1. travel
2. tourist destinations
3. australia and new zealand

AuPS News
President
Prof Graham Lamb
La Trobe University
[email protected]
National Secretary
Prof Matthew Watt
Monash University
[email protected]
Treasurer
Dr Bradley Launikonis
University of Queensland
[email protected]
Editor
Prof. David Allen
The University of Sydney
[email protected]
IT Manager & Production
Editor
Hon A/Prof Dave Davey
[email protected]
Webmaster & Assoc Editor
Dr Glenn Wadley
Deakin University
[email protected]
[email protected]
Student Representatives
Tahnee Kennedy
The University of Melbourne
[email protected]
du.au
Nicole Vargas
Charles Sturt University
[email protected]
Councillors
Dr James Bell
The University of Melbourne
[email protected]
Prof Lea Delbridge
The University of Melbourne
[email protected]
Prof Aaron Russell
Deakin University
[email protected]
Dr Deanne Skelly (nee Hryciw)
The University of Melbourne
[email protected]
Dr Robert Lee-Young
Baker Heart & Diabetes Inst.
[email protected]
Public Officer
AuPS Secretary
AuPS Website
June 2015
Michael Roberts Education Award
Winner 2014
Dr Deanne Skelly
What is your background in physiology
education and research?
After completing my undergraduate and
honours degree at the University of
Adelaide, I was fortunate to meet
Professor Allan Bretag (University of
South Australia). He actively encouraged
me to join his laboratory and undertake a
PhD with him in 1995. His research was
focused on chloride ion channels and the
investigation of the relationship between
their structure and function. We regularly
had lab meetings with his collaborators
Professor Michael Roberts and Associate
Professor Grigori Rychkov. It was at my
first lab meeting that I met Michael
Roberts. This was in the mid-1990s, and
what I remember of Michael was that he
had this ability to make you feel welcome,
and valued.
Following the completion of my PhD, I was fortunate to be appointed as a
Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University working with Professor William
Guggino (in 1999). This was a stimulating and exciting time. While I was in
Baltimore I was appointed as a lecturer teaching a subject for the Masters in
Biotechnology course. Following my long days in the lab, each Thursday evening, I
would teach a class of mature students, most of who were working in laboratories
around Baltimore. I enjoyed this, immensely, and vowed to continue teaching when
I returned to Australia.
In 2001, at a conference at the Gold Coast, I met my mentor and now collaborator
Professor Philip Poronnik. I joined Phil’s lab at The University of Sydney and then
the University of Queensland in 2002. Phil is a well-rounded academic who has
strengths in both educational research and scientific research. Everything Phil does
is with passion. He knew of my love of teaching, and he actively encouraged me to
undertake a Graduate Certificate in Higher Education at The University of
Queensland (which I completed in 2005). I think it is important for scientists to have
some training in education, as communicating your research findings is not the
same as teaching and actively engaging a class of 500 students! While undertaking
my Graduate Certificate, I developed a keen interest in scientific communication.
This has involved projects where students “translate” scientific data into a laypersons language. An area that I think requires more development in the
undergraduate student, is the ability to understand scientific language, and be able
to communicate this to people with limited scientific backgrounds.
The Australian Physiological Society is an Incorporated Association in the State of Victoria. Reg. No. A0021266A
In 2008, I was appointed as a Lecturer at Victoria University. While at Victoria University I established
my own independent scientific research group, as well as continued to build my interests in educational
research. During this time, with my collaborator Dr Kathy Tangalakis, we developed a peer assisted
learning program, with members of the Learning Support Services at Victoria University. The
involvement of the Learning Support Services Group was critical to ensuring that the program was
valid, and built soundly on the principals of educational research. This was highly successful, and is still
in use at Victoria University today. This project reminded me of the diversity of our student cohorts, as
well as the need to utilise peer networks in promoting good study practices.
In 2012 I was appointed as a Lecturer at The University of Melbourne. Here, I am continuing with my
passions in both educational research and scientific research. Again, I am focused on methods for
enhancing scientific communication in undergraduate students. I foster the view that an active and
dynamic environment promotes effective learning, and that student engagement is a key aspect of any
undergraduate degree. Importantly I am still working on methods to enhance scientific communication in
my students, and develop in them a passion for scientific enquiry.
