TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2014 ANALYSIS THE LEADING INDEPENDENT DAILY IN THE ARABIAN GULF ESTABLISHED 1961 Founder and Publisher YOUSUF S. AL-ALYAN Editor-in-Chief ABD AL-RAHMAN AL-ALYAN EDITORIAL : 24833199-24833358-24833432 ADVERTISING : 24835616/7 FAX : 24835620/1 CIRCULATION : 24833199 Extn. 163 ACCOUNTS : 24835619 COMMERCIAL : 24835618 P.O.Box 1301 Safat,13014 Kuwait. E MAIL :[email protected] Website: www.kuwaittimes.net Focus Spending bill a triumph of divided govt By David Espo A fter drawing opposition from both ends of the political spectrum, the $1.1 trillion spending bill cleared for President Barack Obama’s signature stands as a triumph of divided government. It’s the first of its kind for a while, and may also be the last. “Remember this bill was put together in a bicameral, bipartisan way,” House Speaker John Boehner said. Large numbers of lawmakers on both sides of the political divide would rather forget parts of the bill, as evidenced by relatively close votes, 219-206 in the House and 56-40 in the Senate. The legislation quietly locks in billions of dollars in spending cuts that the tea party-strengthened Republicans extracted from Democrats in recent years in a tumultuous string of battles. Equally without much fuss, it reduces staffing at the agency the GOP dislikes the most, the Environmental Protection Agency, to levels last seen in 1989. Yet it maintains funding for President Barack Obama’s health care program that Republicans loathe so heartily that they shut down the government last year rather than spend any money on it. And it provides additional money for health research that Democrats favor, and most of what the administration sought to combat Ebola. It is stocked with provisions to prevent the use of federal funds to pay for abortions, and with another to block the government from giving endangered species list protection to the sage grouse. More points on the Republican side of the ledger. But it doesn’t tamper with the administration’s proposed greenhouse gas regulation, or allow guns on Army Corps of Engineers land, changes that conservatives favored. Modest victories for the Democrats. Obama echoed Boehner’s assessment on Friday as he urged the Senate to approve the legislation one day after he had been publicly chastised by Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the leader of his own party in the House. “This is what’s produced when you have the divided government that the American people voted for,” he said. “I think what the American people very much are looking for is some practical governance and the willingness to compromise and that’s what this bill reflects.” Except that political leaders in both parties tend to preach bipartisanship far more than they voluntarily practice it. And possible presidential contenders on the verge of a campaign practice it even less often. That explains Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, who emerged as the Senate’s most aggressive foe of the bill. He’ll need support from tea party-aligned voters in primaries if he runs, not middle-of-the-roaders eager for compromise. In fact, House Republicans in general weren’t exactly thrilled with the bill, which made no attempt to challenge Obama’s immigration policy. And within moments of its passage, Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the third-ranking GOP leader, made it sound like the entire 1,764-page measure was merely the price Republicans had to pay to resume legislative hostilities with the president in the new year. “That battle begins in just four weeks when we get the reinforcements of a Republican Senate in January,” he said, echoing promises made by Sen. Mitch McConnell and other GOP leaders on the other side of the Capitol. A few weeks after that, money runs out for the Homeland Security Department. By Republican reckoning, that’s when they will have leverage to force Obama to roll back a policy that envisions work visas for 5 million immigrants living in the country illegally. Then, unlike now, there will be no threat of a government-wide shutdown looming in the background. Republicans weren’t the only ones who said they were looking ahead. Pelosi called the legislation a Republican attempt at “blackmail,” citing a provision that rolls back a regulation imposed on banks after the economic calamity of 2008. Next, she publicly reprimanded Obama for embracing it. Fifty-seven Democrats voted for it regardless, exposing deep divisions inside the party that were also echoed in the Senate. Pelosi claimed victory anyway. “We strengthened our position to achieve common sense solutions” in the new Congress that convenes in January,” she wrote to her members. “We hope to do so in a bipartisan way, but stand ready to sustain the president’s veto when necessary,” she added pointedly. Obama made no mention of vetoes in his own remarks a day later. He said if he’d been able to write the spending measure, “I suspect it’d be slightly different,” but Americans want to see willingness to compromise. So said the president whose party lost the midterm elections. The winning Republicans aren’t likely to see things quite that way. They intend to challenge Obama’s policies on immigration, health care and the environment, and probably will produce a 10-year balanced budget plan that Democrats will not abide. —AP All articles appearing on these pages are the personal opinion of the writers. Kuwait Times takes no responsibility for views expressed therein. Kuwait Times invites readers to voice their opinions. Please send submissions via email to: [email protected] or via snail mail to PO Box 1301 Safat, Kuwait. The editor reserves the right to edit any submission as necessary. Sydney siege: The danger of ‘lone wolf’ attacks By Madeleine Coorey A ustralia’s dramatic siege in which a gunman displayed an Islamic flag follows months of warnings about “lone wolf ” attacks, and experts said authorities must think harder about how to tackle the problem. Heavily-armed police surrounded the Lindt chocolate cafe in Sydney’s financial heart yesterday as an unknown number of people remained inside hours after being taken hostage. The incident comes against a backdrop of warnings from the government about radicalized Muslims, potentially attracted to the conflicts in Iraq and Syria and sympathizing with the Islamic State group. Australia upgraded its security alert in September in the face of extremist threats, ramping up an anti-terror crackdown after foiling a plot by Islamic State jihadists to carry out “demonstration executions” in the country. “I am deeply concerned about the threat that lone wolf terrorism poses to people,” Prime Minister Tony Abbott said in September. Anne Aly, an associate professor specializing in counter-terrorism at Curtin University in Western