Cardiovascular Research 59 (2003) 538–548 www.elsevier.com / locate / cardiores Review The cardiovascular effects of erythropoietin Kyle J. Smith, Anthony J. Bleyer, William C. Little, David C. Sane* Sections of Cardiology and Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157 -1045, USA Received 13 March 2003; received in revised form 14 May 2003; accepted 2 June 2003 Abstract Keywords: Angiogenesis; Endothelial function; Platelets; Renal function; Thrombosis / embolism 1. Introduction The introduction of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) in 1989 marked a significant advance in the management of anemia in end stage renal disease (ESRD). Erythropoietin therapy is associated with an enhanced quality of life [1], cognitive function, and activity level [2] in ESRD patients. Non-dialysis indications include use in patients with chronic renal failure not on dialysis with a hematocrit less than 30%, treatment of anemia in zidovudine-treated HIV-infected patients, and use in patients with non-myeloid malignancies on chemotherapy [3]. The use of erythropoietin has broadened to include patients with anemia from a variety of etiologies including myelodysplastic syndromes [4], prematurity [5], as prophylactic therapy to prevent anemia after surgery [6] and to reduce blood transfusions to patients in intensive care units [7]. Along with broader usage, there has been a trend *Corresponding author. Tel.: 11-336-716-7533; fax: 11-336-7169188. E-mail address: [email protected] (D.C. Sane). towards increased doses of rHuEpo per patient. The mean rHuEpo dose increased by 107–139% between 1990 and 1996 [8]. Recently, a new longer acting form of recombinant erythropoietin has become available [9]. Preliminary studies suggest that erythropoietin therapy is beneficial and safe in patients with CHF and anemia. Nevertheless, the risk-to-benefit ratio of erythropoietin could be higher outside the ESRD arena. For example, whereas renal failure is associated with a bleeding diathesis [10], heart failure may exhibit a neutral hemostatic balance or even a pro-thrombotic state. Thus, as the potential uses of erythropoietin therapy increases, it is important to reconsider its cardiovascular effects. 2. Biology of erythropoietin Erythropoietin (Epo) has similar structure and signaling mechanisms to the family of type I cytokines [11] and is markedly induced by hypoxia [12]. Erythropoietin is synthesized by peritubular cells in the cortex-medullary Time for primary review 27 days. 0008-6363 / 03 / $ – see front matter 2003 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016 / S0008-6363(03)00468-1 Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 Erythropoietin is a hypoxia-induced hormone that is essential for normal erythropoiesis. The production of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) has revolutionized the treatment of anemia associated with chronic renal failure and chemotherapy, and has been used as prophylaxis to prevent anemia after surgery. The erythropoietin receptor is widely distributed in the cardiovascular system, including endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and cardiomyocytes. Epo has potentially beneficial effects on the endothelium including anti-apoptotic, mitogenic and angiogenic activities. On the other hand, some reports suggest that rHuEpo may have pro-thrombotic or platelet-activating effects. Hypertension develops in 20–30% of renal patients treated with rHuEpo. Many patients with heart failure have anemia. Despite some potential adverse effects, early studies in heart failure patients with anemia suggest that rHuEpo therapy is safe and effective in reducing left ventricular hypertrophy, enhancing exercise performance and increasing ejection fraction. Further studies are warranted to define the role of rHuEpo in chronic heart failure and other cardiovascular settings. 2003 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. K. J. Smith et al. / Cardiovascular Research 59 (2003) 538–548 border of the kidney [13] and in the liver during fetal and neonatal development [14]. A variety of other tissues have been reported to express erythropoietin including bone marrow macrophages [15], trophoblasts [16], breast glands [17], and astrocytes [18]. 3. Novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein 3.1. Erythropoietin receptor ( EpoR) EpoR is a transmembrane (type I) receptor with a WSXWS motif in the extracellular domain. It belongs to the cytokine receptor superfamily and consists of eight exons (extracellular domains: 1–5; membrane spanning domain: 6; intracellular domains: 7, 8) [21]. The intracellular domain does not possess any kinase activity. Epo induces homodimerization of EpoR, with subsequent activation of the receptor associated Janus kinase 2 [22], leading to tyrosine phosphorylation of EpoR, signal transducer and activator of transcription factor 5 (Stat 5) [23], as well as a variety of other targets (Fig. 1). A number of proteins with Src homology 2 (SH2) domains such as PI3 kinase become associated and are activated. PI3 kinase suppresses apoptosis via activation of its downstream effector Akt [24]. The Epo–EpoR interaction also leads to activation of ras / MAPK pathways [25], and to activation of nuclear factor-kB dependent transcription [26]. There may be tissue or cell specific responses to Epo. For example, it has been reported that MAP kinase, but not JAK2-STAT5, is activated by exposure of rat VSMC to Epo [27]. One of the major effects of the Epo–EpoR interaction is a rise in intracellular calcium levels. Epo binding to EpoR leads to phosphorylation of PLC-g1 [28]. PLC-g1 is then translocated from the cytosol to the plasma membrane, where it forms a complex with the EpoR. PLC-g1 activation leads to PIP2 hydrolysis with the generation of IP3 , which in turn induces the release of Ca 21 from intracellu- lar stores and triggers 1 pS Ca 21 channel activity, which is sustained by the extracellular Ca 21 entry through the channel itself [28]. Calcium channel proteins may also become phosphorylated during the EpoR mediated activation [29]. In addition to erythroid precursors [30], EpoR is also expressed on megakaryocytes [31], VSMC [27,32], endothelial cells [32–34], skeletal myoblasts [35], neuronal cells [36], kidney cells [37], breast carcinoma [38] and ischemic retinal cells [39]. In the heart the EpoR is expressed in the epicardium and pericardium [40]. A soluble form of EpoR (containing exons 1–4) has been described, resulting from alternate splicing [41,42]. Soluble EpoR has been suggested to contribute to resistance to erythropoietin therapy [43], or to ineffective erythropoiesis in myelodysplastic syndromes [44]. 