1 Hjertesviktforum 2015 Langtidseffekter av trening etter hjertetransplantasjon PhD-stipendiat/ lege Marianne Yardley Veileidere: Professor Dr. med Lars Gullestad, Post doc Kari Nytrøen. Hjertesviktforum 2015 3 Disposisjon • Hjerte/karsykdom- Status i dag • Tiden etter treningsintervensjon- nytter det? • Kronotrop insuffisiens og intervalltrening • Oksygenopptak som en prediktor for langtidsoverlevelse etter hjertetransplantasjon • Overlevelsesstatistikk- Resultater fra Norge Marianne Yardley Marianne Yardley Status 2015 • Dødelighet av hjerte/kar sykdom er stadig synkende • Økende andel hjertesvikt pasienter • Forebygging og behandling er fremdeles viktig! Marianne Yardley 6 Marianne Yardley 7 Marianne Yardley 8 Tiden etter treningsintervensjon Marianne Yardley 9 Langtidsoppfølging • 2 Meta analyser – tiden etter hjertesviktrehabilitering • Minimalt som er gjort etter høy intensitetstrening (HIT) • 41 HTx pasienter har vært til 5 års follow- up etter HIT – TEX studien (Kari Nytrøen) Marianne Yardley 10 Mueller L, Myers J, Kottman W, Oswald U, Boesch C, Arbrol N, et al. Exercise capacity, physical activity patterns and outcomes six years after cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure. Clinical rehabilitation. 2007;21(10):923-31 9p. Vo2 mL/kg/min Exercise group Control group Baseline Post training Follow up Baseline Post training Follow up 22.0±3.4 26.7*±4.3 19.9±2.7 20.9±2.9 20.3±4.5 * P verdi < 0.05 Marianne Yardley 23.6±5.8 11 Piepoli MF, Davos C, Francis DP, Coats AJ. Exercise training meta-analysis of trials in patients with chronic heart failure (ExTraMATCH). BMJ. 2004;328(7433):189. Marianne Yardley 12 Sagar VA, Davies EJ, Briscoe S, Coats AJS, Dalal HM, Lough F, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart. 2015;2(1). • Lavere andel re- innleggelser • Bedre selvrapportert livskvalitet • Lenger langtidsoverlevelse Marianne Yardley 13 Re- innleggelser Marianne Yardley Sagar VA, Davies EJ, Briscoe S, Coats AJS, Dalal HM, Lough F, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart. 2015;2(1). 14 Moholdt T, Aamot IL, Granoien I, Gjerde L, Myklebust G, Walderhaug L, et al. Long-term follow-up after cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized study of usual care exercise training versus aerobic interval training after myocardial infarction. International journal of cardiology. 2011;152(3):388-90. Marianne Yardley 15 Tilbakemeldinger- TEX 5 år • Bidra til ny kunnskap • Gøy • Kjempetøft • ”Kjøpte meg tredemølle” • Mulig å delta på gruppe rehabilitering med HIT Marianne Yardley 16 …..hva med den trege pulsen og HIT?? Marianne Yardley 17 Marianne Yardley 18 Marianne Yardley 19 Marianne Yardley 20 Oksygenopptak og selvrapportert fysisk helse som prediktorer for langtidsoverlevelse etter hjertetransplantasjon [email protected] 21 Hva påvirker langtidsoverlevelse etter HTx? •Årsak til hjertesvikt •Donors alder •Mottakers alder •Iskemitid •Utvikling av vaskulopati i koronarkar (CAV/ graftsklerose) •Mekanisk støtte på venteliste •VO2peak?? Marianne Yardley Survival curves for cardiac deaths, based on VO2peak at referral. Terence Kavanagh et al. Circulation. 2002;106:666-671 Marianne Yardley Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. 23 Keteyian SJ, Brawner CA, Savage PD, Ehrman JK, Schairer J, Divine G, et al. Peak aerobic capacity predicts prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease. American heart journal. 