Canbriam Energy Inc. March 2015 Key investment highlights Prolific Montney asset Experienced management with strong sponsorship Favorable operating environment Large, low risk, high return drilling inventory Integrated development strategy 2 Canbriam Energy: corporate overview Overview Private company started in 2007 and focused on the prolific Montney formation in Northeast BC Current production of ~16,000 boe/d (~20% liquids) 2014 production 9,628 boe/d (~20% liquids) Asset map North Altares Canbriam has de-risked an inventory of ~700 highly economic net locations and established a stable, low decline production base Significantly over-pressured reservoir in the upper & lower Montney 281 MMboe gross 2P reserves (pre-tax PV10 of $2.4 billion)(1) Backed by top-tier financial sponsors including Warburg Pincus, ARC Financial, OTPP, GE Asset Management, and BlackRock b-24-H Refrig Facility 50 mmcf/d Main Fault Block b-72-A Refrig Facility 80 mmcf/d (Q1 2015) Spectra T North Canbriam 100% Canbriam Non-Montney Lands Dehy & compression Facility 10 mmcf/d 65% - 70% Working Interest 2 miles South Altares (1) Based on McDaniel & Associates reserve report dated December 31, 2014. 33 Experienced Management team has a track record of value creation Years Paul Myers President, CEO 25+ Robert Froese Chief Financial Officer 25+ Gary Gardiner Chief Operating Officer 30+ John Nieto EVP, Sub-surface 35+ Donna Phillips EVP, Corporate Development 25+ Larry Cole VP, Finance 15 Art Flaws VP, Drilling & Completions 30+ Nauman Rasheed VP, Production & Facilities 15 Sean Brady VP, Strategic Planning 15 Deep industry experience 4 Montney: significant well density & offset peer activity Petronas/Progress -Town 30 km Montney Wells Canbriam Energy Shell Progress/Petronas ARC Encana CNRL Murphy Suncor Painted Pony Black Swan Unconventional Gas Resources ARC - Dawson Canbriam - Altares Crew Pengrowth Brokers Shell - Groundbirch BC deep drilling royalty credit boundary Spectra T North Pipeline ECA - Swan 5 Canbriam: unique geology within prolific Montney resource 4 key attributes of Canbriam’s Montney asset 1 Significant thickness Could ultimately result in 3 or 4 development zones Total Montney thickness ~1,100 ft High liquids content 2014 YTD plant yield 40 - 50 bbls/MMcf ~60% condensate;~20% propane; ~20% butane 7 Tested zones Liquids rich gas Zone 1 Upper C5 C4 C3 Oil window Zone 2 C2 Canbriam 100% T1 Canbriam Non-Montney Lands 65% - 70% Working Interest Zone 3 Lower 2 Spectra T North T2 T3 Dry gas window = 3 development zones Source: Canbriam Canbriam Montney - liquids mapping 6 Canbriam: unique geology within prolific Montney resource 4 key attributes of Canbriam’s Montney asset (cont’d) 3 Over-pressured reservoir Results in higher OGIP & EUR Significantly over-pressured in Main Fault Block Downhole choke strategy enhances EUR, improves well economics, sustains liquids yield, and supports low declines 4 Sub-surface compartmentalization Leads to distinct high-pressure regions with consistent well results North Fault Block East Fault Block Main Fault Block South Fault Block Overpressure Normal pressure Source: ITG, raw data from Geoscout Note: 0.433 psi/foot = 10 KPa/meter Canbriam Montney – pressure gradient mapping Source: Canbriam Canbriam Montney – fault compartmentalization mapping 7 Large drilling inventory supports low-risk production growth Well inventory (net) +34 years of upside drilling inventory ~18 years of economic drilling inventory @ 36 wells / year 936 1622 186 686 686 321 40 107 32 Proved developed Proved undeveloped Probable Additional Upper Montney locations Additional Lower Montney locations Total derisked Additional locations development locations Total locations Source: Company data and McDaniel & Associates reserve report as of 12/31/14. 8 Significant reserve growth with high liquids content Upper vs. Lower booked locations 2P Reserve Growth 2P F&D costs & recycle ratio4 (MMboe) 55 Proven Lower , 21 Probable Upper, 25 Probable Lower, 15 226 23 Proven Upper, 118 20 15 7 1 8 21 2009 2010 42 2011 59 2012 Gas 87 2013 2014 Liquids Summary of gross reserves as of Dec 31, 20141 Category Natural Gas (Bcf) NGLs (MMbbls) Proved Developed 133.0 Proved Undeveloped Total PV10% ($MM)2 Net Locations (MMBoe) (%) 5.2 27.4 10% $387 32 680.5 27.8 141.2 50% $1,103 107 Total Proved 813.4 33.1 168.6 60% $1,490 139 Probable3 544.7 21.5 112.3 40% $981 40 1,358.1 54.6 280.9 100% $2,470 179 Total Proved + Probable Canbriam’s 2P bookings in 2014 reflect strong well performance and recognition of 2nd zone within Upper Montney (1) (2) (3) (4) Reserves are calculated on a gross company interest basis, before royalties and based on a 3 rig case through the current 5 year development plan Before tax and based on McDaniels & Associate pricing as of 1/1/15. Probable reserves shown are for the 40 Probable Locations plus the Probable component of all the other 2P wells. Recycle ratio defined as operating netback divided by 2P Finding & Development costs. 