INDIA Technical Engineering Educational Quality Improvement II (TEQIP-II) Fourth Joint Review Mission December 8-19, 2014 Aide Memoire Page 1 I. INTRODUCTION 1. The World Bank and Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) team carried out the fourth Joint Review Mission (JRM) from December 8-19, 2014. The JRM team (see Annex 1 for list of members) would like to extend its gratitude to Mr. Amarjeet Sinha, Additional Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) for his leadership of the TEQIP project and hisguidance during the JRM. The JRMteam would also like to thank Ms. Tripti Gurha, Director (MHRD) and officials at National Project Implementation Unit (NPIU) for overall coordination of the JRM, especially in the preparation of various background materials, organization of workshops (with Mentors and Performance Auditors, CFIs, SPFUs, IIMs and IITs), informativepresentations and proactive participation in discussions. 2. The objectives of the JRM were to review the overall progress of the project with Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), National Project Implementation Unit (NPIU), State Project Implementation Units (SPFUs), and other implementing partners. The mission reviewed actions taken by the project as proposed in the Implementation Support Mission held in April 2014. The mission visited three institutions each in the states of Andhra Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan and Telangana. Half-day meetings were held with IITs and IIMs to evaluate the impact of their work on pedagogical and management training, respectively, under the project as well as review the plans for the project extension period. Meetings were held with a group of Mentors and Performance Auditors to review the progress of their work; on the development of a common evaluation template for review of Centres of Excellence; with low-performing CFIs to review progress of project related activities; and with Infova Consultancy Services Limited to report the progress/ findings from the Faculty/ Staff and Student Satisfaction survey. The full schedule is inAnnex 2 --. 3. This is the first Joint Review Mission since the project was formally extended to October 31st, 2016 and revised end-of-project indicator targets were set. 4. On the basis of information provided during the JRM, the World Bank rated the project as follows: Project Data Board Approval Effectiveness Closing date Original Credit Revised Credit Amount disbursed (Dec 12, 2014) % Disbursed (Dec 12, 2014) Age of the Project 03/18/2010 08/6/2010 10/31/2016 SDR 186.4 m SDR 134.6 m SDR 52.4 m US$ 289.5 m US$ 197 m US$ 76.6 m 38.9 Current Ratings* Development Implementation Project Management Procurement Financial Counterpart Funding Monitoring Evaluation Last S MS MS MS MS MS and S Now S MS MS MS MS MS S 4.7 years * Ratings: HS=Highly Satisfactory; S=Satisfactory; MS= Moderately Satisfactory; MU= Moderately Unsatisfactory; U=Unsatisfactory; HU=Highly Unsatisfactory; NA=Not Applicable; NR=Not Rated. II. OVERALL FINDINGS 5. There is no change in the ratings for this project. 6. The progress against the Project Development Objective (PDO) is rated as Satisfactory. Almost all indicators are on track (some indicator targetshave been revised for the Page 2 extension period). In particular, the strengthening of the reform elements of the project continues to be noticeable and striking. The project is providing many examples of good practice which other engineering institutions (and indeed other higher education institutions) institutions would do well to emulate. A number of reforms which have been discussed for many years (such as a significant increase in the number of autonomous institutions) have a concrete reality in the TEQIP project. 7. Implementation Progress is rated as Moderately Satisfactory. Activities at institutional level are proceeding well, with some very good performers though there is a minority of institutions which are consistently performing poorly. The system-level activities (IIMs, IITs, Good Governance) are accelerating and having a greater and greater impact. There are concerns, however, that fund flow delays continue and spending is being maintained but is no longer accelerating (and a number of the best performing institutions have spent all their allocation). III. INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 8. The Mission is pleased to see that MHRD/NPIU has effectively carried out the third institutional performance assessment of all TEQIP institutes (see Annex 3 for the full performance assessment). The assessment process continues to have a clear impact on project implementation, with state visits suggesting that institutions are taking the indicators seriously and that project implementing agencies find them useful, objective measures. 9. In the most recent performance assessment (as of Dec 19, 2014), the majority of first cycle institutions (143 of 167) are achieving 8-12 of the indicators, and institutions from the second cycle have also shown marked improvement from the last JRM (with the majority, 23 of 29, also meeting 8-12 of the indicators). 10. The following shows institutional performance at three levels: • • • 101 institutions reaching 11-12 indicators (high performers) 59 institutions reaching 8-10 indicators (middle performers) 30 institutions reaching below 7 indicators (low performers) 11. The MHRD/NPIU has only released additional funds if an institution has met all the latest set of performance indicators. 12. There are 19 institutions that have consistently been unable to achieve at least 60% of the indicators over the course of the past three institutional performance assessments (Dec 2013, April 2014 and Dec 2014). Those institutions are located in seven states (Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan, and Tripura). In addition, the state of Punjab has not released funds from MHRD for a long period; though institutions in the state continue to spend money from their own resources in anticipation of future releases. Recommendations • MHRD/NPIU should continue the practice of only releasing funds to institutions which have met all the performance indicators. However, participation in the AICTE- Page 3 CII survey should be excluded since it is no longer possible for an institution to fulfil this condition. • MHRD should take up the possibility of giving additional funds to high performing institutions that could use the resources effectively, as previously discussed. • MHRD should consider removing those institutions from the projectthat have not metall eleven of the October 2014 indicators by March 31, 2015. To help institutions meet those benchmarks, MHRD and NPIU can call on the mentors and performance auditors for additional support and guidance. • It is recommended to give all institutions a further set of performance indicators, to be met by April 30, 2015. The parameters could include: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. Autonomy (obtained or applied to UGC with no objection from university and state government) Minutes of meeting of Board of Governors taking place in last 4 monthspublished on the institution’s website NBA accreditation (55% accredited or applied for) Statutory audit completed Revised IDP for 2016 with updated target indicators and timeline for completion of governance development plan and/or institutional governance guidelines, approved by governing body and published on institutional website Commitment of 100% of funds received Expenditure of at least 50% of total funds received Procurement plan to cover 100% of planned procurement expenditures Completion of all data input into the MIS for 2013-14 IV. KEY ACTIVITIES 13. This JRM investigated in detail six specific issues: Equity, Employability, Centres of Excellence, Governance, Management and Faculty Development, and Mentoring and Performance Auditing. The following sections take each issue in turn and examine the current situation, outline the main issues and concerns, identify good practices that were found, and make recommendations. A. Equity Current Status 14. The third JRM held in April 2014 noted that TEQIP institutes had, in general, been conducting remedial education classes,with the vast majority of non-CFI TEQIP institutes having provisions for weaker and disadvantaged students as well as institute-level Equity Action Plans. Further, it confirmed that the transition rates for all students, as well as for students from disadvantaged backgrounds, had improved since the project became effective. The most recent data on transition ratesreceived from NPIU during this JRM continues to show a trend of improvement in transition rates. Page 4 Transition rates of UG students from first year to second year (%) 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 All students 55.38 59.83 65.13 Disadvantaged students 53.13 56.97 59.99 Source: NPIU. Figures for 2013-14 are not available yet as institutes are entering the data. Key Issues and Concerns 15. A number of the issues and concerns identified in the previous JRM remain pertinent, including (i) inadequate staff/teaching resources due to high vacancy rates; (ii) poor academic background of students in core areas of mathematics and physics (iii) the reluctance of students to attend remedial classes either because they are held over the weekend or because they are worried about the stigma associated with being a remedial student (noted only in the case of a handful of states); and (iv) weak ability to diagnose student learning levels and weaknesses at the start of the program. On attendance, the mission was informed that technical classes tend to suffer from low attendance (25-30 percent of those identified attend), whereas those focussing on personality development and soft skills tend to attract more students. 16. Three additional areas of concern need mention. First, almost all institutions administer student aptitude or psychometric tests. But most of these tests are developed and administered by institutions themselves, despite it being a complex and difficult task to design and implement these tests which cover a range of academic, personal and culture issues. Second, even where such tests are used, there is little diagnosis of the specific problems or challenges faced by categories of students, such as rural or women students. The follow-up action is a general set of remedial classes for all students. Further, a student’s specific challenges, such as dyslexia or depression, are rarely addressed. While teachers attend trainings, these trainings focus on technical areas, and not on addressing the differential needs of students. Third, the absence of a standardized mechanism to monitor the progress of students means there is little feedback on the effectiveness of different strategies employed by institutes. Institutes are monitoring progress as per the convenience and availability of resources. 17. The Equity Action Plan guidelines should be updated to include the following: (i) an expectation that diagnostic tests be administered before the semester starts in order to identify what kinds of assistance different types of students need; (ii) a standard model for tracking the progress of students at various stages of his/her academic tenure; and (iii) faculty development programs should include sessions on helping students with special needs achieve their learning goals. Good Practices 18. A significant effort was made toward sharing best policies and practices on improving transition rates through four regional conferences (Pantnagar, Coimbatore, Aurangabad and Bhubaneswar). These workshops discussed the methods used by institutes to identify weaker students; how student progress is tracked; key constraints faced by weaker students/those that drop out or do not pass exams; types of interventions conducted; and lessons learned, future plans and areas for improvement. Page 5 Recommendations 19. The recommendations made in the April 2014 JRM remain important. Additionally: • Equity Action Plan guidelines should be revised by NPIU with World Bank guidance by January 31, 2015. B. Employability 20. The yearly intake of engineering undergraduate students in India has grown substantial from 660.000 students in 2006-07 to 1.635.000 in 2013-141. The growth in the intake has however slowed substantially from a year-on-year rate of 32 per cent in 2009-10 to 4 per cent in 2013-14. 21. There are no official data on the number of graduates from engineering institutions (at Bachelors, Masters and PhD levels). A calculated estimate for undergraduate students is however available based on AICTE’s student intake data (please see the table below). The estimated number of graduates with an under-graduate engineering degree entering the job market in 2012-13 was 727.000. The number of graduates is calculated to increase to 962.000 students in 2014-15, corresponding to an increase of 31 per cent over the two years. It is very likely that the number of engineering graduates will grow significantly over the coming 3-5 years as an increasing number of enrolled engineer students will finalize their studies. Estimated Enrolment and Graduates Data for Engineering UG Students Student Level Student Student Student Graduates Enrolment Enrolment Graduates 2012-132 2014-15 Est. 2014-15 Est. 2012-13 Undergraduate 2.909.000 727.000 3.848.000 962.000 Engineers Source: http://www.dreducation.com/2014/06/graduate-data-india-student.html 22. The trend in the growth in the intake of the post-graduate students has been different than the UG students as can be seen from the table below. From the academic year 2006-2007 to 2009-2010 there was a growth in the number of post-graduate engineering institutions of only 9 per cent. However, the intake of post-graduate students has more than doubled from 2010-11 to 2013-2014. Again, though, it is not known how many places remain unfilled. 