Krista Honkonen Adenoviral Gene Therapy for the Stimulation of Neovessel Growth New Treatment Strategies for Lymphedema and Peripheral Ischemia Publications of the University of Eastern Finland Dissertations in Health Sciences KRISTA HONKONEN Adenoviral Gene Therapy for the Stimulation of Neovessel Growth New Treatment Strategies for Lymphedema and Peripheral Ischemia To be presented by permission of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland for public examination in Mediteknia Auditorium, Kuopio, on Friday, May 29th 2015, at 12 noon Publications of the University of Eastern Finland Dissertations in Health Sciences Number 280 Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences Faculty of Health Sciences University of Eastern Finland Kuopio 2015 Grano Oy Kuopio, 2015 Series Editors: Professor Veli-Matti Kosma, M.D., Ph.D. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology Faculty of Health Sciences Professor Hannele Turunen, Ph.D. Department of Nursing Science Faculty of Health Sciences Professor Olli Gröhn, Ph.D. A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences Faculty of Health Sciences Professor Kai Kaarniranta, M.D., Ph.D. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Ophthalmology Faculty of Health Sciences Lecturer Veli-Pekka Ranta, Ph.D. (pharmacy) School of Pharmacy Faculty of Health Sciences Distributor: University of Eastern Finland Kuopio Campus Library P.O. Box 1627 FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland http://www.uef.fi/kirjasto ISBN (print): 978-952-61-1778-2 ISBN (pdf): 978-952-61-1779-9 ISSN (print): 1798-5706 ISSN (pdf): 1798-5714 ISSN-L: 1798-5706 III Author’s address: Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences Faculty of Health Sciences University of Eastern Finland P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 KUOPIO FINLAND Email: [email protected] Supervisors: Professor Seppo Ylä-Herttuala, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences Faculty of Health Sciences University of Eastern Finland KUOPIO FINLAND Johanna Lähteenvuo, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences Faculty of Health Sciences University of Eastern Finland KUOPIO FINLAND Reviewers: Professor Yulong He, M.Sc., Ph.D. Cyrus Tang Hematology Center Soochow University SUZHOU, JIANGSU CHINA Professor Juha-Pekka Salenius, M.D., Ph.D. Division of Vascular Surgery Department of Surgery Tampere University Hospital TAMPERE FINLAND Opponent: Docent Mikko Savontaus, M.D., Ph.D. Turku Centre for Biotechnology Åbo Akademi and University of Turku TURKU FINLAND IV V Honkonen, Krista Adenoviral Gene Therapy for the Stimulation of Neovessel Growth – New Treatment Strategies for Lymphedema and Peripheral ischemia University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Health Sciences Publications of the University of Eastern Finland. Dissertations in Health Sciences Number 280. 2015. 102 p. ISBN (print): 978-952-61-1778-2 ISBN (pdf): 978-952-61-1779-9 ISSN (print): 1798-5706 ISSN (pdf): 1798-5714 ISSN-L: 1798-5706 ABSTRACT In this thesis, stimulation of the growth of both lymphatic and blood vessels was studied in large animal models using adenovirally (Ad) delivered vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), which transcriptionally regulate a plethora of factors involved in angiogenesis, including VEGF-A isoforms. Two recognized lymphangiogenic growth factors, VEGF-C and VEGF-D, were employed to induce lymphatic vessel growth in a new large animal model of lymphedema. Lymphedema, which often develops as a consequence of the surgical removal of cancer or radiation therapy, lacks curative treatments, thus making the application of gene therapy to repair lymphatic damage an attractive new treatment option for the patients suffering from this condition. Both AdVEGF-C and AdVEGF-D were shown to induce lymphatic vessel regrowth and, consequently, improve lymphatic flow in the pig model of lymphedema, where lymphatic damage was first caused by excising all of the lymphatic vessels around an inguinal lymph node. Interestingly, AdVEGF-D was found to evoke more pronounced blood vascular effects than AdVEGF-C. Therefore, VEGF-C gene therapy was selected for further evaluation and optimization in the same large animal model of lymphedema. A subsequent comparison was performed of VEGF-C gene transfer into the lymph node versus into the fat surrounding the lymph node in terms of efficacy and adverse effects. The regeneration of lymphatic vessels was equally effective regardless of the gene transfer site. However, gene transfer into the fat surrounding the lymph node was found to have less adverse effects on the node. In the final part of this thesis, HIF-1α and HIF-2α, which are upstream regulators of VEGF-A expression, were adenovirally delivered to mouse myocardium and ischemic rabbit hindlimbs to evaluate their capability to induce blood vessel growth. Patients with cardiovascular disease are becoming increasingly older and suffering additional comorbid conditions, i.e. they may not withstand the current invasive procedures but would be suitable for these emerging alternative treatment options. Both of the transcription factors increased blood capillary size and perfusion in skeletal muscles. Additionally, HIF-1α gene transfer enhanced the recovery of ischemic muscles from energy depletion induced by electrical stimulation. In conclusion, adenovirally delivered VEGF family members VEGF-C and VEGF-D efficiently induce lymphangiogenesis, which results in improved lymphatic flow, whereas AdHIF-1α triggers angiogenesis, which is sufficient to improve energy metabolism of ischemic muscles. National Library of Medicine Classification: QU 107, QU 560, QZ 170, WG 500, WH 700 Medical Subject Headings: Lymphangiogenesis; Blood Vessels/growth & development; Angiogenesis Inducing Agents; Genetic Therapy; Adenoviridae; Gene Transfer Techniques; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Lymphedema/therapy; Ischemia/therapy; Therapies, Investigational; Disease Models, Animal VI VII Honkonen, Krista Adenovirusvälitteinen geeniterapia uudissuonten kasvattamiseksi – uusia hoitomenetelmiä lymfedeemaan ja alaraajaiskemiaan Itä-Suomen yliopisto, terveystieteiden tiedekunta Publications of the University of Eastern Finland. Dissertations in Health Sciences Numero 280. 2015. 102 s. ISBN (print): 978-952-61-1778-2 ISBN (pdf): 978-952-61-1779-9 ISSN (print): 1798-5706 ISSN (pdf): 1798-5714 ISSN-L: 1798-5706 TIIVISTELMÄ Tässä väitöskirjassa tutkittiin adenovirusvälitteisesti (Ad) yliekspressoitujen verisuonen endoteelin kasvutekijäperheen (vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF) jäsenten sekä hapenpuutteessa aktivoituvien transkriptiotekijöiden (hypoxia-inducible factor, HIF) kykyä saada aikaan imu- ja verisuonten uudiskasvua isoeläinmalleissa. HIF-1α ja HIF-2α säätelevät useita verisuonten uudismuodostukseen osallistuvia tekijöitä, mukaan lukien VEGF-A:ta. Väitöskirjan ensimmäisessä osatyössä kehitettiin uusi lymfedeeman isoeläinmalli, jonka avulla tutkittiin tunnettujen lymfangiogeneettisten kasvutekijöiden VEGF-C:n ja VEGF-D:n kykyä aikaansaada imusuonten uudismuodostusta imunestekierron parantamiseksi. Lymfedeema eli imunesteturvotus kehittyy usein syövän kirurgisen poiston tai sädetyksen seurauksena, eikä siihen ole olemassa parantavaa hoitoa. Imusuonten uudismuodostus geeniterapian avulla voisi tarjota uuden hoitovaihtoehdon lymfedeemasta kärsiville potilaille. Lymfedeema aiheutettiin tuhoamalla sian nivusen imusolmuketta ympäröivät imutiet, minkä jälkeen imusolmukkeeseen tehtiin AdVEGF-C- tai AdVEGF-D-geeninsiirto. Molemmat kasvutekijät saivat aikaan voimakasta imusuonten muodostusta ja paransivat imunestekiertoa, mutta VEGF-D:n havaittiin aiheuttavan lisäksi huomattavia verisuonivaikutuksia. Tästä johtuen VEGF-C valikoitui toisen osatyön kohteeksi, jossa verrattiin imusolmukkeen sisään tehtyä AdVEGF-C-geeninsiirtoa imusolmuketta ympäröivään rasvaan tehtyyn geeniinsiirtoon tehokkuuden ja haittavaikutusten osalta. Imusuonten uudiskasvu oli yhtä tehokasta geeninsiirtopaikasta riippumatta, mutta rasvaan tehdyn geeninsiirron havaittiin olevan suotuisampi imusolmukkeen kannalta. Väitöskirjan viimeisessä osatyössä tutkittiin AdHIF-1α:n ja AdHIF-2α:n kykyä saada aikaan verisuonten uudiskasvua hiiren sydämessä ja kanin hapenpuutteesta kärsivässä takaraajassa. Sydän- ja verisuonitautipotilaat ovat yhä vanhempia ja kärsivät usein liitännäissairauksista, mikä rajoittaa nykyisten kajoaviavien hoitotoimenpiteiden käyttöä heidän kohdallaan ja luo tarpeen vaihtoehtoisten hoitomuotojen kehittämiselle. Molemmat transkriptiotekijät HIF-1α ja HIF-2α saivat aikaan verisuonikapillaarien laajentumista ja verenkierron lisääntymistä luurankolihaksessa. Lisäksi AdHIF-1α-geeninsiirron osoitettiin parantavan iskeemisen lihaksen energiavarastojen palautumista sähköisesti tuotetun lihassupistelun aiheuttamasta energiavajeesta. Yhteenvetona voidaan todeta, että adenovirusvälitteinen geeninsiirto VEGF-C:llä tai VEGF-D:llä johtaa voimakkaaseen imusuonten uudismuodostukseen sekä parantuneeseen imunestekiertoon, kun taas AdHIF-1α aikaansaa verisuonten uudiskasvua, joka on riittävää parantamaan hapenpuutteesta kärsivän lihaksen palautumista rasituksesta. Luokitus: QU 107, QU 560, QZ 170, WG 500, WH 700 Yleinen Suomalainen asiasanasto: imusuonisto; verisuonet; kasvutekijät; angiogeneesi; geeniterapia; adenovirukset; hoitomenetelmät; lymfedeema; iskemia; koe-eläinmallit VIII IX Acknowledgements This thesis work was carried out in the Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland during the years 2008-2014. Overall, it was immensely exciting to be able to contribute something to this branch of science, but this was made even more so by the great people who mentored and assisted me along the way. First and foremost I wish to thank Professor Seppo Ylä-Herttuala for giving me the chance to work in this group back in 2008 as a first-year medical student. Despite me being practically a “tabula rasa” in the academic world, you allowed me to find my own path and orient towards the research topics that appealed to me. Your enthusiasm and reassurances kept my spirits up at times when desperation was raising its head. I also want to acknowledge Anne Saaristo for her hands-on mentoring, thoughtful insights and prompt solutions to whatever problems arose with the first and second publications of this thesis. You introduced me to the world of lymphatics and included me into your projects, for which I will be forever grateful. I wish to thank Henna Niemi for taking me under her wing when I first arrived in the group and for teaching me a large part of the laboratory methods employed in this thesis, thus aiding me to become more independent as a researcher. I would also like to thank Johanna Lähteenvuo for her supervision of this thesis, but above all, for letting me take part in her large animal studies and her ever-so-helpful attitude towards me. I owe my gratitude to Markku Lähteenvuo for being one of my closest collaborators during my years in AIVI. Our discussions, whether about science or something completely different, always gave me a lot to think about. I was privileged to have Professor Yulong He and Professor Juha-Pekka Salenius as thesis pre-examiners and wish to formally acknowledge them for their time and valuable advice in improving this thesis. I would also like to thank Dr. Ewen MacDonald for his excellent services in English-language proofreading. My sincere gratitude goes to all the co-authors and colleagues without whom this thesis would not have been possible. I would specifically like to thank Tomi Tervala for his contributions to the execution of the two lymphatic studies and Mikko Visuri for his meticulous refining of the second publication. Suvi Jauhiainen and Jari Lappalainen are appreciated for their assistance with the experiments required for the revision of the first publication. In addition, it was an honor to be able to collaborate and learn from such enthusiastic and goal-oriented researchers as Tuomas Rissanen and Petra KorpisaloPirinen. Special thank-yous are sent to the summer workers Heikki Junkkari and Nina Knuutinen for their help with the practical work, as well as for my previous summer worker, now a PhD student, Paavo Halonen for his participation in the lymphatic studies. Completing a thesis requires input from a veritable army of people and none of it would have been possible without the sublime expertise of the technical staff. I am indebted to Heikki Pekonen, Heikki Karhunen and Minna Törrönen for their invaluable assistance in the experiments conducted at the Lab Animal Centre. I extend my gratitude to all the technicians in AIVI and in particular to the following people: Seija Sahrio and Anneli Miettinen for all the technical help in the laboratory over the years; Pekka Alakuijala, Jouko Mäkäräinen and Jari Nissinen for assisting with computer- and workroom- related issues; and Tiina Koponen and Sari Järveläinen for providing the adenoviruses used in these studies. I also wish to express my heartfelt gratitude to Helena Pernu, Marja Poikolainen and Jatta Pitkänen for their kind and patient guidance in various practical and administrative issues over the years. X I hold in high regard all the past and present members of the SYH-group, most of whom I’ve gone to for assistance at least once during my time in the group. Line LottonenRaikaslehto, thank you for becoming my friend as our paths intertwined both in the research world and in medical school. Aside from research colleagues, I wish thank my parents Anne-Marie and Ari for their constant support, encouragement and confidence in me. Without you, I would have never enjoyed so many opportunities in life. Katrine and Riina, you are the best little sisters anyone could hope for. Thank you, Kati, for staying a close godmother through my life, and Airi, my grandmother, for always inviting us over when we are nearby. Finally, my deepest gratitude goes to Henri, my partner in life and co-worker in the SYH-group. You have been a never-ending source of support to me and an amazing father to our son. The last five years with you have been the most rewarding of my life and I hope there are many great years ahead for us. Linus, my darling son, you brought a whole new meaning to my life when you arrived a year ago. You are the biggest source of joy and pride and put a smile on my face every day. Kuopio, April 2015 Krista Honkonen This work was supported by grants from the Graduate School of Molecular Medicine (University of Eastern Finland), TEKES, Ark Therapeutics Ltd, Academy of Finland, Finnish Medical Foundation, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Emil Aaltonen Foundation, Instrumentarium Science Foundation, Ida Montini Foundation, Aarne and Aili Turunen . Foundation. XI List of the original publications This dissertation is based on the following original publications: I Lähteenvuo M*, Honkonen K*, Tervala T*, Tammela T, Suominen E, Lähteenvuo J, Kholová I, Alitalo K, Ylä-Herttuala S, Saaristo A. Growth factor therapy and autologous lymph node transfer in lymphedema. Circulation 123: 613-620, 2011. II Honkonen KM, Visuri MT, Tervala TV, Halonen PJ, Koivisto M, Lähteenvuo MT, Alitalo KK, Ylä-Herttuala S, Saaristo AM. Lymph node transfer and perinodal lymphatic growth factor treatment for lymphedema. Annals of Surgery 257: 961967, 2013. III Niemi H, Honkonen K, Korpisalo P, Huusko J, Kansanen E, Merentie M, Rissanen TT, André H, Pereira T, Poellinger L, Alitalo K, Ylä-Herttuala S. HIF-1α and HIF-2α induce angiogenesis and improve muscle energy recovery. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 44: 989-99, 2014. * Authors with equal contribution The publications were adapted with the permission of the copyright owners. XII XIII Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ................................................................................................. 3 2.1 DISEASES OF THE BLOOD AND LYMPHATIC VASCULAR SYSTEM ............................ 3 2.1.1 Atherosclerosis .................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 Peripheral arterial disease ................................................................................................. 3 2.1.3 Coronary artery disease ..................................................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Lymphedema....................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.4.1 Primary lymphedema .............................................................................................. 7 2.1.4.2 Secondary lymphedema .......................................................................................... 8 2.1.5 Tumor lymphangiogenesis and metastasis ................................................................... 10 2.1.6 Other lymphatic vasculature-associated diseases ........................................................ 11 2.2 THE BLOOD VASCULAR SYSTEM AND BLOOD VESSEL GROWTH ........................... 12 2.2.1 Structure and function of the blood vascular system .................................................. 12 2.2.2 Blood vessel components................................................................................................. 13 2.2.3 Vasculogenesis .................................................................................................................. 14 2.2.4 Angiogenesis ..................................................................................................................... 15 2.2.5 Arteriogenesis.................................................................................................................... 16 2.3 THE LYMPHATIC SYSTEM AND LYMPHATIC VESSEL GROWTH............................... 17 2.3.1 Anatomy and function of the lymphatic system .......................................................... 17 2.3.2 Lymphangiogenesis.......................................................................................................... 19 2.3.3 Lymphatic vessel markers ............................................................................................... 21 2.3.4 Lymph nodes ..................................................................................................................... 21 2.4 MOLECULAR REGULATION OF BLOOD AND LYMPHATIC VESSEL GROWTH ..... 23 2.4.1 Hypoxia-inducible factors ............................................................................................... 23 2.4.2 Vascular endothelial growth factors and their receptors ............................................ 25 2.4.2.1 VEGF-A .................................................................................................................... 26 2.4.2.2 VEGF-B..................................................................................................................... 27 2.4.2.3 VEGF-C .................................................................................................................... 27 2.4.2.4 VEGF-D .................................................................................................................... 28 2.4.2.5 PlGF .......................................................................................................................... 28 2.4.2.6 VEGF-receptors....................................................................................................... 28 2.4.2.7 NRP-receptors ......................................................................................................... 30 2.5 GENE THERAPY ........................................................................................................................ 30 2.5.1 Viral vectors ....................................................................................................................... 31 2.5.1.1 Adenoviral vectors ................................................................................................. 32 2.5.1.2 Other viral vectors .................................................................................................. 33 2.5.2 Non-viral vectors .............................................................................................................. 34 2.5.3 Safety issues in gene therapy .......................................................................................... 34 2.6 PRECLINICAL AND CLINICAL STUDIES ............................................................................ 35 2.6.1 Preclinical studies of lymphedema ................................................................................ 35 2.6.2 Preclinical studies of proangiogenic therapy for PAD ................................................ 36 2.6.3 Clinical studies of proangiogenic therapy for PAD ..................................................... 37 3 AIMS OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................ 39 XIV 4 MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................................. 41 4.1 ANIMAL MODELS..................................................................................................................... 41 4.1.1 Pig model of lymphedema (I-II) ..................................................................................... 41 4.1.2 Rabbit model of hind limb ischemia (III) ...................................................................... 41 4.2 GENE TRANSFER METHODS ................................................................................................. 42 4.2.1 Intranodal and perinodal gene transfers (I-II) .............................................................. 42 4.2.2 Intramuscular gene transfer (I, III) ................................................................................. 42 4.2.3 Myocardial gene transfer (III) ......................................................................................... 43 4.3 X-RAY IMAGING ....................................................................................................................... 43 4.3.1 Lymphangiography (I-II) ................................................................................................. 43 4.3.2 Digital subtraction angiography (III) ............................................................................. 43 4.4 ULTRASOUND IMAGING ....................................................................................................... 44 4.5 31P-MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY................................................................. 44 4.6 VASCULAR PERMEABILITY AND TISSUE EDEMA .......................................................... 46 4.6.1 Seroma fluid evaluation (I-II) .......................................................................................... 46 4.6.2 Modified Miles Assay (I, III) ........................................................................................... 46 4.7 PROTEIN ANALYSES................................................................................................................ 46 4.7.1 Western Blot (I, III) ........................................................................................................... 46 4.7.2 ELISA (I) ............................................................................................................................. 46 4.8 mRNA EXPRESSION ................................................................................................................. 47 4.9 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY AND HISTOLOGY .............................................................. 47 4.10 ASSESSMENT OF LYMPHATIC FUNCTION ..................................................................... 49 4.11 STATISTICAL ANALYSES...................................................................................................... 49 5 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 51 5.1 THERAPEUTIC LYMPHANGIOGENESIS FOR LYMPHEDEMA (I) ................................ 51 5.1.1 Lymphatic vessel regrowth induced by AdVEGF-C and AdVEGF-D ..................... 51 5.1.2 Lymphatic transport 2 months after AdVEGF-C and AdVEGF-D treatment ......... 52 5.1.3 Increased seroma formation following AdVEGF-D gene transfer ............................ 53 5.1.4 Histopathological evaluation of safety samples ........................................................... 54 5.2 OPTIMIZING ADVEGF-C THERAPY FOR LYMPHEDEMA (II) ....................................... 54 5.2.1 Lymphatic neovessel growth induced by intranodal and perinodal AdVEGF-C .. 54 5.2.2 Effects of intranodal and perinodal AdVEGF-C on lymph node preservation and seroma formation ....................................................................................................................... 57 5.2.3 Macrophage accumulation inside the lymph node following intranodal GT ......... 57 5.3 THERAPEUTIC ANGIOGENESIS VIA OVER-EXPRESSION OF HIFS (III) ..................... 58 5.3.1 Angiogenic response following AdHIF-1α and AdHIF-2α GTs ............................... 58 5.3.2 Effects of AdHIFs on muscle energy metabolism ........................................................ 60 5.3.3 Upregulation of HIF target genes following AdHIF-1α and AdHIF-2α GTs .......... 60 6 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................ 61 6.1 LYMPHANGIOGENIC GENE THERAPY FOR LYMPHEDEMA (I-II) ............................. 61 6.2 PHYSIOLOGICAL ANGIOGENESIS INDUCED BY HIFS (III) .......................................... 64 7 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES ................................................................ 67 8 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................ 69 APPENDIX: ORIGINAL PUBLICATIONS I-III XV Abbreviations 31 Phosphorus-magnetic resonance spectroscopy ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay AAV Adeno-associated virus eNOS ABI Ankle-brachial index Endothelial nitric oxide synthase Ad Adenoviral EPC Endothelial progenitor cell ANG Angiopoietin FDA ANOVA Analysis of variance The U.S. Food and Drug Administration APC Antigen-presenting cell FGF Fibroblast growth factor ApoE Apolipoprotein E FIH ATP Adenosine triphosphate Factor inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor 1 BM Basement membrane FOXC2 BM-EPC Bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cell Forkhead box C2 transcription factor fps Frames per second GATA2 GATA binding protein 2 GJC2 Gap junction protein, gamma 2 31 P-MRS CABG Coronary artery bypass grafting CAD Coronary artery disease CAR Coxsackie-adenovirus receptor GMP Good manufacturing practice GT Gene transfer Collagen and calcium binding EGF domains 1 HAM Human alveolar macrophage HDL High-density lipoprotein CD Cluster of differentiation HGF Hepatocyte growth factor cDNA Complementary DNA HIF Hypoxia-inducible factor CLEC-2 C-type lectin domain family 2 HLA Human leukocyte antigen CLI Critical limb ischemia HLT cm Cubic centimetre Hypotrichosis-lymphedematelangiectasia CMV Cytomegalovirus HRE Hypoxia-response element COUP-TFII Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor 2 HRP Horseradish peroxidase HSPG Heparan sulfate proteoglycans CPS Contrast pulse sequence HUVEC DAB Diaminobenzidine Human umbilical vein endothelial cell DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid IgG Immunoglobulin G DSA Digital subtraction angiography i.v. Intravenous KAT Kuopio Angiogenesis Trial E10.5 Embryonic day 10.5 kbp Kilobase pair EC Endothelial cell KIF11 Kinesin family member 11 EF% Ejection fraction KSHV Kaposi sarcoma herpes virus CCBE1 3 XVI LAM Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Pi Inorganic phosphate LacZ β-Galactosidase PlGF Placental growth factor LD Lymphedema-distichiasis ppm Parts per million LDL Low-density lipoprotein PROX1 LEAD Lower extremity arterial disease Prospero-related homeobox transcription factor 1 PTPN14 Protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 14 pVHL Von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein LEC Lymphatic endothelial cell LV Lymphatic vessel LVAW Left ventricle anterior wall LYVE-1 Lymphatic vascular endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 Q-Q Quantile-quantile RCT Reverse cholesterol transport RNA Ribonucleic acid M. Musculus SCID mL Milliliter Severe combined immunodeficiency MLD Manual lymphatic drainage SD Standard deviation mm Millimeter SEM Standard error of mean MOI Multiplicity of infection siRNA Small interfering RNA mRNA Messenger RNA SLP76 NFATc1 Nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin dependent 1 SH2 domain-containing leukocyte protein of 76kDa SMC Smooth muscle cell SOX18 Sex determining region Y box 18 transcription factor sVEGFR Soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor NF-κB Nuclear factor kappa-lightchain-enhancer of activated B cells nm Nanometer NO Nitric oxide SYK Spleen tyrosine kinase NRP Neuropilin TIE1 ns Non-significant O2 Oxygen Tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin-like and EGF-like domains 1 PAD Peripheral arterial disease TSA Tyramide signal amplification PCI Percutaneous coronary intervention VEGF Vascular endothelial growth factor PCr Phosphocreatine VEGFR PCR Polymerase chain reaction Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor PDGF Platelet-derived growth factor vp Viral particles PDK1 Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, isozyme 1 μL PECAM-1 Platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 pfu Plaque-forming units pH Power of hydrogen Microliter μm 2 Square micrometer 1 Introduction Gene therapy comprises a set of strategies which modify the expression of specific genes in an attempt to treat or prevent diseases. Although still in its infancy, it holds promise for treating a wide range of diseases, including several cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovascular diseases are still the leading cause of death globally, despite major progress in current treatment practices (WHO 2014). The pathophysiology of these diseases involves a process called atherosclerosis, in which lipid accumulation and inflammation lead to a gradual occlusion of arteries and consequently to ischemia (Libby 2002). Cardiovascular gene therapy aims at stimulating vascular growth in order to ensure sufficient blood flow to the tissue suffering from ischemia (Yla-Herttuala, Martin 2000). This can be achieved by therapeutically over-expressing proteins that are essential for the formation of new blood vasculature. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) govern the sprouting of new blood vessels from pre-existing vessels, termed as angiogenesis, and they have been widely used for vascular therapeutic purposes (Ribatti, Crivellato 2012). A single administration of VEGF-A evokes intense angiogenic effects, but also can evoke severe side effects such as tissue edema (Rissanen et al. 2005). Therefore, it has been postulated that upstream regulators of VEGF expression, such as hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), would represent a better therapeutic target than a single angiogenic factor since HIFs are able to activate multiple angiogenic growth factors as well as regulating many of the genes involved in energy metabolism and recovery of ischemic tissues (Semenza 2012). As a result of multiple growth factors working in harmony, the angiogenic response may be more physiological than anything that can be achieved by one individual factor. Parallel to blood vascular circulatory system in mammals there exists another vascular network that transports a plasma-derived, milk-like fluid called lymph from the peripheral tissues back to the central blood circulation (Breslin 2014). Insufficiency of this lymphatic vascular system may lead to lymphedema, which is a debilitating condition characterized by gross swelling of the affected part of the body (Warren et al. 2007). In the industrialized countries, lymphedema often develops as a consequence of surgical or radiotherapeutic interventions for cancer (Rockson, Rivera 2008). Apart from cardiovascular gene therapy, where angiogenic growth factors are administered to achieve therapeutic blood vessel growth in ischemic tissues, gene therapy may also be employed to stimulate the growth of new lymphatic vessels and thus to ameliorate the symptoms of lymphedema. Two vascular endothelial growth factor family members, VEGF-C and VEGF-D, are known to be stimulators of lymphangiogenesis; these factors have been demonstrated to restore lymphatic drainage to a site of lymphatic damage in experimental rodent models (Tammela et al. 2007, Yoon et al. 2003, Szuba et al. 2002). The aim of this thesis was to utilize large animal models to clarify the lymphangiogenic potential of two adenovirally delivered single growth factors, VEGF-C and VEGF-D, and moreover, to study whether the adenoviral application of a “master-switch” agent, such as HIF1α/-2α, which is responsible for the coordinated induction of multiple angiogenic factors, would lead to a more physiological response than could be achieved with the administration of a single growth factor, such as VEGF-A. 2 3 2 Review of the literature 2.1 DISEASES OF THE BLOOD AND LYMPHATIC VASCULAR SYSTEM 2.1.1 Atherosclerosis Atherosclerosis is a disease of large arteries and the underlying pathogenic process behind ischemia affecting the lower extremities, the heart and the brain. There are several recognized risk factors for atherosclerosis including high serum LDL (low-density lipoprotein) and low HDL (high-density lipoprotein) levels, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, obesity and lack of exercise. The atherosclerotic process involves the accumulation of lipids into the subendothelial space, the infiltration of inflammatory cells, intracellular lipid accumulation in macrophages and smooth muscle cells (SMCs), the migration and proliferation of medial SMCs within the inflamed intima, fibrous cap formation, and finally calcification and neovascularization within the plaque. (Libby 2002, Lusis 2000.) Initially, the lesion grows towards the adventitia until, after a certain point, it begins to protrude into and obstruct the vessel lumen (Lusis 2000). The progressive narrowing of the arterial lumen impairs blood flow and leads to the first clinical manifestations: ischemic pain at stress and later also at rest. Rupture of an atherosclerotic lesion and the concomitant thrombosis are responsible for major cardiovascular events, such as sudden death, myocardial infarction or stroke. (Libby 2002.) Although the root cause of the inflammatory process remains as yet undefined, endothelial dysfunction is considered to be the preceding step prior to LDL entry within the arterial intima, and thus, it can be considered as the basis for the development of angiopathy (Badimon, Vilahur 2012). 2.1.2 Peripheral arterial disease Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) refers to the narrowing of arteries distal to the arch of aorta, including carotid, vertebral, upper extremity, mesenteric, renal and lower extremity vascular sites (Figure 1) (European Stroke Organisation 2011). The total disease prevalence ranges between 3 and 15% increasing up to 20% with age (Norgren et al. 2007). The risk factors for PAD include the typical risk factors for atherosclerotic disease, such as smoking, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia (European Stroke Organisation et al. 2011). The lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) has different presentations that can be categorized according to the Fontaine (stages I-IV) or the Rutherford classification (grades 0-III). The most typical symptom is intermittent claudication: pain in the calves that increases with walking and disappears quickly at rest (Fontaine stage II, Rutherford grade I). In more severe cases, pain is present at rest (Fontaine stage III, Rutherford grade II). Severe ischemia is evidenced by ulcers and gangrene, typically presenting in the distal part of the limb (Fontaine stage IV, Rutherford grade III). Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is defined as the presence of ischemic rest pain for more than 2 weeks or ischemic skin lesions, either ulcers or gangrene. Acute limb ischemia may occur following an embolic event or local thrombosis and has a 10 - 30% 30-day amputation rate. (Norgren et al. 2007.) The primary test for the diagnosis of LEAD is the ankle-brachial index (ABI), i.e. the ratio of ankle and brachial systolic blood pressures (European Stroke Organisation 2011). A value of < 0.9, indicative of a hemodynamically-significant arterial stenosis, is 95% sensitive and 99% specific for the diagnosis of LEAD (McDermott et al. 2002). Moreover, a reduced ABI has prognostic value in identifying persons at risk for suffering cardiovascular morbidity and 4 mortality (Hirsch et al. 2006). A very high ABI (> 1.4) in relation to stiff (calcified) arteries is also associated with increased mortality (Criqui et al. 2010). The conservative treatment of PAD includes smoking cessation, dietary therapy aiming at weight reduction, exercise and pharmacotherapy comprising antiplatelet agents, lipid-lowering agents and antihypertensive drugs (European Stroke Organisation 2011). In addition, vasodilators such as cilostazol and naftidrofuryl, may have a mild-to-moderate effect to improve walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication (Pande et al. 2010, De Backer et al. 2009). Revascularization is considered in patients with CLI or severely debilitating claudication when the response to conservative therapy has been inadequate (O'Donnell et al. 2011). Angioplasty is preferred for single short stenoses in the common iliac artery, whereas endovascular or open vascular surgery utilizing vein grafts or synthetic prostheses are best suited for diffuse occlusive disease (European Stroke Organisation 2011). Bypass surgery appears to have a better long-term patency than endovascular interventions, although the risks of surgery are greater in terms of mortality rates, major complications and technical success rate (European Stroke Organisation 2011, Norgren et al. 2007). Amputation remains the final option to resolve irreversible limb ischemia, particularly in the case of infectious gangrene or extensive necrosis. One year after the onset of CLI, 25% of patients will have died and 25% will have required a major amputation. (Norgren et al. 2007.) Figure 1. Magnetic resonance angiography of a patient with PAD. The double-ended arrow marks the superficial femoral artery that is severely stenosed on the right and occluded on the left. Small arrows point to collaterals arising from the deep femoral artery. Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature Reviews Cardiology, Lau et al., “Peripheral artery disease. Part 1: clinical evaluation and noninvasive diagnosis” © 2011. 2.1.3 Coronary artery disease Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in both high- and low-income countries, with 7.2 million people dying of coronary artery disease (CAD) alone in 2002 (WHO 2014). With respect to all the cardiovascular diseases, CAD is the most prevalent manifestation with clinical presentations including silent ischemia, stable and unstable angina pectoris, myocardial 5 infarction, heart failure and sudden cardiac death (Kumar, Abbas & Fausto 2005). These are generally caused by a progressive encroachment of the arterial lumen leading to stenosis or acute plaque rupture with thrombosis, with or without concomitant vasoconstriction. A 75% reduction in the cross-sectional area of the lumen induces symptoms during exertion, whereas an occlusion exceeding 90% leads to insufficient coronary flow at rest. (Kumar, Abbas & Fausto 2005, Grech 2003.) Primary interventional therapies for coronary insufficiency are percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). CABG remains the treatment of choice for patients with severe CAD, i.e. those with left main coronary artery disease or three-vessel disease. (Levine et al. 2011, Serruys et al. 2009.) For PCI, a focal stenosis on a straight artery without involvement of major side branches is ideal (O'Toole, Grech 2003). Patients unsuitable for revascularization procedures form a heterogenous group with annualized mortality rates ranging from 3% to 21%. Nonsuitability for revascularization may be due to anatomical reasons, such as diffuse thread-like coronary atherosclerosis, or nonanatomical factors including excessive comorbidities, procedural risk and poor compliance to medication. (Jolicoeur et al. 2012.) 2.1.4 Lymphedema The lymphatic vessels play a key role in the regulation of tissue fluid homeostasis and immune functions of the body (Alitalo 2011, Witte, Witte 1987). Blockage of lymphatic drainage due to infection, surgery, cancer or a genetic defect leads to lymphedema, which manifests as disfiguring and gross swelling of the extremities (Figure 2) (Warren et al. 2007). Edema develops as plasma proteins leak into the interstitium raising the colloid osmotic pressure of the interstitial fluid, which draws even more fluid out of the capillaries (Guyton, Hall 2006). Lymphedema is usually a progressive, chronic condition that is often complicated by recurrent lymphangitis, cellulitis, or in rare cases, cutaneous malignant tumors (Szuba, Rockson 1998). In the stage I clinical classification of lymphedema, the swelling, which consists of protein-rich fluid, is considered to be reversible simply by limb elevation, whereas in stage II, the affected tissue hardens as a result of inflammation, fibrosis, adipose tissue hypertrophy and scarring, eventually becoming irreversible. Advanced lymphedema (stage III) refers to lymphostatic elephantiasis, cartilaginous hardening with hyperkeratosis and papillomatous outgrowths of the skin. (International Society of Lymphology 2009.) Lymphedemas are etiologically divided into two categories: Primary lymphedemas are caused by rare congenital defects and can develop in utero, neonatally, or years or decades after birth, whereas the more common secondary lymphedemas are caused by disruption of a normal lymphatic system by disease or an iatrogenic process (Warren et al. 2007). Different types of lymphedema, mutated genes identified as being involved or other causes, as well as clinical manifestations are listed in table 1. 6 Figure 2. Lymphedema of the lower limbs. Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature Genetics, Ostergaard et al., “Mutations in GATA2 cause primary lymphedema associated with a predisposition to acute myeloid leukemia (Emberger syndrome)”, © 2011. Table 1. Various lymphedema syndromes, their causes or causative mutations and clinical findings. Disease Cause/Mutation Manifestations Lymphedema-distichiasis FOXC2 Lymphedema of lower extremities, double row of eyelashes, additional complications, e.g. ptosis Primary congenital lymphedema / Nonne-Milroy lymphedema VEGFR3 Congenital lymphedema of lower limbs Milroy-like disease VEGFC Congenital lymphedema of lower limbs Hypotrichosis-lymphedematelangiectasia syndrome SOX18 Lymphedema, alopecia, telangiectasias Meige disease / lymphedema praecox GJC2 Lymphedema affecting all 4 extremities, onset typically at <15 years of age Hennekam syndrome CCBE1 Lymphedema, intestinal lymphangiectasias, mental retardation, dysmorphic facial features Lymphedema-choanal atresia PTPN14 Lymphedema of lower extremities in children, blockage of choanae Emberger syndrome GATA2 Lymphedema of lower extremities and genitals, hematological abnormalities, deafness MCLMR KIF11 Microcephaly with or without chorioretinopathy, lymphedema, or mental retardation Filariasis Parasite infection Lymphedema of lower extremities and genitals Cancer-related lymphedema Surgical or radiation therapy of cancer Lymphedema of extremities or trunk depending on the location, type and treatment of cancer 7 2.1.4.1 Primary lymphedema The prevalence of primary lymphedema has been estimated at 1.15 per 100000 persons less than 20 years of age (Smeltzer, Stickler & Schirger 1985). To date, at least 9 genes responsible for different isolated or syndromic forms of primary lymphedema have been identified with the help of genetic studies and genetically modified mouse models (table 1). Intriguingly, most of the proteins encoded by these genes are linked to the VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 (Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3) signaling axis. Overall, genetic mutations in 8 specific genes have been estimated to account for the etiology of 40% of familial lymphedema and 10% of the sporadic occurrences, which together account for less than 25% of patients with lymphedema. (Brouillard, Boon & Vikkula 2014, Mendola et al. 2013.) The most common form of primary lymphedema is lymphedema-distichiasis (LD), which is an autosomal-dominant disorder caused by loss-of-function mutations affecting the forkhead transcription factor (FOXC2) (Fang et al. 2000). Transcription factors, such as FOXC2, cause syndromic forms of lymphedema by acting downstream of VEGFR-3 and affecting several target genes (Brouillard, Boon & Vikkula 2014). LD is characterized by late-onset lymphedema of the lower extremities and a congenital double row of eyelashes (distichiasis) occurring in 94100% of the patients, with additional complications including varicose veins, ptosis, extradural cysts, cardiac defects, and cleft palate. In this disease, lymphedema develops as a result of lymph reflux, which is likely due to a primary valve failure. (Connell, Brice & Mortimer 2008.) Foxc2-/- mice have been found to exhibit abnormal pericyte recruitment to the lymphatic capillaries and valve agenesis in the collecting vessels, indicating that FOXC2 is essential for the formation of a pericyte-free lymphatic network and lymphatic valve development (Petrova et al. 2004). Moreover, patients with LD experience venous valve failure in addition to lymphedema, suggesting a common mechanism for the morphogenesis of venous and lymphatic valves (Mellor et al. 2007). Gain-of-function mutations in FOXC2 have also been shown to occur in patients with lymphedema, although their association with distichiasis has not been confirmed (van Steensel et al. 2009). There is another form of hereditary lymphedema called primary congenital lymphedema, also known as Nonne-Milroy lymphedema, which is an early-onset congenital lymphedema linked to heterozygous missense mutations inactivating the kinase activity of VEGFR3 in about 70% of cases (Gordon et al. 2013b, Karkkainen et al. 2000). In addition, a homozygous recessive mutation in VEGFR3 has been reported in a lymphedema patient (Ghalamkarpour et al. 2009). A recent study identified a novel mutation in VEGFC as a cause for Milroy-like primary lymphedema (Gordon et al. 2013a). Mutations have been reported in more than 100 families to date (Brouillard, Boon & Vikkula 2014). The phenotype of Milroy patients is characterized by uni- or bilateral edema of the lower limbs with more infrequent manifestations including cellulitis, large calibre leg veins, papillomatosis and upslanting toenails (Brice et al. 2005). Lymphatic abnormalities are only present at sites of swelling, and the lymphatic drainage routes of the upper limb are normal despite the germline mutation (Connell, Brice & Mortimer 2008). The vast majority, 90%, of patients with VEGFR3 mutations were found to exhibit saphenous vein reflux, regardless of whether lymphedema was present or not, implying a dual role of the gene in venous and lymphatic development (Mellor et al. 2010). Contrary to the former belief that Nonne-Milroy lymphedema follows from aplasia, skin biopsies from the swollen feet of patients with VEGFR3 mutations have revealed the presence of abundant yet dysfunctional skin lymphatic vessels, attributing lymphedema rather to the functional failure of initial lymphatics than their absence (Mellor et al. 2010). However, knockout mice with similar Vegfr3 mutations display hypoplasia of the cutaneous lymphatics due to defective lymphangiogenesis, and this condition can be rescued by therapeutic delivery of VEGF-C (Karkkainen et al. 2001). Hypotrichosis-lymphedema-telangiectasia (HLT) is a very rare syndrome associated with mutations in the Sex determining region Y box 18 transcription factor (SOX18), and inherited 8 either autosomal dominantly or autosomal recessively (Irrthum et al. 2003). It is characterized by a combination of sparse hair, dilation of small blood vessels particularly in the palms, and lymphedema of the legs, which is likely due to lymphatic capillary hypoplasia (Schulte-Merker, Sabine & Petrova 2011). SOX18 has been demonstrated to promote lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) differentiation from venous precursors and to act in several developmental systems, including hair follicle development, vasculogenesis, and lymphangiogenesis (Francois et al. 2008). Meige disease, also termed lymphedema praecox, manifests as lymphedema in all four extremities and it is usually detected at less than 15 years of age, but a causative genetic mutation is yet to be confirmed. However, missense mutations in the GJC2 (Gap junction protein, gamma 2) gene encoding connexin 47 have been found to alter gap junction function, leading to impaired pulsatile lymphatic flow in patients with dominantly inherited lymphedema. (Ostergaard et al. 2011a, Ferrell et al. 2010.) Thus, GJC2 is considered as a candidate gene to explain the lymphedema of some patients previously labeled as having Meige disease (Connell et al. 2013). Hennekam syndrome, which is inherited autosomal recessively, comprises lymphedema, intestinal and renal lymphangiectasias, mental retardation and dysmorphic facial appearance (Alders et al. 2009). The genetic mutation responsible for lymphatic vessel dysplasia in this syndrome is located in CCBE1 (Collagen and calcium binding EGF domains 1), which normally potentiates the effects of VEGF-C on VEGFR-3 and has been shown to regulate LEC precursor budding and angiogenic sprouting in zebrafish (Jeltsch et al. 2014, Bos et al. 2011, Alders et al. 2009, Hogan et al. 2009). PTPN14 (Protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 14) is an intracellular phosphatase that interacts with VEGFR-3 upon activation by VEGF-C. Ptpn14-deficient mice display postnatal lymphedema due to hyperplastic lymphatic vessels. (Au et al. 2010.) A mutation in PTPN14 gene leads to lymphedema-choanal atresia syndrome in humans, which is characterized by blockage of nasal passage (choana) and lymphedema of the lower extremities in children (Schulte-Merker, Sabine & Petrova 2011). Emberger syndrome presents as co-occurring primary lymphedema and myelodysplasia progressing to acute myeloid leukaemia, with or without congenital deafness. The mutation responsible for lymphedema and predisposition to leukaemia in this syndrome is in GATA2 (GATA binding protein 2), which is a transcription factor controlling PROX1 (Prospero-related homeobox transcription factor 1) and FOXC2 expression. (Brouillard, Boon & Vikkula 2014, Ostergaard et al. 2011b.) Mutations in KIF11 (Kinesin family member 11) cause a specific syndrome named MCLMR, consisting of microcephaly with or without chorioretinopathy, lower limb lymphedema, or mental retardation. A definitive link between KIF11 and VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 pathway is yet to be established, but inhibition of EG5, which is a kinesin motor protein involved in mitotic spindle assembly and encoded by KIF11, activates a downstream signaling pathway of VEGFR-3. (Brouillard, Boon & Vikkula 2014, Ostergaard et al. 2012.) In addition, lymphedema occurs in several other syndromes including Turner syndrome, Noonan syndrome, and Aagenaes’ syndrome (cholestasis-lymphedema syndrome) (Ferrell, Finegold 2008, Loscalzo et al. 2005). 2.1.4.2 Secondary lymphedema The most prevalent etiology of acquired lymphedema is filariasis (elephantiasis) secondary to Wuchereria bancrofi (~95%), Brugia malay or Brugia timori infection, which is estimated to affect 120 million people worldwide with 1.2 billion people at risk of infection (Ottesen et al. 2008). The mosquito-borne parasitic nematodes reside in the lymphatic system; this triggers an inflammatory reaction and activates the production of VEGF-A, VEGF-C and VEGF-D, thus leading to hyperplasia and obstruction of the lymphatic vessels usually in the lower extremities and genitals (Pfarr et al. 2009). The Global Programme for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis is attempting to eliminate the disease as a public health problem by the year 2020, by conducting mass drug administrations with the aim of stopping transmission in endemic areas (Ottesen et al. 1997). Reductions in infection prevalence and even certified elimination of 9 lymphatic filariasis have been achieved in some isolated areas by the use of microfilaricidal drugs, i.e. drugs that kill the first larval stage, the microfilariae (Hoerauf 2008). However, these drugs provide no help to already infected individuals, as it is the death of the adult-stage worm that causes the pathological changes to occur (Pfarr et al. 2009). Instead, doxycycline has shown strong macrofilaricidal activity in affected patients by killing worm symbiotic bacteria (Wolbachia), consequently leading to a reduction in plasma concentrations of VEGF-C/sVEGFR-3 (soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3), which precedes the amelioration of lymphatic vessel dilation and lymphedema (Debrah et al. 2006). In the developed countries, the most common cause of secondary lymphedema is surgical or radiation therapy of a malignancy, especially breast cancer but also pelvic cancer and malignant melanoma (Oremus et al. 2012). Tumor cells often metastasize to lymph nodes, necessitating radical surgery with lymph node dissection and adjuvant radiotherapy, which damage the collecting lymphatic vessels and impair lymphatic flow (Norrmen et al. 2011). The remaining lymphatic vessels need to distend to accommodate the increased fluid load. Collecting lymphatic vessels may regenerate and spontaneously recanalize to some extent, but typically an adequate formation of new lymphatic vessels is not observed in lymphedema patients. (Tobbia et al. 2009, Ikomi et al. 2006, Abe 1976.) The pathophysiology of breast cancer-related lymphedema is not yet fully understood. The traditional view is the so-called stopcock hypothesis, according to which the surgically traumatized axilla impairs the lymphatic drainage from the entire arm, as if a stopcock had been partially closed. It does not, however, explain the delayed onset of swelling, the non-uniform distribution of swelling along the arm, sparing of some regions, e.g. the hand, and the lowering of plasma protein levels in the affected arm. (Stanton et al. 2009b.) The edema mainly accumulates in the highly compliant subcutis and skin, whereas there is very little swelling observed in the muscle compartment (Collins et al. 1995). The literature does not provide reliable prevalence rates, although there is an estimate that there are 10 million patients suffering from secondary lymphedema in the US alone (Szuba et al. 2003). The incidence of upper-limb lymphedema following mastectomy ranges between 24% and 49%, with lower rates of 4 - 28% reported for lumpectomy, although there has been a reduction in the reported incidence since the development of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy to assess metastatic spread of cancer (DiSipio et al. 2013, Warren et al. 2007). Approximately 75% of breast cancer-related lymphedema cases develop within 2 years of surgery and 90% within 3 years, but it can remain latent for as long as 20 years (Stanton et al. 2009b). Risk factors for developing post-mastectomy lymphedema include the extent of axillary surgery, adjunctive radiotherapy, postoperative seroma, obesity, infection or trauma to the ipsilateral limb, and most novelly, a high peripheral blood vascular filtration rate, i.e. higher demand for lymphatic drainage (Stanton et al. 2009a, Warren et al. 2007, Herd-Smith et al. 2001). Recently, a genetic predisposition has been implicated in the development of lymphedema following breast cancer treatment (Newman et al. 2012, Finegold et al. 2012). Acquired lymphedema can also be secondary to peripheral arterial disease, varicose vein surgery, saphenous vein harvesting for bypass surgery, circumcision, intrathecal pump insertion for analgesia, recurrent bacterial lymphangitis, burns, and the spread of malignant tumors obstructing the lymphatics or regional lymph nodes (Rockson, Rivera 2008). There is currently a paucity of effective treatment strategies for lymphedema. The availabe therapy is based on conservative methods, e.g. compression garments, manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) and complex decongestive therapy (MLD, limb compression, skin care and exercise combined), or mechanical treatments such as intermittent pneumatic compression devices and low-level laser therapy, or occasionally surgery. In addition, pharmacological therapy in the form of benzopyrones has been attempted, as benzopyrones are thought to increase proteolysis in the edematous tissue. (Warren et al. 2007.) Problems associated with conservative treatments are minor, and they are likely to have little impact on the clinical outcome (Oremus et al. 2012). Surgical approaches, including resection procedures, microsurgical interventions and liposuction, are considered when lymphedema is refractory to 10 non-operative treatment. Resection surgery involves the excision of subcutaneous tissue, and it is applied in extreme cases, when massive limb changes or fibrotic induration are observed. (Murdaca et al. 2012.) These ‘debulking’ operations may, however, result in extensive scar formation and substantial morbidities of the skin, including ulceration, keloids and papillomatosis (Warren et al. 2007). Circumferential liposuction combined with lifelong compression, on the other hand, is a minimally invasive, novel technique to remove the hypertrophied adipose tissue and it is claimed to achieve a consequential improvement in skin microcirculation, reduced cellulitis, and a significant reduction of edema with no recurrence during 7 years’ follow-up (Damstra et al. 2009, Brorson 2003). Microsurgical techniques, creating lymphaticovenous or lymphaticolymphatic anastomoses in order to directly correct the underlying pathology, appear to promote the long-term alleviation of edema (Felmerer et al. 2012, Campisi, Boccardo 2004, Baumeister, Siuda 1990). Although no consensus prevails with regard to what is the optimal surgical method, a minimally invasive lymphovenous shunt operation utilizing microsurgical techniques is the most popular at present (Suami, Chang 2010). Overall, surgical treatment modalities have met with limited success due to the difficulties in identifying, preserving and anastomosing lymphatic vessels to pre-existing networks (Saaristo et al. 2012). Microvascular lymph node transfer, a technique in which composite soft tissue including lymph nodes is transplanted to the axilla or wrist of the lymphedematous limb, has been reported to decrease perimeter and improve lymph drainage in the affected arm (Lin et al. 2009, Becker et al. 2006). Lymph node transfer has also been combined with standard breast reconstruction surgery in the simultaneous reconstruction of the missing breast and lymphatic network in the operated axilla (Saaristo et al. 2012). However, in microvascular lymph node transfer, new lymphatic vessels are believed to sprout spontaneously from the transferred lymph nodes and form anastomoses with the recipient site (Suami, Chang 2010). It is essential that there is a viable connection with lymphatic vessels for the viability and function of the lymph nodes, and experimental studies have shown that incorporation of the lymph nodes into the existing lymphatic vasculature may fail, resulting in a deterioration of the transferred lymph node (Hadamitzky, Blum & Pabst 2009, Tammela et al. 2007, Mebius et al. 1991). Therefore, the combination of surgical lymph node transfer with simultaneous administration of prolymphangiogenic growth factors may promote the reconstruction of the lymphatic vasculature and alleviate postoperative lymphedema. This approach will be further reviewed in chapter 2.6.1 “Preclinical studies of lymphedema”. 2.1.5 Tumor lymphangiogenesis and metastasis The lymphatic vasculature serves as a conduit for tumor cells, as they spread via lymphatic vessels to colonize lymph nodes. In some respects, tumor cells resemble leukocytes by exploiting many of the same trafficking pathways, chemokines, and adhesion molecules to gain access to lymphatic vessels. (Holopainen et al. 2011, Muller et al. 2001.) Several cancers, breast cancer and melanoma in particular, are known to metastasize to lymph nodes; this often determines their prognosis and predicts patient survival. The metastatic status of lymph nodes has an important role in tumor staging and clinical decision-making. (Sleeman, Thiele 2009, Scoggings et al. 2005.) Many tumors and tumor-associated macrophages express two lymphangiogenic growth factors, VEGF-C and VEGF-D, and this property has been shown to correlate with tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis, lymphatic invasion, distant metastasis, and poor clinical outcomes (Holopainen et al. 2011). Interestingly, lymphangiogenesis has also been reported to occur in sentinel lymph nodes even prior to the arrival of metastatic tumor cells, as well as in metastatically non-involved, remote lymph nodes, indicating that primary tumors prepare their future metastatic site in advance by producing sufficient concentrations of lymphangiogenic growth factors to induce lymphatic vessel growth in the target tissue (Hirakawa et al. 2007, Van den Eynden et al. 2006). Antilymphangiogenic strategies using 11 neutralizing antibodies against VEGFR-3, the neuropilin 2 (NRP2) co-receptor, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D, as well as soluble VEGFR-3 fusion proteins, have been employed in the battle against tumor lymphangiogenesis and metastasis, and a VEGFR-3-targeting monoclonal antibody has entered phase 1 clinical trials (Alitalo 2011). Blocking of VEGFR-3 exerts no effect on preexisting vessels, but leads to inhibition of lymphatic vessel growth in tumors and thus has achieved a reduction of lymph node metastases in preclinical animal models (Karpanen et al. 2006b, Lin et al. 2005, He et al. 2005). The involvement of lymphangiogenic growth factors in tumor progression and metastasis is an important consideration regarding the safety of prolymphangiogenic gene therapy, and will be further discussed in chapter 2.5.3 “Safety issues in gene therapy”. 2.1.6 Other lymphatic vasculature-associated diseases Lymphatic hyperplasia or enhanced lymphangiogenesis have been associated with chronic inflammation in psoriasis, colitis ulcerosa, rheumatoid arthritis, Mycoplasma pulmonis infection and kidney transplant rejection (Cueni, Detmar 2008). Recent research has shed light into the molecular mechanisms behind inflammation-induced lymphangiogenesis, suggesting that induction of the NF-κB (Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) pathway by inflammatory stimuli promotes VEGFR-3 expression in LECs, thus leading to increased sensitivity of the pre-existing lymphatics to VEGF-C and VEGF-D and enhanced lymphangiogenesis (Flister et al. 2010). At sites of tissue inflammation, macrophages contribute to lymphatic vessel growth by producing VEGF-C and VEGF-D, and furthermore, they have been reported to transdifferentiate into LECs in inflamed mouse cornea (Maruyama et al. 2005, Cursiefen et al. 2004). In addition, VEGF-A appears to have a role in inflammation-induced lymphangiogenesis, as it was found to induce leaky, functionally impaired lymphatic vessels in the murine epidermis after ultraviolet B-irradiation, and this could be prevented by administration of a VEGF-A neutralizing antibody (Kajiya, Hirakawa & Detmar 2006). VEGF-Amediated inflammatory lymphangiogenesis may be the result of VEGF-A’s chemotactic recruitment of macrophages, which in turn supply VEGF-C and -D (Cursiefen et al. 2004). Enhanced lymphangiogenesis in inflammatory conditions facilitates the resolution of edema and inflammatory infiltrate, making stimulation of lymphangiogenesis an attractive treatment option for certain inflammatory conditions (Cueni, Detmar 2008). In contrast, blockade of VEGFR-3 signaling has been reported to suppress dendritic cell migration and concomitant corneal transplant rejection in mice, as well as adaptive immune responses towards heart transplants in a rat model, which may be evidence in favor of inhibition of lymphangiogenesis in the context of heterologous tissue transplantation (Alitalo 2011, Nykanen et al. 2010, Chen et al. 2004). Lymphatic dysfunction has been proposed to be connected to disturbances in lipid homeostasis, as patients with chronic lymphedema gradually accumulate subcutaneous fat in edematous sites (Dixon 2010a). Similar observations have been made in mice with secondary lymphedema, where impaired lymphatic drainage led to abnormal lipid accumulation that persisted even after the lymphatic drainage was restored (Rutkowski et al. 2006). In Prox1+/mice, abnormal leakage of lymph from mesenteric lymphatic vessels appears to promote lipid accumulation, and these mice also possess higher levels of leptin and fatty livers, which are features of late-onset obesity in humans (Harvey et al. 2005). The role of lymphatic vessels in atherosclerosis remains as yet undefined, although increased lymphangiogenesis has been observed in progressive atherosclerotic lesions and stenotic aortic valves (Syvaranta et al. 2012, Kholova et al. 2011). Lymphatic vessels are rare in the intima and abundant in the adventitia of atherosclerotic coronary arteries, but the functional consequences of lymphangiogenesis in the adventitia are unknown (Nakano et al. 2005). ApoE-/- (Apolipoprotein E) mice display not only tertiary lymphoid organs in the adventitia of aortas but also degeneration and loss of function of lymphatic vessels in response to hypercholesterolemia (Lim et al. 2009, Grabner et al. 2009). 12 Altogether, it has been proposed that a compromised lymphatic system may contribute to the increased plasma cholesterol levels and the accumulation of cholesterol and inflammatory cells in atherosclerotic lesions (Vuorio et al. 2014, Syvaranta et al. 2012, Lim et al. 2009). However, VEGF-C and VEGF-D were shown to exert neither anti- nor pro-atherogenic effects in a mouse model of atherosclerosis (Leppanen et al. 2005). Lymphatic vessels were recently found to play a significant role in reverse cholesterol transport (RCT), which is involved in the removal of excess cholesterol from peripheral tissues (Lim et al. 2013, Martel et al. 2013). Mice transplanted with atherosclerotic aortas displayed impaired RCT when lymphatic drainage was blocked (Martel et al. 2013). Conversely, VEGF-C treatment to restore lymphatic function improved RCT (Lim et al. 2013). LECs give rise to various lymphovascular tumors, such as lymphangiosarcoma, which is a rare malignant tumor reported in the context of chronic lymphedema due to mastectomy, inguinal lymphadenectomy, trauma, or infection (Krishnamoorthy et al. 2012). Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), on the other hand, is a benign neoplasm affecting young females that is characterized by the proliferation of SMC-like cells and lymphatic vessels, as well as pulmonary cysts that impair lung function over time, finally resulting in respiratory failure. LAM cells secrete high levels of VEGF-D and spread through the lymphatic vessels to distant sites, where they may disrupt lymphatic function. (Seyama et al. 2010.) Kaposi sarcoma, caused by the Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV), is an angiogenic tumor predominantly seen in people with acquired immunodeficiencies. Kaposi sarcoma cells express both blood endothelial and LEC markers, and VEGFR-3 antibody treatment has been claimed to be effective in reducing lymphangiogenic sprouting of KSHV-infected LECs in three-dimensional culture. (Alitalo 2011, Tvorogov et al. 2010.) Interstitial lymphangiogenesis due to increased production of VEGF-C by macrophages has been linked to extrarenal maintenance of normal blood pressure in conditions of interstitial salt accumulation in the skin. Blockade of VEGF-C signaling has led to salt-induced hypertension in rats, suggesting that the immune system regulates volume and blood pressure homeostasis via lymphangiogenic growth factor activation. (Machnik et al. 2009.) Furthermore, lymphatic vessel dysfunction has been implicated in the failure of neonatal lung inflation (Jakus et al. 2014). 2.2 THE BLOOD VASCULAR SYSTEM AND BLOOD VESSEL GROWTH 2.2.1 Structure and function of the blood vascular system The blood vascular system exists to deliver oxygen, nutrients and hormones to the tissues, as well as to remove carbon dioxide and metabolic waste products from the tissues (Guyton, Hall 2006). The vascular system is the first organ system to develop in the embryo, and a failure to establish a functional circulation leads to death during early organogenesis (Copp 1995). The cardiovascular system comprises the heart, which is responsible for circulating blood; the arteries and veins which transport blood to and from the peripheral tissues; and the capillaries, which allow the diffusion of substances between the blood and the surrounding tissues. The rate of blood flow is regulated intrinsically by tissues and organs to meet their metabolic and functional needs, as well as extrinsically via neural or hormonal influences. Ultimately, it is the balance between these regulatory mechanisms that determines the vascular tone and blood flow in the tissue. (Guyton, Hall 2006.) The heart pumps blood first through large elastic arteries such as the aorta, subclavian, and iliac arteries, which then branch into medium-sized muscular arteries and subsequently into small arteries and arterioles, which are the main regulators of physiologic resistance to blood flow (Kumar, Abbas & Fausto 2005). Capillaries originate from the point of metarteriolecapillary junctions, where precapillary sphincters act as shunts by opening and closing the entrance to the capillaries based on local O2 (oxygen) concentrations (Guyton, Hall 2006). The capillaries with their thin walls as well as the pores in their walls when combined with the tiny 13 diameter of a single erythrocyte and slow flow, create the ideal conditions for the exchange of fluid, nutrients, electrolytes and hormones between the blood and the interstitial fluid (Kumar, Abbas & Fausto 2005). Filtration of fluid in and out of the capillaries is powered by hydrostatic pressure forcing fluid out of the arterial side of the capillary bed, and colloid osmotic pressure causing reabsorption of extravasated fluid into the venous side of the capillary bed (Guyton, Hall 2006). The capillaries are located within 200 μm of any cell, except in avascular tissues such as cartilage and cornea of the eye, and they are highest in density in metabolically active tissues, such as the myocardium (Kumar, Abbas & Fausto 2005, Carmeliet, Jain 2000). The O2-deprived blood flows from the capillaries into postcapillary venules, which are the main site of vascular leakage and leukocyte infiltration in inflammatory reactions. The larger veins, which are formed progressively from mergers of venules, transport the blood back to the heart at a slower rate and under lower pressure conditions than those prevailing in the arterial system. Venous valves and surrounding skeletal muscle contractions augment blood flow particularly in the extremities to overcome gravity and prevent reverse flow. The veins are able to retain large quantities of blood: approximately 66% of all blood is in the veins at any given time. (Guyton, Hall 2006, Kumar, Abbas & Fausto 2005.) 2.2.2 Blood vessel components The main constituents of blood vessel walls are endothelial cells (ECs), SMCs, and extracellular matrix, including elastin, collagen and glycosaminoglycans. Three layers - intima, media, and adventitia - separated by the internal and external laminas, can be defined in arteries and veins, although the proportions of these layers vary dramatically between these two vessel types. In comparison to veins, arteries have thicker SMC layers of media, and round, open lumens even when not filled with blood. In contrast, veins display larger diameters and lumens, as well as thinner media but thicker adventitia to protect them from external trauma. (Kumar, Abbas & Fausto 2005.) The Notch signaling pathway controls the commitment of angioblasts to arterial or venous lineages in the embryo before the appearance of the circulation, but arterial-venous differentiation is also driven by hemodynamic forces (le Noble et al. 2004, Lawson, Vogel & Weinstein 2002). Vascular cells display a high degree of plasticity with respect to environmental factors, and the predetermined identity can be remolded even in the adult (Fann et al. 1990). Capillary walls consist of merely a monolayer of ECs adjoined by different types of intercellular junctions, such as tight junctions or the more dynamic adherens junctions, which control endothelial permeability (Dejana, Corada & Lampugnani 1995). ECs play a central role in vascular biology and pathology, particularly in vasotonus modulation, blood-tissue interactions, fibrinolysis and coagulation, blood cell activation and migration, and the vascularization of normal and neoplastic tissues. The microvascular endothelium exhibits different phenotypes based on anatomic location and adaptation to environment. For example, the endothelium in the central nervous system, which is a part of the blood-brain barrier, is continuous with complex tight junctions and allows only selective movement of molecules across, whereas the fenestrated endothelium promotes a high rate of absorption in the gastrointestinal tract and secretion in the endocrine glands. (Risau 1995.) Lymph nodes contain special postcapillary venules called high endothelial venules in reference to their plump phenotype, which permit lymphocyte entry from the blood circulation to the lymph node (Girard, Springer 1995). Endothelial activation happens in response to various pathophysiological stimuli, e.g. there are inducers such as cytokines, bacterial products or hemodynamic stresses which activate ECs to express adhesion molecules, and to produce other cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and vasoactive molecules (Kumar, Abbas & Fausto 2005). Endothelial dysfunction is characterized by impaired vasoreactivity and an abnormally thrombogenic and proinflammatory endothelial surface; these pathological changes are associated with atherosclerosis, thrombus formation, and cardiovascular diseases in general (Endemann, Schiffrin 2004). The EC layer of capillaries, excluding the discontinuous 14 endothelium type found in the liver, spleen and bone marrow, is lined abluminally by a basement membrane (BM) and encircled by microvascular pericytes embedded in the membrane (Hirschi, D'Amore 1996, Risau 1995). Pericytes are multipotent mesenchymal cells that make specific focal contacts with ECs and play a role in vascular growth, stabilization and remodeling, as well as in the regulation of capillary blood flow (Armulik, Abramsson & Betsholtz 2005). 2.2.3 Vasculogenesis The development of the vascular system occurs via two processes, vasculogenesis and angiogenesis (Figure 3A). Vasculogenesis is the first step in the formation of the embryonic cardiovascular system, involving the de novo differentiation of blood vessels from vascular stem cells. EC lineages as well as hematopoietic cells arise from mesoderm-derived stem cells. These precursors, called hemangioblasts, form blood islands, in which the centrally located cells differentiate into hematopoietic stem cells, whereas the peripheral cells develop into angioblasts that further differentiate into vessel wall components, i.e. ECs and mural cells. (Risau, Flamme 1995.) The blood islands fuse to form a primary capillary plexus, which then undergoes complex remodeling to generate the mature vasculature (Coultas, Chawengsaksophak & Rossant 2005). Organs developing from the mesoderm and endoderm, e.g. liver, spleen and myocardium, are vascularized by vasculogenesis, whereas organs that are not initially colonized by angioblasts, e.g. the brain and the spinal cord, develop their vasculature via angiogenesis (Kassmeyer et al. 2009). The genetic control of normal vascular development includes activation of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) to induce production of vascular progenitors, as well as VEGF signaling that plays a decisive role in the further development of the vascular system (Coultas, Chawengsaksophak & Rossant 2005, Risau, Flamme 1995). The default state of the adult vasculature is quiescence, i.e. physiological formation of new blood vessels is rare, except in cases of EC proliferation during the estrus cycle or in exerciseinduced muscular hyperplasia (Gielen, Schuler & Adams 2010, Reynolds, Killilea & Redmer 1992). Neovascularization of this kind occurs primarily via angiogenesis, which was long believed to be the only mechanism by which new vessels could be formed in adults. However, the term postnatal vasculogenesis has emerged; this refers to de novo recruitment of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (BM-EPCs) and circulating EPCs for blood vessel formation in adults. (Eguchi, Masuda & Asahara 2007, Kopp, Ramos & Rafii 2006.) EPCs are believed to migrate, proliferate and differentiate into ECs at their destined location (Kassmeyer et al. 2009). In the late 1990s, EPCs were isolated from peripheral blood and shown to be recruited at sites of ischemia, thus implying that they would be capable of promoting vasculogenesis (Asahara et al. 1997). Since their discovery, it has been observed that the EPC population actually consists of several different species of endothelial progenitors with varying phenotypic profiles and biological functions (Zampetaki, Kirton & Xu 2008, Lin et al. 2000). Subsequently, EPCs have been shown to contribute to blood vessel development in wound healing and in tumor growth, as well as to re-endothelialization of injured vessels and vascular prostheses (Kassmeyer et al. 2009, Ranjan et al. 2009, Xiao et al. 2006). Low levels of EPCs appear to predict the likelihood of major cardiovascular events and to promote the progression of atherosclerosis (Fadini et al. 2010, Werner et al. 2005, Hill et al. 2003). Over the years, contradictory findings regarding the physiological relevance of EPCs in postnatal neovascularization have emerged, and it has been proposed that EPCs do not actually proliferate and differentiate into ECs, but derive from mononuclear cells and induce neovessel growth indirectly by secreting growth factors (Larrivee, Karsan 2007, Kinnaird et al. 2004, Rehman et al. 2003). 15 2.2.4 Angiogenesis Angiogenesis is the mechanism by which embryonic organs that are not initially colonized by angioblasts, e.g. the brain and the spinal cord, develop a vasculature, as well as the principal mechanism of blood vessel growth in adults (Risau 1997, Baldwin 1996). Furthermore, pathological angiogenesis is a prerequisite for tumor growth beyond 1-2 mm in diameter and the concept of treating tumors by inhibiting angiogenesis was first postulated in the 1970s (Folkman 1971). Tumor vessels are irregular and immature with increased leakiness and susceptibility to thrombosis and rupture (Carmeliet, Jain 2011). Conversely, insufficient vessel growth and regression contribute to disorders like myocardial infarction, stroke, and neurodegeneration (Potente, Gerhardt & Carmeliet 2011). Angiogenesis can occur by sprouting from pre-existing capillaries, which comprises proliferation, migration, threedimensional organization and tube formation of ECs, or by intussusception, in which transluminal pillars are formed within capillaries and divide the vessel lumen into two parallel vessels, or by bridging, where the vessels split to form daughter vessels via the formation of EC bridges (Figure 3A) (Kassmeyer et al. 2009, Burri, Djonov 2002, Conway, Collen & Carmeliet 2001). ‘The angiogenic switch’ is a widely accepted term used to describe the balance between the inducers of angiogenesis and the countervailing inhibitors: the ‘switch’ is ‘off’ when the proangiogenic molecule concentration is balanced by that of the antiangiogenic molecules, and ‘on’ when the balance shifts towards a proangiogenic state (Bergers, Benjamin 2003). Hypoxia, low pH, hypoglycemia, mechanical stress, inflammatory conditions, and malignancies are all triggering events of the switch (Carmeliet, Jain 2000). Tissue hypoxia is the main physiological stimulus for angiogenesis, leading to increased expression of proangiogenic growth factors, most importantly VEGF-A, via activation of the hypoxia-inducible factor, HIF (Hickey, Simon 2006). After the release of growth factors, a cascade of events takes place in order for vascular sprouting to occur: the pre-existing vessels become dilated and hyperpermeable in response to nitric oxide (NO) and VEGF-A respectively, the extracellular matrix is remodeled and the BM degraded, plasma proteins leak from the angiogenic vessels and serve as a provisional matrix, activated ECs proliferate and migrate towards the growth factor gradient, a capillary tube is formed, and finally, the sprouts anastomose to form a functional loop, thereby establishing a perfusing vessel (Jain 2003). The immature vessel network is then remodeled and pruned by tissue-derived signaling molecules and blood flow conditions, e.g. pressure and wall-shear stress, to adequately oxygenate the perfused organ (Wacker, Gerhardt 2011, Resnick et al. 2003). In order to achieve vessel stabilization and maturation, pericyte coverage is acquired and the BM is formed (Jain 2003). ECs with three distinct phenotypes have been described for the different roles in vessel branching: non-proliferative, filopodia-rich ’tip cells’ respond to environmental cues and lead the way for the growing vessel, ‘stalk cells’ follow behind elongating the sprout, and ‘phalanx cells’ are responsible for vessel maturation and stabilization (Figure 3B) (De Smet et al. 2009). Tip cells share similar features with the axon growth cone guiding neuronal growth, and they both respond to signals from some of the same molecular families, such as Slits, Netrins, Semaphorins, and Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands (Adams, Eichmann 2010). In contrast to sprouting, intussusception does not require cell proliferation and BM degradation, and is usually driven by higher levels of shear stress rather than angiogenic factors (Styp-Rekowska et al. 2011). Although VEGF-A is the most important driver of vascular formation, other growth factors are involved in the process as well. Angiopoietin 1 (ANG1) and ephrin-B2 are required for further remodelling and maturation of the immature vasculature. Ephrin-B2 has a crucial role in distinguishing arterial and venous identity of developing vessels. (Yancopoulos et al. 2000.) Platelet-derived growth factor B (PDGF-B) mediates pericyte differentiation and migration in the maturation process of vessels (Lindahl et al. 1997). FGFs are able to initiate angiogenesis, where they act not only on ECs but also on other cell types (Hanahan, Folkman 1996). 16 Extracellular edema due to increased vascular permeability is strictly associated with angiogenesis, and it can be encountered during proangiogenic gene therapy as a potentially serious side effect (Rissanen et al. 2003b, Dvorak et al. 1995). The development of edema in skeletal muscle, for example, may worsen ischemia by physically compressing blood vessels. An attempt to limit tissue edema by inducing lymphatic vessel growth simultaneously with angiogenesis resulted in reduced edema in rabbit skeletal muscles (Lähteenvuo 2009). Thus, a combination of proangiogenic and prolymphangiogenic gene therapy may confer added benefit in comparison to angiogenic monotherapy alone. 2.2.5 Arteriogenesis Arteriogenesis denotes the postnatal remodeling of small arterioles into larger caliber conducting arteries (Schaper, Scholz 2003). This process is known to occur in ischemic conditions, when gradually developing stenoses stimulate the outgrowth of pre-existing collateral arteries to circumvent the arterial occlusion (Figure 3C) (Troidl, Schaper 2012). Arteriogenesis takes place in the vicinity of the occluded artery, as opposed to the angiogenic response to ischemia, which occurs relatively far and downstream from the occlusion (Schaper, Scholz 2003, Ito et al. 1997). The key forces driving arteriogenesis are fluid shear stress acting on the endothelium, and circumferential wall stress caused by the tramsmural pressure gradient across the vessel wall (Schaper, Scholz 2003, Price et al. 2002). When an arterial occlusion develops, a pressure gradient is created between the high-pressure area upstream of the occlusion and the low-pressure downstream area. In order for arteriogenesis to successfully restore circulation to the affected area, an interconnecting arteriolar network between the preocclusive and the postocclusive microcirculation must exist. (Heil, Schaper 2004.) The formation of a pressure gradient is followed by a redistribution of perfusion, an increase in flow, and consequently, an increase in fluid shear stress, which activates the endothelium (Persson, Buschmann 2011). The ECs swell and genes coding for chemoattractant cytokines, growth factors, and adhesion molecules are upregulated (Lee et al. 2004, Deindl et al. 2003, Schaper et al. 1976). This attracts monocytes to adhere to the endothelium, which then mature into macrophages and these cells begin to remodel the vascular wall by secreting proteases (Bergmann et al. 2006). Mitosis of ECs and SMCs follows, the neo-intima develops, and a collateral artery with a typical corkscrew-like morphology is formed (Scholz et al. 2000). Collateral growth is terminated early when the maximal conductance has reached 35 - 40% of normal, because the fluid shear stress decreases due to collateral diameter enlargement (Hoefer et al. 2001). A few large vessels mature and smaller vessels are pruned in the course of establishing an effective collateral circulation, as small vessels have high resistance and vascular adaptation always aims at the most economical solution (Troidl, Schaper 2012). Significant variation in the ability to grow collateral vessels has been observed between individuals (Rehman 2008). A minority (20 - 25%) of patients with functional collaterals seem to be able to prevent myocardial ischemia completely during coronary occlusion, which indicates that some people may possess a genetic predisposition that favors adaptive collateral growth (Wustmann et al. 2003). 17 Figure 3. Schematic representation of the mechanisms of vessel formation. A, Endothelial-cell precursors (angioblasts and hemangioblasts) differentiate into ECs which coalesce to form primitive vasculogenic networks (vasculogenesis). These networks are remodeled through angiogenic processes involving sprouting, intussusception and bridging. Adapted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nat Rev Cancer, Hendrix et al., “Vasculogenic mimicry and tumour-cell plasticity: lessons from melanoma” © 2003. B, Tip cells lead the way for a growing vessel with stalk cells following behind, while phalanx cells are involved in vessel maturation. Adapted with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol., De Smet et al., “Mechanisms of Vessel Branching: Filopodia on Endothelial Tip Cells Lead the Way, 2009. C, Arteriogenesis occurs in response to gradually developing occlusion of an artery to resolve ischemia of the target tissue. Adapted from Integr Biol (Camb)., Korpisalo & Ylä-Herttuala, “Stimulation of functional vessel growth by gene therapy” (2010), with permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry (http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b921869f). 2.3 THE LYMPHATIC SYSTEM AND LYMPHATIC VESSEL GROWTH 2.3.1 Anatomy and function of the lymphatic system The lymphatic system consists of lymph that is a protein-rich fluid derived from plasma, lymphatic vessels that transport lymph, lymphoid cells, and organized lymphoid tissues, i.e. lymph nodes, spleen, thymus, tonsils, Peyer’s patches in the intestine, as well as lymphoid 18 tissue in the liver and lungs (Szuba et al. 2003). Lymphatics are dispersed throughout the body, particularly at sites that come into direct contact with the external environment, but are absent from avascular tissues such as epithelia and cartilage, as well as from the central nervous system and bone marrow (Tammela, Alitalo 2010, Drake, Vogl & Mitchell 2005). The lymphatic system parallels and supplements the cardiovascular system, but differs from it in several aspects. In contrast to the blood vasculature, the lymphatic system is not a circulatory system but a one-way transport system. (Norrmen et al. 2011.) Blind-ended lymphatic capillaries absorb excess fluid containing pathogens, certain leukocytes, hormones, and cell debris, from the interstitial space (Alitalo 2011, Drake, Vogl & Mitchell 2005). Lymph is conveyed to progressively larger lymphatic vessels, first to precollectors which then coalesce into collecting lymphatic vessels, ultimately to be returned back to the systemic circulation at the lymphaticovenous junctions between the thoracic or right lymphatic duct and the subclavian veins (Norrmen et al. 2011). The thoracic duct drains the left side of the body, abdomen, lower limbs, left arm and shoulder, and the left side of the head and neck, whereas lymph from the upper right quadrant of the body wall, right upper limb, and the right side of the head and neck is collected into the right lymphatic duct (Drake, Vogl & Mitchell 2005, Jeltsch et al. 2003). The overall lymph flow in humans has been estimated to range between 2 and 8 liters per day (Levick, Michel 2010, Guyton, Hall 2006). Lymph nodes are located along the course of the larger lymphatic vessels; the lymph passes through these nodes before entering the venous system. In the lymph nodes, the lymph is screened for pathogens and activated immune cells and antibodies are released into the general circulation. (Young et al. 2006.) Thus the lymphatic system also plays an integral role in immune responses of the body by serving as a trafficking route for immune cells. Specialized lymphatic vessels called lacteals inside the intestinal villi absorb dietary fats and fat-soluble vitamins and transport them to the venous circulation (Dixon 2010b). The lymphatic system of the extremities is divided into a superficial (epifascial) compartment that drains lymph from the skin and subcutis, and a deeper (subfascial) compartment that drains muscle, bone and the deeper blood vessels. These two systems fuse in the pelvic area, whereas those of the upper limb merge in the axilla. (Szuba et al. 2003.) In cases of obstruction, the epifascial and subfascial compartments can function in an interdependent manner such that the healthy compartment is able to compensate for the obstructed counterpart by accelerating transport (Brautigam et al. 1998). In normal conditions, subfascial drainage is slower than the epifascial form (Mostbeck, Partsch 1999, Brautigam et al. 1998). Microstructurally lymphatic capillaries are composed of a monolayer of oak-leaf-shaped LECs that are connected by discontinuous button-like junctions, have little to no BM, and lack pericytes and SMCs (Schulte-Merker, Sabine & Petrova 2011). Fluid and leukocyte entry is enabled by a discontinuous BM containing portals that facilitate cell migration into the vessel, and by the presence of specialized flap-like openings between LECs that function as primary valves (Pflicke, Sixt 2009, Baluk et al. 2007, Trzewik et al. 2001). LECs are attached to extracellular matrix by elastic anchoring filaments, which prevent collapse of the capillary should there be an increase in interstitial pressure (Leak, Burke 1968). In contrast to the lymphatic capillaries, the LECs of the collecting lymphatic vessels are connected by continuous zipper-like junctions and ensheathed by a SMC layer as well as a BM (Tammela et al. 2007). Lymphangions, i.e. the functional units of the collecting lymphatic vessels, are separated by intraluminal valves, which are particularly numerous per vessel segment in organs with high hydrostatic pressure, such as legs (Schulte-Merker, Sabine & Petrova 2011). The collecting lymphatic vessels are analogous to the veins in the respect that lymph is propelled forward by the intrinsic contractility of SMCs, contractions of adjacent skeletal muscles, and arterial pulsations, and backflow is prevented by valves (Muthuchamy, Zawieja 2008). 