are based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements and information because NuVista can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. There is no certainty that NuVista will achieve commercially viable production from its undeveloped lands and prospects. Since forward-looking statements and information address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to the risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general such as: operational risks in development, exploration and production; delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of reserve estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to reserves, production, costs and expenses; health, safety and environmental risks; commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations; marketing and transportation of petroleum and natural gas and loss of markets; environmental risks; competition; incorrect assessment of the value of acquisitions; failure to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions; ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources; stock market volatility; and changes in legislation, including but not limited to tax laws, royalty rates and environmental regulations. Management has included the above summary of assumptions and risks related to forward-looking statements in order to provide a more complete perspective on NuVista's future operations. Readers are cautioned that this information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. Additional information on these and other factors that could affect the operations or financial results of NuVista are included in reports on file with applicable securities regulatory authorities and may be accessed through the SEDAR website (www.sedar.com). The forward-looking statements and information contained in this presentation are made as of the date hereof and NuVista undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws. ADVISORY REGARDING OIL AND GAS INFORMATION Throughout this presentation the terms Boe (barrels of oil equivalent), MBoe (thousands of barrels of oil equivalent), MMBOE (millions of barrels of oil equivalent),Bcfe (billions of cubic feet of gas equivalent) and Ttcfe (trillion of cubic feet of gas equivalent). Such terms may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. The conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet per barrel (6 Mcf: 1 Bbl) of natural gas to barrels of oil equivalent and the conversion ratio of 1 barrel per six thousand cubic feet (1 Bbl: 6 Mcf) of barrels of oil to natural gas equivalent is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading as an indication of value. November 2014 1 We have sharpened our Focus… …Growth Model based on Condensate-Rich Wapiti Montney 1. Focus of Growth in Wapiti - Montney 2. Strong Economics - condensate-rich natural gas WAPITI 3. Early Development Phase - increasing well data Grande Prairie W5 4. Profitable Organic Growth Business Model – very large and growing inventory of development locations Edmonton Calgary OYEN Production (MBoe/d) 30 25 ~10% 20 15% - 20% 15 25% 10 TSX Stock Symbol: Market Capitalization: Shares Outstanding: NVA $1.4 Billion 138 Million 5 0 70% - 75% 28% 50% 27% 2013* Wapiti Montney 2014E Wapiti Sweet 2015E Other * Pro-forma 2013 Divestitures November 2014 2 The Alberta Condensate-Rich Montney … A sweet spot in a "world class" play 1. Scalable/Repeatable • Deposition on the shelf edge - not isolated pockets • Gas charged top to bottom • Over-pressured – low water saturation High Quality Reservoir 2. Porous and Permeable • Hydrocarbon filled porosity up to 9% (typically 4-5%) • Sand/silt reservoir exhibits much better permeability Overpressured 150-200 m thick 3. Condensate-rich • High liquids and condensate demonstrated in all our wells to date Condensate Rich 4. Thick Formation • 150 – 200 metres • Multiple developable layers of resource November 2014 3 The Alberta Condensate-rich Montney Surge in activity, new well data, new entrants • High and growing level of industry activity Elmworth to Kakwa Montney HZ Activity Update* • > 500 Montney HZ wells licensed and/or drilled to date T71 • Currently industry has 15-20 rigs drilling on map sheet T70 T69 • Many recent well licenses: CNRL, Shell and Apache and ongoing pad development by NVA, 7 Gen, POU and ECA T68 Elmworth to Kakwa Production Growth* 250 AVG Daily Gas (mmcf/d) Producing Well Count 200 T66 150 200 150 100 100 50 50 0 0 Hz Well Count AVG Daily Gas (mmcf/d) 300 T67 T65 NuVista Encana Paramount Sinopec-Daylight CNRL Seven Generations Shell Apache Producing Wells Licensed or NonProducing R10 W6 Wells R9 W6 November 2014 T64 T63 R8 W6 R7 W6 R6 W6 R5 W6 *Excludes southern areas of Alberta Condensate-rich Montney (Resthaven and Simonette). Map is an estimate of Industry Land Positions Compiled from Public Data R4 W6 R3 W6 4 2014 Business Plan – what we've done Development, infrastructure, and delineation On track to meet annual and Q4 2014 Production Guidance and