Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 FROM THE DESK OF THE CHAIRMAN E lections to the Haryana and Maharashtra Assemblies are over and both states have new Chief Ministers of BJP for the first time. In both the states the elections were won single headedly by Narendra Modi. The election to the Maharashtra Assembly was a defining one for the state for more reasons than one. All the parties forming part of one coalition or the other have been cut to size. Even the BJP to some extent. BJP expected to be within a striking distance of an absolute majority mark, if not a simple majority when they somehow or other managed to break its alliance with Shiv Sena before the Polls. That was not to be. It needs some party or other to support it now. Shiv Sena was firmly under the impression that the BJP was riding piggy back on them all these years. That was proved wrong when the results were out. The Congress expecting a rout was only hoping for at least one seat more than its erstwhile ally the NCP by projecting that it was the natural party of governance and NCP a natural party of corruption. NCP believed genuinely that it could swing the electorate and get an impressive number of sets if it could get rid of the baggage called the Congress. With no ideology of its own other than wanting to be part of a ruling dispensation, the party has been brought down to earth by the electorate. Even before the results were out it went to town to declare its unilateral support to the BJP in the name of stability and in the interest of the state! If this logic of stability is to be taken to its logical conclusion there should be no space or role for an opposition party in any legislative set up. So eager was NCP to support BJP it looked as if it was rushing to apply for anticipatory bail. The reasons appear obvious. In this milieu everyone was looking for the person who first announced his own candidature for the post of Chief Minister of the state even before the Elections Commission formally announced the election schedule - Raj Thackeray. The real test for BJP starts now. If they, on the basis of the 'unconditional' support extended by the NCP, continue to rule, the obvious inference would be that nothing has changed in Indian politics. The day of reckoning is here and now for the Grand Old Party for yet another reason. Sardar Patel is known as the iron man of India for good reason. The iron man is now stealing the show for the BJP right from under the nose of the Congress to which he belonged when he was alive. BJP is pitching the legacy of Patel against that of Nehru. Congress, the party, cannot object to any glorification of Sardar Patel. But at the same time the sycophants who make up the party cannot accept it for their own survival. In fact Nehru and Gandhi (the new variety) are existential issues for the party. The BJP is relishing the plight of the GOP. The Congress needs to reinvent itself. It cannot do so in a vacuum. The vacuum starts at the very top of the party. A revolt or mutiny now appears inevitable within the party. There is no one anywhere at the top who remotely show the guts and gumption of an Indira Gandhi when she was thrown out of power after Emergency. No one gave her even an outside chance to bounce back. Bounce back she did and how. In August 1977 less than six months after she was voted out of power Indira Gandhi visited Belchhi in Bihar atop an elephant to see first-hand the after effects of caste carnage - an image that transfixed the nation long before television sets came to our drawing rooms. Guts she had and gumption she had plenty. After all, a surname can take you only so far. While talking about the first family it is difficult to resist the temptation of talking about the sons in law of the family. Feroze Gandhi the son in law of the first PM of the country had problems with his father in law and he was considered a renegade by Nehru. History is repeating itself now with the current son in law of the family getting into all kinds of problems and dominating the news for all the wrong reasons. It is anybody's 1 Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 guess whether the family considers him a renegade. Whether the first family considers him an embarrassment or not, he is indeed an embarrassment to the Indian polity. that a voluntary option of this nature help further the career of a female employee. There is yet another dimension that the success rate of such experiments has been only 30% so far. The advantage that accrues to the employer is clear. They get to retain trained talent at her prime. The perceived advantage for the employee concerned is that she can decide to have a baby a little later in her career so that she does not miss out on her opportunities in the rat race in the corporate world. This latter argument looks a bit facetious to me. More you climb the ladder in the corporate world the less will be your inclination to take a break for fear of losing all that you have built up by dint of your hard work in the past. Issues associated with work-life balance of a female employee after having her child seems now to have been advanced. The issue for her now is to whether to face the challenge or to freeze the eggs. People generally assume that countries in the entire African continent are backward and we are perhaps better off than them. It may be only partially true. One important and fundamental yardstick people normally deploy to measure the progress of a society is the existence of rule of law. In turn, the rule of law is normally assessed by the effectiveness of judicial processes and the justice delivery mechanism dispensed through courts of law. The world got an opportunity to see how effectively the courts function in South Africa during the trial of Paralympian Oscar Pistorius, famously called the 'blade runner' as he runs with two artificial legs. Pistorius was being tried for murdering his girlfriend in cold blood. The trial was as sensational as the murder itself. Pistorius was found guilty of culpable homicide and sentenced to five years in prison. That is only part of the story. What was on display during the trial was the South African judicial process and, believe me, it was fascinating. A puny and frail looking black lady presided over the Court trying a famous white man who killed accidentally or otherwise his girlfriend. The entire judicial process on display would have done any country proud. Unresolved legal issues are like festering wounds. They inflict pain and inconvenience you all the time. Recently the Supreme Court of India put to rest one such issue concerning jurisdiction of courts in India to try criminal cases arising out of bounced cheques under the Negotiable Instruments Act. A similar situation has arisen today under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. After having enacted with such fanfare and noble intentions to reduce the workload on the conventional dispute resolution mechanism through courts, today this Act itself is at crossroads and is in danger of being undermined. In a recent judgment in the case of ONGC vs Western Geco International Ltd., the apex court widened scope and circumstances under which a higher judicial authority can sit on judgment on any award given by an Arbitration Tribunal. Till recently the Court could intervene in the arbitration process only under exceptional circumstances involving certain specified matters or in public interest. The Supreme Court in this case has coined a loosely defined legal terminology called 'the fundamental policy of Indian law' which is sought to be brought under public policy. This principle is not only nebulous in nature but is also prone to abuse making this alternate dispute resolution mechanism ineffective. In fact the industry was looking forward to the Supreme Court to write down an earlier Order of the same Court in the case of ONGC vs Saw Pipes Ltd. Instead the Court thought it fit to enhance the Dominating newspaper headlines is second nature to both Apple and Facebook. But then recently both of them were on the front pages of the newspapers for somewhat strange reasons. These companies have announced a new perk to their female employees - free freezing of their eggs. Egg-freezing is a relatively new procedure by which the ova are taken out and frozen with the intention of delaying pregnancy. In this process of manually combining an egg with sperm and then transferring the fertilised egg to the uterus is resorted to whenever the mother is ready to have a baby. Depending on how you look at it, this is technology at its best or at its worst. Employers say that it is voluntary and they would pick up the tag for the entire procedure. Critics say it not about economics; but ethics. A furious debate has erupted all over the world focussed on the ethical dimension of this exercise. Even as some argue that this is a case of interference with nature, others feel 2 Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 verdict given by the Court is correct. But then how far is the verdict right? There is a difference between what is correct and what is right. Correct is a clinical judgment whereas 'right' is slightly more nuanced - a moral or ethical dimension is attached to it like the loss suffered by innocent investors, the loss to the economy on account of shortage of coal, etc. The Court's order probably is in line with the image of the 'Woman of Justice'. This woman is Themis, the Greek goddess of divine justice blindfolded and holding the scales in the left hand and a sword in the right hand. The blindfold symbolises the fact that while giving a judgment the court is guided only by law and not swayed by any other consideration. So be it. ambit and scope to intervene as an appellant authority. These two