2 Non-typhoidal Salmonella in Children: Microbiology, Epidemiology and Treatment Gabrielle M. Haeusler and Nigel Curtis Abstract Non-typhoidal Salmonellae (NTS) are an important cause of infectious diarrhoea world-wide. In the absence of immune deficiency, gastroenteritis caused by NTS is usually mild, self limiting and rarely requires intervention. NTS are also an important cause of invasive disease, particularly in developing countries, likely secondary to the high prevalence of coexisting malnutrition, malaria and HIV infection. This review provides an overview of the microbiology, epidemiology and pathogenesis of NTS, and compares recommendations for the treatment of NTS gastroenteritis in children. 2.1 Introduction Non-typhoidal Salmonellae (NTS) are an important cause of infectious diarrhoea world-wide. In the absence of immune deficiency, gastroenteritis caused by NTS is usually mild, self limiting and rarely requires intervention. NTS are also an important cause of invasive disease, particularly in developing countries, likely secondary to N. Curtis () Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne; Infectious Diseases Unit, The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne; Infectious Diseases & Microbiology Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia e-mail: [email protected] G. M. Haeusler Infectious Diseases Unit, The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia e-mail: [email protected] the high prevalence of co-existing malnutrition, malaria and HIV infection. Antibiotic treatment of NTS gastroenteritis has been the subject of a meta-analysis, but questions regarding exactly which patients should be treated and the optimal regimen remain unanswered. This review provides an overview of the microbiology, epidemiology and pathogenesis of NTS, and compares recommendations for the treatment of NTS gastroenteritis in children. 2.2 Classification and Microbiology The genus Salmonella belongs to the family of Enterobacteraciae. Salmonella are separated into two species, Salmonella enterica and Salmonella bongori (previously classified as subsp. V.), with the former being further classified into six subspecies (I, S. enterica subsp. enterica; II, N. Curtis et al. (eds.), Hot Topics in Infection and Immunity in Children IX, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 764, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-4726-9_2, © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 13 14 G. M. Haeusler and N. Curtis Table 2.1 Number of serotypes in each subspecies. (Based on data from Grimont et al. [1]) Species Subspecies Number of serotypes 1,531 enterica (I) 505 salamae (II) 99 arizonae (IIIa) 336 diarizonae (IIIb) 73 houtenae (IV) 13 indica (VI) 22 Salmonella bongori (V) – Total 2,579 Table 2.2 Examples of clinically significant Salmonella serotypes and relevant clinical syndromes according to serogroup. (Based on data from Grimont et al. [1]) Serogroup Salmonella enterica S. enterica subsp. salamae; IIIa, S. enterica subsp. arizonae; IIIb, S. enterica subsp. diarizonae; IV, S. enterica subsp. houtenae; and VI, S. enterica subsp. indica) [1]. While an alternative nomenclature describes the genus as a single species, Salmonella choleraesuis, the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on the Systematics of the Prokaryotes supports the two-species designation [2]. Salmonellae are motile, Gram negative, facultative anaerobic bacilli which rarely ferment lactose [3]. Within the seven subspecies, more than 2,500 serotypes (or serovars) have been reported (Table 2.1) [1]. Salmonellae are classified according to antigenically diverse surface antigens: polysaccharide O (somatic) antigens, H (flagellar) antigens and Vi (capsular) antigens [3]. Agglutination reactions based on the O-antigen are used by most clinical laboratories to divide Salmonella into serogroups which include, but are not limited to, A, B, C1, C2, D and E (Table 2.2) [1]. Strains in these six serogroups cause most of the NTS infections in humans [4]. Formal serotyping, usually by reference laboratories, is required to differentiate clinically significant serotypes as cross-reactivity occurs. A detailed list of all currently recognised Salmonella serotypes is available elsewhere [4]. Salmonella nomenclature and syntax is potentially confusing. An example of a correct Salmonella subspecies and serotype designation is Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serotype Typhimurium. An accepted abbreviation of this full taxonomic designation is Salmonella ser. Serotype examplea A B Paratyphi A Paratyphi B Typhimurium Heidelberg C1 Paratyphi C Choleraesuis Virchow C2 Newport D1 Typhi Enteritidis Dublin a All example serotypes are members monella enterica subspecies enterica Clinical syndrome Enteric fever Enteric fever NTS NTS Enteric fever NTS NTS NTS Enteric fever NTS NTS of subspecies Sal- Typhimurium (capitalised and not italicised) at the first citation and subsequently Salmonella Typhimurium [5]. Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica contains almost all the serotypes pathogenic for humans [3]. Although many Salmonella serotypes exist, they can be broadly categorised as typhoidal or non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) depending on the clinical syndrome with which they are predominantly associated (Table 2.2). The typhoidal Salmonella include the S. enterica subspecies enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi A-C and typically cause systemic illness with little or no diarrhoea. The much larger group of NTS primarily induce acute, self-limiting gastroenteritis and is the focus of this review. 