1 It is estimated that the student intake is typically about 20-25 per cent higher than the actual student enrollment in engineering institutions. 2 The number is the cumulated enrollment for B. Tech which average duration is four years. Page 6 Growth of the Intake of Engineering Post-Graduate Students in India 2006-07 to 2013-14 Year 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Engineering Post-graduate 23.000 23.000 23.000 25.000 30.000 33.000 51.000 63.000 Growth percentage 0% 0% 9% 20 % 10 % 55 % 24 % 23. In 2014, the World Bank and FICCI conducted a follow-up study to the 2009 survey on the employability of newly graduated engineers (please see Annex 7). The study showed a dramatic improvement in employer satisfaction levels. In 2009, only 36 per cent of employers were either very or extremely satisfied with newly graduated engineers. The picture has changed considerably in 2014 as 80 per cent of the employers were either very or extremely satisfied with the recent graduated engineers. Relative to 2009, there are far more engineers available for companies to choose from. Ninety-six per cent of the companies in the survey expressed little difficulty in hiring engineers. 24. CII-AICTE Survey: A total of 92 TEQIP II institutions participated in the CII-AICTE survey conducted in 2014. The survey focuses on industry-academia collaboration in existence in the institutions. The results are reflect a somewhat disappointing picture, with TEQIP results as follows: Total GREEN (above standards): 3 (3 percent of institutions) Total AMBER (meeting standards): 63 (69 percent) Total RED (below standards): 26 (28 percent) Key Issues and Concerns 25. At many of the visited engineering institutions, the placement rate for post-graduate students is less than half of the placement rate for undergraduate students. A major effort is therefore needed by the engineering institutions to improve the employability of their post-graduate students. 26. Only about half of TEQIP institutions participated in the CII-AICTE survey. This is a very useful benchmarking tool for institutions. More should be persuaded to participate next year. This would also allow over-time data to be gathered. 27. It is noted that there are several ways that institutions are using to calculate placement rates. Good Practices 28. Many engineering colleges seek to enhance the employability of students mainly through the placement cell alone. However, it is good practice for institutions to pursue a broader Page 7 strategy by continuously carrying out curriculum reforms; improving students’ soft and English skills; extra-curriculum student experiences; and engaging students in Industry Institute Interactions (IIIs). The IIIs need to have deeper engagements than guest lectures and curriculum development to increasingly include internships, R&D collaboration, entrepreneurship and consultancies that can result into better student experience. Further initiatives to increase the employability of students that can be taken are to make student internships mandatory and relate these to mainstream curriculum, give credit for courses taught by industry, and involve students in R&D projects. Recommendations • • • • It is suggested that NPIU in collaboration with World Bank will organize a workshop for institutions on good practices in enhancing students’ employability that would inform institutional Action Plans on Improving Students’ Employability both for UG and in particular for PG where placement rates are in general much lower. It is suggested that NPIU in collaboration with the World Bank will carry out a tracer study for TEQIP II. NPIU will develop guidelines on how to calculate placement rates. NPIU should discuss with CII and AICTE the participation of TEQIP institutions in the 2015 survey and in particular ensure access to the dataset of TEQIP institutions. C. Centres of Excellence Current status 29. Thirty Centres of Excellence (CoEs) among 27 TEQIP institutions have been selected to carry out collaborative and multi-disciplinary Research and Development (R&D) activities. Among the 27 selected institutions, seven are NITs, ten are government funded institutions, seven are government aided institutions, and three are private un-aided institutions. The selected institutions cover the following 13 research areas: 1) nanotechnology; 2) biotechnology; 3) biomedical engineering; 4) chemical engineering; 5) environmental engineering; 6) water resources engineering; 7) disaster management; 8) signal processing; 9) mechanical and material science; 10) process control; 11) data mining and computer sciences; 12) electronics systems; and 13) energy systems. 30. The 30 CoEs were peer reviewed in May and June 2014 by IIT professors to get constructive suggestions from senior peers on how best to carry forward the establishment of the CoEs which is new concept and activity to many of the TEQIP institutions. Three out of the 30 CoEs were asked to resubmit a more comprehensive plan to the peer reviewers for the development of their CoE. The JRM Team had the opportunity to meet and discuss with some of the leaders of the CoEs. In many cases, the CoEs had energized the faculty members and students around common R&D projects and also been able to build partnerships both with national and international researchers as well as with industry. 31. The specialised nature of the work taking place in CoEs means that it should not be expected that mentors (and performance auditors) would be able to support (evaluate) the work of the CoEs. Page 8 32. There are two key challenges that all the CoEs are facing. Firstly, the CoEs are expected to deliver research results that potentially can lead to new improved products or processes and commercialization. The process from research results, to piloting and testing the product or process, and to identify a potential market is challenging and not linear and it entails close collaboration between the researchers and financial and industrial partners. This process is new to many of the TEQIP institutions and evidence shows that in most cases research results will not directly lead to a marketable product or process. Secondly, it takes at least five years to build a good quality CoE. This implies that the CoEs should systematically seek other funding resources to sustain their activities. Good practices 33. The peer-reviewers identified several good practices in the 30 CoE proposals. Each CoE should be interdisciplinary, have a competent strong advisory board with leading researchers and relevant industrial partners. The CoE should be designed to address societal and technology problems that realistically can be addressed by the CoE and its national and international partners within the financial and time frame given. The CoEs should seek to develop new PG courses and programs with the field(s) of the CoE and do outreach and disseminations activities of its results to a large number of new potential research and industry partners. Recommendations • • • It is suggested to have two additional on-site visits by the already identified peerreviewers undertaken during the remaining period of TEQIP II. The first one could preferable take place in the fall of 2015 and the second towards to end of TEQIP II e.g., in June 2016. It is suggested that a common evaluation template should be developed by the NPIU in collaboration with the peer-reviewers that would use in their performance assessment of the CoEs. The 30 CoEs should seek additional funding sources beyond the end date of TEQIP II. The peer reviewers should evaluate these plans for sustainability during their visits. D. Governance Current Situation 34. The TEQIP Good Governance initiative was launched December 2012 as effective governance at all levels is one of the most important keys to the improvement of the quality of learning, teaching and research outcomes. There are three key outputs expected: for institutions to undertake a ‘self-review’ of their current governance practice; from the self-review identify governance development needs; and finally to set out institutional governance guidelines that would be shared publicly and thereby demonstrate a clear engagement with governance implementation and development. 35. One hundred and seventy-six TEQIP institutions out of 190 institutions have completed governance self-reviews by December 2014 up from 80 in December 2013. The number of TEQIP institutions that have prepared their initial governance development plans has Page 9 increased from one in December 2013 to 125 as of December 2014. There is not yet an account of how many institutions have finalized their governance guidelines, but the number is significantly fewer than the institutions have completed their Governance Guidelines Document (GGD). Number of self-reviews Number of governance development plans Source: NPIU December 2013 80 1 April 2014 162 15 December 2014 177 141 36. A number of Good Governance capacity building activities occurred during 2014. A TEQIP Good Governance web-site has been developed and is available on http://www.teqipgoodgovernance.in/index.html. The updating of the website will be done by NPIU as per the feedback from users. It has very rich material on good governance including the Good Practice Guide for Governing Board (the ‘Green Book’) and the Handbook for Mentors and Performance Auditors; as well as case studies of institutions with good governance practices such as the College of Engineering in Pune and BVBCET in Hubli. Three Good Governance Learning Forums for Head of Institutions and their Chairs of Governing Bodiestook place in October 2014. Representatives of 90 TEQIP institutions from 19 States and six SPFUs participated. The format was effective and the discussions were lively and engaged. It was clear that institutions were still at very varied stages in developing their governance and they faced substantial challenges in that task. 37. Based on the Learning Workshops and the institutional visits during the TEQIP JRM, it is estimated that possible around 20-25 percent of the TEQIP institutions have a good understanding and are taking advantage of the good governance activities to improve their governance performance. This is a significant improvement since the last JRM in April 2014. 38. Efforts to build synergies between the Management Capacity Enhancement Programme delivered by the seven IIMs and the Good Governance Programme under TEQIP should continue. This would include the following initiatives: 1) the TEQIP Good Governance web-site can be used as a common platform; 2) join effort to draft case students that demonstrate how TEQIP institutions are seeking to improve institutional governance and management; and 3) coordination between the mentor activities and the IIMs’ hands-on institutional advisory services to increase the value-added for the institutions. Key Issues and Concerns 39. The Expert Advisory Group Report on the Good Governance Programme highlights a number of constraints for implementing good governance for especially government engineering colleges that were illustrated during the October 2014 Learning Forums. Many regulatory issues such as a lack of genuine academic, administrative and financial autonomy make it a challenge for some institutions to significantly improve their governance and management performance. The table below gives an overview over the status of academic autonomy of TEQIP institutions. Currently, out of 190 institutions, 118 have obtained academic autonomy, while 72 institutions are at various stages of Page 10 processing their application to become academic autonomous institutions.Progress has overall been slow in terms of increasing the number of autonomous institutions from December 2013 to December 2014. Only 6 additional TEQIP institutions have obtained autonomous status from UGC over the last year. Participating TEQIP institutions Autonomous Yet to apply for Autonomy (2nd cycle of TEQIP II) Pending applications for autonomy • Applied to UGC for Autonomy, UGC assessment • Applied to University for Autonomy but not granted yet Source: NPIU December 2013 190 112 14 April 2014 190 115 9 December 2014 190 118 3 78 33 75 47 72 44 31 19 25 40. The mission met with the Chairman of UGC to discuss the autonomy applications from TEQIP institutions. It was agreed that NPIU will work with UGC on “fast tracking” the pending autonomy applications. UGC is also ready to receive suggestions from TEQIP institutions of 5-6 possible members for the appointment of a UGC representative to their Board of Governors (BoG). It was furthermore noted, that the State Government can nominate someone other than the Director of Technical Education for the BoG as it is very often difficult for the Director to join the BoG meetings of all the state engineering colleges. 