ONGC cases could sound the death knell to the alternate dispute resolution mechanism in India. At a time when the courts are overburdened and the foreign investors are looking for speedy resolution to commercial disputes, this is definitely not a welcome sign. The Supreme Court has finally given its verdict on the illegal coal block allocation. It has cancelled all the allocations barring a few and has also ordered payment of additional royalty for the coal mined in the past by the allottees. This has opened a Pandora's Box. There are genuine industrial units who have invested in good faith in these mining companies. They will incur huge losses consequent to the apex court verdict for no fault of theirs. Obviously the court cannot validate a right or entitlement obtained by anyone through unfair or illegal means. To this extent the Thank you. Venkat R. Venkitachalam 3 Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 Chapter/ heading/ Sl. No. sub-heading/ tariff item CUSTOMS Notifications: and 323 of the Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated 17.03.2012 is availed Tariff • Time limit for furnishing of certificate from jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner or the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise has been extended from six months to twelve months, to the effect that the Liquefied natural gas (LNG) and Natural gas which has been imported with NIL rate of Customs Duty under Customer Notification 12/2012 dated 17.03.2012 and which is supplied has been utilized for generating and supplying electrical energy by the said generating company. [Notification No 30/ 2014 -Customs dated 20-October-2014] Tariff Value of Imported goods have been further amended as given below: Chapter/ heading/ Sl. No. sub-heading/ tariff item 11 71 or 98 Silver, in any form, in respect of which the benefit of entries at serial number 322 and 324 of the Notification No. 12/2012Customs dated 17.03.2012 is availed 12 080280 Areca nuts 551 per kilogram (US $) 2239 (US $ Per Metric Tons) [Notification No.100/2014-Customs (N.T), Dated 31-October-2014]. Non-Tariff • Description of goods Tariff value US $ (Per Metric Tonne) Description of goods Safeguards: • Tariff value US $ (Per Metric Tonne) No New Notifications Anti-Dumping Duty: • No New Notifications 1 1511 10 00 Crude Palm Oil 704 2 1511 90 10 RBD Palm Oil 737 Circulars: 3 1511 90 90 Others - Palm Oil 721 • 4 1511 10 00 Crude Palmolein 743 5 1511 90 20 RBD Palmolein 746 6 1511 90 90 Others - Palmolein 745 7 1507 10 00 Crude Soyabean Oil 837 8 7404 00 22 Brass Scrap (all grades) 3831 9 1207 91 00 Poppy seeds 3747 10 71 or 98 Gold, in any form, in respect of which the benefit of entries at serial number 321 391 per 10 grams (US $) 4 Technical grade/ material shall not be insisted upon with each imported consignment of formulation of pesticides once such technical grade/ material has been supplied for the purpose of analysis and scrutiny prior to the registration. Further, each consignment of formulation which is imported should be verified and tested so that it matches with the technical grade material regarding specification and quality. [Circular No. 10/2014-Customs dated 17.10.2014] Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 Central Excise Act, 1944 read with provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930. Payment of transport, inclusion of transport charges in value, payment of insurance or who bears the risk are not the relevant considerations to ascertain the place of removal. The place where sale has taken place or when the property in goods passes from the seller to the buyer is the relevant consideration to determine the place of removal. [Circular No. 988/ 12/ 2014-CX dated 20th Oct 2014] Instructions: • It is directed to discontinue certain reports received to TRU through field formations which are no longer required, list of said reports are as specified in Central Excise portion of this update. New system of Monthly Performance Report has been laid down. Please relevant article in this issue. [F.No.354/156/2014 dated 10-October 2014] CENTRAL EXCISE Instructions Notifications • Tariff • No New Notifications Non-Tariff • It is directed to discontinue certain reports received to TRU through field formations which are no longer required, list of said reports are as under: Sr. No. In view of restructuring of Commissionerate, Divisions & Ranges and increase in the numbers for better monitoring, Review Committee of Commissioner of Central Excise has been formed consisting of two Commissioners of Central Excise for the areas falling within the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). [Office Order No.5/2014-CE dated 22nd Oct 2014] 1 Monthly Report on Zarda Scented Tobacco (F. No. 341/24/ 2010-TRU) 2 Monthly Statement in Respect of Clearance and Revenue Realization of All Brands of Cigarettes (F. No. 352/4/84TRU) 3 Cigarette Data- Report (F. No. 341/24/2009-TRU) 4 Component Wise Monthly Revenue from Customs (F. No. 334/1/2005-TRU) 5 Information in Respect of Functioning of Compounded Levy Scheme for Gutkha /Pan Masala (F. No. 336/27/2008-TRU) 6 Import of Vanaspati/Bakery Shortening etc. at nil rate of duty from Nepal and Sri Lanka and at Customs duty of 30% from Countries other than Nepal and Sri Lanka(F. No. 341/ 4/2005-TRU) 7 Statement Showing Monthly Revenue Collection and Cess Collected for Different Commodities (F. No. 333/11/93TRU) 8 Monthly Report regarding Import of Alcoholic Beverages. (F. No. 334/1/2003-TRU) 9 Import Under Indo-Srilanka Free Trade Agreement Monitoring of Quota Allocation 10 Mechanism for Refund Scheme for the 4% Additional CV Duty in those Cases where the Imported Goods are resold and again subjected to Vat/Sales Tax-Monthly Report (F.No. 354/129/2007-TRU) Circulars • • • Department have accepted the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi dated 04.08.2014 in case of M/s Travelite (India) [2014-TIOL-1304HCDEL-ST], thereby no service tax audit can be conducted by departmental officers (other than CERA/CAG). [Circular No. 986/ 10/ 2014-CX dated 9th Oct 2014] Facility of Export Warehousing has also been extended at Bhuj Taluka, in Kutch District in the State of Gujarat. [Circular No. 987/ 11/ 2014CX dated 15th Oct 2014] CBEC finally appreciated contradiction in their circular vis-à-vis legal provisions, therefore further clarification has been issued. Accordingly determination of Place of Removal has been clarified and reiterated that the place of removal needs to be ascertained in term of provisions of 5 Name of the Report Bizsol UPDATE Sr. No. and use their discretionary powers of pre-audits. [Instruction F. No. 206/05/2014-CX.6 dated 3rd Nov., 2014] Name of the Report 11 Data on Imports of Wheat (F. No. 354/88/2010-TRU) 12 Data on Export of Chromium Ores and Concentrates (F. No. 334/1/2008-TRU) 13 Data in respect of Man-Made Fibers and Filament Yarn (F. No. 335/2/2005-TRU) 14 Data on Revenue from Levy of 10% Excise Duty on Ready Made Garments and Made Up Articles Bearing a Brand Name or Sold Under a Brand Name Falling under Chapters 61,62 and 63 (F. No. 336/255/2011-TRU) 15 November - 2014 Trade Notice • Restructuring of Central Excise and Service Tax of Pune, Kolhapur, Goa has been made with effect from 15.10.2014 vide trade notice no 01 dated 10.10.2014. Copy of the trade notice is already circulated by mail. Considering your location select appropriate Commissionerate, Division, Range and their codes and ensure that: Data in respect of Exports and Imports of Cotton and Cotton waste (F. No.354/164/2006-TRU) [Instruction F. No.354/156/2014-TRU dated 10th Oct, 2014] • At present there are more than 100 reports that are being sent by the field formations on a monthly basis to various Directorates and sections of the Board. But, the present reporting system within the Department suffers from the problem of unreliability and susceptibility to error as it involves manual compilation at various stages as well as no two reports ever tally. Therefore it is decided to lay down the strategic roadmap for the development of the MIS. So that to provide reliable, accurate and up-to-date information, to help the policy makers in taking accurate and fast decisions. The MIS will be implemented in a phased manner, as stated below:1. First Stage: Online / Web-uploading of information in predefined formats: 2. Second Stage: Digital recording of critical events: 3. Third Stage: Integration of modules and process automation: Same is mentioned on your Excise Invoice / Service Tax Invoice 2. Inform the above to all your vendors and service providers 3. Incorporate changes in the system 4. File the return whenever due with correct Range code, Division and Commissionerate based on your location Further, units will get the mail from respective Jurisdictional Range Officers specifying Range Division and also a map will be uploaded on website of Pune Excise Commissionerate. [Trade notice no 01 dated 10.10.2014] SERVICE TAX Notifications • Due date of filing of Service Tax Return for the period from April 14 to September 14 has been extended from 25th October 2014 to 14th November 2014. [Order No 2/2014 F.No. 137/ 99/2011 dated 24.10.2014] Circulars / Instructions • Following clarification has been issued w.r.t. levy of service tax on activities involved in relation to inward remittances from abroad to beneficiaries in India through MTSOs Please read the relevant article in this issue. [Instruction F. No. 296/127/2013-CX-9 dated 10th Oct, 2014] • 1. Avoidance of pre-audit of rebate claim cannot be done and therefore filing number of rebate claim less than Rs. 5 lacs will not avoid pre-audits, since these can be clubbed by the authorities 6 S.No. Issues Clarification 1 Whether service tax is payable on remittance received in India from abroad? No service tax is payable per se on the amount of foreign currency remitted to India from overseas. As the remittance comprises Bizsol UPDATE S.No. 2 3 4 Issues Whether the service of an agent or the representation service provided by an Indian entity/ bank to a foreign money transfer service operator (MTSO) in relation to money transfer falls in the category of intermediary service? Whether service tax is leviable on the service provided, by an intermediary/agent located in India (in taxable territory) to MTSOs located outside India? Whether service tax would apply on the amount charged separately, if any, by the Indian bank/entity/agent/ sub-agent from the person who receives remittance in the taxable territory, for the service provided by such Indian bank/entity/agent/subagent November - 2014 Clarification S.No. Issues Clarification money, it does not in itself constitute any service in terms of the definition of 'service' as contained in clause (44) of section 65B of the Finance Act 1994. 