COPIES OF THIS AGENDA ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION SERVICE AT THE CENTRAL AND ALL BRANCH LIBRARIES. AGENDA MUNICIPAL SERVICES COMMITTEE January 27, 2015 MEMBERS Margaret McAustin, Chair, District 2 Bill Bogaard, Mayor Terry Tornek, District 7 STAFF Phyllis Currie, General Manager Valerie Flores, Recording Secretary MISSION STATEMENT The City of Pasadena is dedicated to delivering exemplary municipal services, responsive to our entire community and consistent with our history, culture and unique character. Public meeting begins at 4:00 p.m. Agendas and supporting documents are available on the Internet at http://www.cityofpasadena.net/commissions Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Municipal Services Committee after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office at 100 N. Garfield Avenue, Room S-228, Pasadena, during normal business hours. REGULAR MEETING OF THE MUNICIPAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Tuesday, January 27, 2015, 4:00 P.M. 100 North Garfield Avenue, Pasadena, Council Chambers AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – October 14, 2014 and October 28, 2014 – Regular Meetings* November 11, 2014 and November 25, 2014 – Canceled Meetings* 4. INFORMATION ITEMS A. IPA Contract Amendment and Renewal Offers* B. Water Shortage and Conservation Update C. Purchased Water Rate Adjustment for Increased MWD Water Costs D. GT-5 Repowering Project Update* 5. ADJOURNMENT * Attachment NEXT REGULAR MEETING February 10, 2015 Margaret McAustin, Chair Municipal Service Committee POSTING STATEMENT: I HEREBY CERTIFY that this Agenda, in its entirety, was posted on the Council Chamber Bulletin Board S249, the bulletin board in the rotunda area at City Hall, 100 North Garfield Avenue, the City Clerk’s Office, and a copy was distributed to the Central Library for posting on the 22nd day of January, 2015 by 4:00 p.m. Sharon Stovall DISTRIBUTION: MSC Committee Members City Council City Manager City Attorney Central Library City Clerk Director of Public Works Public Information Officer General Manager Director of Planning and Permitting Los Angeles Times La Opiñion Pasadena Weekly Pasadena Star-News Neighborhood Connections Pasadena Journal In compliance with the Disabilities Act of 1990, listening assistive devices are available from the City Clerk’s Office with a 24-hour advance notice. Please call (626) 7447062 or (626) 744-4785 to request use of a listening device. Language translation services are available for this meeting by calling (626) 744-4386 at least 24 hours in advance. Habra servicio de interpretactión disponible para éstas juntas llamando al (626) 744-4386 por lo menos con 24 horas de anticipactión. Items on the agenda may not be called in the order listed. CITY OF PASADENA REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MUNICIPAL SERVICES COMMITTEE OCTOBER 14, 2014 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 100 N. GARFIELD AVENUE (2ND FLOOR) OPENING The Chair called the regular meeting of the Municipal Services Committee to order 4:02 p.m. ROLL CALL: Councilmember Margaret McAustin, Chair Mayor Bill Bogaard Councilmember Terry Tornek Staff: Michael Beck, City Manager Julie Gutierrez, Assistant City Manager Brad Fuller, Assistant City Attorney Phyllis Currie, General Manager, Water and Power Tunji Adedeji, Energy Risk Manager Shari Thomas, Assistant General Manager, Water and Power Fred Dock, Director of Transportation Mark Yamarone, Transportation Administrator Valerie Flores, Recording Secretary PUBLIC COMMENT No one appeared for public comment. NEW BUSINESS AMENDED ENERGY PORTFOLIO RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Tunji Adedeji, Energy Risk Manager provided a PowerPoint presentation summarizing the agenda report and responded to questions. Michael Beck, City Manager, responded to questions regarding the independent audit review process. Phyllis Currie, General Manager, Water and Power, responded to questions regarding the responsibilities of the Energy and Credit Risk Management Committee. Following discussion, it was moved by Mayor Bogaard, seconded by Councilmember Tornek, to approve staff’s recommendation, and forward the item to the City Council for consideration. (Motion unanimously carried) (Absent: none) NEW TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AND THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR CEQA (TRANSPORTATION) Mark Yamarone, Transportation Administrator, provided a PowerPoint presentation summarizing the agenda item and responded to questions. The following individuals spoke in support of staff’s recommendation: Rob Tyler, Pasadena resident Jonathan Edewards, Downtown Associations Wes Reutimann, Day One 01 Pasadena Neighborhood 10/14/2014 Greg Gunther, Pasadena resident Following extensive discussion, the Committee directed staff to develop a process by which Auto Level of Services (LOS) and Street Segment Analysis would be applied to large development projects through standardized conditions of approval in order to address identified effects, with the understanding that this will replace environmental