A Case of Back Pain

Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
March 2007
A Patient with Low Back Pain
Kimberly Collins, Harvard Medical School Year III
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Case Presentation
MJ is a 48 year-old male with a five month
history of increased low back pain that
radiates down his left leg, left leg
weakness, new onset constipation, and
slow urination.
2
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Low Back Pain
ƒ About 70% of adults have low back pain
at some time
ƒ Low back pain is second only to upper
respiratory illness as a symptom-related
reasons for visits to the physician
3
Deyo, 1992
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Differential for Back Pain
Mechanical Low Back Pain 97%
•
•
•
•
•
Lumbar strain, sprain 70%
Degenerative processes of disks and facets 10%
Herniated disk 4%
Spinal stenosis 3%
Spondylolisthesis 2%
Non-Mechanical Spinal Conditions ~1%
• Neoplasia 0.7%
• Infection 0.01%
• Inflammatory arthritis 0.3%
Visceral Disease 2%
•
•
•
•
Disease of pelvic organs
Renal disease
Aortic aneurysm
Gastrointestinal disease
4
Deyo, 2001
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Deciding whether to image
ƒ Back pain in a patient <50 with no
neurological deficits should be followed
conservatively with follow-up in 6 weeks
ƒ Patients with back pain associated with
neurological signs should have imaging
ƒ Back pain lasting more than 3 months is
considered chronic and should be
imaged
5
Jarvik, 2002
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Deciding whether to image
MJ’s symptoms: low back pain that radiates
down his left leg, left leg weakness, new
onset constipation, and slow urination.
Indications for imaging MJ:
• Left leg sciatica and weakness
• Changes in bowel and bladder function
6
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Imaging modalities for patients
with low back pain
ADVANTAGES
IMAGING
MODALITY
DISADVANTAGES
Plain film
Allows visualization of
bony structures, low cost
CT
Detailed visualization of
bony structures, some
visualization of soft tissue
structures
Best modality for soft
tissue visualization, no
radiation exposure. Test of
choice for back pain with
neurological signs!
Can screen the entire
skeleton, good for
detecting diffuse bone
processes, metastases
Soft tissue is not well
visualized, radiation
exposure
Not great for evaluating soft
tissue, radiation exposure,
expensive
MRI
Bone scan
Difficult to evaluate cortical
bone and calcifications, very
expensive
Low specificity
7
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Imaging modalities for patients
with low back pain
IMAGING
MODALITY
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
CT
Myelography
Used when MRI is
contraindicated, allows
visualization of spinal cord
and nerve roots, can
evaluate for lesions within
the spinal canal
Evaluate for disc disease,
such as tears
Invasive, involves the
injection of contrast into the
thecal sac
Discography
Bone
densitometry/
DEXA
Spinal
angiography
Invasive, rarely used
Measures bone marrow
density, good for
determining fracture risk
Evaluate for AVM,
vascular tumors of spinal
cord
Invasive, rarely used
8
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Anatomy of the lower spine
9
Moore, 2002
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Patient MJ: Axial CT and MRI
Courtesy Fabio Komlos, MD
CT w/o contrast
Courtesy Fabio Komlos, MD
T1W Gad+
A gadolinium-enhancing mass with central calcification is seen within
the spinal canal. The mass is better visualized on MRI.
10
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Patient MJ: Sagittal CT and MRI
CT
Courtesy Fabio Komlos, MD
T1W gad+
Courtesy Fabio Komlos, MD
A gadolinium-enhancing mass with central calcification is seen within
11
the spinal canal. The mass is better visualized on MRI.
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Patient MJ: T2 Sagittal MRI of
Lumbar Spine
The mass is located
within the spinal column
below the level of the
cona medullaris and is
seen compressing the
cauda equina. The
location of the mass can
explain MJ’s symptoms,
which are consistent with
cauda equina syndrome.
12
Courtesy of Fabio Komlos, BIDMC
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Cauda Equina Syndrome
Symptoms include:
• urinary retention
• saddle anesthesia - sensory loss occurring
over the buttocks, posterior-superior thighs,
and perianal regions
• unilateral or bilateral sciatica
• leg weakness
• diminished anal sphinctor tone
Usually caused by a tumor or massive midline
disk herniation.