5 Whether service tax would apply on the services provided by way of currency conversion by a bank /entity located in India (in the taxable territory) to the recipient of remittance in India? Any activity of money changing comprises an independent taxable activity. Therefore, service tax applies on currency conversion in such cases in terms of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules. Service provider has an option to pay service tax at prescribed rates in terms of Rule 6(7B) of the Service Tax Rules 1994. 6 Whether services provided by sub-agents to such Indian Bank/ entity located in the taxable territory in relation to money transfer is leviable to service tax? Sub-agents also fall in the category of intermediary. Therefore, service tax is payable on commission received by subagents from Indian bank/entity. Yes. The Indian bank or other entity acting as an agent to MTSO in relation to money transfer, facilitates in the delivery of the remittance to the beneficiary in India. In performing this service, the Indian Bank/entity facilitates the provision of Money transfer Service by the MTSO to a beneficiary in India. For their service, agent receives commission or fee. Hence, the agent falls in the category of intermediary as defined in rule 2(f) of the Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012. [Circular No 180/06/2014-ST dated 14-102014] • Service provided by an intermediary is covered by rule 9 (c) of the Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012. As per this rule, the place of provision of service is the location of service provider. Hence, service provided by an agent, located in India (in taxable territory), to MTSO is liable to service tax. The value of intermediary service provided by the agent to MTSO is the commission or fee or any similar amount, by whatever name called, received by it from MTSO and service tax is payable on such commission or fee. No New Instructions!! FOREIGN TRADE POLICY Notifications: • Yes. As the service is provided by Indian bank/entity/agent/subagent to a person located in taxable territory, the Place of Provision is in the taxable territory. Therefore, service tax is payable on amount charged separately, if any. Export of Dried Silk Worm Pupae to EU has been allowed subject to the following conditions: (i) A 'Shipment Clearance Certificate' is to be issued consignment-wise by the CAPEXIL indicating details of the name and address of the exporter, address of the registered plant, IEC No. of the exporter, plant approval number, nature of export product, quantity, invoice number and date, port of loading (Name of the port) and destination. (ii) After the shipment is made, the exporter shall also provide a 'Health Certificate" consignment wise to the buyer giving details of vessel name, shipping bill number with date, etc. as per the requirement of EU. The certificate would be issued jointly by CAPEXIL & Regional Animal Quarantine Officer, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, and Government of India. [Notification No. 95 (RE-2013)/2009-2014 dated 22/10/2014] 7 Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 Public Notices: • • Application for grant of exit permission (inprinciple approval) from SEZ Scheme 8. Annual Performance Report (APR) 9. Application for approval of Job-work (subcontracting) No New Public Notices Special Economic Zone • 7. Last date for receipt of application for the posts of Joint Development Commissioner for Noida & Indore SEZ and Deputy Development Commissioner on deputation basis in NSEZ, Noida, FSEZ, Kolkatta, MEPZ, Chennai, CSEZ, Cochin, KASEZ, Kandla & VSEZ, Vishakhapatnam has been extended from 10th October, 2014 to 5th November, 2014. [Notification No. F. No. A-4/6/2013-SEZ dated 01/10/2014] 10. Application for intimation of date of commencement of production 11. Intimation of date of commencement of production 12. Grievance form (this is available for all entities) [Notification No. F. No. D. [2/25/2012-SEZ dated 28/10/2014] • All the SEZ Developers, Co-developers & Units are required to make online applications for various applications, permissions, approvals, intimations, reporting required to & from the Office of the Development Commissioner & Department of Commerce with effect from 1st November, 2014 which are as follows: FOR SEZ DEVELOPERS: 1. Application for approval of Authorized operations (Form C7) 2. Application for extension of the validity period of Formal Letter of Approval (Form C1) 3. Application for Extension of the validity period of in-principle Letter of Approval (Form C2) 4. Application for approval of Job-work (subcontracting) 5. Quarterly/half-yearly returns (Form E) All the SEZ Developers, Co-developers & Units are requested to follow the standardised formats for the following activities which are to be monitored by all the zones: 1. For utilization of the goods by the Developer/ Co-Developer (Certificate of Chartered Engineer) 2. For obtaining approval of material for authorized operations by the Developer/Codeveloper (Certificate of Chartered Engineer) 3. Information required for renewal of LoA for 5 years. 4. Lease Deed 5. Annual Performance Report of the Unit [Notification No. F. No. D. [12/25/2012-SEZ dated 28/10/2014] INCOME TAX FOR SEZ UNITS: Notification: 1. Application for setting up units in SEZs • 2. Application for Renewal of LoA CBDT has issued FORM 13 for Application by a person for a certificate under sections 197 for no deduction/collection of tax or deduction/ collection of tax at a lower rate. [Notification 46/2014 dated 24th Sept 2014] • Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the Polish People's Republic amended the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the Polish People's Republic for 3. Application for intimation of Jewellery exhibitions abroad 4. Application for permission of Jewellery exhibitions abroad. 5. Application for permission for setting up a DRlBCP centre by IT units 6. Application for permission for movement of data backup tape by IT units 8 Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income. [Notification 47/2014 dated 29th Sept 2014] • COMPANY LAW Notifications • For financial years commencing on or after 1st April 2015, the Auditor's Report shall also state about existence of adequate internal financials control system and its operating effectiveness. Provided that the auditor of the company may voluntarily include such statement for audit of FY April 14 to March 15. Accordingly the Companies (Audit & Auditors) Rules, 2014 have been amended. [Notification G.S.R. -(E) dated 14th Oct 2014 ] • The provisions w.r.t preparation of consolidated financial statements shall not be applied to an intermediate wholly owned subsidiary, other than a wholly-owned subsidiary whose immediate parent is a company incorporated outside India. Accordingly the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 have been amended. [Notification G.S.R. -(E) dated 14th Oct 2014] • Now the activities towards 'Contribution to the Swach Bharat Kosh' set-up by the Central Government for the promotion of sanitation as well as 'Contribution to the Clean Ganga Fund' set-up by the Central Government for rejuvenation of river Ganga are allowed to be inserted in CSR policy by the Companies. [Notification G.S.R. -(E) dated 24th Oct 2014] • Amendment in Company Law Board (Fees on Applications and Petitions) Rules, 2014 as under: Principal Director General or Director General or Principal Director or Director will be the person authorized for the purposes of calling and verifying of information in its possession relating to any person under section 133C i.e. in case of proceeding under Survey. [Notification 48/2014 dated 30th Sept 2014] Circular: • Technical manpower is also considered as asset at par with plant & machinery but limit has been enhanced from 20% to 50%. It means, existing technical manpower can be shifted to SEZ Unit which will not be considered as splitting up of business. [Circular 14/2014 dated 8th Oct 2014] • The concessional rate of withholding tax has been extended to borrowing by way of any long term bonds, not limited to a long term infrastructure bond, if the borrowing is made on or after 1st day of October, 2014. Further, the concluding date of the period of borrowings eligible for concession under Section194LC which was earlier 01/07/2015 has been extended to borrowings made before the 1st day of July, 2017. [Circular 15/2014 dated 17th Oct 2014] MVAT Sr.No. Particulars of Application Notification: 34 • Dealer who are liable to file the return and have not uploaded the requisite annexure along with monthly return for the period April 14 to July 14, and quarterly return for the period April 14 to June 14, shall electronically upload the annexures alongwith the return for the period ending 30th Sept 14 in the templates, provided on the website. [Notification VAT/AMD 2014/ 1B/Adm 8 Dt. 16th October 2014.] Fees (Rs) Allowing any period other than April to March as financial year. 5,000 35 Rectification of register of members. 