My service to the field of educational research has resulted in my organisation of the Teaching
symposium associated with the AuPS meeting in Geelong (co-chair of the session), as well as assistance
with the pre-conference workshop on education. My educational research has also been presented both
nationally and internationally, across a number of forums. I am also an assistant editor for the World
Journal of Education, and regularly provide peer review on manuscripts from all over the world.
Where does physiology education need to head in the next 5 years?
I believe that engagement of students with Physiological concepts and their relevance to real world
scenarios is key to developing and promoting the field of Physiology. It is imperative that students
understand that their current knowledge is based on enquiry and critical scholarship. I believe that to
educate well in Physiology, one must have current, firsthand knowledge of the way science evolves, to
provide students with genuine experience and knowledge. In essence I aim to encourage a sense of
curiosity in the biological world, which is essential for the future advancement of our discipline. I am
proud to be an active scientific and educational researcher. My mentor Phil Poronnik encouraged me to
become a balanced academic with strengths and passions in both areas, which is what I am achieving.
One area that requires consideration for the future is the nature of face-to-face education. With the
explosion of on-line learning, students can do a large amount of their study in a virtual world. We must
ensure that they see benefit in attending class, through a genuine, valued experience that engages them
with the content.
It was a great honour to win the Michael Roberts award last year, and it was especially pleasing that my
former PhD supervisor Professor Allan Bretag was in the room. I am greatly appreciative that the AuPS
has recognised my contributions to the field of educational research, while I maintain my strong interests
in both educational and scientific research. I believe that you can be a balanced academic, with interests
in both education and scientific research, so long as you have the passion to do so.
Deanne was awarded The Michael Roberts Excellence in Physiology Education prize at
the AuPS 2014 Scientific Meeting. Deanne will present the Roberts Award Lecture at the
2015 AuPS meeting in Hobart. Nominations for the 2015 Roberts award will be opening
soon, and will close in October. Please keep an eye on the AuPS website for more
details.
-2-
Mid-year update from AuPS National Secretary
The successful running of the AuPS annual meeting in Brisbane capped off a busy 2014. The
attendance was terrific, the science was outstanding and the organisation by Brad Launikonis
and his team was seamless.
We welcomed Aaron Russell and Lea Delbridge to Council and farewelled Nikki Beard and
David Saint, who we thank for their contribution to the running of the Society. Specifically, Nikki
contributed to developing relationships with new sponsors of the AuPS and David was heavily
involved with education-based activities.
Robyn Murphy and Aaron Russell attended the ‘Science Meets Parliament’ event as the AuPS
representatives and have reported on their experiences in this newsletter.
The AuPS implemented a gender equity statement in 2015, which was triggered by the
growing awareness of issues pertaining to gender inequities in science and the implementation
of similar statements / policies at several major scientific bodies and institutions. The policy
reads, “The AuPS strives to achieve gender equity in all aspects of the Society's activities. The
Society endeavours to achieve this equity through female and male representation on Council,
conference organising committees, session chairs at scientific meetings as well as through
invitations to high quality speakers of both sexes in line with the gender balance in our
Society.” Statistics which accompany the statement can be viewed on the AuPS website. This
took considerable work and careful consideration, and together we will strive to ensure fair
representation within the AuPS.
Looking forward, the 2015 annual scientific meeting will be a joint venture hosted by the
University of Tasmania’s Faculty of Health and the Menzies Institute for Medical Research.
This will be held from Sunday 29th November to Wednesday 2rd December. Steve Rattigan
and his local organizing committee have put together a terrific program that includes 11
International speakers and provides representation across most of the major interest groups of
the Society. The plenary speakers are world leaders in their disciplines and include Prof.