analysis conducted under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) studies of such projects. It was moved by Mayor Bogaard, seconded by Councilmember Tornek, to approve staff’s recommendation, and forward the item to the City Council for consideration with the requested information to be included in the staff report. (Motion unanimously carried) (Absent: none) ADJOURNMENT On the order of the Chair, the regular meeting of the Municipal Services Committee was adjourned at 5:58 p.m. ____________________________ MARGARET McAUSTIN, Chair Municipal Services Committee ATTEST: ____________________ Valerie Flores Recording Secretary 02 10/14/2014 CITY OF PASADENA REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MUNICIPAL SERVICES COMMITTEE OCTOBER 28, 2014 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 100 N. GARFIELD AVENUE (2ND FLOOR) OPENING The Chair called the regular meeting of the Municipal Services Committee to order 4:04 p.m. ROLL CALL: Councilmember Margaret McAustin, Chair Mayor Bill Bogaard Councilmember Terry Tornek Staff: Michael Beck, City Manager Julie Gutierrez, Assistant City Manager Lisa Hosey, Deputy City Attorney Phyllis Currie, General Manager, Water and Power Eric Klinker, Assistant General Manager, Water and Power Wendy De Leon, Customer Relations Manager Gurcharan Bawa, Assistant General Manager, Water and Power Mark Yamarone, Transportation Administrator Richard Dilluvio, Senior Planner, Transportation Shari Thomas, Assistant General Manager, Water and Power Valerie Flores, Recording Secretary PUBLIC COMMENT No one appeared for public comment. Minutes It was moved by Mayor Bogaard, seconded by Councilmember Tornek, to approve the minutes of September 23, 2014 (regular meeting) as submitted. (Motion unanimously carried) (Absent: None) NEW BUSINESS AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO A MASTER INTER-UTILITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PASADENA AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY Wendy De Leon, Customer Relations Manager, provided a PowerPoint presentation summarizing the agenda report, and responded to questions. Phyllis Currie, General Manager of Water and Power, responded to concerns from Committee members regarding the need to safeguard Pasadena Water and Power (PWP) customers, stating that staff will return to the Committee with additional information about the marketing strategies for each specific “Program Order.” Following discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Tornek, seconded by Mayor Bogaard, to approve staff’s recommendation, and forward the item to the City Council for consideration. (Motion unanimously carried) (Absent: none) AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ION THE AMOUNT OF $1,417,400 FOR THE NATURE GAS PIPELINE/METER UPGRADE FOR THE GLENARM REPOWERING PROJECT 01 10/28/2014 Gurcharan Bawa, Assistant General Manager, Water and Power, provided a PowerPoint presentation summarizing the agenda report and responded to questions. Following brief discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Tornek, seconded by Mayor Bogaard, to approve staff’s recommendation, and forward the item to the City Council for consideration. (Motion unanimously carried) (Absent: none) BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (TRANSPORTATION) Mark Yamarone, Transportation Administrator, provided a brief overview of the Bicycle Transportation Plan priorities and responded to questions. Richard Dilluvio, Senior Transportation Planner, provided a PowerPoint presentation summarizing the agenda item and responded questions. The Chair suggested that staff work with Department of Public Works to paint the designated bikeways green. The Chair also suggested that staff simplify the branding of the planned network in order to convey the message of calm, pedestrian/bicycle friendly streets. Following discussion, on the order of the Chair, and by consensus of the Committee, the information was received and filed. WATER CONSERVATION UPDATE Eric Klinker, Assistant General Manager, provided a PowerPoint presentation summarizing the agenda item and responded to questions. The Committee asked that staff create a marketing strategy that will promote the Turf Removal Program, including details on a more simplified removal process. The Chair asked that staff create and make available lawn signs to display the one day watering restriction beginning on November 1st, 2014. Shari Thomas, Assistant General Manager of Water and Power, continued the PowerPoint presentation, summarizing the current water rate structure and briefly discussed the impacts of Assembly Bill 218, and responded to questions. Following brief discussion, on the order of the Chair, and by consensus of the Committee, the information was received and filed. GT-5 REPOWERING PROJECT UPDATE As noted by the Chair, this item was pulled from the agenda and not discussed. Council Comments 02 The Chair asked that staff review the letter and information submitted by Hugh Bowles at the October 27, 2014 City Council meeting regarding the Arroyo Seco Canyon Project, and provide information, if necessary, to the Committee at a future meeting. 