500 36 Directing the company to pay the sum due or for any loss or damage incurred as a result of such non-payment. 100 37 Allow further time as considered reasonable to the company to repay the deposit. 5,000 [Notification G.S.R. - dated 3rd Nov, 2014] Circular Circulars: • • No new circular 9 Ambiguity in the provision w.r.t. refund of the deposit of Rs. 1 Lac received from the person Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 other than retiring director who stands for directorship in Section 8 Companies formed for charitable objects, it is clarified that, if the said director fails to secure more than twenty five per cent of the total valid votes then the Board of directors should decide as to whether the deposit made by or on behalf of said person is to be forfeited or refunded. [General Circular No.38/ 2014 dated 14th Oct 2014] • • • FEMA (Important Circulars) • In respect of manner of presentation of notes in Consolidated Financial Statements (CFS), it has been clarified that Schedule lll to the Co's. Act 2013 read with the applicable Accounting Standards does not envisage that a company while preparing its CFS merely repeats the disclosures made by it under stand-alone accounts being consolidated. In the CFS, the company would need to give all disclosures relevant for CFS only. [General Circular No.39/ 2014 dated 14th Oct 2014] As per Circular No. 28 [A. P. (FL/RL Series) Circular No. 02] dated February 6, 2008 and the Annex to the A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No 88 dated January 9, 2014, limited transactions as per guidelines under Part (B) Permitted Transactions of Annex to A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No.88 dated January 9, 2014 were permitted through exchange houses. It has been decided by the RBI to permit remittances to the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund through the Exchange Houses subject to the condition that remittances are directly credited to the Fund by the banks and the banks maintain full details of the remitters.[RBI/2014-15/257 A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.35 October 9, 2014] • The Company Law Settlement Scheme 2014 for filing of pending Annual Returns and Financial Statements by defaulting companies with concessional penalties at 25% has been extended up to 15th Nov 2014. [General Circular No.40/2014 dated 15th Oct 2014] As per Regulation under Circular no. 117 dated April 4, 2014 and the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000 notified by the Government of India vide G.S.R.No.383 (E) dated 3rd May 2000, regarding delegation of powers to the Regional Offices of the Reserve Bank of India to compound the contraventions of FEMA. In Notification of the RBI dated 16 October, 2014, it has been decided to delegate further powers to Regional Offices (except Kochi and Panaji) for compounding the Contraventions under FEMA Regulations without any limit on the amount of contravention. Kochi and Panaji Regional offices can compound contraventions for amount of contravention below Rupees one hundred lakh (Rs.1,00,00,000/-). It has been clarified that, in case of companies, who have filed their balance sheets and annual returns on or after 01.04.2014 but prior to launch of CLSS-2014 then disqualification of directors as per clause (a) of sub-section (2) of Section 164 of Companies Act, 2013 shall apply only for the prospective defaults if any by such companies. [General Circular No.41/2014 dated 15th Oct 2014] The modifications mentioned in the Notification have come into force with immediate effect. For more details see the Notification. [RBI/2014-15/ 266 A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.36 October 16,2014] 10 Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 CBEC Notified Exchange Rate for Conversion of Foreign Currency w. e. f. 06th November 2014 [Notification No.101/2014-Customs (N.T) Dated 05th November-2014] SCHEDULE - I Rate of exchange of one unit of foreign currency equivalent to Indian rupees S.No. Foreign Currency (For Imported Goods) (For Export Goods) 54.50 53.00 167.55 158.40 1. Australian Dollar 2. Bahrain Dinar 3. Canadian Dollar 54.55 53.30 4. Danish Kroner 10.50 10.20 5. EURO 78.00 76.15 6. Hong Kong Dollar 8.00 7.85 7. Kuwait Dinar 218.05 205.65 8. New Zealand Dollar 48.75 47.50 9. Norwegian Kroner 9.10 8.85 10. Pound Sterling 99.50 97.30 11. Singapore Dollar 48.20 47.15 12. South African Rand 5.70 5.40 13. Saudi Arabian Riyal 16.85 15.90 14. Swedish Kroner 8.45 8.20 15. Swiss Franc 64.85 63.30 16. UAE Dirham 17.20 16.25 17. US Dollar 61.90 60.90 SCHEDULE-II Rate of exchange of 100 units of foreign currency equivalent to Indian rupees S.No. Foreign Currency (For Imported Goods) (For Export Goods) 1. Japanese Yen 54.65 53.40 2. Kenya Shilling 70.50 66.55 11 Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 ALERT - DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RESTRUCTURED, HAVE YOU? By CMA Ashok B. Nawal Towards the path of GST, Central Excise & Service Tax department is getting augmented and therefore more Commissionerate & more divisions have been made by way of restructuring. Separate Service Tax Commissionerate & Audit Commissionerate has been made. iv. Separate post for Principal Chief Commissioner & Principal Commissioner has been created. Now, 8 Principal Chief Commissionerate at office has been made at Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Lucknow, Mumbai - I, Kolkata, Vadodara, Large Taxpayer Unit (LTU). Number of Commissionerate has been created so as to reduce geographical area and similarly number of divisions have been made. Number of inspectors have been promoted as Superintendent and number of Superintendent have been promoted as Asst. Commissioner of Central Excise mainly with the object of stricter monitoring of implementation of the law. Audit divisions are separately made and they have been empowered for audit as well as issuance of Show Cause Notice. Staffing Norms: The proposed sections in the Audit Headquarters will be: i. Planning and coordination section to look after scheduling and support in conduct of MCM (Monitoring Committee Meeting), maintenance and Updation of Assessee Master File, maintenance of Records / Registers and submission of reports to look after formation / constitution of audit groups and deployment of officers matching skills with audit requirement, maintenance of database of officer's profile, training needs of officers. ii. Administration, Personnel & Vigilance section to look after administrative matters, transfer, leave, allowances, budgetary grants, vigilance matters etc. iii. Technical section to look after draft Show Cause Notices, audit follow up, court cases, Board's circulars, instructions etc. Risk Management and Quality Assurance section to look after risk based selection of units, use of Third Party Source of Information, maintenance of Audit database of units to be audited, selecting them / issues for audit, performance appraisal and Quality Assurance. 1. Headquarters shall be manned by one Commissioner, two Additional or Joint Commissioners and three or four Deputy Commissioners. 2. Each Audit Circle shall be headed by Deputy or Assistant Commissioner and will also comprise of Audit Groups. The Audit Groups deployed for large units should comprise of 2-3 Superintendents and 4-6 Inspectors. For Medium units the Audit Group should include 1 - 2 Superintendents and 2 - 4 Inspectors. For Small units the Audit Group should include, 1 Superintendent and 1 - 2 Inspectors. 3. Groups for Large units, Medium units and Small units should be in such number that the following distribution of manpower deployment in audit groups is achieved. a. 50% of manpower to Large units b. 30% of manpower to Medium units c. 10 % of manpower to Small units d. 10% of manpower for planning, coordination and follow up. Functions of Audit Commissionerate 1. 12 Monitoring Committee Meeting (MCM) should be convened by Audit Commissionerate, for which the Executive Commissioner or his representative will be invited to attend. The decision with regard to settlement of an audit objections after recovery of all dues or dropping of the unsustainable audit objections shall vest with the Audit Commissioner. Approved audit objections Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 Executive Commissionerates. Audit Commissionerates may refer, with the approval of the MCM, any case arising out of audit where detailed investigation is necessary to the Executive Commissionerates. including those in which show cause notices are proposed to be issued should be conveyed to the Executive Commissioner in the form of Minutes of the MCMs, who shall respond to these objections conveying his agreement/ disagreement within 15 days of the receipt of the minutes of the MCM. 2. On points of difference, further consultations may be held for a maximum period of 15 days. In case the difference persists, the final decision to issue show cause notice rests with the Audit Commissioner. 3. Audit Commissionerate shall issue the show cause notice, wherever necessary, after the audit objections are confirmed in the MCMs. The show cause notice shall be answerable to and adjudicated by the Executive Commissioner or the subordinate officers of the Executive Commissionerate as per the adjudication limits prescribed the Board. Audit function will end with the issuance of show cause notice and further action including adjudication and follow-up shall be the responsibility of Executive Commissioner. 