Presentation2 Agenda Page Capital Link Shipping Forum March, 2015 [CLIENT NAME] Disclaimer Forward-Looking Statements This Presentation contains certain forward-looking statements relating to the business, future financial performance and results of the Company and/or the industry in which it operates. In particular, this Presentation contains forward-looking statements such as those with respect to cost of construction of the Company’s newbuildings and timing of their delivery, values of the assets of the Company and the potential future revenue and EBITDA these assets may yield under current or future contracts, the potential future revenues and cash flows of the Company, the potential future demand and market for the Company’s assets and the Company’s equity and debt financing requirements and its ability to obtain financing in a timely manner and at favorable terms. Forward-looking statements concern future circumstances and results and other statements that are not historical facts, sometimes identified by the words “believes”, “expects”, “predicts”, “intends”, “projects”, “plans”, “estimates”, “aims”, “foresees”, “anticipates”, “targets”, and similar expressions. The forward-looking statements contained in this Presentation, including assumptions, opinions and views of the Company or cited from third party sources, are solely opinions and forecasts which are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual events to differ materially from any anticipated development. Potential investors are expressly advised that financial projections, such as the revenue and cash flow projections contained herein, cannot be used as reliable indicators of future revenues or cash flows. Neither the Company, nor any of their parent or subsidiary undertakings or any such person’s officers or employees provides any assurance that the assumptions underlying such forward-looking statements are free from errors nor does any of them accept any responsibility for the future accuracy of the opinions expressed in this Presentation or the actual occurrence of the forecasted developments. No obligation is assumed to update any forward-looking statements or to conform these forward-looking statements to our actual results. 2 Overview: Investment Highlights Largest ECO VLGC fleet, VLGCs represent critical link in the LPG supply chain Fleet 3 Modern VLGCs, 3 ECO VLGCs, 1 pressurized LPG carrier 16 ECO VLGCs (Delivering Q2’15 – Q1’16) VLGC Vessel Count 20 Management Fully Integrated, In-house Commercial & Technical management Chartering strategy Balanced mix of time charters and spot exposure, targeting high quality counterparties Entry into LPG 22 +14 6 Current Fleet End 2015 Feb-16 Average Age (Years) Key Counterparties Global presence +2 Stamford, CT (Headquarters), London, UK and Piraeus, Greece 3.6 1.6 2002 End of 2014 End of 2015 3 Key Investment Highlights 1 US shale revolution has created a fundamental shift in trade flows 2 Rapid LPG growth creating tight supply-demand dynamics 3 VLGCs are a critical link in the global LPG supply chain 4 Significant built-in growth with the youngest and largest ECO VLGC fleet 5 Integrated technical and commercial management with proven track record 6 Strong balance sheet ensures flexibility and ability to capitalize on growth opportunities 7 Alignment of management and shareholder interest and significant founder investment 4 The Evolution of Dorian LPG Overview § § § § § Timeline Dorian (Hellas), S.A. of Greece was established in 1973, representing the shipping interests of principals with more than a century of shipping experience Entered the LPG market in 2002 through the acquisition of two pressurized vessels followed by four additional acquisitions over the following 18 months Expanded into the VLGC segment by commissioning three newbuildings that were delivered from 2006-2008 Our founders and management have collectively invested in excess of US$70m in Dorian LPG since its inception Dorian LPG is the only US headquartered major VLGC owner (Stamford, CT), giving it proximity to major US LPG exporters Significant market presence with 22 Modern VLGCs and targeting further consolidation Jan. 2015: Delivery of “Corvette” Sep. 2014: Delivery of NB VLGC “Corsair” May 2014: Successful IPO on the NYSE July 2014: Delivery of NB VLGC “Comet” at HHI November 2013: Acquired 13 VLGC NBs from STNG February 2014: Exercised option for 3 additional VLGCs July 2013: Ordered 3 ECO VLGCs at HHI 2011: Dorian LPG won Statoil’s Working Safely with Suppliers Award for ‘Best