10/28/2014 In response to the Committee’s request for a future agenda item on the Sediment Removal Project in Hahamongna Watershed, Julie Gutierrez, Assistant City Manager, stated that an update is already scheduled for the November 3, 2014 City Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT On the order of the Chair, the regular meeting of the Municipal Services Committee was adjourned at 5:52 p.m. ____________________________ MARGARET McAUSTIN, Chair Municipal Services Committee ATTEST: ____________________ Valerie Flores Recording Secretary 03 10/28/2014 CITY OF PASADENA REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MUNICIPAL SERVICES COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 11, 2014 COUNCIL CHAMBERS – ROOM S-249 100 N. GARFIELD AVENUE (2ND FLOOR) The regular meeting of the Municipal Services Committee, scheduled for Tuesday, November 11, 2014 at 4:00 p.m., was cancelled as ordered on November 6, 2014, and posted as required by law. ____________________________________ Margaret McAustin, Chair Municipal Services Committee ATTEST: Valerie Flores Recording Secretary 11/11/2014 CITY OF PASADENA REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MUNICIPAL SERVICES COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 25, 2014 COUNCIL CHAMBERS – ROOM S-249 100 N. GARFIELD AVENUE (2ND FLOOR) The regular meeting of the Municipal Services Committee, scheduled for Tuesday, November 25, 2014 at 4:00 p.m., was cancelled as ordered on November 20, 2014, and posted as required by law. ____________________________________ Margaret McAustin, Chair Municipal Services Committee ATTEST: Valerie Flores Recording Secretary 11/25/2014 4.A IPP Coal Contract Renewal Offers January 27, 2015 Page 2 Recognizing that California utilities are unable to renew their participation in the coal-fueled power plant under California law, IPA successfully sponsored a Utah state legislation (Senate Bill 94) to enable a repowering of the coal-fired project to additional fuel options, including natural gas, in order to facilitate a renewal offer for fuels other than coal for new power generation. LADWP, as Operating Agent and the majority purchaser, in coordination with IPA took the lead in developing a future IPP natural gas repowering proposal (embodied in the draft Second Amendatory Power Sales Contract and the draft Renewal Power Sales Contract) that would potentially replace the coal-fired IPP generation by January, 2025, when the current bonds would have been substantially paid off. Though not explicit, it is expected that coal units will be inoperative after the gas generation commences. Because the new gas plant is expected to replace the coal fired plant during the term of the existing agreements, all purchasers must approve an amendment to the existing Power Sales Contract, referred to as the “Second Amendatory Power Sales Contract,” for the proposed natural gas repowering to go forward. All of the IPP purchasers except Pasadena, Riverside, Burbank, Glendale and one Utah entity have agreed to sign the proposed Second Amendatory Power Sales Contract. Due to the increased risk, loss of existing rights and value, and increased cost anticipated under the natural gas repowering proposal, PWP and these three other California cities have not yet committed to signing the Second Amendatory Power Sales Contract and Renewal Power Sales Contract (commitment to new generation) as written. Despite hearing concerns raised for a long time, IPA has thus far been unwilling to modify the terms of these contracts to address these concerns. On November 21, 2014, IPA met its contractual obligation by formally offering a 50 year extension of the existing Power Sales Contracts for coal-fired generation. Pasadena and other IPA participants in California cannot accept the Coal Renewal offer under California law. IPA has expressed strong desire for the current purchasers to either accept the coal renewal offer or preferably execute Second Amendatory Power Sales Agreement with the option to participate in the future generation. If these renewal offers are rejected, IPA believes it does not have any contractual obligation to the existing purchasers to utilize its facilities (i.e. land, water rights, generation and transmission) after the Existing Power Sales Contracts expire. Either outcome would allow IPA to plan for its future after the current contracts expire. Therefore, if the City declines to accept the current renewal offers and is unable to negotiate an alternative contract structure with an acceptable balance of cost, benefits, and risks, there is a possibility that Pasadena could be left with no contractual rights to any of the IPA-owned generation or transmission facilities after the current contracts expire in June 2027. Negotiations to address these concerns are ongoing. BACKGROUND: This report involves six contracts (two existing and four proposed) related to IPA and IPP: • The Existing Power Sales Contract, as amended on August 1, 1980 and February 1, 1983, expires June 15, 2027.This contract also includes the obligation to pay