4. Erythropoietin and thrombosis One of the potential side effects of erythropoietin therapy is an increase in thrombotic events. In a prospective trial, 618 dialysis patients were randomized to achieve a target hematocrit of 42% versus a target hematocrit of greater than 30% in 615 control patients [45]. After 29 months, the relative risk of death in the high hematocrit group was 1.3 (95% confidence interval 0.9–1.9), and the trial was stopped. Factors such as exposure to intravenous iron and decreased dialysis adequacy may have been contributory, but the increased doses of erythropoietin could also explain this result [45]. An increase in cardiovascular events, including vascular access thrombosis, stroke and myocardial infarction, has been associated with a rapid rate of rise in hemoglobin [19]. In the Canadian Multicenter study, the overall rate of thrombosis was 0.28 / patient year in rHuEpo treated patients versus 0.05 / patient year in controls [46]. In retrospective studies of patients receiving chronic hemodialysis, rHuEpo therapy resulted in a higher rate of PTFE graft thrombosis [47]. Darbepoetin alpha results in an increased rate of thrombotic events, including pulmonary embolism when administered to patients receiving chemotherapy [48]. The concerns regarding thrombosis have been evaluated in an animal model. RHuEpo administration resulted in a nearly 3-fold increase in the content of platelets in the thrombi in an A–V shunt model, which reverted to normal after cessation of erythropoietin administration [49]. A variety of mechanisms have been cited for increased thrombosis with erythropoietin therapy [50]. Erythrocytosis has been associated with thrombosis in young healthy athletes [51], possibly because of increased blood viscosity [52] or an enhancement of platelet attachment to the subendothelium [53]. RHuEpo therapy has been reported to shorten the bleeding time even before the correction of anemia [54], indicating that the elevation of hematocrit cannot explain this effect. Some studies have Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 Novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein (NESP, Aranesp ) was designed and expressed using recombinant DNA technology [9]. NESP has several amino acid substitutions, creating two new consensus N-linked carbohydrate attachment sites, which result in five oligosaccharide chains in NESP compared with three on rHuEpo. NESP binds to the same receptor as does rHuEpo, although at slightly reduced affinity [9]. The major benefit of NESP is an increase in the serum half-life by approximately 3-fold over rHuEpo (25.3 vs. 8.5 h). NESP can be administered weekly or every other week [9,19]. The adverse events reported with NESP, including rates of hypertension and vascular access thrombosis have been similar to those with rHuEpo. Although NESP has several amino acid substitutions, no neutralizing antibodies have been detected, as has been reported for epoetin [20]. 539 540 K. J. Smith et al. / Cardiovascular Research 59 (2003) 538–548 found an increase in vWF, manifest as increased ristocetininduced platelet aggregation [54] after rHuEpo therapy. Factor VIII antigen has also been increased in some studies [55]. Enhanced thrombin generation has also been reported after rHuEpo therapy, manifest as an increase in the TAT complex in rHuEpo-treated dialysis patients, which peaked at 2 months of therapy [56]. The increment in TAT was comparable to that observed with myocardial infarction and was higher than that reported in DVT or DIC [56]. Lower levels of protein C and S have been reported after rHuEpo therapy, which could contribute to elevated prothrombotic markers [54,57]. Macdougall et al. [57] reported a reduction in total and free protein S, as well as protein C after initiation of rHuEpo. Protein C levels at baseline were 84.3% but decreased to 66.4% at 4 months, and returned to baseline at 8 months [57]. Total protein S decreased from 124.1% to 68.3% at 4 months and returned to baseline at 8–12 months. A similar incremental reduction was noted in free protein S. However, other studies have found minimal or no adverse effects on hemostasis parameters [50]. In a group of 17 patients with renal anemia including dialysis and predialysis patients, a variety of coagulation parameters were assessed before and at 3 months and 1 year after beginning erythropoietin therapy [58]. The only significant change noted was a decrease in the total level of protein S at 3 months (from 131% to 120%), a change that did not persist at 1 year [58]. Marchi et al. [59] studied 30 hemodialysis patients with native AV fistulae, 16 receiving rHuEpo and 14 receiving a placebo, with a prospective 3-year follow-up. There were no differences in the rates of stenosis of AV fistulae in the two groups. Furthermore, the rHuEpo-treated group did not have a significant difference in F112, Factor VII, Factor XII, t-PA antigen, PAI-1 Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 Fig. 1. Simplified diagram of erythropoietin-induced signal transduction. Erythropoietin induces homodimerization of the Epo receptor, with subsequent activation and phosphorylation of JAK2. JAK2 phosphorylates EpoR providing docking sites for a variety of signaling molecules. STAT5 and PI3-K bind to phosphorylated tyrosine residues on EpoR and are themselves activated by phosphorylation. Phosphorylated STAT5 forms a dimer which enters the nucleus and induces transcription of target genes. PI3-K activates Akt, which inhibits apoptosis. Epo binding to EpoR also induces the activation of RAS and PLC-g1. When PLCg1 is phosphorylated, it moves from the cytosol to the plasma membrane, where it hydrolyzes PIP2 to form IP3 . IP3 induces the release of Ca 21 from intracellular stores, which in turn enhances extracellular Ca 21 entry through channel channels. K. J. Smith et al. / Cardiovascular Research 59 (2003) 538–548 antigen, D-dimer, fibrinogen, protein C and S activities compared with the placebo-treated group [59]. 5. Effects on platelets Table 1 Cellular effects of erythropoietin Platelets Increased production of microparticles Enhanced platelet activation Vascular endothelium Mitogenic, chemotacticy and angiogenic effect Increased endothelin production Increased PAI-1 production Vascular smooth muscle Raises cytosolic Ca 21 concentration Increases responses to norepinephrine, angiotensin II, and endothelin-1 Mitogenic effect Cardiomyocytes Enhances proliferation (neonatal) Stimulates Na 1 ,K 1 activity The effects of Epo on cellular components of the cardiovascular system are summarized. Epo binds to megakaryocytes, where it may contribute to megakaryocyte maturation [31]. In patients treated with rHuEpo, the platelet count may increase by 10–20% [66] or substantially more in thrombocytopenic patients with chronic liver disease [67]. Recent data from a porcine model suggest that even modest rises in platelet count can increase the propensity for arterial thrombosis [68]. RHuEpo therapy has been reported to increase the mean platelet volume [69] with larger platelets being more active than smaller platelets [70]. 