presentation

NEW CONCEPTS OF
MOBILITY TO FOSTER CAREER
DEVELOPMENT AND GENDER
BALANCE IN EUROPE
Maria BOSTENARU DAN, Maria Manuela NOGUEIRA
Aim of the session

The report on the outcome of the ESOF (Euroscience
Open Forum) 2014 session on Gender Equality
shows the impact of mobility on academic careers. It
also shows where inequalities stand and how to
develop new concepts of mobility to foster career
development and gender balance in Europe.
Aim of the session

Such new concepts of mobility include virtual mobility,
intersectorial and interdisciplinary mobility in addition to
geographic mobility. However, in view to the other contribution,
it is the geographic mobility which best enable the knowing of
other cultures, including language, and overcoming such
barriers, and the soft skills this provides. Virtual mobility, which
is much spreading now, is focusing on English as general tuition
language also in non-English speaking countries, as several
publications/conferences show.
M-WiSET history


Mobile Women in Science Engineering and
Technology
At the begin Science in Policy group
 Studies
of Magda Lola (group leader), working at
Human Resources at CERN on equal opportunities
among others

Gianna Avellis and Raffaella Di Sante stated the
objectives and activities of the m-WiSET WG and
choose the name
M-WiSET activities




ESOF sessions (Stockholm, Barcelona, Turin, Dublin, Copenhagen)
Eurodoc participation (Lisbon, Budapest, Cluj)
Participation to preparation of Young Researcher Platform (Irene)
m-WiSET booklet on Role Models for MCFA woman scientists



Promoted at the Marie Curie Conference in Warsaw EU presidency
Dedicated session in ESOF2012 Dublin
Invitations to other events

Conference under the EU presidency in Budapest (2011)
Portraits of role models (interview withjournalists, portrait for EU gallery etc), German media
Radio Romania Cultural
 Invited in a committee about promotion of Women in Japan (5 years programme starting with
programme „Water“)
International observer and WG3 member in genderSTE







Vilnius EU presidency conference
Rome conference
Horizon 2020 policy
iGiants database – White house USA (interviews in June 2015)
Collaboration with WIRES (online - USA), ECWT, ITWIIN, …


Icorsa: project proposal
MOMOWO database
Approaches

We used the following sociological approaches
 Statistics
of human ressources
 Surveys and their evaluation
 Case study approach (role models)
 Database entries

We are looking at
 Contemporary
women in science – examples from the
association
 Approach to women around a certain topic (cities in
genderSTE, water in Japan symposium, different other
topics at WIRES, ICT at ECWT)
ESOF 2014
ESOF





Stockholm 2004 – partner in
the Career Programme
Barcelona 2008 – Should I
stay or should I go
Turin 2010 – dual career
Dublin 2012 – role models
(booklet)
Copenhagen 2014 together
with ESF
M-WiSET ebook on Role Models
Organisers
Maria BOSTENARU DAN (MCFA)
Maria Manuela NOGUEIRA (ESF)
Programme




Welcome by the moderator (Beate Scholz)
Presentations
Round tables
Conclusion
Presentations

European policy and researcher mobility
 Conor
O’Carroll • Chair of European Research Area
(ERA) Steering Group on Human Resources and Mobility

The role of virtual mobility
 Laura

Marin • Swedish Research Council
Intersectoral mobility for women
 Gianna
Avellis • MCFA
Round tables
Round table 1 (3 tables)
Appraisal of different mobility concepts
Chairs and Rapporteurs
Gianna Avellis • MCFA
Antonella di Trapani • MCFA
Maria Manuela Nogueira • ESF
Appraisal of different mobility
concepts – lead questions



How do research funders and universities handle
different mobility concepts in peer review or
appointment?
What are individual researchers’ experiences?
Are there any examples of promising practice that
others might learn from?
Appraisal of different mobility
concepts – findings

Partnership issues – dual careers. When it is easier
to move first and when it is easier to remain?
 agencies



Cultural and societal prejudices
Role models can help
Intersectorial and virtual mobility can be an
alternative for women to geographic mobility
Appraisal of different mobility
concepts – findings

Partnership issues – dual careers. When it is easier
to move first and when it is easier to remain?
 agencies

Cultural and societal prejudices
 Language


integration
Role models can help
Intersectorial and virtual mobility can be an
alternative for women to geographic mobility
Round table 2 (3 tables)
Mobility patterns by women researchers
Chairs and Rapporteurs
Maria Bostenaru Dan • MCFA
Riia Chmielowski • MCFA
Magdalini Theodoridou • MCFA
Colleague from Icorsa
Mobility patterns by women
researchers – lead questions



Which opportunities and challenges do women
researchers face as a consequence of different
mobility patterns?
What should research organisations do in order to
provide equal playing fields?
How could women researchers benefit from
intersectoral mobility?
Mobility patterns by women
researchers – lead questions



Which opportunities and challenges do women
researchers face as a consequence of different
mobility patterns?
What should research organisations do in order to
provide equal playing fields?
How could women researchers benefit from
intersectoral mobility?
Mobility patterns by women
researchers – findings

Many times geographical mobility





Difficulties in interdisciplinary and intersectorial
mobility
Necessity to prepare for different career paths
Necessity to recognise in peer review
Good practices in Finland
Mobility patterns by women
researchers – findings

Many times geographical mobility
 Learning
a different culture, with its heritage and
customs
 Culture more than language




Difficulties in interdisciplinary and intersectorial
mobility
Necessity to prepare for different career paths
Necessity to recognise in peer review
Good practices in Finland
Round table 3 (3 tables)
Virtual mobility
Chairs and Rapporteurs
Laura Marin • Swedish Research Council
Conor O’Carroll • Chair of ERA Steering Group
on Human Resources and Mobility
Cornelia Soetbeer • Volkswagen Stiftung
Virtual mobility lead questions



How could virtual mobility be supported at best?
What are, ideally, the outcomes of virtual mobility?
In which way could virtual mobility be adequately
appraised in peer review or selection procedures?
Virtual mobility - findings


Necessity of internet
Necessity of short visits


Problems in acknowledging in evaluation
Inclusive

Co-tutelle -

Virtual mobility - findings


Necessity of internet
Necessity of short visits
The touch of culture – incl. language
 Research and education networks which make possible both digital
contact and short visits
 At more senior level



Problems in acknowledging in evaluation
Inclusive
Mostly English, but not always (FernUni Hagen)
 Less cost (keynote)
 Inclusion by the host society if not there?


Co-tutelle - doctorate
Conclusions
Read the detailed outcomes in the document
prepared by the ESF
http://www.esf.org/uploads/media/2014-0622_New-Concepts-of-Mobility_SessionSummary.pdf
Further echo
Nature correspondence on virtual mobility
Read a copy at http://www.esf.org/uploads/media/Nature_Correspondence_v511_n7509_01.pdf
Good bye ESOF 2014, welcome
ESOF 2016 Manchester
http://www.esof.eu/home.html
Call open!
Science for policy and policy for science
-Research careers
-
Interested in a common proposal?
ESOF –
under the patronage of the Queen of Denmark
ESOF opening session
Further cooperation


genderSTE with eurodoc in Lisbon
Rome postdoc on the topic of water and pioneer
architects
 genderSTE
WG3
 Matrices
 European
projects (ex. MOMOWO)
 Maybe a future common event in Rome?

Application for projects – GERI4
Thank you!