4. Litigation after adjudication proceedings (including defending the order before the appellate forums-Commissioner (Appeals)/ Tribunals/Courts) shall be the responsibility of Executive Commissioner. However, Audit Commissionerates shall remain closely associated and provide inputs wherever required. 5. The function of pre-audit/post-audits of refunds, rebates and brand rate fixation of drawback shall continue with the jurisdictional Executive Commissionerate. 6. CERA audit shall be attended by the Executive Commissionerate by compiling necessary information and replying to the audit objections raised by C&AG. Audit Commissioners will have no role either in compiling / furnishing information to CERA or replying to the C&AG objections. However, it is desirable that Audit Commissionerate is aware of the objections raised by C&AG. Therefore, copy of the objections received from CERA and replies furnished by the Executive Commissioner shall be forwarded to the Audit Commissionerate by the Executive Commissionerate. 7. Anti-evasion functions shall continue with the 8. Special Audit shall be ordered by the Audit Commissionerates. Section 14A / 14AA of CEA, 1944 and Section 72A of the Finance Act, 1994 provide for such special audits in the specified circumstances by Cost Accountants / Chartered Accountants. The Audit Commissioners shall be the competent authority to order Special Audit, either on their own satisfaction or on a reference received from the Executive Commissioner. 9. Audit should be so conducted that the assessee is least inconvenienced. Documents as prescribed in the manual should be called and preparatory work finalized ahead of audit. Audit should be completed expeditiously and as soon as the Final Audit Report is prepared, it should be ensured that a copy of the Final Audit Report including 'NIL' report is dispatched or provided to the assessee under acknowledgement to be kept in Assessee Master File. 10. Currently, audit is undertaken for each tax separately even though the business and financial records verified during the audit remains common for all the three tax administered by the Board . In order to improve the efficiency of audit process, it has been decided that coordinated and integrated audit covering two or more taxes for assessees having common PAN shall be carried out. Necessary legal enablement has been provided in the notification conferring territorial jurisdiction to the Commissionerates such that Service Tax Audit Commissionerates can audit Central Excise assessees within a zone and vice-versa. An assessee who is registered under Central Excise, Service Tax and Customs need not be subjected to three separate audits. The information about his various registrations is available and such assessees would be subjected to a complete audit by the designated Audit Commissionerate. For this purpose the Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner will assign the audit of an assessee to a particular Audit Commissionerate, based on payment of Central Excise duty or Service tax whichever is higher. Following the 13 Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 same principle OSPCA would be also be carried out by the designated Central Excise or Service Tax Audit Commissionerate, in an integrated manner. 11. availability of data for data-mining to the concerned officer should be minimized. Since scrutiny of return is one of the core functions, it should be properly monitored at zonal level. It is proposed to issue risk based audit norms in due course of time. In the interim the existing audit norms may be used to ensure that audit functions continue efficiently. 6. The criteria for selection of units for audit should take into account the antecedents of the unit. If a unit has complied with legal and procedural requirements, then, whether such unit could be considered for exemption from audit for a year or more need to be examined. It was explained that present system allows for giving Accredited Status to the units (to be audited mandatorily), if such units are legally and procedurally compliant. 7. Recovery arising from non-fulfillment of export obligation be reported by TAR as recovery of arrears, if not being done already. CH (EC) pointed out that computerization of TAR is very important, and a database of defaulters would help in monitoring progress. In other words frequency of audit, time span of audit will be increased and it will be more focused on record based control with ERP system. Moreover, Conference of Chief Commissioners have decided certain action agenda some of which are briefly given below: 1. Chief Commissioners should strictly monitor the key result areas, have regular interactions with the major tax payers (to ascertain the projected revenue), re-deploy the staff with in their zone as per the need and if required, Board approval can be sought for such temporary redeployment. 2. There should be sharing of best practices across the country through greater interaction amongst the field formations. It was impressed upon officers that the Board should be informed about any major changes affecting the revenue collection. 3. Non-sanctioning of refund/drawback claim in the guise of revenue drive is not acceptable. All refund / drawback claim should be sanctioned within the time limit prescribed for such claims. 4. Since ownership of process is important, DG (Insp) should be made the process owner for monitoring revenue augmentation through return scrutiny. 5. Moreover, Monthly Performance Reports for Central Excise Service Tax and customs are separately prescribed which provides the information w.r.t. Revenue, Anti-evasion, audit, adjudication, legal & TAX arrears Pending adjudications are required to be submitted and the same will be analyzed by Chief Commissioner & Principal Chief Commissioner. To conclude, department is now well organized to find out the evasion whether intentional or un-intentional and provisions of arrest with non-bailable and bailable have been incorporated in the law. Similarly, provisions for recovery has been made stricter mainly to ensure 100% statutory compliance. Now, it is the duty of each assessee to be 100% statutory compliant by way of establishing full proof computerized system, regular internal checks, regular audits by experts and built in internal control. An SOP for use of Returns Scrutiny by Ranges / Divisions to augment Revenue to be made by Pune-III, for circulations to all field formations. Since EDW software license (Business AuthorQuery Studio) is expensive, hence, initially such licenses can be procured for divisional level officer. Member (CX) suggested that suitable modification should be made by DG (Systems) in the existing system so that a pre-defined query can be built-in for data mining and retrieval tool at par with EDW system. It was also suggested that time lag between filing of returns and Assessee will have no option but any person doesn't get equipped and works in the same manner as he/ she is working, then hard days are ahead. In the era of liberalization at one end Govt. has introduced selfassessment system and "Inspection Raj" is removed, on another end Jurisdictional Geographical area has been reduced for stricter monitoring the assessee and therefore it is a high time to tighten the belt and introduce better controls. 14 Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 CENTRAL EXCISE v v Appeal to High Court against non-speaking and unreasoned order maintainable even if issue involved related to determination of rate of duty not directly involved : Even if issue which arose in appeals was not in relation to rate of Customs duty or to value of goods for the purpose of assessment, appeal is maintainable before the Hon'ble High Court. In the present case, dispute being about the carotenoid content i.e. beta carotene in imported crude palm oil for the purpose of determination of rate for levy of duty, Hon'ble CESTAT held that such question did not have a direct and proximate relationship to the rate of Customs duty or to value of goods for the purpose of assessment. While passing impugned order, Hon'ble Tribunal relied upon the report of private laboratory for holding that carotene content was under 500 mg/kg having reduced due to passage of time, change in atmosphere condition and temperature, though possibility of such reduction was not mentioned in the Standard Technical Literature. Hence, appeal held maintainable before High Court, more so, when order passed by the Tribunal was non speaking order and unreasoned. [2014(307)E.L.T.852(Guj.)] Valuation of job worked goods: Goods are sold by the Principal Manufacturer to the buyers. Buyers of goods are not related parties and price is the sole consideration. Value of goods shall be transaction value of goods sold by the Principal Manufacturer. Assessee has discharged duty on sale price of principal manufacturer hence, provisions of Rule 10A(i) of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 will attract. Since, Assseess has rightly valued the goods hence, demand has been set aside. [2014(307)E.L.T. 915(Tri. Mumbai)] 15 v Scope of Show Cause Notice: Department has issued show cause notice for undervaluation of goods. At the time of adjudication, issue of classification of goods was not considered by adjudicating authority on the ground that classification issue was not raised in show cause notice. But assessee's submission is that if issue of classification decided in assessee's favour, then there would be no question of duty demand based on undervaluation. Since, while passing the order, Appellate authority has not considered all the facts, matter remanded to adjudicating authority for considering classification of goods issue. Further, it has been also held that determination of cost