From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. 1996 87: 1155-1161 High incidence of potential p53 inactivation in poor outcome childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia at diagnosis DI Marks, BW Kurz, MP Link, E Ng, JJ Shuster, SJ Lauer, I Brodsky and DS Haines Updated information and services can be found at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/87/3/1155.full.html Articles on similar topics can be found in the following Blood collections Information about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#repub_requests Information about ordering reprints may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#reprints Information about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/subscriptions/index.xhtml Blood (print ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020), is published weekly by the American Society of Hematology, 2021 L St, NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20036. Copyright 2011 by The American Society of Hematology; all rights reserved. From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. High Incidence of Potential p53 Inactivation in Poor Outcome Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia at Diagnosis By David I. Marks, Benedikt W. Kurz, Michael P. Link, Eliza Ng, Jonathan J. Shuster, Stephen J. Lauer, lsadore Brodsky, and Dale S. Haines Previousstudies have indicated that p53 gene mutations were an uncommon event in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children. In one series of330 patients, p53mutations were seen in fewer than 3%. Weanalyzedbone marrow mononuclear cells derived from 10 children with ALL at diagnosis who subsequentlyfailed to achieve a complete remission or who developed relapsewithin 6 months of attaining completeremissionforp53gene mutations and mdm-2 overexpression. We found that three children had p53 gene mutations,andfouroverexpressed mdm-2. Also,experiments comparing relative levels of mdm-2 RNA and protein in these patients demonstrated that mdm-2 overexpression can occur at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional level in primary leukemic cells. Although we were unable to link Waf-l RNA expressionwith p53 statusin childhood ALL, our datashow potential p53 inactivation by multiple mechanisms in a large percentage of these patients and demonstrate that these alterations can be detected at diagnosis. Inactivationof the p53 pathway may, therefore, be important in childrenwith ALL who fail to respondto treatment and may be useful for the early identification of children requiring alternative therapies. 0 1996 by The American Society of Hematology. T Overexpression of mdm-2 constitutes a potential alternative mechanism of p53 pathway inactivation,” but its significance has not been determined in pediatric ALL. Mdm2 RNA overexpression is seen in about 20% to30%of ALL.”.” Mdm-2 RNA overexpression is seen in all pediatric ALL cell lines where there was a wild type p53 gene present,13 but the significance of mdm-2 overexpression in primary leukemic cells at diagnosis remains unclear. In this study, we examine p53 gene status and mdm-2 expression in the bone marrow mononuclear cells of 10 children with ALL who failed to achieve complete remission orwho relapsed shortly after achieving remission (“poor outcome” ALL). Our goal was to determine whether molecular alterations in the p53 pathway through p53 gene mutations or mdm-2 protein overexpression were a frequent event inpoor outcome pediatric ALL. We show that there is a high incidence of potential p53 pathway inactivation in this group of patients and that the alterations can be detected at diagnosis. Three patients demonstrated p53 gene mutations, while four other patients overexpressed mdm-2 protein. In addition, we describe two patients with mdm-2 protein over- HE DEVELOPMENT OF effective therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children constitutes one of the major advances in oncology during the past 25 years. Currently about 70% to 75% of children are cured. Modern multiple drug induction regimens achieve complete remissions in 96% to 100% of patients.’ Further improvements in these results may be made by identifying subsets of patients with resistant disease who require more intensive therapy including early bone marrow transplantation or more aggressive induction regimens.’ Clinical markers have been used to define high, low, and intermediate risk groups. However, these have limitations because some patients with no adverse clinical or chromosomal markers do not respond to therapy. Genetic factors are important in the etiology and outcome of pediatric ALL. Certain familial genetic disorders predispose to ALL; the incidence is increased in siblings and monozygotic twins. Chromosomal abnormalities are seen in 90% of cases, and many structural abnormalities appear to confer a worse prognosis.’ There are a number of molecular alterations that have been found to correlate with outcome in childhood ALL. For example, chromosomal translocations leading to the E2A-PBXl, bcr-ab1 or MLL-AF4 fusion genes have been associated with a poor In contrast, patients overexpressing the myc proto-oncogene via the 8; 14 translocation may have a favorable prognosis with shortterm intensive therapy.6 However, the incidence of each of these abnormalities is low. Overall, the translocations resulting in bcr-ab1 (3% to 5%), E2A-PBX1 (6%), MLL-AF4 (2%), and myc overexpression (1%) are rare. Abnormalities of the p53 gene are common in human cancers and may be of prognostic significance in hematologic malignan~ies.~ The use of p53 as a potential prognostic marker in childhood ALL appears limited as the incidence of p53 mutations at diagnosis is low.’ In a large retrospective study of 330 patients, only eight were found to have p53 gene mutations. Nevertheless, there is a suggestion that p53 mutations may be important in determining the response to therapy, because four of the eight patients with mutations died of aggressive disease. p53 mutations are uncommon in childhood T-cell ALL at diagnosis, but may be more frequently detected at relapse and can be a predictor of subsequent outcome.’ Blood, Vol 87, No 3 (February l), 1996 pp 1155-1161 From the Division of Hematology and Oncology, the Department of Medicine, Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, PA;the Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; POG Statistical OfJice, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and Emory University, Atlanta, CA. Submitted July 18, 1995; accepted September 14, 1995. Supported in part by the Institute for Cancer and Blood Diseases at Hahnemann University and by Grant No. CA-29139 (National Cancer Institute) to the Pediatric Oncology Group. E.N. was supported by an ASH Summer Medical Student Scholarship award. D.I.M. and B.W.K. contributed equally to this study. Address reprint requests to Dale S. Haines, PhD, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann Universiry, Broad and Vine, Philadelphia, PA 19102. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement’’in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 0 1996 by The American Society of Hematology. 0006-4971/96/8703-0018$3.00/0 1155 From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. 1156 MARKS ET AL expression who had normal mdm-2 RNA levels, indicating the importance of measuring protein and not just RNA and pointing to a novel posttranscriptional mechanism of mdm2 overexpression in primary leukemic cells. MATERIALS ANDMETHODS Patients and samples. Patients included in this study were treated on the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) ALin C #l5 Studies for Standard and High Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, conducted between January 1991 and November 1994. Informed consent for sample submission was obtained from patients or from their parents. Bone marrow specimens were routinely obtained from all patients at diagnosis entered onto these studies and were sent by overnight courier to the St Jude Children’s Research Hospital. Mononuclear cells from these bone marrow specimens were separated by Ficoll-Hypaque (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) density gradient sedimentation, washed in phosphate-buffered saline, resuspended in 70% RPMI/20% fetal calf semm/lO% dimethyl sulfoxide, and cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. We identified children on these studies who failed to achieve complete remission or who achieved complete remission, but developed relapse within 6 months of diagnosis and had cryopreserved cells available for study. Cryopreserved cells from these patients were sent by overnight courier in dry ice and were immediately thawed and processed. Lymphocytes from normal donors (obtained with informed consent) were also