Robert A. Kyle - Sat - Presentation

Multiple Myeloma
9th Annual Living with Myeloma Conference
25 Years of Progress in Myeloma Therapy
Scottsdale, AZ
March 21, 2015
Robert A. Kyle, MD
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Scottsdale, Arizona
Rochester, Minnesota
Jacksonville, Florida
CP1123175-1
Disclosures for Robert A. Kyle
Johnson & Johnson
Disease Monitoring Committee
Celgene
Disease Monitoring Committees
Novartis
Disease Monitoring Boards
Merck
Data Monitoring Committee
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Independent Monitoring Committee
Aeterna Zentaris (Keryx)
Data & Safety Monitoring Board
Onyx
Data Monitoring Committee
Binding Site
Honoraria
Pharmacyclics
Data Safety Monitoring Board
Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
L-sarcolysin (L-phenylalanine
mustard) (Melphalan) (Alkeran)
Blokhin et al, 1958
Bersagel et al, 1962
Multiple Myeloma
Single (M/P) vs Combination
Chemotherapy (CCT)
n=4,930 (20 trials)
Therapy
Response (%)
M/P
53
CCT
60
P<0.00001
No difference in survival
No subsets with benefit
CP1123175-33
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant
• Plasma cell leukemia
• Melphalan 140 mg/m2 IV with good
response
• Collected stem cells
• Relapsed and given Melphalan 140 mg/m2
IV plus stem cells
• Treated 8 myeloma patients
McElwain TJ, Powles RL. Lancet 1983 Oct 8;2(8354):822-4.
Novel Agents
• Thalidomide
• Bortezomib (Velcade)
• Lenalidomide (Revlimid)
mSMART 2.0: Classification of Active MM
High-Risk
 FISHc
 Del 17p
 t(14;16)
 t(14;20)
 GEP
High risk
signature
Intermediate-Riska
 FISH
 t(4;14)d
 1q gain
 Complex karyotype
 Metaphase
Deletion 13 or
hypodiploidy
Standard-Riska,b
All others including:
 Trisomies
 t(11;14)e
 t(6;14)
 High PC S-phasef
a Note that a subset of patients with these factors will be classified as high-risk by GEP
b LDH >ULN and beta-2 M > 5.5 may indicate worse prognosis; cTrisomies may ameliorate
d
Prognosis is worse when associated with high beta-2 M and anemia
e t(11;14) may be associated with plasma cell leukemia; f Cut-offs vary
Dispenzieri et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82:323-341; Kumar et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2009 84:1095-1110; Mikhael et al. Mayo Clin
Proc 2013;88:360-376. v12 //last reviewed March 2014
Multiple Myeloma
Autologous Transplant Eligibility
• Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma with
CRAB
• Age (physiologic) < 70
• Performance status (0-2)
• Bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL, creatinine ≤ 2.5
mg/dL & New York Heart Class I or II
• Adequate stem cells
• Concomitant diseases (heart, stroke,
etc.)
mSMART – Off-Study
Transplant Eligible
Standard-Risk
Intermediate-Risk
High-Risk
Trisomies
only
t 11;14, t 6;14,
Trisomies + IgH
t 4;14
4 cycles of Rda
4 cycles CyBorD
4 cycles of CyBorD
4 cycles of VRd
Autologous stem cell
transplant
Autologous stem cell
transplant, especially if
not in CR
Del 17p, t14;16,
t14;20
Collect Stem Cellsb
Autologous stem cell
transplant
Continue
c
Rd
2 cycles of Rd consolidation;
then Len maintenance if not
in VGPR but Len responsive*
Bor based therapy for
minimum of 1 year
a Bortezomib containing regimens preferred in renal failure or if rapid response
b If age >65 or > 4 cycles of Rd Consider G-CSF plus cytoxan or plerixafor
Bor or CyBorD for
minimum of 1 year
needed
c
Continuing Rd for patients responding to Rd and with low toxicities; Dex is usually discontinued after first year
* Consider risks and benefits; If used, consider limited duration 12-24 months
Dispenzieri et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82:323-341; Kumar et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2009 84:1095-1110; Mikhael et al. Mayo Clin
Proc 2013;88:360-376. v12 //last reviewed March 2014
Multiple Myeloma
Is maintenance therapy necessary
after autologous stem cell
transplant (high dose therapy)?
Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
Transplant Eligible
< 65 years
N=273
Induction (4 mos)
N=399
Lenalidomide 25 mg
days 1-21 plus dex
40, day 1, 8, 15, 22
Consolidation
N=273
PFS
mos
OS
4 yr
%
Transplant
vs
MPR (6 mos)
43
82
22
65
P = < 0.001
P=0.02
Palumbo et al., NEJM 371:895, 2014
Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
Maintenance
After Transplant
N=141
Maintenance
(Revlimid)
No maintenance
PFS*
mos
OS**
3 yr
%
42
88
22
79
*P = < 0.001
**P = 0.14
Palumbo et al., NEJM 371: 895, 2014
mSMART – Off-Study
Transplant Ineligible
Standard-Risk
Intermediate-Risk
High-Risk
Trisomies
only
t 11;14, t 6;14,
Trisomies + IgH
t 4;14
Del 17p, t14;16,
t14;20
Rd a, b
Weekly CyBorD for ~12
months c
Weekly CyBorD for ~12
months c
VRd* for ~12 months
Until progression d
Followed by
observation
Bor-based therapy
maintenance for
minimum of 1 year
Bor as maintenance for
minimum of 1 year
a In
patients treated with Rd, continuing treatment is an option for patients responding well with low toxicities; Dex is
usually discontinued after first year
b Bortezomib containing regimens preferred in renal failure or if rapid response needed
c CyBorD is considered a less toxic variation of VMP; VMP can be used as alternative
d Continuing Rd for patients responding to Rd and with low toxicities; Dex is usually discontinued after first year
*Clinical trials strongly recommended as the first option
Dispenzieri et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82:323-341; Kumar et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2009 84:1095-1110; Mikhael et al. Mayo Clin
Proc 2013;88:360-376. v12 //last reviewed March 2014
Multiple Myeloma
Transplant Ineligible
Maintenance Therapy
MM015
N=459
PFS
MOS
OS
3 yr
%
Second Primary
malignancies
%
MPR-R
31
70
7
MPR (9 mos)
14
62
7
MP (9 mos)
13
66
3
Palumbo et al., N. Engl. J Med 366:1759, 2012
Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
Newly Diagnosed and > age 65
MM-015
N=459
MPR-R
MPR
MP
MPR-R vs MPR
MPR-R vs MP
PFS2
mos
OS
mos
40
54
52
55
29
HR .78
HR .70
Dimopoulos M. A., et al., Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts): 2013:122(21):
Abstract 405
Multiple Myeloma
Transplant Ineligible
020
N=1623
PFS
Mos
OS
4 yrs
%
MPR-R
25.5
59
MPR (18 mos)
MPT (18 mos)
20.7
21.2
56
51
Benboubker L. , Facon T., et al., NEJM 371:906, 2014.
Multiple Myeloma
Novel Agents
Pomalidomide (Pomalyst)
CC-4047
Carfilzomib (Kyprolis)
PR-171
Patients Refractory to LEN, and LEN + BORT
Best Overall Response
LEN and BORT
refractory*
POM
(n = 64)
POM + LoDEX
(n = 69)
ORR (≥ PR) %
16
30
CR %
2
0
VGPR
2
6
PR %
14
30
Median time to response, months
2.0
1.8
Median duration of response, months
8.3
6.5
*Refractory defined as progression while on the last LEN- or BORT containing regimen, or
within 60 days after the last dose of that therapy
Richardson et al., ASH 2011
Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
MM-003 – Rel/Ref
N=455
Pom + Dex
vs
302
≥ PR
%
31
Hi-Dex
153
10
N
PFS
mos
4.0
OS
mos
13
1.9
8
San Miguel J. F., et al., Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts):
2013:122(21): Abstract 686
Carfilzomib
Bortezomib-naïve
Cohort 1
20 mg/m2
(n=59)
Cohort 2
20/27 mg/m2
Bortezomib-naïve
(n=67)*
%
%
CR
3
2
VGPR
14
27
PR
25
24
42
52
12
16
Best Response
ORR (CR+VGPR+PR)
PD
*3 patients were not included as they did not have either baseline or post-baseline
assessment.
Vij et al., ASH 2011
Treatment of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
Carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone
N=792
≥ PR
CR
26.3
2 year
survival
%
73
87
32
17.6
65
67
9
PFS
(mos)
Carfilzomib
Plus
Lenalidomide
Plus
Dex
vs
Lenalidomide
Plus
Dex
Stewart AK et al., NEJM 372:142, 2015
Multiple Myeloma
Novel Agents
Monoclonal Antibodies (Daratumumab, SAR 650984)
Proteosome inhibitor (oral/IV)
MLN-9708 (Ixazomib)
Proteosome inhibitor (oral)
NPI-0052
Elotuzumab
Bendamustine
Histone deacetylase inhibitor
Vorinostat (SAHA)
Histone deacetylase inhibitor
Panobinostat
Measles Virotherapy
Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed and/or Refractory
N=20
Daratumumab
plus
Lenalidomide
plus
Dexamethasone
≥ PR
%
≥ VGPR
%
75
40
Plesner T. et al., Blood 124: #84, 2014
Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed/Refractory
N=31
SAR 650984
Plus
Lenalidomide
Plus
Dexamethasone
≥ PR
%
≥ VGPR
%
CR
%
65
26
26
Martin III TG, Blood 124, #83, 2014
Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
Untreated
Ixazomib Maintenance
N=50
Ixazomib d. 1, 8, 15
Plus
Lenalidomide d. 121
Plus
Dexamethasone d.
1, 8, 15
Ixazomib d. 1, 8, 15
q. 28 d.
(maintenance)
N=21
≥ PR
%
≥ VGPR
%
90
59
71%
CR
%
52%
Kumar S et al., Blood 124, #82, 2014
Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
Untreated
N=65
Ixazomib (MLN9708)
Ixazomib d 1, 8, 15
Plus
Lenalidomide d 1-21
Plus
Dexamethasone d 1, 8,
15, 22
≥ PR
≥ VGPR
1 yr OS
92%
58%
94%
Kumar SK, et al., Lancet Oncol 15:1503, 2014
[email protected]