of production be determined on the basis of CAS-4 standard of ICWAI. [2014(307)E.L.T. 904(Tri.Del.)] v Duty of plastic waste and scrap arising as a by-product: Demand of duty on plastic waste and scrap arising as a by-product has been set aside by the authority and department has filed appeal against the said order on the ground that once cenvat credit having been taken on inputs, the inputs became non duty paid and such that condition of exemption under Notification No. 53/ 88-C.E. had been violated. Hon'ble CESTAT held that no where in the Central Excise Act, 1944 or Rules it has been stated that once credit is taken, the inputs become non duty paid and this fact cannot be erased or obliterated by what happens subsequently. Hence, benefit of Notification No. 53/88-C.E. cannot be denied on waste and scrap of plastics manufactured from duty paid products. Further, Hon'ble Bench held that plastic waste and scrap arising in the course of manufacture of BOPP films cannot be considered as final product, thus credit rightly taken on inputs contained in the waste and scrap of plastics which arose as a by-product. [2014(307)E.L.T. 961(Tri. Mumbai)] v Cenvat credit on inputs loss during transit is admissible: Assessee's inputs i.e. Lube base Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 oil was transported through pipeline. If any goods are transported through pipeline or by any other means of transports, if they are not solid, there is every chance of loss of quantity of goods by way of evaporation. Transit loss is varying between 0.01 and 0.72% which is admissible and hence, assesse is entitled for cenvat credit on the inputs as shown in invoices. [2014(307) E.L.T.919 (Tri. Mumbai)] v v v straightway cannot be said to be admission on behalf of the assessee accepting duty liability, as there would be no question of further adjudication by Central Excise Officer. [2014(308)E.L.T.407(Guj.)] Admissibility of 100% Cenvat credit on the capital goods in first financial year: Assessee has availed 100% Cenvat credit on the capital goods in the first financial year while being eligible to avail credit of only 50% of central excise duty paid. Department has demanded the duty alognwith interest and penalty. When issue was only of availment of entire credit in first financial year and not the eligibility to avail credit, such contravention needs to be condoned. Further, Assessee has already paid appropriate interest on the amount of excess credit, hence, such issue of recovery of excess credit does not arise. [2014(307)E.L.T.889(Tri.Ahmd.)] Appeal itself decided at the stage of hearing stay application by a cryptic order not proper-CESTAT order set aside and matter remanded: Hon'ble CESTAT has disposed off the appeal itself in favour of the assesse at the stage of consideration of stay application by two paragraphs order containing to reasoning virtually in one paragraph, without referring to background facts. Though assesse could draw some support case laws cited by them, but that aspect was vital and Tribunal should have adverted to rival contentions on same and thereafter passed reasoned order. It was more so as that case law was prima facie distinguishable. Hence, order passed by the Hon'ble CESTAT being inadequate with cryptic reasoning set aside. [2014(308)E.L.T.416(Bom.)] v Remission of duty: Semi finished goods/work in process destroyed in fire accident. Assessee not liable to pay duty of semi finished goods as such no requirement to file remission application. Commissioner(Appeals) has not confirmed any duty against assessee and therefore, rejection of application not to adversely effect assessee. [2014(308)E.L.T.431(Tri.del.)] v Date of effect of Amalgamation when not specified by the High Court: Hon'ble High Court has not specified specific date of amalgamation in their Order dated 01.10.1997. In such case effective date of amalgamation transfer should be 22.10.1997, the date when the transfer company filed the certified copy of court's order dated 01.10.1997 with the Registrar of the Companies. Thus, date of amalgamation transfer will be 22.10.1997 and consequently Assessee are eligible for SSI exemption Notification up to 21.10.1997. Further, in spite of written request by the assesse, Adjudicating Authority has not supplied the copies of challans seized by the Department. There are no evidences produced that copies of all records were supplied to the Assessee to explain their case. Since Adjudicating Authority has confirmed the demand by violating the principals of Natural justice, demand has been set aside and matter remanded for readjudication. [2014(308)E.L.T.421(Tri.Ahmd.)] Material produced before Settlement Commission admissible as evidence even if, proceedings before it failed: Evidentiary value of material produced before settlement Commission will be there when proceedings before settlement commission failed. Whatever is admitted by the assesse while submitting application before Settlement Commission under Section 32E of Central Excise Act, 1944 16 v Post sale expenses not includible in Assessable Value: Goods are manufactured under Joint Venture agreement and 100% sold to buyer. Advertisement and sales promotion expenses borne by buyer of the goods. Buyer marketed goods to ultimate consumers. No evidence of any flowback of consideration from Buyer to Assessee. Hence, post export expenses such as advertisement and sales promotion not includible in the assessable value of the goods. [2014(308)E.L.T.61(Tri.Mumbai)] v Job worker to be treated as manufacturer: Assessee got steel racks and trollyes Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 comes up for consideration, party likely to be adversely affected by same and party should be given an opportunity of rebut new findings/facts. No such opportunity was given to the assesse, hence, principles of natural justice violated. [2014(308) E.L.T.99 (Tri .Del.)] manufactured in their factory through bonafide Industrial works on job work basis out of raw material supplied by them and besides supplying raw material, they have also provided to job worker the drawings and designs of trollyes and racks to be fabricated. In respect of workers, employed by job worker, it is the job worker who is responsible for providing the benefits under ESI and PF scheme to the workers employed by him. Department has not provided the evidences that job worker is dummy unit floated by assessee or is an agent of assessee. Hence, job worker to be treated as the manufacturer and just because the raw materials and drawings and designs of racks and trolleys to be fabricated were supplied by them the assessee would not become the manufacturer. [2014(308)E.L.T.151(Tri.Del.)] v v v Export rebate: Exporter has paid duty on CIF value and filed rebate claim for the same. Ocean freight and Insurance incurred beyond the port, being place of removal cannot be part of transaction value in terms of statutory provisions, and hence, rebate of excess duty paid on said portion of value which was in excess of transaction value was rejected. Once the place of removal is decided within the geographical limit of country, it cannot be beyond the port of loading of export goods. Re-credit of excess paid duty may be allowed in cenvat Credit account from where it was paid subject to compliance of provisions of Section 12B of Central Excise Act, 1944. [2014(308)E.L.T.198(G.O.I.)] Charges of clandestine removal are required to be established by tangible and corroborative evidence and mere confessional statement of employee is not sufficient: Assessee not having weigh-bridge in their factory premises. Contention that raw materials/finished goods accounting was done only on eye estimation basis is to be accepted in as much as there was no record that goods were taken outside the factory for weighment purpose. Neither weighment slip produced by revenue nor buyers stands identified by the Revenue to suggest clandestine removal of their final products, hence demand not sustainable. [2014(308)E.L.T.154(Tri.Del.)] Principles of adjudication: As per guidelines of adjudication manual, when any new facts 17 v Reversal of Cenvat credit alongwith interest on common inputs used for manufacture of exempted as well dutiable goods: Assesse has used inputs in manufacture of dutiable as well as exempted goods. Since, they not maintained separate records, they have reversed Cenvat credit with interest in respect of inputs used in manufacture of exempted final products cannot be said to have taken credit of inputs used in or in relation to manufacture of exempted final products. Hence, Assessee need not pay an amount @8% or 10% of sale price of exempted final products. Hence, matter remanded for verification of assessee's claim of reversal of cenvat credit on inputs attributable to manufacture of exempted final products. [2014(308) E.L.T.81 (Tri .Ahmd.)] v Hon'ble High Court allows rebate on fuel supplied to foreign-run aircrafts from airport fuelling station: Notification No. 19/2004-CE (N.T.) allows rebate on excisable goods exported after duty payment, directly from factory / warehouse except as otherwise permitted by CBEC. In the present matter factual findings of lower authorities as regards supply of Aviation Turbine Fuel (ATF) to aircrafts on foreign run from Aviation Fueling Station (AFS), denotes compliance with Notification No.19/2004. Hence, no necessity of looking into any other compliance and Revenue's contention that assessee failed to establish co-relation of goods cleared from factory to those supplied to foreign run aircrafts requires remand of matter. Hon'ble High Court directed for disbursal of refund claim stating that Govt. should not indulge in harassing its own arm/entity. [TS-503-HC-2014(BOM)-EXC] v CESTAT Allows SAD exemption & Education Cess