prepared by FicollHypaque density gradient sedimentation and were stored as described above. Cytogenetic andfluorescent in situ hybridization analysis. Standard cytogenetic techniques were employed and at least 20 metaphases were examined on each patient where possible. Single color metaphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed using a mixture of digoxigenin labelled p53 cosmid and labelled 17alpha satellite probes (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD). Hybridization, posthybridization washes, and detection with fluorescein isothiocyanate labelled antidigoxigenin antibody were performed according to the manufacturer’s recommended conditions. DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction single strand conformational polymorphism analysis and DNA sequencing. High molecular weight DNA was purified from ethanol after a proteinase K digestion and a phenol-chloroform extraction.I4 Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed with p53 amplimer primers (exons 4-9, Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) using the manufacturer’s recommended conditions. Labelled PCR products were then denatured, chilled on ice, and immediately loaded onto two gel systems to maximize the potential for observing mobility shifts.15These were a 6% polyacrylamide/0.5~TBE gel containing 5% glycerol’‘ and a mutation detection enhancement gel with 0.6X TBE (HydrolinkMDE, AT Biochem, Malvern, PA). Products were electrophoresed at 25 W for 5 hours (or at 10 W for 14 hours for MDE gels) at room temperature, dried under vacuum, and subjected to autoradiography. Aberrant migrating bands were excised from dried gels, resuspended in water, boiled for 15 minutes, and reamplified with appropriate primer combinations. PCR products were then subcloned into PCRIII (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). DNA from clones containing inserts was pooled and sequenced with a Sequenase I1 kit from US Biochemicals (Cleveland, OH) using the p53 amplimer primers. Northern analysis. RNA was isolated using RNAzol-B (Biotecx, Houston, TX), and approximately 10 pg of total cellular RNA was blotted onto Hybond N’ membrane (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) after separation on 1% formaldehyde-agarose gels.17 Blots were then hybridized with a random hexamer 32P-labelledmdm-2 probe” or Waf-l probe (a kind gift from W. El-Dheiry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) in Rapidhyb buffer (Amersham) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Blots were subsequently washed once at roomtemperature with 2X SSC/O.l% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and thentwice with 0.2X SSC/0. I % SDS at 65°C. Densitometrywas performed with RFLP-scan software (Scanalytics, Laurel, MD), and relative overexpression of mdm-2 and Waf-l were determined after standardization with 18s RNA. Western analysis. Western blot analysis with 100 pg of total cellular protein was performed with monoclonal antibodies to mdm2 (IF2, Oncogene Sciences, San Diego, CA), p53 (DO-l, Oncogene Sciences) and actin (Amersham) as described previously.” Verification of loading was also evaluated after transfer using Ponceau S (Sigma, St Louis, MO). RESULTS Patient characteristics, therapy, and survival. The major clinical and prognostic findings in the 10 patients treated on one of two POG protocols (900518 and 9006”) are summarized in Table 1. All individuals responded poorly to therapy and had short event-free survivals (median 39 days). Nine of 10 patients had at least one adverse prognostic feature. The majority were male, and five of 10 were younger than 2 or older than 10 years. Eight of 10 had a white cell count exceeding 50 X lo9& and four had extramedullary disease. Cytogenetic abnormalities were seen in 70%, but only one patient had involvement of chromosome 17. Two patients had a t(4;ll) and one had an atypical t(9;22); none had a t( 1;19) rearrangement. P53 gene status. Single strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) has been used extensively to detect mutations within the p53 gene and has been shown to be >90% effective when analyzing PCR products between 100 and 300 bp long (reviewed in reference 20). We, therefore, employed this type of analysis to identify if any ofthe 10 poor outcome patients possessed mutations within the “hot spot” regions (exons 4 to 9) of p53 at diagnosis. Three patients (1, 6, and 10) had mobility shifts involving exons 8, 6, and 5 respectively (Fig 1). Patients 6 and 10 appeared to possess wild type alleles in the analyzed cell population, while patient 1 had only mutant p53 alleles. DNA sequencing showed that patient 1 had a pro,arg insertion at AA282. This is within a “hot spot” region of p53 and is inan evolutionarily conserved domain, which is one of the most frequent sites of missense mutations. The second (patient 6) hadan asp to gly substitution at AA207, which is not in an evolutionarily conserved site, but is close to a region of p53 that is recognized by a mutant conformation specific p53 monoclonal antibody.’” It is noteworthy that this patient, who did not respond to induction chemotherapy and developed progressive disease at 22 days, had no adverse clinical prognostic factors. The only patient (number 10) to have loss of heterozygosity for the p53 gene by karyotype analysis (Table 1) had a single nucleotide deletion (-C) at codon 179 resulting in a frameshift mutation. Karyotype analysis, but not SSCP, suggested loss of the other functional allele in malignant cells from patient 10. FISH analysis was performed to determine the p53 gene status in the malignant cell population from this patient (Fig 2) and demonstrated that this patient had two populations of cells. Approximately 50% of metaphases examined contained two chromosome 17s and two Y.+5 From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. ALL p53 IN CHILDHOOD Table 1. Initial Characteristics, Prognostic Features and Outcome of Childhood ALL Patients Patient No. Age lyr) 1 8 WCC (x109/L) 783 R Karyotype. 46,XY,+X,der(4)t(4;11)(11;22)~q21;q23q25;qll), CR mdm-2 Waf-l p53 Gene Status Overexpression Levelst - 4.0 253 LOH and Pro, Arg insertion at codon 282 Wt mdm-2 protein 5.0 EMD EFS (dl S 84 L, S der(ll)t(4;11)(11;22)(q21;q23q25;qll),inv(l6) (q21q23),-22 2172 46,XY,add(9)(p21)[51/47,XY,+lO[4l/46,XY[lll PR 17 CNS 254 15 3 2 205 4 1 18 6 5 6 5 NR 7 7 3 103 8 9 10 15 61 46,XY 10 95 259 52,XY,+X,+Y,+de1(13)(q12q21)x2,+21,+21 CR - 169 Wt mdm-2 protein and RNA 4.0 46,XX,de1(7)(q31) NR - 36 27 Wt Wt mdm-2 protein mdm-2 protein and RNA 26.3 22.0 - 22 - 35.7 CR L 173 Asp Gly at codon 207 Wt - 2.0 NR NR NR - - 33.0 117.0 60.0 46,XX 45,XY,t(3;13;9)(p21;q34;p22),t(4;1l)(q21;q23), der(6)t(6;12)(q25;q13),dic(12;12)(q13;p11) 46,XY 44,XY,de1(12)(pll),der(l7)t(17;22)(pll;ql1), add(l9)~p13),-21,-22[111/44,XY, N - 22 Wt 41 Wt 25LOH and frame-shift at codon 179 - - der~9)t(9;22)(p21;qll),del(l2)(pl1),-17, +add(l9)(p13),-21,-22[41/46,XY~51 Abbreviations: WCC, white cell count; R, response; CR. complete response; PR, partial response; NR, no response;EMD, extramedullary disease; S, spleen; L, liver; CNS, central nervous system; N. Nodes; EFS, event free survival; Wt. wild-type; LOH, loss of heterozygosity. Patients 2 and 10 possessed multiple malignant clones in the analyzed population. t The relative levels of Waf-l RNA for each patient were determined by densitometric analysis after normalization for loading differences with 18s RNA. p53 alleles, while the remaining metaphases had only one p53 gene copy. Therefore, it is likely that patients 1 and IO have loss of p53 function via loss of heterozygosity and p53 gene mutations in a significant percentage of malignant cells. However, because patient 6 has retained one wild type p53 allele and does nothave a mutation in an evolutionarily conserved domain of p53, it remains uncertain if p53 is inactivated in this individual. Mdm-2 status. Similar to p53 gene mutations, overexpression of the mdm-2 oncogene has the potential to inhibit the tumor suppressing function of p53 (reviewed in reference N Z 1 SSCP EXON 8 N 5 6 SSCP EXON 6 N 10 21 MDE EXON 5 Fig 1. SSCP analysis of patients 1. 6, and 10. Patient 1 has a homozygous mobility shift (no normal bandseen), while patients 6 and l 0 appear heterozygous for the p53 gene because normal lunshifted) bands are also present. IO). Mdm-2 RNA overexpression appears to be common in hematological malignancies and has been found in 20% to 50% of cases of AML and ALL."