THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS 345 E. 47th St., New York, N.Y. 10017 97-GT-276 The Society shall not be responsible for statements or opinions advanced in papers or dieitission at meetings of the Society or al its Divisions or Sections, or printed In its publications. Discussion is primed only if the paper is published in an ASME Journal. Authorization to photocopy material for internal or 'personal use under circumstance not falling within the fair use.provisions of the Copyright Act is granted by ASME to libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Service provided that the base fee of $0.30 per page is paid directly to the CCC. 27 Congress Street Salem MA 01970. Requests for special permission or bulk reproduction should be addressed to the ASME-Technical Relishing Department Copyright 0 1997 by ASME . Printed in U.S.A All Rights Reserved EFFECT OF SWIRL ON COMBUSTION CHARACTERISTICS IN PREMIXED FLAMES S. GI, A. K. Gupta and M.J. Lewis University of Maryland The Combustion Laboratory Department of Mechanical Engineering College Park, MD 20742 ABSTRACT A double concentric premixed swirl burner is used to examine the structure of two different methane-air prernixed flames. Direct flame photography together with local temperature data provides an opportunity to investigate the effects of swirl number distribution in each annulus on the global and local flame structure, flame stability and local distribution of thermal signatures. An R-type thermocouple compensated for high-frequency response is used to measure the local distribution of thermal signatures in two different flames, each of which represents a different combination of swirl number in the swirl burner. In order to improve the accuracy of the temperature data at high-frequency conditions, information on the thermocouple time constant are also obtained under prevailing conditions of local temperature and velocity by compensating the heat loss from the thermocouple sensor bead. These results assist in quantifying the degree of thermal nonunifonnities in the flame signatures as affected by the distribution of swirl and to develop strategies for achieving uniform distribution of temperatures in flames. INTRODUCTION Swirl flows have been widely investigated for several decades because of their extensive use in all kinds of practical systems, including gas turbine combustion. Numerous experiments in swirl flows have been carried out extending from very fundamental isothermal flows as well as reacting flows to those formed in very complex swirl combustor geometries. Experimental results have established the general characteristics of swirl flows and revealed important effects of swirl on promoting flame stability, increasing combustion efficiency and controlling emission of pollutants from combustion'. Leuckel and Fricke? conducted a variety of measurements using a nonpremixed single swirl burner consisting of an annular swirling air jet and a centrally located non-swirling fuel jet. Chen and Driscoll 3 have provided an understanding of the physical processes that occur within the nonpremixed flames by examining the enhanced mixing characteristics in swirl flows III I II I 11111,1111 II III III resulting from the formation of a central toroidal recirculation zone. A thermal-inertia compensated thermocouple technique which produces a linear response of the thermocouple at higher frequencies was used by Gupta et al. ° to investigate turbulent temperature characteristics of swirling nonpremixed flames. By achieving a linear response of the thermocouple to higher frequencies, important information on the structure of turbulent flames can be obtained which could not be ordinarily observed. Accurate measurements of the rms temperature fluctuations are possible when the output of the thermocouple is compensated to higher frequencies °. Although the frequency compensation can be carried out to several Itliz there are practical limitations, e.g., electronic noise, associated with the thermocouple compensation technique. Most previous studies have been conducted on single swirl burners instead of the double concentric swirl burners which are playing an ever-increasing role in practical combustor desigh. The double concentric burner allows for variation of the radial distribution swirl via control over the axial and angular momentum of the jets in the two annuli of the burner. As such, at a fixed overall swirl number, the detailed flow distribution can be significantly different under various operational conditions of the burner. By introducing the swirling flow through concentric annuli, it is possible to control the radial distribution of flow and swirl for achieving significantly different flame stability limits, levels of turbulence, volumetric heat release rates and combustion characteristics in general. Significantly different combustion and emission characteristics have been obtained by altering the relative proportions of the swirling flow in various annuli'. Marshall and Gupta 6 investigated thermal characteristics of diffusion flames obtained through various combinations of swirl and axial inlet momentum distributions in . a double concentric swirl burner. Fluctuating temperature measurements were obtained in the flames, including the recirculation zone, and shear layer and