Using data analytics to prioritise high risk critical pipe failure National ICT Australia and Sydney Water have developed a conceptual model for Sydney Water that predicts high risk failures on critical water pipes. This model out performs the current water industry practices. Context NICTA (National ICT Australia) is Australia’s Information Communications Technology (ICT) Research Centre of Excellence and the nation’s largest organisation dedicated to ICT research. NICTA’s primary goal is to pursue high-impact research excellence and, by applying this research, create national benefit and wealth for Australia. NICTA’s machine learning group rates among the top five machine learning groups in the world. Sydney Water manages 21,000 km of water and 24,000 km of wastewater pipes. These include 5,000 km of critical water pipes and 900 km of large concrete wastewater pipes. Sydney Water’s investment on renewals of critical water pipes is about $32 million a year and for smaller water pipes another $30 million a year. The yearly investment on large concrete wastewater pipes is $40 million a year. Targeting better condition assessment will improve the efficiency of the investment in pipe renewals. Nature of collaboration The collaboration between Sydney Water and NICTA is based on a partnership arrangement, with NICTA providing data analytics research expertise and Sydney Water providing data and system knowledge. Governance arrangements are in place to ensure that the partnership will deliver value to Sydney Water and its customers. Current success in predicting failure in large critical water pipes Successful collaboration between both parties during the last three years has resulted in a conceptual model to prioritise high risk pipes with a higher level of confidence. This is world leading research that out performs significantly the current water industry practice. Machine learning –the key data analytics technique This is a metaphor – treating the machine as a child and teaching it to use observations (features or attributes) as inputs and corresponding labels as outputs. The combination of observations and labels is called training data. Figure 1- Blind folded men and an elephant: machine learning concept We take ’blind folded men and an elephant‘, (Figure 1). The shapes of the ears, teeth, legs, and other body parts are the observations and the label is ’elephant‘. Machine learning aims Using data analytics to priotorise high risk cricial pipe failure SW149 12/14- © Sydney Water. All rights reserved. Page | 1 to create a rule which is able to bundle all the observations together to the label, avoiding biased predictions. 1% With better targeting of high risks pipes for critical water main renewals Sydney Water should reduce cost by several million dollars over a four year price determination period and minimise inconvenience to customers from main breaks. Detected failures Benefits and value to customers Data analytics method and outcome Inspected length (km) Figure 3 - Sydney Water System total pipe analysis NICTA concept (green) vs water industry practice (red) We analysed a number of parameters (figure 2) and considered three levels of pipes to include, elements (pipes), shut down blocks and mains. We also used Sydney Water’s economic model and level of constraints considered for risk modelling for the analysis and validated the outcome using 2012 data. NICTA’s concept on critical pipes 100% more efficient to identify failures Further collaboration in smaller water pipes Currently international water industry practice is to run to failure for the smaller pipes. We are planning to collaborate further to extend this research effort to smaller pipes (<300 mm) identifying the high risk pipes and prioritising areas for active leak detection, as there is significant investment on replacing smaller pipes and considering the impact to the customers when breaks occur. NICTA Dr Fang Chen Research Group Manager, Machine Learning [email protected] Figure 2 – We analysed a number of parameters using the total critical water pipe failures from1999 – 2011 within Sydney Water. The data validation demonstrated that the NICTA conceptual model for the total Sydney Water system can identify 100% more failures for the same effort of inspection. Carly Perry Business manager Infrastructure, Transport & Logistics [email protected] Sydney Water Dammika Vitanage Asset & Infrastructure Research Coordinator [email protected] David Zhang Strategist Servicing & Asset Strategy Liveable City Solutions Sydney Water [email protected] Using data analytics to priotorise high risk cricial pipe failure Page | 2
© Copyright 2024