Stefan Broer (ANU) and Prof. Bret Goodpaster (Burnham Medical Research Institute, Orlando,
USA). The final details of the program are being finalized but I can say that the conference
dinner, which is included in the cost of registration, will be held at the world famous Museum of
Old and New Art (MONA), which will be reached by river cruise. In keeping with the format of
previous years, we will once again take the opportunity to present a number of our annual
prizes during the dinner. These include presentation of the Michael Roberts Teaching Award,
AK McIntyre Award, the Post-Doctoral and PhD publication prizes. The call for applicants for
these prizes will be made in August and September. Further details of the meeting are on the
website and also detailed in this Newsletter.
We are forward planning for the 2016 AuPS meeting, which will be held in Adelaide. The local
organising committee headed by Janna Morrison, David Saint and Damien Keating is currently
busy sourcing potential venues. We are hoping to make this a joint meeting and are in
discussions for a future date. The call for symposia for Adelaide 2016 will be made in August
this year, with submissions likely to be closed around the end of October.
Good luck with the grant rebuttals and I look forward to seeing as many of you as possible at
Hobart 2015.
Matthew Watt
AuPS National Secretary
-3-
Science meets Parliament
24 and 25 March, 2015. Canberra
By Robyn Murphy (La Trobe University) and Aaron Russell (Deakin University)
For about the past 20 years, the peak body in science and technology, Science & Technology Australia
(STA, formally the Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies FASTS) has held
‘Science meets Parliament’ (SmP). One of the main aims of STA is to keep science on the national
agenda, and this two day conference provided exposure of the nation’s parliament for 200 delegates,
representing diverse sciences such as physiology, plant ecology through to quantum physics and
astronomy. This year we represented the AUPS at SmP.
The first day of SmP was at the Canberra Convention Centre. It was focused on preparing delegates
to meet with their allocated parliamentarian the following day. From the outset, it helped to define the
role of a politician and to understand they are people making difficult decisions about complex matters.
The other piece of information that resonated was that politicians are genuinely interested in science,
BUT, they have to make economic decisions. The two days helped us understand this reality. During
the first day, we received insight from journalists (now do they work a busy schedule or what! another
article in itself), lobbyists, policy advisors. This concluded with an interactive session of science
communication where we were required to “sell” our scientific research within 60 seconds. This was
important to be able to do, because even though we were allocated 15-45 min with a dedicated
politician, the dynamic world of politics and potential bell ringing (meaning the senate must return to the
house to vote) meant your captive audience could be lost as quickly as you stepped foot in the door.
We were reminded that scientists think and write in a unique way. Many others just never get on the
same page as us and this is where due consideration can pay off. We were taught the “…….and ….but
…therefore……..” style, which can turn a finding of interest into a story with meaning – and all in 60
seconds or less. Basically, cut away the fluff and definitely cut out all the detail. It was excellent to
have some practice of this new craft before the real deal in Parliament House.
During the course of the first day, the gap between thinking like a scientist (easily done) and
understanding how a parliamentarian thinks (harder to do) narrowed. In fact, one awakening was to
appreciate that even if they wanted to, politicians cannot think like a scientist when making their
decisions and doing their job. Another realisation was that overall, politicians believe in the absolute
importance of undertaking scientific endeavour. Their difficulty is in keeping to budget and appeasing
the people they represent. Did you know that on a list of priorities based on the general population,
science comes in at a lowly 8th! Perhaps that explains our lowly rank compared to other OECD
countries and their relative dollars spent on science and innovation. Top of the list of importance by the
public was the Economy, followed by Health and then Education. That priority list demonstrates the
importance of ensuring our discussions with politicians address these factors and don’t just try to sell
the science! Nobel Laureate, Brian Schmidt AC reminded us that despite this, it is still our job to keep
raising the profile of science to ensure that politicians and the public continue to care. To keep science
in the public view requires persistence, and hence time, and to do so we must remain highly informed
and highly engaged.
Pre-dinner drinks, Foyer, Parliament House.
