How to Allocate a Warhol Viewpoint

Viewpoint
Timely Insights from the Private Banking & Investment Group • JANUARY 2014
How to Allocate a Warhol
Record prices have many investors looking at their collections for returns. But how
should a masterpiece fit in your portfolio? Here, an updated look at art as an asset.
Another auction; another record. In the case of Christie’s
work by Bacon—paying $86.3 million for another triptych back
annual November auction of postwar and contemporary
in 2008—had decided to add to his collection.
artworks in Manhattan, however, it wasn’t just one record that
was smashed. Over the course of an evening of frenzied bid-
The New York auctions—one in November and one in May,
ding, collectors paid higher prices than ever before for works
featuring a series of sales of postwar and contemporary art at
by 10 artists, while the sale itself ended up winning the title
both Christie’s and archrival Sotheby’s—of course, are only the
of the most lucrative such auction ever, bringing a total of
tip of the $61 billion global art market. The rest of the activity
$691.6 million. It also featured the single most expensive work
takes place in private sales or at the art fairs to which collectors
of art ever sold at auction, a 1969 triptych by Francis Bacon,
travel each year. Collectors and their art advisors flock from New
Three Studies of Lucian Freud, featuring portraits of Bacon’s
York’s Armory Show to Maastricht in March. No sooner do they
peer. That was snapped up by a prominent New York dealer on
finish unpacking their bags from Art Basel Switzerland in June
behalf of an anonymous investor for an unprecedented $142.4
than they begin booking their hotels for the Frieze in London
million, and had the market buzzing with speculation that the
in October. They then wrap up the year at Art Basel Miami in
same Russian oligarch who had set the previous record for a
December. At each of these events, new collectors join the
Merrill Lynch Wealth Management makes available products and services offered by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S) and other subsidiaries of Bank of America
Corporation (BAC).
The Private Banking and Investment Group is a division of MLPF&S that offers a broad array of personalized wealth management products and services. Both brokerage and investment
advisory services (including financial planning) are offered by the Group’s Private Wealth Advisors through MLPF&S. The nature and degree of advice and assistance provided, the fees
charged, and client rights and Merrill Lynch’s obligations will differ among these services. Investments involve risk, including the possible loss of principal investment.
The banking, credit and trust services sold by the Group’s Private Wealth Advisors are offered by licensed banks and trust companies, including Bank of America, N.A., member FDIC, and
other affiliated banks.
Investment products:
Are Not FDIC Insured
Are Not Bank Guaranteed
MLPF&S is a registered broker-dealer, a registered investment advisor, member SIPC and a wholly owned subsidiary of BAC.
May Lose Value
community. Some are the new new emerging-market rich
like the Russian billionaire rumored to be behind the Bacon
blockbuster, but the extravagant prices being witnessed in
some corners of the market are also due to the enthusiasm of
“ordinary” collectors: those with an investment portfolio in the
millions or tens of millions, with a passion for art and an
interest in investing some of their wealth in tangible assets.
The extravagant prices
being witnessed in some
corners of the market are
also due to the enthusiasm
of “ordinary” collectors.
“Never in my lifetime have collectors been so totally absorbed
picture. As of the end of November 2013, the All Art Index was
with the idea of playing the market,” says Thea Westreich, a
up just 2.2% for the year. The co-creator of the index, Michael
New York–based art advisor who has been working with affluent
Moses, notes that a big drag on the overall value has been an
collectors for decades. “The concept of art as an asset class has
ongoing slide in the prices for Old Masters (a category that
never been so much a part of the dialogue as it is today.”
includes Rembrandt and Vermeer as well as hundreds of other
lesser artists who are hardly household names), which were down
Indeed, even beyond the headline paydays, a case can be made
18.4% through the third quarter of the year. Postwar and
for art’s soundness as a legitimate investment-grade asset.
contemporary (+3.7%), traditional Chinese (+6.2%) and Impres-
From the beginning of 2002 through November 2013, the Mei
sionist and modern (+1.3%) were each up, but even in those
Moses® World All Art Index, which tracks repeat auction-house
categories the pace of the gains appears to have slowed from two
price results for major artists across all genres, was up 106%.
or three years ago when all categories substantially outperformed
That performance puts it roughly on par with the total return
the stock market in the aftermath of the financial crisis. “Clearly, at
for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index over the same period.
the very top of the market, there are too many very wealthy people chasing too few truly iconic works, which is driving up prices.