2.3 Epidemiology In contrast to Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi, which are rarely encountered outside endemic countries or in returned travellers, NTS have a worldwide distribution. While the true incidence is unknown, there are an estimated 93.8 million episodes and 155,000 deaths each year attributable to NTS [6]. Data from the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Foodborne Infections Network (GFN) indicate that 2 Non-typhoidal Salmonella in Children: Microbiology, Epidemiology and Treatment Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella ser. Enteritidis account for nearly 80 % of all human isolates reported globally [7]. Unlike Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi, which have host specificity for humans, NTS can be acquired from both animal and humans. While poultry and eggs remain the most common source of NTS, other animal reservoirs include reptiles, rodents, cats and dogs [8, 9]. A case control study in the United States found that up to 6 % of all sporadic NTS infections are attributable to reptile or amphibian contact [10]. Transmission is predominantly foodborne, although other modes include consumption of contaminated water, contact with infected animals and nosocomial exposure [4, 11]. The incubation for NTS gastroenteritis depends on the host and the inoculum. It is usually 12–36 h, although incubation periods of up to nearly 2 weeks have been reported with certain strains [12–14]. 2.4 Pathogenesis Salmonellae are facultative intracellular pathogens that can survive within host macrophages [15]. Unlike typhoidal salmonella, which have the ability to evade the immune system, NTS tend to induce a localised inflammatory response in immunocompetent individuals, provoking a large influx of polymorphonuclear leukoytes to the intestinal lumen [16]. They can also colonise small and large intestinal mucosa thus facilitating prolonged periods of shedding [16]. Host factors predisposing to severe NTS infection include reduced gastric acidity, impaired cell mediated and humoral immunity, and impaired phagocytic function [16–18]. Salmonellae are unable to survive at a gastric pH less than 2.5 [19] and patients with anatomical or functional achlorhydria are at increased risk of developing infection [20]. This is especially relevant to neonates where the combination of relative achlorhydria and frequent milk feeds may contribute to their increased risk of NTS bacteraemia [21]. T-cell immunity is important in controlling Salmonella as evidenced by increased suscep- 15 tibility to invasive NTS in HIV-infection [22, 23] and with corticosteroid use [24]. Children with congenital defects in humoral immunity including X-linked agammaglobulinaemia and common variable immunodeficiency, are also reported to have increased risk of persistent diarrhoea and invasive disease [16]. Impaired phagocytic function seen in chronic granulomatous disease, haemoglobinopathies and malaria similarly increase the risk of invasive NTS infection [16]. In addition, co-infection with Schistosoma has been reported to cause prolonged and severe illness due to altered macrophage function and replication and survival of Salmonella within the parasite [25]. 2.5 Clinical Syndromes Clinical manifestations of NTS can be broadly divided into four groups: 1. Acute gastroenteritis 2. Extra-intestinal infection 3. Non-infectious sequelae 4. Salmonella carriage 2.5.1 Acute Gastroenteritis Non-typhoidal salmonellae usually cause an acute self-limiting gastroenteritis. In contrast to typhoidal salmonella, infection with NTS results in diarrhoea. This is profuse and usually non-bloody. Associated symptoms of fever, abdominal cramping, nausea and vomiting may also occur [4]. Diagnosis is confirmed on stool culture. Fluid and electrolyte disturbances are the most frequent complication of NTS gastroenteritis. Asymptomatic gastrointestinal infection can also occur; however, given the rate of convalescent NTS excretion following acute infection, the true incidence is unknown [26]. 2.5.2 Extra-intestinal Infection Overall, NTS bacteraemia is reported in up to 9 % of patients with acute gastroenteritis [27]. 16 Choleraesuis, Heidelberg and Dublin are among some of the serotypes more frequently associated with bacteraemia [28]. The incidence of invasive disease is also modified by factors such as age, region and underlying immune status. Surveillance data from the United States showed the incidence of invasive NTS was 7.8 cases per 100,000 in infants (aged less 1 year) compared to less than 0.8 cases per 100,000 in older children [29]. Significant discordance in the burden of invasive NTS between continents exists with an estimated annual incidence of up to 388 per 100,000 children (aged less 5 years) in Africa [30]. In this continent, the common invasive serotypes are Typhimurium and Enteritidis. The high prevalence of malaria in Africa, and its association with invasive NTS, has been postulated as one reason for this difference [31]. Interestingly, recent studies in the Gambia, Kenya and Tanzania have shown that the marked decline in malaria prevalence has been paralleled by a similar reduction in invasive NTS [32]. Bacteraemia may result in focal NTS infection at any site, including the central nervous system [33, 34]. Risk factors for focal disease are similar to those for bacteraemia [35], although focal infections in non-immunocompromised children are well described [36]. In one study, 7 of 12 (58 %) immunocompromised children developed focal infection compared with 5 of 132 (4 %) non-immunocompromised children [37]. Salmonella bacteraemia usually presents with fever and/or sepsis. Persistent bacteraemia has been documented in afebrile, well-appearing infants with NTS gastroenteritis emphasising the importance of blood cultures in this population [38]. Conversely, bacteraemia has been described in immunosuppressed patients without a history of gastroenteritis [24]. Notably, in the African setting, the majority of invasive NTS cases do not have gastroenteritis. Salmonella can be cultured from standard blood culture media [3]. Positive urine culture with Salmonella spp. may indicate bacteraemia rather than faecal contamination [39]. Similar to Salmonella Typhi, culture of bone marrow sam- G. M. Haeusler and N. Curtis ples may increase the diagnostic yield of NTS [30, 40]. 2.5.3 Non-infectious Sequelae Non infectious sequelae following infectious gastroenteritis are well described [41]. Reactive arthritis after NTS infection has been reported in up to 29 % of patients [42]. There are conflicting data on the association between antibiotic treatment for acute NTS gastroenteritis and subsequent development of musculoskeletal symptoms, some suggesting a decreased risk and others an increased risk [42]. 