-4-
Delegates had a couple of opportunities to meet with politicians. Informally, this took place at the Gala
dinner that was held in the Great Hall of Parliament House on our first evening. In amongst eating a
lovely dinner, we listened to various presentations including by The Hon Ian MacFarlane, Minister for
Industry and Science and The Hon Bill Shorten, Leader of the Opposition and were entertained by MC
Adam Spencer. There was barely an eyelid batted at the sea of individuals gently rising and exiting the
Great Hall amidst the speeches, as the senate bell rang on a couple of occasions. Once the formalities
were over the Hall was amass with people mingling and ‘pick the politician’ began. It provided an
informal setting to grab an opportunity to say a few words of importance and perhaps take a selfie
(Robyn was happy with hers, below).
The Hon Bill Shorten and
Robyn Murphy
Science meets Parliament was a great experience, the first time we’ve received such insight into how
politicians think and what is required for them to go about their business. Being in parliament just for a
night and a day was very special. On the second day we had the unique opportunity to discuss matters
with Politicians. We went in small groups (2-3 of us; 6 handpicked young scientists also had an
impromptu meeting with the Prime Minister) to meet privately with a nominated politician for 15-45 min.
We both met with insightful, intelligent, passionate and extremely hard-working and busy Senators. Not
everyone had fantastic meetings with their respective politician, however most were pleasantly, and
sometimes passionately rewarded.
From our experience at SmP there were several take home messages. Our various jobs demand us to
think in particular ways, however our ability to communicate this meaningfully is vital. In order to speak
together, there is a need to understand how information can be disseminated from one brain to another
– both very intelligent, but likely processing and understanding the information in a very different way.
For example, the job of a policy maker is decision-making, yet our job as scientists is to create
knowledge. This is further demonstrated with a quote by Christine Livingston, President of the
Business Council of Australia that helped put that one into perspective. “I hear, I forget. I see, I
remember. I do, I understand”. We as scientists do a lot, and understand what we do. If we tell
someone the details of our work, they are likely to forget. If they see something, it will help them
remember, but understanding it might be outside the realm of what is possible. There were a few other
key quotes that resonated various aspects of the scientist trying to edge into the eyes and ears of a
politicians. A take home quote from Hugh White AO, Professor of Strategic Studies, ANU was “If
you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu.” Perhaps apt incentive if you want to make change.
-5-
There was so much more to SmP, so many insightful, good, pragmatic things said by an array of
impressive speakers. The one thing that we can share confidently, is the need for scientists to be able
to articulate what they do, why they do it and who should care about what is done. The Hon. Kim Carr
made the point that we, as scientists, all share the need to be more retail – to make what we do
relevant to the general public. Get that mantra correct in our heads will be equipping ourselves well for
the discussions with non-scientists. We say, “Try this one at home”, the 60 second “……..and ……..but
………. therefore …….” mantra, and see how you go!
Further information
If you are interested in learning a little more about SmP, or about STA, more information can be found
on the STA website. There are links to many of the speeches and presentations we listened to. If you
have the opportunity to attend in the future then we believe that it is a worthwhile experience.
Opportunities will more likely avail themselves to active members. Also, if you would like to read some
other personal accounts of SmP, there are others available via the STA website. One that we liked in
particular is an article for The Conversation by Dr Olivia Carter.
Parliament House at sunrise. Photos by Robyn Murphy
-6-
Student Profile – Enyuan Cao
Monash University
What is your research background
– how did you get interested in
Physiology?
I received my Bachelor degree in
Pharmacy at the Monash Institute of
Pharmaceutical Sciences. I initially
became interested in research during
undergraduate work experience in the
lab. I then completed one year
honours
research
training,
in
collaboration with AstraZeneca in
Sweden, aimed to enhance the
pharmacological effect of immunemodulators by targeted drug delivery
to lymphatic lymphocytes. Since the
start of my honours year, I knew I
wanted to pursue a PhD working on
lymphatic function and its relation to
immune
diseases,
which
later
became my PhD project focusing on
intestinal lymph-adipose interactions in immuno-metabolic diseases.
What was your award winning poster?
My poster, ‘The impact of intestinal lymph exposure on adipocyte function and insulin
resistance’, was the exciting start of my PhD project. In this study we found that intestinal
lymph exposure (especially high fat diet fed lymph) to adipocytes alters adipocyte
differentiation, lipid storage, morphology and secretory profile in vitro. These collective
changes in adipocytes were consistent with pathogenic changes that promote insulin
resistance (IR) in vivo. This study is the first step to establish the potential link between
intestinal lymph access to adipose, adipose function and whole body IR development.