THE WINDS OF FASHION
If it continues, you might even call it a bubble,” says Moses. “What
Still, viewing art as an asset class can be tricky. The record-
you’re seeing further down the scale is really much more of a
setting sales and sticker shock at art fairs may give the impres-
normal market, with moderate gains and prices generally
sion that the entire art market is ablaze, but in fact the most
leveling off. Part of that, too, could be a function of more money
recent figures from the Mei Moses Index paint a more muted
starting to flow back into other assets like real estate and stocks.”
A Good Decade for Art: Over the past 10 years, the performance of the Mei Moses® World All Art Index, which tracks any
original work of art that has sold at least twice at Sotheby’s or Christie’s, compares favorably with that of the S&P Total Return.
Still, a variety of factors, including lack of liquidity, regulation and transparency, makes apples-to-apples comparisons difficult.
Notes Christopher J. Wolfe: “An index does not an allocation make.”
Change in value of each index, assuming a value of 1.0 in 2002.
3.0
Mei Moses World All Art Index
S&P 500 Total Return
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Source: Beautiful Asset Advisors® LLC (www.artasanasset.com)
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NO GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO INVEST IN AN INDEX.
VIEWPOINT
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
(through the
end of Nov.)
2
At the same time, Moses would be the first to acknowledge that
in an area as illiquid and lacking in transparency as the art market
all figures need to be taken with a grain of salt. The Mei Moses
Index tracks thousands of artists and works of art, and yet by definition some of these works may have changed hands only twice,
The art market depends
in large measure on the
unpredictable winds of fashion.
compared with the millions of shares of stock that are bought
To offer some context about how you can view an art invest-
and sold every day. In addition, while the index tracks sales at
ment, Wolfe cites the Merrill Lynch Wealth Allocation Framework,
auction, a greater number of transactions each year are complet-
which divides all of your assets into three distinct “buckets” (see
ed behind closed doors and never reported. In the contemporary
“A Framework for Your Art Investment,” page 4): The first includes
market, thought to be among today’s hottest areas, it’s estimated
the more conservative, reliable investments designed to meet such
that as much as 90% of sales are handled privately.
basic goals as wealth preservation and steady growth, while the
second includes assets with greater risk and potential to beat the
These aren’t the only factors complicating the art-as-an-asset
markets. Art fits squarely into a third bucket of aspirational invest-
discussion. Unlike more traditional asset classes where prices
ments that satisfy an aesthetic or personal goal and might (but
are based at least in part on fundamentals such as materials or
very well might not) result in a substantial change in your wealth,
energy costs, the art market depends in large measure on the
Wolfe says: “Art has a role if you already have a well-rounded and
unpredictable winds of fashion. A buzzed-about artist one year
balanced investment portfolio, and have cash left over.” Note,
can be a has-been the next, and choosing potential winners has
however, that the idea of using excess cash in no way implies a
nothing to do with financial modeling or asset-class analysis.
cavalier approach to the financial side of investing in art, he adds.