6. Erythropoietin effects on the vascular endothelium Binding studies with radio-iodinated recombinant human erythropoietin demonstrated approximately 27 000 receptors per endothelial cell with a Kd in the nanomolar range [34]. Epo has a mitogenic and chemotactic effect on HUVEC and bovine adrenal capillary endothelial cells [34] (Table 1). Furthermore, Epo induces MMP-2 production, proliferation and tube formation in EA.hy926 cells [71]. These effects likely contribute to the ability of Epo to induce angiogenesis [71–74]. Using small pieces of human myocardial tissue, Jaquet et al. demonstrated that Epo was equally effective to VEGF in promoting capillary outgrowth [74]. Epo stimulates the production of endothelin [75], an effect that is additive with Ang II or thrombin [72]. Epo also induces the production of PAI-1 in cultured HUVEC [33]. Six proteins have been identified that are tyrosine phosphorylated following stimulation of cultured HUVEC with rHuEpo. Of these proteins (94, 70, 42, 40, 29 and 25 kDa), one has been identified as STAT5 [76]. A differential display analysis of genes up-regulated in human vascular endothelium has been performed [77]. Eight genes were identified that were up-regulated by rHuEpo. These included (i) proteins with vascular functions— thrombospondin-1 and myosin regulatory light chain; (ii) genes involved in gene transcription and / or translation (c-myc purine-binding transcription factor PuF, tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase, S19 ribosomal protein); (iii) subunits of mitochondrial proteins related to energy transfer (NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6, cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1); and (iv) protein tyrosine phosphatase G1, a regulator of signal transduction [77,78]. There is evidence for the activation of the endothelium in vivo following intravenous rHuEpo administration [66]. In healthy male volunteers given rHuEpo 100 or 500 U / kg three times weekly, there was a dose dependent increase in soluble E-selectin, with an increase of more than 100% in the 500 U / kg dose group and a significant, though smaller increase in the low dose group. RHuEpo infusion also increased soluble VCAM-1 but not soluble ICAM-1 [66]. Although the clinical consequences of this endothelial activation are unknown, it is possible that enhanced thrombogenicity could occur in patients with atherosclero- Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 Several studies have documented a decrease in the bleeding time of dialysis patients after initiation of rHuEpo therapy [54,60]. Although this response could be due to changes in the vessel wall or circulating proteins, several lines of evidence suggest that at least part of the response is from direct action on platelets. Hemodialysis patients undergoing rHuEpo therapy have increased spontaneous platelet aggregation in whole blood (Table 1), which reverses by withdrawing erythropoietin and can be inhibited by aspirin administration [61]. Erythropoietin therapy in uremic rats leads to a normalization of the defect in thrombin stimulated rise in platelet calcium influx [62]. RHuEpo therapy was associated with increased Ca 21 uptake and increased Ca 21 stores in the platelets [62]. Erythropoietin therapy of uremic patients improves the intraplatelet signaling induced by thrombin through tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins associated with the cytoskeleton [63]. Enhanced transient platelet reactivity has been observed in dialysis patients treated with rHuEpo [64] and may contribute to a pro-thrombotic effect. Ando and colleagues [65] reported elevated platelet microparticles (PMP) in uremic pre-dialysis patients and ESRD patients compared to healthy controls [65]. The use of Epo in dialysis patients was associated with a significantly higher PMP count compared to untreated patients [65]. The infusion of rHuEpo at 100 U or 500 U / kg in normal healthy male volunteers resulted in increased percentages of P-selectin and CD63-positive platelets after stimulation by TRAP [66]. Furthermore, circulating levels of soluble P-selectin were also elevated, consistent with increased in vivo platelet activation [66]. 541 542 K. J. Smith et al. / Cardiovascular Research 59 (2003) 538–548 sis or a history of thrombotic disorders. To evaluate the effect of Epo on endothelial function in an animal model, rabbits were given erythropoietin for 1 week [79]. Blood pressure and vascular resistance were significantly less responsive to endothelium dependent vasodilators after rHuEpo therapy [79]. Responses to endothelium-independent vasodilators did not change with rHuEpo therapy. These observations suggest that rHuEpo may selectively suppress endothelial NO synthase activity. This finding is in agreement with studies of cultured human endothelial cells in which incubation with rHuEpo decreased basal and ACh-stimulated NO production, and depressed NO synthetase expression [80]. Although the direct effect of Epo on the vascular endothelium may suppress NO synthetase, there appears to be a compensatory increase in NO production when Epo-induced erythrocytosis occurs. Transgenic mice that overexpress human erythropoietin have higher plasma nitrate levels than control mice [81], a factor that helps prevent thrombosis despite a high hematocrit (0.85). Similarly, rats with erythrocytosis induced by exogenous erythropoietin administration have enhanced NO production, which helps maintain a normotensive state in these animals [82]. RHuEpo has vasoconstrictor effects on isolated renal and mesenteric resistance vessels [83] and high concentrations have been shown to induce contractions of rat mesangial and aortic smooth muscle cells [84]. In cell culture, rHuEpo raises the cytosolic calcium content of VSMC, with stimulation of PKC and PLC-g1 [75,85] likely contributing to this process [86]. Epo has a synergistic effect on rises in Ca 21 concentration in response to norepinephrine [86,87], angiotensin II [85] and ET-1 [88]. RhuEpo increases the mRNA and protein expression of angiotensin receptors types 1 and 2 (Table 1). The increase in Ang II receptors sensitizes the cells to Ang II [89]. Epo inhibits IL-1b stimulated NO production in rat VSMC [86,90], potentially contributing to increased vasomotor tone. The increase of angiotensin II receptor on VSMC by Epo not only affects vasomotor tone but also increases gene products that could enhance cell proliferation (TGFb, IGF-II, EGF, PDGF, c-fos) [89]. Induction of the expression of the proto-oncogenes c-myc, JunB, as well as transient induction of c-fos has been reported [91], likely contributing to the dose-dependent mitogenic effects of Epo on SMC, as indicated by 3 H-thymidine incorporation [91,92]. The mitogenic effects may be more pronounced when VSMC from SHR were used compared with WKY (Wistar–Kyoto) rats [93], suggesting that hypertension may ‘prime’ VSMC for a proliferative response to Epo. Furthermore, Epo induces Akt phosphorylation through the 8. Hypertension Hypertension develops or worsens in 20–30% of renal patients treated with rHuEpo [98]. Although