9 Stable production history with strong liquids content 60 40 30 Inlet Separator b-24-H capacity 20 10 0 Aug-13 Sept-14: Plant turnaround Oct-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Jun-14 Aug-14 Oct-14 Dec-14 2,500 Feb-15 60 50 2,000 bbls/d Liquids 40 1,500 30 1,000 20 500 Yield bbls/MMcf mmcf/d Natural Gas 50 10 Sept-14: Plant turnaround 0 Aug-13 Oct-13 Dec-13 Free Condensate Jan-14 Condensate Apr-14 Jun-14 Butane Aug-14 Propane Oct-14 Dec-14 0 Feb-15 Plant Yield (10 day average) 10 Development plan focused in the prolific Main Fault Block Exploration wells: 11 wells since 2008 Development wells: 15 wells (Dec 31, 2014) Targeting 2 Upper & 1 Lower Montney zones within Main Fault Block 7 zones tested within Montney formation Drilled within/across multiple geological faults Utilizing limited-entry, slickwater completions 15 wells currently ~80% of total production (Dec 31, 2014) Tested various completion techniques to high-grade development 10 exploration wells currently ~20% of total production 12 Upper Montney (UM) – 9 Main Fault Block; 3 North Fault Block 3 Lower Montney (LM) Anticipate additional ~20 wells through 2015 based on current plan Daily Raw Gas Production by Well – Upper & Lower Montney Development Wells Daily Raw Gas Production by Well - Exploration Wells 10,000 10,000 9 Bcf type curve 9,000 8 Bcf type curve 8,000 8,000 7,000 7,000 Daily Gas Rate (mcf/d) Daily Gas Rate (Mcf/d) 9,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Days on Production 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Days on Production Canbriam’s Main Fault Block is substantially de-risked and represents ~85% of the next 5 years development 11 Consistent well performance supports full scale development Cumulative production by well – Main Fault Block (Upper) - First 1,000 days 5,000 4,500 4,000 b-A24-H c-23-H b-34-H c-27-H b-B24-H c-B27-H b-B74-A b-C74-A b-D74-A 9 bcf type curve Cum Raw Gas (mmcf) 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 9 development wells 1,500 1,000 500 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Number of Days Flowing through Plant Well performance has consistently tracked in line with the 9 Bcf raw gas type curve 12 Upper Montney wells have outperformed type curves Type well assumptions Canbriam development well vs. type curve Main Fault Block (MFB) – Upper Montney Drilling locations(1) 7,000 284 Well properties Raw Gas Production Rate (Mscf/d) 6,000 5,000 4,000 Raw gas type curve (Bcf)(2) 9.0 Sales gas (Bcf)(3) 8.2 Liquids (Mbbl)(2) 367 EUR/well (total - Bcfe) 10.4 % liquids (of total EUR)(2) 21% Liquids yield (bbls/MMcf) 41 9 Upper Montney wells - MFB 3,000 Well costs 2,000 1,000 D&C costs ($MM) $10.2 Operating & transportation costs(4) ($/boe) 4.85 Average royalty rate(5) 17% 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cumulative Raw Gas (Bcf) Budget 9 Bcf UM (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Avg (9 UM Wells) Expected undrilled Main Fault Block locations based on Canbriam subsurface model. Type curve and liquid yields represents current planning basis for Canbriam. Assumes shrinkage of 9%. Operating costs includes all well costs and fixed plant costs. Transportation costs are ~$2.00/boe. Crown royalty rate is 3% minimum until royalty credit of $2.4 MM per well is paid out, then up to 27% (natural gas) and 20% (liquids) thereafter. Royalty includes BC government cost allowance and excludes average gross overriding royalty of 2.5% within the Main Fault Block. 