saqarT velos mecn ierebaTa erovnu li ak ad em iis moam be, t. 9, #2, 2015 BULL ET IN OF THE GEORGIAN NATIONAL ACADEM Y OF SCIENCE S, vols. 9, no. 2, 2015 Management Investigation of moral leadership status and its relationship to the organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh town Farhad Nejad Irani*, Leila Dadashi** *Assistant Professor, Faculty Member, Department of Management and Human Science, Islamic Azad University , Bonab Branch ** Department of Management and Human Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Bonab Branch, Iran (responsible for correspondence) ABSTRACT. This study aims to determine moral leadership status and its relationship to the organizational accountability in public organizations in the city of Uromieh. Fry theoretical framework (2003) has used to measure moral leadership, and to measure organizational accountability, the theoretical framework developed by Ramzak (2005) has been used. This is a descriptive survey and correlational study in regard to its nature and method. The study population includes all employees of government organizations in the city of Uromieh as 8327 people, Cochran sampling formula is used to determine the sample size and to determine the sample size in the organization the stratified random sampling method is used. According to calculations, the sample size of 367 was calculated. Questionnaire was used to measure the variables. The validity and reliability of study has been confirmed. To measure the moral leadership , Fray questionnaire (2003) is used as a standard questionnaire and to measure organizational accountability ,the theoretical framework developed by Ramzak (2005) has been used. Since, some items of these questionnaires do not meet the conditions of Iranian organizations, so some changes imposed and a number of questions added to it in order to express the true situation in Iran. In order to analyze and classify data, the descriptive statistics were used. To check normality or abnormality of data, the Kolmogorov-Smyrnov test used and by using Pearson and Spearman correlation tests, the research hypotheses were examined to be confirmed or rejected. The Friedman test was used to rank the seven dimensions of moral leadership in terms of accountability, and to check the status of moral leadership, t-test was used. Descriptive analysis of all data has been done by SPSS software. According to the data analysis and results, the entire research hypothesis has been confirmed.© 2015 Bull. Georg. Natl.Acad. Sci. Key words: moral leadership, organizational accountability, public organizations in the city of Uromieh INTRODUCTION Phenomenon of uncertainty in the current era caused the organizations have proposed very different questions. One of the primary methods to encourage the current staff to deal with uncertainty is to wholeheartedly devote themselves to the work and by this way they will find their “self" completely in work! It is alleged that the outcome of this work is the creative and innovative employees in responding to the turbulent environments. This view is indefensible, because the main purpose of spirituality in organizations and work places is personal growth, not to deal with uncertainty in the environment. Today it seems the employees seek to something beyond material rewards in their activity anywhere (Kinjerski & Skrypnek, 2001).Studies shown that encouragement to the spirituality in the workplace can be lead to great advantages. The researchers state that encouragement to the spirituality in the workplace can lead to some advantages and benefits such as increased creativity (Freshman, 1999) , increased © 2015 Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88 L.Dadashi honesty, trust and accountability (Wenger Marsh & Conley, 1999), increasing the sense of self-development (Borak, 1999), and increased organizational commitment (Milliman et al, 2003) .According to Fray et al model, the theory of moral leadership is based on an intrinsic motivational model which make unity the values of leader and followers (eg, vision, faith, self- sacrifice love, create a common sense , being a loyal one to the organization ) to help the institutional community and productivity as outcomes of it (Fray et al., 2005, 835).This statement indicates that the spiritual leaders play an important role for the efficiency of the organization, and prevent the mental escape from work and trying to find a better moral path to their followers. Whether public staff, administrators and government officials intend to show that they are committed to the public interests, they must consider accountability as the top of their work. A common standard of public-centered services is to the extent of sensitivity which government shows against responsiveness to the public. Fredrickson consider some mechanisms such as public community, complaining of government organizations and arbitration - which represents the accountability tools - all compatible with the general theory of government management (Danaei Fard, 2009, 85).Meanwhile, in Iranian public organizations, there has not applied significant efforts about moral leadership as well as its relationship with increased institutional accountability. So, it is necessary to increase self-control, organizational commitment of employees, insight and conceptualizing in the organization, through increased organizational accountability by moral leadership. Perhaps no element is fundamental than accountability in the organization which in principle required people to be accountable and responsible against their actions