OFFIC I OF THE eE TRAL REGISTRAR 0 COOPERATIVE

No. L-l 10] 5/56/20 15-L&iVl
l'
GovcrJ1m 'n [ I' Inel i;l
Min'':>lr»)r gricultur'
Department ur i:oricllhLlr~c' CO(1p~n.l iun
OFFIC
I
OF THE eE TRAL REGISTRAR 0
COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES
Krishi Bhavan. N
\~
Delhi.
ORDER
nder the provisions of sub-section (3) of Section 7 of the Multi St
Whereas the Chief Promoter of Hindustan Toursim Development Cooperati e So iet)
Ltd., 29 onkucbi, Bye Lane No.3, Beharbari, Guwahati-781029, Assam had submitted a
proposal for registration of the proposcd society under the Multi State Cooperative Societies Act,
2002 (MSCS Act, 2002).
hereas the following deficiencies were found in the application submitted by the Society:
1.
As per circular dated 26.3.2014, it has becn decided that henceforth, the primary multi
state cooperative societies shall be registered initially with only two contiguous states/Uts
as area of operation. Since Assam, Orissa and West Bengal are not contiguous states, this
cannot be considered for registration.
2. The name of the society is misleading; it gives an impression as if it is an alJ India level
society.
3. Soci ty has submitted photo copy of the Bank Certiflcate.
4. Scheme of viabil ity does not outline the fact that how the society will become a viable unit.
5. Provision of notice to defaulters has not been incorporated in bye-laws.
6. Bye-law no. 20(iii) relates to credit for which
following documents have been
mandatory for the proposed credit societies to submit along with their proposal of
registration :­
A. No Objection Certificate from the Registrar of Cooperative Societies of the States/ .T.
where the area of operation of the society extends.
B. A certificate to the effect that the credentials of the Chief Promoter/Promoters members
have been verified by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies of the concerned States.
7. Bye-law no. 23 is not consistent with Rule 13 of the MSCS Act, 2002.
8. Bye-law no. 26(d) is vague.
9. Composition of Board is not depicted in bye-law no. 28(a).
] O. "ome of the important provisions ,like prohibition to hold office of President/Vice
President, removal of elected members of the board has not been incorporated.
11. ill proofs of the members have not been attested by the Chief Promoter.
12. efinition of person in bye-law no. 2(h) is not consistent with section 25 of the MSCS Act,
2002.
13. pening paragraph bye-law no. 3 mentions the name of some other society "Coop.
Tour".
14. Bye-law no. 34(iii) is against the principles of democratic management of cooperatives.
Whereas under the provisions of Section 7(3) of the MSCS Act, 2002 the Chief Promoter
vide notice of even number dated the 24 1h April, 2015 was given an opportunity of personal
th
hearing on 30
April, 2015 to contest the deficiencies.
Whereas none appeared for hearing. Since the existing proposal is having deficiencies as
mentioned in the notice dt.24.04.201 5 and the same was not contested, the proposed Society in the
name of Hindustan Toursim Development Cooperative Society Ltd., 29 Sonkuchi, Bye Lane
- 2­
or
003 Beha.ohari, Glm ahati-781 029, Assam c10c c nol mC'et the requirement. (d' the prm i. inlls
the Multi ~Iatl.: Co-operative
ci tic~ Cl. 2002 llllli rLlIc~ ll1adl' tile 'clIl1tkr and therefi re cannot
be nsidcre 110r registration.
Acorclingly. the proposal is returned herewith in original. J I \\ever. the societv is at
libe/1) to submit a frc h propo. I and the same shall be con. id red as per the provi ions of M
Act. 2002 and MSC Rul s, 2002 made thereunder.
Given undet' my hand and seal on
- 0t\- pril, 20] 5.
Ene/:- as above
(Raj Singh)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India
&
Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies
To:
The Chief Promoter (Dr. Sutanu Samanta),
Hindustan Toursim Development Cooperative Society Ltd.,
29 Sonkuchi, Bye Lane No.3, Beharbari,
Guwahati-78 1029, Assam