the elevated blood pressure can usually be treated without serious consequences, hypertensive encephalopathy and seizures occur rarely [99]. Increased blood pressure may occur in dialysis patients as early as 2 weeks or up to 4 months after the onset of therapy [98], most commonly in patients receiving dialysis, who have a history of hypertension [98]. Animal models have mimicked the clinical scenario with a rise in blood pressure after rHuEpo most likely to occur in uremic animals with a predisposition to hypertension [100]. Patients who are hypotensive may have a 10% increase in BP after starting erythropoietin [98]. Postulated mechanisms for erythropoietin-induced hypertension include increased viscosity, enhanced vascular reactivity due to the correction of hypoxia or vasoconstrictive responses due to the correction of anemia. Some evidence suggests that rHuEpo may lead to catecholamine release and activation of the renin–angiotensin system. Cirillo et al. reported a significant association between hematocrit and prevalence of hypertension [101], while other studies have not demonstrated this correlation [102]. RHuEpo may have a direct vasopressor effect due to SMC contraction at the level of the small resistance vasculature [83]. The vasopressor effect may be due in part to the rise in intracellular calcium levels, although in an animal model, Roger et al. reported an increase in BP in uremic SHR without an increase in cytosolic calcium levels [100]. Epo stimulates increased ET-1 release in cultured endothelial cells [72], in isolated hind legs of rats [103] and in mice that overexpress erythropoietin [104]. ET-1 levels have been reported to be elevated in some [105] but not all [106] studies in patients receiving rHuEpo. 9. Effects of erythropoietin on the heart RHuEpo produces a dose-dependent increase in neonatal rat cardiomyocyte proliferation, which was inhibited by tyrosine kinase, protein kinase C and phospholipase C inhibitors [108]. Furthermore, ouabain, an inhibitor of Na 1 ,K 1 -ATPase activity, inhibited the stimulation of proliferation by rHuEpo [107] (Table 1). The effects of rHuEpo on the myocyte cells appear to be related to the Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 7. Erythropoietin effects on vascular smooth muscle cells PI3 kinase pathway in rat aortic VSMC [94] and phosphoAkT mediates an anti-apoptotic effect [95]. There is a significant elevation in the expression of EpoR in the hyperplastic intima from stenotic fistula in hemodialysis patients receiving erythropoietin therapy [96]. Based on these effects it is possible that Epo administration contributes to the accelerated progression of atherosclerosis in dialysis patients [97]. Treatment Treatment duration Outcome Ref. ESRD Population Mean Hct 2563% (n518) Mean Hct 22.562% (n513) Epo (50 U/kg) s.c. 33 per week to keep Hct 30–40% Epo (40–120 IU/kg) 33 per week to keep Hct 30–35% ↑ SV, ↑ CI, ↑ MAP ↓LVEDD & LVESD, ↓LVEDV & LVESV, ↓ SV & CO, ↑EF (8/13 patients) [115] [117] Mean Hct 23.762.5% (n525) Mean Hct 22.964.3% (n515) Epo (40–120 IU/kg) to goal Hct of 30–35% Epo 33 per week i.v. to goal Hct of 35–38% 20 weeks 5–21 weeks (mean 12 weeks) $4 months 2867 weeks ↓ LVEDD & LVESD ↓ LVEDV & LVESV, ↑ EF & FS, ↓ SV & CO ↓ EDD & ESD ↓LV mass, ↑ EF [118] [119] 7.265.5 months ↓NYHA Class 3.66→2.66; LVEF 28→35%; hospitalizations ↓ [120] 8.262.7 months Treatment group: NYHA class improved by 42.1%; LVEF ↑ 5.5%; diuretics ↓ 51.3%; hospitalizations ↓ 79.0% Increased Hb, peak VO 2 , and exercise duration in Epo-treated patients; decreased exercise duration in control group [124] CHF Population .Class III; Hb,12; EF,35 (n526) Class III–IV, EF,40; Hb,11.5 (n532) Class III–IV; HCT,35% (n526) Nonrandomized; Epo, s.c. 2000 IU/week1200 mg i.v. Fe until Hb.12 Randomized; Epo 4000 IU/week s.c.1200 mg i.v. Fe until Hb.12.5 vs. placebo Randomized; EPO 15–30 000 IU/week s.c. vs. placebo 3 months Clinical trials of Epo in anemic patients with CHF and ESRD are shown. [125] K. J. Smith et al. / Cardiovascular Research 59 (2003) 538–548 Table 2 Cardiovascular effects of erythropoietin: clinical trials 543 Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 544 K. J. Smith et al. / Cardiovascular Research 59 (2003) 538–548 with intravenous iron to patients with CHF improved NYHA functional class, EF, the number of hospitalized days, the dose of diuretics and slowed the rate of progression of renal failure [120]. Similar findings were seen in 32 patients with anemia and CHF randomized to erythropoietin versus standard therapy [124]. Mancini et al. performed a single blind randomized trial of Epo versus placebo in patients with class III or IV CHF and HCT ,35% [125]. After 3 months of therapy, there was a significant increase in peak VO 2 of 1.7 ml / kg / min in the rHuEpo treated group compared with a decline of 0.5 ml / kg / min in the placebo cohort. The rHuEpo group also had an increased exercise duration and distance time of 6 min and an improved quality of life score [125]. Epo therapy was well tolerated without thrombotic complications or hypertension [125]. 10. Future studies of erythropoietin therapy The Cardiovascular Risk Reduction by Early Anemia Treatment with Epoetin beta (CREATE) trial will investigate the effect of early anemia correction on cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with renal impairment not yet on renal replacement therapy [126]. The primary outcomes will be the change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) assessed by echocardiography at 1 year and the time to first cardiovascular events. There will be two arms in the study: in the early intervention group, anemia correction will begin with a Hb of 11–12.5 g / dl, with a target of 13–15 g / dl. In the late treatment arm, rHuEpo will be administered for a Hb of ,10.5 g / dl with a target of 10.5–11.5 g / dl [126]. Erythropoietin may have additional benefits on the heart that could further expand its cardiovascular applications. RHuEpo has a demonstrated benefit as a neuroprotective agent through its anti-apoptotic, neurotrophic, antioxidant and angiogenic effects [127]. RHuEpo also protects against ischemic cell death by inhibiting the release of glutamate, a well-known neurotoxin, from neurons and attenuating glutamate toxicity [39,128]. RhuEpo preserves mitochondrial function in the skeletal muscle of patients with renal failure [129] and in anoxic endothelial cells in culture [130]. Therefore clinical studies may be warranted to determine if rHuEpo affords cardiac protection in clinical scenarios such as ischemic reperfusion injury. 