2.5.4 Salmonella Carriage Salmonella carriage is defined as asymptomatic excretion following acute infection and can be divided into convalescent carriage and chronic carriage. 2.5.4.1 Convalescent Carriage Convalescent carriage occurs frequently after symptomatic or asymptomatic NTS infection. Fig. 2.1 shows the duration of excretion of NTS in 13 studies according to age [43]. The median duration of NTS excretion in children less than 5 years of age is 7 weeks, with 18 % remaining culture positive at 6 months. Carriage is shorter in older children with a median duration of 3–4 weeks with only 0.3 % remaining culture positive at 6 months. In addition to younger age, factors associated with prolonged duration of excretion include symptomatic infection, treatment with antibiotics and infection with strains other than Salmonella Typhimurium (Fig. 2.2) [43]. Episodic excretion is not uncommon. 2.5.4.2 Chronic Carriage Documented excretion of NTS for more than 1 year is defined as chronic carriage [44]. This occurs in up to 2.6 % of children under 5 years of age and 0.3 % of older children [43]. 2 Non-typhoidal Salmonella in Children: Microbiology, Epidemiology and Treatment 17 Fig. 2.1 Duration of excretion of NTS by age (by permission of Oxford University Press). [43] Fig. 2.2 Duration of excretion of NTS by serotype (by permission of Oxford University Press). [43] 2.6 Treatment Recommendations for the treatment of acute gastroenteritis due to NTS vary (Table 2.3). The rationale for treatment of both acute NTS gastroenteritis and carriage will be the focus of the remainder of this review. Recommendations for the treatment of extra-intestinal complications of NTS are available elsewhere [4]. Antibiotic agents with in vitro and in vivo activity against NTS include ampicillin/amoxicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracyclines, third generation cephalosporins, macrolides and fluoroquinolones. Aminoglycosides show good in vitro activity but poor clinical efficacy and are not recommended [9, 45]. Ciprofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones have previously been restricted in children due an association with arthropathy, first described in young beagles [46]. However, a systematic review of the safety of ciprofloxacin in children has found that musculoskeletal adverse effects are infrequent (risk 1.6 %, 95 % CI 0.9–2.6 %), generally mild and usually reversible [47]. 2.6.1 NTS Gastroenteritis A Cochrane review of trials investigating antibiotic treatment of NTS concluded that there was no evidence to support antibiotic therapy in otherwise healthy children and adults with nonsevere diarrhoea [58]. It included 12 randomised controlled trials (RCT) published before 1998, of which only five reported on clinical outcomes that were extractable for meta-analysis. Importantly, almost all trials excluded infants less than 6 weeks and patients with underlying disease and 18 G. M. Haeusler and N. Curtis Table 2.3 Recommendations for the treatment of acute NTS gastroenteritis. (With duration of treatment and/or specified antibiotic choice when stated in source) Source Age < 3 months Severe infection Immunocompromised Chronic Haemoglobinopa- GI disease thies Other Infectious diseases and paediatric reference books Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (Feigin and Cherry) [48] Forfar and Arneil’s Textbook of Pediatrics [49] Evidence-based Pediatric Infectious Diseases (Isaacs) [50] Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (Long) [51] Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases [4] Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics [52] Oski’s Principles and Practice of Pediatrics [53] Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases [12] Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn (Remington & Klein) [21] Rudolph’s Pediatrics [54] The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy [45] Yes, 5d – Yes, 5d Yes, 5d – – Yes – Yes – – – Yes, 5–7d Yes, 5–7d Malnourished, 5–7d – Yes – Yes, 5–7d Yes, 5–7d Yes, 5–7d, ciprofloxacin or azithromycin (empiric) and amoxicillin if susceptible Yes – Yes – – – Yes, 7–14d, fluoroquinolone Yes, 7–14d Yes, 7–14d – – Yes – Yes Malnourished Yes, as per susceptibilities – Yes, 3–5d – – Yes, as per Yes, as per Yes, as per susceptisusceptisusceptibilities bilities bilities Yes, 3–5d – – – Yes Yes ( < 1y), 7–10d, fluoroquinolone – Yesb, 7–10d, fluoroquinolone Yes, 2–3d – Yes, 7–14d Other sources IDSA Guidelines 2001 [55] Yes ( < 6m), 3–7d Yes ( < 6m) NICE guidelines: Diarrhoea and Vomiting Caused by Gastroenteritis [56] UpToDate [57] Yes, 3–10d a b Yes Yes, 14d, fluoroquinolone Yes – Valvular heart disease; joint disease, 2–3d – Yes, 7–10d, fluoroquinolone – – – Haemodialysis; vascular aneurysm; prosthetic joints, 7–10d, fluoroquinolone Yes, 3–7d Yes, minimum 14d – Yes – – – – Valvular heart disease, 3–7d Malnourished Yesa, 3–7d Yes, minimum 14d – – Yes, minimum 1d Defined as high fever, severe diarrhoea ( > 9 stools per day), need for hospitalisation Defined as hospitalised with fever and severe diarrhoea 2 Non-typhoidal Salmonella in Children: Microbiology, Epidemiology and Treatment severe illness. Five studies were in infants and children ( n = 258), with only one study including infants less than 4 weeks [59–63]. The review did not identify significant differences in length of illness, diarrhoea or fever between any antibiotic regimen and placebo. Furthermore, although antibiotics were associated with more negative stool cultures during the first week of treatment, clinical relapse was more common and there were more cases of positive cultures at three weeks in the antibiotic-treated group. Adverse drug reactions, including rash, gastrointestinal upset and headache, were also more common in the antibiotic group [58]. Given the exclusion criteria, these results can not be extrapolated to patients at higher risk of severe and invasive infection. Although the treatment of patients with risk