SWITCHING ON THE POWER OF E. COLI Lydia Alldred, Aimee Bias, Martin Campbell, Jake Casson, Robbie Evans, Amy Ferguson, Beth Grieg, Gemma McLelland , Jacob Roberts, Gintarė Sendžikaitė MOTILITY ABSTRACT We created a basic model of bacterial swimming (based on a Random Walk) for use in investigating the effects of gas vesicles. This led us to knock out swimming, as detailed below. We aimed to create a heritable system that, in the presence of a specific stimulus, would switch between expression of one set of genes (bacterial motility) and another (gas vesicles) based on the site-specific recombinase, φC31 integrase. We envisioned many possible applications, but decided to focus on water purification. We prepared bacterial knockouts for two flagellar genes and successfully rescued the mutants using our motility biobricks. This switch was shown to work through the use of GFP and RFP on opposite sides of the switch, using the sugar arabinose as the trigger in our proof-of-concept system. 100 step directed “Random Walk” Swarm assays to test motility of KO and WT strains. On 0.3% agar, E. coli can swim across the surface. If motile bacteria are spotted onto the centre, they migrate outwards; non-motile do not. Both fliC and motA KOs were totally defective in swimming, whereas the WT strains could swim to the edges. Gene rescue of fliC restored swimming to WT level, ΔmotA required motA/motB to swim. WT FLOTATION THE SWITCH Φc31 Integrase binds to attP and attB sites in DNA. It creates double strand breaks, inverts, and then ligates the DNA, creating attR and attL sites which can no longer be cut. Our idea was to make Integrase expression inducible, to allow cells to switch from expressing swimming genes, to genes for producing gas vesicles. As this is a change to the DNA, it is heritable and irreversible. During our two visits to Glasgow Science Centre, we were able to interact with the public and gauge their opinion on our project. They enjoyed our poster, and the kids loved our bubble-based-bonanza. We calculated a range of floating speeds for vesicle-filled bacteria. Adding a buoyancy component to our random walk had little effect on natural movement – swimming needed to be knocked out. BEST BIOBRICKS BBa_K1463000 Our switch BBa_K1463560 Our reverse RBS BBa_K1463602 Our fliC/promoter construct POLICY AND PRACTICE We focused on water purification for our switch. Freshwater accounts for 2.5% of the world’s water and with increasing water shortages it is more vital to make the other 97.5% available. We asked the public their opinion on uses for bacteria-purified water, and they strongly favoured use in agriculture as opposed to drinking. Gas vesicles are biconical protein compartments (right above) made from gvps (gas vesicle proteins) that fill with surrounding gas, allowing cyanobacteria to float. When we transformed gvps into E. coli, they arrested cell division (right below). This picture shows the above construct with GFP and reverse RFP (under the control of our reverse RBS) When the cells were exposed to arabinose, this induced Integrase, and the cells stopped expressing RFP, and instead expressed GFP. Left is exposure to glucose, right is exposure to arabinose. Overlay of red and green fluorescent images using 532 nm laser and LPG filter and 473 laser and BPB filter respectively Thanks to Dr Sean Colloms, Dr Julien Reboud, Professor Marshall Stark, Ms Zhao Jia, Ms Emma Smith, Ms Abioye Jumai FUTURE WORK • Test integrase under the control of different inducible promoters • Create functioning gas vesicles • Test function of motility and vesicle genes within inversion switch • Attempt aggregation using University of Aberdeen’s AG43 to increase flotation velocity. Dillon,R. Fauci,L. Gaver,D. A Microscale Model of Bacterial Swimming, Chemotaxis and Substrate Transport.Journal of Theoretical Biology.1995. Vol 177(4). p 325-340. Walsby, AE. Gas Vesicles. Microbiological Reviews. 1994. Volume 58. p 138.
© Copyright 2024