41. During the Good Governance Learning Workshops, institutions expressed uncertainty about how best to develop important institutional development functions such as: strategic planning; institutional systems for monitoring quality; methods for benchmarking against other comparable institutions; methods of monitoring the performance of heads of institutions; creating a Register of Interests; and, approaches to assessing the effectiveness of governing bodies. 42. The Good Governance Programme has led to an important new set of conversations about governance. Two issues that came up repeatedly during the JRM: first, conflicts of interest of members of Governing Bodies, especially in the context of industry members whose companies provide internships to students but for a fee; and, second, of government or UGC nominees who do not participate actively in the Board. Good Practices 43. For all institutions the need to improve their governance and management practices will be an on-going agenda. The case studies of the good institutions demonstrate that institutional development takes time (often 6-8 years if the development needs are high), and that this can only be achieved effectively if certain conditions are in place such as a sufficient level of academic, administrative and financial autonomy as mention above. 44. The case studies of COEPune and BVBCET Hubliused in the Governance Forums show that good governance is inextricably linked to good leadership and efficient management. Page 11 Recommendations • • • The Good Governance activities should be scaled up by using the high quality learning material that has been developed through an on-line course version of the material. This would encourage and support self-learning and completion of the Good Governance Programme. It is suggested that NPIU will work with UGC on “fast tracking” the pending autonomy applications at UGC. For the appointment of UGC representatives to the Board of Governors at TEQIP institutions, it is suggested that the TEQIP institutions would make suggestions of 5-6 possible members for UGC’s consideration. NPIU will inform TEQIP institutions about their possibility. It is suggested that a specific Good Governance Learning Workshop will be organized for the CFI institutions and other the remaining institutions by NPIU with support from MHRD and the World Bank. E. Management and Faculty Development (IITs/ IIMs) Current Status 45. There are 7 IIMs offering management and leadership development and 8 IITs offering a variety of faculty development activities. These institutions have come into the TEQIP project at various times, but have all now signed agreements with MHRD to participate in the project. To date 994 people have been trained by IIMs and 1551 people (1466 faculty and 85 students) by IITs. Participation is accelerating. Both IIMs and IITs are planning to continue their activities for the period of the project extension. 46. The IIMs are working well together and have developed a core curriculum which is used by all the IIMs for the basic courses offered to institutions. Beyond these courses, IIMs are developing a range of additional support activities for institutions on request. The IIMs have envisaged separate offerings for heads of institutions, for other faculty and for administrative officers. The links with the Good Governance Programme have become strong. 47. The IITs are offering a more diverse set of activities, centred on specific subject areas, and driven by the availability of faculty in each IITs and the demand from TEQIP institutions. The strongest demand is for pedagogical training of faculty for undergraduate courses. Key Issues and Concerns 48. Both IIMs and IITs have raised concerns about attendance. It has been a struggle to get enough people to sign up and often those who register cancel at the last minute do not show up or send a more junior substitute. This has led to quite diverse profiles of the participants, which has made it harder to design effective programs catering to their needs. IIMs have found it especially hard to attract heads of institutions and other senior leaders: we would encourage the IIMs to be more rigorous about not accepting substitutes for the programs aimed at institutional leaders. Page 12 49. Neither the IIMs nor IITs have developed a framework for assessing the progress and impact of the work they are doing. 50. The IITs report that it has been harder to attract faculty to think beyond the narrow constraints of the existing curriculum, perhaps because of the lack of effective exercise of academic autonomy in TEQIP institutions. Incentives for faculty to be innovative are low. 51. The IIMs have started an important discussion about the sustainability of their activities. During the project period, they will develop a number of case studies (each IIM would commit to developing at least two so that the main institutional types can be covered). Two IIMs have also made a proposal to the MHRD to establish a leadership centre. Good Practices 52. Both the IIMs and the IITs have spent considerable efforts to identify the needs and interest of their respective institutions. 53. IIT Kharagpur has asked institutions to pay the cost of the course fee up front, with the promise that it will be reimbursed when the TEQIP participant completes the program. They report that this has increased participation. 54. Several IIMs have provided opportunities for TEQIP institutions to participate in international visits (to National University of Singapore and to Indiana University). IIMs have done a good job of ensuring these are meaningful events through intensive pre- and post-visit sessions in India. Recommendations • IIMs and IITs should develop a proposal for how to evaluate the effect of their programs. In the case of IIMs, this proposal might be a single methodology for all IIMs, while the IITs will develop separate indicators given the diversity of their offerings. This would be done by 15thFebruary 2015. • The geographical allocation of TEQIP institutions to particular IIMs and IITs should be removed, and individuals from any TEQIP institution should be able to participate in any program offered as suits their interests and availability. Courses would be placed on the IIMs’ and IITs’ websites, with a link from the NPIU and the Good Governance websites. The IIMs and IITs should work with the NPIU to develop a national database of those who have participated in order to more effectively advertise their offerings. With immediate effect. • IITs and IIMs should be able to offer their programs to non-TEQIP institutions (and charge an appropriate fee), subject to no TEQIP participant being turned away.With immediate effect. Page 13 F. Mentoring and Performance Auditing Current Status 55. Except for five institutes, every institute has completed at least the first round of mentoring. 111 institutes have completed the second round, 26 the third round, while only 10 have completed the fourth round. The first round of performance and data audits has been completed in 183 institutes, while the second round has been completed in 135 institutes. Only four institutes have completed the third round of performance and data auditing. Key Issues and Concerns 56. The mission is happy to note that the mentoring program is appreciated by institutes in general. Mentors have been engaging with faculty, staff and students informally, and providing advice on issues related to autonomy, accreditation, curriculum, industry linkages, working with the board of governors and employability. With a handful of exceptions, mentors were reported to interact regularly with the institute assigned to them. Despite widespread satisfaction with the mentoring program, mission meetings, however, indicate that the lack of exercise of autonomy and faculty shortages severely constrain mentors’ ability to guide institutes in a number of areas, such as curriculum and examinations reform. Mission meetings noted that participation in the mentoring program was being seen by institutes as a compliance issue, whereas it should be more need-based and demand driven. 57. Unlike mentorship, the experience of institutes with regard to performance auditing has been variable, with some performance audit reports being of high quality, but many not. In addition, a significant number of institutions have had difficulty scheduling performance audit visits. In order to ensure that performance audit reports were ofhigh quality and provided useful information to institutes, a review of performance audit reports was undertaken, beginning in July 2014. They were reviewed by experts on the following criteria: completeness; consistency and relevance; details and specificity; meticulousness; and feedback clarity. Ninety reports have been reviewed, with 32 reports graded as “A”, 37 reports graded as “B” and 21 report graded as “C”. All reports graded as “A” do not require revision, while reports graded as “B” require moderate revision, and those graded a “C” require the performance audit visit be repeated. This lack of consistency means that the public accountability of the performance audit (through publication of the performance audit reports) has not been possible. 58. The process of reviewing performance audit reports, including finding experts to review these reports and submit reports in a timely manner, has been tedious. As a result, the evaluation exercise was put on hold. Mission meetings discussed this issue and concluded that in order to be effective, the performance audit system should: (i) ensure all audits are undertaken within a narrow band of 1-2 months; (ii) allow for enough time to review the audit reports; (iii)design follow-up action based on the reports; and, (iv) document patterns in performance within and across institutes. 59. It is intended that the performance audit reports be made public. Any issue related to the disclosure of these reports, including those relating to confidentiality, should be resolved to facilitate the disclosure. Page 14 Good Practices 60. Mentoring has been especially successful where mentors have built personal relations with their institutes and faculty, and have interacted with institutes more frequently than expected by the project (i.e., more than twice a year). This flexibility is encouraged in the Handbook, but it appears to be practiced at present only in a minority of cases. Recommendations • The mission recommends that the practice of mentoring continue in its current form. It was decided that the current guidelines on the mentoring program continue without modification. • The performance audit system needs to be made more robust. At a minimum, there should be one performance audit conducted for each institute in 2016 to assess the performance of institutions at the end of the project. In the interim, a strong cadre of performance auditors should be built up by NPIU. NPIU should consider whether it is possible to build up a robust system in sufficient time to carry out two more rounds of performance audits. • Mentors and performance auditors who have not been able to meet their obligations to TEQIP II should be released from these obligations by NPIU. MHRD should make an effort to identify more people to serve of mentors and performance auditors by approaching directors of the IITs to suggest appropriate names. V. FACULTY/ STAFF AND STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEY 61. Infova Consultancy Services Limited was competitively selected in 2013 by MHRD for the design and administration of the web-based satisfaction survey for Student, Faculty and Staff members. Two rounds of web-based satisfaction survey for Student, Faculty and Staff members was successfully administered in TEQIP II institutions in August and October 2014, respectively. Both surveys received a high response rate. The mission would like to commend the work of Infova on the overall survey methodology, including design, administration, and collection of data and processing. 62. Pilot Survey (August 2014) - The pilot survey was administered with the objective of testing the overall functioning of survey including, compatibility with browsers, connectivity issues, survey administration and support mechanisms. Eight TEQIP institutions participated in this pilot from different regions. The selection of these eight institutions was done by NPIU/MHRD. The pilot was initially planned to be administered in the institutions for 2 weeks but was extended for an additional week upon request from institutions. Adequate support was provided to the participants in the institutions prior to the start of survey as well as during the administration of the survey in terms of presentations to institutes and helplines. The total number of participants were 7878 (faculty – 725, Technical Staff – 174, Non-technical Staff – 209, Students UG – 5895, Students PG – 731 and Students PhD.- 144). All technical observations reported by the participants, including issues with regard to application speed, browser compatibility, language setting, re-login for completion of survey etc. were successfully resolved before Page 15 the full survey was launched. Infova has also prepared a detailed report on the results/ findings from the pilot survey and a brief presentation on survey administration and results/ findings from the survey was presented to the mission members. Infova agreed to document all procedures undertaken for data quality checks. 