13
Deyo, 1992
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Intraspinal Masses
Extradural
Intradural
Intramedullary
Extramedullary
14
Courtesy of Fabio Komlos, BIDMC
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Differential for Intraspinal Masses
Extradural
Intradural
Extramedullary
Intramedullary
• Disk disease
• Meningioma
• Ependymoma
• Metastases,
myeloma and
lymphoma
deposits
• Neurofibroma
• Astrocytoma
• Metastases =
“drop mets”
• Infarct
• Hematoma
• Hematoma
• AVM
• Abscess
15
http://intl.elsevierhealth.com/e-books/viewbook.cfm?ID=576
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Patient MJ: T2 Sagittal MRI
A second intraspinal
mass can be seen on
this sagittal MRI.
16
Courtesy of Fabio Komlos, MD
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Patient MJ: Coronal and Axial T1
Enhanced Cranial MRI
Bilateral acoustic schwannomas are a hallmark of NF2.
17
Courtesy of Fabio Komlos, MD
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
MJ’s Diagnosis
ƒ The multiple intraspinal masses and
bilateral acoustic schwannomas seen
on MRI was suggestive of
neurofibromatosis 2.
ƒ The diagnosis was confirmed by
pathology after removal of the
intraspinal masses.
18
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Neurofibromatosis
ƒ There are two types: Neurofibromatosis
Types 1 and 2
ƒ Neurocutaneous syndromes
ƒ Development of neoplasms primarily in
organs derived from embryonic mesoderm
(skin, central and peripheral nervous
systems, eyes)
ƒ Inherited as autosomal dominant conditions
with variable penetrance
19
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Neurofibromatosis
NF1
ƒ Chromosome 17
ƒ Gene product: GTPase
activating protein
ƒ One of the most common
autosomal dominant
disorders
ƒ Cutaneous features:
peripheral neurofibromas,
café au lait spots,
freckling of axilla
ƒ Nervous system tumors:
plexiform neurofibromas,
gliomas, ependymomas,
meningiomas,
astrocytomas,
pheochromocytomas
NF2
ƒ Chromosome 22
ƒ Gene product:
cytoskeletal protein
ƒ Less common autosomal
dominant disorder
ƒ Cutaneous features: café
au lait spots and
peripheral neurofibromas
occur rarely
ƒ Nervous system tumors:
schwannomas,
meningiomas,
ependymomas
20
Ruggieri, 1999
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Companion Patient 1: Plain radiograph
Cutaneous
neurofibroma
seen as a soft
tissue swelling
on plain
radiograph.
21
Courtesy of Jim Wu, MD
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Companion Patient 2: Chest MRI
STIR
T1W Gad+
Plexiform neurofibroma seen in a patient with NF1.
22
Courtesy of Jim Wu, MD
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Companion Patient 3: Plain radiograph
Radiographs
taken before
and after the
onset of leg
pain in a
patient with
NF1. Fibular
fracture is
seen in the
second
radiograph.
23
Courtesy of Jim Wu, MD
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Companion Patient 3: MRI
T1W Gad+
T2W
The fibular fracture occurred due due to mass effect
24
Courtesy of Jim Wu, MD
from a neurofibrosarcoma.
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Summary
ƒ The most common causes of back pain
are mechanical.
ƒ Not all back pain requires imaging.
ƒ MRI is the best modality for imaging
back pain with neurological signs.
ƒ The differential for intraspinal masses
can be divided into extradural, intradural
extramedullary, and medullary.
ƒ Neurofibromatosis is a neurocutaneous
syndrome characterized by tumors of
the skin and nervous system.
25
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
References
Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low Back Pain. N Engl J Med
2001;344(5):363-370.
Deyo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL. What Can the History and Physical
Examination Tell Us About Low Back Pain? JAMA 1992;268:
760-764.
Moore KL, Agur AMR. Essentials of Clinical Anatomy. 2nd edition.
Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002. p 307.
Jarvik JG, Deyo RA. Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with
emphasis on imaging. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:593.
Kasper, Braunwald, et al. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine.
16th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005. p 2457.
Ruggieri M. The different forms of neurofibromatosis. Child’s Nerv
Sys 1999;15:295-308.
http://www.theuniversityhospital.com/healthlink/archives/articles/ne
urofibromatosis.htm
http://intl.elsevierhealth.com/e-books/viewbook.cfm?ID=576
26
Kimberly Collins, MSIII
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Acknowledgements
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Fabio Komlos, MD
Jim Wu, MD
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Pamela Lepkowski
Larry Barbaras, webmaster
27