IPP Coal Contract Renewal Offers January 27, 2015 Page 3 for, and rights to utilize, associated transmission from IPP to the LADWP system in California during the term of the agreement. Under the Existing Power Sales Contract, PWP has a 4.409 % share of IPP (79 MW) and 5.875% share of STS (141 MW). • The Excess Power Sales Agreement, dated December 1, 1980, under which the Utah purchasers assigned their IPP generation and transmission obligations and entitlements to specific California IPP purchasers, including the City of Pasadena. Each year, the Utah purchasers have a right to recall some or all of the capacity assigned to the California Purchasers. This contract expires on June 15, 2027. Under the Excess Power Sales Agreement, PWP has up to a 1.591 % share of IPP (29 MW) and 7.556% share of NTS (98 MW). Historically, the Utah participants have recalled little or none of the capacity assigned to the California IPP purchasers. • The proposed Second Amendatory Power Sales Contract (also known as the natural gas Repowering Amendment) would modify the Existing Power Sales Contract to facilitate replacement of the 1,800 MW coal-fired generating units with an estimated 600-1,200 MW natural gas-fired generating unit or units by 2025, and assure payment of coal-fired facility decommissioning and retirement costs. All existing purchasers must sign it for the new gas generation project to move forward prior to June 15, 2027. • The natural gas Renewal Power Sales Contract would extend the IPP power purchase term beyond June 15, 2027, and replace the coal-fired generation with reduced capacity from the natural gas-fired generation once the new generating units are on line (approximately 2025). Existing purchasers are not obligated to participate in the Renewal Power Sales Contract; however, participation is required for California purchasers to retain any rights to use the STS. • The Renewal Excess Power Sales Agreement with Utah entities and IPA, is similar to the existing Excess Power Sales Contracts and would provide an option for the Utah entities to assign their contractual obligations to the signing California Entities. Existing California purchasers are not obligated to participate in the new generation; however, participation is required for California purchasers to retain any rights to use the NTS. • The Renewal Power Sales Contract (Coal-Fueled Generation), also known as the Coal Renewal Offer, is an alternative to the original natural gas Renewal Power Sales Contract, which would extend, on substantially the same terms and conditions, the Existing Power Sales Contract for coal-fueled generation from June 15, 2027 through 2077. IPA would deem any existing purchaser’s lack of a response by March 21, 2015 to mean the renewal offer has been declined. In addition to the City of Pasadena, the other California purchasers under the Existing Power Sales Contract include the Cities of Anaheim, Burbank, Glendale, Riverside and LADWP. The remaining 30 purchasers are from Utah. Each of the purchasers pays a share of project costs proportionate to its allocation of generation and associated transmission, including debt service. IPP Coal Contract Renewal Offers January 27, 2015 Page 4 The Excess Power Sales Agreement provides a mechanism for the Utah purchasers to lay off to willing California purchasers IPP power and associated transmission that is surplus to the needs of the Utah purchasers’ respective power systems. The proposed Second Amendatory and Renewal Power Sales Contracts developed by IPA and LADWP to meet IPA’s contractual obligation to offer a renewal option are complex documents, and there are many issues of concern to PWP. The following are some of the critical unresolved issues: Concerns with the Second Amendatory Power Sales Contract • Forced participation in gas plant: Whether or not Pasadena chooses to participate in the new gas-fired plant, the Second Amendatory Power Sales Contract requires Pasadena to take a pro-rata share (based on our current contract share) of the new gas plant from the time it commences operation (in 2025 or earlier) until the original June 15, 2027 expiration date (“Transitional Period”). Pasadena would incur the full debt service, operating costs, and amortized decommissioning costs associated with the new gas plant during the Transitional Period. • Loss of Capacity: During the Transitional Period, Pasadena’s capacity entitlement in megawatts is expected to be about two-thirds or less than it would be under the Existing Power Sales Contract. In addition, there is some possibility that none of the capacity from the new gas plant will be accepted by the CAISO as qualifying to meet PWP’s Resource Adequacy Requirement, as the existing grandfathered capacity does. • Gas-Repowering Cost: The capital, operating, and fuel costs of the proposed gas plant are unknown, but expected to be substantially higher than the existing coal plant, which will have no remaining financing costs during the Transitional Period. Although future costs and market conditions are highly uncertain, PWP estimates that ratepayers may be exposed to additional costs totaling $30 to 80 million during the Transitional Period as a result of replacing the existing IPP coal plant with the proposed natural gas plant. Concerns with the Natural Gas Renewal Power Sales Contract • Undefined Project: The proposed Renewal Power Sales Contract requires the City to make a long-term commitment to gas-fired generation that has not been defined in terms of scope, size, technology, estimated cost, or any of a number of critical contractual variables that one would expect to be required prior to making a binding financial commitment. • No Off-ramp: As written, the Renewal Power Sales Contract requires the City to make a commitment today with no meaningful opportunity to adjust that decision in response to updated market conditions and individual utility needs once the project variables and financing needs have been defined (expected to be no earlier than 2019). The Renewal provides for reducing generation commitment by either (a) 20% or (b) to zero, by providing written notice no later than April 2, 2015. The exit provision will have expired before Pasadena signs the Renewal Power Sales Contract. Without a meaningful offramp provision, it may not be prudent to commit to a specific amount of base-load IPP Coal Contract Renewal Offers January 27, 2015 Page 5 natural gas-fired generation in Utah at this point in time when there are other alternatives, including preferred resources (e.g., demand response and renewables), and local gas-fired generation that could also provide flexible/local resource adequacy and reliability benefits. • Transmission: The California IPP participants have financed and paid for the valuable STS and NTS transmission associated with the IPP project, and wish to preserve rights to the transmission in order to access potential renewables, energy storage and other generation in the area, regardless of future participation in IPP. The proposed Renewal Power Sales Contract ties the City’s future transmission rights to its long-term commitment to IPP generation renewal. Some of the IPP participants believe national energy policy has evolved to a different standard since the original contracts were executed in the early 1980’s. Coal Renewal Offer The Coal Renewal Offer period is open for 120 days (until March 21, 2015), after which IPA believes it has met its renewal offer obligation under the Existing Power Sales Contracts, and can offer the IPP assets, including transmission capacity, to any party it wishes for delivery beginning at the end of the Existing Power Sales Contract term. The Emission Performance Standard regulations pursuant to California Senate Bill 1368 (2006), the Greenhouse Gas (“GHG”) Emission Performance Standard, effectively prohibit Pasadena and the other California utilities from accepting the Coal Renewal Offer. Senate Bill 1368 prohibits any load serving entity and any publicly owned utility from entering into a contract or financial commitment with a term of five years or longer unless the base load generation complied with the GHG emissions standard to be approved by the California Public Utilities Commission and California Energy Commission. Subsequently, these Commissions set the GHG emissions standard at 1,100 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt which cannot be met by any currently available coal electric generation technology. Declining the Coal Renewal Offer is also consistent with PWP’s greenhouse gas emission reduction efforts. Current Options Unless other alternative terms or arrangements can be negotiated, then the choices and their consequences are as follows: • Do nothing: PWP would retain existing rights and obligations through June 2027, and the proposed gas plant could not proceed prior to then. There is a possibility that Pasadena could be left with no contractual rights to any of the IPA-owned generation or transmission facilities after the current contracts expire. • Approve and sign the Second Amendatory Power Sales Contract: The IPP coal would likely shut down when new gas plant is operational, and PWP would be committed to taking energy from the new gas plant at full cost through June 2027. This could increase PWP’s costs by $30-80 million over a two-and-a-half year period. PWP would have the option to participate in the gas renewal, but otherwise would be left with no con- IPP Coal Contract Renewal Offers January 27, 2015 Page 6 tractual rights to any of the IPA-owned generation or transmission facilities after the current contracts expire. • Sign the Renewal Power Sales Agreement: Requires approval of the Second Amendatory Power Sales Contract. This would provide PWP with a share of the gas plant and associated rights to the STS for fifty years. • Sign the Excess Renewal Power Sales Agreement: Requires approval of the Second Amendatory Power Sales Contract. This would provide PWP with a share of the gas plant and associated rights to the NTS, both subject to annual recall by the Utah participants, for fifty years. Ongoing Negotiations PWP and other California cities 1 have been engaged with IPA and LADWP regarding alternative arrangements that might potentially address some of the