19 2.3.2 Lymphangiogenesis The lymphatic system in the human embryo begins to develop about a month later than the first blood vessels, at around embryonic week 6 or 7 (Wilting, Neeff & Christ 1999). It is assumed that lymphatic vessels sprout from veins when a subpopulation of ECs in the cardinal vein starts to express PROX1, signifying their commitment to the LEC lineage (Figure 4) (Wigle, Oliver 1999, Kaipainen et al. 1995). Prox1 is a lymphatic hallmark gene and its expression is induced by Sox18 and COUP-TFII (the orphan nuclear receptor chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor 2), as evidenced by experiments performed in mice (Srinivasan et al. 2010, Francois et al. 2008). COUP-TFII further interacts with PROX1 by forming a protein complex, which is known to control the expression of several LEC genes, including VEGFR3 (Lin et al. 2010, Lee et al. 2009). Notch signaling has been proposed to function as a negative regulator of LEC specification, as loss of Notch1 results in a surplus of LEC progenitors in mouse embryos (Murtomaki et al. 2013). As a consequence of PROX1 expression, LEC progenitors bud off from the cardinal vein while starting to express podoplanin and then migrate along a gradient formed by VEGF-C, concomitantly creating the first lymphatic structures, the lymph sacs, which further give rise to a primary lymphatic capillary plexus (Yang, Oliver 2014). In addition to VEGF-C, CCBE1 is required for the budding of LEC progenitors from the cardinal vein (Bos et al. 2011). In fact, Ccbe1 has been shown to regulate Vegfc-mediated induction of Vegfr3 signaling during developmental lymphangiogenesis in zebrafish (Le Guen et al. 2014). Several factors influencing lymph sac formation have also been identified lately, including components of adrenomedullin signaling, TIE1 (Tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin-like and EGF-like domains 1) which is an angiopoietin receptor, and GATA2 (Yang, Oliver 2014). Vessels spread by sprouting throughout the embryo from the primary lymphatic capillary plexus (Norrmen et al. 2011). Lymphatic sprouting requires an interaction between NRP2 and VEGFR-3 in response to VEGF-C, and this process can be inhibited in vivo by preventing VEGF-C from binding to NRP2 (Xu et al. 2010). The formation of a hierarchical network of capillaries and collecting vessels is finalized by remodeling and maturation (Adams, Alitalo 2007). A small population of LEC progenitors remains inside the cardinal vein and forms the lymphovenous valve, which is needed to return lymph fluid back to systemic blood circulation (Srinivasan, Oliver 2011). Much of the current knowledge of the embryonic development of the lymphatic system has emerged from studies performed in knockout mouse models, which have revealed a number of the genes responsible for lymphatic development. Mice with inactivated Sox18 or COUP-TFII suffer a total blockade of LEC differentiation (Lin et al. 2010, Francois et al. 2008). Prox1- and Vegfc-deficient mice do not develop any lymphatic structures either due to failed budding and sprouting of LECs (Karkkainen et al. 2004, Wigle, Oliver 1999). The number of LECs is reduced in Prox1+/- embryos because of decreased progenitors in the cardinal vein (Srinivasan, Oliver 2011). Interestingly, conditional deletion of Prox1 at any developmental or postnatal stage leads to the reversal of LEC identity to a blood endothelial cell-like fate, demonstrating that LECs require the continual expression of PROX1 in order to maintain their phenotypic identity (Johnson et al. 2008). Vegfc+/- mice are viable but suffer from a lymphatic deficiency and lymphedema (Karkkainen et al. 2004). Ccbe1-/- mice lack lymphatic vessels, develop edema, and die prenatally (Bos et al. 2011). Additionally, VEGFR-3 kinase activity is indispensable for lymphatic sprouting (Zhang et al. 2010). Vegfr3-/- mouse embryos die due to cardiovascular defects before the emergence of lymphatic vessels, which has prevented direct assessment of the requirement for VEGFR-3 in the migration of LEC progenitors from the early veins (Dumont et al. 1998). Intriguingly, Vegfc-/-; Vegfd-/- double-knockout embryos do not phenocopy the Vegfr3-/embryos, perhaps evidence for some ligand-independent VEGFR-3 signaling in the early embryo or that yet-to-be-determined ligands of the receptor exist (Haiko et al. 2008). VEGFR-3 and PROX1 are closely related as it was recently shown that VEGFR-3 regulates PROX1 expression via a positive feedback loop in LECs (Srinivasan et al. 2014). Lymphatic development is not compromised in Vegfd-deficient mice, but exogenous VEGF-D can rescue 20 the phenotype of Vegfc-/- mice (Baldwin et al. 2005, Karkkainen et al. 2004). The separation of lymphatic vessels from the blood vasculature in the mouse embryo is controlled by SYK (Spleen tyrosine kinase) and the adaptor protein SLP76 (SH2 domain-containing leukocyte protein of 76kDa), and a deficiency of either one leads to abnormal lymphaticovenous connections, bloodfilled lymphatic vessels and chylous ascites (Abtahian et al. 2003). Platelets are also a prerequisite for lymphatico-venous separation, as they block the entry of blood into the developing lymphatic vessels (Zheng, Aspelund & Alitalo 2014). Podoplanin, which apart from being an early marker of LEC differentiation, also binds to platelet CLEC-2 (C-type lectin domain family 2) receptor and activates downstream SYK-SLP76 signaling (Finney et al. 2012, Bertozzi et al. 2010). Several molecules have been implicated in the maturation process of the lymphatics. FOXC2 regulates the differentiation of the lymphatic capillary from the collecting lymphatic vessel phenotype through an interaction with NFATc1 (Nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin dependent 1), which is present in LECs during the maturation of collecting lymphatic vessels (Norrmen et al. 2009). Foxc2-/- mice display agenesis of lymphatic valves in the collecting vessels as well as ectopic coverage of SMCs and BM in capillaries (Petrova et al. 2004). Many of the axonal guidance molecules, which play significant roles during blood vessel growth, also participate in lymphangiogenesis. Ephrin-B2, a member of the Eph receptor tyrosine kinase family, is essential for the maturation of collecting lymphatic vessels and valves. (Eichmann, Makinen & Alitalo 2005, Makinen et al. 2005.) Signaling of another axon guidance molecule, semaphorin 3A, via an interaction of its NRP1 and plexin A1 receptors, is required for lymphatic valve formation (Jurisic et al. 2012, Bouvree et al. 2012). Furthermore, mice lacking Angpt2 (angiopoietin 2) display defective lymphatic remodeling and agenesis of valves, which can be genetically rescued with Angpt1 (Dellinger et al. 2008, Gale et al. 2002). After the first few postnatal weeks, signaling via VEGFR-3 is no longer required for the maintenance of pre-existing vessels, and the lymphatic vessels regenerate even should there be sustained inhibition of VEGFR-3, indicating that other factors in addition to VEGF-C/-D are required for the growth and stability of lymphatic vessels during adulthood (Karpanen et al. 2006b). Potential postnatal factors responsible for the VEGFR-3-independent pathway include VEGF-A, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and the angiopoietins, which are all known to act as stimulators of lymphangiogenesis (Karpanen et al. 2006b, Kajiya et al. 2005, Tammela et al. 2005, Hong et al. 2004, Gale et al. 2002). Physiological formation of new lymphatic vessels in adult tissues is infrequent, occurring mainly during ovarian follicle growth and wound healing by sprouting from pre-existing vessels (Brown, Robker & Russell 2010, Paavonen et al. 2000). Pathological lymphangiogenesis is associated with tumor growth and metastasis, as well as with inflammation (Karpanen, Alitalo 2008). It remains unclear whether lymphatic vessel growth in adults is solely due to sprouting, or whether it involves incorporation of circulating or BM-EPCs, capable of transdifferentiating into LECs (see chapter 2.2.3 “Vasculogenesis”). Their role has been claimed to have been demonstrated in mice models as well as in human kidney transplants, but it remains a topic of some controversy (Kerjaschki et al. 2006, Buttler et al. 2006, Religa et al. 2005). 21 Figure 4. Developmental lymphangiogenesis. Expression of PROX1 marks the first LECs within embryonic veins. VEGFR-3 signaling is focal throughout lymphangiogenic growth and is enhanced by NRP2. FOXC2, Ephrin-B2, NRP1 and ANG2 among other factors are involved in the regulation of the late stages of lymphatic differentiation. Adapted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol., Adams & Alitalo, “Molecular regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis” © 2007. 2.3.3 Lymphatic vessel markers The identification of several lymphatic vascular specific molecular markers has made possible the distinction between blood and lymphatic vessels and facilitated research into finding targets for selectively promoting or inhibiting lymphangiogenesis in pathological conditions. Lymphatic capillaries and the collecting vessels differ in their pattern of lymphatic endothelial marker expression (Norrmen et al. 2011). The earliest marker indicating lymphatic endothelial competence during embryonic development, as well as one of the most widely exploited lymphatic markers, is lymphatic vascular endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE-1) (Banerji et al. 1999). This protein is highly expressed in lymphatic capillaries but mostly absent from collecting lymphatics (Tammela et al. 2007, Makinen et al. 2005). Other markers expressed in mature lymphatic capillaries include PROX1, VEGFR-3, and the transmembrane glycoprotein, podoplanin (Johnson et al. 2008, Wigle, Oliver 1999, Breiteneder-Geleff et al. 1999, Kaipainen et al. 1995). In mature collecting vessels, expression of VEGFR-3, PROX1, and FOXC2 is downregulated from the high levels observed during development (Norrmen et al. 2011). One further distinction between lymphatic capillaries and collecting lymphatics can be made with SMCs: collecting lymphatics are covered by SMCs unlike lymphatic capillaries (Jurisic, Detmar 2009). Interestingly, intraluminal collecting vessel valves display a different molecular expression pattern from the nearby cells of the collecting vessel trunk, with high levels of VEGFR-3, PROX1, and FOXC2 (Norrmen et al. 2011). Both lymphatic and blood vascular endothelium express the adhesion molecule CD31 (PECAM-1) (Jurisic, Detmar 2009). 2.3.4 Lymph nodes Lymph nodes are discrete, bean-shaped organs composed of fibrovascular tissue and surrounded by a collagenous capsule (Figure 5) (Young et al. 2006). They act as filters to trap 22 infectious agents, as well as hubs for lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) (Kumar, Abbas & Fausto 2005). Humans have approximately 450 identifiable lymph nodes, which exist mostly in groups at circulation bottlenecks, e.g. in axillae, groins and the neck (Young et al. 2006, Willard-Mack 2006). Lymph nodes are highly plastic and enlarge greatly when mounting an immunological response (Young et al. 2006). Lymph flows into the lymph node via afferent lymphatics that pierce the capsule, subsequently passing through the nodal medullary sinuses, and finally exiting through the hilum into efferent lymphatic vessels (Guyton, Hall 2006). The uninterrupted influx of lymph and APCs through the afferent lymphatic vessels is a prerequisite for the maintenance of lymph nodes, and without constant flow lymph nodes will atrophy and regress in size (Tammela et al. 2007, Mebius et al. 1991). Atrophy is characterized by lymphoid depletion, i.e. a decrease in the number of germinal centers and depletion of paracortical lymphocytes, and it can either be focal, multifocal or diffuse within a lymph node (Elmore 2006). Lymphocytes, the cells which are responsible for acquired immunity, are exposed to a variety of antigens in lymph nodes. They circulate continually between the lymphatic and blood vasculature, and enter the lymph nodes mainly by migrating across the walls of special postcapillary venules called high endothelial venules. (Young et al. 2006.) The T and B cells interact with APCs and undergo clonal expansion in their respective areas inside the node: B cells proliferate within the follicles to form distinctive germinal centers, which are subsequently referred to as secondary follicles, whereas T cells proliferate in the paracortex concomitantly enlarging it (Willard-Mack 2006). B cells mature into plasma cells that secrete antibodies and exit the node along with the efferent lymph in order to circulate to the site of damage (Young et al. 2006). Tissue macrophages line the sinusoids of lymph nodes and phagocytize any foreign particles that might enter the sinus by way of the lymph (Guyton, Hall 2006). Tingible body macrophages are a type of macrophages containing apoptotic cell debris; these cells are found predominantly in the germinal centers (Willard-Mack 2006). It was believed for over a century that lymph nodes arise from embryonic primitive lymph sacs, when a mesenchymal bud protrudes into the sac and begins to acquire endothelial coverage in tandem with its expansion (Mebius 2003). However, recent research has revealed that lymph node formation is at least initiated normally in mice devoid of lymph sacs, although the following hematopoietic cell clustering within the lymph nodes is attenuated (Vondenhoff et al. 2009). Nevertheless, a highly coordinated series of interactions between hematopoietic cells and stromal cells residing at sites of future lymphoid organs is crucial for the development of secondary lymphoid organs (van de Pavert, Mebius 2010). They do not all develop at the same time, but sequentially, with the mesenteric lymph nodes forming first and Peyer’s patches last (Mebius 2003). The genes regulating lymphoid organogenesis differ from those regulating lymphangiogenesis, for example, lymphotoxin beta receptor signaling is pivotal for lymph node development but not essential for lymphatic vessel development (Furtado et al. 2007, Futterer et al. 1998). New lymph nodes do not form after embryogenesis, although the development of socalled isolated lymphoid follicles occurs in the small intestine of adults (Randall, Carragher & Rangel-Moreno 2008). Moreover, tertiary lymphoid tissues develop in adult non-lymphoid organs in response to chronic inflammation, infection, and autoimmunity (Carragher, RangelMoreno & Randall 2008). Intriguingly, artificial lymph nodes composed of stromal and dendritic cells embedded in collagenous scaffolds have been shown to induce potent immune responses in immune-deficient mice, pointing to a novel approach for strengthening the immune system or replacing damaged lymph nodes (Okamoto et al. 2007). 23 Figure 5. The structure of a lymph node. Lymph from the afferent lymphatic vessels flows through the subcapsular, trabecular and ultimately medullary sinuses, which converge at the hilum. Lymph then exits the lymph node via the efferent lymphatic vessel. Valves in the lymphatic vessels prevent backflow. Public domain image, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. 2.4 MOLECULAR REGULATION OF BLOOD AND LYMPHATIC VESSEL GROWTH 2.4.1 Hypoxia-inducible factors HIFs are highly-conserved transcription factors that regulate the hypoxic response in all metazoan species examined to date (Loenarz et al. 2011). They activate transcriptionally 100-200 genes that are involved in erythropoiesis, angiogenesis, autophagocytosis and energy metabolism (Kaelin, Ratcliffe 2008). HIF-1 is a heterodimer composed of a constitutively expressed beta subunit, and an alpha unit that is also continually translated but subjected to rapid proteasomal degradation under normoxic conditions (Huang et al. 1996, Wang et al. 1995). Degradation occurs when two proline residues of the alpha subunit are hydroxylated by prolyl-hydroxylases in the presence of O2, followed by the binding of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein (pVHL) and concomitant recruitment of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase, which eventually leads to ubiquitylation and degradation of HIF-1α by a proteasome (Figure 6) (Jaakkola et al. 2001, Kamura et al. 2000, Maxwell et al. 1999). Conversely, the rate of HIF hydroxylation is suppressed by hypoxia. When oxygen is not readily available, HIF-1α accumulates and is transported to the nucleus, where it dimerizes with HIF-1β and binds to hypoxia responsive element (HRE) of the target gene promoter (Semenza et al. 1996, Wang et al. 1995). HIF-1 has many target genes, e.g. erythropoietin, VEGF-A, VEGFR-1, and PDK1 (Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, isozyme 1), which is capable of reducing oxygen consumption of cells, maintaining ATP (adenosine triphosphate) levels under hypoxia, and attenuating mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production to rescue cells from hypoxia-induced apoptosis (Papandreou et al. 2006, Kim et al. 2006, Gerber et al. 1997, Jiang et al. 1996, Forsythe et al. 1996). The transcriptional activity of HIF is further regulated by the factor inhibiting HIF-1 (FIH-1), which represses its transactivation function in normoxic and moderately hypoxic conditions (Mahon, Hirota & Semenza 2001). The pivotal role of HIF-1 in the development of the circulatory system is underlined by the fact that Hif1α-/- mice die by E10.5 due to cardiac malformations, vascular defects and impaired erythropoiesis (Yoon et al. 2006, Iyer et al. 1998). Increased HIF-1α expression contributes to tumor progression, whereas loss of HIF activity 24 results in decreased tumor growth, thus making it a potential therapeutic target (Semenza 2010). Conversely, HIF-1 can mediate protective physiological responses in ischemic diseases by activating genes encoding multiple angiogenic growth factors, and it has been shown to promote arteriogenesis and to increase muscle perfusion in occluded rabbit hindlimbs (Patel et al. 2005). Due to its role as a master regulator of hypoxic angiogenesis, HIF-1 has been proposed to represent a better therapeutic target than a single angiogenic factor (Semenza 2012). Interestingly, recent findings have suggested that HIF-1α may also have a central role in the initiation and regulation of lymphangiogenesis in response to hypoxia, inflammation and lymphatic stasis (Zampell et al. 2012, Bridges et al. 2012). HIF-2α has a similar structure to HIF-1α but a different expression pattern, as HIF-2α is only expressed in certain tissues in contrast to the ubiquitously expressed HIF-1α. HIF-2α expression is prevalent in endothelium, as well as in well-vascularized tissues like kidney, lung, heart, and small intestine. (Wiesener et al. 2003, Tian, McKnight & Russell 1997, Ema et al. 1997.) Hif2α-/mice die by E16.5 because of bradycardia, vascular defects, and incomplete lung maturation (Compernolle et al. 2002, Tian et al. 1998). The two HIF-α subunits regulate both common and unique target genes. HIF-2α is unable to activate HIF-1α regulated glycolytic enzymes such as lactate dehydrogenase, but enhances the expression of some of the same angiogenic target genes as HIF-1α, e.g. VEGF-A and VEGFR-1 (Takeda et al. 2004, Hu et al. 2003). HIF-2α has been shown to induce angiogenesis in a mouse model of wound healing (Takeda et al. 2004). Moreover, it has been found to promote tumorigenesis, particularly in neuroblastoma and renal cell carcinoma (Holmquist-Mengelbier et al. 2006, Kondo et al. 2003). HIF-3α, another HIF isoform, is claimed to be an inhibitory regulator of angiogenesis and hypoxic response, and it is highly expressed in the cornea, where there is a low level of hypoxia-inducible VEGF-A expression and an avascular phenotype (Makino et al. 2001). 25 Figure 6. HIF signaling under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Under normal oxygen supply, proline residues of HIF-1α are hydroxylated by prolyl hydroxylase, followed by the binding of the Von Hippel-Lindau protein (pVHL), which is a component of a ubiquitin ligase complex. This leads to HIF1α ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. When there is a poor oxygen supply, hydroxylation is inhibited leading to accumulation of HIF-1α, which is transported to the nucleus where it dimerizes with HIF-1β and then binds to the hypoxia-response element (HRE) of target genes, activating their transcription. © 2013 Paula Province, Corinne E. Griguer, Xiaosi Han, Nabors Louis B. and Hassan Fathallah Shaykh. Adapted from “Evolution of the Molecular Biology of Brain Tumors and the Therapeutic Implications”, originally published under CC BY 3.0 license. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53298 2.4.2 Vascular endothelial growth factors and their receptors VEGFs are secreted glycoproteins with several isoforms generated by alternative splicing and post-translational processing (Jeltsch et al. 2013). They are the main regulators of blood and lymphatic vessel formation during embryological development as well as in physiological and pathological conditions in adults. The VEGF family comprises VEGF-A, placental growth factor (PlGF), VEGF-B, VEGF-C and VEGF-D. (Lohela et al. 2009.) In addition to these five members found in mammals, viral VEGF homologues (VEGF-E) produced by Orf viruses and snake venom VEGF (VEGF-F) have been identified (Yamazaki, Morita 2006, Ogawa et al. 1998). VEGFs bind to cellular receptor tyrosine kinases VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 as well as to co-receptors NRP1 and NRP2 with varying affinities and selectivities (Lohela et al. 2009). Additionally, there is a heparin binding domain in VEGF that interacts with heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG), which are also able to serve as co-receptors (Koch et al. 2011). The VEGFs and their binding to VEGF and NRP receptors are illustrated in Figure 7. 26 Figure 7. VEGFs and their receptors. VEGF-A binds to both VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, whereas VEGF-B and PlGF bind to only VEGFR-1. VEGF-C and -D bind to both VEGFR-3 and VEGFR-2. NRP1 and NRP2 act as co-receptors and modulate VEGFR activation and signaling. All VEGFs bind to both NRP1 and NRP2, except for VEGF-B, which binds to only NRP1. Different VEGF-A isoforms have different binding properties towards the NRP receptors. Adapted by permission from The American Physiological Society: Physiol Rev., de Almodovar et al., “Role and Therapeutic Potential of VEGF in the Nervous System” © 2009. 2.4.2.1 VEGF-A VEGF-A binds to VEGFR-1 and -2 and is upregulated under hypoxic conditions (Ferrara, Gerber & LeCouter 2003, Minchenko et al. 1994). It is produced in at least eight different isoforms due to alternative splicing of mRNA from a single VEGFA gene (Dehghanian, Hojati & Kay 2014). VEGF-A165 is the most abundant and biologically active isoform that binds to VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, NRP1 and NRP2. In addition, VEGF-A165 is able to bind HSPGs. Different VEGF-A isoforms vary in their affinities towards NRP and HSPG co-receptors. (Koch et al. 2011.) VEGF-A has a dominant role in embryonic vasculogenesis and angiogenesis, as Vegfa+/embryos die between E11 and E12 due to defects in blood vessel formation (Carmeliet et al. 1996). In addition, VEGF-A has been shown to increase vascular permeability, to promote EC proliferation and migration, to inhibit apoptosis, and to induce vasodilation indirectly via NO release. Excessive levels of VEGF-A contribute to several pathological conditions, such as tumor angiogenesis, diabetic retinopathy and polycystic ovary syndrome. (Ferrara, Gerber & LeCouter 2003.) Consequently, VEGF-A has become the primary drug target for antiangiogenic therapy with several VEGF-A–based inhibitors approved for clinical use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (Crawford, Ferrara 2009). However, only a fraction of patients appear to benefit from the therapeutic blockade of angiogenesis, as tumors are capable of developing 27 resistance mechanisms to VEGF-A inhibitors (Bergers, Hanahan 2008). In addition to being the key regulator of angiogenesis, VEGF-A has been shown to induce the growth of lymphatic vessels, which although abnormal in shape and functionality, become VEGF-A independent once formed and persist indefinitely (Nagy et al. 2002). However, the lymphangiogenic effects of VEGF-A have been attributed to the recruitment of VEGFR-1 expressing inflammatory cells that secrete lymphangiogenic factors (Cursiefen et al. 2004). The weak lymphangiogenic potential of VEGF-A is supported by the observation that deletion of Vegfr2 from lymphatic vessels results in hypoplastic but functional lymphatic vessels in embryos and adult mice (Dellinger et al. 2013). 2.4.2.2 VEGF-B VEGF-B is a ligand for VEGFR-1 and NRP1, and unlike VEGF-A, it is not regulated by hypoxia (Makinen et al. 1999, Enholm et al. 1997). It is produced in two isoforms: freely soluble VEGFB186 and heparin-binding VEGF-B167 (Olofsson et al. 1996b). VEGF-B is abundantly expressed in tissues with active energy metabolism needs, such as myocardium, striated muscle and brown fat, indicating a role in supporting metabolic functions. In many tissues, VEGF-B is coexpressed with VEGF-A, and the two can also join to form heterodimers which then bind to VEGFR-2. (Bry et al. 2014, Olofsson et al. 1996a.) Although the ability of VEGF-B to induce angiogenesis in most tissues is weak, it has been shown to be a promising candidate for both therapeutical angiogenesis in myocardium as well as in the prevention of heart failure (Huusko et al. 2012, Lahteenvuo et al. 2009). Vegfb-/- mice have been reported to have small hearts and impaired recovery from ischemia, but they are viable and fertile in contrast to Vegfa knockout mice. Thus, VEGF-B is not essential for the development of the cardiovascular system. (Aase et al. 2001, Bellomo et al. 2000.) 2.4.2.3 VEGF-C VEGF-C is a primarily lymphangiogenic factor that binds to VEGFR-3 and NRP2 with high affinity in its full length, unprocessed form, and with increasing affinity to VEGFR-2 in its proteolytically processed form (Xu et al. 2010, Joukov et al. 1997). The full length form is mainly lymphangiogenic, which is in agreement with its strong binding to VEGFR-3, whereas the mature short form promotes angiogenesis and vascular permeability via VEGFR-2 (Veikkola et al. 2001, Cao et al. 1998, Joukov et al. 1997). CCBE1 has been shown recently to enhance the proteolytic cleavage of inactive VEGF-C into a potent form, which is able to activate its cognate receptor VEGFR-3 (Jeltsch et al. 2014). During embryogenesis, VEGF-C is highly expressed in regions of lymphatic vessel development (Kukk et al. 1996). In Vegfc-/- mice, ECs cannot sprout to form lymphatic vessels, whereas Vegfc+/- mice display lymphatic hypoplasia and lymphedema (Karkkainen et al. 2004). The expression of VEGF-C decreases in most fully developed tissues but remains high in lymph nodes (Saaristo et al. 2012, Lymboussaki et al. 1999). Overexpression of VEGF-C has proven effective in the induction of lymphatic vessel growth in several animal models (Tammela et al. 2007, Saaristo et al. 2002a, Enholm et al. 2001). Although VEGF-C does not appear to increase the growth of primary tumors, it has been shown to promote lymphatic metastasis of tumor cells (Hirakawa et al. 2007, Skobe et al. 2001). The expression of VEGF-C and VEGF-D directly correlates with lymphatic invasion, lymph node involvement, distant metastasis, and sometimes poor prognosis of survival (Achen, Stacker 2008). An engineered isoform of VEGF-C, VEGF-C156S, has been shown to be a selective agonist of VEGFR-3 and capable of inducing lymphangiogenesis but it does not exert any effects on the blood vasculature (Rissanen et al. 2003b, Saaristo et al. 2002b, Joukov et al. 1998). 28 2.4.2.4 VEGF-D VEGF-D, like VEGF-C, is considered to be a lymphangiogenic factor, although it is not essential for the formation of the lymphatic system and its physiological role remains unclear. Vegfd-/mice are healthy and do not diplay any obvious abnormalities in their phenotype. (Baldwin et al. 2005.) Endogenous VEGF-D is not able to compensate for the lack of VEGF-C in embryonic lymphatic development, although in Vegfc-/- mice, exogenous VEGF-D can rescue sprouting of ECs committed to the lymphatic lineage, at least to some extent (Karkkainen et al. 2004). The expression of VEGF-D in the adult is strongest in the heart, lung, skeletal muscle, and the intestine (Achen et al. 1998). The binding affinity of VEGF-D to its receptors is very similar to that of VEGF-C, with the full-length form binding primarily to VEGFR-3 and NRP2, and the mature, proteolytically processed form (VEGF-DΔNΔC) preferring VEGFR-2 (McColl et al. 2007, Achen et al. 1998). The fully processed form of VEGF-D has a 290-fold greater affinity towards VEGFR-2 than the full-length VEGF-D (Stacker et al. 1999). Proteolytic prosessing is required for the angiogenic activity of VEGF-D, and in concordance with this, VEGF-DΔNΔC has been found to induce strong angiogenesis in rabbit hind limb skeletal muscle (Rissanen et al. 2003b). Over-expression of full-length VEGF-D and VEGF-DΔNΔC alike has been shown to induce lymphatic vessel growth in mice (Tammela et al. 2007, Veikkola et al. 2001). Importantly, with regard to safety considerations, VEGF-D has been implicated in tumor metastasis and spontaneous tumor formation (Karkkainen et al. 2009, Ishii et al. 2004). 2.4.2.5 PlGF PlGF is expressed in placenta, thyroid and lungs in the adult, and binds VEGFR-1 as well as NRP1 and NRP2 (Fischer et al. 2008, Ziche et al. 1997, Clauss et al. 1996). PlGF has four different isoforms in humans, of which PlGF-1 and -3 are freely soluble and -2 and -4 bind to heparin (Yang et al. 2003, Cao et al. 1997). The deletion of PlGF does not cause any overt vascular defects or infertility in mice. Although PlGF is redundant for angiogenesis during development, it appears to be angiogenic in pathological settings, as Plgf-/- mice exhibit impaired angiogenesis and arteriogenesis during ischemia, inflammation, wound healing and tumor growth. (Carmeliet et al. 2001.) Over-expression of PlGF has been shown to induce revascularization of ischemic limb and myocardium and enhanced healing of wounds in diabetic mice (Cianfarani et al. 2006, Luttun et al. 2002). Its angiogenic properties are at least in part explained by its ability to enhance VEGF-A signaling. Firstly, PlGF can displace VEGF-A from VEGFR-1, thus allowing VEGF-A to bind VEGFR-2, resulting in angiogenic signaling (Fischer et al. 2008). Secondly, PlGF can upregulate the expression of VEGF-A and other angiogenic growth factors (Roy et al. 2005). Furthermore, an intermolecular crosstalk between VEGFR-1 and -2 occurs when VEGFR-1 is activated by PlGF, which consequently promotes VEGF-A mediated angiogenesis (Autiero et al. 2003). PlGF is also able to signal through VEGFR-1 independently of VEGF-A (Fischer et al. 2008). However, there are a few studies indicating that PlGF might be a weak EC mitogen in vitro and capable of inducing only a weak signal via VEGFR-1 (Migdal et al. 1998, Park et al. 1994). 2.4.2.6 VEGF-receptors VEGFs bind to their cognate tyrosine kinase receptors, VEGFRs, on the cell surface, causing them to dimerize and become activated through transphosphorylation, which then leads to coordination of the cellular responses regulated by downstream signaling molecules. VEGFRs comprise an extracellular, ligand-binding domain consisting of seven immunoglobulin-like domains, a transmembrane domain, a juxtamembrane domain, an intracellular split tyrosine kinase domain, and a C-terminal tail. (Koch et al. 2011.) Receptor activity is largely controlled by trafficking mechanisms, e.g. regulating the numbers of receptors at the cell surface, the rate at which these receptors are internalized, and the degradation vs. recycling of receptors (Zhang, Simons 2014). 29 VEGFR-1 is necessary for the development of the embryonic vasculature, as Vegfr1-/- mice form abnormal vascular structures and die in utero. The disorganization of vasculature was found to be a consequence of excess EC progenitors, evidence of an inhibitory role for VEGFR-1 in the regulation of angiogenesis. (Fong et al. 1999, Fong et al. 1995.) VEGFR-1 displays a high afiinity towards VEGF-A, VEGF-B and PlGF, the latter two of which share structural similarities (Tammela et al. 2005). VEGFR-1 also has a naturally occurring soluble form (sVEGFR-1) comprising the extracellular part of VEGFR-1; this is thought to act as a VEGF-A trap, further implying an inhibitory role for this receptor in VEGF-A induced angiogenesis (Hiratsuka et al. 1998, Kendall, Thomas 1993). In contrast, VEGFR-1 is capable of promoting proangiogenic signals by binding PlGF and thereby indirectly activating VEGFR-2 (Autiero et al. 2003). The expression of VEGFR-1 is directly upregulated by hypoxia via a HIF binding enhancer element in the VEGFR-1 promoter, and it is expressed not only in ECs but also in macrophages, pericytes, renal mesangial cells, placental trophoblasts and many other cell types (Tammela et al. 2005, Gerber et al. 1997). VEGFR-1 is able to transmit only weak mitogenic signals in ECs by itself. However, it can form heterodimers with VEGFR-2 that possess a stronger signaling capacity. (Huang et al. 2001.) VEGFR-1 has also been shown to engage in macrophage recruitment to promote tissue remodeling (Pipp et al. 2003). VEGFR-2 is the main mediator of EC differentiation, proliferation and migration, as well as vascular tube formation and vascular permeability (Koch et al. 2011, Gille et al. 2001). Ligand binding to VEGFR-2 leads to a robust angiogenic response. VEGFR-2 binds VEGF-A, the mature forms of VEGF-C and VEGF-D, VEGF-E, and also VEGF-F. (Koch et al. 2011, Yamazaki et al. 2003.) It is highly expressed in the vascular endothelium during embryogenesis (Quinn et al. 1993). VEGFR-2 is pivotal for the development of the vascular system, as Vegfr2-/- mice die between E8.5-9.5 after failing to develop endothelial and hematopoietic cells (Shalaby et al. 1995). Recent research has pointed to a role for VEGFR-2 in lymphatic vessel sprouting as well (Dellinger et al. 2013). After birth, VEGFR-2 expression decreases but is upregulated again in times of physiological and pathological angiogenesis in the adult (Jeltsch et al. 2013). VEGFR-2, like VEGFR-1, has a soluble form, which acts as a VEGF-C trap, preventing VEGF-C from binding to VEGFR-3 and consequently inhibiting its lymphangiogenic effects (Albuquerque et al. 2009). VEGFR-3 has an important role in the formation of the lymphatic system and it is activated by both the full-length and the processed forms of VEGF-C and VEGF-D (Jeltsch et al. 2013). VEGF-C binding to VEGFR-3 triggers signals to promote proliferation, migration and survival of LECs (Salameh et al. 2005, Makinen et al. 2001). VEGFR-3 activation can also occur independently of ligand-binding and in response to mechanical signals. An elevation in the interstitial pressure in mice embryos was found to be sufficient to phosphorylate VEGFR-3, thereby promoting LEC proliferation and lymphatic vessel growth. (Planas-Paz et al. 2012.) The key role of VEGFR-3 in lymphatic function is highlighted by the fact that missense mutations in this receptor lead to hereditary lymphedema in humans and a similar condition in mice (Karkkainen et al. 2001, Karkkainen et al. 2000, Irrthum et al. 2000). VEGFR-3 is expressed in all endothelia at the beginning of development but it becomes restricted to LECs, with the exception of some fenestrated capillaries e.g. those found in endocrine organs, as the lymphatic system starts to develop (Partanen et al. 2000, Kaipainen et al. 1995). In addition to being expressed in normal lymphatics, VEGFR-3 appears as a positive marker in some pathological conditions such as vascular tumors and neovascularization of nonvascular tumors (Partanen, Alitalo & Miettinen 1999). VEGFR-3 is known to play a crucial role in the formation of the vascular system already before the appearance of lymphatics, as indicated by the finding that Vegfr3-/- mice die in utero due to the defective formation of vasculature and cardiovascular failure (Dumont et al. 1998). VEGFR-3 is able to heterodimerize with VEGFR-2, and these heterodimers appear to be active in sprouting angiogenesis (Nilsson et al. 2010). Moreover, antibodies against VEGFR-3, which inhibit both VEGFR-3 homodimerization and VEGFR2/VEGFR-3 heterodimerization, lead to decreased vascular and lymphatic EC migration and 30 vessel sprouting (Tvorogov et al. 2010). Similarly as in the case of VEGFR-2, the soluble form of VEGFR-3 appears to limit the local activity of VEGFR-3 and subsequent lymphangiogenesis in some tissues, such as the cornea (Singh et al. 2013). 2.4.2.7 NRP-receptors NRP1 and NRP2 are receptors for class 3 semaphorins, which mediate inhibitory signals during neuronal axon guidance (Koch et al. 2011). They also engage in angiogenesis and VEGFR signaling where they act as co-receptors, with NRP1 binding VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, PlGF and VEGF-E, and NRP2 binding VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D and PlGF (Uniewicz, Fernig 2008, Karpanen et al. 2006a, Makinen et al. 1999, Soker et al. 1998). NRPs have been postulated to play a role in determining the arterial or venous fate of blood vessels, since in the course of embryonic development, NRP1 expression is mostly prevalent in arteries and NRP2 primarily marks veins (Herzog et al. 2001). NRP1 contributes to EC migration and survival owing to its effects on VEGF-A-VEGFR-2 interactions (Koch et al. 2011). Additionally, it has been linked to VEGFR-2 mediated vascular permeability and VEGF-A induced sprouting and branching of ECs (Kawamura et al. 2008, Becker et al. 2005). The deletion of the Nrp1 gene is lethal, causing a wide range of vascular and neuronal defects in mouse embryos, whereas over-expression of NRP1 leads to embryonic lethality in mice due to excessive formation of vessels, hemorrhages and cardiac malformations (Gu et al. 2003, Kawasaki et al. 1999, Kitsukawa et al. 1995). The blockade of NRP1 function with a specific antibody has reduced angiogenesis and vascular remodeling in vivo and rendered vessels more susceptible to anti-VEGF-A therapy in the battle against tumor growth (Pan et al. 2007). NRP2 is expressed not only in veins but also in lymphatic vessels and it can interact with VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 to promote the migration and the survival of ECs (Koch et al. 2011, Favier et al. 2006). Nrp2-/- mice are characterized by the absence of small lymphatic vessels and capillaries at birth, with blood vessels and larger collecting lymphatics developing normally. No signs of edema were observed in the nullizygous Nrp2 mice despite a reduced number of lymphatic vessels in the skin and the internal organs. Lymphatic vessel growth occurred postnatally in these mice, albeit abnormally patterned, particularly in the heart and the intestine. (Yuan et al. 2002.) The mechanism by which NRP2 could modulate lymphangiogenesis was later shown to be through an interaction with VEGFR-3 to mediate VEGF-C-induced lymphatic sprouting (Xu et al. 2010). Administration of an anti-NRP2 antibody was able to reduce the metastatic spread of tumor cells, tumoral lymphangiogenesis and functional lymphatics in tumors without affecting established lymphatics in mice (Caunt et al. 2008). 2.5 GENE THERAPY A gene, consisting of a sequence of DNA, is the fundamental unit of heredity that determines a particular characteristic in an organism (Nelson, Cox 2008). Gene therapy is a form of molecular medicine that utilizes genes in treating or preventing diseases. One can take different approaches to gene therapy, e.g. replacing a mutated disease-causing gene with a healthy copy of the gene, inactivating a mutated gene that is functioning undesirably, or introducing a new gene into target cells to help fight disease. (Wally, Murauer & Bauer 2012, Drude et al. 2007, YlaHerttuala, Alitalo 2003.) The possibility of using endogenous proteins to locally treat only the affected tissues as well as the potential long-term therapeutic effect achieved by a single application are considered as advantages of gene therapy over conventional therapeutic modalities (Yla-Herttuala, Alitalo 2003). 31 For gene therapy to achieve its goals, a sufficient amount of the therapeutic gene and/or its product should be delivered to the target cells without causing significant toxicity. The effect profile of gene transfer (GT) is determined by the chosen therapeutic gene, the vector carrying the gene, as well as the route of administration of the GT. Different diseases present different requirements for gene therapy in terms of the locality of the treatment and the duration of the gene expression. For example, in the case of some genetic disorders, long-term expression in a small proportion of cells might be sufficient, whereas inhibition of cancer growth would require gene transfer of tumor suppressor genes to a large number of abnormal cells. (Kay, Glorioso & Naldini 2001.) Carriers called vectors are engineered to deliver the therapeutic gene into target cells. At present, three types of gene delivery methods are available: viral vector based, non-viral vector based, and physical methods. Certain genetically modified viruses are able to deliver the desired gene by infecting the target cell, and viral vectors in general have the advantage of high delivery efficiency to a variety of cells. In contrast, non-viral vectors, such as naked DNA plasmids, are less toxic and immunogenic than viral vectors but exhibit lower delivery efficiencies. Physical methods make use of a physical force to overcome the membrane barrier of the cell, thereby enabling intracellular GT. There are different types of physical methods e.g. gene delivery by needle injection and sonoporation, which utilizes ultrasound to permeabilize the cell membrane. For the time being, both non-viral and physical methods of gene delivery are generally considered unacceptable for clinical use due to their significantly lower delivery efficacy in comparison to viral vectors. (Kamimura et al. 2011, Verma, Weitzman 2005.) The duration of transgene expression in the target cell depends on the vector. Some vectors e.g. retroviral vectors, have the ability to integrate into the genome of the host cell leading to long-term gene expression that can be passed onto daughter cells. In contrast, transient expression of only 2-4 weeks can be achieved by the use of adenoviruses. (Kamimura et al. 2011.) Vectors carrying the therapeutic gene can be delivered to the desired tissue by a range of different delivery routes. In the case of therapeutic angiogenesis, commonly used routes of delivery include local, intramuscular injections and systemic, intravascular delivery. Intravenous (i.v.) delivery is straightforward to execute in small animal models, but becomes impractical when applied to larger animals and humans due to their great blood and tissue volumes. (Karvinen, Yla-Herttuala 2010.) Furthermore, following the systemic spreading of the gene drug via i.v. administration, viral particles may tend to accumulate in unwanted destinations, mainly the liver, rather than in the target area (Lozier et al. 2002, Alemany, Suzuki & Curiel 2000). Local injections into the heart or skeletal muscles have proven to be most effective in achieving high expression of transgenes, and they also appear to be well tolerated (Karvinen, Yla-Herttuala 2010, Harvey et al. 2002). 