On the contrary, having a disciplined, structured framework for your
Even the laws of scarcity that seem to be doing so much to
art buying can make such investments more financially viable, even
drive prices at the top end of the market can be slippery when
as it makes you a more discerning collector.
extrapolated too broadly. While Francis Bacon and some other
established masters won’t be creating new work, historical
BUILDING AN ART PORTFOLIO
periods and styles can go in or out of favor, and each year
The best approach to building an art portfolio is to engage an
brings thousands of paintings from newcomers vying for
art advisor who has deep knowledge and insight into the market.
discovery as the next big thing. Unlike other tangible assets
This is especially important if you are a newcomer and unfamiliar
like gold or a choice piece of beachfront property, which have
with the territory. When it comes to buying art, the educated
intrinsic value, newer works of art could prove to be extremely
collector has the edge. “Knowledge trumps all,” says Westreich.
valuable or worth next to nothing, with the outcome depend-
That means being mindful of the history of art going back centu-
ing on many variables a collector can’t control. Subjective
ries and the evolution of art to the current day. It means delving
factors, from critics’ reviews to auction-house promotional
into great art and understanding its greatness, and participating
agendas to the changing direction of a major collector, can
in a conversation about the direction of art and what is moving
influence prices, often unpredictably.
it forward. From there you can follow your personal interests and
develop a connoisseurship and a keen eye for the art you want
WHERE ART FITS AMONG YOUR ASSETS
to collect. “Great art takes time to know with any degree of ac-
Each of these factors makes it difficult to apply standard
curacy,” says Westreich. “With careful attention and curiosity, col-
financial models to art investments, or to view them in the
lectors can make acquisitions based both on empirical evidence
same light as traditional asset classes such as equities or
and their desire to own the work.”
bonds. Although a work of art may well give you a sizable
return, “it’s difficult to depend on art to provide that return,”
Finding the intersection between what is personally meaning-
says Christopher J. Wolfe, chief investment officer, Private
ful and what has true value in the eyes of other buyers may be
Banking and Investment Group at Merrill Lynch.
one of the most important aspects—and biggest thrills—of
VIEWPOINT
3
collecting. “We ask a potential collector, ‘What is it that you
like, and would want to pass on to heirs?’” explains Jeff Rabin,
co-founder and principal of Artvest Partners, an independent
A Framework for Your
Art Investment
art advisory with a financial focus. While many people gravitate to one or two narrow areas, such as photography or
Impressionist painting, an advisor might suggest broadening
that perspective in category and medium. The advisor might
recommend that you expand your collecting to include prints
and drawings done by a favorite artist or pieces by a later
artist who was inspired by the work. Above all, he or she can
The Wealth Allocation Framework, originally developed at
Merrill Lynch in 2005 and revised in 2011, is intended to help
investors match their allocation strategies to their specific
goals. To do so, the framework encourages investors to think
about their portfolio in terms of three distinct buckets: No. 1,
designed to be risk averse enough to help ensure that they
will never have to worry about basic needs; No. 2, focused on
guide you when it comes to distinguishing a great work from
extending an expected lifestyle goal through tempered market
one that isn’t the best example of an artist’s oeuvre, and help
risk; and No. 3, higher risk and potentially higher rewards for
you to understand what the appropriate price is for an item
life’s loftier aspirations. Clearly, art falls into bucket No. 3. The
that you’re pondering for your collection, based on both the
return on a collection of up-and-coming contemporary artists,
caliber of the work and what’s going on in the market. The
for example, may be substantial enough to actually change
advisor can also help set and manage expectations for financial
performance. For those collectors who view their art as an
your lifestyle, but in no way should it be counted on or pursued
at the expense of buckets No. 1 and No. 2.
investment, one general rule is the same as with any financial
asset class: diversifying across artists and periods helps lower
“PERSONAL” RISK
the risk that often comes with a more concentrated focus.
Preserve Lifestyle
tions with major shows and retrospectives, can be compared
Safety
already entered the canon, having established their reputa-
Cash Flow
Rabin draws an analogy to stocks. If those artists who have
with blue-chip stocks, then emerging contemporary artists just
beginning to grab headlines are more akin to growth stocks:
Principal Protection
“Do Not Jeopardize
Basic Standard of
Living”
■ Minimize downside risk
■ Prioritize safety
■ Accept below-market returns
for minimal risk
much riskier, relatively inexpensive, but with a potential for high
“MARKET” RISK
reward, both financially and intellectually. A case in point might
be South African–born Marlene Dumas, only a few of whose
“Maintain Lifestyle”
works had reached the secondary auction market by the time
she was 50, in 2003. Until then, the record for sales of her work
at auction stood at only $50,000. But over the next few years,
demand for Dumas’ works ignited. One work painted only 19
Cash
Equities
All
Fixed
income
years earlier fetched $1.24 million at auction in 2004, and an-
■ B
alance risk and return
to attain market-level
performance from a broadly
diversified portfolio
other sold the following year for $3.34 million. By 2008, when
a third work sold for more than $5 million at a London sale,
“ASPIRATIONAL” RISK
Dumas’ works were fetching auction prices higher than those
for any other living female artist.