and decisions, because , the lack of accountability caused any one will be able to do anything at any time which results in chaos and the collapse of the organization. Accountability system can be designed so that the behavior of individuals could be controlled in order to improve the purpose and effectiveness of the organization. In sum, the importance and necessity of spirituality in the organization is so high so that it can give the humanity to organizations, activity to the community and responsibility to environment and ultimately increase the organizational accountability (Nargesiyan, 2007, 2). It is necessary to perform some applicable and practical researches about the status of moral leadership and organizational accountability. To avoid such disadvantage, and development of situation, it should be increased the accountability in staff and one of indices which will increase the corporate accountability is moral leadership effect. In general, this study tried to answer the following main questions: which is the situation of moral leadership in public organizations in the city of Uromieh? What relationship is there between the status quo of moral leadership and organizational accountability in the city of Uromieh ? What is the priority ranking in respect of the relationship between moral leadership and organizational accountability in public organizations in the city of Uromieh? THEORY AND LITERATURE moral leadership Some management theorists tried to categorize the moral leadership to understand it more detail, Fray (2003) model divided moral leadership to seven dimensions. He considers it as including: 1) organizational perspective 2) altruism 3) faith and hope to work 4) membership 5) organizational commitment 6) productivity and continuous improvement. Organizational perspective: organizational compelling future vision for an organization that plays as an actuator role. Ii is in the future, not the present. Insight aims to discover and reveal the best among members. Altruism: It is the second dimension of moral leadership. It is love to all and without exception. Love and altruism makes people prefer to suffer themselves rather than others. Altruism is avoided the self- center (Fry, 2005, 835). Faith and hope to work: the third dimension is faith that people wait and hope for a positive future and it guarantees efforts through internal incentives. Members consider difficult goals and work hard and faith will help them to move forward (Fry, 2005, 835). Membership of the organization: Membership means that the organization understands its members and appreciates them, so staffs become the loyal members of it (Fry, 2005, 835). Organizational commitment: Actually, the moral leadership by creating the sense of organizational commitment in staffs caused to feel identity, loyalty and dependence in them , so staff introduce himself by his organization and desire to stay with organization. So it causes the staffs consider organization problems as their own and try to resolve them .Finally, if managers make trust staffs , this will increase the involvement of them in the organization (Ziaei et al., 2008, 75). Productivity and continuous improvement (performance feedback) : Finally , the moral leadership provide performance feedback of staffs by unofficial presentation of the daily performance of employees and also the official visits periodically. Therefore, the feedback function makes the employees aware during their work on a regular basis and finds their weaknesses of performance, strengthen their performance, consider their work quality and finally, go forward to improve organization by the information from the leaders of the organization (Ziaei et al., 2008, 75). Accountability Accountability is complex word, which presently become a common word accordingly. During few decades or before, this word was used in relatively limited concept. In most basic sense, it is responsiveness against a person, Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci., vols. 9, no. 2, 2015 Investigation of moral leadership status and its relationship to the organizational… 89 because of expected performance interpretation. Accountability is often a challenge for managers and even more than a challenge in reform era. It is possible to send and make the complex messages and communications for the staff about the great expectations. Accountability is judge of court which is distributed as praising in one hand and blaming on the other hand. It's a process that all members of the powers and duties should be responsible (Hiuze, 2001).Motavaseli defines accountability as right in just reaction against changes in interests and priorities over time, the need for changes in goals and in general it discusses the moving target (Motavaseli, 1994, 85). Accountability is a way to make the public trust (Alvani and Danaei, 2001).Accountability is a promoter force that makes pressure on key actors in order to be responsible in relation to their performance and be ensured from good performance of public services (Monavvarian, 2000, 160). Finally, the Mostafaei consider it as one of factor to publicize the administrative system (Mostafaei, 2004, 8).Some scientists try to understand this concept in detail, so categorized it as a model to four types: 1-organizational accountability: accountability to stakeholders and customers of organization 2-legal accountability: accountability to the legal authorities 3-profesional accountability: accountability to staff and managers 4-Political accountability (Faqihi, 2002). BACKGROUND 1. Fry and others (2006) conducted a study as moral leadership and organizational performance. According to findings of this study, since the vision, faith, altruism, membership, organizational commitment and performance feedback are different, the performance is also verified. So if employees of organizational management need performance level, they must concentrate their efforts on moral leadership values. In general, the results showed the significant positive correlation between organizational performance and dimensions of moral leadership. 