Cashflow despite divestiture volumes of 2,200 Boe/d YTD Efficient capital program of $310 - $320 million is on track Development drilling focused mostly upon Bilbo area Delineation and continuation program success Significant Reserves and Contingent Resources additions as announced in August 2014 Built and started up new Bilbo Compressor Station – on time on budget Started delivery to Keyera Simonette plant with startup of Wapiti-Simonette pipeline Announced record high IP30 well results in Bilbo and Elmworth blocks Commenced pad drilling ... Time to look towards 2015! November 2014 5 2015 Business Plan Development, infrastructure, and delineation Focus on Montney Development Drilling in Bilbo and Elmworth • 60% of wells in condensate-rich Bilbo area • 20% in Elmworth • 20% wells for prudent management of expiries and delineation Expansion of Midstream Infrastructure – Keyera & SemCAMS • Keyera Simonette plant expansions • SemCAMS pipeline loop and compression New NuVista Elmworth compr. station – start up in Q3 2015 Continue Optimizing D&C Activities … and Planning continues for future capacity additions 2016+ November 2014 6 NuVista Wapiti Montney Our activity and landholdings Increasing Activity • 23 wells on production (IP30) – ramping production up through Q4 • 2-3 rigs on average in 2014 • 32 wells on production by end 2014 versus 16 at start of year Manageable Land Tenure • NuVista has over 220 gross sections of land (86% WI) • Minimal 3rd party encumbrances • Manageable expiries NVA Vertical Cored Wells T 69 NVA In-Progress Wells Pipestone Elmworth Development Block Middle Montney 'C' Silty sandstone 120 Metres Expanding Development Blocks • Strategic land swaps • Bilbo Block Expanded from 19 to 21 sections based on well results • Elmworth Block expanded from 20 to 23 sections based on well results • Delineation advancing quickly in Gold Creek NVA Producing Wells Middle Montney 'B' Silty sandstone Industry Middle Montney HZ’s 1-7 Completed 5-24 New IP30 16-1 Drilled Gold Creek 11-28 Drilled 16-27 Drilled 1-28 Drilled 80 Metres Attractive Crown royalty of 5% • Elmworth for ~3.5 yrs • Bilbo for ~2.5 yrs 19 Wells On Production 2 Rigs Drilling Lower Montney Shale R10 W6 R10 W6 November 2014 Bilbo Development Block 1-16 Drilled 7 NuVista Wapiti Montney Third party planned and unplanned downtime and facility delays impacted Q2 production 2014 Production Total Montney Production 16,000 14,000 Boe/d 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013-Q1 2013-Q2 2013-Q3 2013-Q4 Bilbo Development Block 2014-Q1 2014-Q2 2014-Q3 2014-Q4 Elmworth Development Block 12,000 Boe/d 10,000 8,000 Ramp up of Bilbo compressor station and startup of Keyera pipeline 6,000 10,000 8,000 Boe/d 12,000 6,000 4,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 - November 2014 - 8 Bilbo Development Block All future locations no more than 1 mile from existing proven typecurve producers Liquids Typecurve • >100* total locations in development area • Trend of improving liquids yields Bbls/MMcf Condensate 8 5 Butane Propane Inputs 75 Planning Prices Upside Prices Capital $9MM $9MM Raw EUR 4.4 Bcf 4.4 Bcf <$10.00/boe <$10.00/boe 38% 38% 330,000 330,000 AECO $/GJ $3.50 $4.00 WTI Price US$/Bbl $90.00 $95.00 $10.4MM $12.4MM 1.2 1.4 1.4 yrs 1.2 yrs 70% 88% $37.00 $41.00 $8.75/Boe $8.75/Boe $15,000/Boe/d $15,000/Boe/d Opex Liquids Bbls C5+ / well Economics NPV10 NVA Montney Producers Bilbo Development Block • 16 Wells with IP30 • 3 Additional Wells on-stream • 2-Rigs Drilling PIR Payout ROR Netback / Boe NVA Drilled/Completed F+D Montney Horizontal Wells NVA 3-36 Compressor and connect to Keyera (startup Q2 2014) Cap. Eff. November 2014 *Un-risked assuming 4 wells/zone/section, 80% land utilization *Pricing and costs inflated at 2% per annum 9 Montney Performance South Block (Bilbo) 1,800 24 Cumulative-to-Date Bbls/MMcf Condensate Continue to see strong condensate yield >75 Bbls/MMcf 1,500 Propane 16 900 600 12 $60 85 2014 YTD September Field Netbacks $50 Transportation Royalty $40 $/Boe Original two South Block discovery wells. Step change in curve demonstrates we have optimized fracs since then 11 Butane Producing Well Count $36.16 $30 Butane/Propane $10 8 Operating Costs Condensate $20 Natural Gas $0 Revenues Costs 2013 Field Netback 300 4 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Month Typecurve Liquids (boed) Typecurve Sales Gas (boed) Avg Liquids (boed) Avg Production (boed) November 2014 $60 $/Boe Production (boe/d) 1,200 20 9 $50 Transportation $40 Royalty $30 $31.46 Operating Costs Condensate $20 Butane/Propane $10 Natural Gas $Revenues Costs 10 Well Clean-outs Example of recent success with Coil Tubing Mill-outs 4.4 Bcf Type Curve Gas Rate (mcf/d) Tbg (psig) Csg (psig) Avg CGR (bbl/MMscf) 18,000 540 Coil tubing mill-out operation yields significantly increased gas rate and pressure 14,000 480 420 12,000 360 10,000 300 8,000 240 6,000 180 4,000 120 2,000 60 0 CGR (bbl/mmscf) Raw Gas Rate (mcf/d), Pressure (psi) 16,000 