11. Conclusions The use of erythropoietin has resulted in profound improvements in the health and quality of life of dialysis patients and has been a landmark achievement in the care of end-stage renal disease patients. Although classically described as a hormone that stimulates erythroid precursors, erythropoietin is now known to have effects on many cells and tissues. Erythropoietin stimulates endo- Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 capacity of erythropoietin to stimulate Na 1 ,K 1 -ATPase activity, likely secondary to the activation of tyrosine kinase and protein kinase C. In the myocardium from uremic rats, there is a decrease in high affinity binding sites for [ 3 H]ouabain which is restored by erythropoietin treatment. This finding suggests a mechanism for improved myocardial contractility in renal failure patients after rHuEpo administration [108]. Patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease have elevated Epo levels, which can induce erythrocytosis, with subsequent hyperviscosity, exacerbation of heart failure, as well as seizures and thromboembolic events. Mice overexpressing the human Epo gene develop severe erythrocytosis (HCT50.80), resulting in decreased survival, increased heart weights, and biventricular dilatation [109]. In contrast, mice lacking erythropoietin or erythropoietin receptor die at embryonic days 13–15 and have reduced number of proliferating cardiac myocytes, resulting in ventricular hypoplasia [40]. This defect is probably due to the severe anemia in these mice rather than a specific dependence on the Epo–EpoR signaling pathway in normal heart development [110]. Suzuki et al. rescued EpoRnull mice from embryonic lethality by expressing an EpoR transgene under the control of a GATA-locus hematopoietic regulatory domain. These mice expressed EpoR exclusively in the hematopoietic lineage, and displayed normal blood vessel formation and cardiac development [110]. In dialysis patients, lower hemoglobin levels are associated with increased frequency of LVH, possibly through renin–angiotensin system activation [111–113]. There is a 30% increased risk of developing LV mass for each 0.5 g / dl drop in hemoglobin [111]. Chronic anemia increases the work load on the heart and increased LV mass is observed in anemic patients with both ESRD and normal renal function. Partial correction of the anemia of renal failure by rHuEpo ameliorates LVH [114]. In ESRD patients, the effect of rHuEpo on LVH may be dependent upon the degree of anemia prior to initiation of rHuEpo therapy [114]. In anemic patients with renal insufficiency, rHuEpo therapy enhances cardiac output [115], reduces sympathetic tone, increases peripheral vascular resistance, improves coronary circulation and exercise tolerance [116], induces regression of LVH [116–119] and increases LVEF in patients with LV dysfunction [117–120] (Table 2). More than 79% of patients with class IV CHF have a Hb,12 g / dl, even if the degree of renal impairment is only mild [120]. Hemodilution accounts for nearly half of all cases of apparent anemia [121]. Several studies have demonstrated that the presence of anemia is associated with increased mortality in patients with CHF [121–123] with an excess of approximately 13% for each 1 g / dl decrease in the hemoglobin [122]. Importantly, the decreased survival was noted at relatively mild anemia (,11.6 g / dl in women and ,12.6 g / dl in men) [122]. In an open label study, rHuEpo administration along K. J. Smith et al. / Cardiovascular Research 59 (2003) 538–548 thelial cells with potential benefits (proliferation, angiogenesis) as well as potential detriments (PAI-1 and endothelin production). Erythropoietin can activate platelets, an effect that could enhance thrombosis risks when this therapy is used in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Nevertheless, early studies have demonstrated the benefits and safety of rHuEpo therapy for patients with CHF and anemia. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and to examine the effect of recombinant human erythropoietin and NESP in other cardiovascular settings. References [18] Marti HH, Wenger RH, Rivas LA et al. Erythropoietin gene expression in human, monkey and murine brain. Eur J Neurosci 1996;8:666–676. [19] Abramowicz M. Darbepoetin (Aranesp)—A long-acting erythropoietin. Med Lett 2001;43:109–110. [20] Casadevall N, Nataf J, Viron B et al. Pure red-cell aplasia and antierythropoietin antibodies in patients treated with recombinant erythropoietin. N Engl J Med 2002;346:469–475. [21] Bazan JF. Structural design and molecular evolution of a cytokine receptor superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:6934–6938. [22] Witthuhn A, Quelle FW, Silvennoinen O et al. JAK2 associates with the erythropoietin receptor and is tyrosine phosphorylated and activated following stimulation with erythropoietin. Cell 1993;74:227–236. [23] Gouilleux F, Pallard C, Dusanter-Fourt I et al. Prolactin, growth hormone, erythropoietin and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor induce MGF-Stat5 DNA binding activity. EMBO J 1995;14:2005–2013. [24] Bao H, Jacobs-Helber SM, Lawson AE, Penta K, Wickrema A, Sawyer ST. Protein kinase B (c-Akt), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and STAT5 are activated by erythropoietin (EPO) in HCD57 erythroid cells but are constitutively active in an EPO-independent, apoptosis-resistant subclone (HCD57-SREI cells). Blood 1999;93:3757–3773. [25] Cheung JY, Miller BA. Molecular mechanisms of erythropoietin signaling. Nephron 2001;87:215–222. [26] Digicaylioglu M, Lipton SA. Erythropoietin-mediated neuroprotection involves cross-talk between Jak2 and NF-KB signalling cascades. Nature 2001;412:641–647. [27] Ammarguellat F, Llovera M, Kelly PA, Goffin V. Low doses of EPO activate MAP kinases but not JAK2-STAT5 in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophy Res Commun 2001;284:1031–1038. [28] Marrero MB, Venema RC, Ma H, Ling BN, Eaton DC. Erythropoietin receptor-operated Ca 21 channels: Activation by phospholipase C-g1. Kidney Int 1998;53:1259–1268. [29] Miller BA, Cheung JY. Mechanisms of erythropoietin signal transduction: involvement of calcium channels. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1994;206:263–267. [30] Fraser JK, Lin FK, Berridge MV. Expression of high affinity receptors for erythropoietin on human bone marrow cells and on the human erythroleukemic cell line, HEL. Exp Hematol 1988;16:836– 842. [31] Fraser JK, Tan AS, Lin F-K, Berridge MV. Expression of specific high-affinity binding sites for erythropoietin on rat and mouse megakaryocytes. Exp Hematol 1989;17:10–16. [32] Anagnostou A, Liu Z, Steiner M et al. Erythropoietin receptor mRNA expression in human endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:3974–3978. [33] Nagai T, Akizawa T, Kohjiro S et al. rHuEPO enhances the production of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in cultured endothelial cells. Kidney Int 1996;50:102–107. [34] Anagnostou A, Lee ES, Kessimian N, Levinson R, Steiner M. Erythropoietin has a mitogenic and positive chemotactic effect on endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:5978–5982. [35] Ogilvie M, Yu X, Nicolas-Metral V et al. Erythropoietin stimulates proliferation and interferes with differentiation of myoblasts. J Biol Chem 2000;275:39754–39761. [36] Masuda S, Nagao M, Takahata K et al. Functional erythropoietin receptor of the cells with neural characteristics. Comparison with receptor properties of erythroid cells. J Biol Chem 1993;268:11208– 11216. [37] Westenfelder C, Biddle DL, Baranowski RL. Human, rat, and mouse kidney cells express functional erythropoietin receptors. Kidney Int 1999;55:808–820. [38] Arcasoy MO, Amin K, Karayal AF et al. Functional significance of erythropoietin receptor expression in breast cancer. Lab Invest 2002;82:911–918. Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 ´ ´ [1] Moreno F, Sanz-Guajardo D, Lopez-Gomez JM, Jofre R, Val´ derrabano F. Increasing the hematocrit has a beneficial effect on quality of life and is safe in selected hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:335–342. [2] Eknoyan G, Levin N. Clinical practice guidelines: final guideline summaries from the work groups of the national kidney foundationdialysis outcomes quality initiative. New York: National Kidney Foundation; 1997. [3] Beguin Y. A risk-benefit assessment of epoetin in the management of anaemia associated with cancer. Drug Safety 1998;19:269–282. [4] Adamson JW, Schuster M, Allen S, Haley NR. Effectiveness of recombinant human erythropoietin therapy in myelodysplastic syndromes. Acta Haematol 1992;87(supp1 1):20–24. [5] Phibbs RH, Shannon KM, Mentzer WC. Potential for treatment of anaemia of prematurity with recombinant human erythropoietin: preliminary results. Acta Haematol 1992;87(suppl 1):28–33. [6] Feagan BG, Wong CJ, Kirkley A et al. Erythropoietin with iron supplementation to prevent allogeneic blood transfusion in total hip joint arthroplasty. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:845–854. [7] Corwin HL, Gettingrer A, Pearl RG et al. Efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in critically ill patients. J Am Med Assoc 2002;288:2827–2835. [8] Cotter DJ, Thamer M, Kimmel PL, Sadler JH. Secular trends in recombinant erythropoietin therapy among the U.S. hemodialysis population: 1990–1996. Kidney Int 1998;54:2129–2139. [9] Macdougall IC. Novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein. Semin Nephrol 2000;20:375–381. [10] Noris M, Remuzzi G. Uremic bleeding: closing the circle after 30 years of controversies? Blood 1999;94:2569–2574. [11] Ozaki K, Leonard WJ. Cytokine and cytokine receptor pleiotropy and redundancy. J Biol Chem 2002;277:29355–29358. [12] Gabrilove J. Overview: erythropoiesis, anemia, and the impact of erythropoietin. Semin Hematol 2000;37(Suppl 6):1–3. [13] Koury ST, Bondurant MC, Koury MJ. Localization of erythropoietin synthesizing cells in murine kidneys by in situ hybridization. Blood 1988;71:524–527. [14] Dame C, Fahnenstich H, Freitag P, Hofmann D, Abdul-Nour T, Bartmann P, Fandrey J. Erythropoietin mRNA in human fetal and neonatal tissue. Blood 1998;92:3218–3225. [15] Vogt C, Pentz S, Rich IN. A role for the macrophage in normal hemopoiesis: III. In vitro and in vivo erythropoietin gene expression in macrophages detected by in situ hybridization. Exp Hematol 1989;17:391–397. [16] Conrad KP, Benyo DF, Westerhausen-Larsen A, Miles TM. Expression of erythropoietin by the human placenta. FASEB J 1996;10:760–768. [17] Juul SE, Zhao Y, Dame JB, Du Y, Hutson AD, Christensen RD. Origin and fate of erythropoietin in human milk. Pediatr Res 2000;48:660–667. 545 546 K. J. Smith et al. / Cardiovascular Research 59 (2003) 538–548 [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] Low-dose aspirin does not prevent thrombovascular accidents in low-risk haemodialysis patients during treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1994;9:1115–1120. Taylor JE, Henderson IS, Stewart WK, Belch JJ. Erythropoietin and spontaneous platelet aggregation in haemodialysis patients. Lancet 1991;338:1361–1362. Zhou XJ, Vaziri ND. Defective calcium signaling in uraemic platelets and its amelioration with long-term erythropoietin therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17:992–997. Diaz-Ricart M, Estebanell E, Cases A et al. Erythropoietin improves signaling through tyrosine phosphorylation in platelets from uremic patients. Thromb Haemost 1999;82:1312–1317. Roger SD, Piper J, Tucker B, Raine AE, Baker LR, Kovacs IB. Enhanced platelet reactivity with erythropoietin but not following transfusion in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplan 1993;8:213– 217. Ando M, Iwata A, Ozeki Y, Tsuchiya K, Akiba T, Nihei H. Circulating platelet-derived microparticles with procoagulant activity may be a potential cause of thrombosis in uremic patients. Kidney Int 2002;62:1757–1764. Stohlawetz PJ, Dzirio L, Hergovich N et al. Effects of erythropoietin on platelet reactivity and thrombopoiesis in humans. Blood 2000;95:2983–2989. Pirisi M, Fabris C, Soardo G, Cecchin E, Toniutto P, Bartoli E. Thrombocytopenia of chronic liver disease corrected by erythropoietin treatment. J Hepatol 1994;21:376–380. Karnicki K, Owen WG, Miller RS, McBand RDII. Factors contributing to individual propensity for arterial thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002;22:1495–1499. Sharpe PC, Desai ZR, Morris TCM. Increase in mean platelet volume in patients with chronic renal failure treated with erythropoietin. J Clin Pathol 1994;47:159–161. Martin JF, Bath PMW, Burr ML. Influence of platelet size on outcome after myocardial infarction. Lancet 1991;338:1409–1411. Ribatti D, Presta M, Vacca A et al. Human erythropoietin induces a pro-angiogenic phenotype in cultured endothelial cells and stimulates neovascularization in vivo. Blood 1999;93:2627–2636. Carlini RG, Dusso AS, Obialo CI, Alvarez UM, Rothstein M. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) increases endothelin1 release by endothelial cells. Kidney Int 1993;43:1010–1014. Yasuda Y, Masuda S, Chikuma M, Inoue K, Nagao M, Sasaki R. Estrogen-dependent production of erythropoietin in uterus and its implication in uterine angiogenesis. J Biol Chem 1998;273:25381– 25387. Jaquet K, Krause K, Tawakol-Khodai M, Geidel S, Kuck K-H. Erythropoietin and VEGF exhibit equal angiogenic potential. Microvascular Res 2002;64:326–333. Carlini RG, Gupta A, Liapis H, Rothstein M. Endothelin-1 release by erythropoietin involves calcium signaling in endothelial cells. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995;26:889–892. Haller H, Christel C, Dannenberg L, Thiele P, Lindschau C, Luft FC. Signal transduction of erythropoietin in endothelial cells. Kidney Int 1996;50:481–488. Fodinger M, Fritsche-Polanz R, Buchmayer H et al. Erythropoietininducible immediate-early genes in human vascular endothelial cells. J Invest Med 2000;48:137–149. ¨ WH. Novel aspects of erythropoietin Sunder-Plassmann G, Horl response in renal failure patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001;16(suppl 5):40–44. Noguchi K, Yamashiro S, Matsuzaki T et al. Effect of 1-week treatment with erythropoietin on the vascular endothelial function in anaesthetized rabbits. Br J Pharmacol 2001;133:395–405. Wang XQ, Vaziri ND. Erythropoietin depresses nitric oxide synthase expression by human endothelial cells. Hypertension 1999;33:894– 899. Shibata J, Hasegawa J, Siemens H-J, et al. Hemostasis and coagulation at a hematocrit of 0.85: functional consequences of erythro- Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 [39] Junk AK, Mammis A, Savitz SI et al. Erythropoietin administration protects retinal neurons from acute ischemia-reperfusion injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:10659–10664. [40] Wu H, Lee SH, Gao J, Liu X, Iruela-Arispe ML. Inactivation of erythropoietin leads to defects in cardiac morphogenesis. Development 1999;126:3597–3605. [41] Baynes RD, Reddy GK, Shih YJ, Skikne BS, Cook JD. Serum form of the erythropoietin receptor identified by a sequence-specific peptide antibody. Blood 1993;82:2088–2095. [42] Harris KW, Winkelmann JC. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects a potential soluble form of the erythropoietin receptor in human plasma. Am J Hematol 1996;52:8–13. [43] Maeda Y, Sakaguchi M, Naiki Y et al. Possible involvement of soluble erythropoietin receptor in resistance to erythropoietin in patients with renal anemia. Am J Nephrol 2001;21:426. [44] Shimizu R, Komatsu N, Miura Y. Dominant negative effect of a truncated erythropoietin receptor (EPOR-T) on erythropoietin-induced erythroid differentiation: possible involvement of EPOR-T in ineffective erythropoiesis of myeloblastic syndrome. Exp Hematol 1999;27:229–233. [45] Besarab A, Bolton WK, Browne JK et al. The effects of normal as compared with low hematocrit values in patients with cardiac disease who are receiving hemodialysis and epoetin. N Engl J Med 1998;339:584–590. [46] Muirhead N, Laupacis A, Wong C. Erythropoietin for anemia in haemodialysis patients: results of a maintenance study (the Canadian Erythropoietin Study Group). Nephrol Dial Transplant 1992;7:811– 816. [47] Viron B, Chamma F, Jaar B, Michel C, Mignon F. Thrombosis of angioaccess in haemodialysed patients treated with human recombinant erythropoietin. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997;12:368–370. [48] Aranesp姠 (darbepoetin alfa), package insert, Amgen. [49] Wolf RF, Gilmore LS, Friese P, Downs T, Burstein SA, Dale GL. Erythropoietin potentiates thrombus development in a canine arteriovenous shunt model. Thromb Haemost 1997;77:1020–1024. [50] Tang WW, Stead RA, Goodkin DA. Effects of epoetin alfa on hemostasis in chronic renal failure. Am J Nephrol 1998;18:263–273. [51] Lage JMM, Panizo C, Masdeu J, Rocha E. Cyclist’s doping associated with cerebral sinus thrombosis. Neurology 2002;58:665. [52] Begg TB, Hearns JB. Components in blood viscosity. The relative contribution of haematocrit, plasma fibrinogen and other proteins. Clin Sci 1966;31:87–93. [53] Turitto VT, Weiss HJ. Red blood cells: their dual role in thrombus formation. Science 1980;207:541–543. [54] Malyszko J, Malyszko JS, Borawski J et al. A study of platelet functions, some hemostatic and fibrinolytic parameters in relation to serotonin in hemodialyzed patients under erythropoietin therapy. Thromb Res 1995;77:133–143. [55] Akizawa T, Kinugasa E, Kitaoka T, Koshikawa S. Effects of recombinant human erythropoietin and correction of anemia on platelet function in hemodialysis patients. Nephron 1991;58:400– 406. [56] Taylor JE, McLaren M, Henderson IS, Belch JJF, Stewart WK. Prothrombotic effect of erythropoietin in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1992;7:235–239. [57] Macdougall IC, Davies ME, Hallett I et al. Coagulation in studies and fistula blood flow during erythropoietin therapy in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1991;6:862–867. [58] Christensson AG, Danielson BG, Lethagen SR. Normalization of haemoglobin concentration with recombinant erythropoietin has minimal effect on blood haemostasis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001;16:313–319. [59] Marchi SD, Cecchin E, Falleti E et al. Long-term effects of erythropoietin therapy on fistula stenosis and plasma concentrations of PDGF and MCP-1 in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997;8:1147–1156. [60] Kooistra MP, van Es A, Marx JJM, Hertsig MLA, Struyvenberg A. K. J. Smith et al. / Cardiovascular Research 59 (2003) 538–548 [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] zation of hematocrit in hemodialysis patients with cardiac disease does not increase blood pressure. Renal Failure 2000;22(4):435– 444. Katoh K, Mizuno K, Hashimoto S et al. Direct evidence for erythropoietin-induced release of endothelin from peripheral vascular tissue. Life Sci 1994;54:PL253–259. Quaschning T, Ruschizka F, Stallmach T et al. Eryhropoietininduced excessive erythrocytosis activates the tissue endothelin system in mice. FASEB J 2003;17:259–261. Carlini R, Obialo CI, Rothstein M. Intravenous erythropoietin (rHuEPO) administration increases plasma endothelin and blood pressure in hemodialysis patients. Am J Hypertens 1993;6:103– 107. Brunet P, Lorec AM, Leonetti F et al. Plasma endothelin in haemodialysis patients treated with recombinant human erythropoietin. Nephrol Dial Transpl 1994;9:650–654. Wald MR, Borda ES, Sterin-Borda L. Mitogenic effect of erythropoietin on neonatal rat cardiomyocytes: Signal transduction pathways. J Cell Physiol 1996;167:461–468. Wald M, Gutnisky A, Borda E, Sterin-Borda L. Erythropoietin modified the cardiac action of ouabain in chronically anaemicuraemic rats. Nephron 1995;71:190–196. Wagner KF, Katschinski DM, Hasegawa J et al. Chronic inborn erythrocytosis leads to cardiac dysfunction and premature death in mice overexpressing erythropoietin. Blood 2001;97:536–542. Suzuki N, Ohneda O, Takahashi S et al. Erythroid-specific expression of the erythropoietin receptor rescued its null mutant mice from lethality. Blood 2002;100:2279–2288. Levin A, Thompson C, Ethier J et al. Left ventricle mass index increase in early renal disease: Impact of decline in hemoglobin. Am J Kidney Dis 1999;34:125–134. Greaves SC, Gamble GD, Collins JF, Whalley GA, Sharpe DN. Determinants of left ventricle hypertrophy and systolic dysfunction in chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 1994;24:768–776. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Harnett JD, Kent GM, Murray DC, Barre PE. The prognostic importance of left ventricular geometry in uremic cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995;5:2024–2031. ¨ WH. Effect of Erythropoietin on Sunder-Plassmann G, Horl Cardiovascular Diseases. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;38(4):S20–S25. Linde T, Wikstrom B, Andersson LG, Danielson BG. Renal anaemia treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin increases cardiac output in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1996;30:115–120. Katona M. In: Erythropoiesis: new dimensions in the treatment of anemia, vol. 3; 1991, pp. 39–45. Low I, Grutzmacher P, Bergmann M, Schoeppe W. Echocardiographic findings in patients on maintenance hemodialysis substituted with recombinant human erythropoietin. Clin Nephrol 1989;31:26– 30. Low-Friedrich I, Grutzmacher P, Marz W, Bergmann M, Schoeppe W. Therapy with recombinant human erythropoietin reduces cardiac size and improves heart function in chronic hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol 1991;11:54–60. Goldberg N, Lundin AP, Delano B, Friedman EA, Stein RA. Changes in left ventricular size, wall thickness, and function in anemic patients treated with recombinant human erythropoietin. Am Heart J 1992;124:424–427. Silverberg DS, Wexler D, Blum M et al. The use of subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron for the treatment of the anemia of severe, resistant congestive heart failure improves cardiac and renal function and functional cardiac class, and markedly reduces hospitalizations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1737–1744. Androne A-S, Katz SD, Lund L, LaManca J, Hudaihed A, Hryniewicz K, Mancini DM. Hemodilution is common in patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation 2003;107:226–229. Horwich TB, Fonarow GC, Hamilton MA, MacLellan WR, Borenstein J. Anemia is associated with worse symptoms, greater Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 cytosis. Blood First Edition Paper, prepublished online February 6, 2003. [82] Wilcox CS, Deng X, Doll AH, Snellen H, Welch WJ. Nitric oxide mediates renal vasodilation during erythropoietin-induced polycythemia. Kidney Int 1993;44:430–435. [83] Heidenreich S, Rahn KH, Zidek W. Direct vasopressor effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on renal resistance vessels. Kidney Int 1991;39:259–265. [84] Morakkabati N, Gollnick F, Meyer R, Fandrey J, Jelkmann W. Erythropoietin induces Ca21 mobilization and contraction in rat mesangial and aortic smooth muscle cultures. Exp Hematol 1996;24:392–397. [85] Akimoto T, Kusano E, Fujita N et al. Erythropoietin modulates 21 angiotensin II- or noradrenaline-induced Ca mobilization in cultured rat vascular smooth-muscle cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001;16:491–499. [86] Akimoto T, Kusano E, Muto S et al. The effect of erythropoietin on interleukin-1b mediated increase in nitric oxide synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Hypertens 1999;17:1249–1256. [87] Hand MF, Haynes WG, Johnstone HA, Anderton JL, Webb DJ. Erythropoietin enhances vascular responsiveness to norepinephrine in renal failure. Kidney Int 1995;48:806–813. [88] Kusano E, Akimoto T, Umino T et al. Modulation of endothelin-1induced cytosolic free calcium mobilization and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by erythropoietin in vascular smooth muscle cells. Kidney Blood Press Res 2001;24:192–200. [89] Barrett JD, Zhang Z, Zhu JH et al. Erythropoietin upregulates angiotensin receptors in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells. J Hypertens 1998;16:1749–1757. [90] Kusano E, Akimoto T, Inoue M et al. Human recombinant erythropoietin inhibits interleukin-1b-stimulated nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate production in cultured rat vascular smooth-muscle cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:597–603. [91] Goguzev J, Zhu DL, Herembert T, Ammarguellat F, Marche P, Drueke T. Effect of erythropoietin on DNA synthesis, proto-oncogene expression and phospholipase C activity in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1994;199:977–983. [92] Carlini RG, Reyes AA, Rothstein M. Recombinant human erythropoietin stimulates angiogenesis in vitro. Kidney Int 1995;47:740– 745. [93] Ammarguellat F, Goguzev J, Drueke TB. Direct effect of erythropoietin on rat vascular smooth-muscle cell via putative erythropoietin receptor. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11:687–692. [94] Akimoto T, Kusano E, Inaba T et al. Erythropoietin regulates vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis by a phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase-dependent pathway. Kidney Int 2000;58:269–282. [95] Shiojima I, Walsh K. Role of AKT signaling in vascular homeostasis and angiogenesis. Circ Res 2002;90:1243–1250. [96] Ikegaya N, Yamamoto T, Takeshita A et al. Elevated erythropoietin receptor and transforming growth factor-b1 expression in stenotic arteriovenous fistulae used for hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:928–935. [97] Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1998;32(Suppl):S112–S119. [98] Maschio G. Erythropoietin and systemic hypertension. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995;10(suppl 2):74–79. [99] Bleyer AJ, Burkart JM. Seizures: II. Semin Dialysis 1994;7:41–45. [99] Roger RD, Fluck RJ, McMahon AC, Raine AEG. Recombinant erythropoietin increases blood pressure in experimental hypertension and uraemia without change in vascular cytosolic calcium. Nephron 1996;73:212–218. [101] Cirillo M, Laurenzi M, Trevisan M, Stamler J. Hematocrit, Blood Pressure, and Hypertension: The Gubbio Population Study. Hypertension 1992;20:319–326. [102] Conlon PJ, Kovalik E, Schumm D, Minda S, Schwab SJ. Normali- 547 548 K. J. Smith et al. / Cardiovascular Research 59 (2003) 538–548 impairment in functional capacity and a significant increase in mortality in patients with advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1780–1786. [123] Ezekowitz JA, McAlister FA, Armstrong PW. Anemia is common in heart failure and is associated with poor outcomes. Insights from a cohort of 12065 patients with new-onset heart failure. Circulation 2003;107:223–225. [124] Silverberg DS, Wexler D, Sheps D et al. The effect of correction of mild anemia in severe, resistant congestive heart failure using subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron: a randomized controlled study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1775–1780. [125] Mancini DM, Katz SD, Lang CC, LaManca J, Hudaihed A, Androne A-S. Effect of erythropoietin on exercise capacity in patients with moderate to severe chronic heart failure. Circulation 2003;107:294–299. [126] Eckardt K-U. The CREATE trial—building the evidence. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001;16(suppl 2):16–18. [127] Siren AL, Ehrenreich H. Erythropoietin—a novel concept for neuroprotection. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001;251:179–184. [128] Kawakami M, Sekiguchi M, Sato K, Kozaki S, Takahashi M. Erythropoietin receptor-mediated inhibition of exocytotic glutamate release confers neuroprotection during chemical ischemia. J Biol Chem 2001;276:39469–39475. [129] Miro´ O, Marrades RM, Roca J et al. Skeletal muscle mitochondrial function is preserved in young patients with chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39:1025–1031. [130] Chong ZZ, Kang J-Q, Maiese K. Erythropoietin is a novel vascular protectant through activation of Akt1 and mitochondrial modulation of cystein proteases. Circulation 2002;106:2973–2979. Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014
© Copyright 2024