63. A Student Satisfaction Index Score was also developed using the Principal Component Analysis methodology. However, it was proposed during the mission that a simpler calculation methodology will help institutions in understanding and interpreting the survey results. Any headline figures must be understandable and have in mind that in the longer run institutions themselves should be able to replicate the survey. It is proposed that the institute report card identify areas that survey respondents in an institute identify as important, and compare this with their satisfaction level in those areas. For the purpose of benchmarking, the report card could include information on the results of similar institutions (Govt/ Govt-aided, Private, CFIs), state, and national. 64. First full survey (October-November 2014) – The first full survey was administered between October 1 and November 15, 2014. The survey was initially planned for 30 days but was extended for 15 days upon request of the institutions. A total of 184 institutions (97%) participated in the survey. Of these, 157 institutions had a participation rate of 50% or above and 126 institutions had a participation rate of 70% or above. Currently, the validation of survey respondents is in progress after which the results will be analysed by Infova. Recommendations: • A report card should be produced for each institution, in addition to the national picture, that presents some of the main messages to the institution in a graphically attractive and useful manner. • It was recommended to include a separate question on “overall satisfaction” in each survey. This can be included from next survey round. In addition, Infova should analyse the survey instrument and responses to see if the survey can be shortened to reduce the time it takes to fill in. • The mission recommends two additional rounds of survey until the end of project (September 2015 and September 2016). This timeline will provide an opportunity to the institutions to review results from the previous survey and take corrective actions in important areas before the administration of the next survey round. VI. MONITORING AND EVALUATION 65. Some end-of-project targets in the Results Framework were adjusted upwards as part of the restructuring (September 2014) to extend the closing date of project. The mission is pleased to note that the project is continuing to make progress in all key performance indicators. One-hundred and fifty six institutions are now reporting on at least 70% of the indicators. NPIU should continue to follow-up and help institutions in completing the data-entry. 66. Intermediate Outcome Indicator on “Satisfaction Index of Student and Faculty”: It was agreed that the satisfaction index from the first full round of survey will be calculated Page 16 to compare to the baseline. This will be done once the data validation is completed and will be reported in the next mission/ Implementation Status and Results Report. 67. It is recommended that the data auditors should continue to verify the data that the institutions have entered in the MIS and NPIU should continue to follow-up to ensure that necessary corrections are made in the MIS. Recommendations: • NPIU uses the data audit report received to verify the data in the MIS (continuous) • NPIU to freeze the data for 2010-11 and 2011-12 for the remaining 34 institutions (by December 31, 2014) and also freeze the data for 2012-13 by March 31, 2015. • NPIU continues to provide hands-on-support and training to institutes on MIS (especially in institutions with high turn-over in staff designated for data-entry) 68. The Results Framework Document is updated (as per Annex 4) VII. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 69. 70. The JRM’s primary focus area remained assessing the timeliness and effectiveness of fund flows and expenditures. The JRM team would like to highlight that there still remains instance of fund transfers taking inordinately long time, say more than 120 days. This may have substantial impacts on project activities. In this regard, the mission would like to suggest the following to facilitate timely budget allotments and fund releases at the State and SPFU level: • timely communication of the indicative program budgets to states, so that these can be reflected in the respective state budgets appropriately; • timely communication of the fund release by MHRD to the respective state and SPFU counterparts; • active engagement of SPFUs in complying and following-up with the various State procedural requirements involved in release of funds from respective treasuries; • proactive planning by SPFUs to enable speedy usage/transfers of funds, once received in their Bank accounts. • Proactive steps by the institutes in complying with the various disbursement linked performance/ financial benchmarks. Certain steps have been taken by the project to respond to the recommendations made by the last JRM [April-2014] have resulted in some improvements. However, significant opportunities do remain for strengthening the financial management control framework, including: • appropriate staffing and effective capacity building of finance and accounting staff; • enhancement of the computerized financial management system; • effective integration of External, Internal and Performance Audits; Page 17 71. • timely follow-up of the audit observations; • effective monitoring and supervision support by NPIU; • improved internal control environment at SPFUs and at the institutes. For more details, please refer Annex 9. VIII. PROCUREMENT 72. The status of procurement as planned for the entire project period was discussed during the JRM and the agreed action plan from last mission was also reviewed. Procurement team of NPIU provided a national summary of procurement status under TEQIP II project. 73. All the procurement under TEQIP II is being done through PMSS with very few exceptions and as of end- Nov 14,the expenditure reported under procurement is Rs. 329.77 Cr as per PMSS and Rs. 437.27 cr as per FMS. The difference of Rs. 107 cr between PMSS and FMS is due to some payments not updated in PMSS by the participating institutions.At the end of November 2014, contracts worth Rs. 242.83 cr are committed and for Rs. 135.5 cr worth of cases, the procurement is “in pipeline” i.e. at various stages of procurement. Further at the end of November 2014, it is planned to procure goods worth Rs. 286.98 Cr for which the procurement action is yet to be initiated. Given that there is a limit on how much each institution can spend on procurement activities, these figures mean that all funds for procurement have now been spent or allocated to specific activities. 74. Procurement Post Review (PPR) FY 15: For the PPR FY 14 the PPR report was shared with NPIU and compliance to PPR comments are received from the institutes. JRM was advised by the Project that GPCL, the authorized agency of World Bank has already conducted the PPR for the current FY and they will be submitting their report shortly, which will be shared with the institutions through NPIU for their compliance. 75. Complaint Handling. The JRM informed the Procurement staff of NPIU about the mandatory requirement of Bank’s review of the complaints and their resolution. Project should submit the details of procurement complaints if any, with actions taken on it to Bank for review and its closer. 76. Project was explained about importance of submitting final contract copy with check list for all prior review cases to Bank for getting WBR no. 77. For more details, please refer Annex 8. IX. ENVIRONMENT 78. Four regional workshops were conducted between May 2014 and August 2014 to monitor the compliance of Environment Management Framework in all project institutions and to ensure implementation of corrective actions, as required. NPIU has prepared a report to highlight the findings/ suggestions from these workshops. Page 18 Name Date Western (Ahmedabad) Northern (Chandigarh) Eastern (Kolkata) Southern (Coimbatore) May 26-27, 2014 June 17-18, 2014 July3-4, 2014 August 20-21, 2014 No. of No. of participating participating institutions states 5 45 8 39 6 50 3 56 X. SOCIAL 79. Over the year, the NPIU conducted 4 workshops on the topic of ‘Improving transition rates of students’ covering the regions of South, West, North and East. Following the successful conduct of workshops, the NPIU now proposes to conduct a second round of workshops during 2015, giving time and prominence to this very important issue and allowing institutions that were not covered the opportunity to participate. Based on the lessons learned, the Bank has undertaken to support NPIU in updating the Equity Action Plan that was prepared before project approval. Recommendations • The Equity Action Plan guidance should be updated before the second round of regional workshops is held. XI. PROJECT MANAGEMENT 80. Since the last Joint Review Mission, the Central Project Advisor’s term has come to an end. There are effective temporary arrangements in place while the position is being advertised. Clearly securing an effective CPA is a high priority task. 81. The NPIU/MHRD have recently recruited a number of new staff to the NPIU. By the end of this recruitment, all consultant positions will have been filled with the exception of two positions. These two positions need to be advertised. The NPIU also needs to move forward on the recruitment of a statistician. 82. Project Implementation Plan (PIP). The World Bank team reviewed a draft revision of the PIP. The main issues discussed during the mission were: • Permissible and non-permissible activities: The underlying principle of the TEQIP project is that institutions and their Board of Governors are responsible for making decisions about which activities to carry out. This implies that while there needs to be a list of proscribed (‘non-permissible’) activities, institutions should understand that all other activities can be undertaken. The PIP provides some illustrative examples of possible activities which institutions may wish to undertake, but these examples do not exhaust all the activities which are permissible. The wording of the PIP should make this clear. Page 19 • International travel: All institutions expressed concern that the current guidelines require too many layers of approval, which have the effect of seriously reducing the possibility that all the permissions will be obtained in time to participate in planned travel. The Boards of Governors should be able to make effective choices about the use of project funds on international travel, provided they have shown effective use of existing funds. It therefore seems reasonable to empower those Boards of Governors of institutions which have met all the required performance indicators; other institutions would continue to need additional permissions from authorities outside the institution. • Non-TEQIP institutions. The purpose of TEQIP is to provide models of effective practices, which can be adopted by other engineering (indeed, all higher education) institutions in India. Non-TEQIP institutions should therefore be encouraged to participate in TEQIP-sponsored activities, including IIM and IIT activities (as noted above) but also programs organised by SPFUs and institutions themselves. In this way, good practices can spread more widely. The only restriction should be that no TEQIP participant should be denied participation in these events on account of nonTEQIP participants filling the available spaces. XII. SUSTAINABILITY AND WIDER ADOPTION OF TEQIP PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES 83. The remaining project period is a key time to document the lessons learnt and disseminate them widely. NPIU should, therefore, develop a plan of action to capture lessons across the range of TEQIP activities and disseminate them to different audiences. It is especially important the state governments are engaged. Recommendations • The next JRM should discuss ways in which activities to promote the sustainability and wider adoption of TEQIP procedures and practices can be planned during the remaining project period XIII. STATUS OF ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN REPORT FROM PREVIOUS JRM 84. These are described in detail in Annex 5. XIV. NEW ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM THIS JRM 85. These are listed in Annex 6. Page 20 INDIA Technical Engineering Educational Quality Improvement II (TEQIP-II) Fourth Joint Review Mission December 8-19, 2014 Annexures Page 1 Annex 1: People and Institutions participating in the Joint Review Mission Joint Review Mission Team Members Government Nominees for the JRM Team • • • • • • Prof Anil D Sahasrabudhe, Director, College of Engg, Pune Prof Ashok Shettar, Director, BVB College of Engg & Tech, Hubli Prof R N Herkal, Director, Basaveshwar Engg College, Bagalkoat Prof S Y Kulkarni, Director, M S Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Banglore Dr Manoj Arora, Director, PEC University of Technology, Chandigarh Prof S Mishra, Director, Govt College of Engg, Jalgaon World Bank Nominees for the JRM Team: • Mr. Toby Linden, Lead Education Specialist and Task Team Leader • Mr. Kurt Larsen, Senior Education Specialist • Ms. Tara Beteille, Economist • Ms. Karthika Radhakrishnan, Operations Analyst • Ms. Ling Jessica Diana Lee, Operations Officer • Mr. Satyanarayan Panda, Procurement Specialist • Ms. Supriti Dua, Financial Management Specialist • Ms. Asha Bhagat, Consultant, Financial Management • Ms Ritu Sharma, Program Assistant Other people and institutions MHRD/NPIU Officials: • • • • • • • • • • • Mr Amarjit Sinha, IAS, Additional Secreatry (T) & NPD, TEQIP Ms Tripti