." Figure 3 shows a Northem blot of the IO pediatric ALL patients using RNA from samples obtained at diagnosis. Of I O patients analyzed by northern blots, two overexpressed mdm-2 RNA more than IO-fold compared withbonemarrow cells from a normal donor. Recentwork in choriocarcinoma celllines"and in primary leukemic cells from Sezary syndrome patients'' showedthatmdm-2 proteins can be overexpressed in the absence of increased levels of mdm-2 transcripts. This underscores the need to analyze relative levels of mdm-2 proteins to fully evaluate mdm-2 overexpression in human cancers. Similar to control bone marrow cells, mdm-2 protein was barely detectable or not detectable in six of I O patients. However, four poor outcome patients had cells with elevated levels of mdm-2 protein (Fig 4). Interestingly, two of these four patients had normal levels of mdm-2 RNA. Also, multiple mechanisms of overexpression may play a role in patients with elevated levels of mdm-2 RNA as the extent of mdm2 protein overexpression was much greater than the extent of mdm-2 RNA overexpression. Allof the patientswith mdm-2 protein overexpression had wild type p53 genes, but only four of the seven patients with wild type p53 had mdm2 overexpression. Meas~rrement of Wqf-1 RNA levels. It isnotcertain which p53 gene mutations or what degree of mdm-2 overexpression is necessary to cause p53 pathway inactivation in vivo. Waf-I is a gene thatis transcriptionally upregulated From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. MARKS ET AL 1158 B A Fig2.FISHanalysis of metaphases from patient 10. Single color metaphase FISH was performed using a combination of digoxigenin labelled p53 cosmid and labelled 17-alphasatellite probes. Chromosomes were identified by PI staining (not shown). (AI shows centromeric and p53 signals on the t w o normal chromosome 17s. (B), which is of a karyotype of monosomy 17, shows only one set of centromeric and p53 signals. Patient 10 possessed >95% blastsin the marrow at diagnosis. Because approximately 50% ofthe analyzed metaphases had one set of signals, it is likely that a large percentage of malignant cells from this individual has one copy ofthe p53 gene. by wild type and not mutant p53 (reviewed in reference 22). For these reasons we chose to analyze Waf-l RNA as a potential downstream marker of p53 pathway activity in primary leukemic cells. Normal bone marrow had relatively low levels of Waf-l RNA (Fig 5). There was a wide range in Waf-l RNA levels in the 10 samples. Patient 1, who has a p53 mutation, had low Waf-l RNA levels, but patients 6 and 10, who also have p53 mutations, had relatively high levels. Overall, in a small group of patients, there was no significant difference in Waf-l RNA levels between the patients with p53 or mdm-2 abnormalities and those without. DISCUSSION The p53 pathway is potentially affected by p53 gene mutation or mdm-2 overexpression in a wide variety of human cancers. The presence of p53 mutations appears to confer a worse prognosis in some20*23-25 but not all types of solid tumorsF6 Similar to solid tumors, the significance of p53 mutations in hematologic malignancies depends on the precise diagnosis. For example, in a large retrospective study of acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, p53 mutations were found to correlate with low complete remission rates and poor survival? However, the presence of p53 mutations did not confer a worse prognosis in Burkitt's lymphoma." Although mdm-2 overexpression has been associated with poor prognostic features in small series of patients with diverse hematologic malignancies,".'2 the overall significance of mdm-2 overexpression in leukemia is uncertain. With the exception of L3 abnormalities of the p53 pathway appear to be uncommon in pediatric ALL: occurring in less than 3% of all patients. This finding seems to suggest that abnormalities of the p53 pathway are unlikely to be a significant prognostic factor in this disease. Alternatively, p53 may be important prognostically, but inactivation may occur through mechanisms other than p53 gene mutation. This study of 10 poor outcome children with ALL demonstrates that p53 inactivation may be a consistent and common molecular abnormality at diagnosis in pediatric ALL patients who fail to enter complete remission or relapse soon after achieving remission. Abnormalities of the p53 pathway through p53 gene mutations (three patients) or mdm-2 overexpression (four patients) were seen in seven of 10 individuals. It is likely that these alterations may be restricted to poor outcome patients. This is based on studies by others demonstrating that p53 gene mutations are rare in unselected cases of pediatric ALL: but are much more common in samples taken from patients at the time of relapse? Also, in an initial screen of 25 good outcome patients, we were unable to identify any patients who overexpressed mdm-2 (Marks, Kurz and Haines, unpublished data). Confirmation that p53 pathway alterations are important in the response of this disease to chemotherapy will require a study that compares poor outcome ALL to a group of good outcome patients who respond well to therapy and remain in long-term continuous remission. It is becoming apparent that p53 mutations may have variable effects on cellular proliferation." Some p53 mutants From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. 