Outperform
works purchased for less than $50,000 have produced an
Outperform
is. In calculating his index, Moses has found that since 1950
Outperform
The pattern is borne out by the broad data, imperfect as it
“Enhance Lifestyle”
■ Maximize upside
■ Take measured risk to
achieve significant return
enhancement
average compound annual return of 8.8%, compared with
VIEWPOINT
4
4.4% for those for which collectors paid more than $1 million.
value, with total loans ranging from a few million dollars and
That should be music to the ears of beginning investor-
up, says Arena. Subsequent annual appraisals assess any shifts
collectors, but it does make it more important for you to
in value as the art market fluctuates, and the loan is adjusted
identify an advisor who can help build a stable, well-rounded
accordingly to minimize risk. Because art is so personal, inves-
collection and identify new artists who not only fit your in-
tors may understandably fear losing treasured works to the
terest and taste but are also compatible with your long-term
bank if a loan can’t be repaid. “We work very hard to prevent
goals and risk tolerance.
that,” Arena says. “The last thing anyone, including the bank,
wants is for the owners to lose a piece of art. We want them
ART FOR LIQUIDITY’S SAKE
to remain the stewards of the art.”
However seriously you choose to pursue art’s investment
potential, it makes sense to consider any piece already in your
The idea of stewardship calls up perhaps the most enriching
personal collection as a working component of your overall
aspect of art investment, as distinct from most other forms
wealth, says John Arena, an expert in fine art lending at U.S.
of investment. The added satisfaction comes from establish-
Trust. Unlike bonds or dividend stocks, art doesn’t produce
ing a collection that takes on an identity of its own, one that
regular income, but it can produce liquidity—be it to purchase
resonates with something deep inside you. “With the right
a vacation property or to expand your collection with more art.
guidance, you can enjoy some of the most exciting works in
the history of art,” Rabin says. “For as long as you have them,
The process starts when a third-party appraiser is called in to
they will inspire awe.” That’s a return on investment that can’t
value the art. Loans can reach 50% or more of the appraised
even be calculated.
VIEWPOINT
5
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The opinions, assumptions, estimates and views expressed are as of the date of this publication, are subject to change, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and
views of Bank of America Corporation or any of its affiliates. The information does not constitute advice for making any investment decision or its tax consequences and
is not intended as a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any investment product or service. Before acting on the information provided, you
should consider suitability for your circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice.
Nonfinancial assets, such as fine art, can be complex in nature and involve risks, including total loss of value. Special risk considerations include natural events
(for example, earthquakes or fires), complex tax considerations and lack of liquidity. Nonfinancial assets are not suitable for all investors. Always consult with your
independent attorney, tax advisor, investment manager and insurance agent for final recommendations and before changing or implementing any financial, tax or estate
planning strategy.
Credit facilities may be provided by Bank of America, N.A., Member FDIC, or other subsidiaries of Bank of America Corporation, each an Equal Opportunity Lender. All
loans and collateral are subject to credit approval and may require the filing of financing statements or other lien notices in public records. Asset-based financing involves
special risks and is not for everyone. A complete description of the loan terms will be found in the individual credit facility documentation and agreements. Clients
should consult with their own independent tax and legal advisors.
U.S. Trust operates through Bank of America, N.A. and other subsidiaries of Bank of America Corporation.
© 2014 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved. AREPJJTL