What do you do to relax?
I enjoy watching movies and movie commentaries. I also like painting and sketching.
What is the research direction you would like to take in the next 3-5 years?
Immune and metabolic dysfunctions promote the development of almost all chronic diseases.
In the future, I would like to continue working to broaden our understanding of lymphatic
function in immune-metabolic changes and chronic disease, and explore potential lymphdirected treatment strategies for these diseases.
Enyuan was awarded the SDR best poster prize at the AuPS 2014 Scientific Meeting in
Brisbane.
-7-
Research Symposia (with over 11 international speakers!)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine
Novel mechanisms that regulate the physiological attributes of muscle
The sarcoplasmic reticulum of skeletal muscle
Linking mitochondria with health and disease
Controlling the excitable heart
SERCA and NaK properties and regulation in skeletal muscle
Cardiovascular metabolo-pathology
Age, sex and cardiovascular protection strategies
New Insights into exercise-induced mitochondrial adaptations
Sex-specific effects of programming: how gender plays a role in determining your disease risk.
Physiological mechanisms controlling microvascular flow and muscle metabolism
Lipid Metabolism in Health & Disease – novel techniques to assess lipids
•
What do we want our physiology graduates to know and be able to do?
Physiology Education Symposium
•
AuPS Invited Plenary Lecturer: Prof Stefan Broer, Australian National University.
Amino acid transport - translating basic discovery into improving health
Invited Plenary Speaker: Prof Bret Goodpaster, Sanford Burnham Medical Research Institute
Roberts Education Prize Lecturer: Dr Deanne Skelly, The University of Melbourne.
Conference Dinner: MONA: Museum of Old and New Art
Local contact: Prof Stephen Rattigan [email protected]
Meeting website
-8-
We are pleased to announce that Registration and Abstract submission are open for;
Brain Transporters: From Genes and Genetic Disorders to Function and Drug Discovery.
This 3 day meeting will be held from Aug 20th -23rd in Palm Cove and is a satellite meeting to the
International Society for Neurochemistry meeting in Cairns (23-27 August). This will be wonderful
opportunity to see some of the leading researchers in the field of Brain Transporters speak in Australia.
There are additional speaking slots reserved for Australian Speakers and also for Young Investigators.
Students and Early Career Researchers are particularly encouraged to attend.
Confirmed speakers include;
Susan Amara
NIMH
Phil Beart
University of Melbourne
Randy Blakely
Vanderbilt University
Olga Boudker
Cornell University
Lynette Daws
University of Texas
Volker Eulenburg University of Erlangen
Ulrik Gether
University of Copenhagen
Mike Kavanaugh
Joe Mindell
Arturo Ortega
Mike Robinson
Connie Sanchez
Rebecca Seal
Ji Sze
University of Montana
NINDS/NIH
CINVESTAV-IPN Mexico City
University of Pennsylvania
Lundbeck
University of Pittsburgh
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Registration Fees: Before Mar 30, 2015
Researcher/Academic $250
Post Doc
$225
Student
$175
Social Guest
$125
Registration Fees: After Mar 30, 2015
Researcher/Academic $350
Post Doc
$325
Student
$275
Palm Cove is situated 30 minutes north of Cairns and 40mins south of Port Douglas. It is
approximately 20 minutes from Cairns International & Domestic Airport.
We hope to see you in Palm Cove.
Organising Committee: Robert Vandenberg, Renae Ryan and Stefan Broer. Program Committee:
Rob Vandenberg, Renae Ryan, Stefan Broer, Randy Blakely, Mike Robinson, Arturo Ortega and Phil
Beart
-9-
- 10 -
ISCCB 2015
18th International Symposium on Chromaffin Cell Biology
August 17-21, 2015 | The Pullman Reef Casino Hotel, Cairns
On behalf of the organising committee, it is our great pleasure to invite you to register for ISCCB 2015. onLine registration is now open.