2- A. Petrick, F. Quinn (2001), the article appearing under the title, the challenge response to leadership to unify the capacity as a strategic asset, defined the integration capacity as an intangible asset of an organization's strategy to challenge the accountability of leaders in order moved the leadership of the practical ways for business leaders designed to enhance competence and increase the integration capacity caused as an organizational strategic assets. 3-Zahedi And Chit Saz (2005), offered an article as the effect of implementing the management based patterns to meet the environmental requirements of state universities in Iran in order to understand and explain the use of patterns at the University and models to assess all aspects of this study to evaluate the efficacy of them in processing the universal principles of management, institutional competition, customer based, following the principles of the market, the central role of managers entrepreneurship and accountability and their success in achieving the strategic requirements such as organizational learning , good governance and strategic leadership is examined. According to the results, there is a direct relationship between universities flexibility in following the universal principles of strategic environmental management and influence by the management based patterns to respond the environment strategic requirements. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 1.Determine the status of moral leadership in public organizations in Uromieh. 2.Determine the type of relationship between moral leadership and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh .Determine the organizational perspective and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh Determine the relationship between altruism and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh Determine the relationship between organizational commitment and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh Determine the relationship between faith and hope to work and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh Determine the relationship between membership in organizations and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh Determine the significant relationship and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh Determine the relationship between productivity and organization improvement and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh 3.Determine the priority in relationship between moral leadership and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci., vols. 9, no. 2, 2015 90 L.Dadashi HYPOTHESIS 1.Status of moral leadership is above mean in public organizations in Urmia cit. 2.There is significant relationship between moral leadership and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh There is significant relationship between organization perspective and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh. There is significant relationship between altruism and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh There is significant relationship between organizational commitment and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh There is significant relationship between organization productivity and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh. There is significant relationship between hope and faith to work and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh There is significant relationship between organizational membership and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh. There is significant relationship between significancy and organizational accountability in public organizations in Uromieh. 3. There is significant difference between different dimensions of moral leadership in regard to the priority. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF ANALYTICAL MODEL The study is designed to evaluate the relationship between moral leadership and accountability in public organizations in Urmia city after study the literature, interviews with experts in the field of human resource management, the literature on the Internet, and obtaining the views of faculty members , then Fray theory (2003) considered in seven dimensions as theoretical framework of moral leadership including1)organizational perspective 2) altruism 3) faith and hope to work 4) membership 5) organizational commitment 6) productivity and continuous improvement.. And the Ramzek theory ( 2000) were used to study accountability. The accountability dimensions are as: 1-organizational accountability 2-legal accountability 3-profesional accountability 4-Political accountability, in order to study the relationship of each dimension of moral leadership and accountability of organization in public organizations in Urmia city(Faghihi, 2002, 138) ANALYTICAL MODEL Figure1: analytical model Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci., vols. 9, no. 2, 2015 91 Investigation of moral leadership status and its relationship to the organizational… METHODOLOGY This study is descriptive survey method and in purpose, is applied