13 Lower Montney well performance vs. type curves Type well assumptions Canbriam development well vs. type curve Main Fault Block (MFB) – Lower Montney 7,000 Drilling locations(1) 149 Well properties 6,000 Raw Gas Production Rate (Mscf/d) 5,000 Raw gas type curve (Bcf)(2) 8.0 Sales gas (Bcf)(3) 7.3 Liquids (Mbbl)(2) 145 EUR/well (total - Bcfe) 8.1 % liquids (of total EUR)(2) 11% Liquids yield (bbls/MMcf) 18 4,000 3 Lower Montney wells 3,000 Well costs 2,000 1,000 D&C costs ($MM) $10.4 Operating & transportation costs(4) ($/boe) 5.20 Average royalty rate(5) 15% 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cum Raw Gas (Bcf) Budget 8 Bcf LM (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Ave (2 LM Wells) Expected undrilled Main Fault Block locations based on Canbriam subsurface model. Type curve and liquid yields represents current planning basis for Canbriam. Assumes shrinkage of 9%. Operating costs includes all well costs and fixed plant costs, but exclude any cost savings tied to commissioning of c-62-A water facility. Transportation costs are ~$1.50/boe. Crown royalty rate is 3% minimum until royalty credit of $2.5 MM per well is paid out, then up to 27% (natural gas) and 20% (liquids) thereafter. Royalty includes BC government cost allowance and excludes average gross overriding royalty of 2.5% within the Main Fault Block. 14 Main Fault Block type well economic sensitivities Montney NPV10 ($M) Montney IRR $18,000 100% Upper Montney Lower Montney 90% $16,000 Upper Montney Lower Montney 80% $14,000 70% $12,000 60% $10,000 50% $8,000 40% $6,000 30% $4,000 20% $2,000 10% $- 0% Nymex $2.50 WTI $40.00 US/CAD FX 0.80 20% capital savings* Nymex $3.50 WTI $60.00 US/CAD FX 0.85 10% capital savings Nymex $4.50 WTI $80.00 US/CAD FX 0.90 0% capital savings Nymex $2.50 WTI $40.00 US/CAD FX 0.80 20% capital savings* Nymex $3.50 WTI $60.00 US/CAD FX 0.85 10% capital savings Nymex $4.50 WTI $80.00 US/CAD FX 0.90 0% capital savings Main Fault Block type wells demonstrate strong economic returns under different pricing scenarios *Capital savings includes illustrative capital cost reductions from service providers such as drilling & completions. IRRs are calculated before tax. 15 Downhole chokes have improved decline rates Advantages of using downhole chokes Enhances EUR by maintaining bottom-hole pressure Prevents the formation of hydrates when starting up wells Protects surface pipe integrity through better sand management Higher separation between casing (15 MPa) & line pressure (~3.0 MPa) demonstrates strength of the well 15.0 30.0 14.0 28.0 13.0 26.0 12.0 24.0 11.0 22.0 Sept 2014: Post-turnaround flush production 10.0 9.0 18.0 8.0 7.0 20.0 16.0 Jan 2014: upsized choke incremental 1.47 MMcf/d May 2014: upsized choke incremental 2.38 MMcf/d 14.0 6.0 12.0 5.0 10.0 4.0 8.0 3.0 6.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Shut-in casing pressure (MPa) Manages 1st year production declines and fosters stable production Gas rate (MMcf/d) Altares c-B27-H Well – Upper Montney CTD: Dec 31, 2014 = 2.520 bcf Canbriam’s use of downhole chokes optimizes its over-pressured reservoir 16 Infrastructure strategy supports large scale development 100% owned and operated Infrastructure North Altares facilities Processing facilities b-24-H: 50 MMcf/d nameplate capacity online b-72-A: scalable to 400 MMcf/d nameplate capacity South Altares: 10 MMcf/d dehy & compression facility online Existing gas sales line provides sufficient takeaway capacity 20-year permit to draw fresh water sufficient to meet future needs from Williston Lake (operator & 75% ownership of water pipeline) Source water pipeline extension & water hub facility scheduled start-up Q2 2015 Altares processing facility expansion 450 400 Potential future expansion of b-72-A to 400 MMcf/d MMcf/d 350 300 250 200 Under construction b-72-A Train 1, phase 2: 80 MMcf/d 150 100 b-72-A Train 1, phase 1: 80 MMcf/d online Feb 2015 50 b-24-H: 50 MMcf/d current capacity 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 17 b-72-A facility: scalable design for efficient development C-62-a Water hub H1 2015E commissioning Train 2, phase 2: 120 MMcf/d Sanctioning to be determined Train 2, phase 1: 120 MMcf/d Sanctioning decision in 2015 Train 1, phase 2: 80 MMcf/d Q4 2015E commissioning Train 1, phase 1: 80 MMcf/d Commissioned in February 2015 October 2014 18 Integrated water solution is a strategic advantage Sourcing Canbriam - Altares 20-year permit to access up to 10,000 m3/day of lowcost fresh water from Williston Lake Permitted fresh water supports >1 Bcf/d production Includes piping to service multiple frac operations simultaneously C-62-a water treatment & storage hub Water treatment & recycle Allows