post-combustion regions. By maintaining a constant equivalence ratio, a companion of the magnitude and distributions of temperatures for different flames were obtained. These results provided the important role of radial Presented at the International Gas Turbine & Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition Orlando, Florida — June 2–June 5, 1997 This paper has been accepted for publication in the Transactions of the ASME Discussion of it will be accepted at ASME Headquarters until September 50, 1997 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 12/29/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms distribution of swirl and jet axial momentum on the flame thermal characteristics. The use of lean premixed combustion in gas turbine combustors has been preferred over nonpremixed combustion by the gas turbine manufacturers for achieving low NO emission. Although the use of lean premixed combustion is attractive for pollution reduction, it may provide a penalty in system complexity, acoustic instabilities, increased size and weight. Though disadvantages may prohibit the use of lean premixed combustion in certain applications, it still offers advantages over the other types of combustors used in gas turbine applications. The use of lean premixed combustion reduces the peak flame temperatures obtained near the fuel-air interface in the traditional diffusion flame type of combustors. The degree of premixing determines the thermal field uniformity of the flame. In all premixed combustor configurations the fuel-air mixture is premixed upstream of the swirler, which is used for the stabilization of the flame at all power conditions. The use of swirl assists in the stabilization of the flame by transporting hot and chemically active species from the downstream region of the flame to the root of the flame, which therefore alters the transport of gases within the combustor and creates a thermal nonunifomilty. The extent of thermal non-uniformity in premixed flames is not known and can be expected to depend upon the combustor configuration, the degree and distribution of swirl in the combustor, and other input and operational parameters of the combustor. The nonuniformity in the thermal field can in turn have an influence on the performance of the combustor in addition to the emission levels, including NOR. In order to examine the effect of fuel-air premixing on the resulting thermal field, an experimental premixed swirl burner facility was developed. The facility is very similar to the one described in ref. 6 except for the well-mixed fuel-air mixture in each annuli, including the central pipe, and the presence of a flame quench trap upstream of the swirler in each annuli. Results obtained on the mean and fluctuating temperature measurements are aimed at providing the effect of swirl on the thermal characteristics of premixed co-swirling flames. Bow En Reg nwras Ea ein Figure 1 A Schematic of the Premixed Swirl Burner flow and the surrounding outer annulus 1 nozzle flows. The two swirlers generate the tangential momentum to form a central toroidal recirculation zone for flame stabilization. Each swirler consists of eighteen straight vanes fixed in place by thin inner and outer rings. The inside and outside swirlers can be fixed independently, and this allows the variation of the radial distribution of swirl combination in the burner. The facility therefore permits examination of the flames formed with strong swirl in the central region and weak swirl on the outside, or vice versa. It is also possible to form flames having coand/or counter-swirl in the annuli. In the present study only the co-swirling flames are examined, with varying radial distribution of swirl in the burner for a fixed stoichiometry of 0.625 in each annuli. A 2-D traverse assembly is used to move the thermocouple with respect to the fixed burner with a spatial accuracy of 0.001 inch. The test section is situated above the burner and is formed from an open-ended cube enclosure around the burner exit. This arrangement provides isolation of the flame from external ambient disturbances. The flow control system for the burner consists of a series of rotameters, pressure gauges and control valves to measure and regulate the air and methane flow rates prior to their entry into the premixer and subsequently into the two annuli and the central nozzle of the burner. EXPERIMENT FACILITY A schematic diagram of the experimental burner is given in Figure 1. The has a double concentric swirl burner in which the radial distribution of swirl and momentum distribution of the flow in the two annuli and the central pipe can be independently controlled. The facility consists of a bumer, a test section, a flow control system and a 2-d traverse mechanism. The premixed burner is similar to the diffusion flame burner facility discussed in ref. 6 except that it has the necessary flame arrestor in each annuli, which is used to prevent flashback, and can mix the reactants well prior to their arrival over the swirler. At the top of the burner is the flame stabilization section, which includes two glass tubes for the two nozzles in the burner (having inner diameters of 65 mm and 35 mm), a centrally located premixed fuel-air nozzle, and two swirlers for the annulus 1 and annulus 2 jets. The swirl strength in the central nozzle and annulus 1 and 2 can be changed to any desired value. A backward facing step is placed inside the central nozzle in order to make the methane-air mixture completely turbulent. The divergence in this central nozzle permits smooth interaction between the central EXPERIMENTAL CONDMONS AND DIAGNOSTICS Four premixed flames have been examined here. These flames were produced with changes in swirl strength distribution between the two annuli. Previous work has presented results designated flames 1 and 2.7 For the flame 3 the swirl vane angle was 30 ° and 55* in annulus 1 and 2, respectively. However, for flame 4 the swirl vane angle was 45 ° and 55° in annulus 1 and 2, respectively. The experimental conditions for the examined flames are given in Table 1. 