Shipping Supplier’ 2005-2006: Placed order for 4xVLGCs at HHI, Korea 2002-2003: Acquisition of small pressurized LPG carriers 1973: Dorian (Hellas) established 1980s: Completed tonnage renewal program London, UK 1959: John C. Hadjipateras & Sons entered the tanker market Stamford, USA Offices Headquarters Piraeus, Greece 1906: Family purchased first steamship, the Marietta Ralli 1950s: Orient MidEast Lines pioneered sailings from Great Lakes to Middle East 5 Source: Dorian LPG LPG VLGCs U.S. LPG exports have created secular supply dynamics -centered Improves local air quality By-product of natural gas and oil production around two long haul seaborne trade routes The largest LPG carriers are best suited for long haul trades 20% less CO2 than heating oil and 50% less than coal Avoids harmful or potentially dangerous waste Source: ExceptionalEnergy.com Competitive Petchem feedstock Autogas is the most accepted alternative auto fuel Fully refrigerated Gas Carriers (15-84,000cbm) Semi-refrigerated Gas Carriers (5-23,000cbm) Pressure Gas Carriers (<11,500cbm) 6 VLGCs are a Critical Link in the Global Supply Chain Production Shipping End Use LPG (Propane and Butane) is a by-product of oil and gas VLGCs are the most cost effective means of long haul LPG transportation Broad range of end uses for LPG Retail market 60% Gas production (~60%) VLGCs Autogas Industrial Bulk market 40% Oil production and refining (~40%) Cooking / Heating Chemical Refinery Other The most cost effective means of long haul LPG transportation Source: Poten & Partners 7 VLGC Day Rates at Healthy Levels Baltic VLGC Rate: Key Drivers of Rate Strength 160,000 Dayrate in USD/day VLGC Spot TCE 140,000 6 Month Trailing Ave. TCE 120,000 3 Year Trailing Ave. TCE 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 n Increased YOY LPG production and favorable U.S. pricing vs. Middle East pricing n Rapid increase in VLGC liftings from the USGC (Targa and Enterprise) n Increasing arbitrage movements West to East resulting in higher tonne-mile demand n Demand from India and China absorbing incremental LPG tonnage - 8 Bifurcation of Supply Making LPG Increasingly Competitive North American Export Terminal Capacity VLGC Equivalent Liftings per Month at Year End 40 70 Million Metric Tons 35 Enterprise (Houston, TX) 30 Targa (Galena Park, TX) 60 25 Sunoco (Nederland, TX) 50 Trafigura (Corpus Christi, TX) 20 Phillips 66 (Freeport, TX) 40 15 10 30 Sunoco/MarkW (Marcus Hook, PA) 20 PetroGas (Ferndale, WA) Sage (Longview, WA) 5 - Oxy (Ingleside, TX) Pembina (Portland, Oregon) 10 0 2012 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 New Price Competition 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 *VLGC capable terminals, n Significant Investments in LPG export terminal capacity and midstream processing confirm market commitment to exports n Unlike the LNG sector, fewer regulatory approvals are needed for LPG export terminals n NGL Production, in excess of domestic demand, has kept U.S. LPG prices low relative to the world market and is driving export growth n US residential and petchem demand should be offset by increasing use of ethane and natural gas Source: EIA, Bloomberg, IHS, Publically Available Information 9 Global LPG Supply Surging Global LPG Liftings Annual Liftings 70,000,000 6,650,611 Feb LPG 60,000,000 5,150,885 4,737,154 Jan LPG 50,000,000 40,000,000 4,906,912 30,000,000 20,000,000 9.6mm 10,000,000 10.8mm 5,624,811 5,909,698 Feb LPG Jan LPG 12.5mm 2013 2014 2015 YTD 0 2012 2013 Asian Demand growing (mm Tonnes) 2014 2015 YTD n US to become the world’s single largest LPG exporting nation n Competitive Pricing: n n Source: ICIS China, IHS linked to NGL supply demand dynamics not oil Asian LPG demand could absorb excess US supply 10 US Taking Market Share Global LPG Export Volumes by Region Source: IHS 11 Surge in Chinese PDH adds to Global Demand Commenced & Planned Chinese PDH Projects Project Tianjin Bohai Estimated annual total propane required (kta) Operational 790 Yes, 2013 Propylene derivative, Acrylic acid etc. Main Application Propane Feedstock Required VLGC Equivalents New Cumulative Chinese PDH Propane Feedstock New Cumulative Chinese PDH Propylene Production 250 Zhejiang Satelite 540 Yes, 2014 Propylene derivative, Acrylic acid etc. Sanyuan PC Shaoxing 540 Yes, 2014 Polypropylene Ningbo Haiyue 720 Yes, 2014 Propylene derivative, Acrylic acid etc. Wanhua Chem 900 Expected 2015 Propylene derivative, Acrylic acid etc. ZYPC 792 Expected 2015 Polypropylene Fujain PC 792 Expected 2016 Polypropylene 