for continuous frac flow back while supplying treated water to other frac operations Eliminates water trucking in Main Fault Block Phase 2 (pipeline extension to water hub) Disposal Disposal well application submitted Closed system eliminates trucking of disposal water Cost Status Phase 1 $20 MM complete Phase 2 $18 MM ~75% complete C-62-a hub $20 MM ~80% complete Disposal ~$7 MM 2016E Phase 1 (source & pipeline) Williston Lake Canbriam’s integrated water strategy is expected to save $100 - $150 MM over the next five years 19 Operating environment supports development plan Attractive fiscal regime in BC Drilling credits & minimal retention drilling required Spectra T North Gas transmission Mile post 73 NGL terminal - PPL Canbriam roads NGLs Supportive First Nations Liquids transportation Accessible to service hub (Fort St. John) Long-term access permit in place to major water source (Williston Lake) Next to major sales pipelines (Spectra T North) Canbriam controls local roads; year round access (some spring road bans) Strong domestic demand & sufficient takeaway capacity for liquids production Fort St. John Canbriam water pipeline Taylor condensate terminal PPL Williston Lake Station 2 – Spectra Canbriam enjoys a low royalty burden in BC, a positive working relationship with stakeholders and easy access to operating infrastructure 20 Strategies to enhance operational performance 1 Small footprint 3 Surface Pad drilling minimizes surface disturbance and lowers D&C costs per well Limited entry slickwater frac completions Surface Casing (~250-500m) Up to 18 well pads (5 wells per GSU per zone); many are already built Development focused on 3 most commercial zones Charlie Lake Halfway Doig Intermediate Casing (7” ~1,650m) Isolation - Pumpdown flow through plugs Perf Clusters/Spacing - 3-5 clusters - 20-30 meter spacing Production Casing (4.5” to TD) Montney Belloy 2 Limited entry slickwater frac completions increases operational efficiency Perf design: # of clusters/cluster design, # of stages (15-24 typically), cluster spacing (20-30m) Sand concentration: 1.2-1.25 tonnes/meter (800-840 lbs/ft) Water Volume: 800 – 1,200 m3/stage Pump Rate/Pressure: 8-12m3/minute to maintain 55-60 mPa pressure Managed pressure drilling Reduced mud weight improves fluid flow rates and results in higher rates of penetration 4 Well spacing Tighter well spacing (~200M between well pairs) improves recovery factors The wells on this pad are producing independently of each other Porosity Property A variation of Permeability Property Initial Reservoir Pressure 21 Key investment highlights Prolific Montney asset Large, low risk, high return drilling inventory Integrated development strategy Favorable operating environment Experienced management with strong sponsorship Prolific EUR/well with ~1,100’ of Montney vertical thickness on ~61,000 (~50% liquids rich) net acres 168.6 mmboe of gross 1P Reserves (pre-tax PV10 of $1,490 million)(1) 280.9 mmboe of gross 2P Reserves (pre-tax PV10 of $2.470 million)(1) 100% working interest and operatorship in core lands 686 net locations in the Altares development area representing ~18 years of drilling inventory High reservoir pressure and use of down-hole chokes limits declines and facilitates rapid growth Profitable in a ~US$2.50 NYMEX pricing environment Extensive operating experience in the B.C. Montney Canbriam’s success tied to early quality differentiation within Altares region Processing facilities are 100% owned & operated; scalable infrastructure supports efficient development Team approach fosters culture of collaboration, safety & high performance Prudent approach to financial management supports solid financial position 100%-owned gathering and processing facilities under expansion to 130 mmcf/d capacity (~25,000 boe/d with liquids) in Q1 2015 and 210 mmcf/d capacity (~40,000 boe/d with liquids) by year-end 2015 Long term access to water: 20 year permit to withdraw 10,000m 3 per day from Williston Lake Low population density, favorable regulatory regime & proximity to gas sales pipeline Year round access (activity reduced during 3 month spring thaw period) Management team averages 25 years of industry experience with prominent E&P companies Team was built specifically to be able to find and develop sweet spots within unconventional fairways Experienced E&P sponsors including Warburg Pincus, ARC, OTPP, GE and BlackRock (1) Based on McDaniel & Associates reserve report dated December 31, 2014. 