2 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 12/29/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms Ii Table 1 Experimental Test Matrix Central Pipe Annulus I Annulus 2 Axial Momentum Distribution Flame 4 Flame 3 I M„ = 300 Ibm ft/min 2 M., = 1500 Him ft/min2 KM = 2163 Ibm ftlrnin 2 Swirl Vane Angles Flame 4 I No Swirl 45' 30' I Flame 3 55' AT, has decreased by a factor of 1/e. High frequency temperature measurements have been taken with an R type micro-thermocouple probe. The probe utilizes a Pt/Pt-13% Rh thermocouple with a wire diameter of 50mm. This wire diameter is small enough not to cause any significant intrusion in the flame while maintaining structural rigidity of the thermocouple. No measurable disturbance to the flame was observed when the thermocouple was inserted in the flame. The signal of the thermocouple is amplified and digitized at 10 kHz for a total of 300,000 samples at every probe location in the flame. The thermocouple output is compensated to high frequencies so that high sampling frequency provides resolution to the small time scale turbulence that may occur in flames. The large number of samples provides the flow thermal statistics. The resulting long sampling time of 30 seconds allows for avenging over the low frequency temperature fluctuations and ensures good statistical information of the thermal field. The mean value at a location is the arithmetic mean temperature of the samples. Measurements are taken at different points in the flame region by moving the thermocouple with respect to the burner. Great care was taken to obtain a symmetrical flame with respect to the burner vertical axis. Subsequent measurements carried out on the flames validated their axisymmetric behavior. Half plane measurements were then sufficient to characterize the complete flame because of the observed axisymmetry. The half plane consists of 12 radial positions at 9 axial elevations for a total of 108 probing locations. The horizontal spacing of the grid is 0.25 inches while that for the vertical is 0.75 inches. It is situated directly above the burner orifice with the location of the home coordinates in the center of the burner exit plane. The response time of the thermocouple probe is insufficient to accurately resolve temperature fluctuations faster than about 50 Hz even with the very small thermocouple bead formed with 501an diameter wires, though temperature fluctuations up to several kHz can occur in a strongly swirling flames.' Therefore, the time constants were measured to compensate the raw temperature data for thermal inertia effects of the utilized thermocouple. In order to determine the time constant of the thermocouple, the wire is heated by a DC power supply and cooled down in the flame periodically. In this manner, a series of heating and cooling pulses are obtained and the value of the time constant, 1, is calculated from the resulting decay times of the thermocouple signature. In each flame, the time constant is measured at 30 locations (at every other measurement point in both the axial and radial direction). Due to the fluctuation of temperatures in the flame, the process is repeated up to 300 times at each measurement location. The resulting temperature decay curves are averaged to produce a smooth decay curve from which the time constant, T. is determined as the value at which the overheat RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The test conditions are given in Table I. Global flame features are described first, followed by the quantitative data on mean and fluctuating temperatures, probability density distribution of temperatures, power spectra, and integral- and micro-scale of temperature time scales. Flame Photographs Figure 2 shows a direct comparison of flame 3 and flame 4. It is interesting IA note from the direct flame photographs that the flame length is longer for flame 4 ( with 45' swirl in annulus 1) than flame 3 (with 30' swirl) while the other flow conditions are kept constant. It is generally believed that the swirl number has an important effect in characterizing the combustion process and that increased swirl number produces enhanced tangential momentum, which provides a better mixing between the incoming hot,chernical reactants and the fresh fuel-air mixture. This rapid mixing decreases the flame length. However, high swirl is also expected to produce excess turbulence which results in large tangential velocity gradients and a negative flame stretch. The presence of negative stretch' through the tangential velocity gradient at the flame (also quantified by the ICarlovitz number, K=1/A(dA/dt, where A is the flame surface area and t is the time)) decreases the flame surface area and therefore the volumetric burning rate. Because the flame length depends on reaction rate of combustion, it is therefore reasonable that the flame becomes longer from flame 3 to 4. Mean and Fluctuating Temperature Data Two kinds of temperature maps are provided to obtain insight on the local and global thermal structure of the strongly swirling premixed turbulent flames. The raw temperature data is compensated for thermal inertia effects of the thermocouple and for radiative losses. Characteristic temperature probability density function data is also provided both with and without thermal inertia compensation. This will be used to examine the local turbulent thermal structure of the flames. The mean and fluctuating temperature data are presented as temperature contour maps (See Figure 3, 4 and 5). The lines displayed represent the isothermal contours in the flame. A grid representing the probe locations is superimposed with the isothermal maps to facilitate the discussion and to refer to certain areas and points within the flowfield. 3 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 12/29/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms Figure 2 Direct Photograph of Flame 3 (left) and Flame 4 (right) Mean Temperature Contour (Case 3 Mean Temperature Contour Case 4) 2.0 15 S. 8 z 1.0 - 0 0.5 00 00 —1 00 0.5 1.0 00 radial location (r/D) radial location (r/O) 0.5 1.0 Figure 3 Compensated Flame Temperature Contour for Flames 3 (left) and 4 (right) the uncompensated and compensated data reveals that the calculated temperature difference can be as large as 300K at the same location in the flame. Therefore, the importance of the compensation technique for mean and fluctuating temperature measurement can be recognized when it is desired to determine NO emission levels from the temperature data. The importance of accurate temperature data can also be recognized for estimating other pollutant emissions Mean Comoensated_Temoerature Data The results presented in Figure 3 and Figure 4 for flames 3 and 4 show the direct effect of thermal inertia compensation of the thermocouple on flame temperatures. The results of compensated mean temperature contours account for not only the thermal inertia effects of the thermocouple but also the radiative losses from the thermocouple. A comparison of the mean temperature data between 4 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 12/29/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms Temperature Contour (Row Dote) Temperature Contour (Raw Data LO LO 04 00 1111111117AMIMINIM II 111/1111MILIII 11111/Yraralilli 11111/r111 11111a1111 1 wilitaa mmTat 1 \la yr/goo Q4-M1113rio 1 e —'0 —0 3 0.0 natal Iacono.. (r/D) 04 1.0 —1 0 03 03 1.0 rodlo1 OCOthia (F/0) • Figure 4 Uncompensated Flame Temperature Contour for Flames 3 (left) and 4 (right) necessarily improve the overall combustion process. An important task here has been to determine the effect of radial distribution of swirl in a co-annular swirl burner on the global flame development and the subsequent combustion behavior. The mean temperature data showed a bimodal probability density distribution at certain locations of the flame. In the shear layer region, the temperature distribution is bimodal, having two distinct well-defined temperature peaks corresponding to the unburned and recirculated (partially burned) gas mixture, respectively and heat transfer characteristics of the flame. From the compensated mean temperature data shown in Figure 3, one can see that for flame 3 there is a very large reaction region where the mean temperature is 1700K. However for flame 4, the mean temperature reaches 1700K near to the bunter exit. Due to the presence of very strong turbulence at the burner exit in flame 4, the transportation rate of species increases dramatically, which is expected to increase the flame speed. In order to obtain a very stable premixed flame, the flame speed must match the incoming reactant flow speed : In flame 4, the flame speed is expected to be very high and combustion is steady near the burner exit region. This suggests that the mixture must have burned earlier and that the high temperature region occurs at an early stage in flame 4. The overall temperature in flame 4 is lower than that for flame 3. This is attributed to the increased recirculation of external air in flame 4 than flame 3. In addition, the distribution of temperature at downstream positions suggests that in flame 4 the combustion process extends further downstream than in flame 3. In flame 4, the higher swirl number produces large turbulence at the exit of the burner and improves the small scale mixing between the reactants (methane-air mixture) and the hot chemical species. Thus the fuelair mixture begins to react very fast and produces a high temperature reaction region. The strong turbulence also assists in mixing in the larger internal recirculation zone. The entrained mixture reduces the local equivalence ratio and increases the heat loss from the flame, which subsequently decreases the flame temperature and extends the spatial evolution of combustion process. The strong turbulence in the flame can cause local extinction, which results