2008;156(2):292-300. Marianne Yardley 24 VO2peak som prognostisk faktor • Kodama S, Saito K, Tanaka S, Maki M, Yachi Y, Asumi M, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women: a meta-analysis. Jama. 2009:301:2024-35. • Cahalin LP, Chase P, Arena R, Myers J, Bensimhon D, Peberdy MA, et al. A meta-analysis of the prognostic significance of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with heart failure. Heart failure reviews. 2013:18:79-94. • Costanzo MR, Augustine S, Bourge R, Bristow M, O'Connell JB, Driscoll D, et al. Selection and treatment of candidates for heart transplantation. Circulation. 1995:92:3593-612. Marianne Yardley 25 Overlevelses statistikk – 2 HTx populasjoner • CPET kohort – Lars Gullestad et al. – 178 pasienter fullført VO2peak test (1990-2003) – Gjennomsnitt observasjonstid: 11 år – Events: 128 • SF-36 kohort – Odd E Havik et al. (1998-2000) – 133 pas fullført spørreskjema om livskvalitet – Gjennomsnitt observasjonstid 10 år – Events: 87 Marianne Yardley 26 SF- 36 spørreskjema • Mål på selvrapportert livskvalitet – fysisk og mental helse • SF-36 score korrelerer med O2 opptak • Inaktivitet er estimert til å forklare 9% av tidlig død på verdensbasis Lee et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 2012 • Sammenheng mellom selvrapportert fysisk helse og prognose – HUNT undersøkelsen – Oslo undersøkelsen Marianne Yardley 27 Marianne Yardley 28 Resultater Marianne Yardley 29 CPET kohort- Karakteristika overlevende / døde Variable Survivors Non- survivors n= 42 Mean± SD, Median [Q1,Q3] n=128 Mean± SD, Median[Q1,Q3] P-value HR [95% CI] Gender (% men) 86% 89% 0.559 1.181 [0.678-2.059] 0.557 Age at CPET (years) Weight (kg) 45 [36, 56] 56 [51, 56] <0.001 1.051 [1.031-1.072] <0.001 77± 11 82± 13 0.032 1.014 [1.000-1.028] 0.042 Donor age (years) 28± 9 29± 11 0.752 1.001 [0.983-1.020] 0.892 Ischemic time (min) Etiology of heart failure 107± 70 127± 66 0.103 1.002 [0.999-1.005] 0.205 Other 9% CMP 60% CAD 31% Other 6% CMP 32% CAD 62% 0.002 ref 0.001 0.953 [0.427-2.129] 0.907 1.939 [0.892-4.213] 0.094 Smoking (% yes) 24% 41% 0.064 1.435 [0.998-2.065] 0.051 Marianne Yardley Compare Univariate cox- regression groups n=170 n=178 P-value Variable n= 42 8% Non- survivors Compare Univariate cox- regression groups n=128 n=170 n=178 35% 0.001 2.415 [1.620-3.599] <0.001 2 [1, 6] 3 [1, 6] 0.274 1.040 [0.993-1.016] 0.177 Ejection fraction (%) 78 [72, 82] 74 [69, 83] 0.870 1.004 [0.993-1.016] 0.487 Cardiac Index 2.6± 0.6 0.609 1.039 [0.751-1.438] 0.817 Hemoglobine (g/Dl) 13.4± 1.4 12.9± 1.5 0.133 0.925 [0.808-1.058] 0.253 Creatinine (µmol/L) 111± 30 126± 33 0.011 1.008 [1.003-1.013] 0.003 Cya dosage (mg) 250 [200, 300] 225 [195, 275] 0.177 0.998 [0.996-1.001] 0.141 Prednisolone dosage (mg) 7.5 [7.5, 7.5] CAV after HTx (% yes) Years since HTx at inclusion Survivors 2.6± 0.7 Imurel dosage (mg) 95± 51 Marianne Yardley 7.5 [7.5, 7.5] 0.398 1.028 [0.885-1.194] 0.720 110± 50 0.106 1.002 [0.998-1.006] 0.264 31 Exercise variables Survivors n= 42 1.77± 0.52 Non- survivors Compare groups n=128 n=170 0.001 1.50± 0.44 VO2peak (mL/kg/min) VO2peak <mediana (%) 23.08± 6.05 18.20± 4.58 <0.001 0.901 [0.866-0.937] <0.001 44% 56% 0.006 1.848 [1.296-2.633] 0.001 VO2peak (% )b 58.9± 13.4 52.5± 11.5 0.003 0.974 [0.960-0.989] 0.001 Heart rate max 147± 26 146± 20 0.853 0.997 [0.990-1.005] 0.473 RER 1.21± 0.14 1.19± 0.12 0.277 0.416 [0.099-1.758] 0.233 SBP rest (mmHg) 127± 21 135± 20 0.028 1.007 [0.999-1.016] 0.096 SBP max (mmHg) 183± 26 193± 31 0.089 1.004 [0.997-1.011] 0.230 V max (L) 71± 22 64± 19 0.053 0.988 [0.980-0.997] 0.010 Watt max 159± 46 131± 39 <0.001 0.990 [0.986-0.995] <0.001 VO2peak (L/min) a Median value = 19,6 b Age predicted values for VO2peak, based on reference values presented by Åstrand et al. Marianne Yardley