myriad concerns with respect to IPP renewal. There are many parties involved in these negotiations, and many of the issues are outside of the City of Pasadena’s control. Some of the issues are not clear to any of the involved parties and are being clarified with authors of these agreements and IPA. It is the intention of PWP staff to continue to explore with IPA and other IPP purchasers the feasibility of alternative(s) to these proposed agreements that would retain or enhance the overall value of the IPP facilities and assets for the City of Pasadena upon expiration of the Existing Power Sales Contract. Any such alternative(s) involving PWP must be approved by the City of Pasadena City Council in order to become effective. The following are key issues being discussed with LADWP in a good faith effort to resolve major concerns with the hope that LADWP by itself or in coordination with IPA will be able to address these concerns in a manner that would allow the gas renewal project to go forward. 1 • An option to exit the gas renewal project at a later date when costs and operational characteristics are better defined. A City that exits the renewal project at a later date should have no ongoing obligations; • Current purchasers that have paid for these assets should have ongoing rights to STS and NTS transmission; • LADWP should continue to provide unrestricted use of LADWP-owned transmission that delivers energy from STS to the purchasers city; • Address economic losses during the Transitional Period; and, • Address operational requirements identified by purchasers, especially those in the California Independent System Operator. With the exception of Anaheim, which has signed the Second Amendatory Power Sales Contract but has indicated they do not intend to participate in in the natural gas Renewal Agreement. 4.D PASADENA W ATER AND POW ER MEMORANDUM January 27, 2015 To: Municipal Services Committee From: Phyllis, Currie General Manager Subject: Glenarm Repowering Project Status Report This item is for information only. The attached report provides an update to the Municipal Services Committee (“MSC”) on the current activities and status of the Glenarm (“GT-5”) Repowering Project as part of staff efforts to ensure the project stays on schedule and within the budget. The status report lists current activities, major issues, concerns, project pictures, schedule, financial summary, health and safety record, local workforce utilization, and Pasadena First Buy Local activities. Pasadena Water and Power generally provides status reports to the MSC on the second meeting each month. The report format continues to evolve and improve based on the feedback from the MSC, public, and staff. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Glenarm Repower Project Status Report Attachment 1 - Exhibit 1 - Financial Summary Attachment 1 – Exhibit 2 – Project Schedule Attachment 2 – Local Participation Attachment 1 – Glenarm Repowering Project Status Report Status Report January 2015 Glenarm Repowering Project Combined Cycle Power Plant (GT-5) Rendering of GT-5 Greater reliability of Power Most advanced technology Most efficient in its class Least emissions in its class Help integrate solar and wind power Preserve historic buildings on site Glenarm Plant Mid-1950s Main Condenser and Storm Drain Reroute City of Pasadena Water and Power Department Glenarm GT5 Repowering Project Status Report January 2015 The project continues to move forward towards a May/June 2016 Commercial Operation date. The following major activities have occurred since the last update. Budget o City Council approved increase of the project budget by $5 million from $131.9 million to $136.9 million on September 30, 2014 to provide allowance for potential contingencies. o At this time, PWP anticipates completing the project within budget. Balance of the Plant contract (“BOP”) – Contractor: ARB, Inc. o Excavation, backfill and compaction at the site continued. o Electrical conduit bank installation continued. o Equipment procurement is on schedule. o Foundations for gas turbine and cooling tower have been completed. o Storm drain rerouting is under progress. o ARB change order #1 invoice in the amount of $212,110 was submitted. o Change Order #2: HDPE piping for a $22,000 credit, removal of annubar type of flow meter from scope for $8,000 credit, firemain repair $1,775.05, pipe trench closure for $5,751.46, blast and epoxy for $120,000, disposal of excess organic soil in the amount of $112,060.04 and $1,800 for raised floor in the control room. Grand Total of $211,386.55 o ARB has submitted the following change order requests which are being reviewed by the staff but no decision is made yet. Cost to move organic soil to Broadway Plant for $40,677.10 Over-excavate and re-compact above the base bid quantities for $75,525 Disposal of concrete foundations, bricks and contaminated rail road ties for $231,008. Power Island Contract (“PIE”) – Contractor: General Electric o Procurement and manufacturing are proceeding on schedule. o Generator Step-up Transformer testing was completed. o Change Order # 4 - Change the steam turbine