from the discrepancy between the mass diffusivity and the thermal diffusivity. In this case, the mass diffusivity is larger than the thermal diffusivity so that the transport of heat can not keep pace with the transport of mass. From this, one can infer that increasing the swirl number will not Fluctuating Temoeratu re Date. The distributions of fluctuating temperatures for the Flames 3 and 4 are shown in Figure 5. This data supports the observed expansion of the flame length (compare flame lengths and mean temperature data) when the momentum in annulus 2 is maintained constant while the swirl strength in annulus I is changed. All flames stabilized with the 45° swirler in annulus I are longer and somewhat narrower than those with a weaker swirl of 30° in annulus I, when other parameters are constant. The displayed contour line for the 150° temperature fluctuations shows the fluctuating temperature region for flame 3 is much wider than in flame 4. The central core region of the flame was also found to have higher fluctuations for flame 3 than flame 4. A high level of temperature fluctuations is indicative of the strong heat and mass transport phenomenon. In this region many high temperature chemically active species are being mixed with the fresh unburned fuel-air mixture prior to combustion. Combining the fluctuating temperature data with the mean temperature data, one can sec that the reaction rate in the recirculation region is very fast. The fluctuating temperatures in flame 4 are much lower than those obtained in flame 3. This is attributed to the stronger turbulence which enhances the mixing, resulting in a far more uniform 5 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 12/29/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms Fluctuating Temperature Contour (Case 4) Fluctuating, Temperature Contour (Case 3) 2.0 1.0 0.5 110111 MOM MIEN MEM 1111Nreffillin MEM MU EMMENNIBIE 2.0 1.5 halkalla o.s 00 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 radial location (r/D) 0.5 1 0 1111FANIM NIHON IMIC 1111111111111 IL IMIIIIIIIIMMIII 11 a s IA 111111 Ind ims il 111111 11 c if/Al MISTILEIrlal 1.0 0.5 00 radial wooden (ri0) 0.5 1.0 Figure 5 Fluctuating Temperature Contour for Flames 3 (left) and 4 (right) 11ov/field. In both flames, the values of the fluctuating temperatures are much higher than those expected in premixed flames. We attribute this to the swirlers used in the burner for flame stabilization. The large fluctuations in temperature show that the subsequent thermal signatures are far from being uniform. This shows the swirlers' effect on the flow field in premixed flames. products is a good indicator of strong turbulence and large amounts of entrained air in this region. The impact of the compensation can be seen very clearly in the temperature power spectra shown in Figure 6. This compensation effect is responsible for the significantly higher power spectral density at frequencies larger than about 10 Hz. Reasonable information about the local turbulent flame structure can therefore be obtained only after a proper thermal inertia compensation is made to the thermocouple data. The characteristic thermal time scales associated with the premixed flames are important, as they provide information on the large and small scale mixing in the flames. Information on the integral-and micro-scale of thermal signatures was obtained from the auto-correlation of the fluctuating temperature data. Sample retults at two distinctly different locations for flame 3 are shown in Figure 7. The two curves represent the shear layer region and the post flame region. At the shear layer region the micro- and integral- time scales were found to be 0.24 and 0.79 ms, respectively. These time scales changed with position in the flame as well as the flame swirl used for the two flames, as shown in Table 2 and 3. The data clearly show the extent of thermal signature variation in the premixed flames. Temperature Power Spectra and Probability Density Distribution Temperature power spectra as well as probability density distribution of temperatures at various spatial locations in each flame were obtained to determined both with and without the thermal inertia compensation of the thermocouple. Sample results are shown in Figure 6 for flame 3 and corresponds to a spatial location of 0.49 burner diameters away from the flame center and 0.29 diameters downstream the burner exit plane. The results show a significant effect of thermal inertia compensation on the thermocouple signature even at very low frequencies. At higher frequencies the difference between the compensated and uncompensated signals becomes much larger. The results obtained at other locations and in other flames revealed similar findings. The temperature probability density function shown in Figure 6 shows the occurrence of temperatures between 400 K and 1850 K at this location in the flame. The bimodal temperature distribution has two peaks, one at a temperature of about 780 K and the other at about 1550 K. The peak near 780 K indicates the presence of unburned fuel-air mixture and hot gases in the flame, The peak at the higher temperature is caused by hot recirculated combustion products. The presence of both the unburned fuel-air mixture and hot combustion SUMMARY In this study we have obtained quantitative data on mean and fluctuating temperatures in two turbulent premixed swirling flames using fine wire thermometry. A digital compensation technique was used to decrease the effective response time of the probes. The direct flame photographs proved to be a good overall diagnostic tool to document the flame shapes, global behavior, and dimensions. Most preliminary results were first observed by 6 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 12/29/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms Temperature Probability Density Function Temperature Spectrum , 0.0040 moo 4- Mean Temp. Compensated , loo Jo 0.0010 . Uncompensated \in 000 10 1500 . 