1159 p53 INACTIVATION IN CHILDHOODALL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 N Fig 5. Waf-l Northern analysis, using RNA isolated from bone marrow lymphocytes of10 children with poor outcomeALL at diagFig 3. Mdm-2 Northern analysis, using RNA isolated from bone nosis and from the marrow of one normal donor(NI, was performed marrow lymphocytes of 10 children with poor outcomeALL at diagas described in Materials and Methods. The relative levels of Waf-l nosis and from the marrow one of normal donor(NI, was performed RNA, Waf-l (NI, for each patient were determined by densitometric as described in Materials and Methods. The relative levels of mdm2 RNA, mdm-Z(N), for each patient were determined by densitometricanalysis after normalization for loadingdifferences with 18s RNA. analysis after normalization for loadingdifferences with 18s RNA. tients to determine if this type of analysis will prove to be a valid way of assessing p53 function in primary tumor cells. In keeping with previous studies of cell lines derived from pediatric ALL patients,” all individuals with mdm-2 overexpressionhadwild type p53 alleles. Also, the same study showed that all lines that had wild type alleles overexpressed mdm-2. We were unable to demonstrate either mdm-2 RNA or protein overexpression in three patients with wild type p53 alleles. It is, therefore, unlikelythatmdm-2 overexpression in leukemic cells with wild type p53 is simply due to the increased proliferative potential of these cells in vivo. This study also shows thatmdm-2 overexpression can occur in the absence of increased mdm-2 RNA in primary leukemic cells. Two patients had elevated levels ofboth mdm-2 RNA andmdm-2 protein, whiletwo patients had only elevated levels of mdm-2 protein. This finding emphasizes the importance of measuring mdm-2 protein and not only mdm-2 RNA when evaluating the incidence of mdm2 overexpression in hematological malignancies. It also demonstrates that mdm-2 overexpression can occur at both transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. It is supported by our data showing that the relative levels of mdm-2 protein may have dominant negative activity,.“’..”while for other mutations, complete p53 pathway inactivation may require alteration of both alleles.” Two of the patients demonstrated both loss of heterozygosity for p53 and a p53 gene mutation, while one patientwith a p53 mutation appeared to have retained one wild-type allele. It is possible that the p53 pathway is functional in this last individual. Another major uncertainty when assessing p53 pathway function is what degree of mdm-2 overexpression is necessary to inhibit p53 activity. These observations highlight the importance of assessing p53 pathway function in vivo. It may be possible to use downstream transcriptional targets of p53 as a method of assessing p53 function. Unfortunately, our data show no statistically significant difference between the levels of Waf1 RNA (a gene that is upregulated by wild type and not mutant p53) in individuals with p53 pathway abnormalities compared with those with wild type p53 alleles and normal mdm-2 levels. This was not a surprising finding as other investigators have shown that Waf-l maybe regulated by p53 independent mechanisms in leukemic celk3”Other p53 transcriptional need beto analyzed in these pa- 1 2 NI) 18.5 102 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 ND ND N H J I ’ 1.0 14.0 NI) 0.5 ND 1.0 11.0 1 Fig 4. Western analysis for mdm-2 protein. A total of 100 p g of total cellular protein from the bone marrow of 10 children with poor outcome ALL was separated on 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), blotted ontonitrocellulose, and probed with a mdm-2 (top panel) or actin (bottompanel) monoclonal antibody. The three