פרשת תרומה ) (פרק כה' טו. לא יסרו ממנו,בטבעות הארן יהיו הבדים The poles shall remain in the rings of the Aron; they may not be removed from it. Rashi is bothered with the following: since the pasuk already said that the poles shall be in the rings to carry the Aron, why was it necessary to add לא יסרו ממנו/they may not be removed from it? He answers, based on .יומא עב, that it is to teach us that once the poles were placed in the rings, they must remain there permanently and if one removed them he was in violation of both the positive and negative commandments that are mentioned in this pasuk. חז"לin סוטה . להtell us that although its bearers held the poles on their shoulders and seemed to be carrying the Aron, in reality the Aron bore them; when it moved they were lifted with it, for in truth it is the Torah which carries and sustains the Jewish people. Why was it that לא יסרו ממנוwas applied only to the poles of the Aron but not to the other כלים which had בדים, i.e. the שלחן, מזבח הזהבor ?מזבח הנחושת Rav Sorotzkin, in his sefer אזנים לתורה, explains that the poles of the Aron were unique in that they were used not only for transporting but also had deeper, mystical purposes: Firstly, they demarcated a boundary within a boundary; for it was within the קדש הקדשים, between the space of the poles (and on top of the (כפורתthat the שכינהrested. Also, they protruded into the פרוכתas שתי דדי אשה. They therefore symbolized the constant and nurturing relationship Hashem has with us. By not allowing the poles to be removed from the Aron, the Torah is telling us that no matter what should transpire, the שכינהwill always abide in כלל ישראלand we will always be Hashem’s “favorite child”! He reinforces this by pointing out that when שלמה המלךis building the Bais HaMikdash, where there would no longer be a need to transport any of the כלי שרת, the pasuk in מלכים א' חstill describes the poles of the Aron but there is no mention of the בדיםof the other כלים-the Aron’s poles’ symbolic significance remained in place. Rav Hirsch presents us his own approach: “The בדיםof the Aron symbolize the destiny and the mission of carrying the Aron and its contents beyond the precincts of its present standing place, if this becomes necessary. The command that the poles must never be removed…establishes from the outset and for all time to come the truth that this Torah and its mission are not confined to the soil on which the Sanctuary or Temple once stood. The constant presence of the בדיםtestifies that Hashem’s Torah is not bound to or dependent on any particular placetestimony that is boldly underscored by the by the contrast between the Aron and the other furnishings of the Mishkan, especially the שלחןand the מנורה, which do not have permanently attached poles.” He concludes this piece with a dramatic statement: “Israel’s Table and Israel’s Menorah-the fullness of its material life and the flowering of its spiritual life-are bound to the soil of the Holy Land; Israel’s Torah is not.” The Meshech Chochma also provides us with his understanding of לא יסרו ממנו. He begins with a question posed in Medrash Rabba: We know that the Mishkan was constructed before the Aron-and rightfully so, for one must build a house before making the furnishings that will go into the house. Why then does the Torah state the command to build the Aron before the command to build the Mishkan itself? It answers that (we know that) the Aron represents the Crown of Torah and the Mishkan was a microcosm of the world. Just as the Torah was created (2000 years) before the world, “so too in the making of the Mishkan, Hashem put the command to make the Aron before the command of making all the other vessels.” The Medrash continues and says that by all other כליםthe command is ועשית/You shall make-singular. Yet with regards to the Aron the pasuk tells us, ועשו ארון/They shall make the Aron-plural? It answers that HKBH was telling Moshe, “Let everyone come and be involved in the making of the Aron, so that they will all merit having an attachment with the Torah.” The Meshech Chochma refers us to the אלשיךwho explains the last portion of the Medrash: The other divisions of our nation, the כתרי כהונה ומלכות, are reserved for those with the “right genetic makeup”. The Torah, though, is open for all to take and make his own-ועשו ארון, plural. The Meshech Chochma adds that we know that the Torah’s army, our תלמידי חכמים, also symbolized by the Aron, can only subsist with the help of the מחזיקי תורה, the lay-people who support them, who become “the poles of the Torah.” לא יסרו ממנוis teaching us that the support must be unwavering and unconditional! He adds another reason for לא יסרו ממנו. Rambam tells us that in the Bais HaMikdash, the candles of Menorah remained lit not only through the night but also during the day . He believes Rambam’s source for this is the : גמרא שבת כבwhich tells us that with regards to the daily obligation to kindle the Menorah, the Torah writes יערוך...מחוץ לפרכת העדות/Outside the curtain of testimony…(Aharon) shall arrange (the Menorah.) The Gemara asks: “Does Hashem (really) need the Menorah’s light? ...Rather (the light) is a testimony for all mankind that the שכינהdwells with Israel.” According to Rambam, the true “testimony” is during daytime when no one requires the light of the Menorah and just as during the day He does not need the light, so also during the night. And similarly with regards to the Aron: The גמרא סוטהmentioned earlier told us that there really was no need for the poles of the Aron, for the Aron contained the Torah, which sustained the entire world and therefore was able to “carry itself.” By specifically telling us, even when the Aron was resting and not traveling, לא יסרו ממנו, the Torah is alluding to the aforementioned phenomenon-just as the poles were not needed when the Aron was at rest, so too were they not needed when it was traveling, !שהוא נושא את נושאיו לזכר נשמת אבי מורי ישראל מנחם בן שלום ז"ל ולזכר נשמת הרב יהודה בן אברהם שמחה (קופרמן) זצ"ל
© Copyright 2024