credit utilization on EOU - DTA stock transfer: Hon'ble CESTAT allows Special Additional Duty (SAD) exemption on stock transfer by EOU to units in DTA under Notification No. 23/2003-CE. A plain interpretation of condition that 'goods must not be exempted by Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 State Govt. from sales tax / VAT' in said Notification, must to determine exemption eligibility. Refuses to examine leviability of sales tax on stock transfer as contended by Revenue, since assessee paid tax on such clearances. Further, Hon'ble Bench allows utilization of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess credit for duty payment on DTA clearances, excise duty aggregate of customs duties leviable u/s 3 of Central Excise Act. In this case ratio of Larger Bench's Moser Baer ruling inapplicable as EOU exempt from local sales tax ab initio in that case and on the other hand, Hon'ble Bench refers to AAR decision in GE India Industrial Pvt. Ltd. [TS-494-Tribunal-2014-EXC] finalizing the Bill of Entry for the purpose of assessment, authority is bound to inform importer about variation proposed and the reasons for the same. The said process would meet the essence of fair play, such that no person would think itself a target for arbitrary and unfair behavior on the part of authorities. Hence, Hon'ble High Court has set aside the said order and directed for issuance of fresh order of finalization of assessment after following principles of Natural Justice. [2014(307)E.L.T.874(Bom.)] v Strictures against Department for failure to comply with Tribunal's Order: It has been observed by the Hon'ble Bench that in most of the cases due to absence of instructions from the field and Revenue, Departmental Representatives cannot defend the case as they are helpless without the instructions from the field staff. Hence, Bench directed that Chief Departmental Representative to take up the matter before higher authorities so that Departmental Representative shall be prepared with full information and instruction to assist the Bench. [2014(307)E.L.T.914(Tri.Del.)] v Natural Justice: At the time of adjudication process Department has denied the cross examination of two officers of assessee. Although assessee has filed reply to show cause notice, on the last day of hearing when the assesse was prevented to appear for hearing, order was passed on next day. Further, the said order did not taken into consideration various grievances raised in reply to show cause notice. After considering all these facts, Hon'ble Bench has asked Assessee to file a note justifying the reason why cross- examination is required and also the chronology of dates on which assessee was required to appear and outcome thereof. Further, prayer of assessee to allow opportunity to produce certain documents allowed by the Hon'ble Bench. [2014(307)E.L.T.913(Tri.Del.)] v Provisionally released imported machines can be used for manufacturing activity: Assessee has evaded customs duty on the software required for operation of machine and hence, that goods are seized by the Department. However, those goods are provisionally released to the assessee for safe keeping subject to rigorous conditions. Assessee has filed petition CUSTOMS v v Mere issuing or dispatch of SCN not sufficient - Receipt or deemed receipt of the Notice necessary: When goods are proposed to be confiscated or penalty imposed, person concerned has to be notified of the ground thereof. This can only happen when the person from whom goods have been seized, receives the notice and understands the grounds proposed. Notice can be regarded as having been 'given' only when it is actually received or deemed to be received by the person from whom the goods have been seized and same gives the person an opportunity to make a representation in writing so that order confiscating or not confiscating the goods may be passed. Thus, mere issuance or dispatch of notice would not amount to 'giving' of notice, instead, 'giving' would be complete if the notice reached the person concerned or if notice after having been tendered, had been refused. [2014(307) E.L.T.837(Del.)] Finalization of provisional assessmentDepartment bound to inform the assessee before changing provisional assessment: Provisionally assessed Bill of Entry were finalized by the Department ex-parte by making an endorsement thereon on a basis different from that claimed by Importer. Assessee has challenged the said assessment through Writ Petition before Hon'ble High Court on the ground of non speaking order. After considering all the facts, Hon'ble High Court has held that, while 18 Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 seeking permission for use of goods since substantial duty liability had already been recovered and relaxation sought of the bank guarantee furnished therefor. When sizeable sum had already been recovered, further condition of bank guarantee for use of software pending further investigation and possible adjudication not justified. Hence, assesse allowed to use such seized machinery alongwith the installed software for its manufacturing activity, subject to modified conditions. [2014(308)E.L.T.391(Guj.)] v any specific role during investigation on the part of the Assessee No. 4, hence penalty on Assessee No. 4 has been set aside. [2014(308)E.L.T.113(Tri.Mumbai)] Baggage - body of passenger cannot be said to be a baggage, hence, gold ornaments worn by the passenger not a baggage: Ornaments worn by the Foreign Tourist entering into India has been confiscated. Assessee has challenged the confiscation on the ground that when gold ornament was worn and not carried in its baggage, it was not required to be declared as body of passenger cannot be said to be baggage. Further, considering the stipulations in Section 77, 80 and 81 of Customs Act, 1962 held that same have no application when foreign tourist had on its body a gold chain which was worn and not concealed. Neither the Customs Act, 1962 nor the Baggage Rules, 1998 stipulate that a foreign tourist entering India cannot wear gold ornaments on its person. [2014(308) E.L.T.394(Ker.)] v Clarification issued by DGFT: There was classification dispute of items in ITC (HS) or HBPv1 or HBPv2 or schedule of DEPB rates. In this regard Hon'ble Bench held that, if any clarification/opinion issued by the DGFT then it will be binding on Customs. However, clarification issued by DGFT may not be binding on customs for classification of same goods under Customs Tariff Act, 1975 which is sole domain of customs authorities. [2014(308)E.L.T.418(Tri. Ahmd.)] v Penalty not imposable on employees when acting on directions of Superiors: Assessee has mis-declared export price with intent to avail higher DEPB benefit. Assessee No. 4 was working as Export Manager/Business Development Manager and only salaried employee of the Assessee No. 1 and 2. He was working as per the direction of the Assessee No. 1 and Assessee No. 2 and Bench did not find 19 v Rejection of refund as invoice for goods had been raised prior to clearance of goods: Department has rejected refund claim in respect of special additional duty of Customs paid on import of goods on the ground that invoice for goods had been raised prior to clearance of goods such that goods sold under invoice were not the same as goods imported. In this matter Hon'ble Bench held that in view of the registration certificate granted by the Delhi Pollution Control Committee for import of hazardous waste, assesse was required to clear imported waste directly to actual users from the port of import. Assessee raised invoice on 19.05.12, expecting clearance on that very day as duty was paid by it on 19.05.12, however, there was delay is passing out of charge order and same was given on 22.05.12. Merely because there was delay in passing out of charge order, the invoice raised on 19.05.12 cannot be said to be in respect of some other goods. [2014(308)E.L.T.186 (Tri.Del.)] v CESTAT denies concessional duty benefit on homeopathic medicines import due to nonfulfilment of condition of "credit nonavailment": CESTAT allows Revenue's appeal regarding homeopathic medicines imported into India not eligible for concessional rate of Additional Customs Duty (ACD) @ 1% under Notification No. 1/2011-CE. Exemption Notification must be construed strictly. Condition regarding CENVAT credit non-availment under said Notification not met as there is Settled principle that goods are exported, not taxes, and burden of proof that imported goods did not avail CENVAT remission in exporting country not discharged by assesse. Manufacture of like goods liable to excise duty in India, hence, levy of ACD @ 5% justified to counter-balance such excise duty.