right lanes contain protein from normal bone marrow (NI, H1299 cells (HI, and JEG cells (J), respectively. JEG cells overexpress mdm-2 protein compared with the H1299 line in the absence of increased m d m t RNA levels.” High levels of mdm-2 protein were observed only in patients 2, 3, 4, and 5, while no mdm-2 protein was detected in the normal control or patients 1, 6, 7, 8, or 9. Low levels of mdm-2 protein wereobserved for patient 10. The number presented represents the relative intensity of the mdm-2 band. The apparent band for patient 7 represents a blotting error; no mdm-2 protein was detectable on repeated experiments. From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. 1160 MARKS ET AL overexpression is greater than the relative levels of mdm-2 RNA overexpressioninpatients with increasedmdm-2 RNA. Recent work has proposedthat the posttranscriptional mechanism of enhanced translation can cause mdm-2 overexpression in a human choriocarcinoma cell line.” Studies measuring translation efficiency of mdm-2 RNA and mdm2 protein stabilityare currently being performed to determine the mechanism of mdm-2 overexpression in leukemic cells. We have recently documentedmdm-2 protein overexpression in the absence of mdm-2 RNA overexpression in Sezary syndrome.” These mechanistic studies will be important for elucidating the regulation of mdm-2 expression innormal lymphocytes and fordeterminingthecause of altered expression in leukemia. ACKNOWLEDGMENT We would like to thank Dr Mark Boyd for his criticisms of the manuscript. We are grateful to Dons Morgan for preparing metaphases from the marrow cells and to Abby Sukman for performing the FISH analyses. We would also like to thank Wafik El-Deiry for providing the Waf-l probe. REFERENCES 1. Rivera GA, Crist WM: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, in Handin RI, LuxSE and Stossel TP (eds): Blood-Principles and Practice of Hematology. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott, 1995, p 743 2. h i C-H: Childhood leukemias. N Engl J Med 332: 1618, 1995 3. Crist WM, Carroll AJ, Shuster JJ, Behm FG, Whitehead M, Vietti TJ, Look AT, Mahoney D, Ragab A, Pyllen DJ, Land VJ: Poor prognosis of children with pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with the ((1; 19)(q23;p13). Blood 76:117, 1990 4. Fletcher JA, Tu N, Tantravahi R, Sallan SE: Extremely poor prognosis of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia with translocation (9;22): Updated experience. Leuk Lymphoma 8:75, 1992 S . Crist W, Carroll A, Shuster J, Jackson J, Head D, Borowitz M, Behm F, Link M, Steuber P, Ragab A, Hirt A, Brock B, Land V. Pullen J: Philadelphia chromosome positive childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Clinical and cytogenetic characteristics and treatment outcome-A Pediatric Oncology Group study. Blood 76:489, 1990 6. Reiter A, Schrappe M, LudwigW-D, Lampert F, Harbott J, Henze C, Niemeyer CM, Gadner H, Miillerweihrich S, Riher J, Odenwald E, RiehmH: Favorable outcome of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood: A report of three consecutive studies of the BFM group. Blood 80:2471, 1992 7. Wattel E, Preudhomme C, Hecquet B, Vanrumbeke M, Quesne1 B, Dervite I, Morel P, Fenaux P: P53 mutations are associated with resistance to chemotherapy and short survival in hematologic malignancies. Blood 84:3148, 1994 8. Wada M, Bartram CR, Nakamura H, Hackiya M, Chen D-L, Borenstein J, Miller CW, Ludwig L, Hansen-Hagge TE, Ludwig WD, ReiterA, Mizoguchi H, KoefflerH P Analysis of p53 mutations in a large series of lymphoid malignancies of childhood. Blood 823163, 1993 9. Dicciani MB, Yu J, Hsiao M, Mukherjee S, Shao L-E, Yu AL: Clinical significance of p53 mutations in relapsed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 84:3105, 1994 10. Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW:p53 function and dysfunction. Cell 70523, 1992 I I . Quesnel B, Preudhomme C, Oscier D, Lepelley P, O’Hooghe MC, Facon T, Zandecki M, Fenaux P: Over-expression of the mdm- 2 gene is found in some cases of haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol 88:415, 1994 12. Bueso-Ramos CE, Yang Y, deLeon E,McCown P, Stass SA, Albitar M: The human MDM-2 oncogene is overexpressed in leukemias. Blood 82:2617, 1993 13. Zhou M, Yeager AM, Smith SD, Findley HW: Overexpression of the mdm2 gene by childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells expressing the wild-type p53 gene. Blood 85: 1608, 1995 14. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning. A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1989 15. Vidal-Puig A, Moller DE: Comparative sensitivity of altemative single strand conformation polymorphism methods. Biotechniques 17:490, 1994 16. Spinardi L, Mazars R, Theillet C: Protocols for an improved detection of point mutations by SSCP. Nucleic Acids Res 19:4009, 1991 17.Landers JE, Haines DS, Strauss JF, George DL:Enhanced translation: A novel mechanism of mdm2 oncogene overexpression identified in human tumor cells. Oncogene 9:2745, 1994 18. Mahoney DH, Camitta BM, Leventhal BC, Shuster J, Civin CJ, Ganick DJ, Lauer SJ, Steuber CP, Kamen BA: Repetitive low dose oral methotrexate and intravenous mercaptopurine treatment for patients with lower risk B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer 75:2623, 1995 19. Lauer SJ, Toledano S, Winich N, Munez L, Mahoney D, Pullen J, Steuber CP, Shuster J , CamittaB:A comparison of early intensive methotrexatehercaptopurine (MTXIMP) vs early intensive alternating chemotherapy for high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR-ALL): A Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) randomized phase Illstudy. Proc ASCO 14:342, 1995 (abstract 1030) 20. Thor AD, Moore DH, Edgerton SM, Kawasaki ES, Reihsaus E, Lynch HT, Marcus JN, Schwartz L, Chen L-C, Mayall BH, Smith HS: Accumulation of p53 tumor suppressor gene protein: An independent marker of prognosis in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer lnst 84345, 1992 21. Marks DI, Vonderheid EC, Kurz BW, Bigler RD, Sinha K, Nowell PC, Haines DS: Analysis of p53 and mdm-2 expression in 18 patients with Sezary syndrome. Br J Haematol (in press) 22. Pines J: p21 inhibits cyclin shock. Nature 369:520, 1994 23. MartinHM,FilipeMI, Morris RW,LaneDP. Silvestre F: p53 expression and prognosis in gastric carcinoma. Int J Cancer 50:859. 1992 24. Horio Y, Takahashi T, Kuroishi, Hibi K, Suyama M, Niimi T, Shimohata K, Yamakawa K, Nakamura Y, Ueda R, Takahashi T: Prognostic significance of p53 mutations and 3p deletions in primary resected non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer Res 53:l. I993 25. Lowe SW, Bodis S, McClatchey A, Remington L, Ruley HR, Fisher DE, Housman DE, Jacks T: p53 status andtheefficacy of cancer therapy in vivo. Science 266:807, 1994 26. Nylander K, Stenling R, Gustafson H, Zackrisson B, Roos G: p53 expression and cell proliferation in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer 75537, 1995 27. Preudhomme C, Dervite I, Wattel E, Vanrumbeke M, Flactif M, Lai JL,Hecquet B, Coppin MC, Nelkin B, Gosselin B, Fenaux P: Clinical significance of p53 mutations in newly diagnosed Burkitt’s lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report of 48 cases. J Clin Oncol 13212, 1995 28. Fenaux P, Jonveaux P, Quiquandon I, Preudhomme C, Lai JL, Vanrumbeke M, Loucheux-Lefebvre MH, Bauters F, Berger R, From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on October 21, 2014. For personal use only. p53 INACTIVATION IN CHILDHOOD ALL Kerckaert JP: Mutations of the p53 gene in B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: a report on 60 cases. Leukemia 6:42, 1992 29. Crook T, Marston NJ, Sara EA, Voudsen KH: Transcriptional activation by p53 correlates with suppression of growth but not transformation. Cell 79:817, 1994 30. Hachiya M, Chumakov A, Miller CW, Akashi M, Said J, Koeffler HP: Mutant p53 proteins behave in a dominant negative fashion in vivo. Anticancer Res 14:1853, 1994 3 1. Kern SE, Pietenpol JA, Thiagalingam S, Seymour A, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: Oncogenic forms of p53 inhibit p53-regulated gene expression. Science 256:827, 1992 32. Steinman RA, Hoffman B, Iro A, Guillouf C, Liebermann 1161 DA, el Houseini ME: Induction of p21 (WAF-UCIP-l) during differentiation. Oncogene 9:3389, 1994 33. Kastan MB, Zhan Q. el-Deiry WS, Carrier F, Jacks T, Walsh W, Plunkett BS, Vogelstein B, Fomace M : A mammalian cell cycle checkpoint pathway utilizing p53 and GADD45 is defective in ataxia telangiectasia. Cell 71587, 1992 34. Miyashita T, Reed JC: Tumor suppressor p53 is a direct transcriptionalactivator of thehumanbaxgene.Cell80:293, 1995 35. Dameron KM, Volpert OV, Tainsky MA, Bouck N: Control of angiogenesis in fibroblasts by p53 regulation of thrombospondin1. Science 265:1582, 1994
© Copyright 2024