factors for invasive disease seems reasonable, a benefit has not been documented in a RCT. This paucity of data likely explains the discrepancies in treatment recommendations between guidelines and reference books detailed in Table 2.3. Despite this variability, recommendations for the treatment of infants under 3–6 months of age and immunocompromised patients are consistent between all identified references. A 1988 consensus statement for the management of Salmonella infections in the first year of life similarly recommends treatment in infants less than 3 months following a blood culture irrespective of the severity of illness [64]. Other conditions where treatment has been recommended, albeit less consistently, include haemaglobinopathies, chronic gastrointestinal disease (for example inflammatory bowel disease), severe infection, malnourished state and vascular or joint disease. Agents for treatment of NTS can be divided into non-absorbable (colistin and neomycin), absorbable (ampicillin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, macrolide and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) and those with potent intra-cellular activity (fluoroquinolones) [58]. As Salmonellae are intracellular pathogens, it is postulated that the latter may be more effective in treatment of this infection and is specifically recommended for treatment of immunocompromised patients in two sources [4, 45]. The Cochrane review included eight trials involving fluroquinolones [58]. Subgroup analysis showed no benefit of treatment 19 with fluoroquinolones, although negative stool cultures in the first week of treatment were more likely with fluroquinolone treatment compared to other absorbable antibiotics. Consequently, as there are insufficient data to recommend a particular agent, empiric treatment should be based on local susceptibility data and modified according to susceptibility results. The optimal duration of treatment of NTS gastroenteritis has not been studied. Recommendations vary amongst sources between 3 and 14 days depending on the underlying condition (Table 2.3). Of the trials included in the Cochrane review, duration varied between 1 and 14 days, with 5 days being the most common treatment regimen. The authors commented that the two studies with longer antibiotic treatment duration (10 and 14 days) showed an apparent benefit of antibiotics at 8–21 days [58]. Subsequent to this review, a study reported that 10 days of ofloxacin compared with 5 days resulted in earlier eradication of NTS without an increase in carriage [65]. However, this study was relatively small and did not include a placebo arm. Other trials have also been published since the last Cochrane review update in 1999 with conflicting results [66, 67]. An updated meta-analysis is awaited [68]. 2.6.2 Convalescent NTS Carriage Treatment of convalescent NTS carriage in children has not been subject to RCT but is generally not recommended (Table 2.4). 2.6.3 Chronic NTS carriage There are no RCT investigating the treatment of chronic NTS carriage in healthy children. In adults with chronic carriage, norfloxacin and azithromycin were no better than placebo in eradicating carriage and were associated with higher rates of re-infection and selection of drugresistant isolates in endemic areas [69]. However, although antibiotics have been shown to prolong NTS excretion, this paradoxical finding may only 20 G. M. Haeusler and N. Curtis Table 2.4 Recommendations for treatment of convalescent and chronic NTS. (With duration of treatment and/or specified antibiotic choice when stated in source) Source Convalescent excretion Infectious diseases and paediatric reference books Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (Feigin – and Cherry) [48] Forfar and Arneil’s Textbook of Pediatrics [49] Not recommended Evidence-based Pediatric Infectious Diseases Not recommended (Isaacs) [50] Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious – Diseases (Long) [51] Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s Principles and ‘Not recommended for Practice of Infectious Diseases [4] uncomplicated convalescent excretion’ Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics [52] – Oski’s Principles and Practice of Pediatrics [53] Not recommended Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on – Infectious Diseases [12] Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Not recommended for infants (Remington & Klein) [21] Rudolph’s Pediatrics [54] – The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy [45] – Other sources IDSA Guidelines 2001 [55] NICE Guideline: Diarrhoea and Vomiting Caused by Gastroenteritis [56] UpToDate [57] Chronic carriage (> 1 year) Not recommended – – ‘Treatment of persons with asymptomatic carriage of NTS is controversial’ – Not recommended Not recommended – – – – – – – – Recommended for all patients. Duration: 4–6 weeks; fluoroquinolone HIV infection: ‘consider suppressive prophylactic therapy if failure to eradicate’ be relevant following treatment of acute NTS infection. In the Cochrane review, only three trials included asymptomatic patients (7.2 % of all participants) and separate data were not available for subgroup analysis [58]. Treatment of chronic NTS carriage is recommended in one source, based on data for the eradication of chronic Salmonella Typi and Paratyphi [57, 70] (Table 2.4). In patients with HIV infection, prolonged ciprofloxacin (minimum 3 months) may also reduce NTS relapse [71] and up to 6 months suppressive treatment is recommended for HIV-infected adolescents and adults with recurrent NTS bacteraemia [72]. 