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Cumulative Gas (MMCF) November 2014 11 Elmworth Development Block All future locations no more than 1 mile from existing proven typecurve producers • >100 Total locations identified within development area • Typecurve increased from 4.4 Bcf to 6.0 Bcf Liquids Typecurve Bbls/MMcf Condensate 9 5 Butane NVA Montney Producers 45 Propane NVA Drilled / Completed Inputs Planning Prices Upside Prices Capital $9MM $9MM Raw EUR 6.0 Bcf 6.0 Bcf ~$10.00 /boe ~$10.00 /boe 29% 29% 263,000 263,000 AECO $/GJ $3.50 $4.00 WTI Price US$/Bbl $90.00 $95.00 $8.2MM $10.3MM 0.9 1.2 1.8 yrs 1.5 yrs 51% 67% $30.00 $33.00 $7.50/Boe $7.50/Boe $13,700/Boe/d $13,700/Boe/d Montney Horizontal Wells NVA 7-22 Compressor Site and Connect to SemCAMS Opex Liquids Elmworth Development Block Bbls C5+ / well Economics NPV10 PIR Payout New IP30 ROR Netback / Boe F+D Cap. Eff. • Unrisked assuming 4 wells/ zone/ section, 80% land utilization November 2014 *Pricing and costs inflated at 2% per annum 12 Montney Performance North Block (Elmworth) 4.4 bcf Type Curve 6 bcf Type Curve First 3 NVA Wells Last 4 NVA Wells 10,000 Cumulative-to-Date Bbls/MMcf 9,000 8,000 Butane $60 6,000 5,000 9 42 Propane $/Boe Raw Gas Rate (mcf/d) 7,000 11 Condensate Increased typecurve to 6 Bcf based on recent NVA wells due to frac design and other industry well data 2014 YTD September Field Netbacks $50 Transportation $40 Royalty $33.64 $30 Condensate $20 4,000 Operating Costs Butane/Propane $10 Natural Gas $0 Revenues 3,000 Costs 2013 Field Netback 2,000 $60 $/Boe 1,000 $50 Transportation $40 Royalty $30 $24.17 Condensate $20 0 Butane/Propane $10 Natural Gas $Data includes only NVA wells – excludes 1st well (9-22) November 2014 Cumulative Production (MMCF) Operating Costs Revenues Costs 13 R11 Lower Montney Activity NuVista data collection in progress Industry Hz well results coming available early 2015 R10 R9 R8 R7 R6 R5 R4 R3 R2 R1W6 • Pipestone R26W5 T71 Multiple pilot wells in progress by industry – No public test results yet T70 NVA 15-13-68-7W6 Vertical Over-pressured – 133 bbls/mmcf condy • NuVista has Good distribution of vertical wells and cores T69 Elmworth SCL 1-33-67-5W6 Confidential: 7-Jun-2015 • SCL 17-67-5W6 Confidential: 22-May-2015 • NuVista Vertical Completion: Over pressured, Condensate-Rich T68 Gold Creek Wapiti Karr NuVista Pilot possibly as early as 2015 T67 T66 7Gen 13-24-65-5W6 Rig Released: 24-Dec-2012 South Wapiti NVA Lands T65 Bilbo 7Gen 12-32-64-5W6 Confidential:15-Jan-15 Montney Wells LWR Montney A Wells LWR Montney Cores November 2014 T64 Kakwa 7Gen 1-5-63-3W6 Confidential: 19-Feb-15 T63 T62 14 Montney D&C – Drilling Drilling time and cost reduction continues… • Brine-based drilling fluids • Optimizing drill bits • Further, faster via experimentation & eng. 0 Q1 2013 AND PRIOR 1,000 Measured Depth (m) • Steady progress reducing drilling times and drill cost per meter • Transitioning to drilling longer horizontal laterals • Early adopter of new technology Days versus Depth 2013 WELLS 2014 WELLS 2,000 Steady progress reducing drilling times, evolving to longer hz section 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 0 • Measured approach to pad drilling 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Days from Spud • ~65 % of wells to be pad-drilled in 2015 ($ per Hz Meter Drilled) 9,000 Drilling Costs per Hz Meter Drilled Trend-Line 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 Wells (Chronological) November 2014 15 Montney D&C - Completions Focused on optimizing recovery Montney IP30 Progress NuVista's Completion Process • Open-hole completion with ball-drop frac technology Large volume slickwater fracs Longer Laterals With More Frac Intervals • • Manage risks of greater lengths and increasing frac density Utilizing micro-seismic fracture monitoring 1,500 Boe/d • 1,250 1,000 2012 & Prior 2013 (5 Wells) (11 Wells) 2014 (13 Wells) Water Management Progress • Flowback water – purchased disposal well and drilling multiple in-field source and disposal wells in 2015 • Water recycling pilots continue to progress Optimizing Recovery • Longer wells, energized fracs, hybrid fracs, frac intensity, high strength proppants, coil tubing millouts….. November 2014 16 Wapiti Montney Egress Access to mid-stream facilities for short and medium term egress … … and still more options for the long term Loop pipeline to existing SemCAMS K3 gas plant; expected startup mid-2015 SemCAMS compressor station on stream mid-2016 NuVista (50%) Compressor Station NuVista (100%) Elmworth Compressor Station Raw Gas Capacity – 80 MMcf/d Condensate Cap'y – 4,800 Bbl/d Potential for new Wapiti area gas plant CNRL Gold Creek Plant NuVista (100%) Bilbo Compr. Station Raw Gas Capacity - 80 MMcf/d Condensate Cap'y– 8,000 Bbl/d NuVista (100%) Compressor Station Keyera Simonette Plant Keyera (100%) Raw Gas Pipeline Capacity – 150 MMcf/d NuVista Firm Capacity – 80 MMcf/d CNRL Gold Creek gas plant Pipeline to Keyera Simonette on stream Sept 26, 2014 with additional