22 Supplemental information Canbriam’s integrated development strategy Sub-surface & operations Infrastructure Management • Canbriam’s success tied to early quality differentiation within Altares region • Processing facilities are 100% owned & operated • Team approach fosters culture of collaboration, safety & high performance • Approach to reservoir characterization & evaluation is a sustainable advantage • Geology, Geophysics & Reservoir engineering integrated with Drilling & Completions in real time • High degree of control & scalable design supports full scale development • Maintain, operate & patrol all roads within Altares region • Long-term approach to water sourcing, handling & recycling • Prudent approach to financial management supports solid financial position • Proactive approach to First Nations and all stakeholders Canbriam has built the foundation for profitable, long-term development within the Montney 24 b-72-A facility: scalable design for efficient development September 4, 2014 December 19, 2014 February 13, 2015 commissioned 25 Robust historical netbacks ($/boe) $35.88 Realized price: Cash royalties $29.58 $0.70 $33.23 $0.88 $4.04 $1.37 $3.34 $3.41 $1.97 $6.56 Operating expenses $1.09 Transportation expenses $26.94 $27.16 2013 2014 $3.59 $90.76 $3.53 $72.48 $4.63 $76.90 $2.80 $2.26 $2.17 $3.67 $3.01 $2.96 $4.41 $4.27 $3.90 $21.23 Cash operating netback 2012 Realized prices Natural gas ($/mcf) NGLs ($/bbl) Benchmark prices Henry Hub (US$/mmbtu) AECO ($/GJ) Station 2 ($/GJ) Strong netbacks result from liquids component & low cost structure 26 Supplemental reserves information Reserves Reconciliation (1) Proved Probable Proved + Probable Natural Gas NGLs Total Natural Gas NGLs Total Natural Gas NGLs Total Bcf MMbbls MMboe Bcf MMbbls MMboe Bcf MMbbls MMboe 217 10 46 302 13 64 519 23 110 Extensions & Improved Recovery 339 14 71 380 15 78 719 29 149 Technical Revisions 274 9 55 (137) (7) (29) 137 3 26 Discoveries - - - - - - - - - Acquisitions - - - - - - - - - Dispositions - - - - - - - - - Economic Factors - - - - - - - - - (17) (1) (3) 0 0 0 (17) (1) (3) 813 33 169 545 22 112 1,358 55 281 December 31, 2013 Production December 31, 2014 Summary of Future Development Costs(2) December 31, 2013 Changes December 31, 2014 (1) (2) Proved Probable Proved + Probable Million Million Million $367 $393 $759 $1,031 $154 $1,185 $1,397 $546 $1,944 Reserves are calculated on a gross company interest basis, before royalties and based on a 3 rig case through the current 5 year development plan Undiscounted, as calculated by McDaniels & Associate as of 12/31/14 based on a 3 rig case through the current 5 year development plan 27 Hedge positions & composition of total liquids production Natural gas hedges (January 31, 2015 ) Liquids hedges (January 31, 2015) bbls/d M Gj/d 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 $5.00 $3.13 $3.02 $4.00 $3.26 3,500 $120.00 $97.35 $96.82 3,000 2,500 $3.00 $2.00 $80.00 2,000 1,500 $40.00 1,000 $1.00 $0.00 2015 2016 500 0 $0.00 2015 2017 2016 Volume hedged WTI weighted average price (C$/bbl) Volume hedged AECO weighted average price (C$/gj) 2014 Production Production Revenue Pricing* (%) (%) (% WTI) Butane (bbl/d) 359 4% 5% 45 - 50% Propane (bbl/d) 356 4% 2% 15 - 20% Condensate (bbl/d) 1,102 11% 30% 90 - 95% Natural gas (MMcf/d) 46.9 81% 63% - Total (boe/d) 9,628 100% 100% *Ignores FX impact on realized pricing. Condensate include pentanes plus production. 28 Upper Montney – Main Fault Block well data Daily raw gas production by well – Upper Montney Main Fault Block development wells 10,000 b-A24-H 9,000 b-B24-H 8,000 c-23-H 7,000 Daily Gas Rate (mcf/d) c-27-H 6,000 b-34-H 5,000 c-B27-H 4,000 9 Bcf type curve 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Days on Production Our near term development plan is focused primarily in the Main Fault Block 29 Forward-looking information Certain statements included in this presentation constitute forward‐looking statements or forward‐looking information under securities legislation. Such forward‐looking statements or information are provided for the purpose of providing information about management's current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that reliance on such information may not be appropriate for other purposes, such as making investment