Fat Embolism Syndrome Dr. Alex Rabinovich Introduction • Zenker (Pathologist) first identified fat embolism syndrome (FES) at autopsy in 1862. • von Bergmann was the first physician to identify FES clinically in 1873. • Initial clinical description was respiratory and neurological manifestations with petechial hemorrhages. Introduction • Most commonly associated with LONG BONE (Femur, Tibia, Humerus, …), PELVIC and SPINAL #’s • More frequent in CLOSED > OPEN #’s • Younger pt’s (more bone marrow) > Older Pt’s • A single long bone # has 1-5% chance of developing FES, this directly correlates with the number of long bone #’s • FES has been reported as high as 33% in bilateral femoral fractures. Introduction Pathophysiology • 2 Theories • Mechanical vs. Biochemical • Mechanical – Fat globules from disrupted bone marrow or adipose tissue are forced into torn venules in areas of trauma. • Biochemical – Hormonal changes caused by trauma and/or sepsis induce systemic release of free fatty acids (FFA) as chylomicrons which cause the systemic FES. Pathophysiology • Mechanical – Fractures of marrow-containing bone (Femur, Pelvis) have the highest incidence of FES and cause the largest volume of fat emboli, because the disrupted venules in the marrow remain tethered open by their osseous attachments. – The marrow contents enter the venous circulation with little difficulty. Pathophysiology • Mechanical – This theory is supported by research on Orthopaedic long bone (IM reaming) and spinal surgeries which cause fat globules to enter the blood circulation when vigorous reaming/fixation is done. – Increased Pressure + Volume Æ Extravasation – Measuring fat globules pre and post reaming shows significant difference in concentration. Pathophysiology • Mechanical – But what makes this clinically significant? – Fat droplets are deposited in the pulmonary capillary beds and travel through arteriovenous shunts to the brain. Systems affected include LUNG, BRAIN and CIRCULATION. – Microvascular lodging of droplets produces local ischemia and inflammation, with concomitant release of inflammatory mediators, platelet aggregation, and vasoactive amines. Pathophysiology • Biochemical – FES is dependent upon degradation of the embolized fat into free fatty acids. – Neutral fat does not cause an acute lung injury, it is hydrolyzed over the course of hours to several products, including FFA, which cause ARDS in animal models. – CRP (acute phase reactant), which is elevated in trauma patients, appears to be responsible in lipid agglutination (FES) for both traumatic and nontraumatic FES. Pathophysiology • Biochemical – The process of Neutral fat cells -> FFA -> Agglutination with CRP may explain the time sequence of clinical findings in FES. – Onset of symptoms may coincide with Agglutination. – This theory is animal model based and circumstantial at best. Clinical • Diagnosis is made clinically NOT chemically. It does not matter how much fat globules are in your circulation, it just matters if you have their side effects. • FES typically manifests 24 to 72 hours after the initial insult. Rarely <12 hrs or >72 hrs. • Classic triad: Hypoxemia; Neurologic abnormalities; and a Petechial Rash Clinical • SOB, Inc RR, Hypoxemia are early findings. 50% of pt’s with symptoms will need ventilation support. Respiratory dysfunction is major cause of mortality, which is about 10-20%. • Neurologic symptoms usually develop after lung injury, and include: Confusion, altered LOC, Headaches, +/- Seizures, +/- Strokes with Focal Deficits. • Petechial rash is usually a late finding (frequency of 20-50% of pt’s). Head, neck, anterior thorax, subconjunctiva, and axillae are most common regions. Clinical • Petechiae result from the occlusion of dermal capillaries by fat globules, leading to extravasation of erythrocytes. • No abnormalities of platelet function have been documented. • The rash resolves in five to seven days. • Other Findings – – – – – Scotomata (Purtscher's retinopathy) Lipiduria Fevel Coagulation Abnormalities (DIC like) Myocardial Depression Diagnosis • FES is clinical diagnosis • CXR (n) mostly. Some have patchy consolidations at periphery or bases due to alveolar hemorrhages, but not sensitive nor specific (snow storm pattern). • Ventilation/perfusion scans may demonstrate a mottled pattern of subsegmental perfusion defects with a normal ventilatory pattern. • Focal areas of ground glass opacification with interloblar septal thickening are generally seen on chest CT • MRI of the brain may reveal high intensity T2 signal, which correlates with the degree of clinical neurologic impairment Diagnosis • Common misconception that the presence of fat globules, either in sputum, urine, or a wedged PA catheter, is necessary to confirm the diagnosis of FES • In 50% of fracture patients, fat globules was demonstrated in the serum, without symptoms of FES. • HOWEVER • Growing literature on the use of bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage to detect fat droplets in alveolar macrophages as a means to diagnose fat embolism. Sensitivity and specificity are unknown, being studied in Trauma patients. Diagnosis – Classic Gurd’s criteria • 1 major criteria and at least 4 minor criteria Major Criteria • PaO2 < 60mmHg & FiO2 >40% • Altered mentation • Petechial rash Minor Criteria • Temp > 38.5 0C • HR > 120/min • PLTs < 150 X 109/L • Retinal fat emboli • Oliguria/anuria • Fat globules in urine • ↓ HCT not attributed to blood loss or IVF dilution • Fat macroglobulemia Treatment • ATLS protocol • High clinical suspicion during 3rd survey 1. Early immobilization of fracture and early definitive reduction (open or closed). 