plant expansion planned for Q1 & Q3 2015 Potential expansion of Keyera Simonette Gas Plant Condensate Pipeline Cap'y – 20,000 Bbl/d SemCAMS K3 Plant Condensate Pipeline Gas Pipeline Online Under Construction T58 Planning Stage R12 W6 November 2014 R1 W6 R18 W5 17 Wapiti Montney Processing Capacity Firm Capacity and line-of-sight to long term growth Wapiti Montney Raw Gas Processing Capacity And Estimated Equivalent Montney Production New Sour Gas Plant 45,000 180 Additional Capacity from Existing Sour Gas Plants 160 30 MMcf/d 40,000 35,000 Raw Gas - MMcf/d 140 30,000 120 30 MMcf/d 25,000 15 MMcf/d 20,000 30 MMcf/d 15,000 100 80 60 10,000 40 35 MMcf/d 5,000 20 0 2013 2014 SemCAMS November 2014 2015 Keyera 2016 17 MMcf/d 2017 0 Estimated Equivalent Montney Production – Boe/d 200 Min TOP Commitment 18 Driving down costs on all fronts Total Cash Costs ($/Boe)* $17 $16 $15 $14 General and Administrative ($/Boe) $13 $3.50 $12 $3.00 $11 $10 2013 2014E 2015E $2.50 $2.00 Royalties (%) $1.50 12% 10% $1.00 2013 8% 2014E 2015E 6% 4% 2% 0% 2013 November 2014 2014E 2015E *Includes: Opex, Royalties & Transportation and for Royalties, assumes flat commodity pricing 19 Line-of-Sight to Significant Production and Cash Flow Growth Capital Expenditures ($MM) Production (MBoe/d) $750 60 Accelerated Case Base Case Accelerated Case Base Case 50 $600 40 $450 30 $300 20 $150 10 0 $0 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2017E 2018E Debt-Q4 Annualized Cashflow* Cashflow* ($MM) $600 2014E 2018E Accelerated Case 2.0x Base Case $500 1.5x $400 1.0x $300 $200 0.5x $100 2014E *Assumptions: Base Case 0.0x $0 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2015 US$80/bbl WTI; C$3.60/GJ AECO; 1.14:1.00 C$:USD 2016+ US$85/bbl WTI; C$3.50/GJ AECO; 1.05:1.00 C$:USD Costs and Prices are inflated at 2% per annum November 2014 20 NuVista 2014 & 2015 Guidance GUIDANCE - 2014 Production Guidance (Boe/d) Actual Production (Boe/d) Full Year 17,750 - 18,500 On track Q4 21,000 – 22,500 On track Q3 17,300 – 18,300 18,030 Q2 13,000 – 14,000 14,493 Q1 n/a 17,823 Capital $310 - $320 million Funds from Operations: $110 - $120 million GUIDANCE - 2015 November 2014 FY Capital: $340 - $380 million FY Production: 23,500 – 25,000 Boe/d Funds from Operations: $180 - $200 million 21 NuVista: Looking Forward The corner has been turned … Now we grow Focused, repeatable and profitable Costs falling, condensate production rising, completions improving Two project development areas define certainty Long-term gas processing and liquids egress secured Contingent resource and reserves reports confirm upside Solid balance sheet & evergreen non-core divest program ongoing We have the Assets We have the Will We have the Team We have the Strategy… To Deliver November 2014 22 APPENDIX November 2014 23 The Montney - A "World Class" Play … EURs and investment growing, capital efficiency improving, and sub plays expanding Why is the Montney Getting Better? 1. The Scale – stretching from NE BC into AB, difficult to find an analogue commercial development of this scale 2. The Rock - dolomitic siltstones (rarely shales) and very fine grained sandstones 3. The Resource Density – massively thick formation supports multi-horizon development 4. The Reservoir – reservoir augmented by stimulation yielding better recoveries than other tight gas/liquids resources Montney Rock Type Siltstone Siltstone and some sandstone Siltstone, sandstone and some dolostone What's Happening with the Play? • Increased capital investment advancing the play from both an appraisal and development perspective 450 Miles • Technological advancement will continue to improve supply costs • Core areas within the Montney will rival any tight gas/liquids resource play in North America November 2014 Source: National Energy Board (used with permission) 24 The Montney - A "World Class" Play Competitive with US plays and increasing activity Massive Thickness: Montney is akin to stacking four separate shale plays on top of one another Lithology and Fracability: Low clay content, low Poisson’s Ratio and high Young’s Modulus all contribute to the Montney having a greater propensity to be hydraulically fractured High Permeability: natural fluid flow present because it is dominated by siltstone sized particles Higher Recovery Factors: recoverable gas volumes from pure shale plays are generally low (20% range), while the Montney is estimated to recover closer to 50% Reservoir Attribute All Montney Cumulative Wells Drilled 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Q1 Montney Haynesville Marcellus Eagle Ford Barnett Up to 300 40 - 110 25 - 90 15 - 85 25 - 180 2-10 / 10,000100,000 5 – 12 / <100 5 – 13 / 20 – 55 4 – 12 / 50 – 1200 3 – 9 / 250 88 – 90 (20 – 25% total carb – only 5% calcite) 45 – 65 (24% Carb) 60 – 80 (15% Carb) 75 – 85 (51% Carb) 70 – 90 (13% Carb) 0.18 – 0.22 0.21 – 0.25 0.18 – 0.27 0.20 – 0.22 0.15 – 0.29 50 – 60 27.6 – 37.9 22.1 – 26.9 27.6 – 34.5 34.5 – 48.3 Original Gas in Place (OGIP Bcf / sec) 150 – 280 125 – 