Univariate coxP-value regression n=178 0.449 [0.298-0.676] <0.001 32 SF-36 kohort: Karakteristika overlevende / døde Variable Survivors Nonsurvivors n=46 Gender (% men) Age at time of SF- 36 (years) Weight (kg) Body mass index (kg/m2) Donor age(years) Ischemic time (min) Etiology of heart failure Compare groups n=133 Univariate cox- regression P- value HR [95% CI] P-value 0.643 <0.001 1.085 [0.631-1.867] 1.076 [1.048-1.105] 0.768 <0.001 n=133 Mean± SD Median [Q1,Q3] 78% 46 ±13 n=87 Mean± SD Median [Q1,Q3] 82% 59 ±7 78± 13 25± 3 86± 14 27± 4 0.009 0.003 1.020 [1.005-1.035] 1.071[1.023-1.122] 0.011 0.004 30± 10 114± 65 31± 13 141 ±72 0.859 0.031 1.001 [0.982-1.020] 1.003 [1.000-1.006] 0.948 0.053 Other 14% CMP 62% CAD 24% Other 29% CMP 7% CAD 64% <0.001 ref 1.051 [0.431-2.563] 2.494 [1.070-5.813] 0.001 0.913 0.034 Marianne Yardley 33 Variable Survivors Compare groups n=133 0.141 Univariate cox- regression n=46 15% Nonsurvivors n=87 26% Smoking (% yes) 9% 32% 0.003 2.721 [1.721-4.304] <0.001 Years since HTx (at 3 [2, 6] inclusion) 6 [3, 9] 0.003 1.086 [1.034-1.141] 0.001 Hemoglobine (g/Dl) 13.6± 1.2 13.4± 1.4 0.522 0.982 [0.836-1.154] 0.824 Creatinine (µmol /L) 107± 27 124± 66 0.038 1.003 [1.000-1.006] 0.028 Cardiac Index Cya dosage (mg) Prednisolone dosage (mg) 2.7± 0.6 231± 75 7.3± 1.2 2.6± 0.5 196± 49 7.4± 1.2 0.291 0.006 0.629 0.726 [0.431-1.224] 0.229 0.994 [0.990-0.998] 0.003 1.055 [0.883- 1.260] 0.555 Imurel dosage (mg) 92± 45 99± 50 0.434 1.002 [0.998-1.007] CAV after HTx (% yes) Marianne Yardley n=133 1.560 [0.968- 2.514] 0.068 0.317 34 Variable Compare groups n=133 Univariate coxregression n=133 P-value n=46 Nonsurvivors n=87 5 [2, 7] 6 [4, 11] 0.011 1.029[1.002- 1.057] 0.033 95 [89, 96] 80 [60, 94] <0.001 0.977 [0.969- 0.985] <0.001 PF-score <median 37% (%)a 63% <0.001 2.604 [1.677- 4.044] <0.001 Role Physical (RP) Bodily pain (BP) General health (GH) Mental health (MH) Vitality (VT) Social functioning (SF) 100 [75, 100] 84 [62, 100] 77 [61, 92] 50 [0,94] 72 [41, 84] 62 [45, 82] 0.003 0.013 0.006 0.991 [0.986- 0.996] 0.989 [0.982- 0.997] 0.985 [0.976-0.995] 0.001 0.004 0.002 88 [76, 94] 82 [68, 92] 0.300 0.996 [0.984-1.008] 0.476 70 [55, 80] 88 [67, 89] 60 [40, 75] 78 [56, 89] 0.003 0.087 0.987 [0.978-0.997] 0.992 [0.983- 1.001] 0.008 0.088 Role Emotional (RE) 100 [67, 100] 67 [33, 100] 0.001 0.990 [0.984-0.996] 0.001 BDI score SF- 36 variables; Physical functioning (PF) Survivors Marianne Yardley 35 Forklaringsmodell med VO2peak og PF-score •Andre variabler som forklarer overlevelse ytterligere •Vurdert potensielle confoundere – Påvirker både VO2peak/PF-score og overlevelse – tommelfingel regel- endrer estimatet med 10 % Marianne Yardley 36 CPET kohort; multippel cox regresjon Variables HR [95% CI] P- value VO2peak 0.917 [0.876-0.960] <0.001 Age at CPET 1.045 [1.020-1.070] <0.001 CAV 1.968 [1.314- 2.948] 0.001 SF-36 kohort; multippel cox regresjon Variables HR [95% CI] P- value Physical Functioning 0.983 [0.975-0.992] <0.001 Age 1.077 [1.046-1.108] <0.001 Smoking 1.878 [1.123-3.141] 0.016 CAV 1.674 [1.025-2.732] 0.039 Marianne Yardley 37 Overlevelseskurver Marianne Yardley 38 Overlevelse • Median overlevelse Norge: 12 år • CPET kohort – 12 år – VO2peak under median: 9 (7, 11) – VO2peak over median: 16 (14, 18) • SF-36 kohort – 10 år – PF score under median: 8 (6, 10) – PF score over median: 12 (10, 13) Marianne Yardley 39 Overlevelseskurver •VO2peak og selvrapportert fysisk helse utpeker seg som viktige prediktorer på langtidsoverlevelse. •Fysisk kapasitet bør måles oftere, også etter hjertetransplantasjon. Marianne Yardley
© Copyright 2024