2.5.1 Viral vectors Viruses have an inherent ability to hijack the machinery of a host cell in order to produce copious amounts of their own genome. This characteristic is exploited in gene therapy, where viral vectors are employed to deliver therapeutic genetic material into target cells. Viral vectors are derived from either RNA or DNA viruses and designated as either integrating or nonintegrating vectors. In the first phase of engineering a viral vector, the viral sequences required for replication, the assembly of viral particles, the packaging of the viral genome, and the delivery of the transgene, are identified. Next, inessential genes are deleted to make room for the transgene and to prevent replication, as well as to reduce pathogenity and the expression of immunogenic viral antigens. Subsequently, the transgene cassette is inserted into the vector construct, which is then introduced into a packaging cell line. In a packaging cell, a separate packaging construct or a helper virus supplies the proteins needed for replication and assembly of the virion. Finally, the recombinant viral vector is produced following the encapsidation of 32 the replicated vector genomes into virus particles. (Vannucci et al. 2013, Verma, Weitzman 2005.) Transduction denotes the delivery of genetic material into a precise cell via a viral vector. In this process, the viral vector itself does not replicate but merely carries the inserted genetic information to its destination. Retroviral and lentiviral vectors are able to integrate into the host genome holding the promise of lifelong expression, whereas DNA-based viral vectors are normally present as episomes in the host cell nucleus. (Vannucci et al. 2013, Kamimura et al. 2011.) An ideal vector would be one that could be produced in high titres, would be capable of targeting the appropriate cell type in each case, and would lead to a stable, sustained gene expression without eliciting adverse effects such as undesirable immune responses. No such vector exists as yet, but several approaches have been adopted to overcome obstacles related to production, targeting the desired tissues, efficient gene delivery and pathogenity. (Verma, Weitzman 2005.) 2.5.1.1 Adenoviral vectors Adenovirus was originally isolated from human adenoids in 1953 (Rowe et al. 1953). Its genome consists of a double-stranded linear DNA, and it is on average 36 kbp (kilobase pairs) in size (Davison, Benko & Harrach 2003). Usually the adenovirus infection in humans is mild but may pose life-threatening risks to immunocompromized individuals (Hendrickx et al. 2014). There are more than 100 Ad serotypes, including 51 identified human Ad serotypes; these are unevenly prevalent and commonly infect the lung epithelium and the gastrointestinal tract but also other organs (Sharma et al. 2009a). Several cell surface molecules are involved in the entry of the adenovirus into the cell, the most common being the Coxsackie-adenovirus receptor (CAR) for the majority of serotypes (Sharma et al. 2009a, Bergelson et al. 1997). Adenoviral vectors are mostly derived from the Ad5 serotype and to a lesser extent from serotype 2 (Verma, Weitzman 2005). They can be produced in high titres, they display tropism towards a variety of cell types, and they express the transgene at high levels, all of which make the adenovirus an attractive candidate for gene therapy. However, there is extensive preexisting immunity against the adenovirus in the population, and furthermore the adenoviral proteins are highly immunogenic in humans, which impact on the use of common serotypes and limit the number of administrations which can be given to the same individual. (Vannucci et al. 2013.) The expression of the transgene is transient and peaks in 1-7 days, waning to an undetectable level by 2-4 weeks due to both innate and acquired immune responses against viral proteins (Yang et al. 1996, Yang et al. 1994). The advantages and disadvantages of adenoviral vectors are listed in Table 2. Circumventing the antiadenovirus immunity has been a topic of intensive research. So-called “gutless” adenovirus vectors have been developed, where all the adenovirus genes are removed and the essential genes needed to create the vector are provided by the producer cells (Kamimura et al. 2011). Another approach is the concept of “seroswitch”, denoting the use of a different serotype adenovirus vector for the second administration, which provides another 1-2 weeks of expression (Mastrangeli et al. 1996). The short-term expression elicited by the immunogenicity of the adenovirus can also be exploited to advantage. Transient expression is suitable for applications aimed at building new biologic structures, such as that of VEGF gene transfer for the generation of neovasculature (Crystal 2014). The anti-adenovirus immunity limits the expression of the growth factor to a few weeks, but this can be sufficient for initiating angiogenesis (Mack et al. 1998). Moreover, the short-term expression of the transgene caters for the needs of cancer gene therapy, where the goal is to destroy tumoral cells (Vannucci et al. 2013). The strong immune response elicited by Ad can help augment the otherwise diminished immunity against tumor cells, further asserting its position as the most widely used oncolytic vector. Nevertheless, the lack of specific targeting due to widespread distribution of CAR and poor transduction of many tumor types because of low levels of CAR expression has warranted the development of several retargeting approaches. (Sharma et al. 2009b.) An example of this 33 retargeting is the use of hybrid Ad vectors, which are directed to other target-specific cellular receptors and have shown efficient transduction of CAR-deficient cells, reduced liver tropism and improved transduction of cancer cells in many different cancer types (Zheng et al. 2007, Suominen et al. 2006, Breidenbach et al. 2004, Kanerva et al. 2002). The potent anti-adenoviral immunity has also been harnessed to create vaccines against several pathogens and tumors (Krause, Worgall 2011). In summary, adenovirus vectors are the number one choice for highlevel, short-term expression or for deliberately evoking immunity. Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages of adenovirus vectors. Adapted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Mol Ther., Rissanen & Ylä-Herttuala, “Current Status of Cardiovascular Gene Therapy”, © 2007. Advantages Disadvantages High transduction efficiency Strongly immunogenic Transduce both dividing and non-dividing cells Prevalence of pre-existing anti-Ad immunity in the population High capacity to accomodate foreign DNA (~8 kbp) Predominant hepatotropism following systemic administration Well suited as oncolytic vector Transient expression (~14 days) Easy to produce in high titers 2.5.1.2 Other viral vectors Adeno-associated viruses (AAV) are small DNA viruses that belong to the Parvoviridae family. The wild type AAV requires co-infection with adenovirus or herpesvirus in order to replicate. In the absence of a helper virus, wild type AAV is able to integrate into chromosome 19, where it remains latent until rescued by a helper virus. However, current AAV vectors do not possess this property. The advantages of AAV vectors include their low immunogenicity, their potential for site-specific integration, their wide tropism, their long expression time, and their ability to transduce both dividing and quiescent cells. The two main handicaps of using AAVs as vectors are their limited cloning capacity that is unsuited for most therapeutic genes, and the difficulty to achieve high vector titers. Most gene therapy trials employing AAV as gene transfer vector are aimed at treating monogenic diseases. (Vannucci et al. 2013, Daya, Berns 2008.) Lentiviruses and retroviruses are RNA viruses capable of integrating into the genome of the host cell, thus inducing stable transgene expression. Following entry into the target cell, the reverse transcriptase converts the genomic RNA into double-stranded DNA, which is then integrated into the host chromosome. Lentiviruses are capable of transducing both nondividing and dividing cells, whereas retroviruses transduce only replicating cells. (Vannucci et al. 2013.) Lentiviral vectors have been successfully used to treat β-thalassemia as well as progressive cerebral demyelination in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy patients in clinical trials (Cartier et al. 2009, Kaiser 2009). Retroviral vectors have been applied in the treatment of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), which hampers T cell development and function, utilizing ex vivo gene transfer into autologous hematopoietic stem cells. Unfortunately, the use of firstgeneration retroviral vectors was associated with the occurrence of acute leukemia in clinical trials, which will be further discussed in chapter 2.5.3 “Safety issues in gene therapy”. (Touzot et al. 2014.) Other more uncommon viral vectors include poxviruses, also known as Vaccinia viruses, which have been mostly used for the production of recombinant proteins, oncolytic cancer therapy, and vaccination; baculoviruses which are convenient tools for recombinant protein 34 production in insect cells but they can also transduce a plethora of mammalian cell types; and Sindbis virus, which is an alphavirus capable of reaching metastatic tumors when systemically administered due to its natural tropism for tumor cells (Vannucci et al. 2013, Airenne et al. 2013, Quetglas et al. 2010). 2.5.2 Non-viral vectors Non-viral gene delivery methods can be categorized into natural vectors, such as plasmid DNA or small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), and synthetic carriers, such as liposomes or cationic polymers. Another classification categorizes non-viral vectors into either organic or inorganic delivery systems. (Dizaj, Jafari & Khosroushahi 2014.) The simplest non-viral delivery method is the naked DNA plasmid injection (Kamimura et al. 2011). DNA-based transposon vectors, such as the leading non-viral vector of gene therapy called Sleeping Beauty, are based on integration of transposon DNA, which contains a transgene, into chromosomal DNA by a transposase enzyme (Aronovich, McIvor & Hackett 2011). The advantages of non-viral methods over viral vectors include simple large scale production, lower immunogenicity, lack of preexisting immunity in patients, and unlimited therapeutic gene packaging capacity. The main limitation of non-viral vectors is their lower gene transfer efficiency in relation to viral vectors. (Yin et al. 2014.) That is why at present, the vast majority of gene therapy clinical trials have been conducted using viral vectors (http://www.abedia.com/wiley/vectors.php). Recently, a plasmid DNA encoding a major histocompatibility complex class I heavy and light chains of HLA-B7 and β2-microglobulin complexed with a lipid-based delivery system failed to reach its efficacy points in a Phase III clinical trial for the treatment of advanced metastatic melanoma (Hersey, Gallagher 2014). Some minor setbacks regarding the safety of non-viral vectors have arisen over the years, as plasmid DNA was found to cause prominent inflammation in skeletal muscle and humans receiving intracoronary plasmid liposomes suffered a transient fever. (Hedman et al. 2003, McMahon et al. 1998). However, no major adverse effects have been reported and non-viral vectors in general are considered to have a fairly unblemished safety profile. 2.5.3 Safety issues in gene therapy Worldwide, adenoviral vectors are the most commonly used vectors in gene therapy clinical trials, being utilized in 22.5% of all gene therapy trials (http://www.abedia.com/wiley/vectors.php). Consequently, extensive safety data from adenovirus vectors in several different clinical applications have accumulated, and a uniformly good safety profile has been outlined, suggesting that adenoviral gene therapy, when administered with relevant doses and the optimal route of administration, is safe and well tolerated (Muona et al. 2012, Hedman et al. 2009, Harvey et al. 2002, Crystal et al. 2002). Notwithstanding the generally good safety profile, adenoviral gene therapy resulted in the death of a young patient with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency in 1999. The patient suffered multiple organ failure four days after intraportal delivery of a high-dose adenovirus vector, and a severe anti-Ad immune response was later determined as the cause of death. (Raper et al. 2003.) This tragic incident warranted efforts to circumvent the anti-Ad immunity with various approaches, such as progressive deletion of the genes causing inflammation and stimulation of the host immune response (Vannucci et al. 2013). Another death of a genetherapy recipient occurred in an AAV trial for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in 2007, when a 36-year-old woman died 3 weeks after she had received a second intra-articular injection of the AAV-vector. However, her death was considered not to have been caused by AAV but by an infection made possible due to the strong immunosuppressive medication. (Williams 2007.) 35 Another major safety issue in viral vector gene therapy concerns the disruption of important genes in target cells. With integrating viruses, there is a risk of insertional mutagenesis which means that a mutation has been created by the insertion of new genetic material into a normal gene. Integration of the retrovirus into the host genome may have different outcomes, the most probable being integration outside a cellular coding sequence or inside an irrelevant gene. However, in worse case scenarios, integration may lead to the death of transduced cells if it disrupts a vital gene, or neoplastic proliferation if the integration activates a proto-oncogene. (Vannucci et al. 2013.) In 2000, it was reported that children suffering from a fatal form of SCID had been cured with retroviral gene therapy (Cavazzana-Calvo et al. 2000). Sadly, after the initial promising results, acute leukemias occurred in four of the nine patients. It was found that the transgene had integrated in proximity to different proto-oncogenes, leading to uncontrolled division of T cells and consequent leukemia. (Hacein-Bey-Abina et al. 2008, Hacein-Bey-Abina et al. 2003.) This tragedy prompted efforts to target the integration of transgenes to predetermined genomic areas (Wirth, Parker & Yla-Herttuala 2013). In the case of proangiogenic gene therapy, the most commonly used vectors are adenoviruses and plasmids, which express the transgene transiently and do not integrate into the host genome. More than 1000 patients have taken part in angiogenic gene therapy trials over the years and so far no major adverse effects have been reported. (Gupta, Tongers & Losordo 2009.) However, only a few long-term follow-up studies have been conducted. After the Kuopio Angiogenesis Trial (KAT), patients were followed for eight years and no increases in the incidence of cardiovascular events or other diseases were detected in patients receiving adenoviral VEGF-A therapy as compared to placebo (Hedman et al. 2009). Similarly, in a 10year follow-up study of patients receiving a local AdVEGF-A GT into an ischemic lower limb, the incidence of cancer, diabetes and retinopathy did not differ between the treatment and the control groups (Muona et al. 2012). One other aspect that needs to be considered in regard to safety of gene therapy is the transgene and its possible harmful effects. VEGF-C and VEGF-D, the factors that have been studied in this thesis, have been implicated in tumor formation and metastasis (Karkkainen et al. 2009, Hirakawa et al. 2007, Ishii et al. 2004, Skobe et al. 2001). Over-expression of VEGF-C has been shown to induce tumor reactive lymphadenopathy, which means that the lymphatic networks within the lymph node were enlarged even before the onset of metastasis, most likely facilitating the spreading of tumor cells (Hirakawa et al. 2007). Apart from tumor lymphangiogenesis, the proteolytically processed forms of VEGF-C and VEGF-D may contribute to tumor angiogenesis by binding VEGFR-2, as they have been shown to induce angiogenesis in many pathological settings, including cancer (Achen, Stacker 2008). However, normal lymph nodes constantly produce low levels of VEGF-C, and in the model used in this thesis, only transient over-expression of VEGF-C or VEGF-D is induced in the lymph node as a result of the adenoviral delivery (Saaristo et al. 2012). Nonetheless, for patient safety, it would be crucial to screen potential recipients of this kind of therapy very carefully, particularly since they often are individuals with a history of malignant disease. Thus far, no promotion of spontaneous tumor growth has been reported after therapeutic delivery of lymphangiogenic growth factors in experimental models. 2.6 PRECLINICAL AND CLINICAL STUDIES 2.6.1 Preclinical studies of lymphedema Lymphedema has been previously studied mostly in small animal models, although some large animal studies exist as well (Baker et al. 2010, Blum et al. 2010, Tammela et al. 2007, Yoon et al. 2003, Szuba et al. 2002, Saaristo et al. 2002b, Karkkainen et al. 2001). The most widely used lymphedema animal models comprise the canine hind limb model, the rabbit ear model, the 36 rodent limb model and the rodent tail model; in all of these models lymphedema is induced by a surgical procedure and in some cases, additional irradiation. However, all of the aforementioned models suffer from some major disadvantages. The previously used canine models demanded complex procedures, a long latency time before chronic lymphedema developed, and all in all they would be considered unethical today. Small animal models are appropriate for molecular studies, but do not sufficiently resemble the conditions encountered in human lymphedema, thus casting doubts about their clinical translation to the therapy of human patients. (Hadamitzky, Pabst 2008.) The major hurdle in the development of successful animal models has been the inability to replicate the chronic disease in a stable, reproducible format (Shin, Szuba & Rockson 2003). Recombinant VEGF-C, naked plasmid VEGF-C and adenoviral VEGF-C have all been shown to induce the growth of functional lymphatics and to ameliorate lymphedema in mice, rabbits or sheep (Baker et al. 2010, Cheung et al. 2006, Yoon et al. 2003, Szuba et al. 2002, Karkkainen et al. 2001). VEGF-C or VEGF-D in conjunction with lymph node transfer has helped rebuild the vascular anatomy after lymph node excision, reduce lymphedema, and even reconstitute the immunological barrier function of the transferred lymph nodes in a mouse model of lymphedema (Tammela et al. 2007). Recently, the approach of combining autologous lymph node transfer with the application of exogenous VEGF-C was further investigated in rats, with promising results regarding transplant regeneration and recovery of the lymphatic integrity (Schindewolffs et al. 2014, Sommer et al. 2012). Apart from VEGFs, other therapeutic agents used to treat secondary lymphedema in the experimental setting have included retinoic acids, anti-inflammatory drugs such as ketoprofen, as well as combined autologous bone marrow stromal cell and VEGF-C protein injections (Choi et al. 2012, Zhou et al. 2011, Nakamura et al. 2009). As yet, there are no clinical studies of gene therapy for lymphedema. 2.6.2 Preclinical studies of proangiogenic therapy for PAD In the context of cardiovascular diseases, proangiogenic therapies for the revascularization of tissues have been studied in animal models of myocardial and peripheral ischemia. In the most commonly used animal models of peripheral ischemia, ischemia is induced by ligation, excision or ameroid constriction of a large artery in the hindlimb of a mouse, rat or rabbit (Limbourg et al. 2009, Tang et al. 2005, Rissanen et al. 2005, Masaki et al. 2002, Baffour et al. 2000). Several proangiogenic factors have been tested using these models, including VEGFs, members of the FGF family, HIF-1α, and HGF (Dragneva, Korpisalo & Yla-Herttuala 2013). Both plasmid and adenoviral gene transfers of VEGF-A resulted in angiogenesis, increased muscle perfusion, and the formation of collateral arteries in ischemic rabbit hind limbs (Korpisalo et al. 2008a, Rissanen et al. 2005, Takeshita et al. 1996). Furthermore, AdVEGF-A gene transfer induced positive effects on tissue energy metabolism and exercise tolerance in ischemic rat hind limbs (Gowdak et al. 2000). However, local VEGF-A gene transfer has been demonstrated to evoke unfavorable effects as well, such as increased vascular permeability, edema, and disorganized, immature vascular structures (Karvinen et al. 2011, Weis, Cheresh 2005, Lee et al. 2000). Therefore, combinations of growth factors and factors modulating the expression of multiple downstream targets, such as HIF-1α, have been evaluated in attempts to elicit more physiological angiogenesis (Vincent, Feron & Kelly 2002). Increased angiogenesis and muscle perfusion were observed in ischemic rabbit hind limbs following an injection of naked DNA encoding HIF-1α (Vincent et al. 2000). Adenovirally delivered, constitutively active HIF-1α promoted collateral vessel formation and improved tissue perfusion in ischemic rabbit hind limbs (Li et al. 2011, Patel et al. 2005). In contrast to VEGF-A, HIF-1α delivered via AAV did not result in vascular leakiness in transduced normoxic mouse skeletal muscles (Pajusola et al. 2005). Importantly, HIF-1α was found to induce marked capillary sprouting in the non-ischemic muscles, whereas VEGF-A only induced endothelial proliferation without the formation of proper capillary structures (Pajusola et al. 2005). It has been claimed that the approach of 37 inducing angiogenesis at its onset by utilizing hypoxia-induced signaling would harness the innate mechanism that naturally generates angiogenesis in physiological as well as pathological states (Hadjipanayi, Schilling 2013). 2.6.3 Clinical studies of proangiogenic therapy for PAD The first effort to treat PAD in a human patient was made in 1996 with the administration of plasmid DNA encoding VEGF-A (Isner et al. 1996). In a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study conducted in patients with PAD manifesting as claudication and critical limb ischemia, intravascular delivery of adenoviral or plasmid liposome VEGF-A resulted in a significant increase in vascularity but not in any significant clinical improvements in comparison to controls (Makinen et al. 2002). Dose-dependent peripheral edema was observed in patients receiving intramuscular injections of low-dose or high-dose VEGF-A, providing evidence for bioactivity of adenoviral VEGF-A. Disappointingly, the efficacy end points, such as ABI, claudication onset time, and quality-of-life measures, showed no improvement following administration of AdVEGF-A. (Rajagopalan et al. 2003.) In another trial of intramuscularly administered plasmid VEGF-A, somewhat more promising results were obtained, as VEGF-A treated patients experienced fewer amputations, better skin ulcer healing, and hemodynamic improvement in comparison with controls (Kusumanto et al. 2006). Plasmid VEGF-A165 (Neovasculgen®) was approved for the treatment of PAD in Russia in 2011 (http://www.genetherapynet.com/january-2012.html). Intramuscular administration of AdHIF1α has resulted in a good safety profile, pain relief and ulcer healing in a small trial of 38 PAD patients, but a larger trial of 289 patients with intermittent claudication revealed no differences in peak walking time (exercise treadmill test), claudication onset time, ABI, or quality-of-life measurements between HIF-1α and placebo groups (Creager et al. 2011, Rajagopalan et al. 2007). A meta-analysis derived from a total of 12 randomized, controlled trials of proangiogenic gene therapy for PAD detected no benefit from gene therapy for all-cause mortality, amputations, or ulcer healing (Hammer, Steiner 2013). Several explanations have been offered as to why angiogenic gene therapy clinical trials have failed to produce evidence of benefit despite ample, encouraging preclinical data. The animals used in preclinical models are usually healthy, whereas patients are typically older. Older people may exhibit deficiencies in the recruitment of angiogenic cells and growth factor expression, and often suffer from multiple comorbidites, which may impede the response to ischemia. (Gupta, Tongers & Losordo 2009.) It has been proposed that the age-dependent reduction in VEGF-A expression may be attributable to reduced HIF-1 activity, which would explain the impairment in angiogenesis in the elderly (Bosch-Marce et al. 2007, Rivard et al. 2000). Other factors possibly accounting for the modest results obtained from clinical trials include inadequate dosing of the therapeutic drug, insufficient duration of exposure to the angiogenic agent, compromised delivery and poor vector transduction efficiency. In addition, the obvious differences between animals and humans with respect to physiology, body size, and the distance which collateral arteries or lymphatics need to span, should be taken into account. (Dragneva, Korpisalo & Yla-Herttuala 2013.) Thus, before embarking on clinical trials, it is essential that the therapeutic agent should be evaluated in a large animal model to support data obtained from small rodents. 38 39 3 Aims of the Study The aim of this thesis was to study the potential of two adenovirally delivered single growth factors, VEGF-C and VEGF-D, to achieve therapeutic lymphangiogenesis for the treatment of lymphedema, and furthermore, instead of administering only a single growth factor, to study the potential of influencing several angiogenic growth factors via adenoviral over-expression of HIF-1α/-2α in the treatment cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, the aim was to evaluate whether adenovirally induced, transient over-expression of growth factors would be sufficient to result in measurable functional improvements, such as improved lymphatic flow and enhanced energy metabolism in ischemic tissue in large animal models. The specific aims of each study were as follows: I To develop a novel large animal model of lymphedema which would better resemble the condition in human patients, and, then to use this model to test the possibilities of adenoviral VEGF-C and VEGF-D gene transfers in the induction of lymphangiogenesis to improve lymphatic flow. II To optimize adenoviral VEGF-C gene transfer in the large animal model of lymphedema for prospective clinical translation. III To compare the angiogenic effects of a single adenovirally delivered growth factor, VEGF-A, to the effects of adenoviral HIF-1α/-2α, which activate several proangiogenic growth factors, in normoxic and ischemic rabbit hindlimbs as well as in normoxic mouse myocardium. 40 41 4 Materials and Methods 4.1 ANIMAL MODELS A total of three animal models were used in this thesis: a novel pig model of lymphedema (Studies I and II), a previously developed model of rabbit hindlimb ischemia (Study III) (Rissanen et al. 2003a), and a murine myocardium model, where gene transfer was performed into the normoxic cardiac muscle of a mouse (Study III). All animal experiments were approved by the National Animal Experiment Board of Finland. 4.1.1 Pig model of lymphedema (I-II) As a continuation to previous small animal models of lymphedema, a novel large animal model was developed which would better resemble the features of lymphedema in human patients, such as the distance which lymphatic neovessels need to span and the volume of edema formation. The model was used in this thesis to test the lymphangiogenic potential of AdVEGFC and AdVEGF-D in combination with autologous lymph node transfer. After anesthetizing the pigs, the normally invisible lymphatic vessels of the inguinal area were rendered visible to the naked eye by the Patent Blue (Guerbet) tracer dye. To block lymphatic drainage from the lower limbs, the lymphatic vasculature surrounding the inguinal lymph node was damaged surgically, leaving the blood vascular pedicle intact to simulate microsurgical anastomosis of blood vessels to the lymph node (Figure 8A). Next, gene transfer was performed as described later, after which the pedicular lymph node was attached into the remaining tissue 4 cm lateral from its original position. This procedure mimicks lymph node transfer in human lymphedema patients in that the lymph node is vascularized but lacks all lymphatic connections. The animals were followed for 2 or 6 months postoperatively. The sizes of the transferred lymph nodes as well as those of unoperated contralateral lymph nodes were measured in three dimensions at euthanasia which occurred 2 months after the surgical procedure. In addition, samples from internal organs (heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, gonads) were collected for safety examination (I). 4.1.2 Rabbit model of hind limb ischemia (III) A rabbit model of acute hind limb ischemia was used to study the angiogenic and metabolic effects of AdHIFs in peripheral muscles. To induce ischemia in the calf region, the superficial part of the femoral artery was excised (Figure 8B). Additionally, two re-entry branches were ligated to block collateral growth from the lateral circumflex and deep femoral arteries. As a result, the calf region became severely ischemic but the thigh remained normoperfused. The animals were euthanized 7 days after the procedure and 6 days after GT. 42 Figure 8. A, The pig model of lymphedema and autologous lymph node transfer. The afferent and efferent lymphatic vessels surrounding the inguinal lymph node were excised, leaving only the main artery and vein supplying the node intact. Gene transfer was made either intranodally under the capsule of the node or perinodally into the fat surrounding the node. Reprinted by permission from Ann Surg.: May 2013 - Volume 257(5) - p 961-967, Wolters Kluwer Health Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ©. B, The rabbit model of hindlimb ischemia. The superficial femoral artery and two re-entry branches were ligated to induce ischemia in the calf region. Black bars mark ligations. Adapted with permission from Johanna Lähteenvuo © 2001. 4.2 GENE TRANSFER METHODS Human clinical grade first generation serotype 5 replication deficient (E1, partial E3-deletion) adenoviruses produced under GMP conditions in 293 cells were used as gene transfer vectors throughout the studies. All of the used viruses have the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter. The functionality of the viral constructs was tested in vitro before using them in animal experiments. 4.2.1 Intranodal and perinodal gene transfers (I-II) Intranodal gene transfer was performed under the capsule of the inguinal lymph node of pigs with a series of injections using a needle and a syringe (I, II) (Figure 8A). Perinodal gene transfer was conducted in a similar manner into the fat surrounding the lymph node (II) (Figure 8A). A total dose of 1 x 1011 viral particles (vp) encoding full-length VEGF-C, full-length VEGFD, or control gene β-galactosidase (LacZ) was injected per animal (I,II). In addition, a lower dose of 1 x 1010 vp encoding full-length VEGF-D was administered for a subset of animals (I). Gene transfer was performed immediately after the surgical excision of lymphatic vessels. 4.2.2 Intramuscular gene transfer (I, III) Intramuscular gene transfer was performed by manual injections into the hindlimb skeletal muscles of New Zealand White rabbits using a needle and a syringe (III). Adenoviruses encoding the stabilized forms of mouse HIF-1α and HIF-2α were used as therapeutic drugs, AdLacZ as a negative control virus, and AdVEGF-A as a positive control virus. A dose of 1 x 43 1011 vp was injected into the non-ischemic semimembranosus muscles, whereas in ischemic hindlimbs, a total dose of 3 x 1011 vp was administered to the whole hindlimb covering the semimembranosus, quadriceps femoris, abductor cruris cranialis and tibialis anterior muscles. Gene transfer into ischemic muscles was performed 1 day after the ischemia procedure. Intramuscular gene transfer was also performed on the right hind limbs (m. gastrocnemius) of C57/Bl/6J mice (I). The mice received a dose of 5 x 108 plaque-forming units (pfu) of AdVEGFC, AdVEGF-D, or AdLacZ. 4.2.3 Myocardial gene transfer (III) Adenoviruses encoding HIF-1α, HIF-2α, and LacZ were used for echocardiography-guided myocardial gene transfers in C57Bl/6J mice. Following induction of isoflurane inhalation anesthesia, 1 x1010 viral particles in a volume of 10 μL were injected into the anterior wall of of the left ventricle as described previously (Huusko et al. 2010, Springer et al. 2005). 4.3 X-RAY IMAGING X-ray radiography was used in all of the studies either to assess the growth of collecting lymphatic neovessels in pigs (I,II) or collateral artery formation in rabbits (III). 4.3.1 Lymphangiography (I-II) X-ray lymphangiographies were recorded with Siemens Siremobil 3000 C-arm (I) or Innova 3100 IQ Excellence X-ray machine (GE Healthcare) (II) from the inguinal region of pigs before and after the excision of lymphatics (Figure 9), and at the time of euthanasia. Lipiodol (Guerbet) served as a radio-opaque contrast agent. Lymphangiograms were used perioperatively to confirm that the lymphatic defect was of a standard width, as well as to evaluate the therapeutic effect of gene transfers after a predetermined follow-up period of 2 or 6 months. For this, the numbers of Lipiodol-positive lymphatic vessels connecting to and draining past the lymph node were quantified from still images and dynamic X-ray sequences (30 fps, frames per second). 4.3.2 Digital subtraction angiography (III) Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is a type of fluoroscopy technique that permits the visualization of vascular structures without superimposed bone and soft tissue densities. Images of blood vessels are produced by subtracting a pre-contrast image from subsequent images taken with contrast medium. In this thesis, DSA was used to visualize collateral blood vessel formation following gene transfer into ischemic rabbit hindlimbs. A 5 French catheter (Cordis) was introduced into the abdominal aorta of rabbits for the injection of contrast agent (Hexabrix, Guerbet). Serial DSA images (30 fps) were recorded immediately after the injection of contrast agent bolus with Innova 3100 IQ Excellence X-ray machine. Collateral vessel numbers and diameters were quantified from images with the best arterial filling. 44 Figure 9. Perioperative lymphangiograms before and after lymphatic vessel excision. Arrows mark excision sites and the asterisk shows the lymph node. Reprinted by permission from Ann Surg.: May 2013 - Volume 257(5) - p 961-967, Wolters Kluwer Health Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ©. 4.4 ULTRASOUND IMAGING Ultrasound imaging was used to evaluate the effects of gene transfer on mouse myocardium and rabbit skeletal muscle (III). Myocardial imaging was performed as described previously (Huusko et al. 2010) with a high-resolution imaging system (Vevo 770, VisualSonnics Inc) using a high-frequency ultrasound probe (RMV-707B) on the day of the GT and 6 days after GT. The determined parameters included ejection fraction (EF%) and left ventricle anterior wall thickness (LVAW; mm). Native Doppler ultrasound and contrast pulse sequence (CPS) imaging performed with Acuson Sequoia 512 (Siemens) were used to assess perfusion in gene-transduced hindlimb muscles of rabbits. CPS is a rather new ultrasound perfusion imaging technique associated with better spatial resolution and tissue penetration than previous perfusion imaging modalities, and has proven to provide an accurate evaluation of real-time perfusion in small laboratory animals (Rissanen et al. 2008, Phillips, Gardner 2004). A 0.5 mL bolus of SonoVue (Bracco) contrast microbubbles was administered via the ear vein and transversal images of semimembranosus muscles were captured immediately thereafter. Imaging was performed one day after ischemia procedure and six days after GT. Skeletal muscle perfusion was also measured during physical activity. In that assessment, the sciatic nerve was electrically stimulated for 6 minutes to induce maximal contraction in the calf muscles. Perfusion imaging was performed after the stimulation ceased. The signal intensities were quantified with DataPro software (version 2.13, Noesis). 4.5 31 P-MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY Phosphorus-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) is an established method for the assessment of metabolic correlates of tissue perfusion and was employed as a time-dependent, non-invasive measurement of changes in muscle metabolites, i.e. phosphocreatine (PCr) and inorganic phosphate (Pi), during rest, exercise and recovery from exercise (III) (Gowdak et al. 31 45 2000). At the beginning of exercise, hydrolyzed ATP is resynthesized from PCr breakdown. Thus, PCr decreases and Pi increases, while ATP levels remain constant (Figure 10). During recovery, PCr is restored and Pi levels normalize. (Prompers et al. 2006.) The ratio of PCr to Pi (PCr/(PCr+Pi)) can be used to assess the energy balance of the muscle (Korpisalo et al. 2008b). 31P-MRS was performed on ischemic rabbit skeletal muscles before GT and 6 days after GT with a UNITYINOVA imaging console (Varian) as described previously in detail (Korpisalo et al. 2008b). Physical activity in the muscles was achieved through stimulation of the sciatic nerve in a similar manner as during ultrasound imaging. Muscle recovery was followed for 12 minutes with 31P-MRS after the cessation of stimulation. The PCr/(PCr+Pi) ratios were calculated and used as a measure of aerobic capacity and recovery rate. Figure 10. Representative 31 P-MRS spectra of normoxic and ischemic muscles during rest, exercise and recovery. At rest, high PCr and ATP peaks are visible. During exercise, PCr decreases and Pi peaks. PCr reservoirs are then replenished during recovery. In ischemic muscles, the high Pi peak and low PCr during exercise indicate a shift towards anaerobic metabolism. Korpisalo et al., “Therapeutic angiogenesis with placental growth factor improves exercise tolerance of ischaemic rabbit hindlimbs”, Cardiovasc Res., 2008, 1;80(2):263-70, by permission of Oxford University Press. 46 4.6 VASCULAR PERMEABILITY AND TISSUE EDEMA 4.6.1 Seroma fluid evaluation (I-II) To evaluate the amount of seroma fluid that accumulated in the operated area of pigs following the excision of lymphatic vessels, an observer blinded to the study groups visually estimated the volume of fluid collection in deciliters every day for 2 weeks (I) or until the edema had dissipated (II). The seroma sacs were drained with a needle in case the volume was deemed harmful for the well-being of the animal. 4.6.2 Modified Miles Assay (I, III) Extravasation of plasma proteins and the leakiness of neovessels in rabbit transduced muscles were assessed by modified Miles Assay (III) (Rissanen et al. 2003a). Evans Blue (Sigma Aldrich) dye, which binds mostly to plasma albumin, was injected intravenously 30 minutes before sacrifice. Following sacrifice, the animals were perfusion fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde in citrate buffer (pH 3.5) to rinse off the remaining dye from the blood vessels. The extravasated dye from muscle samples was then eluted in formamide, after which it was quantified with a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 610 nm. Modified Miles Assay was also performed in C57/Bl/6J mice receiving a gene transfer of AdVEFG-C, AdVEGF-D, or AdLacZ to determine the effects of VEGF-C and VEGF-D on vascular permeability (I). 4.7 PROTEIN ANALYSES 4.7.1 Western Blot (I, III) Seroma fluid samples were collected from pigs 11 days after excision of lymphatics and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen (I). To assess the amount of VEGF-C and VEGF-D in seroma fluid, Western Blot protein expression analysis was performed with antibodies against VEGF-D (AF286, R&D Systems) and VEGF-C (AF-752, R&D Systems). Horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated Donkey anti-goat IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) served as a secondary antibody. The blots were scanned, and densitometric ratios of short isoforms of growth factors versus full-length isoforms were quantified with Adobe Photoshop CS4. AdHIF-1α and AdHIF-2α constructs were tested with Western Blot for their protein production in vitro prior to their usage in vivo (III). Monoclonal antibodies against HIF-1α (NB100-123, Novus Biologicals) and HIF-2α (NB100-132, Novus Biologicals) were used. 4.7.2 ELISA (I) The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to test the in vitro protein production of AdVEFG-C and AdVEGF-D. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were transduced with AdVEGF-C, AdVEGF-D or AdLacZ. Cell culture media were harvested 72 hours after transduction, and VEGF-C and VEGF-D protein levels were measured from these media with the appropriate ELISA kits (DVEC00 and DVED00, respectively, R&D Systems). 47 4.8 mRNA EXPRESSION Quantitative PCR was used to verify the expression of mouse HIF-1α and HIF-2α mRNA in transduced rabbit hindlimb muscle (III). Total RNA was extracted from snap-frozen muscle samples with an appropriate commercial kit (RNeasy Fibrous Tissue Midi Kit, #75742, Qiagen) and cDNA was synthetized from 2 μg of total RNA using random primers (Promega). Expression levels of HIF-1α and HIF-2α mRNA were measured with StepOnePlusTM Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Quantitative PCR was also used to examine the in vitro upregulation of HIF target genes VEGF-A and PDK1 (III). HUVECs were transduced with AdHIF-1α, AdHIF-2α, AdLacZ, or an empty adenovirus vector (AdCMV). Fortyeight hours after transduction, the cells were lysed in TriReagent (Invitrogen), RNA was isolated with chloroform, and cDNA was synthesized. VEGF-A and PDK1 mRNA levels were measured with StepOnePlusTM Real-Time PCR System. 4.9 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY AND HISTOLOGY Immunohistochemical stainings were used to evaluate lymphangiogenesis (I, II), angiogenesis (I, III), inflammatory cell numbers (I, II), and the expression of specific proteins (HIFs, VEGF-A, eNOS) (III). Hematoxylin-eosin stainings were used to characterize the tissue morphology (IIII). All the stainings were performed on sections cut from paraffin embedded tissues. The avidin-biotin HRP (horseradish peroxidase) system with diaminobenzidine (DAB; Vector Laboratories) and the alkaline phosphatase system with Vector Blue (Vector Laboratories) were used for signal detection. The antibodies used are listed in table 3 and the protocols are described or referenced in the original publications. 48 Table 3. Antibodies used in immunohistochemistry Antibody Structure stained Dilution Pretreatment Manufacturer Study PECAM-1 endothelium (pig) 1:100 - R&D Systems I CD31 endothelium (rabbit) 1:50 - DAKO III Griffonia simplicifolia lectin I endothelium (mouse) 1:100 - Vector Laboratories III α-SMA smooth muscle cells, pericytes 1:250 - Sigma Aldrich I LYVE-1 lymphatic endothelium 1:100 - R&D Systems I PROX-1 lymphatic endothelium 1:100 Citrate buffer boiling, TSA R&D Systems I VEGFR-3 lymphatic endothelium 1:100 Citrate buffer boiling non-commercial (Jussila et al. 1998) II CD3 T cells 1:25 Target Retrieval Solution (DAKO) DAKO I, II CD20cy B cells 1:200 Target Retrieval Solution (DAKO) DAKO I, II CD23 Dendritic cells 1:10 Target Retrieval Solution (DAKO) DAKO I, II HAM56 Macrophages 1:100 - DAKO II HIF-1α HIF-1α 1:250 - Novus Biologicals III HIF-2α HIF-2α 1:250 - Novus Biologicals III VEGF-A VEGF-A 1:250 - Santa Cruz Biotechnology III eNOS eNOS 1:50 - BD BioSciences III TSA = tyramide signal amplification To evaluate lymphatic and blood vessel growth from the immunostainings, mean capillary/vessel areas (μm2), capillary/vessel perimeters (μm), and numbers of capillaries/vessels were quantified with AnalySIS software (Soft Imaging System) from the microscopic images (Olympus AX-70) of VEGFR-3-, PROX-1 + α-SMA-, PECAM-1 + α-SMA-, CD31- and lectin-stained sections (I-III). In addition, the numbers of inflammatory cells inside the lymph nodes were counted from sections stained for B cells, T cells, dendritic cells (I, II) and macrophages (II). The stage of lymph node atrophy following disruption of lymph flow to the node was evaluated from the hematoxylin-eosin stained specimens (I, II). 49 4.10 ASSESSMENT OF LYMPHATIC FUNCTION The functionality of the lymphatic neovessels was evaluated from Lipiodol X-ray lymphangiograms as described in chapter 4.3.1 (I, II) and by an adaptation of the modified Miles assay (I). In the modified version of the assay, a mix of Patent Blue and Evans Blue dyes was injected distally into the pig hindlimb and serum samples were collected 13 minutes after the injection. The marker dyes were then eluted from the serum in formamide, and their amounts quantified with a spectrophotometer. The assay is based on the expectation that the lymphatic neovasculature in the operated area will collect the dye and transport it to the systemic circulation. Thus, the more dye there is in the collected serum samples, the better is the lymph flow in the operated area. 4.11 STATISTICAL ANALYSES Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) (I, II) or means ± standard error of mean (SEM) (III) for normally distributed data, and medians with interquartile ranges for nonnormally distributed data (II). The normality of distribution was assessed visually by plotting data from individual experiments to a quantile (Q-Q) plot and residuals of data to a histogram. Data estimated to approximately follow normal distribution were tested using parametric tests. The independent-samples Student’s t-test was used when comparing only two groups against each other. For comparing multiple groups, the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, and in the case of a statistical significance, followed by Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test or Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test, or pairwise comparison and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures with Bonferroni’s post hoc test was used when comparing multiple groups with two independent variables. In case of non-normally distributed data, the nonparametric analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis) was performed, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test for pairwise comparison and the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing. Linear mixed-effect models were used to analyze group differences at baseline and during follow-up in the evaluation of seroma fluid accumulation (I, II). Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate was used to adjust results for multiple comparisons. Throughout, corrected p-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. 50 51 5 Results 5.1 THERAPEUTIC LYMPHANGIOGENESIS FOR LYMPHEDEMA (I) Therapeutic lymphangiogenesis in the form of adenoviral VEGF-C and VEGF-D gene transfers was studied in a novel pig model of lymphedema. The inguinal lymphatic vascular network was destroyed and adenovirally over-expressed therapeutic genes were administered into the lymph node with an intact vascular pedicle simulating microvascular anastomosis of transferred lymph nodes. AdLacZ served as control. 5.1.1 Lymphatic vessel regrowth induced by AdVEGF-C and AdVEGF-D The numbers of collecting lymphatic vessels detectable by Lipiodol x-ray lymphangiography were counted 2 months after lymphatic vessel excision and gene transfer. Both AdVEGF-C and AdVEGF-D induced a statistically significant increase in the number of functional lymphatic vessels spanning the operated area as compared to the AdLacZ control group (Figure 11A). Most of the lymphatic neovessels were connected to the lymph node, although vessels bypassing the node were also detected in many animals regardless of the given treatment. Prominent lymphatic vessel growth following AdVEGF-C and AdVEGF-D GT was observed in lymph node tissue sections stained for LYVE-1 (lymphatic capillaries) (Figure 11B-D). Dense LYVE-1 positive lymphatic capillary networks were concentrated around the pericapsular area in AdVEGF-C-treated pigs, and in the connective tissue surrounding the lymph node in AdVEGF-D treated pigs. The numbers of PROX-1 + α-SMA positive vessels (collecting lymphatic vessels) were higher in both the AdVEGF-C (157 ± 41, P < 0.01) and AdVEGF-D groups (134 ± 36, p < 0.05) than in the AdLacZ group (75 ± 22). As a consequence of the reconstituted lymphatic connections to the lymph node, the lymph node structure, as evaluated from the hematoxylin-eosin staining, was better preserved in the AdVEGF-C and AdVEGF-D groups than in the control group (Figure 11E). Hematoxylin-eosin staining of the lymph nodes revealed that the normal follicular structure was retained in most of the AdVEGF-C and AdVEGF-D transduced lymph nodes, whereas control lymph nodes had been more often infiltrated with adipose and connective tissue, as well as groups of lymphocytes and siderophages detected mainly around vessels (Figure 11F-H). 52 Figure 11. A, The numbers of lymphatic vessels in the inguinal area 2 months after the procedure as counted from Lipiodol lymphangiograms. B-D, LYVE-1 immunostaining revealing robust lymphangiogenesis characterized by dilated sinuses in the AdVEGF-C-treated lymph nodes and more discrete lymphangiogenesis in the AdVEGF-D-treated lymph nodes. E, Quantification of the amount of connective and adipose tissue in the lymph node sections. F-H, Hematoxylin-eosin staining of the lymph nodes. The asterisk in G points to the slight deterioration of the nodal tissue, and the asterisks in H point to the grouped lymphocytes and siderophages. Magnifications: B,C,D,F,G: 12,5X; H: 100X. ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001. 5.1.2 Lymphatic transport 2 months after AdVEGF-C and AdVEGF-D treatment The lymphatic neovessels detected by lymphangiography mainly in the AdVEGF-C- and AdVEGF-D-treated animals carried Lipiodol contrast agent in a distal-to-proximal direction, thus indicating restored lymphatic flow in the operated area (Figure 12A-C). To further assess improvement in lymph transport across the damaged area, the accumulation of Evans Blue + Patent Blue dye mix in the systemic blood following distal injection of the dyes was quantified. AdVEGF-C and AdVEGF-D increased dye transport into the systemic circulation by 50% and 40%, respectively, as compared to AdLacZ controls (Figure 12D). Figure 12. A-C, Lipiodol lymphangiograms of the inguinal area 2 months after operation with arrowheads pointing to lymphatic neovessels and asterisks marking the lymph nodes. D, Quantification of the accumulated Patent Blue + Evans Blue dyes in the systemic blood after a dye mix injection distal to the lymphatic excision site. *** = p < 0.001. 53 5.1.3 Increased seroma formation following AdVEGF-D gene transfer The surgical excision of lymphatic vessels led to an immediate accumulation of seroma fluid in the inguinal ring area. During follow-up, the volume of seroma was visually estimated by an observer blinded to the study groups. The amounts of seroma in each treatment group increased at a similar rate for the first 6 days after the surgical procedure (Figure 13A). On the 7th day postoperation, the curve depicting the volume of seroma in the AdVEGF-D treatment group started to diverge upwards from those of the AdVEGF-C and the AdLacZ groups. Seroma fluid volumes in the AdVEGF-D-treated animals continued to rise for the remainder of the 2-week follow-up period, whereas fluid volumes in AdVEGF-C and AdLacZ groups remained low and at comparable levels. Furthermore, AdVEGF-D-treated animals required drainage of excessive fluid due to animal welfare considerations, whereas spontaneous dissipation of seroma without the need for drainage was observed in the other two groups by two weeks after the procedure. In an attempt to clarify the causes of the dissimilar seroma fluid buildup between groups, a few possible explanations were explored. First, the adenoviral constructs were tested for their protein production in HUVEC cells. ELISA analysis of the cell culture media revealed negligible differences in protein expression between constructs (Figure 13B). Next, a new set of pigs receiving a 10-fold lower dose (1 x 1010 vp) of AdVEGF-D was operated to study whether a lower viral dose would reduce seroma formation. However, a similar trend in the seroma fluid accumulation was observed as previously with a higher dose of AdVEGF-D (Figure 13A). Finally, the proteolytic processing of the administered growth factors was examined in order to determine whether angiogenesis and increased vascular permeability known to be induced by the processed short forms could be involved in the fluid buildup. For this, a Western Blot analysis of collected seroma samples was performed. It was observed that AdVEGF-D animals displayed high levels of proteolytically processed human VEGF-D, whereas AdVEGF-C animals had only small amounts of processed VEGF-C in their seroma (Figure 13C). A subsequent densitometric analysis from the Western Blots showed significantly higher ratios of processed versus full-length forms of VEGF-D (0.53 ± 0.11) than VEGF-C (0.30 ± 0.025) in the AdVEGF-D and AdVEGF-C transduced animals, respectively, implying that there had been increased processing of VEGF-D into its shorter isoform (p = 0.03). To investigate potential angiogenic effects of the short isoform of VEGF-D that was found to be present in significant amounts in seroma fluid, lymph node sections were immunostained for PECAM-1 + α-SMA marking blood capillaries. There was a two-fold increase in mean capillary area in AdVEGF-D-treated nodes in comparison to AdLacZ controls (p < 0.05). Furthermore, a modified Miles assay performed in C57/Bl/6J mice revealed an almost 9-fold increase in the vascular permeability in AdVEGF-D transduced mouse hindlimbs as compared to mice receiving AdLacZ (p < 0.001). Extravasation was 3.5-fold higher but not statistically significantly higher in AdVEGF-C-treated mice than in control mice. 54 Figure 13. A, Seroma fluid buildup as a function of time. For both AdVEGF-D groups vs. AdLacZ p < 0.001. ‘Dr’ marks drainage in AdVEGF-D higher dose group on postoperative day 11 and 13, and in AdVEGF-D lower dose group on postoperative day 11. B, ELISA analysis of the in vitro protein production of AdVEGF-C and AdVEGF-D constructs. C, Western Blot analysis of VEGF-C and VEGF-D proteins in seroma fluid. Upper band represents the full-length form and the lower band is the processed short form, P = positive control, L = LacZ, C = VEGF-C, D = VEGF-D. 5.1.4 Histopathological evaluation of safety samples Hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections of the collected safety samples (heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, gonads) were examined by a pathologist. No signs of pathological changes were observed in these organs in either of the treatment groups or in the control group when examined two months after the procedure. 5.2 OPTIMIZING ADVEGF-C THERAPY FOR LYMPHEDEMA (II) Adenoviral VEGF-C gene transfer was established as a promising lymphangiogenic agent in the first study and was therefore selected for further evaluation and optimization of delivery in the same pig model of lymphedema as used previously. AdVEGF-C gene transfer under the capsule of the lymph node was compared to gene transfer into the fat surrounding the lymph node in terms of efficacy and injurious effects. Control animals received injections of AdLacZ or saline. 5.2.1 Lymphatic neovessel growth induced by intranodal and perinodal AdVEGF-C Lymphatic vessel regrowth in the operated area two months after GT was evaluated from lymphangiograms recorded with a new Innova 3100 IQ Excellence X-ray machine with superior resolution than that used in the earlier experiment. Dense lymphatic networks and perfused lymph nodes were observed in animals treated with AdVEGF-C regardless of whether GT was 55 performed intranodally or perinodally (Figure 14A and C). In control pigs, markedly fewer functional vessels were observable, although some isolated lymphatic vessels also spanned the damaged area in those animals (Figure 14B, D and E). Lymphangiograms taken from four animals at six months after the procedure revealed similar differences in lymphatic vessel growth between pigs receiving either intranodal AdVEGF-C or intranodal AdLacZ (Figure 14F and G). However, no quantitative comparison could be made at the 6-month timepoint due to the small number of animals. Figure 14. Lymphangiogenic effects of intranodally and perinodally administered AdVEGF-C versus control groups as illustrated by lymphangiograms taken two (A-E) and six (F-G) months after operation and GT. Perfused lymph nodes (asterisk) can be seen in the AdVEGF-C-treated animals. Scale bars = 10 mm. Lymphatic vessels connected to and bypassing the lymph node were counted from the twomonth-timepoint lymphangiograms. The total number of lymphatic vessels and the number of lymph node-connected vessels were higher in the intranodal and perinodal AdVEGF-C groups than in their respective AdLacZ control groups and saline control group (Figure 15). Some lymphatic vessels bypassing the node were observed in most animals but their numbers did not differ significantly between the groups. 56 Figure 15. Quantification of lymphatic vessels from the lymphangiograms two months after the procedure. *** = p < 0.001, ** = p < 0.01, * = p < 0.05, ns = non-significant. Lymphangiogenic effects of AdVEGF-C were further examined at the microscopic level from VEGFR-3 immunostained sections of lymph nodes and adjacent tissues (Figure 16). Perinodal AdVEGF-C gene transfer induced lymphangiogenesis most prominently in the pericapsular area and in the connective tissue surrounding the lymph node, whereas intranodal AdVEGF-C appeared to stimulate lymphatic capillary growth also inside the lymph node with capillary clusters replacing small areas of normal follicular structure. VEGFR-3 positive lymphatic vessel lumens in both AdVEGF-C groups were significantly larger than in their respective control groups (intranodal VEGF-C vs. intranodal LacZ: p < 0.001; perinodal VEGF-C vs. perinodal LacZ: p = 0.001). Figure 16. Robust lymphangiogenic effect in the connective tissue surrounding the lymph node in AdVEGF-C-treated animals as visualized Magnification: 100X, scale bars: 100 μm. by immunohistochemical staining for VEGFR-3. 57 5.2.2 Effects of intranodal and perinodal AdVEGF-C on lymph node preservation and seroma formation Lymph nodes were excised and measured in three dimensions after euthanizing the animals two months after the procedure. The lymph node sizes in the intranodal LacZ group (12 ± 6 cm3, p = 0.009), the perinodal LacZ group (14 ± 7 cm3, p = 0.003), and the saline control group (12 ± 5 cm3, p < 0.001) were smaller than the nonoperated lymph nodes of the left limb (24 ± 8 cm 3). Lymph nodes receiving either intranodal (30 ± 7 cm3) or perinodal AdVEGF-C (28 ± 12 cm3) retained their original size and exhibited no statistical difference to the intact left side lymph nodes. Lymph node structure was examined from hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections and atrophy was given a grade between 0 and 4, with 0 representing an intact lymph node structure and 4 representing extensive atrophy. The median values with interquartile ranges for different groups were as follows: intranodal AdVEGF-C 1.0 (0.0 - 2.0), perinodal AdVEGF-C 1.0 (1.0 1.5), and NaCl control 3.0 (2.0 - 4.0). In general, local decreases in cellularity and minor fibrofatty formations were observed in AdVEGF-C-treated lymph nodes, whereas confluent areas of fibro-fatty tissue were found in NaCl control nodes (Figure 17). Seroma formation during follow-up was evaluated in a similar manner as in Study I. Despite differences in volumes between study groups at certain time points, the overall seroma volumes did not differ statistically between groups (p = 0.062). Figure 17. Hematoxylin-eosin staining of the lymph nodes. Asterisks mark atrophied areas. Magnification: 12.5X, scale bars: 100 μm. 5.2.3 Macrophage accumulation inside the lymph node following intranodal GT HAM56-antibody was used to label macrophages inside the lymph nodes. Clusters of tingible body macrophages were observed in the germinal centers of the intranodally injected lymph nodes, whereas fewer macrophages were found lining the subcapsular and trabecular sinuses of lymph nodes receiving perinodal GT or saline injections (Figure 18). There were 2.3-fold more HAM56-positive cells present in the intranodal AdVEGF-C-treated lymph nodes than in the perinodal AdVEGF-C-treated lymph nodes (p < 0.05), and 2.7-fold more in the lymph nodes receiving intranodal AdLacZ than in the lymph nodes receiving perinodal AdLacZ (p < 0.01). No treatment-related differences were observed in the numbers of B cells, T cells and dendritic cells inside the lymph node. 58 Figure 18. Immunohistochemical staining for the macrophage marker HAM56 showing intense accumulation of macrophages in the germinal centers of lymph nodes following intranodal administration of AdVEGF-C. Arrowheads point out HAM56-positive cells. Magnifications: 12,5X for large images, 200X for insets. Scale bars: 100 μm for bigger images, 10 μm for insets. 5.3 THERAPEUTIC ANGIOGENESIS VIA OVER-EXPRESSION OF HIFS (III) The effects of transcription factors HIF-1α and HIF-2α on angiogenesis and muscle energy metabolism were studied in normoxic and ischemic rabbit hindlimbs, as well as in normoxic mouse myocardium. Gene transfer was performed by intramuscular injections. The effects of adenoviral delivery of HIFs were evaluated 6 days after GT. AdVEGF-A served as a positive control and AdLacZ as a negative control. 5.3.1 Angiogenic response following AdHIF-1α and AdHIF-2α GTs Both AdHIF-1α and AdHIF-2α induced enlargement of blood capillaries in rabbit skeletal muscles and mouse myocardium, as evidenced by the immunostainings for CD31 and Griffonia simplicifolia lectin (Figure 19A-H). The increase in capillary size evoked by AdHIF-1α and AdHIF-2α was approximately four-fold in normoxic rabbit hindlimbs and two-fold in normoxic mouse myocardium as compared to AdLacZ. AdVEGF-A induced a much more robust enlargement of the capillaries, which, on the downside, led to substantial tissue edema and vascular leakage that were not associated with AdHIFs. Vascular leakage, as evaluated with the modified Miles assay, was 35-fold (p = 0.006) greater in the AdVEGF-A transduced muscles than in the intact control muscles. Native Doppler and CPS imaging were used to quantify perfusion of the transduced normoxic hindlimb muscles at rest (Figure 19I-P). Perfusion measurements revealed a 2- to 5fold increase in AdHIF-1α/-2α transduced muscles 6 days after GT compared to AdLacZ. AdVEGF-A transduced muscles showed an 18- and 34-fold higher perfusion than controls, as determined from CPS and Doppler images, respectively. In ischemic muscles, AdHIF-2α but not AdHIF-1α, statistically significantly improved perfusion after physical activity from day 0 to day 6, as quantified from CPS images. Digital subtraction angiography was used to assess collateral artery formation in ischemic hindlimbs. AdHIF-1α and AdHIF-2α increased the number of opened collateral vessels as compared to AdLacZ, albeit not statistically significantly. The mean diameters of collateral vessels were similar between all groups. . 59 Figure 19. Effects of AdHIFs and AdVEGF-A on normoxic rabbit skeletal muscles and normoxic mouse myocardium. A-D, CD31 staining demonstrating notably enlarged capillaries in AdVEGF-A transduced rabbit skeletal muscle and moderate enlargement of capillaries following AdHIF-1α and AdHIF-2α GTs. E-H, Similar pattern of capillary enlargement evident in the lectin-stained mouse myocardium. I-L, Native Doppler imaging showing blood flow in large vessels of the m. semimembranosus. M-P, CPS imaging demonstrating muscle perfusion at the capillary level. Asterisks in J and N point to increased tissue edema between m. gracilis and m. semimembranosus after AdVEGF-A GT. The effects of AdHIFs on cardiac function in mice were evaluated by ultrasound imaging. AdHIF-2α maintained cardiac function at the basal level, as concluded from ejection fraction percentages (Figure 20). A decrease in this parameter was observed after AdHIF-1α and AdLacZ GT. In contrast, AdHIF-1α was associated with an increased thickness of the left ventricle anterior wall at diastole. 60 Figure 20. Parameters depicting left ventricle function in mice before and 6 days after GT. EF% = ejection fraction, LVAW;d = left ventricle anterior wall thickness. * = p < 0.05, *** = p < 0.001. 5.3.2 Effects of AdHIFs on muscle energy metabolism In addition to the angiogenic response, the effects of HIFs on skeletal muscle metabolism were also a major subject of interest. 31P-MRS was used to measure energy metabolism in the ischemic hindlimbs of rabbits. Aerobic capacity, as depicted by the ratio PCr/(PCr+Pi) at the end of the exercise period, declined in all the study groups (Figure 21). At d0, only intact muscles were able to properly recover from exercise and restore PCr, while the PCr/(PCr + Pi) ratios in the ischemic muscles remained at low and comparable levels during the course of recovery. Six days after GT, AdHIF-1α transduced muscles replenished PCr storage markedly better than AdLacZ transduced muscles. By d6, recovery of AdHIF-2α transduced muscles from exercise had returned back to baseline but did not significantly differ from the recovery of AdLacZ muscles. Figure 21. PCr/(PCr+Pi) ratios representing aerobic capacity and recovery rate one day after the ischemia procedure (d0) and six days after gene transfer (d6). AdHIF-1α improved recovery of ischemic muscles from exercise 6 days after GT. 5.3.3 Upregulation of HIF target genes following AdHIF-1α and AdHIF-2α GTs At protein level, VEGF-A was detectable in immunohistochemically stained sections of AdHIF1α and AdHIF-2α transduced muscles, whereas AdLacZ muscles expressed no VEGF-A. Moreover, eNOS was markedly upregulated in AdHIF-2α transduced muscles and to a lesser extent also in AdHIF-1α muscles. At the mRNA level in vitro, AdHIF-1α upregulated PDK1 more vigorously than AdHIF-2α. In contrast, VEGF-A mRNA expression in ECs was higher after transduction with AdHIF-2α than with AdHIF-1. 61 6 Discussion 6.1 LYMPHANGIOGENIC GENE THERAPY FOR LYMPHEDEMA (I-II) Secondary lymphedema remains a common clinical challenge after oncologic surgery and radiation therapy in the industrialized countries. Breast cancer as well as melanoma of the extremities are good examples of high prevalence tumors with a tendency to develop lymphatic metastasis (Scoggings et al. 2005). Removal or irradiation of draining lymph nodes is a key prognostic factor when treating these malignancies (Chang et al. 2013). Alas, such treatments often lead to seconday lymphedema. A recent meta-analysis revealed that approximately one in five women with breast cancer will develop lymphedema (DiSipio et al. 2013). Autologous lymph node transfer, which is intended to rebuild the normal lymphatic vascular anatomy and function after cancer treatment, represents as a promising novel approach to treat this condition that has no curative treatment at present (Saaristo et al. 2012, Becker et al. 2006). A shortcoming of this approach is a prerequisite that lymphatic anastomoses form spontaneously and incorporate the transferred lymph node flap into the existing lymphatic vasculature at the lymphedema-subjected area. Lymph nodes left without lymphatic vasculature are known to regress, necessitating the formation of lymphatic connections between the transplant and the recipient site for successful result of the treatment (Mebius et al. 1991). In this thesis, a gene therapeutic approach was adopted to promote integration of the lymph node graft and restore damaged lymphatic function. A novel large animal model of lymphedema was developed to better mimick the features of the human lymphatic circulation, the most important features being the similar hydrostatic conditions and lymphatic vessel dimensions shared by humans and pigs. Previous studies of therapeutic lymphangiogenesis have been mostly performed using rodent lymphedema models, where the regenerating lymphatics only need to grow over an area measurable in millimeters to repair the damage in lymphatic network (Tammela et al. 2007, Yoon et al. 2003, Szuba et al. 2002, Saaristo et al. 2002a, Karkkainen et al. 2001). In the pig model used in this thesis, lymphatic neovessels need to span a length of 5 centimeters if they are to form anastomoses with the distal and proximal ends of the existing lymphatic vascular tree. Although some spontaneously growing lymphatic vessels of this magnitude were detected in control animals, the stimulation of lymphatic growth with adenoviral VEGF-C and VEGF-D proved to be effective in inducing robust growth of functional collecting lymphatic vessels to the site of surgical damage. These lymphatic neovessels were still observable after a two-month follow-up, even though the adenoviral over-expression of delivered growth factors lasts for only up to two weeks. Hence, long-term growth factor expression may not be required to achieve a maintained therapeutic effect. Importantly, the newly formed lymphatic vessels were also found to improve lymphatic flow in the damaged area. It seems likely that due to the successful integration of the lymphatic neovessels into the preexisting lymphatic network and consequential improvement in lymphatic flow, the lymph node size and histological architecture were best preserved in those animals transduced with AdVEGF-C and almost as well in animals receiving AdVEGF-D. Animals receiving control gene AdLacZ or saline displayed smaller lymph nodes than those in the therapeutic treatment groups, with fibro-fatty formations replacing parts of the normal follicular structure. Due to immune cell trafficking through the lymph node, the preservation of histological architecture is crucial to its function. The use of Lipiodol as a radio-opaque contrast agent in this thesis may have affected the size measurements and histology evaluations, as Lipiodol has been shown to influence lymph node size and to be retained in lymph nodes for 12 months on average (McIvor 62 1980). This might explain why the AdVEGF-C-treated lymph nodes were slightly, albeit not statistically significantly, larger than the intact left-side lymph nodes not perfused with Lipiodol. However, all the operated right-side lymph nodes were imaged using Lipiodol in a similar manner and treatment-related differences in size and histology were observed, warranting the conclusion that growth factor treatment may enhance the prognosis of the transferred lymph nodes. Despite offering a platform to study therapeutic interventions for lymphedema with an adequate scale, the pig model developed in this thesis possessed its own limitations. Unlike in chronic lymphedema, this model is based on acute lymphatic damage in otherwise young and healthy animals. In the clinical situation, lymphedema occurs mostly in older patients, where the initial accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the subcutaneous tissue is often complicated by fibrosis, increased lipid deposition, inflammation and attenuated immune responses (Rockson 2001). No such changes were observed in the present model, as seroma fluid naturally dissipated within a few weeks after lymphatic excision even in the control groups. It would be preferable to develop a model of chronic lymphedema when investigating the potential of adenoviral growth factor therapy in severe states of the disease. However, autologous lymph node transfer can easily be performed in combination with breast reconstruction surgery 1 - 2 years after oncological treatments of breast cancer without the need for a separate operation (Viitanen et al. 2013). At this stage, the secondary changes of lymphedema have not occurred yet and the patients are likely to benefit most from lymph node transfer. From this perspective, the pig model of acute lymphatic damage investigated in this thesis serves its purpose as a proof-of-concept model to test the efficacy of lymph node transfer in combination with lymphangiogenic gene therapy before conducting clinical trials. Intriguingly, despite possessing similar lymphangiogenic effects, AdVEGF-D appeared to provoke more blood vascular effects than AdVEGF-C. Blood capillaries were more dilated, their permeability increased, and seroma volumes were greater after application of AdVEGF-D in comparison to AdVEGF-C and control. Proteolytically processed short forms of VEGF-C and VEGF-D are known to bind with high affinity to VEGFR-2, and these forms can induce angiogenesis and vessel hyperpermeability (Anisimov et al. 2009, McColl et al. 2007, Achen et al. 1998, Joukov et al. 1997). The short isoform of VEGF-D, VEGF-DΔNΔC, has been linked to an increase in pericardial effusion when injected into the heart at high doses, as well as in notable vascular permeability and subsequent edema in transduced hindlimbs (Rutanen et al. 2004, Rissanen et al. 2003b). Thus, hyperpermeability of angiogenic vessels induced by VEGF-DΔNΔC could account for the observed increase in seroma fluid in the AdVEGF-D group, at least to some extent. Western Blot analysis of seroma fluids provided evidence of more extensive processing of the full-length VEGF-D protein into its short isoform in comparison to VEGF-C, indicating that there were substantial amounts of VEGF-DΔNΔC present in the seroma fluid. However, in the Western Blot analysis, human antibodies were used to detect VEGF-C and VEGF-D proteins, and even though these had originated from human transgenes, they had been processed into their short isoforms by endogenous porcine proteases. There is no certainty that the recognizion of these processed isoforms by human antibodies was complete. Another possible factor interfering with the accuracy of this assay could be cross-reactivity between human-origin short isoforms and endogenous porcine short isoforms. VEGF-C was selected for further study due to its slightly superior lymphangiogenic and lesser angiogenic effects than VEGF-D. Using the same pig model of lymphedema, AdVEGF-C was injected under the capsule of the lymph node similarly as in the first study, or into the fat surrounding the node, with the objective to determine the efficacy and potential adverse effects of both administration routes. Perinodally administered AdVEGF-C proved to be as effective in inducing growth of new lymphatic vessels as intranodally injected AdVEGF-C. The architecture as well as the size of lymph nodes were equally well preserved in both treatment groups. However, gene transfer into the perinodal fat appeared to be gentler to the grafted lymph node. Pigs receiving intranodal injections of AdVEGF-C displayed increased macrophage infiltration 63 inside the lymph node two months after gene transfer. Since a similar increase in the numbers of macrophages was also observed in animals receiving intranodal AdLacZ, it would appear that the macrophage accumulation was due to the adenoviral vector or mechanical damage caused by the injections. However, this result should be viewed with caution since the HAM56 antibody used here to identify macrophages labels ECs as well, which may hamper the reliable quantification of the pure macrophage population (Gown, Tsukada & Ross 1986). The adenovirus vector per se has been associated with a prominent inflammatory reaction, but the innate inflammatory response mediated by macrophages against the adenovirus would be expected to have subsided two months after vector administration (Schnell et al. 2001, Zhang et al. 2001, Worgall et al. 1997, Simon et al. 1993). One possible explanation for the increased macrophage number at the site of vector distribution could be that the high local concentrations of the adenoviral vector inside the lymph node had elicited cytotoxicity, leading to loss of transduced cells, which would then be removed by macrophages. High doses of the adenoviral vector are known to cause cytotoxicity of the target cells and chronic inflammation, at least in neuronal tissue (Thomas et al. 2001). Moreover, macrophages have been shown to phagocytose adenovirus vector-transduced cells in mouse brain (Zirger et al. 2012). Phagocytosis marks a late stage in the process of transduced cell death. In general, local administrations of reasonable doses (109 - 1011 vp) of the adenoviral vector have been claimed to be well tolerated (Harvey et al. 2002). In the perinodally treated lymph nodes, sparse macrophages lined the subcapsular and trabecular sinuses and no such clustering was observed as in the intranodally treated lymph nodes. These findings favor the administration of AdVEGF-C into the perinodal fat of the lymph node graft. One important aspect when one considers future clinical trials is the ability of lymphatic growth factors to promote lymphatic metastasis of tumor cells, even spontaneous tumor formation (Karkkainen et al. 2009, Hirakawa et al. 2007, Ishii et al. 2004, Skobe et al. 2001). It is possible that the viral construct or the protein product could diffuse from the injection site to other organs and cause undesirable side effects. Although the safety samples collected from internal organs in the first study of this thesis showed no signs of pathological changes, the toxicity of AdVEGF-C will need to be more comprehensively evaluated in a separate study prior to clinical testing. Patient safety is a key issue when identifying recipients for this treatment in clinical trials. However, VEGF-C, which is constantly produced by normal human lymph nodes in small amounts, was only transiently (~ 1 week) over-expressed in the treatment strategy explored in this thesis. Nonetheless, the risks and benefits of combined lymph node transfer and AdVEGF-C over-expression will need to be carefully weighed especially in patients with a history of malignant disease. Lymph node transfer in itself may provide added benefit for these patients in their battle against cancer recurrence, since grafted lymph nodes have been shown to maintain the ability to trap tumor cells and mount a cytotoxic immune response against cancer cells (Tammela et al. 2007, Rabson et al. 1982). The ultimate selection of the growth factor to be taken into clinical testing requires a thorough examination of the advantages and disadvantages of each candidate. VEGF-C was proven to be the preferred growth factor over VEGF-D in this thesis. In addition to these two contenders, an engineered variant of VEGF-C (VEGF-C156S) exists, which is a selective agonist of VEGFR-3 and believed to induce only lymphangiogenesis without any angiogenic effects. Nonetheless, this growth factor exhibited inferior lymphangiogenic potential compared to VEGF-C in a recent study conducted in the same pig model of lymphedema as employed in this thesis (Visuri et al., unpublished results). A similar observation was also made in a mouse model of lymphedema and lymph node transfer (Tervala et al. 2015). Based on these findings and the results obtained in this thesis, VEGF-C can be considered to represent the primary candidate for lymphangiogenic gene therapy trials due to its superior lymphangiogenic efficacy and negligible vascular effects as compared to VEGF-D. A summary of the effects of these growth factors observed in this thesis is presented in figure 22. 64 Figure 22. A summary of the effects of VEGF-C and VEGF-D on blood and lymphatic vasculature observed in this thesis. 6.2 PHYSIOLOGICAL ANGIOGENESIS INDUCED BY HIFS (III) The aim of the third study of this thesis was to examine the activation of several factors involved in angiogenesis via AdHIFs in order to achieve a more physiologigal angiogenic response than could be achieved by over-expressing a single proangiogenic factor. VEGF-A, for example, is known to induce robust angiogenesis, which is unfortunately accompanied by side effects such as notable tissue edema and the formation of immature, leaky vascular structures (Karvinen et al. 2011, Weis, Cheresh 2005). Hypoxia-inducible factors function as master regulators of angiogenesis and vascular remodeling by coordinately regulating the expression of several downstream target genes that play key roles in mediating vascular responses to ischemia (Semenza 2014). Thus, it has been hypothesized that gene transfer of these transcription factors may lead to more physiological angiogenesis by turning on several genes simultaneously. The effects of AdHIF-1α and AdHIF-2α gene transfers on angiogenesis were studied in normoxic mouse myocardium as well as in normoxic and ischemic rabbit skeletal muscles. The use of stabilized forms of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in viral constructs decreased their normal proteolytic degradation under normoxic conditions. Indeed, both AdHIFs induced capillary enlargement in all target tissues when they were assessed under the miscroscope; this effect was moderate compared to the effect of AdVEGF-A. The capillaries appeared to have a uniform shape after AdHIF-1α/-2α GTs in contrast to the disorganized and greatly enlarged capillaries induced by AdVEGF-A. Tissue edema, which commonly accompanies severe capillary 65 dilatation, was markedly evident in AdVEGF-A transduced muscles, whereas no harmful edema was observed after AdHIF-1α and AdHIF-2α gene transfers. Taken together, these findings support the working hypothesis that HIFs lead to more physiological angiogenesis than VEGF-A on its own. Additionally, AdHIFs appeared to enhance collateral vessel opening in comparison to AdLacZ as determined by DSA in ischemic rabbit hindlimbs. Perfusion measurements by ultrasound imaging techniques were performed with the objective to answer the question of whether the angiogenic effect induced by HIFs would be adequate to improve muscle circulation at rest and, furthermore, to improve perfusion recovery after exercise. Perfusion at rest 6 days after GT was approximately 4-fold higher in the AdHIF treatment groups than in controls, and even several-fold higher than that in the AdVEGF-A transduced muscles, which is in accordance with the histological capillary measurements. Contrast pulse imaging (CPS), which was used here to quantify perfusion, has been shown to be more accurate at the capillary level than the traditional native Doppler technique, which revealed no significant difference in perfusion between AdHIFs and negative control in this study (Rissanen et al. 2008). Interestingly, AdHIF-2α but not AdHIF-1α resulted in enhanced perfusion recovery from exercise in ischemic limbs from day 0 to day 6 after GT, as quantified by CPS. This study was the first to report improved blood flow by HIF-2α in large animal skeletal muscle. AdHIF-2α also appeared to exert cardioprotective effects in the mouse myocardium. The contractility of the left ventricle was maintained at the basal level 6 days after GT in AdHIF-2α transduced mice hearts, whereas a decrease in the ejection fraction was observed in AdHIF-1α and AdLacZ transduced hearts. The reduced cardiac function in these groups may have been attributable to the gene transfer procedure itself possibly inflicting mechanical damage to the tiny hearts of mice, as well as the inflammation and edema caused by the adenoviral vector (Merentie et al., unpublished results). These interfering factors, tissue damage and inflammation, may also hamper reliable quantification of cardiac function, which will warrant further confirmation of the observation that AdHIF-2α could protect the myocardium. The stable HIF expression achieved by genetic modification or siRNA transfection has been shown previously to protect mouse myocardium from an ischemic insult (Holscher et al. 2011, Hyvarinen et al. 2010, Natarajan et al. 2006). However, there are also reports indicating that chronic activation of HIFs could result in heart failure that mimicks ischemic cardiomyopathy (Holscher et al. 2012, Moslehi et al. 2010). Hence, the role of HIFs in cardioprotection versus cardiac injury remains to be fully characterized. An ideal gene therapy construct would not only increase vascularity and perfusion but also improve energy metabolism of the target tissue as an indicator of the functionality of the induced vessels. In this study, changes in muscle energy metabolism in the context of exercise following AdHIF gene transfers were evaluated using 31P-MRS, which can be used to assess the metabolic correlates of tissue perfusion in a noninvasive manner. AdHIF-1α, in particular, improved the recovery of ischemic limbs from the energy loss induced by electrical stimulation in comparison to AdLacZ. This is in line with previous findings from a study performed in a transgenic mouse model that revealed an unchanged cellular energy state after ischemia as a result of stable HIF-1 and HIF-2 expression (Hyvarinen et al. 2010). However, neither of the AdHIFs improved exercise tolerance of the ischemic limbs in this study, which has been previously shown for AdPlGF and AdVEGF-A by 31P-MRS using a similar rest-exerciserecovery protocol (Korpisalo et al. 2008b, Gowdak et al. 2000). It is possible that different growth factors and stimulators of angiogenesis influence different phases in muscle energy metabolism. Altogether, it was observed that the angiogenic effect induced by AdHIF-1α resulted in metabolic improvements, indicative of normal function of the angiogenic vessels. 31P-MRS is a relevant method for obtaining objective information about the energy state and function of muscles and its values have been shown to correlate with several clinical parameters such as the ankle-brachial index in patients with PAD (Greiner et al. 2006). In future studies of proangiogenic gene therapy, muscle metabolism could also be measured by 18FDG PET, which 66 utilizes radiolabeled glucose to reveal the metabolic status of tissue (Pappas, Olcott & Drace 2001). In summary, the dilation of capillaries, increased muscle perfusion, and the elevated number of opened collaterals observed after gene transfer with AdHIFs resulted in enhanced recovery of ischemic muscles from exercise in the experimental ischemic animal model employed in this study. It should be noted, however, that this study was performed in young, healthy animals, and the ischemia was caused by ligating an artery causing an abrupt change in blood flow. The pathophysiology involved in the gradual occlusion of arteries in chronic human atherosclerotic disease differs considerably from the acute ligation of healthy arteries. Indeed, the therapeutic potential of AdHIF-1α has been called into question by a recent clinical trial that showed no benefit from AdHIF-1 GT in the treatment of intermittent claudication of PAD patients (Creager et al. 2011). There has been a trend among angiogenic gene therapy studies that the promising results obtained in experimental models cannot be replicated in clinical trials. Several reasons have been postulated to account for this discrepancy, such as inadequate dosing, insufficient duration of exposure to the angiogenic agent, compromised delivery and poor vector transduction efficiency (Dragneva, Korpisalo & Yla-Herttuala 2013). The species-, age-, and health-related differences between animal models and patients, as discussed above, may also account for the failure in the translation of techniques optimized in animals to the human clinical population. In future preclinical studies of proangiogenic gene therapy, it would be advisable to favour large animals rather than rodents, and, instead of using young and healthy animals, to employ disease models such as atherosclerotic or diabetic models that better mimick ischemic disease in humans. Taken together, the three studies included in this thesis revealed that adenoviral gene transfer as a tool to induce neovessel growth, whether it be angiogenic or lymphangiogenic, is sufficient to achieve effects that lead not only to histological changes in the target tissue, but also achieve functional improvements. AdVEGF-C and Ad-VEGF-D improved lymphatic flow through the induction of lymphangiogenesis, whereas angiogenesis triggered by AdHIF-1α in ischemic muscles led to improved energy recovery after exercise. Importantly, these effects were demonstrated using large mammals, which adds to their relevance with regard to their potential clinical translation. Notable angiogenic and lymphangiogenic effects were observed both when the expression of only a single growth factor, such as VEGF-C or VEGF-D in the first two studies or VEGF-A in the third study, was altered, and when transcription factors HIF-1α/2α, which govern the expression of several growth factors, were administered. The concept of employing a “master-switch” agent rather than a single growth factor to yield a more physiological induction of neovessel growth is not a new concept in therapeutic angiogenesis. Already in the year 2000, a consensus statement by a panel of researchers in this field proposed that a combination of angiogenic cytokines or the use of transcription factors that upregulate several genes may be optimal for clinically beneficial therapeutic angiogenesis (Simons et al. 2000). Experimental support for this strategy had been obtained previously from studies in transgenic mice: the over-expression of VEGF-A was found to induce formation of hyperpermeable blood vessels and subsequent edema in the skin of mice, whereas simultaneous over-expression of VEGF-A and ANG1 produced vessels that were not leaky (Thurston et al. 1999, Larcher et al. 1998). Although the direct over-expression of VEGF-C via adenoviral vectors studied in this thesis was found to be effective without side-effects, the modulation of VEGF-C activity as a way of stimulating therapeutic lymphangiogenesis only emerged recently, when CCBE1 was shown to be a strong activator of VEGF-C. In one experiment, mouse skeletal muscles displayed significantly enhanced lymphangiogenesis when transduced with AAV vectors expressing both CCBE1 and VEGF-C, as compared to transduction with AAV expressing VEGF-C alone. (Jeltsch et al. 2014.) Hence, the implementation of several factors may also confer added benefit in the field of therapeutic lymphangiogenesis. 67 7 Conclusions and future perspectives The following conclusions can be drawn from the individual studies (I-III) of this thesis: I Short-term adenoviral over-expression of both VEGF-C and VEGF-D led to pronounced lymphangiogenesis which was sufficient to improve lymphatic flow and to retain the architecture of the grafted lymph node. AdVEGF-D increased seroma formation as compared to AdVEGF-C and appeared not only to have lymphatic effects but also blood vascular effects were noted. II AdVEGF-C gene transfer performed into the fat surrounding the lymph node graft is the preferred method of administering lymphangiogenic gene therapy in prospective clinical trials of lymphedema. III Transient adenoviral over-expression of HIFs resulted in the enlargement of capillaries and an increase in muscle perfusion that was sufficient to improve the metabolic recovery of rabbit ischemic skeletal muscle from exercise. Influencing several angiogenic factors at a more upstream level by using HIFs leads to a more physiological angiogenic response than the use of a single, strong angiogenic growth factor such as VEGF-A. In summary, adenovirus-mediated, transient over-expression of growth factors is sufficient to induce lymphatic and blood vessel growth, which results in measurable functional effects, such as improvements in lymphatic flow and enhanced energy metabolism in ischemic muscles. Although the over-expression of a single growth factor may be sufficient to achieve these effects, the upregulation of several growth factors rather than simply one factor might represent an alternative therapeutic target since it may achieve a more physiological response and thus be less likely to cause side-effects. Specifically, the adenoviral VEGF-C gene therapy studied in this thesis may provide a treatment option for lymphedema patients when administered in conjunction with the lymph node transfer procedure. AdVEGF-C could easily be injected into the edges of a lymphatic tissue flap harvested from the patient’s abdominal wall and inserted to the recipient site in the lymphedematous area. A phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adenoviral VEGF-C in the treatment of secondary lymphedema is being designed and scheduled to begin in the near future. For the transcription factor HIF-1α/2α gene therapy, further pre-clinical studies are needed, and the adequate dosing and duration of therapy, end-points, and potential patient populations will have to be re-evaluated before drawing any final conclusions about the potential benefits of this therapy in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. . 