300 20 – 100 80 – 170 100 – 210 EUR (Bcf / well) 4.0 – 15.0 4.0 – 7.5 2.0 – 6.0 3.0 – 8.0 1.5 – 4.5 Gross Thickness (metres) Porosity (%) / Permeability (nD) Mineralogy (% Non-Clay) Poisson’s Ratio Young’s Modulus (GPa) Source: RBC Rundle, Street research. DUG Canada, Chalmers et al., Hammes, et. Al., 2011 November 2014 25 Commodity Price Risk Management WTI Oil – we are well hedged Crude Oil Hedge Position 4,000 100.00 98.00 3,500 3,000 94.00 2,500 92.00 2,000 90.00 88.00 1,500 Floor C$ WTI price of $95.96/Bbl on ~59% of Q4 2014 net production 1,000 86.00 84.00 Floor C$ WTI price of $97.89/Bbl on ~40% of 2015 net production 500 Price, C$/Bbl Hedged Volume, Bbl/d 96.00 82.00 80.00 2014 Q4 2015 Q1 Bbl/d Capped November 2014 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 Bbl/d Uncapped 2016 Q1 2016 Q2 Avg. Floor 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 Avg. Ceiling 26 Commodity Price Risk Management AECO natural gas – hedging in good shape 100,000 4.50 90,000 4.00 80,000 3.50 70,000 3.00 60,000 2.50 50,000 2.00 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 Floor AECO price of ~$3.69/Mcf* on ~60% of Q4 2014 net production Price, C$/GJ Hedged Volume, GJ/d Natural Gas Hedge Position 1.50 1.00 Floor AECO price of ~$3.87/Mcf* on ~54% of 2015 net production 0.50 0 0.00 2014 Q4 GJ/d Capped 2015 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 GJ/d Uncapped 2015 Q4 2016 Q1 2016 Q2 GJ/d AECO-NYMEX Basis 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 Avg. Floor Avg. Ceiling * - Includes some NYMEX translated to AECO equivalent price hence can change slightly with Fx November 2014 27 Operating and Financial Results Understanding the financial power of the Montney Corporate Cash Flow Corporate Cash Flow Netback $35 $25 $31 $30 $27 $23 $22 $16.47 $19 $20 $15 $19.26 $20 $/Boe $ Million $25 $15 $12 $15 $11.72 $10 $13.59 $12.99 $11.42 $8.67 $10 $5 $5 $Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 Q2 2014 $- Q3 2014 Q1 2013 $50 $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $- $28.12 $16.53 Properties Total November 2014 $12.31 Wapiti Montney Other Properties Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 YTD 2014 September Field Netbacks $/Boe $/Boe 2013 Annual Field Netbacks Q2 2013 $50 $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $- $35.14 $21.57 $11.06 Properties Total Wapiti Montney Other Properties 28 Condensate Pricing Strong demand and premium price for the long term Crude and Condensate Prices WTI Edm Par May-14 Mar-14 Jan-14 Nov-13 Sep-13 Jul-13 May-13 Mar-13 Jan-13 Nov-12 Sep-12 Jul-12 May-12 Mar-12 • US condensate supply is increasing but condensate splitters are being built; and some discussion that condensate export restrictions may be reconsidered Jan-12 • Condensate in Alberta is typically priced at a premium to C$ WTI and Edm Par crude oil $130 $120 $110 $100 $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 Price, C$/Bbl • Condensate is used in Alberta as a diluent to ship heavy oil on pipelines Condensate Western Canada Condensate Supply and Demand • Condensate must be transported to Alberta – "we're on the right end of the pipe" • Premium for condensate will always reflect the cost of transportation to deliver to Alberta while demand outstrips local Alberta production … and it does November 2014 29 Advancing the Wapiti Montney Plan The track record to date 2011 2012 2013 2014YTD 1 5 16 23 Rigs Drilling 0-1 1-2 2-3 3 Annual Production (Boe/d) 281 1,265 4,650 7,325 TP+PA Reserves* (MMBoe) 12 29 86 136 0 200 (252 gross locations) 425 (577 gross locations) 477 (670 gross locations) 164 Gross 151 Net 192 Gross 176 Net 197+ Gross 179 Net ~220 Gross ~190 Net NVA Producing Horizontal Wells (Cumulative) Best Estimate Contingent Resource* (MMBoe) Montney Land Position (Sections) * See Appendix for disclosures regarding Reserves and Resources November 2014 30 Montney IP30's Well IP30* Raw Gas (MMcf/d) Cumulative to date (Oct 20, 2014) Condensate (Bbls/d) Total Sales (Boe/d) CGR Bbl/MMcf Days on Prod. (raw/C5+) CGR Bbls/MMcf (raw/C5+) Condensate (MBbls) Cumulative Sales Gas (MMcf) Total (Mboe) Current Delineation Typecurve 5.8 261 1,217 45 Ultimate 45 198 3,850 923 Current Elmworth (North) Dev. Typecurve 7.4 333 1,559 45 Ultimate 45 384 5,250 1,259 Current Bilbo (South) Dev. Typecurve 5.8 435 1,356 75 Ultimate 75 330 3,850 1,029 Well 1 (09-22 - North) 5.5 232 1,003 42 1,044 34 44 1,136 252 Well 2 (02-01- South) 4.4 231 923 52 693 38 47 1,126 244 Well 3 (16-21 - North) 7.3 379 1,445 52 620 37 58 1,274 297 Well 4 (08-15 - North) 3.9 280 909 72 646 73 61 682 191 Well 5 (02-09 - North) 7.8 356 1,601 46 605 48 70 1,273 315 Well 6 (05-33 - Central) 3.3 245 729 75 480 57 34 547 130 Well 7 (14-04 - North) 6.7 347 1,480 52 479 38 53 1,220 284 Well 8 (15-22 - South) 3.4 390 918 116 323 91 54 507 152 Well 9 (15-07 - South) 7.2 935 2,003 129 344 109 141 1,075 350 Well 10 (13-03 - North) 5.0 266 1,074 53 392 49 53 912 227 Well 11 (13-11 - South) 5.2 664 1,494 128 406 91 84 797 241 Well 