decisions. Forward‐looking statements or information typically contain words such as "anticipate", "believe", "expect", "plan", "intend", "estimate", "propose", "project" or similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook. Forward‐looking statements or information concerning Canbriam in this presentation may include, but are not limited to, statements or information with respect to: future production levels and the expected timing for the achievement thereof; business strategy and objectives; expected resource potential and future reserves; development and exploration plans and the timing and results thereof; the development of and access to pipelines; the potential future development of LNG export facilities and Canbriam's ability to supply such projects. Forward‐looking statements or information are based on a number of factors and assumptions which have been used to develop such statements and information but which may prove to be incorrect. Canbriam believes that the expectations reflected in such forward‐looking statements or information are reasonable; however, undue reliance should not be placed on forward‐looking statements because Canbriam can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. In addition to other factors and assumptions which may be identified in this presentation, assumptions have been made regarding, among other things: the impact of increasing competition; the timely receipt of any required regulatory approvals; the ability of Canbriam to obtain qualified staff, equipment and services in a timely and cost efficient manner; the ability of Canbriam to obtain financing on acceptable terms; field production rates and decline rates; the ability to replace and expand reserves through acquisition, development or exploration; the timing and costs of operating Canbriam’s business; the ability of Canbriam to secure adequate product transportation, including access to pipelines and potential LNG export facilities; future oil and natural gas prices; currency, exchange and interest rates; the regulatory framework regarding royalties, taxes and environmental matters; and the ability of Canbriam to successfully market its oil and natural gas products. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list is not exhaustive of all factors and assumptions which have been used. Forward‐looking statements or information are based on current expectations, estimates and projections that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by Canbriam and described in the forward‐looking statements or information. These risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward‐looking statements or information. The material risk factors affecting Canbriam include, without limitation, the accuracy of reserves and resources estimates; reliance on key personnel; general economic conditions; volatility in global market prices for oil and natural gas; competition; liabilities and risks, including environmental liability and risks, inherent in oil and gas operations; the availability of capital; alternatives to and changing demand for petroleum products; changes in legislation and the regulatory environment, including uncertainties with respect to environmental legislation; title defects which may adversely affect Canbriam; the availability of drilling and related equipment in the particular areas where such activities will be conducted; constraints related to product transportation; relationships with First Nations in areas in which Canbriam operates; Canbriam's dependence on third parties; and other known or unknown factors. The forward‐looking statements or information contained in this presentation are made as of the date hereof and Canbriam undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward‐looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise unless required by applicable securities laws. The forward‐looking statements or information contained in this presentation are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. 30 RESOURCE. INNOVATION. COLLABORATION. Canbriam Energy Inc. 3500, 450 1st Street SW Calgary, AB Canada T2P 5H1 [email protected] Tel: 403.269.2874 Fax: 403.269.7637 www.canbriam.com Paul Myers President & Chief Executive Officer [email protected] Rob Froese Chief Financial Officer [email protected] Bill Stait Director, Investor Relations 403.718.8564 [email protected]
© Copyright 2024