68 69 8 References Gene Therapy Clinical Trials Worldwide 2015, [Homepage of John Wiley and Sons Ltd.], [Online]. Available: http://www.abedia.com/wiley/vectors.php. HSCI Receives Approval To Market Neovasculgen – The First Russian Gene Therapy Drug For Treatment Of Peripheral Arterial Disease [Homepage of Gene Therapy Net], [Online]. Available: http://www.genetherapynet.com/january-2012.html. Aase, K., von Euler, G., Li, X., Ponten, A., Thoren, P., Cao, R., Cao, Y., Olofsson, B., Gebre-Medhin, S., Pekny, M., Alitalo, K., Betsholtz, C. & Eriksson, U. 2001, "Vascular endothelial growth factor-B-deficient mice display an atrial conduction defect", Circulation, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 358-364. Abe, R. 1976, "A study on the pathogenesis of postmastectomy lymphedema", The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 163-171. Abtahian, F., Guerriero, A., Sebzda, E., Lu, M.M., Zhou, R., Mocsai, A., Myers, E.E., Huang, B., Jackson, D.G., Ferrari, V.A., Tybulewicz, V., Lowell, C.A., Lepore, J.J., Koretzky, G.A. & Kahn, M.L. 2003, "Regulation of blood and lymphatic vascular separation by signaling proteins SLP-76 and Syk", Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 299, no. 5604, pp. 247-251. Achen, M.G., Jeltsch, M., Kukk, E., Makinen, T., Vitali, A., Wilks, A.F., Alitalo, K. & Stacker, S.A. 1998, "Vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D) is a ligand for the tyrosine kinases VEGF receptor 2 (Flk1) and VEGF receptor 3 (Flt4)", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 548-553. Achen, M.G. & Stacker, S.A. 2008, "Molecular control of lymphatic metastasis", Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1131, pp. 225-234. Adams, R.H. & Alitalo, K. 2007, "Molecular regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis", Nature reviews.Molecular cell biology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 464-478. Adams, R.H. & Eichmann, A. 2010, "Axon guidance molecules in vascular patterning", Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. a001875. Airenne, K.J., Hu, Y.C., Kost, T.A., Smith, R.H., Kotin, R.M., Ono, C., Matsuura, Y., Wang, S. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2013, "Baculovirus: an insect-derived vector for diverse gene transfer applications", Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 739-749. Albuquerque, R.J., Hayashi, T., Cho, W.G., Kleinman, M.E., Dridi, S., Takeda, A., Baffi, J.Z., Yamada, K., Kaneko, H., Green, M.G., Chappell, J., Wilting, J., Weich, H.A., Yamagami, S., Amano, S., Mizuki, N., Alexander, J.S., Peterson, M.L., Brekken, R.A., Hirashima, M., Capoor, S., Usui, T., Ambati, B.K. & Ambati, J. 2009, "Alternatively spliced vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 is an essential endogenous inhibitor of lymphatic vessel growth", Nature medicine, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1023-1030. Alders, M., Hogan, B.M., Gjini, E., Salehi, F., Al-Gazali, L., Hennekam, E.A., Holmberg, E.E., Mannens, M.M., Mulder, M.F., Offerhaus, G.J., Prescott, T.E., Schroor, E.J., Verheij, J.B., Witte, M., Zwijnenburg, P.J., Vikkula, M., Schulte-Merker, S. & Hennekam, R.C. 2009, "Mutations in CCBE1 cause generalized lymph vessel dysplasia in humans", Nature genetics, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1272-1274. Alemany, R., Suzuki, K. & Curiel, D.T. 2000, "Blood clearance rates of adenovirus type 5 in mice", The Journal of general virology, vol. 81, no. Pt 11, pp. 2605-2609. 70 Alitalo, K. 2011, "The lymphatic vasculature in disease", Nature medicine, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1371-1380. Anisimov, A., Alitalo, A., Korpisalo, P., Soronen, J., Kaijalainen, S., Leppanen, V.M., Jeltsch, M., Yla-Herttuala, S. & Alitalo, K. 2009, "Activated forms of VEGF-C and VEGF-D provide improved vascular function in skeletal muscle", Circulation research, vol. 104, no. 11, pp. 1302-1312. Armulik, A., Abramsson, A. & Betsholtz, C. 2005, "Endothelial/pericyte interactions", Circulation research, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 512-523. Aronovich, E.L., McIvor, R.S. & Hackett, P.B. 2011, "The Sleeping Beauty transposon system: a non-viral vector for gene therapy", Human molecular genetics, vol. 20, no. R1, pp. R14-20. Asahara, T., Murohara, T., Sullivan, A., Silver, M., van der Zee, R., Li, T., Witzenbichler, B., Schatteman, G. & Isner, J.M. 1997, "Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis", Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 275, no. 5302, pp. 964-967. Au, A.C., Hernandez, P.A., Lieber, E., Nadroo, A.M., Shen, Y.M., Kelley, K.A., Gelb, B.D. & Diaz, G.A. 2010, "Protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPN14 is a regulator of lymphatic function and choanal development in humans", American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 436-444. Autiero, M., Waltenberger, J., Communi, D., Kranz, A., Moons, L., Lambrechts, D., Kroll, J., Plaisance, S., De Mol, M., Bono, F., Kliche, S., Fellbrich, G., Ballmer-Hofer, K., Maglione, D., Mayr-Beyrle, U., Dewerchin, M., Dombrowski, S., Stanimirovic, D., Van Hummelen, P., Dehio, C., Hicklin, D.J., Persico, G., Herbert, J.M., Communi, D., Shibuya, M., Collen, D., Conway, E.M. & Carmeliet, P. 2003, "Role of PlGF in the intra- and intermolecular cross talk between the VEGF receptors Flt1 and Flk1", Nature medicine, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 936943. Badimon, L. & Vilahur, G. 2012, "LDL-cholesterol versus HDL-cholesterol in the atherosclerotic plaque: inflammatory resolution versus thrombotic chaos", Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1254, pp. 18-32. Baffour, R., Garb, J.L., Kaufman, J., Berman, J., Rhee, S.W., Norris, M.A. & Friedmann, P. 2000, "Angiogenic therapy for the chronically ischemic lower limb in a rabbit model", The Journal of surgical research, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 219-229. Baker, A., Kim, H., Semple, J.L., Dumont, D., Shoichet, M., Tobbia, D. & Johnston, M. 2010, "Experimental assessment of pro-lymphangiogenic growth factors in the treatment of post-surgical lymphedema following lymphadenectomy", Breast cancer research : BCR, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. R70. Baldwin, H.S. 1996, "Early embryonic vascular development", Cardiovascular research, vol. 31 Spec No, pp. E3445. Baldwin, M.E., Halford, M.M., Roufail, S., Williams, R.A., Hibbs, M.L., Grail, D., Kubo, H., Stacker, S.A. & Achen, M.G. 2005, "Vascular endothelial growth factor D is dispensable for development of the lymphatic system", Molecular and cellular biology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2441-2449. Baluk, P., Fuxe, J., Hashizume, H., Romano, T., Lashnits, E., Butz, S., Vestweber, D., Corada, M., Molendini, C., Dejana, E. & McDonald, D.M. 2007, "Functionally specialized junctions between endothelial cells of lymphatic vessels", The Journal of experimental medicine, vol. 204, no. 10, pp. 2349-2362. Banerji, S., Ni, J., Wang, S.X., Clasper, S., Su, J., Tammi, R., Jones, M. & Jackson, D.G. 1999, "LYVE-1, a new homologue of the CD44 glycoprotein, is a lymph-specific receptor for hyaluronan", The Journal of cell biology, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 789-801. Baumeister, R.G. & Siuda, S. 1990, "Treatment of lymphedemas by microsurgical lymphatic grafting: what is proved?", Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 64-74; discussion 75-6. 71 Becker, C., Assouad, J., Riquet, M. & Hidden, G. 2006, "Postmastectomy lymphedema: long-term results following microsurgical lymph node transplantation", Annals of Surgery, vol. 243, no. 3, pp. 313-315. Becker, P.M., Waltenberger, J., Yachechko, R., Mirzapoiazova, T., Sham, J.S., Lee, C.G., Elias, J.A. & Verin, A.D. 2005, "Neuropilin-1 regulates vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated endothelial permeability", Circulation research, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 1257-1265. Bellomo, D., Headrick, J.P., Silins, G.U., Paterson, C.A., Thomas, P.S., Gartside, M., Mould, A., Cahill, M.M., Tonks, I.D., Grimmond, S.M., Townson, S., Wells, C., Little, M., Cummings, M.C., Hayward, N.K. & Kay, G.F. 2000, "Mice lacking the vascular endothelial growth factor-B gene (Vegfb) have smaller hearts, dysfunctional coronary vasculature, and impaired recovery from cardiac ischemia", Circulation research, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. E29-35. Bergelson, J.M., Cunningham, J.A., Droguett, G., Kurt-Jones, E.A., Krithivas, A., Hong, J.S., Horwitz, M.S., Crowell, R.L. & Finberg, R.W. 1997, "Isolation of a common receptor for Coxsackie B viruses and adenoviruses 2 and 5", Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 275, no. 5304, pp. 1320-1323. Bergers, G. & Benjamin, L.E. 2003, "Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch", Nature reviews.Cancer, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 401-410. Bergers, G. & Hanahan, D. 2008, "Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy", Nature reviews.Cancer, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 592-603. Bergmann, C.E., Hoefer, I.E., Meder, B., Roth, H., van Royen, N., Breit, S.M., Jost, M.M., Aharinejad, S., Hartmann, S. & Buschmann, I.R. 2006, "Arteriogenesis depends on circulating monocytes and macrophage accumulation and is severely depressed in op/op mice", Journal of leukocyte biology, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 59-65. Bertozzi, C.C., Schmaier, A.A., Mericko, P., Hess, P.R., Zou, Z., Chen, M., Chen, C.Y., Xu, B., Lu, M.M., Zhou, D., Sebzda, E., Santore, M.T., Merianos, D.J., Stadtfeld, M., Flake, A.W., Graf, T., Skoda, R., Maltzman, J.S., Koretzky, G.A. & Kahn, M.L. 2010, "Platelets regulate lymphatic vascular development through CLEC-2-SLP-76 signaling", Blood, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 661-670. Blum, K.S., Hadamitzky, C., Gratz, K.F. & Pabst, R. 2010, "Effects of autotransplanted lymph node fragments on the lymphatic system in the pig model", Breast cancer research and treatment, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 59-66. Bos, F.L., Caunt, M., Peterson-Maduro, J., Planas-Paz, L., Kowalski, J., Karpanen, T., van Impel, A., Tong, R., Ernst, J.A., Korving, J., van Es, J.H., Lammert, E., Duckers, H.J. & Schulte-Merker, S. 2011, "CCBE1 is essential for mammalian lymphatic vascular development and enhances the lymphangiogenic effect of vascular endothelial growth factor-C in vivo", Circulation research, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 486-491. Bosch-Marce, M., Okuyama, H., Wesley, J.B., Sarkar, K., Kimura, H., Liu, Y.V., Zhang, H., Strazza, M., Rey, S., Savino, L., Zhou, Y.F., McDonald, K.R., Na, Y., Vandiver, S., Rabi, A., Shaked, Y., Kerbel, R., Lavallee, T. & Semenza, G.L. 2007, "Effects of aging and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 activity on angiogenic cell mobilization and recovery of perfusion after limb ischemia", Circulation research, vol. 101, no. 12, pp. 1310-1318. Bouvree, K., Brunet, I., Del Toro, R., Gordon, E., Prahst, C., Cristofaro, B., Mathivet, T., Xu, Y., Soueid, J., Fortuna, V., Miura, N., Aigrot, M.S., Maden, C.H., Ruhrberg, C., Thomas, J.L. & Eichmann, A. 2012, "Semaphorin3A, Neuropilin-1, and PlexinA1 are required for lymphatic valve formation", Circulation research, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 437-445. Brautigam, P., Foldi, E., Schaiper, I., Krause, T., Vanscheidt, W. & Moser, E. 1998, "Analysis of lymphatic drainage in various forms of leg edema using two compartment lymphoscintigraphy", Lymphology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 43-55. Breidenbach, M., Rein, D.T., Wang, M., Nettelbeck, D.M., Hemminki, A., Ulasov, I., Rivera, A.R., Everts, M., Alvarez, R.D., Douglas, J.T. & Curiel, D.T. 2004, "Genetic replacement of the adenovirus shaft fiber reduces liver tropism in ovarian cancer gene therapy", Human Gene Therapy, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 509-518. 72 Breiteneder-Geleff, S., Soleiman, A., Kowalski, H., Horvat, R., Amann, G., Kriehuber, E., Diem, K., Weninger, W., Tschachler, E., Alitalo, K. & Kerjaschki, D. 1999, "Angiosarcomas express mixed endothelial phenotypes of blood and lymphatic capillaries: podoplanin as a specific marker for lymphatic endothelium", The American journal of pathology, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 385-394. Breslin, J.W. 2014, "Mechanical forces and lymphatic transport", Microvascular research, vol. 96, pp. 46-54. Brice, G., Child, A.H., Evans, A., Bell, R., Mansour, S., Burnand, K., Sarfarazi, M., Jeffery, S. & Mortimer, P. 2005, "Milroy disease and the VEGFR-3 mutation phenotype", Journal of medical genetics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 98102. Bridges, J.P., Lin, S., Ikegami, M. & Shannon, J.M. 2012, "Conditional hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha induction in embryonic pulmonary epithelium impairs maturation and augments lymphangiogenesis", Developmental biology, vol. 362, no. 1, pp. 24-41. Brorson, H. 2003, "Liposuction in arm lymphedema treatment", Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 287-295. Brouillard, P., Boon, L. & Vikkula, M. 2014, "Genetics of lymphatic anomalies", The Journal of clinical investigation, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 898-904. Brown, H.M., Robker, R.L. & Russell, D.L. 2010, "Development and hormonal regulation of the ovarian lymphatic vasculature", Endocrinology, vol. 151, no. 11, pp. 5446-5455. Bry, M., Kivela, R., Leppanen, V.M. & Alitalo, K. 2014, "Vascular endothelial growth factor-B in physiology and disease", Physiological Reviews, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 779-794. Burri, P.H. & Djonov, V. 2002, "Intussusceptive angiogenesis--the alternative to capillary sprouting", Molecular aspects of medicine, vol. 23, no. 6S, pp. S1-27. Buttler, K., Kreysing, A., von Kaisenberg, C.S., Schweigerer, L., Gale, N., Papoutsi, M. & Wilting, J. 2006, "Mesenchymal cells with leukocyte and lymphendothelial characteristics in murine embryos", Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists, vol. 235, no. 6, pp. 1554-1562. Campisi, C. & Boccardo, F. 2004, "Microsurgical techniques for lymphedema treatment: derivative lymphaticvenous microsurgery", World journal of surgery, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 609-613. Cao, Y., Ji, W.R., Qi, P., Rosin, A. & Cao, Y. 1997, "Placenta growth factor: identification and characterization of a novel isoform generated by RNA alternative splicing", Biochemical and biophysical research communications, vol. 235, no. 3, pp. 493-498. Cao, Y., Linden, P., Farnebo, J., Cao, R., Eriksson, A., Kumar, V., Qi, J.H., Claesson-Welsh, L. & Alitalo, K. 1998, "Vascular endothelial growth factor C induces angiogenesis in vivo", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 24, pp. 14389-14394. Carmeliet, P., Ferreira, V., Breier, G., Pollefeyt, S., Kieckens, L., Gertsenstein, M., Fahrig, M., Vandenhoeck, A., Harpal, K., Eberhardt, C., Declercq, C., Pawling, J., Moons, L., Collen, D., Risau, W. & Nagy, A. 1996, "Abnormal blood vessel development and lethality in embryos lacking a single VEGF allele", Nature, vol. 380, no. 6573, pp. 435-439. Carmeliet, P. & Jain, R.K. 2011, "Principles and mechanisms of vessel normalization for cancer and other angiogenic diseases", Nature reviews.Drug discovery, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 417-427. Carmeliet, P. & Jain, R.K. 2000, "Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases", Nature, vol. 407, no. 6801, pp. 249257. Carmeliet, P., Moons, L., Luttun, A., Vincenti, V., Compernolle, V., De Mol, M., Wu, Y., Bono, F., Devy, L., Beck, H., Scholz, D., Acker, T., DiPalma, T., Dewerchin, M., Noel, A., Stalmans, I., Barra, A., Blacher, S., 73 VandenDriessche, T., Ponten, A., Eriksson, U., Plate, K.H., Foidart, J.M., Schaper, W., Charnock-Jones, D.S., Hicklin, D.J., Herbert, J.M., Collen, D. & Persico, M.G. 2001, "Synergism between vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor contributes to angiogenesis and plasma extravasation in pathological conditions", Nature medicine, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 575-583. Carragher, D.M., Rangel-Moreno, J. & Randall, T.D. 2008, "Ectopic lymphoid tissues and local immunity", Seminars in immunology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 26-42. Cartier, N., Hacein-Bey-Abina, S., Bartholomae, C.C., Veres, G., Schmidt, M., Kutschera, I., Vidaud, M., Abel, U., Dal-Cortivo, L., Caccavelli, L., Mahlaoui, N., Kiermer, V., Mittelstaedt, D., Bellesme, C., Lahlou, N., Lefrere, F., Blanche, S., Audit, M., Payen, E., Leboulch, P., l'Homme, B., Bougneres, P., Von Kalle, C., Fischer, A., Cavazzana-Calvo, M. & Aubourg, P. 2009, "Hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy with a lentiviral vector in Xlinked adrenoleukodystrophy", Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 326, no. 5954, pp. 818-823. Caunt, M., Mak, J., Liang, W.C., Stawicki, S., Pan, Q., Tong, R.K., Kowalski, J., Ho, C., Reslan, H.B., Ross, J., Berry, L., Kasman, I., Zlot, C., Cheng, Z., Le Couter, J., Filvaroff, E.H., Plowman, G., Peale, F., French, D., Carano, R., Koch, A.W., Wu, Y., Watts, R.J., Tessier-Lavigne, M. & Bagri, A. 2008, "Blocking neuropilin-2 function inhibits tumor cell metastasis", Cancer cell, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 331-342. Cavazzana-Calvo, M., Hacein-Bey, S., de Saint Basile, G., Gross, F., Yvon, E., Nusbaum, P., Selz, F., Hue, C., Certain, S., Casanova, J.L., Bousso, P., Deist, F.L. & Fischer, A. 2000, "Gene therapy of human severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)-X1 disease", Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 288, no. 5466, pp. 669-672. Chang, X.Z., Yin, J., Sun, J., Zhang, X.H. & Cao, X.C. 2013, "A retrospective study of different local treatments in breast cancer patients with synchronous ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis", Journal of cancer research and therapeutics, vol. 9 Suppl, pp. S158-61. Chen, L., Hamrah, P., Cursiefen, C., Zhang, Q., Pytowski, B., Streilein, J.W. & Dana, M.R. 2004, "Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 mediates induction of corneal alloimmunity", Nature medicine, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 813-815. Cheung, L., Han, J., Beilhack, A., Joshi, S., Wilburn, P., Dua, A., An, A. & Rockson, S.G. 2006, "An experimental model for the study of lymphedema and its response to therapeutic lymphangiogenesis", BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 363-370. Choi, I., Lee, S., Kyoung Chung, H., Suk Lee, Y., Eui Kim, K., Choi, D., Park, E.K., Yang, D., Ecoiffier, T., Monahan, J., Chen, W., Aguilar, B., Lee, H.N., Yoo, J., Koh, C.J., Chen, L., Wong, A.K. & Hong, Y.K. 2012, "9-Cis Retinoic Acid Promotes Lymphangiogenesis and Enhances Lymphatic Vessel Regeneration: Therapeutic Implications of 9Cis Retinoic Acid for Secondary Lymphedema", Circulation, vol. 125, no. 7, pp. 872-882. Cianfarani, F., Zambruno, G., Brogelli, L., Sera, F., Lacal, P.M., Pesce, M., Capogrossi, M.C., Failla, C.M., Napolitano, M. & Odorisio, T. 2006, "Placenta growth factor in diabetic wound healing: altered expression and therapeutic potential", The American journal of pathology, vol. 169, no. 4, pp. 1167-1182. Clauss, M., Weich, H., Breier, G., Knies, U., Rockl, W., Waltenberger, J. & Risau, W. 1996, "The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor Flt-1 mediates biological activities. Implications for a functional role of placenta growth factor in monocyte activation and chemotaxis", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 271, no. 30, pp. 17629-17634. Collins, C.D., Mortimer, P.S., D'Ettorre, H., A'Hern, R.P. & Moskovic, E.C. 1995, "Computed tomography in the assessment of response to limb compression in unilateral lymphoedema", Clinical radiology, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 541-544. Compernolle, V., Brusselmans, K., Acker, T., Hoet, P., Tjwa, M., Beck, H., Plaisance, S., Dor, Y., Keshet, E., Lupu, F., Nemery, B., Dewerchin, M., Van Veldhoven, P., Plate, K., Moons, L., Collen, D. & Carmeliet, P. 2002, "Loss of HIF-2alpha and inhibition of VEGF impair fetal lung maturation, whereas treatment with VEGF prevents fatal respiratory distress in premature mice", Nature medicine, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 702-710. 74 Connell, F., Brice, G. & Mortimer, P. 2008, "Phenotypic characterization of primary lymphedema", Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1131, pp. 140-146. Connell, F.C., Gordon, K., Brice, G., Keeley, V., Jeffery, S., Mortimer, P.S., Mansour, S. & Ostergaard, P. 2013, "The classification and diagnostic algorithm for primary lymphatic dysplasia: an update from 2010 to include molecular findings", Clinical genetics, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 303-314. Conway, E.M., Collen, D. & Carmeliet, P. 2001, "Molecular mechanisms of blood vessel growth", Cardiovascular research, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 507-521. Copp, A.J. 1995, "Death before birth: clues from gene knockouts and mutations", Trends in genetics : TIG, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 87-93. Coultas, L., Chawengsaksophak, K. & Rossant, J. 2005, "Endothelial cells and VEGF in vascular development", Nature, vol. 438, no. 7070, pp. 937-945. Crawford, Y. & Ferrara, N. 2009, "VEGF inhibition: insights from preclinical and clinical studies", Cell and tissue research, vol. 335, no. 1, pp. 261-269. Creager, M.A., Olin, J.W., Belch, J.J., Moneta, G.L., Henry, T.D., Rajagopalan, S., Annex, B.H. & Hiatt, W.R. 2011, "Effect of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha gene therapy on walking performance in patients with intermittent claudication", Circulation, vol. 124, no. 16, pp. 1765-1773. Criqui, M.H., McClelland, R.L., McDermott, M.M., Allison, M.A., Blumenthal, R.S., Aboyans, V., Ix, J.H., Burke, G.L., Liu, K. & Shea, S. 2010, "The ankle-brachial index and incident cardiovascular events in the MESA (MultiEthnic Study of Atherosclerosis)", Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 56, no. 18, pp. 15061512. Crystal, R.G. 2014, "Adenovirus: the first effective in vivo gene delivery vector", Human Gene Therapy, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3-11. Crystal, R.G., Harvey, B.G., Wisnivesky, J.P., O'Donoghue, K.A., Chu, K.W., Maroni, J., Muscat, J.C., Pippo, A.L., Wright, C.E., Kaner, R.J., Leopold, P.L., Kessler, P.D., Rasmussen, H.S., Rosengart, T.K. & Hollmann, C. 2002, "Analysis of risk factors for local delivery of low- and intermediate-dose adenovirus gene transfer vectors to individuals with a spectrum of comorbid conditions", Human Gene Therapy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 65-100. Cueni, L.N. & Detmar, M. 2008, "The lymphatic system in health and disease", Lymphatic research and biology, vol. 6, no. 3-4, pp. 109-122. Cursiefen, C., Chen, L., Borges, L.P., Jackson, D., Cao, J., Radziejewski, C., D'Amore, P.A., Dana, M.R., Wiegand, S.J. & Streilein, J.W. 2004, "VEGF-A stimulates lymphangiogenesis and hemangiogenesis in inflammatory neovascularization via macrophage recruitment", The Journal of clinical investigation, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 1040-1050. Damstra, R.J., Voesten, H.G., Klinkert, P. & Brorson, H. 2009, "Circumferential suction-assisted lipectomy for lymphoedema after surgery for breast cancer", The British journal of surgery, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 859-864. Davison, A.J., Benko, M. & Harrach, B. 2003, "Genetic content and evolution of adenoviruses", The Journal of general virology, vol. 84, no. Pt 11, pp. 2895-2908. Daya, S. & Berns, K.I. 2008, "Gene therapy using adeno-associated virus vectors", Clinical microbiology reviews, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 583-593. De Backer, T., Vander Stichele, R., Lehert, P. & Van Bortel, L. 2009, "Naftidrofuryl for intermittent claudication: meta-analysis based on individual patient data", BMJ (Clinical research ed.), vol. 338, pp. b603. 75 De Smet, F., Segura, I., De Bock, K., Hohensinner, P.J. & Carmeliet, P. 2009, "Mechanisms of vessel branching: filopodia on endothelial tip cells lead the way", Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 639-649. Debrah, A.Y., Mand, S., Specht, S., Marfo-Debrekyei, Y., Batsa, L., Pfarr, K., Larbi, J., Lawson, B., Taylor, M., Adjei, O. & Hoerauf, A. 2006, "Doxycycline reduces plasma VEGF-C/sVEGFR-3 and improves pathology in lymphatic filariasis", PLoS pathogens, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. e92. Dehghanian, F., Hojati, Z. & Kay, M. 2014, "New Insights into VEGF-A Alternative Splicing: Key Regulatory Switching in the Pathological Process", Avicenna journal of medical biotechnology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 192-199. Deindl, E., Hoefer, I.E., Fernandez, B., Barancik, M., Heil, M., Strniskova, M. & Schaper, W. 2003, "Involvement of the fibroblast growth factor system in adaptive and chemokine-induced arteriogenesis", Circulation research, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 561-568. Dejana, E., Corada, M. & Lampugnani, M.G. 1995, "Endothelial cell-to-cell junctions", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 910-918. Dellinger, M., Hunter, R., Bernas, M., Gale, N., Yancopoulos, G., Erickson, R. & Witte, M. 2008, "Defective remodeling and maturation of the lymphatic vasculature in Angiopoietin-2 deficient mice", Developmental biology, vol. 319, no. 2, pp. 309-320. Dellinger, M.T., Meadows, S.M., Wynne, K., Cleaver, O. & Brekken, R.A. 2013, "Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 promotes the development of the lymphatic vasculature", PloS one, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. e74686. DiSipio, T., Rye, S., Newman, B. & Hayes, S. 2013, "Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis", The Lancet.Oncology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 500-515. Dixon, J.B. 2010a, "Lymphatic lipid transport: sewer or subway?", Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 480-487. Dixon, J.B. 2010b, "Mechanisms of chylomicron uptake into lacteals", Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1207 Suppl 1, pp. E52-7. Dizaj, S.M., Jafari, S. & Khosroushahi, A.Y. 2014, "A sight on the current nanoparticle-based gene delivery vectors", Nanoscale research letters, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 252-276X-9-252. eCollection 2014. Dragneva, G., Korpisalo, P. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2013, "Promoting blood vessel growth in ischemic diseases: challenges in translating preclinical potential into clinical success", Disease models & mechanisms, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 312-322. Drake, R., Vogl, W. & Mitchell, A. 2005, Gray's Anatomy for Students, 1st edition, Churchill Livingstone, London. Drude, I., Dombos, V., Vauleon, S. & Muller, S. 2007, "Drugs made of RNA: development and application of engineered RNAs for gene therapy", Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 912-931. Dumont, D.J., Jussila, L., Taipale, J., Lymboussaki, A., Mustonen, T., Pajusola, K., Breitman, M. & Alitalo, K. 1998, "Cardiovascular failure in mouse embryos deficient in VEGF receptor-3", Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 282, no. 5390, pp. 946-949. Dvorak, H.F., Brown, L.F., Detmar, M. & Dvorak, A.M. 1995, "Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular hyperpermeability, and angiogenesis", The American journal of pathology, vol. 146, no. 5, pp. 1029-1039. Eguchi, M., Masuda, H. & Asahara, T. 2007, "Endothelial progenitor cells for postnatal vasculogenesis", Clinical and experimental nephrology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 18-25. Eichmann, A., Makinen, T. & Alitalo, K. 2005, "Neural guidance molecules regulate vascular remodeling and vessel navigation", Genes & development, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1013-1021. 76 Elmore, S.A. 2006, "Histopathology of the lymph nodes", Toxicologic pathology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 425-454. Ema, M., Taya, S., Yokotani, N., Sogawa, K., Matsuda, Y. & Fujii-Kuriyama, Y. 1997, "A novel bHLH-PAS factor with close sequence similarity to hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha regulates the VEGF expression and is potentially involved in lung and vascular development", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 4273-4278. Endemann, D.H. & Schiffrin, E.L. 2004, "Endothelial dysfunction", Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1983-1992. Enholm, B., Karpanen, T., Jeltsch, M., Kubo, H., Stenback, F., Prevo, R., Jackson, D.G., Yla-Herttuala, S. & Alitalo, K. 2001, "Adenoviral expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-C induces lymphangiogenesis in the skin", Circulation research, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 623-629. Enholm, B., Paavonen, K., Ristimaki, A., Kumar, V., Gunji, Y., Klefstrom, J., Kivinen, L., Laiho, M., Olofsson, B., Joukov, V., Eriksson, U. & Alitalo, K. 1997, "Comparison of VEGF, VEGF-B, VEGF-C and Ang-1 mRNA regulation by serum, growth factors, oncoproteins and hypoxia", Oncogene, vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 2475-2483. European Stroke Organisation, Authors/Task Force Members, Tendera, M., Aboyans, V., Bartelink, M.L., Baumgartner, I., Clement, D., Collet, J.P., Cremonesi, A., De Carlo, M., Erbel, R., Fowkes, F.G., Heras, M., Kownator, S., Minar, E., Ostergren, J., Poldermans, D., Riambau, V., Roffi, M., Rother, J., Sievert, H., van Sambeek, M., Zeller, T., ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines, Bax, J., Auricchio, A., Baumgartner, H., Ceconi, C., Dean, V., Deaton, C., Fagard, R., Funck-Brentano, C., Hasdai, D., Hoes, A., Knuuti, J., Kolh, P., McDonagh, T., Moulin, C., Poldermans, D., Popescu, B., Reiner, Z., Sechtem, U., Sirnes, P.A., Torbicki, A., Vahanian, A., Windecker, S., Document Reviewers, Kolh, P., Torbicki, A., Agewall, S., Blinc, A., Bulvas, M., Cosentino, F., De Backer, T., Gottsater, A., Gulba, D., Guzik, T.J., Jonsson, B., Kesmarky, G., Kitsiou, A., Kuczmik, W., Larsen, M.L., Madaric, J., Mas, J.L., McMurray, J.J., Micari, A., Mosseri, M., Muller, C., Naylor, R., Norrving, B., Oto, O., Pasierski, T., Plouin, P.F., Ribichini, F., Ricco, J.B., Ruilope, L., Schmid, J.P., Schwehr, U., Sol, B.G., Sprynger, M., Tiefenbacher, C., Tsioufis, C. & Van Damme, H. 2011, "ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases: Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries: the Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Artery Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)", European heart journal, vol. 32, no. 22, pp. 2851-2906. Fadini, G.P., Maruyama, S., Ozaki, T., Taguchi, A., Meigs, J., Dimmeler, S., Zeiher, A.M., de Kreutzenberg, S., Avogaro, A., Nickenig, G., Schmidt-Lucke, C. & Werner, N. 2010, "Circulating progenitor cell count for cardiovascular risk stratification: a pooled analysis", PloS one, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. e11488. Fang, J., Dagenais, S.L., Erickson, R.P., Arlt, M.F., Glynn, M.W., Gorski, J.L., Seaver, L.H. & Glover, T.W. 2000, "Mutations in FOXC2 (MFH-1), a forkhead family transcription factor, are responsible for the hereditary lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome", American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1382-1388. Fann, J.I., Sokoloff, M.H., Sarris, G.E., Yun, K.L., Kosek, J.C. & Miller, D.C. 1990, "The reversibility of canine veingraft arterialization", Circulation, vol. 82, no. 5 Suppl, pp. IV9-18. Favier, B., Alam, A., Barron, P., Bonnin, J., Laboudie, P., Fons, P., Mandron, M., Herault, J.P., Neufeld, G., Savi, P., Herbert, J.M. & Bono, F. 2006, "Neuropilin-2 interacts with VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 and promotes human endothelial cell survival and migration", Blood, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 1243-1250. Felmerer, G., Sattler, T., Lohrmann, C. & Tobbia, D. 2012, "Treatment of various secondary lymphedemas by microsurgical lymph vessel transplantation", Microsurgery, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 171-177. Ferrara, N., Gerber, H.P. & LeCouter, J. 2003, "The biology of VEGF and its receptors", Nature medicine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 669-676. 77 Ferrell, R.E., Baty, C.J., Kimak, M.A., Karlsson, J.M., Lawrence, E.C., Franke-Snyder, M., Meriney, S.D., Feingold, E. & Finegold, D.N. 2010, "GJC2 missense mutations cause human lymphedema", American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 943-948. Ferrell, R.E. & Finegold, D.N. 2008, "Research perspectives in inherited lymphatic disease: an update", Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1131, pp. 134-139. Finegold, D.N., Baty, C.J., Knickelbein, K.Z., Perschke, S., Noon, S.E., Campbell, D., Karlsson, J.M., Huang, D., Kimak, M.A., Lawrence, E.C., Feingold, E., Meriney, S.D., Brufsky, A.M. & Ferrell, R.E. 2012, "Connexin 47 mutations increase risk for secondary lymphedema following breast cancer treatment", Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 2382-2390. Finney, B.A., Schweighoffer, E., Navarro-Nunez, L., Benezech, C., Barone, F., Hughes, C.E., Langan, S.A., Lowe, K.L., Pollitt, A.Y., Mourao-Sa, D., Sheardown, S., Nash, G.B., Smithers, N., Reis e Sousa, C., Tybulewicz, V.L. & Watson, S.P. 2012, "CLEC-2 and Syk in the megakaryocytic/platelet lineage are essential for development", Blood, vol. 119, no. 7, pp. 1747-1756. Fischer, C., Mazzone, M., Jonckx, B. & Carmeliet, P. 2008, "FLT1 and its ligands VEGFB and PlGF: drug targets for anti-angiogenic therapy?", Nature reviews.Cancer, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 942-956. Flister, M.J., Wilber, A., Hall, K.L., Iwata, C., Miyazono, K., Nisato, R.E., Pepper, M.S., Zawieja, D.C. & Ran, S. 2010, "Inflammation induces lymphangiogenesis through up-regulation of VEGFR-3 mediated by NF-kappaB and Prox1", Blood, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 418-429. Folkman, J. 1971, "Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications", The New England journal of medicine, vol. 285, no. 21, pp. 1182-1186. Fong, G.H., Rossant, J., Gertsenstein, M. & Breitman, M.L. 1995, "Role of the Flt-1 receptor tyrosine kinase in regulating the assembly of vascular endothelium", Nature, vol. 376, no. 6535, pp. 66-70. Fong, G.H., Zhang, L., Bryce, D.M. & Peng, J. 1999, "Increased hemangioblast commitment, not vascular disorganization, is the primary defect in flt-1 knock-out mice", Development (Cambridge, England), vol. 126, no. 13, pp. 3015-3025. Forsythe, J.A., Jiang, B.H., Iyer, N.V., Agani, F., Leung, S.W., Koos, R.D. & Semenza, G.L. 1996, "Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription by hypoxia-inducible factor 1", Molecular and cellular biology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 4604-4613. Francois, M., Caprini, A., Hosking, B., Orsenigo, F., Wilhelm, D., Browne, C., Paavonen, K., Karnezis, T., Shayan, R., Downes, M., Davidson, T., Tutt, D., Cheah, K.S., Stacker, S.A., Muscat, G.E., Achen, M.G., Dejana, E. & Koopman, P. 2008, "Sox18 induces development of the lymphatic vasculature in mice", Nature, vol. 456, no. 7222, pp. 643-647. Furtado, G.C., Marinkovic, T., Martin, A.P., Garin, A., Hoch, B., Hubner, W., Chen, B.K., Genden, E., Skobe, M. & Lira, S.A. 2007, "Lymphotoxin beta receptor signaling is required for inflammatory lymphangiogenesis in the thyroid", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 12, pp. 5026-5031. Futterer, A., Mink, K., Luz, A., Kosco-Vilbois, M.H. & Pfeffer, K. 1998, "The lymphotoxin beta receptor controls organogenesis and affinity maturation in peripheral lymphoid tissues", Immunity, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 59-70. Gale, N.W., Thurston, G., Hackett, S.F., Renard, R., Wang, Q., McClain, J., Martin, C., Witte, C., Witte, M.H., Jackson, D., Suri, C., Campochiaro, P.A., Wiegand, S.J. & Yancopoulos, G.D. 2002, "Angiopoietin-2 is required for postnatal angiogenesis and lymphatic patterning, and only the latter role is rescued by Angiopoietin-1", Developmental cell, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 411-423. 78 Gerber, H.P., Condorelli, F., Park, J. & Ferrara, N. 1997, "Differential transcriptional regulation of the two vascular endothelial growth factor receptor genes. Flt-1, but not Flk-1/KDR, is up-regulated by hypoxia", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 272, no. 38, pp. 23659-23667. Ghalamkarpour, A., Holnthoner, W., Saharinen, P., Boon, L.M., Mulliken, J.B., Alitalo, K. & Vikkula, M. 2009, "Recessive primary congenital lymphoedema caused by a VEGFR3 mutation", Journal of medical genetics, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 399-404. Gielen, S., Schuler, G. & Adams, V. 2010, "Cardiovascular effects of exercise training: molecular mechanisms", Circulation, vol. 122, no. 12, pp. 1221-1238. Gille, H., Kowalski, J., Li, B., LeCouter, J., Moffat, B., Zioncheck, T.F., Pelletier, N. & Ferrara, N. 2001, "Analysis of biological effects and signaling properties of Flt-1 (VEGFR-1) and KDR (VEGFR-2). A reassessment using novel receptor-specific vascular endothelial growth factor mutants", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 276, no. 5, pp. 3222-3230. Girard, J.P. & Springer, T.A. 1995, "High endothelial venules (HEVs): specialized endothelium for lymphocyte migration", Immunology today, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 449-457. Gordon, K., Schulte, D., Brice, G., Simpson, M.A., Roukens, M.G., van Impel, A., Connell, F., Kalidas, K., Jeffery, S., Mortimer, P.S., Mansour, S., Schulte-Merker, S. & Ostergaard, P. 2013a, "Mutation in vascular endothelial growth factor-C, a ligand for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3, is associated with autosomal dominant milroy-like primary lymphedema", Circulation research, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 956-960. Gordon, K., Spiden, S.L., Connell, F.C., Brice, G., Cottrell, S., Short, J., Taylor, R., Jeffery, S., Mortimer, P.S., Mansour, S. & Ostergaard, P. 2013b, "FLT4/VEGFR3 and Milroy disease: novel mutations, a review of published variants and database update", Human mutation, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 23-31. Gowdak, L.H., Poliakova, L., Wang, X., Kovesdi, I., Fishbein, K.W., Zacheo, A., Palumbo, R., Straino, S., Emanueli, C., Marrocco-Trischitta, M., Lakatta, E.G., Anversa, P., Spencer, R.G., Talan, M. & Capogrossi, M.C. 2000, "Adenovirus-mediated VEGF(121) gene transfer stimulates angiogenesis in normoperfused skeletal muscle and preserves tissue perfusion after induction of ischemia", Circulation, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 565-571. Gown, A.M., Tsukada, T. & Ross, R. 1986, "Human atherosclerosis. II. Immunocytochemical analysis of the cellular composition of human atherosclerotic lesions", The American journal of pathology, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 191207. Grabner, R., Lotzer, K., Dopping, S., Hildner, M., Radke, D., Beer, M., Spanbroek, R., Lippert, B., Reardon, C.A., Getz, G.S., Fu, Y.X., Hehlgans, T., Mebius, R.E., van der Wall, M., Kruspe, D., Englert, C., Lovas, A., Hu, D., Randolph, G.J., Weih, F. & Habenicht, A.J. 2009, "Lymphotoxin beta receptor signaling promotes tertiary lymphoid organogenesis in the aorta adventitia of aged ApoE-/- mice", The Journal of experimental medicine, vol. 206, no. 1, pp. 233-248. Grech, E.D. 2003, "Pathophysiology and investigation of coronary artery disease", BMJ (Clinical research ed.), vol. 326, no. 7397, pp. 1027-1030. Greiner, A., Esterhammer, R., Messner, H., Biebl, M., Muhlthaler, H., Fraedrich, G., Jaschke, W.R. & Schocke, M.F. 2006, "High-energy phosphate metabolism during incremental calf exercise in patients with unilaterally symptomatic peripheral arterial disease measured by phosphor 31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy", Journal of vascular surgery, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 978-986. Gu, C., Rodriguez, E.R., Reimert, D.V., Shu, T., Fritzsch, B., Richards, L.J., Kolodkin, A.L. & Ginty, D.D. 2003, "Neuropilin-1 conveys semaphorin and VEGF signaling during neural and cardiovascular development", Developmental cell, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45-57. Gupta, R., Tongers, J. & Losordo, D.W. 2009, "Human studies of angiogenic gene therapy", Circulation research, vol. 105, no. 8, pp. 724-736. 79 Guyton, A. & Hall, J. 2006, Textbook of Medical Physiology, 11th Edition, Elsevier Saunders. Hacein-Bey-Abina, S., Garrigue, A., Wang, G.P., Soulier, J., Lim, A., Morillon, E., Clappier, E., Caccavelli, L., Delabesse, E., Beldjord, K., Asnafi, V., MacIntyre, E., Dal Cortivo, L., Radford, I., Brousse, N., Sigaux, F., Moshous, D., Hauer, J., Borkhardt, A., Belohradsky, B.H., Wintergerst, U., Velez, M.C., Leiva, L., Sorensen, R., Wulffraat, N., Blanche, S., Bushman, F.D., Fischer, A. & Cavazzana-Calvo, M. 2008, "Insertional oncogenesis in 4 patients after retrovirus-mediated gene therapy of SCID-X1", The Journal of clinical investigation, vol. 118, no. 9, pp. 3132-3142. Hacein-Bey-Abina, S., Von Kalle, C., Schmidt, M., McCormack, M.P., Wulffraat, N., Leboulch, P., Lim, A., Osborne, C.S., Pawliuk, R., Morillon, E., Sorensen, R., Forster, A., Fraser, P., Cohen, J.I., de Saint Basile, G., Alexander, I., Wintergerst, U., Frebourg, T., Aurias, A., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Romana, S., Radford-Weiss, I., Gross, F., Valensi, F., Delabesse, E., Macintyre, E., Sigaux, F., Soulier, J., Leiva, L.E., Wissler, M., Prinz, C., Rabbitts, T.H., Le Deist, F., Fischer, A. & Cavazzana-Calvo, M. 2003, "LMO2-associated clonal T cell proliferation in two patients after gene therapy for SCID-X1", Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 302, no. 5644, pp. 415-419. Hadamitzky, C., Blum, K.S. & Pabst, R. 2009, "Regeneration of autotransplanted avascular lymph nodes in the rat is improved by platelet-rich plasma", Journal of vascular research, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 389-396. Hadamitzky, C. & Pabst, R. 2008, "Acquired lymphedema: an urgent need for adequate animal models", Cancer research, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 343-345. Hadjipanayi, E. & Schilling, A.F. 2013, "Hypoxia-based strategies for angiogenic induction: the dawn of a new era for ischemia therapy and tissue regeneration", Organogenesis, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 261-272. Haiko, P., Makinen, T., Keskitalo, S., Taipale, J., Karkkainen, M.J., Baldwin, M.E., Stacker, S.A., Achen, M.G. & Alitalo, K. 2008, "Deletion of vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) and VEGF-D is not equivalent to VEGF receptor 3 deletion in mouse embryos", Molecular and cellular biology, vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 4843-4850. Hammer, A. & Steiner, S. 2013, "Gene therapy for therapeutic angiogenesis in peripheral arterial disease - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials", VASA.Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 331-339. Hanahan, D. & Folkman, J. 1996, "Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis", Cell, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 353-364. Harvey, B.G., Maroni, J., O'Donoghue, K.A., Chu, K.W., Muscat, J.C., Pippo, A.L., Wright, C.E., Hollmann, C., Wisnivesky, J.P., Kessler, P.D., Rasmussen, H.S., Rosengart, T.K. & Crystal, R.G. 2002, "Safety of local delivery of low- and intermediate-dose adenovirus gene transfer vectors to individuals with a spectrum of morbid conditions", Human Gene Therapy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 15-63. Harvey, N.L., Srinivasan, R.S., Dillard, M.E., Johnson, N.C., Witte, M.H., Boyd, K., Sleeman, M.W. & Oliver, G. 2005, "Lymphatic vascular defects promoted by Prox1 haploinsufficiency cause adult-onset obesity", Nature genetics, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1072-1081. He, Y., Rajantie, I., Pajusola, K., Jeltsch, M., Holopainen, T., Yla-Herttuala, S., Harding, T., Jooss, K., Takahashi, T. & Alitalo, K. 2005, "Vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor 3-mediated activation of lymphatic endothelium is crucial for tumor cell entry and spread via lymphatic vessels", Cancer research, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 4739-4746. Hedman, M., Hartikainen, J., Syvanne, M., Stjernvall, J., Hedman, A., Kivela, A., Vanninen, E., Mussalo, H., Kauppila, E., Simula, S., Narvanen, O., Rantala, A., Peuhkurinen, K., Nieminen, M.S., Laakso, M. & YlaHerttuala, S. 2003, "Safety and feasibility of catheter-based local intracoronary vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfer in the prevention of postangioplasty and in-stent restenosis and in the treatment of chronic myocardial ischemia: phase II results of the Kuopio Angiogenesis Trial (KAT)", Circulation, vol. 107, no. 21, pp. 2677-2683. 