one. Survey is a method in social research is that beyond a certain technique to gather information. Although usually it is used a questionnaire, but other techniques such as Structured interview, observation and content analysis ... are used. Applied Research use researches based on theory, standards, principles and techniques developed in basic research to solve performance and actual problems. STATISTICAL POPULATION AND SAMPLE Statistical population of this research includes staff of public organizations in Uromieh city. Due to the obtained information , the number of employees are8 327 people including staffs in state departments (Education, Government, water and sewage, electricity, gas and telephone services, Roads and Urban Development, Agriculture, etc.) in Uromieh city.Stratified random sampling method was used in this study in any organization, so that after estimating the sample size based on the number of employees of government agencies, the number of samples for each government agency was determined as 367 people by Cochran formula. Data collecting tools In this study, the data collection method was library including books, magazines, internal and external articles, thesis and Internet also the field method using a questionnaire has been used to collect data to check hypothesis. And to collect data and test hypothesis ,a set of measurement tools designed to measure the research variables including two standard questionnaires that moral leadership questionnaires (Fray)consisting of 26 items and accountability questionnaire consisting of 24 items (Ramzak). Data analysis (Results) Data analysis from research using descriptive and inferential statistics was done as follows: Descriptive data of variables Table 1: Descriptive data of research variables productivity number mean Standard deviation mean mode SD variance skewness SD of skewness rank min max Moral leadership significance perspective commitment 763 7/7737 9/99685 763 2/7249 9/ 93979 763 2/93647 9/974697 membership 763 7/68599 9/996327 763 7/73949 9/992649 faith 763 7/29952 9/999459 763 7/74738 9/997947 altruism 763 7/7399 9/88247 accountability 763 2/99988 9/954989 2/9999 2/99 8/65923 4/342 9/372 9/843 5/9999 5/99 8/72634 8/ 982 9/472 9/849 2/9999 4/999 8/332946 7/823 9/327 9/843 7/9999 4/999 8/668932 4/364 9/772 9/849 2/99999 7/999 8/648974 4/649 9/357 9/843 7/99999 4/999 8/679676 4/959 8/787 9/843 2/99999 7/999 8/579279 4/579 9/368 9/843 7/9999 4/99 4/89756 2/372 8/956 9/843 5/99999 5/999 8/988927 8/942 9/937 9/843 9/99 5/99 3/99 87/99 9/999 7/999 3/999 4/999 3/999 7/999 9/999 2/999 3/999 7/999 9/99 6/99 6/999 85/999 89/99 74/99 9/999 6/999 3/999 7/999 9/999 82/99 46/999 In moral leadership variable, the number of samples, mean, median, standard deviation, skewness, elongation, minimum and maximum are calculated. According to the results obtained for the moral leadership variable, the mean is equal to 4/9428. In accountability variable, the number of samples, mean, median, standard deviation, skewness, elongation, minimum and maximum is calculated. The results of the extracted findings ( Table 1) shows that the mean is equal to 4/88011. • Statistical test of hypotheses In order to select appropriate statistical test to analyze the data, it is necessary to assess the distribution of data based on normal distribution by using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test in this case. The results are shown in Table 2. It must be noted that if the value of significance is greater than 0.05, the normality of the data will be accepted otherwise the abnormality of them will be accepted. Table 2: Kolmogorov-Smirnov test results to determine normality Variable distribution Moral leadership sig membership commitment landscape faith productivity accountability variables 763 9/827 9/884 normal 763 8/879 9/964 normal 763 8/846 9/892 normal 763 8/894 9/889 normal 763 8/878 9/969 normal 763 8/899 9/897 normal 763 4/978 9/993 abnormal 763 9/975 9/849 normal Number of data Kolmogorov Z sig normality As it is shown in the table above, except the productivity variable, the normality hypothesis of the data is accepted. For normal data distribution, the Pearson correlation test was used and for data abnormal distribution, Spearman Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci., vols. 9, no. 2, 2015 92 L.Dadashi correlation test was used. So due to the normality of all variables, the Pearson correlation test and Spearman correlation for abnormality were used to test research hypotheses. • Pearson Test Table 3: Pearson's r test to determine the correlation of moral leadership and its dimensions with organizational accountability confirmed or rejected Pearson correlation coefficient sig error organizational accountability confirmed confirmed confirmed 9/283 9/899 9/477 9/999 9/999 9/999 9/95 9/95 9/95 Moral leadership landscape altruism confirmed confirmed confirmed confirmed 9/463 9/482 9/472 5/653 9/999 9/999 9/999 5/555 9/95 9/95 9/95 5/50 commitment Faith and hope membership sig Table4: Spearman r test to determine the correlation between productivity, continuous improvement and accountability confirmed or rejected Pearson correlation coefficient sig error accountability confirmed 5/673 5/555 5/50 productivity, continuous improvement As it is shown in the tables (5) and (6), there is a significant positive relationship between Moral leadership and accountability. And all aspects of Moral leadership (landscape, altruism, commitment, Faith and hope, membership organization and productivity and continuous improvement) are positive and significant relationship