600 Expected 2016 Polypropylene Ningbo Fortune Oriental 792 Beyond 2016 Polypropylene 235 (000 tonnes) 12,000 10,000 200 173 152 8,000 150 115 100 6,000 69 50 4,000 2,000 21 0 0 2013 Hebei Haiwei Propylene Capacity 2014 2015 2016 2017 All Planned n PDH importers require high purity propane, best sourced from the US or Middle East n There are currently four Chinese PDH plants in operation n It estimated that total new propane demand from Chinese PDH plants in 2015 will be about 2 million tonnes n Sinopec, Tianjin Bohai, Oriental Energy, Fujain Meide, and Shaoxing Sanyuan Petrochemical have all signed long term supply contracts for US LPG n China is expected to reduce its reliance on imported polypropylene, which currently accounts for approximately 30% of its demand Note: Propylene production capacity to VLGC Equivalents of Propane demand: 1 tonne of propylene requires 1.18 tonnes of propane; 1 VLGC equivalent is 44,000 tonnes of propane Source: ICIS, Poten & Partners, CNBC.com; 4/10/14, “Riding shale boom, US to become major LPG supplier to China” 12 Fleet Built at World Class Korean Shipyards VLGC Newbuild Deliveries by Shipyard 2006-2016 13% 60% 13% 7% HHI is the most active and experienced yard in the design and construction of gas carriers * 7% n LPG vessels are highly engineered, and exacting technical specifications determine commercial acceptance n HHI and DSME also design and build some of the world’s most complex offshore vessels and rigs n Dorian Source: Clarksons has built 8 vessels at HHI since 2004 and maintains a strong relationship 13 Major Oil Companies Require Experienced Operators n Integrated, LPG Company with all Commercial/Technical services in-house. Meets requirements of the most demanding Oil Majors n Dedicated, Independent department on HSSEQ (Health, Safety, Security, Environment and Quality) n Doubling up crews on VLGCs in order to meet officer matrix requirements for future NB deliveries n Creating new training department under HSSEQ focused solely on Dorian SMS familiarization for new crew Working Safely with Suppliers Award n n US presence provides proximity to US based Oil Majors and traders and easy access to US export terminals Awarded by Statoil to Dorian for outstanding service and performance and steadfast commitment to HSE over 30 other shipping service providers 14 Dorian LPG Fleet Overview Overview of Chartering Strategy n 4 R Customers and Shareholders: n Return on capital: mix of long term and spot charters n Regular employment: fleet utilization n Risk management: strong counterparty n Responsive: to customers and the market Legend Current charters Future charters Available days Delivery date Overview of Vessel Employment 2014 Current fleet: Shipyard Sister Delivery / Vessels Open Captain Nicholas ML A - Captain John NP A - Captain Markos NL A Q3’19 Grendon - - Comet B Q2’19 Corsair B - Corvette B - Cougar B Q2’15 Cobra B Q2’15 Continental B Q2’15 Concorde B Q2’15 Constitution B Q3’15 Commodore B Q3’15 Cresques 1H’14 Statoil 2015 2H’14 1H’15 2016 2H’15 1H’16 2H’16 Spot Market Spot market Statoil Shell, Q3 2014 – Q3 2019 Spot Market Shell, Q3 2014 – Q2 2019 Spot Market Spot Market Firm Newbuildings: C Q3’15 Constellation B Q3’15 Cheyenne B Q3’15 Cratis B Q4’15 Clermont B Q4’15 Chaparral C Q4’15 Commander C Q4’15 Copernicus B Q4’15 Challenger B Q1’16 Caravel B Q1’16 Newbuilding vessels open for charter 15 Fleet Designed to Meet Tomorrow’s Regulations Outside an ECA Inside an ECA 0.50% m/m on and after 1 January 2020 0.10% m/m on and after 1 January 2015 Dorian LPG will have the youngest and most modern fleet of ECO VLGCs 3 17 Existing Scrubber Ready ECA: Emission Control Areas Source: International Maritime Organization Note: Regulations established to limit SOx and particulate matter emissions 2 Scrubber -Already Declared 16 ECO-Vessels Represent Significant Additional Earnings Potential Scrubber / Scrubber Ready Low Friction, Self Polishing Paint Fuel Oil Consumption Analysis 55 50 45 40 Dorian ME-G type NB (ECO) Traditional VLGC -17% 44.0 36.5 MAN B&W’s New G-Type Engine -17% 46.1 n n n Optimized Hull Design Electronic Engine Control De-rated, Long Stroke Design Improved Propeller Design Babcock’s New LGE Cooling Plant 38.4 n 35 n 30 n 25 n Marine Gas Oil (MGO) Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) Greater Re-liquefaction Efficiency Ethane in LPG Mix: 8% vs. 2.5% Cargo Combinations: 16 vs. 8 Cooling Capability: -52º vs. -48ºC Optimized Hull Design Average daily fuel savings of >$3,0001 