12 (08-05 - North) 2.7 231 662 87 316 78 32 353 99 Well 13 (13-02 - South) 5.1 545 1,413 107 287 79 54 606 166 Well 14 (05-26 - South) 5.1 394 1,312 77 280 79 54 606 166 Well 15 (13-07 - South) 4.2 595 1,241 142 152 143 57 307 116 Well 16 (15-28 - North) 10.2 396 2,092 39 288 30 50 1,379 314 Well 17 (14-22 - South) 7.9 790 2,265 100 173 95 87 796 243 Well 18 (15-17 - North) 6.1 218 1,210 36 48 40 10 205 49 Well 19 (16-19 - Central) 6.8 382 1,312 56 134 53 28 434 109 Well 20 (13-25 - Northeast) 1.8 258 537 143 122 137 24 152 50 November 2014 *Excludes non-producing days. Well 13 and Well 14 are post-intervention 31 Montney IP30's Well IP30* Raw Gas (MMcf/d) Cumulative to date (Oct 20, 2014) Condensate (Bbls/d) Total Sales (Boe/d) CGR Bbl/MMcf Days on Prod. (raw/C5+) CGR Bbls/MMcf (raw/C5+) Condensate (MBbls) Cumulative Sales Gas (MMcf) Total (Mboe) Current Delineation Typecurve 5.8 261 1,217 45 Ultimate 45 198 3,850 923 Current Elmworth (North) Dev. Typecurve 7.4 333 1,559 45 Ultimate 45 384 5,250 1,259 Current Bilbo (South) Dev. Typecurve 5.8 435 1,356 75 Ultimate 75 330 3,850 1,029 Well 21 (04-05 - South Pad #3) 9.8 512 2,069 52 74 55 30 481 114 Well 22 (07-06 - South-Pad #2) 4.3 405 1,077 93 173 91 22 200 59 Well 23 (08-06 - South Pad #2) 4.6 712 1,379 156 83 150 40 201 80 Well 24 (04-27 - South Pad #3) 7.8 611 1,760 78 78 77 35 381 103 Well 25 (16-33 - South Pad #4) 4.9 331 1,087 67 43 62 13 179 46 Well 26 (14-34 - South Pad #4) 4.2 268 916 64 39 63 9 123 32 Well 27 (04-02 - South Pad #5) 8.3 512 1,740 61 44 62 20 262 69 Well 28 (05-02 - South Pad #5) 7.9 578 1,770 74 55 65 29 363 97 Well 29 (05-24 - North) 9.0 236 1,694 26 34 26 7 252 54 November 2014 *Excludes non-producing days. 32 Montney IP30's … Improving annually Well IP30* Raw Gas (MMcf/d) Cumulative to date (Oct 20, 2014) Condensate (Bbls/d) Total Sales (Boe/d) CGR Bbl/MMcf Days on Prod. (raw/C5+) CGR Bbls/MMcf (raw/C5+) Condensate (MBbls) Cumulative Sales Gas (MMcf) Total (Mboe) Current Delineation Typecurve 5.8 261 1,217 45 Ultimate 45 198 3,850 923 Current Elmworth (North) Dev. Typecurve 7.4 333 1,559 45 Ultimate 45 384 5,250 1,259 Current Bilbo (South) Dev. Typecurve 5.8 435 1,356 75 Ultimate 75 330 3,850 1,029 2012 & Prior Average (5 Wells) 5.8 296 1,176 53 2013 Average (11 Wells) 5.3 455 1,311 91 Well 17 (14-22 - South) 7.9 790 2,265 100 173 95 87 796 243 Well 18 (15-17 - North) 6.1 218 1,210 36 48 40 10 205 49 Well 19 (16-19 - Central) 6.8 382 1,312 56 134 53 28 434 109 Well 20 (13-25 - Northeast) 1.8 258 537 143 122 137 24 152 50 Well 21 (04-05 - South Pad #3) 9.8 512 2,069 52 74 55 30 481 114 Well 22 (07-06 - South-Pad #2) 4.3 405 1,077 93 173 91 22 200 59 Well 23 (08-06 - South Pad #2) 4.6 712 1,379 156 83 150 40 201 80 Well 24 (04-27 - South Pad #3) 7.8 611 1,760 78 78 77 35 381 103 Well 25 (16-33 - South Pad #4) 4.9 331 1,087 67 43 62 13 179 46 Well 26 (14-34 - South Pad #4) 4.2 268 916 64 39 63 9 123 32 Well 27 (04-02 - South Pad #5) 8.3 512 1,740 61 44 62 20 262 69 Well 28 (05-02 - South Pad #5) 7.9 578 1,770 74 55 65 29 363 97 Well 29 (05-24 - North) 9.0 236 1,694 26 34 26 7 252 54 2014 Average (13 wells) 6.4 447 1,447 77 November 2014 *Excludes non-producing days. 33 Focus on Wapiti Our lands contain the Montney with the bonus of significant Deep Basin uphole potential Acres 000's Dunvegan Falher Cadomin Nikanassin CARDIUM MONTNEY FAIRWAY Gross 79 81 88 96 Net 44 38 47 80 DUNVEGAN CADOTTE NOTIKEWIN WAPITI FALHER BLUESKY GETHING CADOMIN NIKANASSIN A NIKANASSIN C Wapiti Uphole Zones 7,000 Liquids Natural Gas Wapiti Montney has a younger brother: The Montney is overlain by over 1.5 km high x 100,000 NVA acres of high potential wet gas and oil Jurassic/Cretaceous deep basin formations November 2014 Production (Boe/d) 6,000 MIDDLE MONTNEY LOWER MONTNEY 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 34 North Elmworth Land Acquisition "Strong addition to the family" Announced August 2014 Recently Acquired NVA Block • Acquired 12.5 Gross (12.0 net) sections of Montney Rights for $35MM - $4,560/acre • Increases NVA Montney position to over 220 gross sections (194 net) • 3 Potentially developable layers within the Middle Montney + Lower Montney Upside • Block is contiguous and located immediately adjacent to strong and proven wells • Excellent reservoir and liquids potential leverages our Montney learnings to date • Creates opportunity for development into additional egress options • Contingent Resource/Reserves Evaluation in-progress • Up to 2 wells planned for 2015 Pipestone Elmworth Gold Creek Wapiti Karr South Wapiti Bilbo Kakwa NVA Lands Montney Wells November 2014 35 Contingent Resource and Reserves Significant delineation of resource and conversion to reserves in 2014 Middle Montney 'C' Middle Montney 'B' *DPIIP: 115 Sections – 51% of Current Gross Sections Best Estimate Contingent Resource – 312 Locations (Gross) Proved plus Probable Reserves: (23.5 Sections Gross) 66 Locations (Gross) *DPIIP: 140 Sections – 63% of Current Gross Sections Best Estimate