2.7 NTS and Pregnancy Pregnancy does not appear to increase the risk of maternal NTS infection. Screening of a large cohort of pregnant women (30,471) at the time of delivery detected NTS in only 60 (0.2 %), of which 17 (28 %) were symptomatic [73]. Of the 60 babies born, only seven (11.7 %) excreted NTS and five (8.3 %) had gastroenteritis. Transplacental infection can occur in the setting of maternal NTS bacteraemia and is often lethal to the foetus [74]. Transmission of NTS through breast milk has also been described, including three nursery outbreaks due to infected pooled milk [75]. More 2 Non-typhoidal Salmonella in Children: Microbiology, Epidemiology and Treatment 21 Table 2.5 Infection control recommendations Source Recommendation Infectious diseases and paediatric reference books Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Hospitalised patient: standard and contact precautions until stool (Feigin and Cherry) [53] cultures are negative. Surveillance cultures on all neonates in nursery Forfar and Arneil’s Textbook of Pediatrics ‘No restriction of activities if stool is normal’ [49] Evidence-based Pediatric Infectious – Diseases (Isaacs) [50] Principles and Practice of Pediatric Hospitalised patient: standard and contact precautions Infectious Diseases (Long) [51] Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s Principles Hospitalised patient: standard and contact precautions and Practice of Infectious Diseases [4] Health care worker: exclusion until asymptomatic and passing formed stool Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics [52] – Oski’s Principles and Practice of Pediatrics – [53] Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee Hospitalised patient: Standard and contact precautions for diapered on Infectious Diseases [12] and incontinent children for duration of illness Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn (Remington & Klein) [21] Rudolph’s Pediatrics [54] The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy [45] Infection control sources CDC: 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions [95] NHMRC: Australian Guidelines for Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare [96] Other sources IDSA Guideline 2001 [55] NICE guideline: Diarrhoea and Vomiting caused by Gastroenteritis [56] UpToDate [57] Child care: exclusion until diarrhoea resolves. Contacts do not require stool culture. Exclude symptomatic contacts until diarrhoea resolves Hospitalised neonate: standard and contact precautions. ‘When two or more cases are recognized, environmental cultures, cultures of all infants, cohorting, early discharge of infected infants, and thorough cleaning of all possible fomites in the nursery and delivery rooms are recommended. If cases continue to occur, the nursery should be closed to further admissions’ – – Hospitalised patient: standard and contact precautions for diapered or incontinent persons for duration of illness Hospitalised patient: contact precautions for faecally incontinent patients for duration of illness Health care worker: exclusion until 24 h after symptoms have resolved – Childcare/school: exclusion until 48 h after symptoms have resolved Healthcare workers: exclusion until diarrhoea resolves Food handlers: as above recently, outbreaks associated with formula feed have been reported [76]. Treatment of asymptomatic maternal NTS carriage is unlikely to be of benefit, but should be considered for severe infection. There are no guidelines for empiric treatment of neonates with known maternal excretion. Due to the increased risk of severe infection in this group, consideration should be given to screening and treatment, as outlined previously, if NTS is detected in the stool [77]. 22 G. M. Haeusler and N. Curtis 2.8 Antibiotic Resistance 2.9 Infection Control Antibiotic-resistant NTS are associated with increased treatment failure and risk of invasive disease [78]. Worldwide surveillance data has demonstrated an overall increase in antibiotic resistance among NTS, although significant geographical and serotype variability exist [79, 80]. The widespread use of antibiotics in food animals has been implicated in the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistant NTS [81]. The European Centre for Disease Control (formally Enter-net) and the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) provide comprehensive surveillance data on rates of NTS drug resistance in Europe and the United States [82, 83]. Data from these studies, as well as reports from middle to low income countries, indicate high rates of ampicillin, amoxicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance, particularly among the globally prevalent serotypes Salmonella Enterididis and Salmonella Typhimurium [82–84]. Of particular concern is the emergence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes in NTS [80], as well as reports of carbapenemase-containing NTS isolates [85, 86], both of which confer high level antimicrobial resistance. Fluoroquinolones and third generation cephalosporins are frequently used for the treatment of NTS that are resistant to conventional antibiotics, although reports of increasing resistance to these second line agents are emerging [80]. Isolates resistant to nalidixic acid are frequently resistant to fluoroquinolones, and this is a recommended screening test for ciprofloxacin resistance [3]. However, although a study found the nalidixic acid disk diffusion method was 100 % sensitive for the detection of reduced ciprofloxacin susceptibility (defined as MIC > 0.125 μg/ml) [87], there have been subsequent reports of isolates that are susceptible to nalidixic acid but exhibit reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin [88]. Outbreaks of NTS have been reported in neonatal units, paediatric wards and child care facilities [11, 89]. However, despite the frequency of asymptomatic NTS excretion following acute infection, the risk of transmission from asymptomatic health care workers to patients appears to be small when strict adherence to hand hygiene is observed [90]. Similarly, transmission from asymptomatic food handlers is rare, with one survey identifying only 2 % of food handlers as the source of 566 NTS outbreaks [91]. Methods to control the spread of Salmonella include appropriate food preparation, water sanitation and strict hand hygiene. Most resources recommend exclusion of children, health care workers and food handlers from childcare/school or work until 24–48 h after resolution of symptoms (Table 2.5). For symptomatic hospitalised patients, standard and contact precautions are recommended. There are also some non-randomised data that suggest the prophylactic use of antibiotics (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or ciprofloxacin) in addition to strict barrier nursing, may control nosocomial Salmonella epidemics [92–94]. Confirmation of clearance of NTS is generally not recommended. Acknowledgements We wish to thank Steve M. Graham for his helpful comments and suggestions. References 1. Grimont PAD, Weill F (2007) Antigenic Formulae of the Salmonella Serovars. 