Source: Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI), MAN B&W, FT Maritime Services, Company, Managers ¹ Fuel saving assuming loaded condition at 16 knots and Fuel price at USD 450/MT for HFO (Basis AG-East round trip voyage, including port days) 17 Strategic Business Development Initiatives § Pool with Phoenix Tankers Ltd., one of the foremost VLGC operators in Asia § Expands the Company’s global presence and strengthen its position in the increasingly important Eastern LPG market including India § Increases overall fleet utilization § Alliance with HNA Group of China § Enhances Dorian LPG’s access to and knowledge of the Chinese LPG market and customers 18 18 Fully Funded Financing n On January 12th, 2015, Dorian LPG announced that it had received commitments of up to $761 million for financing its fleet of newbuilding VLGCs from: Tranches n Commercial Debt $ 250 mm KEXIM Direct $ 205 mm KEXIM Guaranteed $ 203 mm K-Sure Insured $ 103 mm Total Debt: $ 761 mm Key metrics on financing package: n Weighted average margin over Libor à 2.1% n Weighted average profile 14 Years à 19 Multiple Pillars for Creating Shareholder Value Fleet of 22 VLGCs with 19 ECO newbuilds contracted for delivery 2015– January 2016 Expect to have opportunities to increase exposure through: pooling arrangements, further vessel acquisitions and strategic partnerships with major oil companies and traders Time chartering strategy creates opportunity for shareholders to realize more value through potential MLP dropdowns Strong, moderately leveraged balance sheet and stable earnings create opportunities to fund growth or pay dividends 20 Key Investment Highlights 1 US shale revolution has created a fundamental shift in trade flows 2 Rapid LPG growth creating tight supply-demand dynamics 3 VLGCs are a critical link in the global LPG supply chain 4 Significant built-in growth with the youngest and largest ECO VLGC fleet 5 Integrated technical and commercial management with proven track record 6 Strong balance sheet ensures flexibility and ability to capitalize on growth opportunities 7 Alignment of management and shareholder interest and significant founder investment 21 Statement of Operations (in USD) Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 (Unaudited) Statement of Operations Revenues $ 68,796,041 Nine Months Ended March 31, 2014 (Audited) $ 29,633,700 Voyage expenses 14,899,147 6,670,971 Vessel operating expenses 14,412,174 8,394,959 Management fees – related party 1,125,000 3,122,356 General and administrative expenses 9,389,689 6,620,372 28,970,031 4,825,042 9,467,720 433,674 Operating income 19,502,311 4,391,368 Other income/(loss), net (3,069,780) (1,557,525) EBITDA Depreciation and amortization Net income $ 16,432,531 $ 2,833,843 Time charter equivalent rate (1) $ 48,251 $ 24,402 Daily vessel operating expenses (2) $ 10,621 $ 8,531 Adjusted EBITDA (3) $ 30,062,118 $ 12,137,422 (1) Our method of calculating time charter equivalent rate is to divide revenue net of voyage expenses by operating days for the relevant time period. (2) Calculated by dividing vessel operating expenses by calendar days for the relevant time period. 22 (3) Represents net income before interest and finance costs, gain/loss on derivatives-net, stock compensation expense and depreciation and amortization and is used as a supplemental financial measure by management to assess our financial and operating performance. Balance Sheet and Cash Flows (in USD) December 31, 2014 (Unaudited) Balance Sheet Cash and cash equivalents $ March 31, 2014 (Audited) 182,804,170 Restricted cash, current $ 279,131,795 — 30,948,702 6,010,000 4,500,000 1,010,221,551 840,245,766 9,612,000 9,612,000 Long-term debt – net of current portion 113,022,000 119,106,500 Total liabilities 146,377,901 148,046,334 Restricted cash, non‑current Total assets Current portion of long-term debt Total shareholders' equity $ $ Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 (Unaudited) Cash Flows Net income 863,843,650 $ 16,432,531 692,199,432 Nine Months Ended March 31, 2014 (Audited) $ 2,833,843 Adjustments 11,465,399 4,798,718 Changes in operating assets and liabilities (6,103,493) (387,139) 21,794,437 7,236,422 (265,524,048) (221,434,724) 148,356,760 493,322,093 (954,774) 8,004 Net cash provided by operating activities Net cash used in investing activities Net cash provided by financing activities Effects of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents Net increase in cash and cash equivalents $ (96,327,625) $ 279,131,795 23 www.dorianlpg.com 24
© Copyright 2024