2. Maintain intravascular volume to maintain cardiovascular stability (hypovolemic shock resuscitation), may use colloids (albumin) as it can expand fluid and bind FFA. 3. Mechanical ventilation with PEEP Treatment 4. IV Ethanol has been used in Russia, Europe and some American centres to decrease rate of FES. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Oct;59(7):878-80 “A raised level of alcohol in the blood was associated with a lower incidence of fat embolism” all other variables controlled. Other studies Can J Surg. 1970 Jan;13(1):41-9 Br Med J. 1978 May 13;1(6122):1232-4 Treatment 5. Corticosteroids (controversial) • • • • Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978 Sep;147(3):358-62 Ann Intern Med. 1983 Oct;99(4):438-43 J Trauma. 1987 Oct;27(10):1173-6 J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1987 Jan;69(1):128-31 • • • Methylprednisolone is the study drug Randomized double blind studies Specific to fractures and all other variables controlled. RCT’s with control drugs. Differences was dosing and timing of drug admin. Major S/E looked at: GI Bleeds, Infections, Delayed healing, Cortisol issues, and CVS stability (cardiac mostly), Mortality • • Treatment 5. Corticosteroids 12 doses • • • • • • Other doses: 1.5 mg/kg q8h X 48 hrs Statistical Significance in reduction of clinical diagnosed FES No major complications were noted Potential for complications is the major concern (bleeds, infection, cardiac compromise) Key is to initiate treatment early and for a short period of time Be cautious of the S/E Treatment • The overall outcomes of FES with respect to isolated long bone, pelvis and spine fractures is good with standard immobilization and reduction of fracture, fluid resuscitation and ventilator support as needed. • Steroids and Ethanol treatments can be adjuncts to treatment, but most be started early. Recommended to start with low dose and for a period of 24-48 hours. • No evidence on Steroids or Ethanol Tx once FES is diagnosed. This is only for Prophylaxis Almost Over • Now that you have learned the basics of FES. • Its time for your final exam Questions • What percentage of people with skeletal trauma would normally develop fat emboli, and what percentage of these would then develop the Fat Embolism Syndrome? 1. 2. 3. 4. 30% and 12% 50% and 10% 70% and 1% 90% and 5% Questions • What percentage of people with skeletal trauma would normally develop fat emboli, and what percentage of these would then develop the Fat Embolism Syndrome? 1. 2. 3. 4. 30% and 12% 50% and 10% 70% and 1% 90% and 5% Questions • How does fat emboli enter the systemic circulation (arterial vs. venous)? Questions • How does fat emboli enter the systemic circulation (arterial vs. venous)? • Patent Foramen Ovale Questions • What percentage of the general population are considered to have a patent foramen ovale? • • • • 5% 15% 25% 40% Questions • What percentage of the general population are considered to have a patent foramen ovale? • • • • 5% 15% 25% 40% Questions • A biochemical theory suggests that a chemical event during trauma, or during the activation of the stress response, affects the solubility of circulating lipids causing them to coalesce and form systemic emboli. These emboli travel to lungs, brain and skin to give the FES triad of signs. There are some very unusual causes of FES in the nontrauma patients, including the strikingly unusual: liposuction, chemotherapy, renal transplant. 1. True 2. False Questions • A biochemical theory suggests that a chemical event during trauma, or during the activation of the stress response, affects the solubility of circulating lipids causing them to coalesce and form systemic emboli. These emboli travel to lungs, brain and skin to give the FES triad of signs. There are some very unusual causes of FES in the nontrauma patients, including the strikingly unusual: liposuction, chemotherapy, renal transplant. 1. True 2. False Questions • The pulmonary signs are usually noted first and include tachypnoeia, dyspnoea and cyanosis. These signs result from the embolic fat being hydrolised by lung lipase with the release of lung-toxic FFA. These FFAs induce an acute lung injury and subsequent ARDS. • This process accounts for the time period between injury and onset of clinical signs of FES. Time period is usually: 1. 2. 3. 4. 6 to 12 hours 12 to 24 hours 24 to 72 hours 72 to 84 hours Questions • The pulmonary signs are usually noted first and include tachypnoeia, dyspnoea and cyanosis. These signs result from the embolic fat being hydrolised by lung lipase with the release of lung-toxic FFA. These FFAs induce an acute lung injury and subsequent ARDS. • This process accounts for the time period between injury and onset of clinical signs of FES. Time period is usually: 1. 2. 3. 4. 