[TS-470-Tribunal-2014-CUST] v Cost reimbursement of Customs officers at Cargo Terminal not ultra vires Constitution / Customs Act: Bombay HC upholds constitutional validity of Regulation 5(2) of Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 of restricted goods either under Section 125 of Customs Act or under Section 11(9) of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, upon payment of fine in lieu of confiscation / redemption charges. Further, import of hazardous waste without Central Government permission deemed illegal under Hazardous Material Rules and such waste can be ordered to be re-exported. [TS-467-HC-2014(MAD)CUST] Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations 2009. Since custodianship transferred from Airport Authority of India and Air India Ltd. to assessee, it is obligated to bear charges of Customs staff posted at Cargo Terminal, on cost recovery basis, absent grant of specific exemption. None of the functions under Customs Act can be discharged / carried out, nor the power exercised in that behalf except by Customs officers, thus charges / expenses in relation thereto have to be paid and that is how Circulars, Guidelines and Regulations must be read and interpreted. Though, it is denied that cost is in nature of tax/fee, its recovery is supported assuming to be fee by correlating it with services provided by Customs officers. [TS-478-HC2014(BOM)-CUST] v v SERVICE TAX Erroneous finding or omission to consider contentions not render CESTAT's order 'nonspeaking': Hon'ble High Court dismisses assessee's appeals, an erroneous finding on merit by CESTAT or failure on its part to consider some contentions does not render its order 'a non-speaking' one. Assessee declared goods imported as ROM i.e. mixture of iron ore fines and lumps and later filed a refund claim seeking benefit of exemption available w.r.t. iron ore fines. Failure on part of CESTAT to consider fact that assessee paid duty under protest is an observation on merits of matter which does not enable this Court to entertain this appeal. Defect of this nature must be demonstrated to Court competent to entertain statutory appeal against it. However, an appeal before SC cannot be avoided, no conclusive finding recorded on issue of payment of duty absent existence of jurisdiction. [TS-471-HC-2014(BOM)-CUST] Permits provisional release of prohibited second hand machine, subject to eventual adjudication: HC allows assessee's writ, permits assessment and provisional release of second hand Digital Multifunction Print and Copying Machines, a prohibited item, subject to eventual adjudication. Prohibited goods can be imported subject to conditions, upon fulfillment of which, goods cease to be prohibited and automatically become non-prohibited goods. No bar on release 20 v Money remittance from overseas not 'service'; However, MTSO agents taxable as 'intermediaries: HC waives pre-deposit in relation to service tax leviability on 'lump sum lease premium' received by Maharashtra Govt undertaking u/s 65(105)(zzzz) as "renting of immovable property service". Tribunal cannot secure Revenue's interest especially when case prima facie in assessee's favour, in light of Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority ruling. Final view of Tribunal's Principal Bench is that service tax is applicable on quantum of rent paid monthly / yearly, not lease premium (a onetime lump sum payment. Reserving any opinion on correctness of the view in said ruling, HC sets aside Tribunal order directing deposit of Rs. 20 Cr out of total demand of Rs 136 Cr. [TS-479HC-2014(BOM)-ST] v Tax discharged by Division on parent company's behalf prima facie sustainable: Discharge of service tax for use of brand name under 'intellectual property service' category by a division on behalf of parent company prima facie allowable, since it is part and parcel of such parent entity. Revenue contention that tax liability ought to have been discharged by assessee and not its division unsustainable, absent any provision in law to support the proposition that division cannot discharge liability. Relies on coordinate bench ratio in Mahindra Logistics Ltd. that separate divisions of legal entity cannot be considered as separate legal entities and discharge of tax liability by head office sufficient. So long as division has received consideration from service recipient and discharged service tax Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 off under Rule 41D of Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959. Condition to Entry A-23 of Notification issued u/s 41 of Bombay Sales Tax Act extends exemption to sale of such goods subject to nonavailment of set-off. Goods either taxable or tax free, and taxable goods either chargeable to tax or exempt from tax. Since taxable goods include exempt goods and assessee did not claim any exemption from sales tax, said condition not imposable. [TS-474-HC-2014(BOM)-VAT] thereon, the same cannot be called wrong discharge of tax liability / mis-utilization of CENVAT Credit. [TS-480-Tribunal-2014-ST] v Supply of services to HAL taxable absent 'PSU' status; directs pre-deposit: Services rendered to Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL) taxable under Finance Act. HAL not a public sector undertaking (PSU) since it has been incorporated under Companies Act, 1956. Service tax applies on services rendered to any commercial undertaking, and HAL runs as a company having own balance sheet, profits. No provision in law grants exemption / exclusion from levy of tax in respect of Defence PSUs, hence assessee's attempt to escape liability on this ground unsustainable. [TS-472-Tribunal-2014ST] Miscellaneous v National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005 declared unconstitutional by Supreme Court: Section 5 of NTTA mandate that National Tax Tribunal would ordinarily have its sitting in National Capital Territory of Delhi. It was against mandate of law declared by Hon'ble Supreme Court in S. P. Sampath Kumar [1987(27)E.L.T.1(S.C.) and L. Chandra Kumar [1997(92)E.L.T.318(S.C)] that permanent Benches needed to be established at seat of every jurisdictional High Court, and if that was not possible, at least CIRCUIT Bench required to be established at every place where aggrieved party could avail of his remedy. Since Section 5, 6, 7, 8 and 13 of the said Act having been held illegal and unconstitutional, remaining provisions were rendered otiose and worthless and hence, entire NTTA declared to be unconstitutional. [2014(308)E.L.T.209(S.C.)] v Petition to CAT can be filed on the basis of communication received under RTI: Section 23 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 does not bar a challenge to the contents of a communication obtained under the Right to Information Act, 2005, it only bars the jurisdiction of Courts other than Administrative Tribunal in the matters which could be the subject matter of challenge in issuing the information under the Right to Information Act, 2005. Hence, communication received under RTI can be subject matter of proceedings under Section 10 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. Formal order is not required for the same. [2014(308)E.L.T.5(Bom.)] CST v v Interest chargeable from 'return date' on Form C non-production, not 'assessment' under CST Act: Hon'ble High Court quashes Tribunal order stating that interest is chargeable from the date of furnishing monthly returns in case of default in furnishing 'C' Form declarations claiming concessional rate under Central Sales Tax (CST) Act. Tribunal misread SC judgement in J. K. Synthetics wherein liability to pay tax and interest thereon was held to arise only after adjudication and not earlier to it. In instant case, assessee aware of liability on inter-state sale, hence tax paid pursuant to assessment order ought have been paid alongwith return, as prescribed under CST Act. Having failed to do so, State deprived of revenue and hence, interest payable from the date when assessee became liable to pay tax to compensate the delay. Also it rejects assessee's contention that no interest payable due to absent of provision in CST Act, on the ground that it very clear that power conferred to levy interest flows from statutory provision. [TS-499-HC-2014(KAR)-VAT] Disallowance of set-off on export unsustainable when sales tax exemption not claimed: Export sales of fountain pens and ball pens cannot be considered for disallowing set 21 Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 v Service Tax ST-3 Return filing due date extended to 14th November 2014 by CBEC. v Department has taken friendly move towards tax payers; Department has directed its officials to fix meetings with assesse in such manner so that they do not have to wait. v Out of Court settlement won't absolve financial fraudsters; such offences are crime against society , can lead to economic crisis. v Jurisdiction of Excise & Customs Officials re-notified after creation of new post of Principal Chief Commissioners and Principal Commissioner. v Kaushal Srivastava appointed as Chairman of CBEC. v Anita Kapur appointed as Chairperson of CBDT. v Hypothecation of machine does not change ownership of goods for cenvat credit. v Graft information can be sought from CBI under RTI. v Lucknow DRI seizes 55,000 kg Red Sanders worth Rs. 25 Cr. from export container lying at Tughlakabad ICD; Four persons arrested. v Trichy Airport Customs seizes gold bars worth Rs. 82 lakhs abandoned in gents' toilet. v Frustrated Central Excise Superintendents to demonstrate before residences of Top Bosses. v CIC issues showcause notice to Sonia Gandhi, Amit Shah in RTI case. v CBI arrests a Superintendent and Inspector, both of Central Excise in a bribery case. 22 Bizsol UPDATE v November - 2014 Who are you talking to? A man joined a big Multi National Company as a trainee. On his first day, he dialed the kitchen and shouted into the phone: "Get me a cup of coffee, quickly!" The voice from the other side responded: "You fool; you've dialled the wrong extension! Do you know who you're talking to? "No" replied the trainee. "It's the Senior Officer of the company, you idiot!" The trainee shouted back: "And do you know who YOU are talking to, you IDIOT?" "No!" replied the Senior Officer angrily. "Thank God!" replied the trainee and kept the phone down….. i i i i i v A young businessman had just started his own firm. He rented a beautiful office and had it furnished with antiques. Sitting there, he saw a man come into the outer office. Wishing to appear the hot shot, the businessman picked up the phone and started to pretend he had a big deal working. He threw huge figures around and made giant commitments. Finally he hung up and asked the visitor, "Can I help you?" The man said, "Yeah, I've come to activate your phone lines." 23 Bizsol UPDATE November - 2014 NOTES 24
© Copyright 2024