Contingent Resource – 358 Locations (Gross) Proved plus Probable Reserves: (38 Sections Gross) 108 Locations (Gross) See Appendix for important disclosures regarding Reserves and Resources Montney 'C' CR Montney 'B' CR Montney 'C'/'B' 2P Reserves 17% of Gross Acreage Assigned Proved plus Probable Reserves 10% of Gross Acreage Assigned Proved plus Probable Reserves Pipestone 120 Metres D Middle C Montney North Central South 2015Drill 80 Metres B November 2014 Lower Montney Future Pilot Well No wells yet but significant future potential *Discovered Petroleum Initially in-place: Area includes lands assigned Economic Contingent Resource or Proved plus Probable Reserves 36 Resources & Reserves Rising Fast Independent Study Updated as of August 2014* Discovered Petroleum Initially-In-Place(1) Cumulative Production(2) 0.02 Tcfe Reserves (Proved Plus Probable)(2)(3) 0.81Tcfe Economic Contingent Resource (Best Estimate)(4)(5) 2.86 Tcfe DPIIP (Best Estimate)(7) 700 844 295 577 120,000 400 300 477 229 425 200 252 43 2012 TP+PA Reserves 174 121 100 0 2013 Aug. '14 Best Est. CR 140,000 511 500 670 Acreage Assigned Contingent Resource So Far… 613 600 698 MM Boe 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Reserves + Contingent Resource 200 29 86 136 2012 2013 Aug. '14 TP+PA Reserves Gross Acres Gross Well Count Now 844 8.13 Tcf 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 Montney C Best Est. CR Montney B Lower Montney * See Appendix for important disclosures regarding Reserves and Resources. Note: 45 wells moved out of Contingent Resource into Proved plus Probable, and 63 Contingent Resource wells added November 2014 37 2014 July Reserves Report Montney Transition in full-swing …..growth proven to be continuing 2014 Mid-year Reserves Report – GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. • Montney DPIIP increased by 40% • Montney 2P reserves volume increased by 57% • Montney 2P F&D of $11.79/Boe - YTD Netback $38.53/boe - Recycle Ratio 3.3x • Corporate 2P reserves volume increased by 33% • Corporate 2PBT NPV10% increased 43% to $1.9 billion • Corporate 2P FDC of $1.4 billion (~5x 2014 forecast capex) Corporate 2P Reserves (MMBoe) 200 186 180 50 140 1,898 507 1,600 18% 1,400 120 1,200 53 100 800 136 65 98 86 40 20 2012 Other 612 35% 847 200 0 2011 5% 1,392 1,197 400 29 12 600 42% 476 1,000 80 0 2,000 Corporate 2P Reserves by Category 1,800 160 60 Corporate 2P NPV10% ($MM) 2013 Wapiti Montney Aug. '14 87 2011 Other 167 2012 2013 Wapiti Montney Aug. '14 PDP PDNP PUD PAUD * See Appendix for important disclosures regarding Reserves and Resources November 2014 38 Advisory Regarding Reserves and Resource Disclosure RESERVES AND RESOURCE DISCLOSURE The reserves and resources estimates prepared herein have been evaluated by an independent qualified reserves evaluator in accordance with NI 51-101 and the COGE Handbook. The reserves and resources have been categorized accordance with the reserves and resource definitions as set out in the COGE Handbook, which are set out below: Discovered petroleum initially-in-place or DPIIP is that quantity of petroleum that is estimated, as of a given date, to be contained in known accumulations prior to production. The recoverable portion of discovered petroleum initially-in-place includes Cumulative Production, Reserves, and Contingent Resources; the remainder is categorized as unrecoverable. Cumulative Production is the cumulative quantity of petroleum that has been recovered at a given date. Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of petroleum anticipated to be recoverable from known accumulations, as of a given date, based on the analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical, and engineering data; the use of established technology; and specified economic conditions, which are generally accepted as being reasonable. Reserves are further classified according to the level of certainty associated with the estimates and may be sub-classified based on development and production status. Proved Reserves are those quantities of petroleum, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations. Probable Reserves are those additional quantities of petroleum that are less certain to be recovered than Proved Reserves, but which, together with Proved Reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered. Contingent Resources are those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using established technology or technology under development, but which are not currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more contingencies. Contingencies may include such factors as economic, legal, environmental, political and regulatory matters or a lack of markets. It is also appropriate to classify as Contingent Resources the estimated discovered recoverable quantities associated with a project in the early evaluation stage. There is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the Contingent Resources or that any portion of the volumes currently classified as