6 to 12 hours 12 to 24 hours 24 to 72 hours 72 to 84 hours Questions • • The cutaneous signs are usually seen within 72 hours. On a critically ill patient they may go unnoticed, thereby losing the chance for confirmation of diagnosis. The rash is usually seen on: 1. 2. 3. 4. Thighs / Calves / Ankles Clustered around the fracture site Chest / Axilla / Conjunctiva Back of the head and knees Questions • • The cutaneous signs are usually seen within 72 hours. On a critically ill patient they may go unnoticed, thereby losing the chance for confirmation of diagnosis. The rash is usually seen on: 1. 2. 3. 4. Thighs / Calves / Ankles Clustered around the fracture site Chest / Axilla / Conjunctiva Back of the head and knees Questions • • 1. 2. 3. 4. Cerebral signs are non-specific, very rarely focal: headache, irritability and delirium. Severe cases may show coma and convulsions. These signs are produced by embolism of fat through a patent foramen ovale and subsequent microvascular occlusion of the brain circulation by fat. Embolic fat can produce the necessary right heart pressures to open a patent foramen ovale but what is another causative factor? Increased cardiac pressures from ventilation Pneumothorax or haemothorax Poor positioning on the OR table Pressure exerted on the chest by OR equipment Questions • • 1. 2. 3. 4. Cerebral signs are non-specific, very rarely focal: headache, irritability and delirium. Severe cases may show coma and convulsions. These signs are produced by embolism of fat through a patent foramen ovale and subsequent microvascular occlusion of the brain circulation by fat. Embolic fat can produce the necessary right heart pressures to open a patent foramen ovale but what is another causative factor? Increased cardiac pressures from ventilation Pneumothorax or haemothorax Poor positioning on the OR table Pressure exerted on the chest by OR equipment Questions • • Diagnosis is always made on clinical grounds, there is no specific "test" for FES. Various sets of criteria exist to make the diagnosis more accurate, such as those of Gurd & Wilson or those of Vedrienne, Guillaume and Gagnieu. Management is then supportive as there is no specific treatment of the FES. Guidelines for the management of FES would include: 1. Prompt immobilisation of the fracture / delayed internal fixation of the fracture / early use of steroids / early use of Heparin 2. Prompt immobilisation of the fracture / early internal fixation of the fracture / prompt treatment of hypoxia / maintenance of cardiac output 3. Prompt immobilisation of fracture / intraoperative surgical embolectomy / early use of IV Ethanol / daily low dose Aspirin 4. Prompt immobilisation of the fracture / avoidance of intramedullary nails / early use of steroids / mandatory use of calf compressors Questions • • Diagnosis is always made on clinical grounds, there is no specific "test" for FES. Various sets of criteria exist to make the diagnosis more accurate, such as those of Gurd & Wilson or those of Vedrienne, Guillaume and Gagnieu. Management is then supportive as there is no specific treatment of the FES. Guidelines for the management of FES would include: 1. Prompt immobilisation of the fracture / delayed internal fixation of the fracture / early use of steroids / early use of Heparin 2. Prompt immobilisation of the fracture / early internal fixation of the fracture / prompt treatment of hypoxia / maintenance of cardiac output 3. Prompt immobilisation of fracture / intraoperative surgical embolectomy / early use of IV Ethanol / daily low dose Aspirin 4. Prompt immobilisation of the fracture / avoidance of intramedullary nails / early use of steroids / mandatory use of calf compressors Questions • A Pulmonary Artery Catheter is often inserted to facilitate the use of inotropic agents and fluids in a critically ill patient with FES. Bearing in mind that there will be widespread microvascular occlusion with fat in the pulmonary vasculature what would be the most typical finding? 1. 2. 3. 4. A high Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) A low Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) A high Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) A low Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) Questions • A Pulmonary Artery Catheter is often inserted to facilitate the use of inotropic agents and fluids in a critically ill patient with FES. Bearing in mind that there will be widespread microvascular occlusion with fat in the pulmonary vasculature what would be the most typical finding? 1. 2. 3. 4. A high Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) A low Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) A high Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) A low Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) Questions • A patient who does not develop a petechial rash by day 2 or 3 on his or her chest, anterior axillary folds or conjunctiva does not have either Fat Embolism or Fat Embolism Syndrome. 1. True 2. False Questions • A patient who does not develop a petechial rash by day 2 or 3 on his or her chest, anterior axillary folds or conjunctiva does not have either Fat Embolism or Fat Embolism Syndrome. 1. True 2. False The END • Thank you • References 1. UpToDate website 2. eMedicine website
© Copyright 2024