Invited speakers include: Nobel Laureate Erwin Neher | Nils Brose | Mike Cousin | Peter Dunkley | Lee
Eiden | Anna Fejtova | Volker Haucke | Ron Holz | Richard Huganir | Reinhard Jahn |Michael Kozlov | Manfred
Lindau | Tom Martin | Jens Rettig | Josep Rizo | Phil Robinson |Ruediger Rudolf | Corey Smith | Jakob
Sorensen | Matthijs Verhage | Ling-Gang Wu | Tao Xu | Robert Zorec and many more.
There are still plenty of slots available in sessions and in The famed "Wine and Cheese" sessions for
talks selected from abstracts. Poster sessions will also be held and are classically highly interactive.
Early Bird registration closes June 1 and please visit the website and register online as soon as
possible to help us organise the event.
Exhibition and Sponsorship packages are noted on the website. The Exhibition is held together with the
Poster displays and refreshments in the Urchin Rooms. Exhibitors are invited to present in the Wine
And Cheese Session. ISCCB 2015 precedes the ISN 2015 Meeting in Cairns.
Social events include a Welcome Reception and Conference Dinner. Excursions to the World Heritage
listed Great Barrier Reef and Daintree Rainforest will be offered for the Thursday excursion day and as
pre/post touring options. Note that the excursion is not included in the registration. However, an email
with all the details of the excursion will be sent to you upon registration.
We look forward to welcoming you to beautiful Cairns for the exciting 18th ISCCB.
Best wishes
Fred Meunier and Damien Keating
Convenors
TOPICS INCLUDE
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
exocytosis
endocytosis
neurotransmission
secretory granule formation
and trafficking
calcium regulation
stress signals and
physiology
hypertension and
neuroendocrine tumor
biology
SPEAKERS
Speakers are noted in
theprogram and in the
onlineSpeaker Blurbs.
We are delighted to
welcome an eminent
group of presenters to the
Cairns Symposium.
REGISTRATION and
ABSTRACTSUBMISSION
Submit your abstract onLine with registration.
Please book your
accommodation at the
conference hotel, onLinewith registration.
EXHIBITION and
SPONSORSHIP
Invitation and exhibition
options here.
ISCCB 2015 SECRETARIAT
MTCi | PO Box 717 Caringbah, Sydney | NSW 1495 | Australia
Tel: +61 2 9524 1799 | Mobile/Cell: +61 419 688 581 | [email protected]
- 11 -
Brisbane 2014 AuPS Meeting
The University of Queensland, 30 November to 3 December 2014
Was proudly sponsored by:
Aurora Scientific Inc. is a leading science and technology firm providing high performance
measurement instrumentation to a niche market of scientific researchers in over 33 countries around
the world. Their 300 Series Muscle Levers and High-Speed Length Controllers, 400 Series Force
Transducers, 600 Series Data Acquisition Hardware and Software, 700 Series Electrical
Stimulators and 800 Series Test Apparatus are used to investigate varied areas of scientific inquiry
including heart and stroke research, exercise physiology, injury recovery and adaptation and neuromuscular disease progression. ASI’s 500 Series line includes micro-seismic transmitters and data
loggers as well as data acquisition and analysis capabilities for ground penetrating radar with
applications in the mining industry. ASI’s100 and 200 Series of Fast-Response Gas Sensors provide
solutions to neuroscience researchers and to military and environmental specialists. ASI has offices in
Canada, Ireland and Hong Kong and a distributor in Japan. For more information about Aurora
Scientific Inc., visit www.AuroraScientific.com or call: in Australia and New Zealand +852-3188-9946.
ADInstruments has empowered physiologists to fast-track life changing research and inspired teachers
to make a difference to student learning. Get the latest on our complete solutions for data acquisition
and analysis at AuPS including latest LabChart software, NIBP system, wireless EMG and more.
- 12 -
AuPS Supporters
This issue of AuPS News was compiled by Glenn Wadley and with many thanks to the
generous contributors.
The next issue of AuPS News will be distributed to members in September 2015.
All contributions for AuPS News should be sent to: [email protected] before the end
of August.
- 13 -