9th edn. Institut Pasteur, Paris 2. Tindall BJ, Grimont PAD, Garrity GM, Euzeby JP (2005) Nomenclature and taxonomy of the genus Salmonella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:521–524 3. Nataro JP, Bopp CA, Fields PI, Kaper JB, Strockbine NA (2011) Escherichia, Shigella, and Salmonella. In: Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Funke G, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Warnock DW (eds.). Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 10th edn. ASM, Washington, DC, p 603–626 2 Non-typhoidal Salmonella in Children: Microbiology, Epidemiology and Treatment 4. Pegues DA, Miller SI (2010) Salmonella Species, including Salmonella Typhi. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (eds). Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s Principles and Practices of Infectious Diseases, 7th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, p 2887–2903 5. Brenner FW, Villar RG, Angulo FJ, Tauxe R, Swaminathan B (2000) Salmonella nomenclature. J Clin Microbiol 38:2465–2467 6. Majowicz SE, Musto J, Scallan E, Angulo FJ, Kirk M, O’Brien SJ et al (2010) The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clin Infect Dis 50:882–889 7. Vieira A, Jensen AR, Pires SM, Karlsmose S, Wegener HC, Wong DLF (2009) WHO Global Foodborne Infections Network Country Databank—a resource to link human and non-human sources of Salmonella. Int Soc Vet Epidemiol Econ 643:512–517 8. Braden CR (2006) Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and eggs: a national epidemic in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 43:512–517 9. Hohmann EL (2001) Nontyphoidal salmonellosis. Clin Infect Dis 32:263–269 10. Mermin J, Hutwagner L, Vugia D, Shallow S, Daily P, Bender J et al (2004) Reptiles, amphibians, and human Salmonella infection: a populationbased, case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 38(Suppl 3):S253–261 11. Weikel CS, Guerrant RL (1985) Nosocomial salmonellosis. Infection Control: IC 6:218–220 12. AAP (2006) Salmonella Infections. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, Long SS (eds). Red Book: 2009 Report of the Commitee on Infectious Diseases, 28th edn. American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, p 584–588 13. Blaser MJ, Newman LS (1982) A review of human salmonellosis: I. Infective dose. Rev Infect Dis 4:1096–1106 14. Seals JE, Parrott PL, McGowan JE, Jr., Feldman RA (1983) Nursery salmonellosis: delayed recognition due to unusually long incubation period. Infection Control: IC 4:205–208 15. Garcia-del Portillo F (2001) Salmonella intracellular proliferation: where, when and how? Microbes Infect 3:1305–311 16. Dougan G, John V, Palmer S, Mastroeni P (2011) Immunity to salmonellosis. Immunol Rev 240:196–210 17. Gondwea EN, Molyneuxa ME, Goodallc M, Graham SM, Mastroenig P, Draysonc MT et al (2010) Importance of antibody and complement for oxidative burst and killing of invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella by blood cells in Africans. PNAS 107:3070–3075 18. MacLennan CA, Gondwe EN, Msefula CL, Kingsley RA, Thomson NR, White SA et al (2008) The neglected role of antibody in protection against nontyphoidal salmonella bacteremia in African children. J Clin Invest 118:1553–1562 23 19. Tennant SM, Hartland EL, Phumoonna T, Lyras D, Rood JI, Robins-Browne RM et al (2008) Influence of gastric acid on susceptibility to infection with ingested bacterial pathogens. Infect Immun 76:639–645 20. Buchin PJ, Andriole VT, Spiro HM (1980) Salmonella infections and hypochlorhydria. J Clin Gastroenterol 2:133–138 21. O’Ryan ML, Nataro JP, Cleary TG (2011) Microorganisms Responsible for Neonatal Diarrhea. In: Remington JS, Klein JO, Wilson CB, Nizet V, Maldonado Y (eds). Remington: Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn, 7th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, p. 359–418 22. Moir S, Fauci AS (2010) Immunology. Salmonella susceptibility. Science 328:439–440 (New York, NY) 23. Celum CL, Chaisson RE, Rutherford GW, Barnhart JL, Echenberg DF (1987) Incidence of salmonellosis in patients with AIDS. J Infect Dis 156:998–1002 24. Ramos JM, Garcia-Corbeira P, Aguado JM, Arjona R, Ales JM, Soriano F (1994) Clinical significance of primary vs. secondary bacteremia due to nontyphoid Salmonella in patients without AIDS. Clin Infect Dis 19:777–780 25. Abruzzi A, Fried B (2011) Coinfection of Schistosoma (Trematoda) with bacteria, protozoa and helminths. Adv Parasitol 77:1–85 26. Jertborn M, Haglind P, Iwarson S, Svennerholm AM (1990) Estimation of symptomatic and asymptomatic Salmonella infections. Scand J Infect Dis 22:451–455 27. Mandal BK, Brennand J (1988) Bacteraemia in salmonellosis: a 15 year retrospective study from a regional infectious diseases unit. BMJ 297:1242– 1243 (Clinical research ed) 28. Jones TF, Ingram LA, Cieslak PR, Vugia DJ, TobinD’Angelo M, Hurd S et al (2008) Salmonellosis outcomes differ substantially by serotype. J Infect Dis 198:109–114 29. Vugia DJ, Samuel M, Farley MM, Marcus R, Shiferaw B, Shallow S et al (2004) Invasive Salmonella infections in the United States, FoodNet, 1996– 1999: incidence, serotype distribution, and outcome. Clin Infect Dis 38(Suppl 3):S149–156 30. Gordon MA (2011) Invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella disease: epidemiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 24:484–489 31. Graham SM (2010) Nontyphoidal salmonellosis in Africa. Curr Opin Infect Dis 23:409–414 32. Scott AJ, Berkley JA, Mwangi I, Ochola L, Uyoga S, Macharia A et al (2011) Relation between falciparum malaria and bacteraemia in Kenyan children: a population–based, case-control study and a longitudinal study. Lancet 378:1316–1323 33. Schutze GE, Schutze