Australia, said radicalization in Australia had been a gradual process over the last five years but had become more noticeable since the rise of IS. “The jihadist narrative is one that has personally resonated with the everyday lives of some young people in Australia,” she said. “If you look at that narrative, it is all about victimhood, persecution and Muslims under attack.” The black flag shown at a window in the Lindt cafe was one commonly used by jihadist groups bearing the shahada, or profession of faith in Islam. Australia has committed some 600 troops and several aircraft to Iraq and Abbott has repeatedly called the Islamic State group an “apocalyptic death cult”. Aly said there was a growing right-wing, nationalistic movement in Australia which made some Muslims feel like outsiders. “They feel there is some truth to Muslims being under attack. And maybe because they feel are so far away, they feel they need to get out and do something.” Concerns of violence Counter-terror expert at Charles Sturt University, associate professor Nick O’Brien, said any connection to the IS group (also known as ISIS) in the Sydney siege would not come as a surprise. “Once we have a situation when we have Australians being recruited and travelling to the Middle East to fight for ISIS, inevitably something is going to happen here and unfortunately it looks like it has,” he said. Canberra has passed a law criminalizing travel to terror hotspots and cancelled the passports of 70-plus people to prevent them heading to fight alongside jihadists, amid concerns they could return home and commit violence. Australian National University visiting professor Clive Williams said Australia had attracted attention by committing troops to operations in Iraq, but had not so much to fear from fighters returning from Syria radicalized. “It’s the ones who want to go over there and can’t go,” he said, adding the siege was probably the work of a “lone wolf”. “We need to think about that a bit more strategically. It needs to be a bit more sophisticated than taking away their passport.” Adam Dolnik, professor of terrorism studies at Wollongong University, said it was possible that the perpetrator was sympathetic to the Islamic State group. “The other possibility is we are dealing with a psychopathology in need of a cause,” he said, adding that the gunman may have little religion or ideology. However, he said there would be an association with Islam in most people’s minds. “Of course, that can be very damaging,” he said. The grand mufti of Australia Ibrahim Abu Mohamed said in a statement with other Muslim leaders that the community was “devastated” by the turn of events and condemned “this criminal act unequivocally”. “Any such despicable act only serves to play into the agendas of those who seek to destroy the goodwill of the people of Australia and to further damage and ridicule the religion of Islam and Australian Muslims throughout this country,” they said. —AFP Mideast peace push puts US in tough spot By Bradley Klapper T he Obama administration is in a diplomatic bind on the Mideast as US Secretary of State John Kerr y meets with top Israeli and Palestinian officials in Europe this week. The US is reluctant to do anything right now that can be perceived as interference in Israel’s election while being pressed by close allies to endorse an IsraeliPalestinian negotiating framework that largely adheres to US policy. France is drafting a UN resolution that proposes a two-year timetable for talks. The draft speaks of the 1967 Mideast borders as the basis for dividing the land, which President Barack Obama has publicly backed, but it doesn’t include key Israeli - and US conditions such as Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state. The United States has long opposed the idea of the UN Security Council imposing a framework for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. But for Washington, simply vetoing the plan could have pitfalls. A veto would upset Palestinians and perhaps some Arab allies frustrated by years of diplomatic gridlock. Several are fighting alongside the US right now against the Islamic State group. A veto would also risk angering France as well as other European countries that want to broaden peace efforts after countless US-led mediation failures. America’s credibility as a peace broker could be damaged as a result. At a White House meeting last week, Obama’s top foreign policy aides were unable to agree on an approach to France’s potential resolution. Kerry suggested steering away from the effort at a time of increased Mideast violence and with the Israeli election a couple of months away, according to a US official familiar with the discussion. Compromise Susan Rice, Obama’s national security adviser, supported engaging allies to see if a compromise is possible, said the official, who wasn’t authorized to speak publicly on the matter. For now, the administration is trying to get an idea of what key countries are hoping to accomplish or avoid. Kerry was to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Rome yesterday, followed by the foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany in Paris. The discussions continue today in London with top Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat and the head of the Arab League. “Time after time, we have repulsed efforts to dictate conditions which have damaged the security of Israel and which do not comply with real peace,” Netanyahu said as he left for Rome. He said this effort would be the same. “ We will rebuff any attempt that would put this terrorism inside our home, inside the state of Israel.” Kerry discussed the escalating tensions in the Middle East on Sunday with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who told reporters in Italy’s capital that it was “crucial ... we don’t allow the situation to degrade further.” Support within Europe for France’s proposal is unclear. French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius was making his case to EU foreign ministers in Brussels before his meeting with Kerry. French officials believe the US opposes the draft right now, but they say they would consider making changes. France’s diplomatic push was prompted by a Jordanian resolution, on behalf of the Palestinians, last month that the US finds much more objectionable. That proposal demands a full Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank within two years and full recognition of Palestine as a state, with no talk of land swaps or security measures. The resolution appears to have stalled. If it were to move to a vote, Washington would almost surely veto it. —AP ROME: US Secretary of State John Kerry talks before meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov at Villa Taverna on Sunday in Rome. —AP
© Copyright 2024