15 January 2015 Global Tax Alert News from EU Tax Services EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global Tax Alerts. • Copy into your web browser: http://www.ey.com/GL/en/ Services/Tax/InternationalTax/Tax-alert-library#date Finnish Supreme Administrative Court holds dividends to a US RIC exempt from Finnish withholding tax based on EU free movement of capital Executive summary On 13 January 2015, the Finnish Supreme Administrative Court (the Court) rendered its decision on a case considering the withholding tax treatment of dividends distributed by Finnish listed companies to a US resident regulated investment company (RIC). The Court confirmed that dividends payable to a US resident recipient should be exempt from withholding tax where the dividends would be tax exempt when paid to a Finnish comparable resident recipient under the European Union (EU) principle of free movement of capital of Article 63 TFEU (Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union). Detailed discussion The case addressed the withholding tax treatment of dividends distributed by Finnish listed companies to a US resident Delaware Statutory Trust, a closed-end regulated investment company (RIC). The shares of the RIC were listed on the New York stock exchange. The RIC had applied for an advance ruling from the Finnish Central Tax Board primarily on the question of whether the RIC may be deemed comparable to a Finnish mutual fund for withholding tax purposes and the dividends hence exempted from withholding tax. Finnish mutual funds are considered as separate tax subjects; however, the funds are specifically tax exempt from income tax under a Finnish domestic law provision. The Central Tax Board ruled in the first instance, that the dividends paid to the RIC should be subject to a withholding tax, as the RIC could not be deemed comparable to a Finnish mutual fund. The ruling was appealed to the Court. Finnish law only recognizes mutual funds established on a contractual basis and the Finnish mutual funds have no separate legal personality, whereas the RIC is a separate legal entity. The Court recognized certain legal and functional similarities between a Finnish mutual fund and the RIC, yet the Court concluded that the RIC is objectively comparable to a Finnish limited liability company instead of a Finnish mutual fund. As the RIC was deemed comparable to a Finnish limited liability company, no withholding tax on dividends distributed by Finnish listed companies to the RIC could be levied pursuant to the principle of free movement of capital, as the dividends would have been exempt from tax for a Finnish listed recipient and tax treaty provisions on the exchange of information were in place between Finland and the state of residence of the dividend recipient. Implications The Court confirmed that the EU principle of free movement of capital precludes levying withholding tax on dividends paid to recipients established in nonEU member states, where the dividends would be tax exempt in a corresponding domestic situation. Thus, foreign investment funds together with publicly traded investment companies, both EU and non-EU residents may be entitled to receive Finnish-source dividends exempt from withholding tax, provided that sufficient comparability may be deemed to exist. The case also offers guidance on the factors affecting the comparability of the foreign entity to a Finnish domestic entity. The Court highlighted the importance of the legal form as it deemed the RIC comparable to a Finnish limited liability company, even if it stated that the functional analysis would have supported comparability to a Finnish mutual fund. In previous case law, a SICAV (investment company with variable capital) has been regarded as comparable to a Finnish limited liability company and contractual funds as comparable to a Finnish mutual fund. The statute of limitations for withholding tax purposes is five years under Finnish law. Hence foreign funds may apply for a refund of withholding taxes levied in 2010 or later. A foreign fund may also apply for an advance ruling on the withholding tax treatment of Finnish source dividends to confirm the withholding tax treatment of dividends in advance. For additional information with respect to this Alert, please contact the following: Ernst & Young GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Munich • Dr. Klaus von Brocke +49 89 14331 12287 [email protected] Ernst & Young Oy, Helsinki • Kennet Pettersson • Tomi Viitala • Laura Lahdenperä 2 +358 40 556 1181 +358 45 773 12025 +358 50 364 1013 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Global Tax Alert EU Tax Services EY | Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. EU Tax Services © 2015 EYGM Limited. All Rights Reserved. EYG No. CM5105 This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice. ey.com
© Copyright 2024