80 Hedman, M., Muona, K., Hedman, A., Kivela, A., Syvanne, M., Eranen, J., Rantala, A., Stjernvall, J., Nieminen, M.S., Hartikainen, J. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2009, "Eight-year safety follow-up of coronary artery disease patients after local intracoronary VEGF gene transfer", Gene therapy, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 629-634. Heil, M. & Schaper, W. 2004, "Influence of mechanical, cellular, and molecular factors on collateral artery growth (arteriogenesis)", Circulation research, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 449-458. Hendrickx, R., Stichling, N., Koelen, J., Kuryk, L., Lipiec, A. & Greber, U.F. 2014, "Innate immunity to adenovirus", Human Gene Therapy, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 265-284. Herd-Smith, A., Russo, A., Muraca, M.G., Del Turco, M.R. & Cardona, G. 2001, "Prognostic factors for lymphedema after primary treatment of breast carcinoma", Cancer, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 1783-1787. Hersey, P. & Gallagher, S. 2014, "Intralesional immunotherapy for melanoma", Journal of surgical oncology, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 320-326. Herzog, Y., Kalcheim, C., Kahane, N., Reshef, R. & Neufeld, G. 2001, "Differential expression of neuropilin-1 and neuropilin-2 in arteries and veins", Mechanisms of development, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 115-119. Hickey, M.M. & Simon, M.C. 2006, "Regulation of angiogenesis by hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors", Current topics in developmental biology, vol. 76, pp. 217-257. Hill, J.M., Zalos, G., Halcox, J.P., Schenke, W.H., Waclawiw, M.A., Quyyumi, A.A. & Finkel, T. 2003, "Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk", The New England journal of medicine, vol. 348, no. 7, pp. 593-600. Hirakawa, S., Brown, L.F., Kodama, S., Paavonen, K., Alitalo, K. & Detmar, M. 2007, "VEGF-C-induced lymphangiogenesis in sentinel lymph nodes promotes tumor metastasis to distant sites", Blood, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 1010-1017. Hiratsuka, S., Minowa, O., Kuno, J., Noda, T. & Shibuya, M. 1998, "Flt-1 lacking the tyrosine kinase domain is sufficient for normal development and angiogenesis in mice", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 16, pp. 9349-9354. Hirsch, A.T., Haskal, Z.J., Hertzer, N.R., Bakal, C.W., Creager, M.A., Halperin, J.L., Hiratzka, L.F., Murphy, W.R., Olin, J.W., Puschett, J.B., Rosenfield, K.A., Sacks, D., Stanley, J.C., Taylor, L.M.,Jr, White, C.J., White, J., White, R.A., Antman, E.M., Smith, S.C.,Jr, Adams, C.D., Anderson, J.L., Faxon, D.P., Fuster, V., Gibbons, R.J., Hunt, S.A., Jacobs, A.K., Nishimura, R., Ornato, J.P., Page, R.L., Riegel, B., American Association for Vascular Surgery, Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease, American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Society for Vascular Nursing, TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus & Vascular Disease Foundation 2006, "ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation", Circulation, vol. 113, no. 11, pp. e463-654. Hirschi, K.K. & D'Amore, P.A. 1996, "Pericytes in the microvasculature", Cardiovascular research, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 687-698. 81 Hoefer, I.E., van Royen, N., Buschmann, I.R., Piek, J.J. & Schaper, W. 2001, "Time course of arteriogenesis following femoral artery occlusion in the rabbit", Cardiovascular research, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 609-617. Hoerauf, A. 2008, "Filariasis: new drugs and new opportunities for lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis", Current opinion in infectious diseases, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 673-681. Hogan, B.M., Bos, F.L., Bussmann, J., Witte, M., Chi, N.C., Duckers, H.J. & Schulte-Merker, S. 2009, "Ccbe1 is required for embryonic lymphangiogenesis and venous sprouting", Nature genetics, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 396398. Holmquist-Mengelbier, L., Fredlund, E., Lofstedt, T., Noguera, R., Navarro, S., Nilsson, H., Pietras, A., VallonChristersson, J., Borg, A., Gradin, K., Poellinger, L. & Pahlman, S. 2006, "Recruitment of HIF-1alpha and HIF2alpha to common target genes is differentially regulated in neuroblastoma: HIF-2alpha promotes an aggressive phenotype", Cancer cell, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 413-423. Holopainen, T., Bry, M., Alitalo, K. & Saaristo, A. 2011, "Perspectives on lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in cancer", Journal of surgical oncology, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 484-488. Holscher, M., Schafer, K., Krull, S., Farhat, K., Hesse, A., Silter, M., Lin, Y., Pichler, B.J., Thistlethwaite, P., ElArmouche, A., Maier, L.S., Katschinski, D.M. & Zieseniss, A. 2012, "Unfavourable consequences of chronic cardiac HIF-1alpha stabilization", Cardiovascular research, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 77-86. Holscher, M., Silter, M., Krull, S., von Ahlen, M., Hesse, A., Schwartz, P., Wielockx, B., Breier, G., Katschinski, D.M. & Zieseniss, A. 2011, "Cardiomyocyte-specific prolyl-4-hydroxylase domain 2 knock out protects from acute myocardial ischemic injury", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 286, no. 13, pp. 11185-11194. Hong, Y.K., Lange-Asschenfeldt, B., Velasco, P., Hirakawa, S., Kunstfeld, R., Brown, L.F., Bohlen, P., Senger, D.R. & Detmar, M. 2004, "VEGF-A promotes tissue repair-associated lymphatic vessel formation via VEGFR-2 and the alpha1beta1 and alpha2beta1 integrins", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1111-1113. Hu, C.J., Wang, L.Y., Chodosh, L.A., Keith, B. & Simon, M.C. 2003, "Differential roles of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha) and HIF-2alpha in hypoxic gene regulation", Molecular and cellular biology, vol. 23, no. 24, pp. 9361-9374. Huang, K., Andersson, C., Roomans, G.M., Ito, N. & Claesson-Welsh, L. 2001, "Signaling properties of VEGF receptor-1 and -2 homo- and heterodimers", The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 315-324. Huang, L.E., Arany, Z., Livingston, D.M. & Bunn, H.F. 1996, "Activation of hypoxia-inducible transcription factor depends primarily upon redox-sensitive stabilization of its alpha subunit", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 271, no. 50, pp. 32253-32259. Huusko, J., Lottonen, L., Merentie, M., Gurzeler, E., Anisimov, A., Miyanohara, A., Alitalo, K., Tavi, P. & YlaHerttuala, S. 2012, "AAV9-mediated VEGF-B gene transfer improves systolic function in progressive left ventricular hypertrophy", Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 2212-2221. Huusko, J., Merentie, M., Dijkstra, M.H., Ryhanen, M.M., Karvinen, H., Rissanen, T.T., Vanwildemeersch, M., Hedman, M., Lipponen, J., Heinonen, S.E., Eriksson, U., Shibuya, M. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2010, "The effects of VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2 ligands on angiogenic responses and left ventricular function in mice", Cardiovascular research, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 122-130. Hyvarinen, J., Hassinen, I.E., Sormunen, R., Maki, J.M., Kivirikko, K.I., Koivunen, P. & Myllyharju, J. 2010, "Hearts of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl 4-hydroxylase-2 hypomorphic mice show protection against acute ischemiareperfusion injury", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 285, no. 18, pp. 13646-13657. 82 Ikomi, F., Yokoyama, Y., Ogiwara, N., Sasaki, K., Mizuno, R. & Ohhashi, T. 2006, "Recanalization of the collecting lymphatics in rabbit hind leg", Microcirculation (New York, N.Y.: 1994), vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 365-376. International Society of Lymphology 2009, "The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema. 2009 Concensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology", Lymphology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 51-60. Irrthum, A., Devriendt, K., Chitayat, D., Matthijs, G., Glade, C., Steijlen, P.M., Fryns, J.P., Van Steensel, M.A. & Vikkula, M. 2003, "Mutations in the transcription factor gene SOX18 underlie recessive and dominant forms of hypotrichosis-lymphedema-telangiectasia", American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 14701478. Irrthum, A., Karkkainen, M.J., Devriendt, K., Alitalo, K. & Vikkula, M. 2000, "Congenital hereditary lymphedema caused by a mutation that inactivates VEGFR3 tyrosine kinase", American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 295-301. Ishii, H., Yazawa, T., Sato, H., Suzuki, T., Ikeda, M., Hayashi, Y., Takanashi, Y. & Kitamura, H. 2004, "Enhancement of pleural dissemination and lymph node metastasis of intrathoracic lung cancer cells by vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs)", Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 325-337. Isner, J.M., Pieczek, A., Schainfeld, R., Blair, R., Haley, L., Asahara, T., Rosenfield, K., Razvi, S., Walsh, K. & Symes, J.F. 1996, "Clinical evidence of angiogenesis after arterial gene transfer of phVEGF165 in patient with ischaemic limb", Lancet, vol. 348, no. 9024, pp. 370-374. Ito, W.D., Arras, M., Scholz, D., Winkler, B., Htun, P. & Schaper, W. 1997, "Angiogenesis but not collateral growth is associated with ischemia after femoral artery occlusion", The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 273, no. 3 Pt 2, pp. H1255-65. Iyer, N.V., Kotch, L.E., Agani, F., Leung, S.W., Laughner, E., Wenger, R.H., Gassmann, M., Gearhart, J.D., Lawler, A.M., Yu, A.Y. & Semenza, G.L. 1998, "Cellular and developmental control of O2 homeostasis by hypoxiainducible factor 1 alpha", Genes & development, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 149-162. Jaakkola, P., Mole, D.R., Tian, Y.M., Wilson, M.I., Gielbert, J., Gaskell, S.J., Kriegsheim, A., Hebestreit, H.F., Mukherji, M., Schofield, C.J., Maxwell, P.H., Pugh, C.W. & Ratcliffe, P.J. 2001, "Targeting of HIF-alpha to the von Hippel-Lindau ubiquitylation complex by O2-regulated prolyl hydroxylation", Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 292, no. 5516, pp. 468-472. Jain, R.K. 2003, "Molecular regulation of vessel maturation", Nature medicine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 685-693. Jakus, Z., Gleghorn, J.P., Enis, D.R., Sen, A., Chia, S., Liu, X., Rawnsley, D.R., Yang, Y., Hess, P.R., Zou, Z., Yang, J., Guttentag, S.H., Nelson, C.M. & Kahn, M.L. 2014, "Lymphatic function is required prenatally for lung inflation at birth", The Journal of experimental medicine, vol. 211, no. 5, pp. 815-826. Jeltsch, M., Jha, S.K., Tvorogov, D., Anisimov, A., Leppanen, V.M., Holopainen, T., Kivela, R., Ortega, S., Karpanen, T. & Alitalo, K. 2014, "CCBE1 enhances lymphangiogenesis via A disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin motifs-3-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor-C activation", Circulation, vol. 129, no. 19, pp. 1962-1971. Jeltsch, M., Leppanen, V.M., Saharinen, P. & Alitalo, K. 2013, "Receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated angiogenesis", Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 10.1101/cshperspect.a009183. Jeltsch, M., Tammela, T., Alitalo, K. & Wilting, J. 2003, "Genesis and pathogenesis of lymphatic vessels", Cell and tissue research, vol. 314, no. 1, pp. 69-84. Jiang, B.H., Rue, E., Wang, G.L., Roe, R. & Semenza, G.L. 1996, "Dimerization, DNA binding, and transactivation properties of hypoxia-inducible factor 1", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 271, no. 30, pp. 1777117778. 83 Johnson, N.C., Dillard, M.E., Baluk, P., McDonald, D.M., Harvey, N.L., Frase, S.L. & Oliver, G. 2008, "Lymphatic endothelial cell identity is reversible and its maintenance requires Prox1 activity", Genes & development, vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 3282-3291. Jolicoeur, E.M., Cartier, R., Henry, T.D., Barsness, G.W., Bourassa, M.G., McGillion, M. & L'Allier, P.L. 2012, "Patients with coronary artery disease unsuitable for revascularization: definition, general principles, and a classification", The Canadian journal of cardiology, vol. 28, no. 2 Suppl, pp. S50-9. Joukov, V., Kumar, V., Sorsa, T., Arighi, E., Weich, H., Saksela, O. & Alitalo, K. 1998, "A recombinant mutant vascular endothelial growth factor-C that has lost vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 binding, activation, and vascular permeability activities", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 273, no. 12, pp. 6599-6602. Joukov, V., Sorsa, T., Kumar, V., Jeltsch, M., Claesson-Welsh, L., Cao, Y., Saksela, O., Kalkkinen, N. & Alitalo, K. 1997, "Proteolytic processing regulates receptor specificity and activity of VEGF-C", The EMBO journal, vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 3898-3911. Jurisic, G. & Detmar, M. 2009, "Lymphatic endothelium in health and disease", Cell and tissue research, vol. 335, no. 1, pp. 97-108. Jurisic, G., Maby-El Hajjami, H., Karaman, S., Ochsenbein, A.M., Alitalo, A., Siddiqui, S.S., Ochoa Pereira, C., Petrova, T.V. & Detmar, M. 2012, "An unexpected role of semaphorin3a-neuropilin-1 signaling in lymphatic vessel maturation and valve formation", Circulation research, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 426-436. Jussila, L., Valtola, R., Partanen, T.A., Salven, P., Heikkila, P., Matikainen, M.T., Renkonen, R., Kaipainen, A., Detmar, M., Tschachler, E., Alitalo, R. & Alitalo, K. 1998, "Lymphatic endothelium and Kaposi's sarcoma spindle cells detected by antibodies against the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3", Cancer research, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1599-1604. Kaelin, W.G.,Jr & Ratcliffe, P.J. 2008, "Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway", Molecular cell, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 393-402. Kaipainen, A., Korhonen, J., Mustonen, T., van Hinsbergh, V.W., Fang, G.H., Dumont, D., Breitman, M. & Alitalo, K. 1995, "Expression of the fms-like tyrosine kinase 4 gene becomes restricted to lymphatic endothelium during development", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 3566-3570. Kaiser, J. 2009, "Gene therapy. Beta-thalassemia treatment succeeds, with a caveat", Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 326, no. 5959, pp. 1468-1469. Kajiya, K., Hirakawa, S. & Detmar, M. 2006, "Vascular endothelial growth factor-A mediates ultraviolet B-induced impairment of lymphatic vessel function", The American journal of pathology, vol. 169, no. 4, pp. 1496-1503. Kajiya, K., Hirakawa, S., Ma, B., Drinnenberg, I. & Detmar, M. 2005, "Hepatocyte growth factor promotes lymphatic vessel formation and function", The EMBO journal, vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 2885-2895. Kamimura, K., Suda, T., Zhang, G. & Liu, D. 2011, "Advances in Gene Delivery Systems", Pharmaceutical Medicine, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 293-306. Kamura, T., Sato, S., Iwai, K., Czyzyk-Krzeska, M., Conaway, R.C. & Conaway, J.W. 2000, "Activation of HIF1alpha ubiquitination by a reconstituted von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor complex", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 19, pp. 10430-10435. Kanerva, A., Mikheeva, G.V., Krasnykh, V., Coolidge, C.J., Lam, J.T., Mahasreshti, P.J., Barker, S.D., Straughn, M., Barnes, M.N., Alvarez, R.D., Hemminki, A. & Curiel, D.T. 2002, "Targeting adenovirus to the serotype 3 receptor increases gene transfer efficiency to ovarian cancer cells", Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 275-280. 84 Karkkainen, A.M., Kotimaa, A., Huusko, J., Kholova, I., Heinonen, S.E., Stefanska, A., Dijkstra, M.H., Purhonen, H., Hamalainen, E., Makinen, P.I., Turunen, M.P. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2009, "Vascular endothelial growth factor-D transgenic mice show enhanced blood capillary density, improved postischemic muscle regeneration, and increased susceptibility to tumor formation", Blood, vol. 113, no. 18, pp. 4468-4475. Karkkainen, M.J., Ferrell, R.E., Lawrence, E.C., Kimak, M.A., Levinson, K.L., McTigue, M.A., Alitalo, K. & Finegold, D.N. 2000, "Missense mutations interfere with VEGFR-3 signalling in primary lymphoedema", Nature genetics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 153-159. Karkkainen, M.J., Haiko, P., Sainio, K., Partanen, J., Taipale, J., Petrova, T.V., Jeltsch, M., Jackson, D.G., Talikka, M., Rauvala, H., Betsholtz, C. & Alitalo, K. 2004, "Vascular endothelial growth factor C is required for sprouting of the first lymphatic vessels from embryonic veins", Nature immunology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 74-80. Karkkainen, M.J., Saaristo, A., Jussila, L., Karila, K.A., Lawrence, E.C., Pajusola, K., Bueler, H., Eichmann, A., Kauppinen, R., Kettunen, M.I., Yla-Herttuala, S., Finegold, D.N., Ferrell, R.E. & Alitalo, K. 2001, "A model for gene therapy of human hereditary lymphedema", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 22, pp. 12677-12682. Karpanen, T. & Alitalo, K. 2008, "Molecular biology and pathology of lymphangiogenesis", Annual review of pathology, vol. 3, pp. 367-397. Karpanen, T., Heckman, C.A., Keskitalo, S., Jeltsch, M., Ollila, H., Neufeld, G., Tamagnone, L. & Alitalo, K. 2006a, "Functional interaction of VEGF-C and VEGF-D with neuropilin receptors", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1462-1472. Karpanen, T., Wirzenius, M., Makinen, T., Veikkola, T., Haisma, H.J., Achen, M.G., Stacker, S.A., Pytowski, B., YlaHerttuala, S. & Alitalo, K. 2006b, "Lymphangiogenic growth factor responsiveness is modulated by postnatal lymphatic vessel maturation", The American journal of pathology, vol. 169, no. 2, pp. 708-718. Karvinen, H., Pasanen, E., Rissanen, T.T., Korpisalo, P., Vahakangas, E., Jazwa, A., Giacca, M. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2011, "Long-term VEGF-A expression promotes aberrant angiogenesis and fibrosis in skeletal muscle", Gene therapy, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1166-1172. Karvinen, H. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2010, "New aspects in vascular gene therapy", Current opinion in pharmacology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 208-211. Kassmeyer, S., Plendl, J., Custodis, P. & Bahramsoltani, M. 2009, "New insights in vascular development: vasculogenesis and endothelial progenitor cells", Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1-11. Kawamura, H., Li, X., Goishi, K., van Meeteren, L.A., Jakobsson, L., Cebe-Suarez, S., Shimizu, A., Edholm, D., Ballmer-Hofer, K., Kjellen, L., Klagsbrun, M. & Claesson-Welsh, L. 2008, "Neuropilin-1 in regulation of VEGFinduced activation of p38MAPK and endothelial cell organization", Blood, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 3638-3649. Kawasaki, T., Kitsukawa, T., Bekku, Y., Matsuda, Y., Sanbo, M., Yagi, T. & Fujisawa, H. 1999, "A requirement for neuropilin-1 in embryonic vessel formation", Development (Cambridge, England), vol. 126, no. 21, pp. 48954902. Kay, M.A., Glorioso, J.C. & Naldini, L. 2001, "Viral vectors for gene therapy: the art of turning infectious agents into vehicles of therapeutics", Nature medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33-40. Kendall, R.L. & Thomas, K.A. 1993, "Inhibition of vascular endothelial cell growth factor activity by an endogenously encoded soluble receptor", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 22, pp. 10705-10709. Kerjaschki, D., Huttary, N., Raab, I., Regele, H., Bojarski-Nagy, K., Bartel, G., Krober, S.M., Greinix, H., Rosenmaier, A., Karlhofer, F., Wick, N. & Mazal, P.R. 2006, "Lymphatic endothelial progenitor cells contribute to de novo lymphangiogenesis in human renal transplants", Nature medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 230-234. 85 Kholova, I., Dragneva, G., Cermakova, P., Laidinen, S., Kaskenpaa, N., Hazes, T., Cermakova, E., Steiner, I. & YlaHerttuala, S. 2011, "Lymphatic vasculature is increased in heart valves, ischaemic and inflamed hearts and in cholesterol-rich and calcified atherosclerotic lesions", European journal of clinical investigation, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 487-497. Kim, J.W., Tchernyshyov, I., Semenza, G.L. & Dang, C.V. 2006, "HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: a metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia", Cell metabolism, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 177-185. Kinnaird, T., Stabile, E., Burnett, M.S., Lee, C.W., Barr, S., Fuchs, S. & Epstein, S.E. 2004, "Marrow-derived stromal cells express genes encoding a broad spectrum of arteriogenic cytokines and promote in vitro and in vivo arteriogenesis through paracrine mechanisms", Circulation research, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 678-685. Kitsukawa, T., Shimono, A., Kawakami, A., Kondoh, H. & Fujisawa, H. 1995, "Overexpression of a membrane protein, neuropilin, in chimeric mice causes anomalies in the cardiovascular system, nervous system and limbs", Development (Cambridge, England), vol. 121, no. 12, pp. 4309-4318. Koch, S., Tugues, S., Li, X., Gualandi, L. & Claesson-Welsh, L. 2011, "Signal transduction by vascular endothelial growth factor receptors", The Biochemical journal, vol. 437, no. 2, pp. 169-183. Kondo, K., Kim, W.Y., Lechpammer, M. & Kaelin, W.G.,Jr 2003, "Inhibition of HIF2alpha is sufficient to suppress pVHL-defective tumor growth", PLoS biology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. E83. Kopp, H.G., Ramos, C.A. & Rafii, S. 2006, "Contribution of endothelial progenitors and proangiogenic hematopoietic cells to vascularization of tumor and ischemic tissue", Current opinion in hematology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 175-181. Korpisalo, P., Karvinen, H., Rissanen, T.T., Kilpijoki, J., Marjomaki, V., Baluk, P., McDonald, D.M., Cao, Y., Eriksson, U., Alitalo, K. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2008a, "Vascular endothelial growth factor-A and platelet-derived growth factor-B combination gene therapy prolongs angiogenic effects via recruitment of interstitial mononuclear cells and paracrine effects rather than improved pericyte coverage of angiogenic vessels", Circulation research, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. 1092-1099. Korpisalo, P., Rissanen, T.T., Bengtsson, T., Liimatainen, T., Laidinen, S., Karvinen, H., Markkanen, J.E., Grohn, O.H. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2008b, "Therapeutic angiogenesis with placental growth factor improves exercise tolerance of ischaemic rabbit hindlimbs", Cardiovascular research, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 263-270. Krause, A. & Worgall, S. 2011, "Delivery of antigens by viral vectors for vaccination", Therapeutic delivery, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 51-70. Krishnamoorthy, N., Viswanathan, S., Rekhi, B. & Jambhekar, N.A. 2012, "Lymphangiosarcoma arising after 33 years within a background of chronic filariasis: a case report with review of literature", Journal of cutaneous pathology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 52-55. Kukk, E., Lymboussaki, A., Taira, S., Kaipainen, A., Jeltsch, M., Joukov, V. & Alitalo, K. 1996, "VEGF-C receptor binding and pattern of expression with VEGFR-3 suggests a role in lymphatic vascular development", Development (Cambridge, England), vol. 122, no. 12, pp. 3829-3837. Kumar, V., Abbas, A. & Fausto, N. 2005, Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease, 7th Edition, Elsevier Saunders. Kusumanto, Y.H., van Weel, V., Mulder, N.H., Smit, A.J., van den Dungen, J.J., Hooymans, J.M., Sluiter, W.J., Tio, R.A., Quax, P.H., Gans, R.O., Dullaart, R.P. & Hospers, G.A. 2006, "Treatment with intramuscular vascular endothelial growth factor gene compared with placebo for patients with diabetes mellitus and critical limb ischemia: a double-blind randomized trial", Human Gene Therapy, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 683-691. Lähteenvuo, J. 2009, Gene Therapy for Ischemic Diseases, Kuopio University Publications. 86 Lahteenvuo, J.E., Lahteenvuo, M.T., Kivela, A., Rosenlew, C., Falkevall, A., Klar, J., Heikura, T., Rissanen, T.T., Vahakangas, E., Korpisalo, P., Enholm, B., Carmeliet, P., Alitalo, K., Eriksson, U. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2009, "Vascular endothelial growth factor-B induces myocardium-specific angiogenesis and arteriogenesis via vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1- and neuropilin receptor-1-dependent mechanisms", Circulation, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 845-856. Larcher, F., Murillas, R., Bolontrade, M., Conti, C.J. & Jorcano, J.L. 1998, "VEGF/VPF overexpression in skin of transgenic mice induces angiogenesis, vascular hyperpermeability and accelerated tumor development", Oncogene, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 303-311. Larrivee, B. & Karsan, A. 2007, "Involvement of marrow-derived endothelial cells in vascularization", Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol. (180), no. 180, pp. 89-114. Lawson, N.D., Vogel, A.M. & Weinstein, B.M. 2002, "sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor act upstream of the Notch pathway during arterial endothelial differentiation", Developmental cell, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 127-136. Le Guen, L., Karpanen, T., Schulte, D., Harris, N.C., Koltowska, K., Roukens, G., Bower, N.I., van Impel, A., Stacker, S.A., Achen, M.G., Schulte-Merker, S. & Hogan, B.M. 2014, "Ccbe1 regulates Vegfc-mediated induction of Vegfr3 signaling during embryonic lymphangiogenesis", Development (Cambridge, England), vol. 141, no. 6, pp. 1239-1249. le Noble, F., Moyon, D., Pardanaud, L., Yuan, L., Djonov, V., Matthijsen, R., Breant, C., Fleury, V. & Eichmann, A. 2004, "Flow regulates arterial-venous differentiation in the chick embryo yolk sac", Development (Cambridge, England), vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 361-375. Leak, L.V. & Burke, J.F. 1968, "Ultrastructural studies on the lymphatic anchoring filaments", The Journal of cell biology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 129-149. Lee, C.W., Stabile, E., Kinnaird, T., Shou, M., Devaney, J.M., Epstein, S.E. & Burnett, M.S. 2004, "Temporal patterns of gene expression after acute hindlimb ischemia in mice: insights into the genomic program for collateral vessel development", Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 474-482. Lee, R.J., Springer, M.L., Blanco-Bose, W.E., Shaw, R., Ursell, P.C. & Blau, H.M. 2000, "VEGF gene delivery to myocardium: deleterious effects of unregulated expression", Circulation, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 898-901. Lee, S., Kang, J., Yoo, J., Ganesan, S.K., Cook, S.C., Aguilar, B., Ramu, S., Lee, J. & Hong, Y.K. 2009, "Prox1 physically and functionally interacts with COUP-TFII to specify lymphatic endothelial cell fate", Blood, vol. 113, no. 8, pp. 1856-1859. Leppanen, P., Koota, S., Kholova, I., Koponen, J., Fieber, C., Eriksson, U., Alitalo, K. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2005, "Gene transfers of vascular endothelial growth factor-A, vascular endothelial growth factor-B, vascular endothelial growth factor-C, and vascular endothelial growth factor-D have no effects on atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic low-density lipoprotein-receptor/apolipoprotein B48-deficient mice", Circulation, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 1347-1352. Levick, J.R. & Michel, C.C. 2010, "Microvascular fluid exchange and the revised Starling principle", Cardiovascular research, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 198-210. Levine, G.N., Bates, E.R., Blankenship, J.C., Bailey, S.R., Bittl, J.A., Cercek, B., Chambers, C.E., Ellis, S.G., Guyton, R.A., Hollenberg, S.M., Khot, U.N., Lange, R.A., Mauri, L., Mehran, R., Moussa, I.D., Mukherjee, D., Nallamothu, B.K. & Ting, H.H. 2011, "2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions", Circulation, vol. 124, no. 23, pp. e574-651. 87 Li, M., Liu, C., Bin, J., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Xiu, J., Pei, J., Lai, Y., Chen, D., Fan, C., Xie, J., Tao, Y. & Wu, P. 2011, "Mutant hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha improves angiogenesis and tissue perfusion in ischemic rabbit skeletal muscle", Microvascular research, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 26-33. Libby, P. 2002, "Inflammation in atherosclerosis", Nature, vol. 420, no. 6917, pp. 868-874. Lim, H.Y., Rutkowski, J.M., Helft, J., Reddy, S.T., Swartz, M.A., Randolph, G.J. & Angeli, V. 2009, "Hypercholesterolemic mice exhibit lymphatic vessel dysfunction and degeneration", The American journal of pathology, vol. 175, no. 3, pp. 1328-1337. Lim, H.Y., Thiam, C.H., Yeo, K.P., Bisoendial, R., Hii, C.S., McGrath, K.C., Tan, K.W., Heather, A., Alexander, J.S. & Angeli, V. 2013, "Lymphatic vessels are essential for the removal of cholesterol from peripheral tissues by SRBI-mediated transport of HDL", Cell metabolism, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 671-684. Limbourg, A., Korff, T., Napp, L.C., Schaper, W., Drexler, H. & Limbourg, F.P. 2009, "Evaluation of postnatal arteriogenesis and angiogenesis in a mouse model of hind-limb ischemia", Nature protocols, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1737-1746. Lin, C.H., Ali, R., Chen, S.C., Wallace, C., Chang, Y.C., Chen, H.C. & Cheng, M.H. 2009, "Vascularized groin lymph node transfer using the wrist as a recipient site for management of postmastectomy upper extremity lymphedema", Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 1265-1275. Lin, F.J., Chen, X., Qin, J., Hong, Y.K., Tsai, M.J. & Tsai, S.Y. 2010, "Direct transcriptional regulation of neuropilin-2 by COUP-TFII modulates multiple steps in murine lymphatic vessel development", The Journal of clinical investigation, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 1694-1707. Lin, J., Lalani, A.S., Harding, T.C., Gonzalez, M., Wu, W.W., Luan, B., Tu, G.H., Koprivnikar, K., VanRoey, M.J., He, Y., Alitalo, K. & Jooss, K. 2005, "Inhibition of lymphogenous metastasis using adeno-associated virus-mediated gene transfer of a soluble VEGFR-3 decoy receptor", Cancer research, vol. 65, no. 15, pp. 6901-6909. Lin, Y., Weisdorf, D.J., Solovey, A. & Hebbel, R.P. 2000, "Origins of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial outgrowth from blood", The Journal of clinical investigation, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 71-77. Lindahl, P., Johansson, B.R., Leveen, P. & Betsholtz, C. 1997, "Pericyte loss and microaneurysm formation in PDGFB-deficient mice", Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 277, no. 5323, pp. 242-245. Loenarz, C., Coleman, M.L., Boleininger, A., Schierwater, B., Holland, P.W., Ratcliffe, P.J. & Schofield, C.J. 2011, "The hypoxia-inducible transcription factor pathway regulates oxygen sensing in the simplest animal, Trichoplax adhaerens", EMBO reports, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 63-70. Lohela, M., Bry, M., Tammela, T. & Alitalo, K. 2009, "VEGFs and receptors involved in angiogenesis versus lymphangiogenesis", Current opinion in cell biology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 154-165. Loscalzo, M.L., Van, P.L., Ho, V.B., Bakalov, V.K., Rosing, D.R., Malone, C.A., Dietz, H.C. & Bondy, C.A. 2005, "Association between fetal lymphedema and congenital cardiovascular defects in Turner syndrome", Pediatrics, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 732-735. Lozier, J.N., Csako, G., Mondoro, T.H., Krizek, D.M., Metzger, M.E., Costello, R., Vostal, J.G., Rick, M.E., Donahue, R.E. & Morgan, R.A. 2002, "Toxicity of a first-generation adenoviral vector in rhesus macaques", Human Gene Therapy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 113-124. Lusis, A.J. 2000, "Atherosclerosis", Nature, vol. 407, no. 6801, pp. 233-241. Luttun, A., Tjwa, M., Moons, L., Wu, Y., Angelillo-Scherrer, A., Liao, F., Nagy, J.A., Hooper, A., Priller, J., De Klerck, B., Compernolle, V., Daci, E., Bohlen, P., Dewerchin, M., Herbert, J.M., Fava, R., Matthys, P., Carmeliet, G., Collen, D., Dvorak, H.F., Hicklin, D.J. & Carmeliet, P. 2002, "Revascularization of ischemic tissues by PlGF treatment, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis, arthritis and atherosclerosis by anti-Flt1", Nature medicine, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 831-840. 88 Lymboussaki, A., Olofsson, B., Eriksson, U. & Alitalo, K. 1999, "Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF-C show overlapping binding sites in embryonic endothelia and distinct sites in differentiated adult endothelia", Circulation research, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 992-999. Machnik, A., Neuhofer, W., Jantsch, J., Dahlmann, A., Tammela, T., Machura, K., Park, J.K., Beck, F.X., Muller, D.N., Derer, W., Goss, J., Ziomber, A., Dietsch, P., Wagner, H., van Rooijen, N., Kurtz, A., Hilgers, K.F., Alitalo, K., Eckardt, K.U., Luft, F.C., Kerjaschki, D. & Titze, J. 2009, "Macrophages regulate salt-dependent volume and blood pressure by a vascular endothelial growth factor-C-dependent buffering mechanism", Nature medicine, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 545-552. Mack, C.A., Magovern, C.J., Budenbender, K.T., Patel, S.R., Schwarz, E.A., Zanzonico, P., Ferris, B., Sanborn, T., Isom, P., Ferris, B., Sanborn, T., Isom, O.W., Crystal, R.G. & Rosengart, T.K. 1998, "Salvage angiogenesis induced by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of vascular endothelial growth factor protects against ischemic vascular occlusion", Journal of vascular surgery, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 699-709. Mahon, P.C., Hirota, K. & Semenza, G.L. 2001, "FIH-1: a novel protein that interacts with HIF-1alpha and VHL to mediate repression of HIF-1 transcriptional activity", Genes & development, vol. 15, no. 20, pp. 2675-2686. Makinen, K., Manninen, H., Hedman, M., Matsi, P., Mussalo, H., Alhava, E. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2002, "Increased vascularity detected by digital subtraction angiography after VEGF gene transfer to human lower limb artery: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded phase II study", Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 127-133. Makinen, T., Adams, R.H., Bailey, J., Lu, Q., Ziemiecki, A., Alitalo, K., Klein, R. & Wilkinson, G.A. 2005, "PDZ interaction site in ephrinB2 is required for the remodeling of lymphatic vasculature", Genes & development, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 397-410. Makinen, T., Olofsson, B., Karpanen, T., Hellman, U., Soker, S., Klagsbrun, M., Eriksson, U. & Alitalo, K. 1999, "Differential binding of vascular endothelial growth factor B splice and proteolytic isoforms to neuropilin-1", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 274, no. 30, pp. 21217-21222. Makinen, T., Veikkola, T., Mustjoki, S., Karpanen, T., Catimel, B., Nice, E.C., Wise, L., Mercer, A., Kowalski, H., Kerjaschki, D., Stacker, S.A., Achen, M.G. & Alitalo, K. 2001, "Isolated lymphatic endothelial cells transduce growth, survival and migratory signals via the VEGF-C/D receptor VEGFR-3", The EMBO journal, vol. 20, no. 17, pp. 4762-4773. Makino, Y., Cao, R., Svensson, K., Bertilsson, G., Asman, M., Tanaka, H., Cao, Y., Berkenstam, A. & Poellinger, L. 2001, "Inhibitory PAS domain protein is a negative regulator of hypoxia-inducible gene expression", Nature, vol. 414, no. 6863, pp. 550-554. Martel, C., Li, W., Fulp, B., Platt, A.M., Gautier, E.L., Westerterp, M., Bittman, R., Tall, A.R., Chen, S.H., Thomas, M.J., Kreisel, D., Swartz, M.A., Sorci-Thomas, M.G. & Randolph, G.J. 2013, "Lymphatic vasculature mediates macrophage reverse cholesterol transport in mice", The Journal of clinical investigation, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 1571-1579. Maruyama, K., Ii, M., Cursiefen, C., Jackson, D.G., Keino, H., Tomita, M., Van Rooijen, N., Takenaka, H., D'Amore, P.A., Stein-Streilein, J., Losordo, D.W. & Streilein, J.W. 2005, "Inflammation-induced lymphangiogenesis in the cornea arises from CD11b-positive macrophages", The Journal of clinical investigation, vol. 115, no. 9, pp. 2363-2372. Masaki, I., Yonemitsu, Y., Yamashita, A., Sata, S., Tanii, M., Komori, K., Nakagawa, K., Hou, X., Nagai, Y., Hasegawa, M., Sugimachi, K. & Sueishi, K. 2002, "Angiogenic gene therapy for experimental critical limb ischemia: acceleration of limb loss by overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor 165 but not of fibroblast growth factor-2", Circulation research, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 966-973. Mastrangeli, A., Harvey, B.G., Yao, J., Wolff, G., Kovesdi, I., Crystal, R.G. & Falck-Pedersen, E. 1996, ""Sero-switch" adenovirus-mediated in vivo gene transfer: circumvention of anti-adenovirus humoral immune defenses 89 against repeat adenovirus vector administration by changing the adenovirus serotype", Human Gene Therapy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 79-87. Maxwell, P.H., Wiesener, M.S., Chang, G.W., Clifford, S.C., Vaux, E.C., Cockman, M.E., Wykoff, C.C., Pugh, C.W., Maher, E.R. & Ratcliffe, P.J. 1999, "The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis", Nature, vol. 399, no. 6733, pp. 271-275. McColl, B.K., Paavonen, K., Karnezis, T., Harris, N.C., Davydova, N., Rothacker, J., Nice, E.C., Harder, K.W., Roufail, S., Hibbs, M.L., Rogers, P.A., Alitalo, K., Stacker, S.A. & Achen, M.G. 2007, "Proprotein convertases promote processing of VEGF-D, a critical step for binding the angiogenic receptor VEGFR-2", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1088-1098. McDermott, M.M., Greenland, P., Liu, K., Guralnik, J.M., Celic, L., Criqui, M.H., Chan, C., Martin, G.J., Schneider, J., Pearce, W.H., Taylor, L.M. & Clark, E. 2002, "The ankle brachial index is associated with leg function and physical activity: the Walking and Leg Circulation Study", Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 136, no. 12, pp. 873-883. McIvor, J. 1980, "Changes in lymph node size induced by lymphography", Clinical radiology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 541544. McMahon, J.M., Wells, K.E., Bamfo, J.E., Cartwright, M.A. & Wells, D.J. 1998, "Inflammatory responses following direct injection of plasmid DNA into skeletal muscle", Gene therapy, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1283-1290. Mebius, R.E. 2003, "Organogenesis of lymphoid tissues", Nature reviews.Immunology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 292-303. Mebius, R.E., Streeter, P.R., Breve, J., Duijvestijn, A.M. & Kraal, G. 1991, "The influence of afferent lymphatic vessel interruption on vascular addressin expression", The Journal of cell biology, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 85-95. Mellor, R.H., Brice, G., Stanton, A.W., French, J., Smith, A., Jeffery, S., Levick, J.R., Burnand, K.G., Mortimer, P.S. & Lymphoedema Research Consortium 2007, "Mutations in FOXC2 are strongly associated with primary valve failure in veins of the lower limb", Circulation, vol. 115, no. 14, pp. 1912-1920. Mellor, R.H., Hubert, C.E., Stanton, A.W., Tate, N., Akhras, V., Smith, A., Burnand, K.G., Jeffery, S., Makinen, T., Levick, J.R. & Mortimer, P.S. 2010, "Lymphatic dysfunction, not aplasia, underlies Milroy disease", Microcirculation (New York, N.Y.: 1994), vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 281-296. Mendola, A., Schlogel, M.J., Ghalamkarpour, A., Irrthum, A., Nguyen, H.L., Fastre, E., Bygum, A., van der Vleuten, C., Fagerberg, C., Baselga, E., Quere, I., Mulliken, J.B., Boon, L.M., Brouillard, P., Vikkula, M. & Lymphedema Research Group 2013, "Mutations in the VEGFR3 signaling pathway explain 36% of familial lymphedema", Molecular syndromology, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 257-266. Migdal, M., Huppertz, B., Tessler, S., Comforti, A., Shibuya, M., Reich, R., Baumann, H. & Neufeld, G. 1998, "Neuropilin-1 is a placenta growth factor-2 receptor", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 273, no. 35, pp. 22272-22278. Minchenko, A., Bauer, T., Salceda, S. & Caro, J. 1994, "Hypoxic stimulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in vitro and in vivo", Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 374-379. Moslehi, J., Minamishima, Y.A., Shi, J., Neuberg, D., Charytan, D.M., Padera, R.F., Signoretti, S., Liao, R. & Kaelin, W.G.,Jr 2010, "Loss of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase activity in cardiomyocytes phenocopies ischemic cardiomyopathy", Circulation, vol. 122, no. 10, pp. 1004-1016. Mostbeck, A. & Partsch, H. 1999, "Isotope lymphography--possibilities and limits in evaluation of lymph transport", Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), vol. 149, no. 2-4, pp. 87-91. 90 Muller, A., Homey, B., Soto, H., Ge, N., Catron, D., Buchanan, M.E., McClanahan, T., Murphy, E., Yuan, W., Wagner, S.N., Barrera, J.L., Mohar, A., Verastegui, E. & Zlotnik, A. 2001, "Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis", Nature, vol. 410, no. 6824, pp. 50-56. Muona, K., Makinen, K., Hedman, M., Manninen, H. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2012, "10-year safety follow-up in patients with local VEGF gene transfer to ischemic lower limb", Gene therapy, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 392-395. Murdaca, G., Cagnati, P., Gulli, R., Spano, F., Puppo, F., Campisi, C. & Boccardo, F. 2012, "Current views on diagnostic approach and treatment of lymphedema", The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 134-140. Murtomaki, A., Uh, M.K., Choi, Y.K., Kitajewski, C., Borisenko, V., Kitajewski, J. & Shawber, C.J. 2013, "Notch1 functions as a negative regulator of lymphatic endothelial cell differentiation in the venous endothelium", Development (Cambridge, England), vol. 140, no. 11, pp. 2365-2376. Muthuchamy, M. & Zawieja, D. 2008, "Molecular regulation of lymphatic contractility", Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1131, pp. 89-99. Nagy, J.A., Vasile, E., Feng, D., Sundberg, C., Brown, L.F., Detmar, M.J., Lawitts, J.A., Benjamin, L., Tan, X., Manseau, E.J., Dvorak, A.M. & Dvorak, H.F. 2002, "Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor induces lymphangiogenesis as well as angiogenesis", The Journal of experimental medicine, vol. 196, no. 11, pp. 1497-1506. Nakamura, K., Radhakrishnan, K., Wong, Y.M. & Rockson, S.G. 2009, "Anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy with ketoprofen ameliorates experimental lymphatic vascular insufficiency in mice", PloS one, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. e8380. Nakano, T., Nakashima, Y., Yonemitsu, Y., Sumiyoshi, S., Chen, Y.X., Akishima, Y., Ishii, T., Iida, M. & Sueishi, K. 2005, "Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis and expression of lymphangiogenic factors in the atherosclerotic intima of human coronary arteries", Human pathology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 330-340. Natarajan, R., Salloum, F.N., Fisher, B.J., Kukreja, R.C. & Fowler, A.A.,3rd 2006, "Hypoxia inducible factor-1 activation by prolyl 4-hydroxylase-2 gene silencing attenuates myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury", Circulation research, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 133-140. Nelson, D. & Cox, M. 2008, Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 5th edition, W. H. Freeman. Newman, B., Lose, F., Kedda, M.A., Francois, M., Ferguson, K., Janda, M., Yates, P., Spurdle, A.B. & Hayes, S.C. 2012, "Possible genetic predisposition to lymphedema after breast cancer", Lymphatic research and biology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 2-13. Nilsson, I., Bahram, F., Li, X., Gualandi, L., Koch, S., Jarvius, M., Soderberg, O., Anisimov, A., Kholova, I., Pytowski, B., Baldwin, M., Yla-Herttuala, S., Alitalo, K., Kreuger, J. & Claesson-Welsh, L. 2010, "VEGF receptor 2/-3 heterodimers detected in situ by proximity ligation on angiogenic sprouts", The EMBO journal, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1377-1388. Norgren, L., Hiatt, W.R., Dormandy, J.A., Nehler, M.R., Harris, K.A., Fowkes, F.G. & TASC II Working Group 2007, "Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II)", Journal of vascular surgery : official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter, vol. 45 Suppl S, pp. S5-67. Norrmen, C., Ivanov, K.I., Cheng, J., Zangger, N., Delorenzi, M., Jaquet, M., Miura, N., Puolakkainen, P., Horsley, V., Hu, J., Augustin, H.G., Yla-Herttuala, S., Alitalo, K. & Petrova, T.V. 2009, "FOXC2 controls formation and maturation of lymphatic collecting vessels through cooperation with NFATc1", The Journal of cell biology, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 439-457. Norrmen, C., Tammela, T., Petrova, T.V. & Alitalo, K. 2011, "Biological basis of therapeutic lymphangiogenesis", Circulation, vol. 123, no. 12, pp. 1335-1351. 