SE, Kirby RS (1997) Extraintestinal salmonellosis in a children’s hospital. Pediatr Infect Dis J 16:482–485 24 34. Owusu-Ofori A, Scheld WM (2003) Treatment of Salmonella meningitis: two case reports and a review of the literature. Int J Infect Dis 7:53–60 35. Sirinavin S, Jayanetra P, Lolekha S, Layangkul T (1988) Predictors for extraintestinal infection in Salmonella enteritis in Thailand. Pediatr Infect Dis J 7:44–48 36. Galanakis E, Bitsori M, Maraki S, Giannakopoulou C, Samonis G, Tselentis Y (2007) Invasive non-typhoidal salmonellosis in immunocompetent infants and children. Int J Infect Dis 11:36–39 37. Zaidi E, Bachur R, Harper M (1999) Non-typhi Salmonella bacteremia in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 18:1073–1077 38. Katz BZ, Shapiro ED (1986) Predictors of persistently positive blood cultures in children with “occult” Salmonella bacteremia. Pediatr Infect Dis 5:713–714 39. Ramos JM, Aguado JM, Garcia-Corbeira P, Ales JM, Soriano F (1996) Clinical spectrum of urinary tract infections due on nontyphoidal Salmonella species. Clin Infect Dis 23:388–390 40. Gasem MH, Keuter M, Dolmans WMV, Van Der Ven-Jongekrijg J, Djokomoeljanto R, Van Der Meer JWM (2003) Persistence of Salmonellae in blood and bone marrow: randomized controlled trial comparing ciprofloxacin and chloramphenicol treatments against enteric fever. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:1727–1731 41. Ternhag A, Torner A, Svensson A, Ekdahl K, Giesecke J (2008) Short–and long-term effects of bacterial gastrointestinal infections. Emerg Infect Dis 14:143–148 42. Arnedo-Pena A, Beltran-Fabregat J, Vila-Pastor B, Tirado-Balaguer MD, Herrero–Carot C, BellidoBlasco JB et al (2010) Reactive arthritis and other musculoskeletal sequelae following an outbreak of Salmonella hadar in Castellon, Spain. J Rheumatol 37:1735–1742 43. Buchwald DS, Blaser MJ (1984) A review of human salmonellosis: II. Duration of excretion following infection with nontyphi Salmonella. Rev Infect Dis 6:345–356 44. Corrado ML, DuPont HL, Cooperstock M, Fekety R, Murray DM (1992) Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of chronic carriage of Salmonella. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration. Clin Infect Dis 15(Suppl 1):S259–262 45. Gilbert DN, Moellering RC, Eliopoulis GM, Saag MS (2011) The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy, 41st edn 46. Ingham B, Brentnall DW, Dale EA, McFadzean JA (1977) Arthropathy induced by antibacterial fused N-alkyl-4-pyridone-3-carboxylic acids. Toxicol Lett 1:21–26 47. Adefurin A, Sammons H, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Choonara I (2011) Ciprofloxacin safety in paediatrics: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child 96:874–880 G. M. Haeusler and N. Curtis 48. Pickering LK (2009) Approach to Patients with Gastrointestinal Tract Infections and Food Poisoning. In: Feigin RD, Cherry J, Demmler-Harrison G, Kaplan S (eds). Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. Elsevier, Philadelphia, p 621–653 49. Graham SM (2008) Salmonellosis. In: McIntosh N, Helms P, Smyth R, Logan S (eds). Forfar and Arneil’s Textbook of Pediatrics, 7th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, p 1246–1249 50. Isaacs D (2007) Gastrointestinal infections. In: Elliot E, Gilbert R, Moyer V, Pichichero M (eds). Evidence-based Pediatric Infectious Diseases. Blackwell Publishing, United Kingdom, p 74–101 51. Reller ME (2009) Salmonella Species. In: Long SS, Pickering LK, Prober C (eds). Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, p 812–817 52. Bhutta ZA (2011) Salmonella. In: Kliegman RM, Stanton BMD, St Geme J, Schor N, Behrman RE (eds). Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, 19th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, p 948–958 53. Pickering LK (2006) Salmonella Infections. In: McMillan JA, Feigin RD, DeAngelis D, Jones MD (eds). Oski’s Pediatrics: Principles and Practice, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 1112–1116 54. Pavia AT (2011) Salmonella, Shigella, and Escherichia coli. In: Rudolph C, Rudolph A, Lister G, First L, Gershon A (eds). Rudolph’s Pediatrics, 22nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York 55. Guerrant RL, Van Gilder T, Steiner TS, Thielman NM, Slutsker L, Tauxe RV et al (2001) Practice guidelines for the management of infectious diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 32:331–351 56. (2009) Diarrhoea and vomiting caused by gastroenteritis: diagnosis, assessment and management in children younger than 5 years. RCOG, London 57. Hohmann EL (2012) Approach to the patient with nontyphoidal Salmonella in a stool culture. In: Baron EL (ed). UpToDate, Waltham 58. Sirinavin S, Garner P (2000) Antibiotics for treating salmonella gut infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online):CD001167 59. Garcia de Olarte D, Hugo TS, Nancy AO, Nelson JD, Haltalin KC (1974) Treatment of Diarrhea in Malnourished Infants and Children: A Double-Blind Study Comparing Ampicillin and Placebo. Am J Dis Child 127:379–388 60. Nelson JD, Kusmiesz H, Jackson LH, Woodman E (1980) Treatment of Salmonella gastroenteritis with ampicillin, amoxicillin, or placebo. Pediatrics 65:1125–1130 61. Haltalin KC, Kusmiesz HT, Hinton LV, Nelson JD (1972) Treatment of Acute Diarrhea in Outpatients: Double-Blind Study Comparing Ampicillin and Placebo. Am J Dis Child 124:554–561 62. Kazemi M, Gumpert TG, Marks MI (1973) A controlled trial comparing sulfametboxazole–trimethoprim, ampicillin, and no therapy in the treatment 2 Non-typhoidal Salmonella in Children: Microbiology, Epidemiology and Treatment 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. of salmonella gastroenteritis in children. J Pediatr 83:646–650 Macdonald WB, Friday F, McEacharn M (1954) The Effect of Chloramphenicol in Salmonella Enteritis of Infancy. Arch Dis Child 29:238–241 Geme JW, 3rd, Hodes HL, Marcy SM, Pickering LK, Rodriguez WJ, McCracken GH, Jr. et al (1988) Consensus: management of Salmonella infection in the first year of life. Pediatr Infect Dis J 7:615–621 Voltersvik P, Halstensen A, Langeland N, Digranes A, Peterson LE, Rolstad T et al (2000) Eradication of non-typhoid salmonellae in acute enteritis after therapy with ofloxacin for 5 or 10 days. J Antimicrob Chemother 46:457–459 Stoycheva MV, Murdjeva MA (2006) Antimicrobial therapy of salmonelloses–current state and perspectives. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 48:5–10 Tsai MH, Huang YC, Lin TY, Huang YL, Kuo CC, Chiu CH (2011) Reappraisal of parenteral antimicrobial therapy for nontyphoidal Salmonella enteric infection in children. Clin Microbiol Infect 17:300–305 Onwuezobe IA, Oshun PO (2008) Antbiotics for treating nontyphoidal Salmonella diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev Sirinavin S, Thavornnunth J, Sakchainanont B, Bangtrakulnonth A, Chongthawonsatid S, Junumporn S (2003) Norfloxacin and azithromycin for treatment of nontyphoidal salmonella carriers. Clin Infect Dis 37:685–691 Zavala Trujillo I, Quiroz C, Gutierrez MA, Arias J, Renteria M (1991) Fluoroquinolones in the treatment of typhoid fever and the carrier state. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 10:334–341 Nelson MR, Shanson DC, Hawkins DA, Gazzard BG (1992) Salmonella, Campylobacter and Shigella in HIV-seropositive patients. AIDS (London, England) 6:1495–1498 Kaplan JE, Benson C, Holmes KH, Brooks JT, Pau A, Masur H et al (2009) Guidelines for prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIVinfected adults and adolescents: recommendations from CDC, the National Institutes of Health, and the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Recomm Rep 58:1–207, (quiz CE1–4) Roberts C, Wilkins EG (1987) Salmonella screening of pregnant women. J Hosp Infect 10:67–72 Schloesser RL, Schaefer V, Groll AH (2004) Fatal transplacental infection with non–typhoidal Salmonella. Scand J Infect Dis 36:773–774 Cooke FJ, Ginwalla S, Hampton MD, Wain J, RossRussell R, Lever A et al (2009) Report of neonatal meningitis due to Salmonella enterica serotype Agona and review of breast milk-associated neonatal Salmonella infections. J Clin Microbiol 47:3045–3049 Cahill SM, Wachsmuth K, Costarrica M, Embarek P (2008) Powdered Infant Formula as a Source of Salmonella Infection in Infants. Clin Infect Dis 46:268–273 25 77. Van Der Klooster JM, Roelofs HJ (1997) Management of Salmonella infections during pregnancy and puerperium. Neth J Med 51:83–86 78. Varma JK, Molbak K, Barrett TJ, Beebe JL, Jones TF, Rabatsky-Ehr T et al (2005) Antimicrobial– resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella is associated with excess bloodstream infections and hospitalizations. J Infect Dis 191:554–561 79. Su L-H, Chiu C-H, Chu C, Ou JT (2004) Antimicrobial resistance in nontyphoid Salmonella serotypes: a global challenge. Clin Infect Dis 39:546–551 80. Parry CM, Threlfall EJ (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in typhoidal and nontyphoidal salmonellae. Curr Opin Infect Dis 21:531–538 81. Angulo FJ, Johnson KR, Tauxe RV, Cohen ML (2000) Origins and consequences of antimicrobialresistant nontyphoidal Salmonella: implications for the use of fluoroquinolones in food animals. Microb Drug Resist (Larchmont, NY) 6:77–83 82. Crump JA, Medalla FM, Joyce KW, Krueger AL, Hoekstra RM, Whichard JM et al (2011) Antimicrobial resistance among invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica isolates in the United States: National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, 1996–2007. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:1148–1154 83. Meakins S, Fisher IST, Berghold C, Gerner-Smidt P, Tschape H, Cormican M et al (2008) Antimicrobial drug resistance in human nontyphoidal Salmonella isolates in Europe 2000–2004: a report from the Enter-net International Surveillance Network. Microb Drug Resist (Larchmont, NY) 14:31–35 84. Reddy EA, Shaw AV, Crump JA (2010) Communityacquired bloodstream infections in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 10:417–432 85. Nordmann P, Poirel L, Mak JK, White PA, McIver CJ, Taylor P (2008) Multidrug-resistant Salmonella strains expressing emerging antibiotic resistance determinants. Clin Infect Dis 46:324–325 86. Miriagou V, Tzouvelekis LS, Rossiter S, Tzelepi E, Angulo FJ, Whichard JM (2003) Imipenem resistance in a Salmonella clinical strain due to plasmid-mediated class A carbapenemase KPC-2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:1297–1300 87. Hakanen A, Kotilainen P, Jalava J, Siitonen A, Huovinen P (1999) Detection of decreased fluoroquinolone susceptibility in Salmonellas and validation of nalidixic acid screening test. J Clin Microbiol 37:3572–3577 88. Hakanen AJ, Lindgren M, Huovinen P, Jalava J, Siitonen A, Kotilainen P (2005) New quinolone resistance phenomenon in Salmonella enterica: nalidixic acid-susceptible isolates with reduced fluoroquinolone susceptibility. J Clin Microbiol 43:5775–5778 89. Chorba TL, Meriwether RA, Jenkins BR, Gunn RA, MacCormack JN (1987) Control of a non-foodborne outbreak of salmonellosis: day care in isolation. Am J Public Health 77:979–981 26 90. Tauxe RV, Hassan LF, Findeisen KO, Sharrar RG, Blake PA (1988) Salmonellosis in nurses: lack of transmission to patients. J Infect Dis 157:370–373 91. (1987) Food handlers and salmonella food poisoning Lancet 2:606–607 92. Kassis I, Dagan R, Chipman M, Alkan M, Simo A, Gorodischer R (1990) The use of prophylactic furazolidone to control a nosocomial epidemic of multiply resistant Salmonella typhimurium in pediatric wards. Pediatr Infect Dis J 9:551–555 93. Dyson C, Ribeiro CD, Westmoreland D (1995) Large scale use of ciprofloxacin in the control of a Salmonella outbreak in a hospital for the mentally handicapped. J Hosp Infect 29:287–296 G. M. Haeusler and N. Curtis 94. Linnemann CC, Jr., Cannon CG, Staneck JL, McNeely BL (1985) Prolonged hospital epidemic of salmonellosis: use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for control. Infection control: IC 6:221–225 95. Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L (2007) Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) 96. NHMRC (2010) Australian Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare. Commonwealth of Australia 1–262 http://www.springer.com/978-1-4614-4725-2
© Copyright 2024