enclosure delivery date, incorporate the plant general arrangement drawing into the contract, identify the control panel delivery location, and adjust the plant auxiliary load performance guarantee by 186 kW due to the absence of Variable Frequency Drives for the boiler feed pumps and 52 kW for the use of glycol instead of Dynalene® in the plant chill water loop has been approved. The change order did not result in any cost and was approved. o Change Order # 5 – GE will perform the PLSF model to meet the SCE interconnection request for $8,750. Change order has been approved o Change Order # 6 – GE will modify the GSU transformer mounting base to allow for welding. GE cooling tower supply will accommodate the change in the cooling tower height. Total cost of change order will be $11,117. There is a $3,000 offset by a credit to the City by ARB. Change order has been approved o Change Order # 7 – reschedules the catalyst delivery dates. The change order does not change the contract amount. Site Operations o State street closure is expected the first week of February o Coordination with Power Delivery for installation of 34 kV and 17 kV lines continued Other Project Activities o Hosted site tours for PWP personnel and Executive Leadership group. Major Potential Issues On Going Issues o Updated: California Clean Energy Committee filed an appeal and petitioned for a stay order for the GT-5 Repowering project. The judge denied the petition for the stay order. Oral argument has been set for April 9, 2015. o Updated: Gas Compressor Fire Protection The gas compressor sound attenuation enclosure has been redesigned to have 3 walls and a partial roof. Pasadena Fire Department has indicated they will require a fire protection system for the enclosures. Staff has proposed a fire-eye type of system tied to the main gas trip as an option. o GE’s sound engineer has indicated there may be a need to install sound walls around the generator step-up transformer. The estimate for the sound wall including installation is $200,000. o EIR consultant is claiming approx. $100,000 in costs in excess of the contracted amount. o 89.2% percent of the Power Engineers’ contract amount is expended. Power Engineers has provided a detailed task and cost estimate for their expected remaining involvement. Staff will contain the scope of work to remain within the contracted amount. Schedule o ARB has submitted a schedule with a target for May 16, 2016 for Substantial Completion. Safety o There has been no reportable health and safety related incident or injury. EXHIBIT - 1: Financial Summary EXHIBIT - 1: Financial Summary Glenarm Repowering Project (GT-5) Status Report For MSC on January 27, 2015 Glenarm Repowering Project (GT-5) Status Report For MSC on January 27, 2015 Table 2 - Repowering Project Payments Table 3 - Repowering Project Contingency Updated: January 21, 2015 Reporting Through December 22, 2014 Description Remaining Commitments With Contingencies Payments Updated: January 21, 2015 O P Q Total Awarded, Potential Changes & Project Contingency Applied minus Savings realized (L - M) Spent through 12/22/14 R S % Of Total Amount Spent Awarded and Between Last Report Approved Contract Period (11/13/14) Amount and 12/22/14 (O ÷ E) Contract Contingency Pending Invoices Reporting Through December 22, 2014 Major Contracts Major Contracts PIE Contract - GE Packaged Power $ 61,870,529 $ 36,342,567 $ 0 58.7% $ 2,729,638 PM/CM Contract - PROU $ 3,304,000 $ 636,023 $ 108,566 19.3% $ 138,803 Air Permit -Worley Parsons $ 330,500 $ 307,172 $ 0 92.9% $ CEQA/EIR - PCR Services $ 333,107 $ 227,737 $ 0 97.7% $ BOP Contract - ARB $ 56,432,680 $ 8,996,985 $ 1,236,989 16.2% $ 1,916,120 OE Contract - Power Engineers $ 3,000,000 $ 2,676,642 $ 89.2% $ 53,982 Subtotal: Major Contracts $ 125,270,816 $ 49,187,125 $ 1,345,554 39.5% $ 4,838,543 $ (0) Contract + Project Contingency Contracted Used Remaining (T - U) Approved Committed Change Orders Used Remaining (W - X) Contracted and Allotted (T + W) Used (U + X) Remaining (Z - AA) T U V W X Y Z AA AB PIE Contract - GE Packaged Power $ 1,376,000 $ 19,867 $ 1,356,133 $ 0 $ 1,376,000 $ 19,867 PM/CM Contract - PROU $ 300,000 $ 0 $ 300,000 $ 0 $ 300,000 $ 0 0 Air Permit -Worley Parsons $ 20,000 $ 0 $ 20,000 $ 0 $ 20,000 $ 0 0 CEQA/EIR - PCR Services $ 21,110 $ 15,740 $ 5,370 $ 0 $ 21,110 $ 15,740 $ 212,110 $ 212,110 $ 212,110 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 212,110 $ 1,929,220 $ 247,717 Other Contracts and Miscellaneous PWP & Other Dept. PO's Project Contingency ($2.5 million) 951,008 $ 938,106 $ 1,997 59.6% $ 4,550 Natural Gas Pipeline/Meter Upgrades - Southern Caliornia $ Gas Company 1,417,400 $ 1,288,545 $ 1,288,545 90.9% $ 0 Art Funding $ 302,088 $ 79,156 $ 79,156 26.2% $ 0 Local Hire/Buy Local - CBA $ 83,479 $ 14,105 $ 4,905 16.6% $ 0 AQMD Fees $ 87,790 $ 87,790 $ 0 100.0% $ 0 PWP Labor and Materials $ 1,892,400 $ 1,409,382 $ 1,718 74.5% $ 0 Subtotal: Other Contracts and Miscellaneous $ 4,734,165 $ 3,817,084 $ 1,376,321 71.2% $ 4,550 Project Subtotal $ 130,004,981 $ 53,004,209 $ 2,721,876 40.8% $ 4,843,093 Totals $ 130,004,981 $ 53,004,209 $ 2,721,876 40.8% $ 4,843,093 BOP Contract - ARB $ 212,110 OE Contract - Power Engineers Subtotal: Major Contracts $ 1,717,110 $ 35,607 $ 1,681,503 $ 212,110 $ 0 $ 1,681,503 City of Pasadena Department of Finance, Purchasing Division Pasadena First Buy Local Local Participation Plan Update For the Glenarm Repowering Project (Project) As of January 13, 2015 1) The status of the Local Participation Plan (Plan) is covered in weekly meetings with the contractors to maintain focus on the Local Participation goals. The Plan calls for 15% local subcontracting and procurement. As of January 13, 2015 the Project is reporting $500,162.02 or 29.4% of its subcontracting and procurement has been spent with Pasadena businesses. 