91 Nykanen, A.I., Sandelin, H., Krebs, R., Keranen, M.A., Tuuminen, R., Karpanen, T., Wu, Y., Pytowski, B., Koskinen, P.K., Yla-Herttuala, S., Alitalo, K. & Lemstrom, K.B. 2010, "Targeting lymphatic vessel activation and CCL21 production by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 inhibition has novel immunomodulatory and antiarteriosclerotic effects in cardiac allografts", Circulation, vol. 121, no. 12, pp. 1413-1422. O'Donnell, M.E., Reid, J.A., Lau, L.L., Hannon, R.J. & Lee, B. 2011, "Optimal management of peripheral arterial disease for the non-specialist", The Ulster medical journal, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 33-41. Ogawa, S., Oku, A., Sawano, A., Yamaguchi, S., Yazaki, Y. & Shibuya, M. 1998, "A novel type of vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF-E (NZ-7 VEGF), preferentially utilizes KDR/Flk-1 receptor and carries a potent mitotic activity without heparin-binding domain", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 273, no. 47, pp. 3127331282. Okamoto, N., Chihara, R., Shimizu, C., Nishimoto, S. & Watanabe, T. 2007, "Artificial lymph nodes induce potent secondary immune responses in naive and immunodeficient mice", The Journal of clinical investigation, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 997-1007. Olofsson, B., Pajusola, K., Kaipainen, A., von Euler, G., Joukov, V., Saksela, O., Orpana, A., Pettersson, R.F., Alitalo, K. & Eriksson, U. 1996a, "Vascular endothelial growth factor B, a novel growth factor for endothelial cells", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 25762581. Olofsson, B., Pajusola, K., von Euler, G., Chilov, D., Alitalo, K. & Eriksson, U. 1996b, "Genomic organization of the mouse and human genes for vascular endothelial growth factor B (VEGF-B) and characterization of a second splice isoform", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 271, no. 32, pp. 19310-19317. Oremus, M., Dayes, I., Walker, K. & Raina, P. 2012, "Systematic review: conservative treatments for secondary lymphedema", BMC cancer, vol. 12, pp. 6. Ostergaard, P., Simpson, M.A., Brice, G., Mansour, S., Connell, F.C., Onoufriadis, A., Child, A.H., Hwang, J., Kalidas, K., Mortimer, P.S., Trembath, R. & Jeffery, S. 2011a, "Rapid identification of mutations in GJC2 in primary lymphoedema using whole exome sequencing combined with linkage analysis with delineation of the phenotype", Journal of medical genetics, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 251-255. Ostergaard, P., Simpson, M.A., Connell, F.C., Steward, C.G., Brice, G., Woollard, W.J., Dafou, D., Kilo, T., Smithson, S., Lunt, P., Murday, V.A., Hodgson, S., Keenan, R., Pilz, D.T., Martinez-Corral, I., Makinen, T., Mortimer, P.S., Jeffery, S., Trembath, R.C. & Mansour, S. 2011b, "Mutations in GATA2 cause primary lymphedema associated with a predisposition to acute myeloid leukemia (Emberger syndrome)", Nature genetics, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 929-931. Ostergaard, P., Simpson, M.A., Mendola, A., Vasudevan, P., Connell, F.C., van Impel, A., Moore, A.T., Loeys, B.L., Ghalamkarpour, A., Onoufriadis, A., Martinez-Corral, I., Devery, S., Leroy, J.G., van Laer, L., Singer, A., Bialer, M.G., McEntagart, M., Quarrell, O., Brice, G., Trembath, R.C., Schulte-Merker, S., Makinen, T., Vikkula, M., Mortimer, P.S., Mansour, S. & Jeffery, S. 2012, "Mutations in KIF11 cause autosomal-dominant microcephaly variably associated with congenital lymphedema and chorioretinopathy", American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 356-362. O'Toole, L. & Grech, E.D. 2003, "Chronic stable angina: treatment options", BMJ (Clinical research ed.), vol. 326, no. 7400, pp. 1185-1188. Ottesen, E.A., Duke, B.O., Karam, M. & Behbehani, K. 1997, "Strategies and tools for the control/elimination of lymphatic filariasis", Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 491-503. Ottesen, E.A., Hooper, P.J., Bradley, M. & Biswas, G. 2008, "The global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis: health impact after 8 years", PLoS neglected tropical diseases, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. e317. 92 Paavonen, K., Puolakkainen, P., Jussila, L., Jahkola, T. & Alitalo, K. 2000, "Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 in lymphangiogenesis in wound healing", The American journal of pathology, vol. 156, no. 5, pp. 1499-1504. Pajusola, K., Kunnapuu, J., Vuorikoski, S., Soronen, J., Andre, H., Pereira, T., Korpisalo, P., Yla-Herttuala, S., Poellinger, L. & Alitalo, K. 2005, "Stabilized HIF-1alpha is superior to VEGF for angiogenesis in skeletal muscle via adeno-associated virus gene transfer", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1365-1367. Pan, Q., Chanthery, Y., Liang, W.C., Stawicki, S., Mak, J., Rathore, N., Tong, R.K., Kowalski, J., Yee, S.F., Pacheco, G., Ross, S., Cheng, Z., Le Couter, J., Plowman, G., Peale, F., Koch, A.W., Wu, Y., Bagri, A., Tessier-Lavigne, M. & Watts, R.J. 2007, "Blocking neuropilin-1 function has an additive effect with anti-VEGF to inhibit tumor growth", Cancer cell, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 53-67. Pande, R.L., Hiatt, W.R., Zhang, P., Hittel, N. & Creager, M.A. 2010, "A pooled analysis of the durability and predictors of treatment response of cilostazol in patients with intermittent claudication", Vascular medicine (London, England), vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 181-188. Papandreou, I., Cairns, R.A., Fontana, L., Lim, A.L. & Denko, N.C. 2006, "HIF-1 mediates adaptation to hypoxia by actively downregulating mitochondrial oxygen consumption", Cell metabolism, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 187-197. Pappas, G.P., Olcott, E.W. & Drace, J.E. 2001, "Imaging of skeletal muscle function using (18)FDG PET: force production, activation, and metabolism", Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985), vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 329-337. Park, J.E., Chen, H.H., Winer, J., Houck, K.A. & Ferrara, N. 1994, "Placenta growth factor. Potentiation of vascular endothelial growth factor bioactivity, in vitro and in vivo, and high affinity binding to Flt-1 but not to Flk1/KDR", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 269, no. 41, pp. 25646-25654. Partanen, T.A., Alitalo, K. & Miettinen, M. 1999, "Lack of lymphatic vascular specificity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in 185 vascular tumors", Cancer, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2406-2412. Partanen, T.A., Arola, J., Saaristo, A., Jussila, L., Ora, A., Miettinen, M., Stacker, S.A., Achen, M.G. & Alitalo, K. 2000, "VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression in neuroendocrine cells and their receptor, VEGFR-3, in fenestrated blood vessels in human tissues", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 2087-2096. Patel, T.H., Kimura, H., Weiss, C.R., Semenza, G.L. & Hofmann, L.V. 2005, "Constitutively active HIF-1alpha improves perfusion and arterial remodeling in an endovascular model of limb ischemia", Cardiovascular research, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 144-154. Persson, A.B. & Buschmann, I.R. 2011, "Vascular growth in health and disease", Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, vol. 4, pp. 14. Petrova, T.V., Karpanen, T., Norrmen, C., Mellor, R., Tamakoshi, T., Finegold, D., Ferrell, R., Kerjaschki, D., Mortimer, P., Yla-Herttuala, S., Miura, N. & Alitalo, K. 2004, "Defective valves and abnormal mural cell recruitment underlie lymphatic vascular failure in lymphedema distichiasis", Nature medicine, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 974-981. Pfarr, K.M., Debrah, A.Y., Specht, S. & Hoerauf, A. 2009, "Filariasis and lymphoedema", Parasite immunology, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 664-672. Pflicke, H. & Sixt, M. 2009, "Preformed portals facilitate dendritic cell entry into afferent lymphatic vessels", The Journal of experimental medicine, vol. 206, no. 13, pp. 2925-2935. Phillips, P. & Gardner, E. 2004, "Contrast-agent detection and quantification", European radiology, vol. 14 Suppl 8, pp. P4-10. 93 Pipp, F., Heil, M., Issbrucker, K., Ziegelhoeffer, T., Martin, S., van den Heuvel, J., Weich, H., Fernandez, B., Golomb, G., Carmeliet, P., Schaper, W. & Clauss, M. 2003, "VEGFR-1-selective VEGF homologue PlGF is arteriogenic: evidence for a monocyte-mediated mechanism", Circulation research, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 378-385. Planas-Paz, L., Strilic, B., Goedecke, A., Breier, G., Fassler, R. & Lammert, E. 2012, "Mechanoinduction of lymph vessel expansion", The EMBO journal, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 788-804. Potente, M., Gerhardt, H. & Carmeliet, P. 2011, "Basic and therapeutic aspects of angiogenesis", Cell, vol. 146, no. 6, pp. 873-887. Price, R.J., Less, J.R., Van Gieson, E.J. & Skalak, T.C. 2002, "Hemodynamic stresses and structural remodeling of anastomosing arteriolar networks: design principles of collateral arterioles", Microcirculation (New York, N.Y.: 1994), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 111-124. Prompers, J.J., Jeneson, J.A., Drost, M.R., Oomens, C.C., Strijkers, G.J. & Nicolay, K. 2006, "Dynamic MRS and MRI of skeletal muscle function and biomechanics", NMR in biomedicine, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 927-953. Quetglas, J.I., Ruiz-Guillen, M., Aranda, A., Casales, E., Bezunartea, J. & Smerdou, C. 2010, "Alphavirus vectors for cancer therapy", Virus research, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 179-196. Quinn, T.P., Peters, K.G., De Vries, C., Ferrara, N. & Williams, L.T. 1993, "Fetal liver kinase 1 is a receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor and is selectively expressed in vascular endothelium", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 16, pp. 7533-7537. Rabson, J.A., Geyer, S.J., Levine, G., Swartz, W.M. & Futrell, J.W. 1982, "Tumor immunity in rat lymph nodes following transplantation", Annals of Surgery, vol. 196, no. 1, pp. 92-99. Rajagopalan, S., Mohler, E.R.,3rd, Lederman, R.J., Mendelsohn, F.O., Saucedo, J.F., Goldman, C.K., Blebea, J., Macko, J., Kessler, P.D., Rasmussen, H.S. & Annex, B.H. 2003, "Regional angiogenesis with vascular endothelial growth factor in peripheral arterial disease: a phase II randomized, double-blind, controlled study of adenoviral delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor 121 in patients with disabling intermittent claudication", Circulation, vol. 108, no. 16, pp. 1933-1938. Rajagopalan, S., Olin, J., Deitcher, S., Pieczek, A., Laird, J., Grossman, P.M., Goldman, C.K., McEllin, K., Kelly, R. & Chronos, N. 2007, "Use of a constitutively active hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha transgene as a therapeutic strategy in no-option critical limb ischemia patients: phase I dose-escalation experience", Circulation, vol. 115, no. 10, pp. 1234-1243. Randall, T.D., Carragher, D.M. & Rangel-Moreno, J. 2008, "Development of secondary lymphoid organs", Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 26, pp. 627-650. Ranjan, A.K., Kumar, U., Hardikar, A.A., Poddar, P., Nair, P.D. & Hardikar, A.A. 2009, "Human blood vessel-derived endothelial progenitors for endothelialization of small diameter vascular prosthesis", PloS one, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. e7718. Raper, S.E., Chirmule, N., Lee, F.S., Wivel, N.A., Bagg, A., Gao, G.P., Wilson, J.M. & Batshaw, M.L. 2003, "Fatal systemic inflammatory response syndrome in a ornithine transcarbamylase deficient patient following adenoviral gene transfer", Molecular genetics and metabolism, vol. 80, no. 1-2, pp. 148-158. Rehman, J. 2008, "An inconvenient truth: recognizing individual differences in arteriogenesis", Circulation research, vol. 102, no. 10, pp. 1146-1147. Rehman, J., Li, J., Orschell, C.M. & March, K.L. 2003, "Peripheral blood "endothelial progenitor cells" are derived from monocyte/macrophages and secrete angiogenic growth factors", Circulation, vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 11641169. Religa, P., Cao, R., Bjorndahl, M., Zhou, Z., Zhu, Z. & Cao, Y. 2005, "Presence of bone marrow-derived circulating progenitor endothelial cells in the newly formed lymphatic vessels", Blood, vol. 106, no. 13, pp. 4184-4190. 94 Resnick, N., Yahav, H., Shay-Salit, A., Shushy, M., Schubert, S., Zilberman, L.C. & Wofovitz, E. 2003, "Fluid shear stress and the vascular endothelium: for better and for worse", Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 177-199. Reynolds, L.P., Killilea, S.D. & Redmer, D.A. 1992, "Angiogenesis in the female reproductive system", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 886-892. Ribatti, D. & Crivellato, E. 2012, ""Sprouting angiogenesis", a reappraisal", Developmental biology, vol. 372, no. 2, pp. 157-165. Risau, W. 1997, "Mechanisms of angiogenesis", Nature, vol. 386, no. 6626, pp. 671-674. Risau, W. 1995, "Differentiation of endothelium", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 926-933. Risau, W. & Flamme, I. 1995, "Vasculogenesis", Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 11, pp. 7391. Rissanen, T.T., Korpisalo, P., Karvinen, H., Liimatainen, T., Laidinen, S., Grohn, O.H. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2008, "Highresolution ultrasound perfusion imaging of therapeutic angiogenesis", JACC.Cardiovascular imaging, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83-91. Rissanen, T.T., Korpisalo, P., Markkanen, J.E., Liimatainen, T., Orden, M.R., Kholova, I., de Goede, A., Heikura, T., Grohn, O.H. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2005, "Blood flow remodels growing vasculature during vascular endothelial growth factor gene therapy and determines between capillary arterialization and sprouting angiogenesis", Circulation, vol. 112, no. 25, pp. 3937-3946. Rissanen, T.T., Markkanen, J.E., Arve, K., Rutanen, J., Kettunen, M.I., Vajanto, I., Jauhiainen, S., Cashion, L., Gruchala, M., Narvanen, O., Taipale, P., Kauppinen, R.A., Rubanyi, G.M. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2003a, "Fibroblast growth factor 4 induces vascular permeability, angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in a rabbit hindlimb ischemia model", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 100-102. Rissanen, T.T., Markkanen, J.E., Gruchala, M., Heikura, T., Puranen, A., Kettunen, M.I., Kholova, I., Kauppinen, R.A., Achen, M.G., Stacker, S.A., Alitalo, K. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2003b, "VEGF-D is the strongest angiogenic and lymphangiogenic effector among VEGFs delivered into skeletal muscle via adenoviruses", Circulation research, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 1098-1106. Rivard, A., Berthou-Soulie, L., Principe, N., Kearney, M., Curry, C., Branellec, D., Semenza, G.L. & Isner, J.M. 2000, "Age-dependent defect in vascular endothelial growth factor expression is associated with reduced hypoxiainducible factor 1 activity", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 275, no. 38, pp. 29643-29647. Rockson, S.G. 2001, "Lymphedema", The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 288-295. Rockson, S.G. & Rivera, K.K. 2008, "Estimating the population burden of lymphedema", Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1131, pp. 147-154. Rowe, W.P., Huebner, R.J., Gilmore, L.K., Parrott, R.H. & Ward, T.G. 1953, "Isolation of a cytopathogenic agent from human adenoids undergoing spontaneous degeneration in tissue culture", Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine (New York, N.Y.), vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 570-573. Roy, H., Bhardwaj, S., Babu, M., Jauhiainen, S., Herzig, K.H., Bellu, A.R., Haisma, H.J., Carmeliet, P., Alitalo, K. & YlaHerttuala, S. 2005, "Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of placental growth factor to perivascular tissue induces angiogenesis via upregulation of the expression of endogenous vascular endothelial growth factorA", Human Gene Therapy, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1422-1428. 95 Rutanen, J., Rissanen, T.T., Markkanen, J.E., Gruchala, M., Silvennoinen, P., Kivela, A., Hedman, A., Hedman, M., Heikura, T., Orden, M.R., Stacker, S.A., Achen, M.G., Hartikainen, J. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2004, "Adenoviral catheter-mediated intramyocardial gene transfer using the mature form of vascular endothelial growth factor-D induces transmural angiogenesis in porcine heart", Circulation, vol. 109, no. 8, pp. 1029-1035. Rutkowski, J.M., Moya, M., Johannes, J., Goldman, J. & Swartz, M.A. 2006, "Secondary lymphedema in the mouse tail: Lymphatic hyperplasia, VEGF-C upregulation, and the protective role of MMP-9", Microvascular research, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 161-171. Saaristo, A., Veikkola, T., Enholm, B., Hytonen, M., Arola, J., Pajusola, K., Turunen, P., Jeltsch, M., Karkkainen, M.J., Kerjaschki, D., Bueler, H., Yla-Herttuala, S. & Alitalo, K. 2002a, "Adenoviral VEGF-C overexpression induces blood vessel enlargement, tortuosity, and leakiness but no sprouting angiogenesis in the skin or mucous membranes", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1041-1049. Saaristo, A., Veikkola, T., Tammela, T., Enholm, B., Karkkainen, M.J., Pajusola, K., Bueler, H., Yla-Herttuala, S. & Alitalo, K. 2002b, "Lymphangiogenic gene therapy with minimal blood vascular side effects", The Journal of experimental medicine, vol. 196, no. 6, pp. 719-730. Saaristo, A.M., Niemi, T.S., Viitanen, T.P., Tervala, T.V., Hartiala, P. & Suominen, E.A. 2012, "Microvascular breast reconstruction and lymph node transfer for postmastectomy lymphedema patients", Annals of Surgery, vol. 255, no. 3, pp. 468-473. Salameh, A., Galvagni, F., Bardelli, M., Bussolino, F. & Oliviero, S. 2005, "Direct recruitment of CRK and GRB2 to VEGFR-3 induces proliferation, migration, and survival of endothelial cells through the activation of ERK, AKT, and JNK pathways", Blood, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 3423-3431. Schaper, J., Konig, R., Franz, D. & Schaper, W. 1976, "The endothelial surface of growing coronary collateral arteries. Intimal margination and diapedesis of monocytes. A combined SEM and TEM study", Virchows Archiv.A, Pathological anatomy and histology, vol. 370, no. 3, pp. 193-205. Schaper, W. & Scholz, D. 2003, "Factors regulating arteriogenesis", Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1143-1151. Schindewolffs, L., Breves, G., Buettner, M., Hadamitzky, C. & Pabst, R. 2014, "VEGF-C improves regeneration and lymphatic reconnection of transplanted autologous lymph node fragments: An animal model for secondary lymphedema treatment", Immunity, inflammation and disease, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 152-161. Schnell, M.A., Zhang, Y., Tazelaar, J., Gao, G.P., Yu, Q.C., Qian, R., Chen, S.J., Varnavski, A.N., LeClair, C., Raper, S.E. & Wilson, J.M. 2001, "Activation of innate immunity in nonhuman primates following intraportal administration of adenoviral vectors", Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, vol. 3, no. 5 Pt 1, pp. 708-722. Scholz, D., Ito, W., Fleming, I., Deindl, E., Sauer, A., Wiesnet, M., Busse, R., Schaper, J. & Schaper, W. 2000, "Ultrastructure and molecular histology of rabbit hind-limb collateral artery growth (arteriogenesis)", Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, vol. 436, no. 3, pp. 257-270. Schulte-Merker, S., Sabine, A. & Petrova, T.V. 2011, "Lymphatic vascular morphogenesis in development, physiology, and disease", The Journal of cell biology, vol. 193, no. 4, pp. 607-618. Scoggins, C.R., Chagpar, A.B., Martin, R.C. & McMasters, K.M. 2005, "Should sentinel lymph-node biopsy be used routinely for staging melanoma and breast cancers?", Nature clinical practice.Oncology, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 448455. Semenza, G.L. 2014, "Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and cardiovascular disease", Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 76, pp. 39-56. Semenza, G.L. 2012, "Hypoxia-inducible factors in physiology and medicine", Cell, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 399-408. 96 Semenza, G.L. 2010, "Defining the role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in cancer biology and therapeutics", Oncogene, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 625-634. Semenza, G.L., Jiang, B.H., Leung, S.W., Passantino, R., Concordet, J.P., Maire, P. & Giallongo, A. 1996, "Hypoxia response elements in the aldolase A, enolase 1, and lactate dehydrogenase A gene promoters contain essential binding sites for hypoxia-inducible factor 1", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 271, no. 51, pp. 32529-32537. Serruys, P.W., Morice, M.C., Kappetein, A.P., Colombo, A., Holmes, D.R., Mack, M.J., Stahle, E., Feldman, T.E., van den Brand, M., Bass, E.J., Van Dyck, N., Leadley, K., Dawkins, K.D., Mohr, F.W. & SYNTAX Investigators 2009, "Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease", The New England journal of medicine, vol. 360, no. 10, pp. 961-972. Seyama, K., Kumasaka, T., Kurihara, M., Mitani, K. & Sato, T. 2010, "Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a disease involving the lymphatic system", Lymphatic research and biology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21-31. Shalaby, F., Rossant, J., Yamaguchi, T.P., Gertsenstein, M., Wu, X.F., Breitman, M.L. & Schuh, A.C. 1995, "Failure of blood-island formation and vasculogenesis in Flk-1-deficient mice", Nature, vol. 376, no. 6535, pp. 62-66. Sharma, A., Li, X., Bangari, D.S. & Mittal, S.K. 2009a, "Adenovirus receptors and their implications in gene delivery", Virus research, vol. 143, no. 2, pp. 184-194. Sharma, A., Tandon, M., Bangari, D.S. & Mittal, S.K. 2009b, "Adenoviral vector-based strategies for cancer therapy", Current drug therapy, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 117-138. Shin, W.S., Szuba, A. & Rockson, S.G. 2003, "Animal models for the study of lymphatic insufficiency", Lymphatic research and biology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 159-169. Simon, R.H., Engelhardt, J.F., Yang, Y., Zepeda, M., Weber-Pendleton, S., Grossman, M. & Wilson, J.M. 1993, "Adenovirus-mediated transfer of the CFTR gene to lung of nonhuman primates: toxicity study", Human Gene Therapy, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 771-780. Simons, M., Bonow, R.O., Chronos, N.A., Cohen, D.J., Giordano, F.J., Hammond, H.K., Laham, R.J., Li, W., Pike, M., Sellke, F.W., Stegmann, T.J., Udelson, J.E. & Rosengart, T.K. 2000, "Clinical trials in coronary angiogenesis: issues, problems, consensus: An expert panel summary", Circulation, vol. 102, no. 11, pp. E73-86. Singh, N., Tiem, M., Watkins, R., Cho, Y.K., Wang, Y., Olsen, T., Uehara, H., Mamalis, C., Luo, L., Oakey, Z. & Ambati, B.K. 2013, "Soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 is essential for corneal alymphaticity", Blood, vol. 121, no. 20, pp. 4242-4249. Skobe, M., Hawighorst, T., Jackson, D.G., Prevo, R., Janes, L., Velasco, P., Riccardi, L., Alitalo, K., Claffey, K. & Detmar, M. 2001, "Induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis by VEGF-C promotes breast cancer metastasis", Nature medicine, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 192-198. Sleeman, J.P. & Thiele, W. 2009, "Tumor metastasis and the lymphatic vasculature", International journal of cancer.Journal international du cancer, vol. 125, no. 12, pp. 2747-2756. Smeltzer, D.M., Stickler, G.B. & Schirger, A. 1985, "Primary lymphedema in children and adolescents: a follow-up study and review", Pediatrics, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 206-218. Soker, S., Takashima, S., Miao, H.Q., Neufeld, G. & Klagsbrun, M. 1998, "Neuropilin-1 is expressed by endothelial and tumor cells as an isoform-specific receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor", Cell, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 735-745. Sommer, T., Buettner, M., Bruns, F., Breves, G., Hadamitzky, C. & Pabst, R. 2012, "Improved regeneration of autologous transplanted lymph node fragments by VEGF-C treatment", Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J.: 2007), vol. 295, no. 5, pp. 786-791. 97 Springer, M.L., Sievers, R.E., Viswanathan, M.N., Yee, M.S., Foster, E., Grossman, W. & Yeghiazarians, Y. 2005, "Closed-chest cell injections into mouse myocardium guided by high-resolution echocardiography", American journal of physiology.Heart and circulatory physiology, vol. 289, no. 3, pp. H1307-14. Srinivasan, R.S., Escobedo, N., Yang, Y., Interiano, A., Dillard, M.E., Finkelstein, D., Mukatira, S., Gil, H.J., Nurmi, H., Alitalo, K. & Oliver, G. 2014, "The Prox1-Vegfr3 feedback loop maintains the identity and the number of lymphatic endothelial cell progenitors", Genes & development, vol. 28, no. 19, pp. 2175-2187. Srinivasan, R.S., Geng, X., Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Mukatira, S., Studer, M., Porto, M.P., Lagutin, O. & Oliver, G. 2010, "The nuclear hormone receptor Coup-TFII is required for the initiation and early maintenance of Prox1 expression in lymphatic endothelial cells", Genes & development, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 696-707. Srinivasan, R.S. & Oliver, G. 2011, "Prox1 dosage controls the number of lymphatic endothelial cell progenitors and the formation of the lymphovenous valves", Genes & development, vol. 25, no. 20, pp. 2187-2197. Stacker, S.A., Stenvers, K., Caesar, C., Vitali, A., Domagala, T., Nice, E., Roufail, S., Simpson, R.J., Moritz, R., Karpanen, T., Alitalo, K. & Achen, M.G. 1999, "Biosynthesis of vascular endothelial growth factor-D involves proteolytic processing which generates non-covalent homodimers", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 274, no. 45, pp. 32127-32136. Stanton, A.W., Modi, S., Bennett Britton, T.M., Purushotham, A.D., Peters, A.M., Levick, J.R. & Mortimer, P.S. 2009a, "Lymphatic drainage in the muscle and subcutis of the arm after breast cancer treatment", Breast cancer research and treatment, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 549-557. Stanton, A.W., Modi, S., Mellor, R.H., Levick, J.R. & Mortimer, P.S. 2009b, "Recent advances in breast cancerrelated lymphedema of the arm: lymphatic pump failure and predisposing factors", Lymphatic research and biology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 29-45. Styp-Rekowska, B., Hlushchuk, R., Pries, A.R. & Djonov, V. 2011, "Intussusceptive angiogenesis: pillars against the blood flow", Acta physiologica (Oxford, England), vol. 202, no. 3, pp. 213-223. Suami, H. & Chang, D.W. 2010, "Overview of surgical treatments for breast cancer-related lymphedema", Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 1853-1863. Suominen, E., Toivonen, R., Grenman, R. & Savontaus, M. 2006, "Head and neck cancer cells are efficiently infected by Ad5/35 hybrid virus", The journal of gene medicine, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1223-1231. Syvaranta, S., Helske, S., Lappalainen, J., Kupari, M. & Kovanen, P.T. 2012, "Lymphangiogenesis in aortic valve stenosis--novel regulatory roles for valvular myofibroblasts and mast cells", Atherosclerosis, vol. 221, no. 2, pp. 366-374. Szuba, A. & Rockson, S.G. 1998, "Lymphedema: classification, diagnosis and therapy", Vascular medicine (London, England), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 145-156. Szuba, A., Shin, W.S., Strauss, H.W. & Rockson, S. 2003, "The third circulation: radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphedema", Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 43-57. Szuba, A., Skobe, M., Karkkainen, M.J., Shin, W.S., Beynet, D.P., Rockson, N.B., Dakhil, N., Spilman, S., Goris, M.L., Strauss, H.W., Quertermous, T., Alitalo, K. & Rockson, S.G. 2002, "Therapeutic lymphangiogenesis with human recombinant VEGF-C", The FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 16, no. 14, pp. 1985-1987. Takeda, N., Maemura, K., Imai, Y., Harada, T., Kawanami, D., Nojiri, T., Manabe, I. & Nagai, R. 2004, "Endothelial PAS domain protein 1 gene promotes angiogenesis through the transactivation of both vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, Flt-1", Circulation research, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 146-153. 98 Takeshita, S., Weir, L., Chen, D., Zheng, L.P., Riessen, R., Bauters, C., Symes, J.F., Ferrara, N. & Isner, J.M. 1996, "Therapeutic angiogenesis following arterial gene transfer of vascular endothelial growth factor in a rabbit model of hindlimb ischemia", Biochemical and biophysical research communications, vol. 227, no. 2, pp. 628635. Tammela, T. & Alitalo, K. 2010, "Lymphangiogenesis: Molecular mechanisms and future promise", Cell, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 460-476. Tammela, T., Enholm, B., Alitalo, K. & Paavonen, K. 2005, "The biology of vascular endothelial growth factors", Cardiovascular research, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 550-563. Tammela, T., Saaristo, A., Holopainen, T., Lyytikka, J., Kotronen, A., Pitkonen, M., Abo-Ramadan, U., Yla-Herttuala, S., Petrova, T.V. & Alitalo, K. 2007, "Therapeutic differentiation and maturation of lymphatic vessels after lymph node dissection and transplantation", Nature medicine, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1458-1466. Tammela, T., Saaristo, A., Lohela, M., Morisada, T., Tornberg, J., Norrmen, C., Oike, Y., Pajusola, K., Thurston, G., Suda, T., Yla-Herttuala, S. & Alitalo, K. 2005, "Angiopoietin-1 promotes lymphatic sprouting and hyperplasia", Blood, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 4642-4648. Tang, G.L., Chang, D.S., Sarkar, R., Wang, R. & Messina, L.M. 2005, "The effect of gradual or acute arterial occlusion on skeletal muscle blood flow, arteriogenesis, and inflammation in rat hindlimb ischemia", Journal of vascular surgery, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 312-320. Tervala, T.V., Hartiala, P., Tammela, T., Visuri, M.T., Yla-Herttuala, S., Alitalo, K. & Saarikko, A.M. 2015, "Growth factor therapy and lymph node graft for lymphedema", The Journal of surgical research, . Thomas, C.E., Birkett, D., Anozie, I., Castro, M.G. & Lowenstein, P.R. 2001, "Acute direct adenoviral vector cytotoxicity and chronic, but not acute, inflammatory responses correlate with decreased vector-mediated transgene expression in the brain", Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 36-46. Thurston, G., Suri, C., Smith, K., McClain, J., Sato, T.N., Yancopoulos, G.D. & McDonald, D.M. 1999, "Leakageresistant blood vessels in mice transgenically overexpressing angiopoietin-1", Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 286, no. 5449, pp. 2511-2514. Tian, H., Hammer, R.E., Matsumoto, A.M., Russell, D.W. & McKnight, S.L. 1998, "The hypoxia-responsive transcription factor EPAS1 is essential for catecholamine homeostasis and protection against heart failure during embryonic development", Genes & development, vol. 12, no. 21, pp. 3320-3324. Tian, H., McKnight, S.L. & Russell, D.W. 1997, "Endothelial PAS domain protein 1 (EPAS1), a transcription factor selectively expressed in endothelial cells", Genes & development, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 72-82. Tobbia, D., Semple, J., Baker, A., Dumont, D. & Johnston, M. 2009, "Experimental assessment of autologous lymph node transplantation as treatment of postsurgical lymphedema", Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 777-786. Touzot, F., Hacein-Bey-Abina, S., Fischer, A. & Cavazzana, M. 2014, "Gene therapy for inherited immunodeficiency", Expert opinion on biological therapy, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 789-798. Troidl, K. & Schaper, W. 2012, "Arteriogenesis versus angiogenesis in peripheral artery disease", Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, vol. 28 Suppl 1, pp. 27-29. Trzewik, J., Mallipattu, S.K., Artmann, G.M., Delano, F.A. & Schmid-Schonbein, G.W. 2001, "Evidence for a second valve system in lymphatics: endothelial microvalves", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1711-1717. Tvorogov, D., Anisimov, A., Zheng, W., Leppanen, V.M., Tammela, T., Laurinavicius, S., Holnthoner, W., Helotera, H., Holopainen, T., Jeltsch, M., Kalkkinen, N., Lankinen, H., Ojala, P.M. & Alitalo, K. 2010, "Effective 99 suppression of vascular network formation by combination of antibodies blocking VEGFR ligand binding and receptor dimerization", Cancer cell, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 630-640. Uniewicz, K.A. & Fernig, D.G. 2008, "Neuropilins: a versatile partner of extracellular molecules that regulate development and disease", Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library, vol. 13, pp. 4339-4360. van de Pavert, S.A. & Mebius, R.E. 2010, "New insights into the development of lymphoid tissues", Nature reviews.Immunology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 664-674. Van den Eynden, G.G., Van der Auwera, I., Van Laere, S.J., Huygelen, V., Colpaert, C.G., van Dam, P., Dirix, L.Y., Vermeulen, P.B. & Van Marck, E.A. 2006, "Induction of lymphangiogenesis in and around axillary lymph node metastases of patients with breast cancer", British journal of cancer, vol. 95, no. 10, pp. 1362-1366. van Steensel, M.A., Damstra, R.J., Heitink, M.V., Bladergroen, R.S., Veraart, J., Steijlen, P.M. & van Geel, M. 2009, "Novel missense mutations in the FOXC2 gene alter transcriptional activity", Human mutation, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. E1002-9. Vannucci, L., Lai, M., Chiuppesi, F., Ceccherini-Nelli, L. & Pistello, M. 2013, "Viral vectors: a look back and ahead on gene transfer technology", The new microbiologica, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1-22. Veikkola, T., Jussila, L., Makinen, T., Karpanen, T., Jeltsch, M., Petrova, T.V., Kubo, H., Thurston, G., McDonald, D.M., Achen, M.G., Stacker, S.A. & Alitalo, K. 2001, "Signalling via vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 is sufficient for lymphangiogenesis in transgenic mice", The EMBO journal, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 12231231. Verma, I.M. & Weitzman, M.D. 2005, "Gene therapy: twenty-first century medicine", Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 74, pp. 711-738. Viitanen, T.P., Visuri, M.T., Hartiala, P., Maki, M.T., Seppanen, M.P., Suominen, E.A. & Saaristo, A.M. 2013, "Lymphatic vessel function and lymphatic growth factor secretion after microvascular lymph node transfer in lymphedema patients", Plastic and reconstructive surgery.Global open, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1-9. Vincent, K.A., Feron, O. & Kelly, R.A. 2002, "Harnessing the response to tissue hypoxia: HIF-1 alpha and therapeutic angiogenesis", Trends in cardiovascular medicine, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 362-367. Vincent, K.A., Shyu, K.G., Luo, Y., Magner, M., Tio, R.A., Jiang, C., Goldberg, M.A., Akita, G.Y., Gregory, R.J. & Isner, J.M. 2000, "Angiogenesis is induced in a rabbit model of hindlimb ischemia by naked DNA encoding an HIF1alpha/VP16 hybrid transcription factor", Circulation, vol. 102, no. 18, pp. 2255-2261. Vondenhoff, M.F., van de Pavert, S.A., Dillard, M.E., Greuter, M., Goverse, G., Oliver, G. & Mebius, R.E. 2009, "Lymph sacs are not required for the initiation of lymph node formation", Development (Cambridge, England), vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 29-34. Vuorio, T., Nurmi, H., Moulton, K., Kurkipuro, J., Robciuc, M.R., Ohman, M., Heinonen, S.E., Samaranayake, H., Heikura, T., Alitalo, K. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2014, "Lymphatic vessel insufficiency in hypercholesterolemic mice alters lipoprotein levels and promotes atherogenesis", Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1162-1170. Wacker, A. & Gerhardt, H. 2011, "Endothelial development taking shape", Current opinion in cell biology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 676-685. Wally, V., Murauer, E.M. & Bauer, J.W. 2012, "Spliceosome-mediated trans-splicing: the therapeutic cut and paste", The Journal of investigative dermatology, vol. 132, no. 8, pp. 1959-1966. Wang, G.L., Jiang, B.H., Rue, E.A. & Semenza, G.L. 1995, "Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular O2 tension", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 5510-5514. 100 Warren, A.G., Brorson, H., Borud, L.J. & Slavin, S.A. 2007, "Lymphedema: a comprehensive review", Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 464-472. Weis, S.M. & Cheresh, D.A. 2005, "Pathophysiological consequences of VEGF-induced vascular permeability", Nature, vol. 437, no. 7058, pp. 497-504. Werner, N., Kosiol, S., Schiegl, T., Ahlers, P., Walenta, K., Link, A., Bohm, M. & Nickenig, G. 2005, "Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and cardiovascular outcomes", The New England journal of medicine, vol. 353, no. 10, pp. 999-1007. WHO 2014, May, 2014-last update, The Top Ten Causes of Death 2012 [Homepage of WHO], [Online]. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/. Wiesener, M.S., Jurgensen, J.S., Rosenberger, C., Scholze, C.K., Horstrup, J.H., Warnecke, C., Mandriota, S., Bechmann, I., Frei, U.A., Pugh, C.W., Ratcliffe, P.J., Bachmann, S., Maxwell, P.H. & Eckardt, K.U. 2003, "Widespread hypoxia-inducible expression of HIF-2alpha in distinct cell populations of different organs", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 271-273. Wigle, J.T. & Oliver, G. 1999, "Prox1 function is required for the development of the murine lymphatic system", Cell, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 769-778. Willard-Mack, C.L. 2006, "Normal structure, function, and histology of lymph nodes", Toxicologic pathology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 409-424. Williams, D.A. 2007, "RAC reviews serious adverse event associated with AAV therapy trial", Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 2053-2054. Wilting, J., Neeff, H. & Christ, B. 1999, "Embryonic lymphangiogenesis", Cell and tissue research, vol. 297, no. 1, pp. 1-11. Wirth, T., Parker, N. & Yla-Herttuala, S. 2013, "History of gene therapy", Gene, vol. 525, no. 2, pp. 162-169. Witte, M.H. & Witte, C.L. 1987, "Lymphatics and blood vessels, lymphangiogenesis and hemangiogenesis: from cell biology to clinical medicine", Lymphology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 257-266. Worgall, S., Wolff, G., Falck-Pedersen, E. & Crystal, R.G. 1997, "Innate immune mechanisms dominate elimination of adenoviral vectors following in vivo administration", Human Gene Therapy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 37-44. Wustmann, K., Zbinden, S., Windecker, S., Meier, B. & Seiler, C. 2003, "Is there functional collateral flow during vascular occlusion in angiographically normal coronary arteries?", Circulation, vol. 107, no. 17, pp. 22132220. Xiao, Q., Zeng, L., Zhang, Z., Margariti, A., Ali, Z.A., Channon, K.M., Xu, Q. & Hu, Y. 2006, "Sca-1+ progenitors derived from embryonic stem cells differentiate into endothelial cells capable of vascular repair after arterial injury", Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2244-2251. Xu, Y., Yuan, L., Mak, J., Pardanaud, L., Caunt, M., Kasman, I., Larrivee, B., Del Toro, R., Suchting, S., Medvinsky, A., Silva, J., Yang, J., Thomas, J.L., Koch, A.W., Alitalo, K., Eichmann, A. & Bagri, A. 2010, "Neuropilin-2 mediates VEGF-C-induced lymphatic sprouting together with VEGFR3", The Journal of cell biology, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 115-130. Yamazaki, Y. & Morita, T. 2006, "Molecular and functional diversity of vascular endothelial growth factors", Molecular diversity, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 515-527. Yamazaki, Y., Takani, K., Atoda, H. & Morita, T. 2003, "Snake venom vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) exhibit potent activity through their specific recognition of KDR (VEGF receptor 2)", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 278, no. 52, pp. 51985-51988. 101 Yancopoulos, G.D., Davis, S., Gale, N.W., Rudge, J.S., Wiegand, S.J. & Holash, J. 2000, "Vascular-specific growth factors and blood vessel formation", Nature, vol. 407, no. 6801, pp. 242-248. Yang, W., Ahn, H., Hinrichs, M., Torry, R.J. & Torry, D.S. 2003, "Evidence of a novel isoform of placenta growth factor (PlGF-4) expressed in human trophoblast and endothelial cells", Journal of reproductive immunology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 53-60. Yang, Y., Jooss, K.U., Su, Q., Ertl, H.C. & Wilson, J.M. 1996, "Immune responses to viral antigens versus transgene product in the elimination of recombinant adenovirus-infected hepatocytes in vivo", Gene therapy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 137-144. Yang, Y., Nunes, F.A., Berencsi, K., Furth, E.E., Gonczol, E. & Wilson, J.M. 1994, "Cellular immunity to viral antigens limits E1-deleted adenoviruses for gene therapy", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 10, pp. 4407-4411. Yang, Y. & Oliver, G. 2014, "Development of the mammalian lymphatic vasculature", The Journal of clinical investigation, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 888-897. Yin, H., Kanasty, R.L., Eltoukhy, A.A., Vegas, A.J., Dorkin, J.R. & Anderson, D.G. 2014, "Non-viral vectors for genebased therapy", Nature reviews.Genetics, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 541-555. Yla-Herttuala, S. & Alitalo, K. 2003, "Gene transfer as a tool to induce therapeutic vascular growth", Nature medicine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 694-701. Yla-Herttuala, S. & Martin, J.F. 2000, "Cardiovascular gene therapy", Lancet, vol. 355, no. 9199, pp. 213-222. Yoon, D., Pastore, Y.D., Divoky, V., Liu, E., Mlodnicka, A.E., Rainey, K., Ponka, P., Semenza, G.L., Schumacher, A. & Prchal, J.T. 2006, "Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 deficiency results in dysregulated erythropoiesis signaling and iron homeostasis in mouse development", The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 281, no. 35, pp. 2570325711. Yoon, Y.S., Murayama, T., Gravereaux, E., Tkebuchava, T., Silver, M., Curry, C., Wecker, A., Kirchmair, R., Hu, C.S., Kearney, M., Ashare, A., Jackson, D.G., Kubo, H., Isner, J.M. & Losordo, D.W. 2003, "VEGF-C gene therapy augments postnatal lymphangiogenesis and ameliorates secondary lymphedema", The Journal of clinical investigation, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 717-725. Young, B., Lowe, J., Stevens, A. & Heath, J. 2006, Wheater's Functional Histology: A Text and Colour Atlas, 5th edition, Churchill Livingstone. Yuan, L., Moyon, D., Pardanaud, L., Breant, C., Karkkainen, M.J., Alitalo, K. & Eichmann, A. 2002, "Abnormal lymphatic vessel development in neuropilin 2 mutant mice", Development (Cambridge, England), vol. 129, no. 20, pp. 4797-4806. Zampell, J.C., Yan, A., Avraham, T., Daluvoy, S., Weitman, E.S. & Mehrara, B.J. 2012, "HIF-1alpha coordinates lymphangiogenesis during wound healing and in response to inflammation", FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1027-1039. Zampetaki, A., Kirton, J.P. & Xu, Q. 2008, "Vascular repair by endothelial progenitor cells", Cardiovascular research, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 413-421. Zhang, L., Zhou, F., Han, W., Shen, B., Luo, J., Shibuya, M. & He, Y. 2010, "VEGFR-3 ligand-binding and kinase activity are required for lymphangiogenesis but not for angiogenesis", Cell research, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 13191331. Zhang, X. & Simons, M. 2014, "Receptor tyrosine kinases endocytosis in endothelium: biology and signaling", Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1831-1837. 102 Zhang, Y., Chirmule, N., Gao, G.P., Qian, R., Croyle, M., Joshi, B., Tazelaar, J. & Wilson, J.M. 2001, "Acute cytokine response to systemic adenoviral vectors in mice is mediated by dendritic cells and macrophages", Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, vol. 3, no. 5 Pt 1, pp. 697-707. Zheng, S., Ulasov, I.V., Han, Y., Tyler, M.A., Zhu, Z.B. & Lesniak, M.S. 2007, "Fiber-knob modifications enhance adenoviral tropism and gene transfer in malignant glioma", The journal of gene medicine, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 151-160. Zheng, W., Aspelund, A. & Alitalo, K. 2014, "Lymphangiogenic factors, mechanisms, and applications", The Journal of clinical investigation, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 878-887. Zhou, H., Wang, M., Hou, C., Jin, X. & Wu, X. 2011, "Exogenous VEGF-C augments the efficacy of therapeutic lymphangiogenesis induced by allogenic bone marrow stromal cells in a rabbit model of limb secondary lymphedema", Japanese journal of clinical oncology, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 841-846. Ziche, M., Maglione, D., Ribatti, D., Morbidelli, L., Lago, C.T., Battisti, M., Paoletti, I., Barra, A., Tucci, M., Parise, G., Vincenti, V., Granger, H.J., Viglietto, G. & Persico, M.G. 1997, "Placenta growth factor-1 is chemotactic, mitogenic, and angiogenic", Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 517-531. Zirger, J.M., Puntel, M., Bergeron, J., Wibowo, M., Moridzadeh, R., Bondale, N., Barcia, C., Kroeger, K.M., Liu, C., Castro, M.G. & Lowenstein, P.R. 2012, "Immune-mediated loss of transgene expression from virally transduced brain cells is irreversible, mediated by IFNgamma, perforin, and TNFalpha, and due to the elimination of transduced cells", Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 808-819. Krista Honkonen Adenoviral Gene Therapy for the Stimulation of Neovessel Growth New Treatment Strategies for Lymphodema and Peripheral Ischemia In this thesis, gene therapeutic approaches for the treatment of lymphedema and peripheral ischemia, which result from insufficiency of lymphatic and blood vessels, respectively, are described. Adenoviral VEGF-C and VEGF-D were shown to induce robust lymphangiogenesis and, subsequently, improve lymphatic flow. Furthermore, the angiogenic response triggered by adenovirally delivered hypoxiainducible factors was shown to enhance the recovery of ischemic muscles from energy depletion induced by exercise. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland Dissertations in Health Sciences isbn 978-952-61-1778-2
© Copyright 2024