with accountability. So the main hypothesis and auxiliary hypotheses are confirmed. H1: There is significant difference between different dimensions of moral leadership and organizational accountability in regard to priority in public organization in Uromieh city. H0: There is significant difference between different dimensions of moral leadership and organizational accountability in regard to priority in public organization in Uromieh city. • Friedman test Table 5: Friedman test Size Description 763 6 Number Freedom degree 9/999 Sig As it is shown in the table (7) , the results of Friedman test are statistically-significant as 0/000 and the resulting number is less than 5% (the error level) , so hypothesis H0 is rejected and H1 confirmed. Table 6: Friedman test to compare mean scores of variables of seven dimensions Moral leadership rank Mean of ranks variables 7 5 3 2 8 2/98 2/46 2/77 2/49 7/86 altruism productivity sig commitment landscape 6 4 2/79 7/66 faith membership As it is shown in the table 8, the mean values for each of the dimensions are expressed and priority of effects of each dimension of moral leadership was determined. Results showed the landscape dimension has first priority as average 3/16, therefore, is mostly related to the accountability. Significant dimension as 4/33 is the last priority. Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci., vols. 9, no. 2, 2015 Investigation of moral leadership status and its relationship to the organizational… 93 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS The results obtained from the first major test shows the average moral leadership is equal to 4/2 in public organizations in Uromia city and can be concluded the moral leadership rate in the population studied is higher than mean, so this rate is quite acceptable. Also there is significant relationship between moral leadership and accountability in Urmia city. According to the results from hypotheses examined in this study, there is a relationship between moral leadership, dimensions of moral leadership and accountability. This means that increasing moral leadership in public organizations in Uromieh city will improve the organizational accountability. In this study, the correlation method is used. In this regard, it is recommended the other researchers use the provided tests and models for moral leadership and organizational accountability by other methods such as regression, path analysis and comprehensive pattern in this regard: 1. Study the effect of characters specifications on staff accountability 2. Comparative study of moral leadership in public and private sector organizations 3. Study the relationship between consciousness and accountability 4. Study the relationship between moral leadership and Job Satisfaction 5. Present a model of organizational accountability in government organizations with an emphasis on organizational culture. REFERENCE 1. Alvani.M,Danaeifard.H. (1380), public administration and public confidence, knowledge management, (55), Tehran University Press. 2. Burack,E. (1999), Spirituality in the work place, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 12,No. 4,pp. 280-91 3. Chitsaz, Ali Zahedi, Shams al-Sadat. (1384) , impact-oriented management to meet the requirements of environmental patterns using state universities. The third international conference management. 4. Danaeifar.H. (1388), the government's management challenges: managing studies, publishing side. 5. Dimitra Petrakaki & et al, (2009), Narrowing down accountability through performance monitoring thchnology Egovernment in Greece, Niall Hayes and Lucas intrina.,vol 6 no.3. 6. Faghihi, AH. (1381), a system of accountability in the public sector: a comparative approach, Journal of Management Studies, No. 29 and 30. 7. Freshman,B. (1999), An exploratory analysis of definitions and applications of spirituality in the workplace, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 12No. 4,pp. 318-327. 8. Fry L , V itucci S , Cedillo M (2005), Spiritual leadership and army transformation: Theory, measurement,and establishing a baseline. Leadersh.Q.16(1):835 – 862. 9. Fry, L. W. (2003), “Toward Theory of Spiritual leadership the leadership Quarterly”. 14 (1), PP:693-124 10. Hughes, V (1377), "new public management" Translation: Alvany- Khalili Shvryny- Me'marzadeh, Morvarid Publishing. 11. Kinjerski, V. M. & Skrypnek Berna J. (2004). Defining Spirit at Work:Finding Common Ground, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12. Mark Turner and David Hume. (1379), governance, management and development, translation: Monavvarian, A., published by the Center for Public Management Education. 13. Milliman, J. Czaplewski, A.J. & Ferguson J. (2003), Workplace Spirituality and employee Work attitudes, Journal of Organizational Change Management Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 426-447. 14. Mostafaei, M. The role of the political system in administrative reform, the newspaper of 82 March seventeenth. 15. Nargesyan Abbas. (1386), contemporary spiritual leadership in the organization, management magazine, issue 189. 16. Romzek, B. S., & Ingraham, P. W. (2000). Cross Pressures of Accountability: Initiatives, Command, and Failure in the Ron Brown plane crash. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 240- 253. 17. Ziaeirad, Mohammad Sadeqh, Nrgesyan Abbas, Isfahan, Said. (1386) ¬, spiritual leadership role in empowering employees Tehran University. Public Administration, Volume 1, Number 1. Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci., vols. 9, no. 2, 2015
© Copyright 2024