2) The Project Labor Agreement calls for 25% of the payroll to be satisfied by Pasadena residents. Staff has been monitoring the onsite certified payroll on an ongoing basis since the start of the Project, and advising the Prime and Project Team on strategies that will enable the Project to meet or exceed the local hiring goal. As of January 13, 2015, ARB and their subcontractors are reporting $162,939.61 in payroll to Pasadena residents, which represents 37.6% of the total payroll for the project. A labor wage summary report is attached for review. 3) Staff provided a “late certified payroll” report to the Project Team, the Prime and subcontractors. The purpose of this report was to inform the team of the contractor’s certified payroll submittals that were more than 14 days late. Staff has recommended that contractors be required to be current with their payroll reports prior to processing their Pay Applications. 4) Staff is facilitating ongoing follow up on requests made from ARB and their subcontractors to the Union halls. At this stage of the Project, there is an adequate Pasadena workforce in unions for meeting the 25% goal. However, ARB has projected that the required workforce for the Project could be increased significantly between now and August 2015. Based on the labor projections for the most utilized trades, it is unlikely that the current supply of Pasadena residents in the unions will be sufficient to keep the Project above 25% through August 2015. Therefore, to increase the number of Pasadena residents in the unions, staff has recommended that the contractor(s) begin to consider Pasadena residents for sponsorship in the most utilized trades. 5) On December 10, 2014 at 8:30AM at City Hall, staff facilitated a “Special Recruitment” for Pasadena residents to join the Pipefitters. ARB is projecting this trade to be one of the top trades for the Project. The pipefitters provided a detailed presentation of their apprenticeship programs and application processes to the approximately 15 Pasadena residents who attended the recruitment. The purpose of this effort was to expand the Pasadena workforce with the unions. The outreach for this effort included direct briefing to various community stakeholders, a posting on the Project’s web page (http://cityofpasadena.net/waterandpower/gt5/), a mailer to over 120 Pasadena residents in our database, distribution to neighborhood associations, community centers and the Central Library, and a posting on the City’s Facebook, Twitter accounts and KPAS. 6) To date, staff has conducted the following outreach efforts to prepare Pasadena residents, and Pasadena businesses for possible economic opportunities on the Project: January 8, 2014, Meet & Greet between Pasadena businesses and pre-qualified prime contractors January 22, 2014, Meet & Greet between Pasadena businesses and pre-qualified prime contractors May 21, 2014, Job Development Skills Workshop for Pasadena residents, conducted by the Foothill Workforce Investment Board May 28, 2014, Opportunity Fair between Pasadena residents, unions and the prime contractor and subcontractors June 14 to 18, 2014, Laborers’ Bootcamp/Special Recruitment for Pasadena residents August 15, 2014, Special Recruitment, Boilermakers, Electricians and Iron Workers for Pasadena residents November 4, 2014, Special Recruitment, Carpenters and Cement Masons for Pasadena residents December 10, 2014, Special Recruitment, Pipe Fitters for Pasadena residents In addition to the targeted outreach facilitated in 2014, a letter that summarizes the individual requirements, documentation, and contact information of various union apprenticeship programs will be sent to Pasadena residents. 7) Staff continued its outreach to local organizations to request contact information for potential Pasadena apprentices to be included in the City’s local hiring database. The purpose of this effort is to ensure that Pasadena residents seeking apprenticeship and employment opportunities are included in the recruitment and referral process. 8) Staff continues to meet with community stakeholders to discuss Local Participation. The purpose of these meetings is to provide information on strategies the City uses to maximize local participation. The benefit of these meetings are information sharing, and overall communication with community members interested in the results of the City’s local hiring and procurement efforts.
© Copyright 2024