(Microsoft PowerPoint - Fysioterapikongressen Lillestr\370m Britt

Bekken- løsning? plager? smerter?
Behandling av
bekkenleddsmerter
-’core’ & hva mer?
• En tilstand med mange navn og uklare kriterier Heiberg
1995
• Fysiologisk bekkenløsning
• Symptomgivende bekkenløsning
• Bekkenleddsyndrom Dnlf 1990
• Pelvic girdle pain / PGP Vleeming 2008
Britt Stuge
PT, PhD
Oslo University Hospital
fysio-terapi as
• Bekkenleddsplager Stuge Dnlf 2010
1
• Bekkenleddsmerter Stuge Veilederen 2014
FYSIOTERAPIKONGRESSEN 2015
Diagnostics
Pelvic girdle pain
(PGP)
• Provocation tests
–
–
–
–
• ”Is a specific form of low back pain that can occur
separately or in conjunction with low back pain ”
• «A definition is proposed for pelvic musculoskeletal
pain under the title ‘pelvic girdle pain (PGP)’ in order to
exclude gynaecological and/or urological disorders,
and to promote a consistent use of terminology»
P4 (posterior pelvic pain provocation test)
Patrick Faber
Gaenslen’s test
Modified Trendelenburg
• Pain palpation tests
– LDL
– Symphysis
• Functional test
– ASLR test
Stuge, Dnlf 2010
Vleeming, European guidelines 2008
3
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PELVIC GIRDLE PAIN AND PELVIC
FLOOR MUSCLE FUNCTION
Etiology
• Hormonal
• Biomechanical
• Psycho-social
• Motor control
De Rosa 2001
6
5
100
CG
SSEG
80
60
40
20
Pain intensity (VAS 0-100)
Oswestry score (0-100)
100
CG
SSEG
80
• The study affording the best evidence used
individual guidance and adjustments given by the
physiotherapist
60
40
20
0
0
20
weeks
2 year
postpar
Baseline
p=0.15 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001
p=0.19
Baseline
1 year
postpar
20
weeks
1 year
postpar
2 year
postpar
– more studies are needed…..
p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001
Systematic reviews
• High quality evidence is lacking to make specific clinical
recommondations for or against the use of lumbopelvic
neuromuscular training in the rehabilitation of individuals
after musculoskeletal injury Briggs 2013
• Targeted core stability training provides marginal benefits to
athletic performance Reed 2012
• Strong evidence that stabilisation exercises are not
more effective than any other form of active exercise
in the long term
– A trend of worse FABQ scores with stabilizing exercises
• Weak associations between baseline TrA/LM characteristics
and future clinical outcomes Wong 2013
• Focus on implementing multijoint free weight exercises,
rather than core-specific exercises, to adequately train the
core muscles in their athlete clients Marstuscello 2013
A treatment program
Stuge 2014
Vleeming & Lee 2001
•
The dialog and the individualized guidance seems to be experienced as
positive for the women’s coping of their daily life
•
By being active agents in managing their PGP and therapy they learned to
set themselves proximal goals
•
Perceived hope and self-efficacy seems to be essential for developing a
capacity for self-management and an enhanced ability to benefit from
appropriate learning experiences
Maladaptive behaviour
Patient care
• Interventions should focus less on specific stabilizing muscles
and more on behaviour and optimal dynamic control of
movements
• It might be that inherent underlying maladaptive movement
may act as potential ongoing peripheral nociception rather
than a strategy to avoid pain
– A pattern of increased co-contraction of trunk stabilizing muscles during tasks
that provoke pain and an inability to relax muscles are reported
• The examination should
– together with an assessment of the psycho-social factors and cognitive
aspects
– involve analysis of the functional impairments reported by the patient to
determine whether the movement and pain behaviours are adaptive
(protective) or maladaptive (provocative)
• Choice of exercise to individual person
• Quality of exercise performance
Daenkerts 2011
Most effective exercise therapy
• Individually designed treatment programs
– Supervised
• home exercise with regular therapist follow-up
• encouraging adherence
– to achieve optimal dosage
Hayden 2005
Cognitive behavioral principles
• Encorage the patient to:
– reconceptualize pain
– optimism/goal settings
• change is possible!
– play an active role in the treatment
– self-efficacy
– acknowledge their success
• Individualizing treatment to the patient
Kolt 2004