10.0 tem mho IOW 11..quaney (Hz) Figure 6 Temperature Spectrum and Probability Density Function at Probe Location of r/D=0.49, x/D=0.29 in Flame 3 • Temperature Correlation 1.0 Temperature Correlation . 3 . . . - I con do...Ion coat:dent. R(ley) 04 5 . . . . . . . . . . 4 0. 2 4 0 4 4 5 10 2 -IS IP -10 -5 Oult (en) 0 Dm. et (rns) 10 Figure 7 Micro- and Integral -Time Scales at Two Locations (left diagram: r/D = 0, z/D = 2.34; right diagram: r/D= 0.49, z/D = 0.29) in Flame 3 Table 2 The Temperature Distribution and the Corresponding Time Scales at Four Probe Locations in Flame 3 Location Parameter Mean Compensated Temperature Fluctuating Temperature Thermal Microscale Time Thermal Integral Time r=0 zs0.29 D 1778.7 K 62.7 K 0.75 ms 5.79 ms r=0 z=0 1113.3K 481.8 K 0.41 ms 2.16 ms r=0.49 D z=0.29 D 1193.2K 344.1 K 0.24 ms 0.79 ms 7 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 12/29/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms r=0 z=2.34 D 749.6 K 98.4 K 1.37 ms 12.5 ms Table 3 The Temperature Distribution and the Corresponding Time Scales at Four Probe Locations in Flame 4 Location Parameter Mean Compensated Temperature Fluctuating Temperature Thermal Microscale Time Thermal Integral Time r=0 z=0 1736.9 K 70.3 K 0.45 ms 4.32 ms r=0 z=0.29 D 1746.4 K 84.3 K 2.34 ms 14.4 ms comparing the flame photographs obtained under different operational conditions. The mean and fluctuating temperature measurements provided insight into the local thermal turbulent structure of the premixed flames, they are found to be higher after accounting for the radiative heat loss. Thermal inertia compensation provided significant improvements in determining the flame thermal signatures. The fluctuating values of the measured temperatures are significantly increased after corrections are made for the attenuation in the thermocouple signal at the higher frequencies. Examined premixed flames did not provide uniform thermal field characteristics despite the well mixed fuel-air mixture preparation upstream of the combustor prior to its introduction into the combustor. The use of swirl in turbulent flames therefore significantly modifies the thermal characteristic of the flames. The role of swirl in premixed flames is important from the point of view of flame stability and combustion and emission characteristics. The flow thermal characteristics of the flames changed significantly when the annulus 1 swirl was changed. Different flow structures can be created by varying this parameter. Further work in this area will assist in providing guidelines for better design and use of swirlers in combustors. r=0.49 D z=0.29 D 1647.4 K 178.3 K 0.25 ms 2.80 ms r=0 z=2.34 D 785.6 K 100.8 K 1.08 ms 7.59 ms Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1975, pp. 1367-1377. 5. Gupta, A.K., Beer, J.M., and Swithenbank, J.: Concentric MultiAnnular Swirl Burners: Stability Limits and Emission Characteristics, Sixteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1976, pp. 79-91. 6. Marshall, A.W., and Gupta, AK.: Effects of Jet Momentum Distribution on Thermal Characteristics of Co-Swirling Flames, 34th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1996, Paper No. 96-0404. 7. Qi, S., Gupta, A.K., and Lewis, M.J.: Effect of Swirl on Temperature Distribution in Premixed Flames, 35th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, 1997, Paper No. 97-0373 8. Law, C.K.: Dynamics of Streched Flames; Twenty-Second Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA,1988, pp. 1381-1402. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported by the South Carolina Energy Research and Development Center, Clemson University, program manager Dr. Dan Fant. Assistance provided by Dr. Andre Marshall during various stages of experimentation and diagnostics is greatly appreciated. The help of Armin Wellhoffer, Harald ICafitz and Dr. Jerold Chen on data acquisition and data analysis is much appreciated. REFERENCES 1. Gupta, A.K., Lilley, D.G., and Syred. N.: Swirl Flows, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, England, 1984. 2. Leuckel, I.W. and Fricker, N.: The Characteristics of SwirlStabilized Natural Gas Flames, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1976. 3. Chen, R.H. and Driscoll, J.F.: The Role of Recirculation Vortex in Improving Fuel-Air Mixing within Swirling Flames, Twenty-Second Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1988, pp. 531-540. 4. Gupta, A.K., Syred, N. And Beer, J.M.: Fluctuating Temperature and Pressure Effects on the Noise Output of Swirl Burners, Proc.15th 8 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 12/29/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
© Copyright 2024