Contingent Resources will be produced. The recovery and resource estimates provided herein are estimates. Actual Contingent Resources (and any volumes that may be classified as Reserves) and future production from such Contingent Resources may be greater than or less than the estimates provided herein. Economic Contingent Resources (“ECR”) are those Contingent Resources that are currently economically recoverable based on specific forecasts of commodity prices and costs. Unrecoverable Discovered Petroleum Initially-In-Place or Unrecoverable DPIIP is that portion of DPIIP which is estimated, as of a given date, not to be recoverable by future development projects. A portion of these quantities may become recoverable in the future as commercial circumstances change or technological developments occur; the remaining portion may never be recovered due to the physical/chemical constraints represented by subsurface interaction of fluids and reservoir rocks. Best Estimate of a resource represents the best estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the best estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50 percent probability (P50) that quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the best estimate. November 2014 39 Advisory Regarding Reserves and Resource Disclosure GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. (“GLJ”) has updated its evaluation of the Discovered Petroleum Initially-In-Place (“DPIIP”) and the Economic Contingent Resources (“ECR”) associated with the in-place petroleum. The evaluation was performed in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (“NI 51-101”) and the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (“COGE Handbook”) and is effective October 31, 2013. Notes: (1) All estimates of resources and reserves in the above table represent NuVista's gross resources, reserves or production before the deduction of any royalties and without including any royalty interests of NuVista. There is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the resources. The resource estimates presented above use the resource categories set out in the COGE Handbook. See “Reserves and Resource Disclosure”. (2) The Cumulative Production numbers represent production to October 31, 2013 whereas the Proved plus Probable Reserves numbers are as of December 31, 2012. From December 31, 2012 to October 31, 2013, total Cumulative Production from NuVista's Montney properties in the reserve report was approximately 0.003 Tcfe. For further information regarding the previously reported reserves numbers, see NuVista's Annual Information Form dated March 28, 2013. (3) The Proved plus Probable Reserves estimate is effective as of December 31, 2012 and is based on an independent evaluation by GLJ using January 1, 2013 forecast pricing. The Proved Reserves as of December 31, 2012 were estimated to be 0.094 Tcfe. (4) All of NuVista's Contingent Resources from its Montney properties are considered economic using GLJ’s October 1, 2013 forecast prices. (5) The primary contingency which prevents the classification of the ECR as reserves is pace and availability of funding. In addition, more drilling, completion, and testing data will be required before NuVista can commit to the development of the ECR. Proved and Probable Reserves are assigned to areas in proximity to proven producing Montney wells. ECR’s are assigned to areas that extend beyond the limits of Reserves. As continued delineation drilling occurs, some resources currently classified as ECR are expected to be re-classified as Reserves. (6) All of the DPIIP that has not been classified as Cumulative Production, Reserves or Contingent Resources may be considered unrecoverable at this time. A portion of the Unrecoverable DPIIP may in the future be determined to be recoverable and reclassified as Contingent Resources or reserves as additional technical studies are performed, commercial circumstances change or technological developments occur; the remaining portion may never be recovered due to the physical/chemical constraints represented by subsurface interaction of fluids and reservoir rocks. The Unrecoverable DPIIP has been calculated by subtracting Cumulative Production, Proved plus Probable Reserves and Contingent Resources from DPIIP. Since the Proved plus Probable Reserves are estimated as of December 31, 2012 and all other numbers are as of October 31, 2013 the Unrecoverable DPIIP may be greater or less that the number in the above table due to increases or decreases in Proved plus Probable Reserves between December 31, 2012 and October 31, 2013. (7) The sum of Cumulative Production, Reserves, Contingent Resources and Unrecoverable DPIIP do not add to DPIIP as Cumulative Production, Reserves and Contingent Resources have been reduced to marketable sales volumes that have been shrunk to account for surface loss. DPIIP and Unrecoverable DPIIP volumes are in-place volumes that have not been reduced due to surface loss. November 2014 40
© Copyright 2024