Gurha Director (TC), MHRD Dr Rita Goyal, Sr Consultant, Dr Yogesh Srivastava, Sr Consultant, Mr N S Agnihotri, Sr Consultant, Mr Scahin Gupta, Consultant, Mr Anup Mehrotra, Consultant, Mr Bhanu Partap Singh, Consultant, Dr Uma Bansal, Assoc. Consultant, Dr Prakash Kumiyal, Assoc. Consultant, Ms Rupali Jha, Assoc. Consultant Page 2 List of Mentor & Performance Auditors • • • • • Prof. J. Srihari Rao, Former Professor & Dean, NIT Warangal Prof. R. Natarajan, Former Director, IIT Madras, Former Chairman, AICTE Prof. B.S. Sonde, Chairman, All India Board of UG Studies in E & T (AICTE) Prof. N.C. Shivaprakash, Professor, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore Prof. B.K. Raghu Prasad, Advisor, IISC, Bangalore List of Programme Coordinators from IITs and IIMs • • • • • • • • • • • Prof. Pradeep Yammiyaar, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Prof. Pradeep Kumar, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Prof. O.P.Sha, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Prof. Vikram M. Gadre, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Prof. C.S.Upadhyay, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Prof. Mahim sagar, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi Prof. V. Gopal, Indian Institute of Management, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI Mr Mandar Nayak, Indian Institute of Management, Udaipur Prof. Saji Gopinath, Indian Institute of Management, Kozhikode Prof. Poonam Sahgal, Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow Prof. Sanjeev Prashar, Indian Institute of Management, Raipur List of CFIs: • • • • • • • • Assam University-TS School of Technology Silchar: Sudipta Roy, Sudipto Sarkar NERIST Itanagar: PK Das NIT Calicut: GRC Reddy, AT Mathew NIT Hamirpur: Vijay Shankar, Amit Kaul NIT Jalandhar: AK Choudhary NIT Jamshedpur: YP Yadav NIT Patna: AR Quaff NIT Raipur: S Sanyal, Ajay Sharma List Of States Participated in Wrap Up meeting: • • • • • • • Andhra Pradesh Gujarat Himachal Pradesh Karnataka Madhya Pradesh NCT of Delhi Rajasthan • • • • • • • Chhatisgarh Haryana Jharkhand Kerala Maharashtra Punjab Telangana Page 3 • • • Tamil Nadu UT-Chandigarh Uttarakhand • • • West Bengal UT-Puduchery Uttar Pradesh Page 4 Annex 2: Mission Schedule Date Meeting/Purpose Venue Monday 8th Dec 2014 2.00 PM MHRD/Additional Secretary ‐ Orientation for mission members ‐ Agree main issues for review MHRD 9.30 AM – 1.00 PM 1.00-1.30 PM Project progress overview ‐ KPIs ‐ Institutional performance assessment ‐ Procurement – including spending projections ‐ FM – including fund flows/releases ‐ Action Taken Report Lunch Break Tuesday 9th Dec 2014 Travel to States (AP, Telangana, HR and Rajasthan) Silver Oak-II, IHC, New Delhi State visit ‐ Overview of state issues ‐ Interaction with institutions Wednesday 10th Dec 2014 State visit ‐ Visit 2 institutions, including one COE Thursday 11th Dec 2014 State visit ‐ Visit one institution Details as in Appendix‐A‐D Travel to Delhi/respective destination Friday 12th Dec 2014 9.30 AM 1.00 PM IIMs ‐ Plans for project extension period on leadership, management and governance ‐ Future of good governance program ‐ M&E of activities IITs ‐ Plans for project extension period on improving teaching and research (including Quality Circles and QEEE) ‐ M&E of activities WB WB Page 5 Monday 15th Dec 2014 9.30 AM 2.00 PM Mentors and Performance Auditors ‐ Plans for extension period Tuesday 16th Dec 2014 Meeting with NBA Seminar Hall – 3, IIC, New Delhi Centres of Excellence ‐ Review of progress Faculty, staff and student surveys ‐ Report on progress/findings Wrap up meeting with MHRD MHRD Wednesday 17th Dec 2014 Meeting with UGC Preparation of Aide Memoire Thursday 18th Dec 2014 Meeting with CFIs 3.00-5.00 PM Friday 19th Dec 2014 9.30 AM Wrap up with State Governments ‐ Discussion of Aide Memoire ‐ Feedback on state progress ‐ Discussion of faculty transfers Lecture Room - 2, (Basement), IIC Page 6 Appendix-A S.No 1 Date 9th December 2014 State/Institute(s) to be visited Hyderabad, Telangana 2 3 10th December JNTU, 2014 (FN) Hyderabad, 4 10th December Osmania 2014 (AN) University College Technology, Hyderabad 5 11th December 2014 (FN) 6 11th December 2014 (AN) Proposed activity Presentation on Overview of the State issues for 20 min followed by 10 min discussion Interaction with all 14 institutions – ppt for 10 min on the progress of the Project – issues therein - followed by 10 min discussion Detailed presentation on all aspects of the Project (Academic, Procurement and Financial) including CoE Detailed presentation on all aspects of the Project of (Academic, Procurement and Financial) including CoE Venue To decided be Institute Institute VNR Vignan Detailed presentation on all Institute Jyothi Institute of aspects of the Project Engg & (Academic, Procurement and Technology, Financial) Hyderabad Travel back to Delhi Appendix-B S.No 1 2 3 Date State/Institute(s) to be Proposed activity Venue visited Visit to Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh A U College of Detailed presentation on all Institute Engineering, Andhra aspects of the Project (Academic, 9th December University, Procurement and Financial) 2014 including CoE Visakhapatnam Gayatri Vidya Parishad Detailed presentation on all Institute College of Engineering, aspects of the Project (Academic, Madhurawada, Procurement and Financial) Visakhapatnam Page 7 4 5 6 7 8 10th December Visit to Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh 2014 10th December JNTU College of Detailed presentation on all Institute 2014 (FN) Engineering, Kakinada aspects of the Project (Academic, Procurement and Financial) 10th December Travel to Hyderabad 2014 (AN) 11th December Hyderabad, Andhra Presentation on Overview of the To be 2014 (AN) Pradesh State issues for 20 min followed decided by 10 min discussion 11th December Interaction with all 11 Interaction with all 11 institutions 2014 (FN) institutions – ppt for 10 – ppt for 10 min on the progress min on the progress of of the Project – issues therein the Project – issues followed by 10 min discussion therein - followed by 10 min discussion 11th December Travel back to Delhi 2014 (AN) Appendix-C S.No 1 2 3 4 5 6 Date State/Institute(s) to Proposed activity be visited 9th Dec 2014 Visit to Chandigarh, Presentation on Overview of the Haryana State issues for 20 min followed by 10 min discussion Interaction with all 6 institutions – ppt for 10 min on the progress of the Project – issues therein followed by 10 min discussion th 10 Dec 2014 Faculty of Science, Detailed presentation on all aspects of the Project (Academic, (FN) Kurukshetra Procurement and Financial) University, Kurukshetra 10th Dec 2014 UIET, Kurukshetra Detailed presentation on all (AN) University, aspects of the Project (Academic, Kurukshetra Procurement and Financial 11th Dec 2014 Faculty of Detailed presentation on all (FN) Engineering & aspects of the Project (Academic, Procurement and Financial) Technology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science & Technology, Murthal 11th Dec(AN) Travel back to Delhi Venue To decided be Institute Institute Institute Page 8 Appendix-D S.No 1 2 3 4 5 Date State/Institute(s) to Proposed activity be visited 9th December Visit to Jaipur, Presentation on Overview of 2014 Rajasthan the State issues for 20 min followed by 10 min discussion Interaction with all 9 institutions – ppt for 10 min on the progress of the Project – issues therein - followed by 10 min discussion th Detailed presentation on all 10 December Ajmer aspects of the Project 2014 (FN) Government Engineering College, (Academic, Procurement and Financial) Ajmer Detailed presentation on all 10th December Government Woman aspects of the Project 2014 (AN) Engineering College, (Academic, Procurement and Ajmer Financial 10th December Travel to Alwar 2014 th Detailed presentation on all 11 December of the Project 2014 (FN) Institute of aspects Engineering & (Academic, Procurement and Financial Technology, Alwar 11th December 2014 (AN) Venue To be decided Institute Institute Travel to Delhi Page 9 Annex 3: Performance Assessment Indicators of Institutions 1 2 3 Autonom y (Yes/No) Yes = obtained or applied for MoM of BoG (last 4 Months) published on institution' s website (Yes/No) Governanc e Self Review Submitted (Yes/No) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Governance developmen t plan Submitted (Yes/No) NBA Accreditatio n (% accredited + applied for) (≥ 50% = Yes) Statutor y Audit (2013‐ 14) (Yes/No) 2nd Performanc e Auditing (Yes/No) Yes= Performanc e + Data Auding MIS Data Entry Status (Yes= Adequate, No= Inadequate ) Participatio n in CII‐ AICTE Survey (Yes/No) Participatio n Faculty, Staff & Students satisfaction Survey (≥ 50% = Yes) Procuremen t Plan to cover 100% procuremen t expenditure (Yes/No) % of Expenditur e against total funds received ( ≥ 50% = Yes) % of Expenditur e+ Committed expenditur e against Total funds recieved (100% = Yes) Indicator s Met S. N. Name of the State/UT Categor y of the Instituti on Name of the Institution 1 Andhra Pradesh Private unaided Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College, Chittoor Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 2 Andhra Pradesh Govt. A U College of Engineering, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 3 Andhra Pradesh Private unaided VR Siddhartha Engineering College, Kanuru, Vijaywada 4 Andhra Pradesh Private unaided 5 Andhra Pradesh Private unaided 6 Andhra Pradesh Private unaided 7 Andhra Pradesh Private unaided 8 Andhra Pradesh Private unaided 9 Andhra Pradesh Govt. Aditya Institute of Technology & Management, Tekkali, Srikakulam Shri Vishnu Engineering College for women, Vishnupur, Bhimavaram Gayatri Vidya Parishad College of Engineering, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam GITAM Institute of Technology ‐ GITAM University , Vishakhapatnam Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalle SVU College of Engineering, Tirupati Page 10 Govt. JNTU College of Engineering, Kakinada Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 10 11 Andhra Pradesh Govt. JNTU College of Engineering, Pulivendula, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 12 Bihar Govt. Bhagalpur College of Engineering, Bhagalpur Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No 1 13 Bihar Govt. Muzaffarpur Institute of Technology, Muzaffarpur Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No 1 14 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI IIEST Shibpur Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 15 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI ISM Dhanbad Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 16 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NERIST Itanagar Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes 6 17 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Agartala Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 9 18 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Allahabad Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 9 19 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Bhopal Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 20 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Calicut Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 21 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Durgapur Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 22 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Hamirpur Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 23 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Jaipur Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 24 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Jalandhar Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No 7 25 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Jamshedpur Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 26 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Kurukshetra Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 8 10 Andhra Pradesh Page 11 27 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Nagpur Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 28 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Patna Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes 5 29 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Raipur Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 7 30 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Rourkela Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 9 31 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Silchar Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 32 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Surat Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 33 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Surathkal Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 34 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Tiruchirapally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 35 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NIT Warangal Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 36 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI NITTTR Chandigarh Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 37 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI School of Technology–Assam University Silchar Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No 5 38 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI SLIET Sangrur Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 39 Centrally Funded Institutions CFI ZH College of Engg & Tech–AMU Aligarh Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 40 Chhattisgarh Govt. Government Engineering College, Bilaspur Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No 5 41 Chhattisgarh Private unaided Rungta College of Engineering & Technology, Bhilai Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No 1 42 Chhattisgarh Govt. Government Engineering College, Jagdalpur, Bastar Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No 5 43 Chhattisgarh Govt. Government Engineering College, Raipur Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No 1 Page 12 44 Gujarat Govt. Government Engineering College, Bhavnagar Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 45 Gujarat Govt. aided Birla Vishvakarma Mahavidyalaya, Vallabh Vidynagar Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 46 Gujarat Govt. Government Engineering College, Patan, Gujarat Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 47 Gujarat Govt. Government Engineering College, Rajkot, Gujarat Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 48 Gujarat Govt. Shantilal Shah Engg. College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 49 Gujarat Govt. Lukhidhirji Engg. College, Morbi, Gujarat Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 50 Gujarat Govt. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 51 Haryana Govt. Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No 5 52 Haryana Private unaided Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes 6 Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 6 Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes 6 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 53 Haryana Govt. aided 54 Haryana Govt. 55 Haryana Govt. 56 Haryana Govt. 57 Himachal Pradesh Govt. Government Engineering College, Gandhinagar, Gujarat University Institute of Engineering & Technology, MDU, Rohtak N.C College of Engineering, Panipat Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Guru Jambeshwar University of Science & Technology, Hissar Faculty of Science, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra University Institute of Engineering & Technology (UIET), Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science & Technology, Murthal, Sonipat Jawaharlal Nehru Government Engineering College, Sundernagar, Mandi Page 13 58 Jharkhand Govt. aided BIT, Mesra Ranchi Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 59 Jharkhand Private unaided Cambridge Institute of Technology, Ranchi Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 10 60 Karnataka Private unaided Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 61 Karnataka Govt. aided Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 62 Karnataka Private unaided Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology (NMIT Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 63 Karnataka Govt. University Visvesvaraya College of Engg., Bangalore Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 64 Karnataka Govt. aided BVB College of Engineering & Technology Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 65 Karnataka Govt. aided National Institute of Engineering, Mysore Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 66 Karnataka Govt. aided Malnad College of Engineering, Hassan, Karnataka Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 67 Karnataka Govt. aided BMS College of Engineering, Bangalore, Karnataka Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 68 Karnataka Govt. aided Sri Siddhartha Institute of Technology, Tumkur Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 69 Karnataka Govt. aided Basaveshwar Engineering College (Autonomous) Bagalkot Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 70 Karnataka Govt. aided PES college of engineering Mandya Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 71 Karnataka Govt. aided Sri Jayachamarajendra College of Engineering, Mysore Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 72 Karnataka Private unaided PES institute of technology, Bangalore Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 73 Karnataka Private unaided PDA College of Engineering, Gulbarga Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 11 Siddhaganga Institute of Technology, Tumkur, Karnataka Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bangalore Page 14 74 Karnataka Private unaided 75 Karnataka Private unaided 76 Karnataka Govt. 77 Karnataka Private unaided 78 Karnataka 79 MS Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Bangalore SDM College of Engineering and Technology, Dhavalagiri, Dharwad Sri Krishnarajendra Silver Jubilee Technological Institute (SKSJTI) Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 R.V. College of Engineering (RVCE), Bangalore Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Private unaided NMAM Institute of Technology, Nitte Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Kerala Govt. Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology, Kottayam Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 80 Kerala Govt. Government College of Engineering, Kannur Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 11 81 Kerala Govt. Government Engineering College, Thrissur Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 82 Kerala Govt. Government Engineering College, Kozhikode Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 83 Kerala Govt. Government Engineering College, Painavu, Idukki Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 84 Kerala Govt. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 85 Kerala Govt. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 86 Kerala Govt. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 87 Kerala Govt. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 School of Engineering, Cochin University of Science & Technology, Cochin Government Engineering College, Bartonhill, Thiruvananthapura m LBS Institute of Technology for Women, Poojappura, Thiruvananthapura m College of Engineering Perumon, Perinad, Kollam Page 15 88 Kerala Govt. aided 89 Kerala Govt. 90 Kerala Govt. 91 Kerala Govt. 92 Kerala Govt. 93 Kerala Govt. 94 Kerala Govt. 95 Kerala Govt. 96 Kerala Govt. 97 Kerala Govt. 98 Madhya Pradesh Govt. aided 99 Madhya Pradesh Private unaided 10 0 Madhya Pradesh 10 1 Madhya Pradesh Cooperative Institute of Technology, Vadakara, Kozhikode College of Engineering Trikaripur, Cheemeni, Kasargod Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Sagar Institute of Research & Technology, Bhopal Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Govt. aided Madhav Institute of Technology & Science, Gwalior Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Govt. aided Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidhyalaya, Bhopal Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No 6 College of Engineering Thalassery, Kannur College of Engineering, Kidangoor, Kottayam Government Engineering. College, wayanad Thalappuzha, Kerala Thangal Kunju Musaliar College of Engineering,Karicod e, Government Engineering. College, Sreekrishnapuram, Kerala College of Engineering, Adoor, Manakkala, Kerala College of Engineering, Karunagappaly, Thodiyoor, Kollam, Kerala College of Engineering, Cherthala, Pallippuram, Alappuzha, Kerala Samrat Ashok Technological Institute (Engineering College), Vidisha Page 16 Madhya Pradesh Govt. aided Shri GS Institute of Technology & Science, Indore Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 10 3 Maharashtra Govt. aided Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere, Raigad Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 10 4 Maharashtra Govt. College of Engineering, Shivajinagar, Pune Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 10 5 Maharashtra Govt. aided Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering & Technology, Nanded Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 10 6 Maharashtra Govt. aided Walchand College of Engineering, Sangli Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 10 7 Maharashtra Govt. aided BVB's Sardar Patel College of Engineering, Mumbai Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 10 8 Maharashtra Govt. Govt. College of Engineering, Aurangabad Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 10 9 Maharashtra Govt. aided Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute, Matunga, Mumbai Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 11 0 Maharashtra Govt. Government College of Engineering, Jalgaon Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 11 1 Maharashtra Govt. Govt. College of Engineering, Amravati Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 11 2 Maharashtra Govt. Government College of Engineering, Karad Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 11 3 Maharashtra Private unaided Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, Islampur, Sangli Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 11 4 Maharashtra Govt. aided Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga, Mumbai Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 11 5 Maharashtra Private unaided Bharati Vidyapeeth University, College of Engineering, Pune Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 11 6 Maharashtra Private unaided GH Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 11 11 7 Maharashtra Govt. Government College of Enginering, Chandrapur Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 10 2 Page 17 11 8 Maharashtra Govt. 11 9 Maharashtra Govt. 12 0 NCT‐Delhi Govt. 12 1 Odisha Govt. 12 2 Odisha Govt. 12 3 Punjab Govt. aided 12 4 Punjab Govt. aided 12 5 Punjab Govt. aided 12 6 Punjab Private unaided 12 7 Punjab Govt. aided 12 8 Punjab Govt. Department of Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, Maharashtra Department of Chemical Technology, North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon, Maharashtra Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 10 Thapar University, Patiala, Punjab Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 6 Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana, Punjab Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 GZS‐PTU, Bhatinda, Punjab Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes No No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes 5 Delhi Technological University, Delhi College of Engineering & Technology, Bhubaneshwar Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology, Burla, Sambalpur SBS College of Engineering & Technology, Ferozpur, Punjab Chandigarh Engineering College, Mohali, Punjab Beant College of Engineering Technology, Gurdaspur, Punjab 12 9 Punjab Govt. College of Agriculture Engineering and Technology, Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana, Punjab 13 0 Punjab Govt. Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes 4 13 1 Rajasthan Govt. Govt. Engineering College, Bikaner, Rajasthan Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes 6 13 2 Rajasthan Govt. University College of Engineering, RTU, Kota, Rajasthan Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 7 Page 18 13 3 Rajasthan Private unaided Institute of Engineering & Technology, Alwar, Rajasthan Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 10 13 4 Rajasthan Govt. M L V Textile & Engineering College, Bhilwara, Rajasthan Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 8 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 13 5 Rajasthan Govt. College of Technology and Engineering, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 13 6 Rajasthan Govt. Govt Engineering College, Ajmer, Rajasthan 13 7 Rajasthan Govt. 13 8 Rajasthan Govt. 13 9 Rajasthan Govt. Government Engineering College, Jhalawar, Rajasthan Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No 5 14 0 Tamil Nadu Govt. Govt. College of Engineering, Baragur, Krishnagiri Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 14 1 Tamil Nadu Govt. Govt. College of Technology, Coimbatore Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 College of Engineering and Technology, Bikaner, Rajasthan Government Women Engineering College, Ajmer, Rajasthan 14 2 Tamil Nadu Govt. Alagappa Chettiar College of Engineering and Technology, Karaikudi 14 3 Tamil Nadu Govt. Government College of Engineering, Salem 14 4 Tamil Nadu Govt. 14 5 Tamil Nadu Govt. 14 6 Tamil Nadu Govt. Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Abishekapatti, Tirunelveli Thiagaraja College of Engineering, Madurai, Tamil Nadu P.S.G College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu Page 19 14 7 Tamil Nadu Govt. 14 8 Tamil Nadu Govt. 14 9 Telangana Private unaided 15 0 Telangana Govt. 15 1 Telangana Govt. 15 2 Telangana Govt. 15 3 Telangana Private unaided 15 4 Telangana Private unaided 15 5 Telangana Private unaided 15 6 Telangana Private unaided 15 7 Telangana Private unaided 15 8 Telangana Private unaided 15 9 Telangana Private unaided Bharathidasan Institute of Technology Campus, Trichirapalli, Tamil Nadu Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu Aurora's Scientific, Technological & Research Academy, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad JNTUH College of Engineering, Hyderabad University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad University College of Technology, Osmania University, Hyderabad Anurag Engineering College, Kodad, Nalgonda Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology, Gandipet, Hyderabad Gokaraju Rangaraju Institute of Engineering & Technology, Kukatpally, Hyderabad Vasavi College of Engineering, Ibrahimbagh, Hyderabad Vallurupalli Nageswara Rao Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engg. &Technology, Hyderabad Malla Reddy Engineering College, Medchal, R.R. District, Hyderabad Sreenidhi Institute of Science & Technology, Ghatkesar, Hyderabad Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 9 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 11 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 10 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes 9 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Page 20 16 0 Telangana Govt. 16 1 Telangana Govt. 16 2 Tripura Govt. 16 3 UT‐ Chandigarh Govt. 16 4 UT‐ Chandigarh Govt. 16 5 UT‐ Chandigarh Govt. 16 6 UT‐ Puducherry Govt. 16 7 Uttar Pradesh Govt. 16 8 Uttar Pradesh Govt. 16 9 Uttar Pradesh Private unaided 17 0 Uttar Pradesh Govt. aided 17 1 Uttar Pradesh Govt. aided 17 2 Uttar Pradesh Govt. aided University College of Engineering, Kakatiya University, Kothagudem JNTU Institute of Science & Technolgy, Hyderabad No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No 4 Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No 5 Tripura Institute of Technology, Narsingarh, Tripura No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 5 PEC University of Technology, Chandigarh Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes 6 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 9 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 University Institute of Engineering & Technology, Chandigarh Dr. S.S. Bhatnagar University Institute of Chemical Engineering and Technology UICET), Punjab University, Chandigarh, UT‐ Chandigarh Pondicherry Engineering College, Puducherry Institute of Engineering & Technology, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh Madan Mohan Malviya Engineering College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh School of Engineering & Technology, IFTM University, Lodhipur Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh Harcourt Butler Technological Institute, (HBTI), Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh Faculty of Engineering and Technology, M.J.P. Rohilkhand University, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh Bundelkhand Institute of Engg. & Technology, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh Page 21 17 3 Uttar Pradesh Govt. aided Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 17 4 Uttarakhand Govt. aided Govind Ballabh Pant Engineering College, Pauri Garhwal Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 17 5 Uttarakhand Govt. 17 6 Uttarakhand Govt. aided 17 7 West Bengal Govt. aided 17 8 West Bengal 17 9 West Bengal VCT Kumaon Engineering College, Dwarahat, Dist‐ Almora College of Technology ‐ GB Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar Birbhum Institute of Engineering & Technology, Birbhum Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Private unaided JIS College of Engineering, Nadia Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Private unaided Heritage Institute of Technology, Kolkata Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 11 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 18 0 West Bengal Govt. aided College of Engineering & Management, Kolaghat 18 1 West Bengal Private unaided M.C.K.V Institute of Engineering, Howrah 18 2 West Bengal Govt. 18 3 West Bengal Govt. aided 18 4 West Bengal Govt. aided 18 5 West Bengal Govt. 18 6 West Bengal Govt. aided 18 7 West Bengal Private unaided University Institute of Technology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan Bankura Unnayani Institute of Engineering, Bankura West Bengal University of Technology, Kolkata University College of Technology ‐ University of Calcutta, Kolkata Faculty of Engineering and Technology ‐ Jadavpur University, Kolkata Narula Institute of Technology, Pargnas Page 22 18 8 West Bengal Govt. aided 18 9 West Bengal Govt. aided 19 0 West Bengal Govt. aided RCC Institute of Information Technology, Kolkata Govt College of Engineering and Textile & Technology, Berhampore, West Bengal Murshidabad College of Engineering and Technology, Berhampore, Murshidabad, West Bengal Total no. of institutions that achieved the particular indicator Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 187 162 177 139 126 166 135 156 118 157 174 172 176 Page 23 Annex 4: Update on Results Framework Indicator 2009-10 2010-2011 Target Share of supported programs that are accredited or applied for Percentage Faculty with at least an M. Tech (regular and contract) 30 45 35 45 Actual 22 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-14 2014-15 Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual ** 40 28 45 38 50 52 52 52 (Accredited: 8 Applied :14) (Accredited: 12 Applied :16) (Accredited: 10 Applied :28) (Accredited: 14 Applied : 38) (Accredited: 13 Applied : 39) No. of total eligible programs: 2063 No. of programs accredited or applied for: 447 No. of institutions reporting: 189 85.83 No. of total eligible programs: 2190 No. of programs accredited or applied for: 608 No. of institutions reporting: 189 85.12 No. of total eligible programs: 2344 No. of programs accredited or applied for: 885 No. of institutions reporting: 189 86.08 No. of total eligible programs: 2505 No. of total eligible programs: 2662 No. of programs accredited or applied for: 1374 Total no. of faculty: 17656 Contract‐ 1361 No. of faculty with highest qualification MTech only: 9303 Contract‐564 No of faculty with highest qualification PhD:5851 Contract‐118 50 Total no. of faculty: 19369 Contract‐1780 No. of faculty with highest qualification MTech only:10312 Contract‐724 No of faculty with highest qualification PhD: 6174 Contract‐130 55 Total no. of faculty: 21488 Contract‐ 2540 No. of faculty with highest qualification MTech only: 11851 Contract‐ 1219 No of faculty with highest qualification PhD. 6645 Contract‐172 60 No. of programs accredited or applied for: 1292 No. of institutions reporting: 189 87.42 86 87.86 Total no. of faculty:22324 Contract‐3081 Total no. of faculty:22473 Contract‐3220 No. of faculty with highest qualification MTech only:12536 Contract‐1783 No. of faculty with highest qualification MTech only:12717 Contract‐1978 No of faculty with highest qualification PhD:6980 Contract‐179 No of faculty with highest qualification PhD:7027 Contract‐185 Page 24 Indicator Total number of Master and PhD students 2009-10 30000 Number of publications in refereed journals (within the field of Engineering) 7032 Percentage of Faculty with or pursuing M. Tech and PhD (regular and contract) 63 2010-2011 Target Actual 32000 No. of institutions reporting: 189 34900 7500 No. of institutions reporting: 189 10866 63 No. of institutions reporting: 187 86.79 Total no. of faculty: 17656 No. of faculty with highest qualification MTech only: 9303 No of faculty with highest qualification PhD:5851 No. of faculty enrolled in M.Tech: 169 No. of institutions 2011-2012 Target Actual 2012-2013 Target Actual 34000 No. of institutions reporting: 189 41573 No. of institutions reporting: 189 33000 36118 No. of institutions reporting: 188 8000 15409 8500 No. of institutions reporting: 187 64 86.26 68 2013-14 Target Target Actual ** 40000 18870 14000 2897 88 89.45 No. of institutions reporting: 189 34000 No. of institutions reporting: 186 16801 No. of institutions reporting: 188 87.46 Actual 2014-15 44549 No. of institutions reporting: 181 9000 17946 No. of institutions reporting: 183 73 89.04 Total no. of faculty:22324 Total no. of faculty:22473 No. of faculty with highest qualification MTech only:10312 Total no. of faculty: 21488 No. of faculty with highest qualification MTech only: 11851 No. of faculty with highest qualification MTech only:12536 No. of faculty with highest qualification MTech only:12717 No of faculty with highest qualification PhD: 6174 No. of faculty enrolled in M.Tech : 221 No of faculty with highest qualification PhD. 6645 No. of faculty enrolled in M.Tech: 297 No of faculty with highest qualification PhD:6980 No. of faculty enrolled in M.Tech: 361 No of faculty with highest qualification PhD:7027 No. of faculty enrolled in M.Tech: 359 No. of institutions No. of institutions No. of institutions Total no. of faculty: 19369 Page 25 Indicator 2009-10 2010-2011 Target Actual 2011-2012 Target reporting: 189 Percentage of externally funded research and development projects and consultancies in total revenue Transition rate of all students from the first year to the second year of under graduate study 6 -- 7 48 9.5 Actual 2012-2013 Target reporting: 189 8 9.94 Total Revenue: Rs. 246536 lacs Revenue from externally funded research and development projects and consultancies : Rs.23428 lacs Total Revenue:Rs. 259646 lacs Revenue from externally funded research and development projects and consultancies: Rs. 25813 lacs No. of institutions reporting: 182 59.64 No. of institutions reporting: 180 51 65.61 Actual 2013-14 Target reporting: 189 9 12.8 54 Total Revenue: Rs. 185297 lacs Revenue from externally funded research and development projects and consultancies : Rs. 23722 lacs No. of institutions reporting: 172 65.13 Actual 2014-15 Target Actual ** reporting: 189 10 11.98 11 -- 61 -- Total Revenue: Rs. 204961 lacs Revenue from externally funded research and development projects and consultancies: Rs. 24546 lacs No. of institutions reporting: 172 58 50.69 Total no. of students in the first year: 86772 Total no. of students in the first year: 87637 Total no. of students in the first year: 90512 Total no. of students in the first year: 88198 No. of students who transitioned from the first year to second year: 51749 No. of students who transitioned from the first year to second year: 57498 No. of students who transitioned fro m the first year to second year: 58947 No. of students who transitioned from the first year to second year: 44706 Page 26 Indicator 2009-10 2010-2011 Target Actual 2011-2012 Target 45 45 56.45 48 Total no. of students from Direct Beneficiaries (number) 300,000 300,000 Total no. of student beneficiaries: 349590 Total no. of faculty 61.07 51 No. of students from disadvantaged backgrounds who transitioned from the first year to second year: 23161 No. of institutions reporting: 173 320,000 379,425 Total no. of student beneficiaries:3 56446 Total no. of faculty Actual 2013-14 Target 335,000 59.99 Actual 55 46.31 Total no. of students from disadvantage d backgrounds in the first year: 39292 No. of students from disadvantage d backgrounds who transitioned from the first year to second year:23570 Total no. of students from disadvantaged backgrounds in the first year: 39203 No. of institutions reporting: 171 401,514 No. of institutions reporting: 125 Total no. of student beneficiaries: 376023 Total no. of faculty 2014-15 Target Actual ** No. of institutions reporting: 125 No. of institutions reporting: 171 Total no. of students from disadvantaged backgrounds in the first year: 37926 disadvantaged backgrounds in the first year: 38420 No of students from disadvantage d backgrounds who transitioned from the first year to second year: 21690 No. of institutions reporting: 170 370,581 Target No. of institutions reporting: 173 No. of institutions reporting: 170 Transition rate of students from disadvantaged backgrounds from the first year to second year of undergraduate study Actual 2012-2013 57 -- No. of students from disadvantaged backgrounds who transitioned from the first year to second year:18154 350,000 414,403 Total no. of student beneficiaries:3 87965 Total no. of faculty 395,000 252,197 Total no. of student beneficiaries:2 25591 Total no. of faculty Page 27 Indicator 2009-10 2010-2011 Target Actual 2011-2012 Target beneficiaries: 20991 No. of institutions reporting: 189 of which female (percentage) Percentage of institutions with academic autonomy Number of faculty members that have benefitted from the teaching effectiveness training (under sub- 26 30 -- 26 28 40 Total no. of female student beneficiaries: 97505 Total no. of female faculty beneficiaries :6247 No. of institutions reporting : 189 51 -- Total no. of institutions: 156 No. of institutions with academic autonomy: 80 -- 2012-2013 Actual Target 29 No. of institutions reporting: 189 28 No. of institutions reporting: 189 29 60 Total no. of female student beneficiaries: 108606 Total no. of female faculty beneficiaries: 7900 No. of institutions reporting: 189 58 -- Total no. of institutions: 190 No. of institutions with academic autonomy: 111 187 Total no. of female faculty beneficiaries :6958 No. of institutions reporting: 189 57 Total no. of institutions: 156 No. of institutions with academic autonomy: 89 -- -- Actual beneficiaries:2 6438 Total no. of female student beneficiaries:1 02133 50 Target beneficiaries: 25491 beneficiaries:2 2979 No. of institutions reporting: 189 27 Actual 2013-14 No. of institutions: 70 30 29 2014-15 Target Actual ** beneficiaries:2 6606 30 29 Total no. of female student beneficiaries: 113788 Total no. of female student beneficiaries: 65593 Total no. of female faculty beneficiaries: 8165 Total no. of female faculty beneficiaries: 8244 No. of institutions reporting: 189 65 61 66 Total no. of institutions: 190 No. of institutions with academic autonomy: 115 1000 1210 (c) 62 Total no. of institutions: 190 No. of institutions with academic autonomy: 118 1500 1373 (c) No. of institutions: 164 Page 28 Indicator 2009-10 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-14 2014-15 Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual ** 20 -- 20 -- 20 19 20 19 20 19 component 1.3) Share of TEQIP Supported Engineering Institutions from lagging states as agreed by DEA and World Bank (i.e. Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Orissa, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh)1 Number of governance self reviews received Number of Governance Development plans received Fully functional MIS Number of institutions reporting at least 70% of the indicators 17.7 -- -- -- -- -- -- 65 80 162 (c) 180 177 (c) -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 20 38 120 136 (c) -- -- -- -- -- -- 43 150 156 155 -- 1 At the time of project approval, the indicator on “States lagging in technical education” was defined as those that either have only one Engineering Institution or less than one Engineering Institution per million population as per AICTE’s approved list of Engineering Degree Institutions in 2004. As per this definition, the following states are identified as lagging states in technical education: Nagaland, A&N Islands, Dadra Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, Lakshadweep, Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, J&K, Arunachal Pradesh, Bihar, Chattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Tripura, UP and West Bengal. As per this definition, the actual achievement of “Share of TEQIP supported institutions from States lagging in technical education” is 25%. Page 29 Annex 5: Status of Actions Taken from Previous Joint Review Mission S.N. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ACTIONS COMPLIANCE NPIU to send revised FMR for the remaining FMR for the period from July to Sept., 2014 balance that was not requested by CAAA. submitted to CAAA and disbursement of Rs. 664,304,863 was received on 21.11.14 Institutions that have not met the performance Due intimation was given to the institutions indicators to submit their plan of action for to meet the targets by June 30, 2014. meeting the targets by May 15, 2014 to NPIU, As on 31st October 2014, 178 institutions and are expected to meet these targets by June have met minimum of 8/10 indicators of 30,2014 previous Review Mission Further fund releases are made only to those Being followed scrupulously institutions which have met all 10 performance parameters, as notified to institutions previously. No further fund releases to be made to Punjab No funds are being released to the State of until the issues are resolved Punjab. The State has not released even the 1st installment of funds to 2 Govt institutions (2nd cycle) and 2nd installment to other institutions. This has affected the overall project momentum. A meeting was convened by Education Secretary on 16th September 2014 at MHRD, New Delhi with Sh Rakesh Verma, Principal Secretary, Deptt of Technical Education & Industrial Training. The status of the fund release, expenditure and implementation issues were discussed. It was assured in the meeting that the release of funds will be made within one month i.e. by mid October 2014. A letter from the then Education Secretary was sent to the State Chief Secretary. However, no progress has been observed so far. MHRD to consider providing additional Proposal for the release of additional resources to Institutions which are performing allotment is under consideration by MHRD and could use these resources effectively. A further set of parameters to be given to Institutions performance assessment was institutions to be met by October 31, 2014 carried out on 12 parameters viz.: I. Autonomy obtained or applied for II. MoM of BoG (last 4 Months) published on institution's website III. (a) Governance Self Review Submitted (b) Governance development plan Submitted IV. NBA Accreditation (≥ 50% accredited + applied for) V. Statutory Audit (2013-14) VI. 2nd Performance Auditing/Data Auditing VII. MIS Data Entry Status VIII. Participation in CII-AICTE Survey IX. Participation Faculty, Staff & Students Page 30 S.N. ACTIONS COMPLIANCE satisfaction Survey X. Procurement Plan to cover 100% procurement expenditure XI. 50% of Expenditure against total funds received XII. 100% of Expenditure + Committed expenditure against Total funds received 7. 8 9. 10. 11 12. 13. Review of institutional performance against The assessment analysis is as follows: the set of parameters 12 indicators: 64 11 indicators: 37 10 indicators: 27 9 indicators: 22 < 9 indicators: 40 NPIU in coordination with UGC and NBA to • Share of institutions obtained autonomy review case by case the status of autonomy increased (from 60.5%) to 62.1%, and accreditation with the TEQIP institutions ¾ Autonomous: 118 that have not obtained autonomy status and ¾ Applied to UGC: 44 NBA accreditation. ¾ Applied to Affiliating University: 25 ¾ Not applied at all: 03 • Share of programmes NBA accredited / applied-for increased from 44% to 53% Contract faculty at TEQIP institutions should All TEQIP institutions were advised to be able and encouraged to participate in encourage the participation of Contractual activities in the same way as their colleagues faculty on permanent appointments. In addition, faculty at non-TEQIP institutions should be able to participate, where space permits IITs to develop an annual peer review IIT Mumbai has submitted a report in this mechanism to assess and enhance the regard. effectiveness of the quality circles. This mechanism should be agreed within 2 months IITs to capture evidence about the impact of the examination system on teaching and learning, with a view to feeding into the policy discussions NPIU to organize a workshop on internal quality assurance mechanisms for improving teaching, learning and research in TEQIP institutions, with the view to reporting to the next Mission NPIU to conduct a review of faculty transfers at a sample of government TEQIP institutions, to provide some concrete evidence about the scale of the problem which has been highlighted in several Mission NPIU, working with SPFUs, should organize a review of various diagnostic tests conducted by institutions these tests and identify those that are most effective NBA organized an World Summit on Achieving Excellency through Accreditation wherein all TEQIP institutions were invited Of 53 institutions in 12 States (the entire population of transferable teachers) communicated, reports received from 46 institutions. The entire set of the reports shared with World Bank. 50 institutions sent the information on supporting students need. Out of these, details of 5 institutions sent to world bank. Page 31 S.N. 14. 15 & 16 ACTIONS COMPLIANCE Institutions should consider using MOOCs and 82 Institutions participated in 1st phase of distance learning techniques to compensate for QEEE online courses. And around 100 the lack of adequate faculty institutions are participating in the 2nd phase of QEEE More sharing of good practices and challenges Workshops: among TEQIP institutes • 20th June 2014 - College of Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand • 27th August, 2014 - Bhubaneswar, Odisha NPIU should prepare, with expert guidance as A summary report of the workshops on necessary, guidelines for documenting good improving the transition rate of students is practices. prepared by NPIU. Four regional workshops under the guidance of World Bank were conducted to share the experiences and good practices on improving the transition rate of students in TEQIP-II institutions. Institutions shared the practices used for: • diagnosing the academically weak students; • monitor their progress, • how to improve the transition rate and what key constraints are faced by weak students. 17. Regional Good Governance Workshops should be organized to share experiences across institutions as well as giving guidance for how they can improve their governance and management performance with participation of BoG members, senior academics and staff from the TEQIP institutions, IIMs involved the management capacity building, and SPFUs. Mentors and officials from the World Bank and NPIU guided the institutions for using the best practices for improving the transition rate of students. TEQIP-II Learning Fora - Good Governance, Leadership and Management Programmes were organized from 12-13th, 14th – 15th and 16th -17th October 2014 for all categories of Project Institutions with the objective of enhancing the capabilities of Technical education institutions in India and to support the implementation of good governance practices. Case studies of 2 pilot institutions (College of Engg, Pune & BVB College of Engg, & Tech, Hubli were shared with all institutions for sharing best practices. There was an overwhelming response from the institutions. The participation in the three Fora is as below: 12th -13th Oct 2014: 48 Participants from 27 Institutions + the World Bank Officials: 03, Experts (IIMs) & Pilot Institutions: 13 14th -15th Oct 2014: 48 Participants from 24 Institutions + 7 SPFUs + the World Bank Officials: 03, Experts (IIMs) & Pilot Institutions: 13 Page 32 S.N. ACTIONS COMPLIANCE th 18. 19. 16 -17 Oct 2014: 63 Participants from 40 Institutions + the World Bank Officials: 03, Experts (IIMs) & Pilot Institutions: 13 All the presentations have been sent to the World Bank officials. After receiving their response, the Website will be updated. IIMs have assured to capture the good practices and governance issues through organizing MCEPs at three levels: ¾ Training at Staff level ¾ Training at Faculty ¾ Training at Governance/Administrators The report on Case Studies shall be provided by the IIMs Gather governance and management case studies to identify the regulatory challenges that TEQIP institutions are facing in their effort to improve their governance and management capacity. The NPIU, with expert help as necessary, should develop a methodology for capturing good practice in a consistent, reliable way, which is based on evidence To increase the impact of the leadership and management training, it is encouraged that the IIMs would follow-up with: 1) hands-on institutional capacity building, The Management Capacity Enhancement Programmes (MCEPs) and Leadership Development Programmes (LDPs) are organized regularly by all 7 IIMs (Bangalore, Indore, Lucknow, Kozhikode, Raipur, Trichy and Udaipur). Till date, a total of 994 participants have been benefitted in the training 40 batches (i.e. 36 MCEPs and 4 LDPSs). The details are attached. 2) developing a standard questionnaire to The questionnaire is developed and attached. participants e.g. 3 months after the course to measure impact of the courses and suggest possible follow-ups; and IIMs and NPIU 3) 20. ask the participants to share their institution’s governance self-assessment and governance development plan with the IIM on a continuous basis as this can form the basis for a dialog between the institutions and the IIMs A range of collaborative initiatives in the Management Capacity Enhancement Programme should be organized such as The participants take a copy of governance Self Review of their institution while in the training and IIMs’ expert give their suggestions on it. The common curriculum on strengthening governance and management at TEQIP institutions has been developed and shared with all IIMs, and also available on TEQIP Good Governance website (www.teqipgoodgovernance.org). 1) the development of a joint core curriculum on strengthening governance and management at TEQIP institutions across IIMs including through eLearning courses; and 2) drafting case studies that demonstrate The MCEPs at IIMs are enabling the how TEQIP institutions are seeking to participants to develop an integrated view of Page 33 S.N. ACTIONS COMPLIANCE improve institutional governance and management across functional areas, management optimize resources, make effective decisions and enhance leadership skills and personal effectiveness. A few institutions have reported the benefits from trainings to NPIU. 21. Efforts to build synergies between the Management Capacity Enhancement Programme and the Good Governance Programme under TEQIP should be pursued. This should include the following initiatives: 1) the governance self-assessment Being shared during the MCEPs. questionnaire should be shared with IIMs; 2) the TEQIP Good Governance web-site All IIMs are taking important contents of can be used as a common platform; TEQIP Good Governance web-site and delivers in the MCEPS. the IIMs will be invited to join the IIMs’ TEQIP Coordinators were invited in planned regional workshops on the the Workshops on Good Governance TEQIP Good Governance Programme organized during October 2014. where further synergies can be explored; and 3) 4) 22. 23. 24. Coordination between the mentor activities and the IIMs’ hands-on institutional advisory services to increase the value-added for the institutions. Peer Review process in CoE to be given an important role in guiding the CoEs in focusing on a few research and technology problems that they seek to find solutions to through a well-designed research methodology. 1) more emphasis for CoEs to work with research partners from other research institutions and companies. 2) Development of a dissemination strategy of the research results delivered. A Mentor workshop was organized in the month of July 2014 in which IIMs coordinators were invited for hands-on institutional advisory services to increase the value-added for the institutions. An Academic Peer review of all the 30 CoEs was undertaken on the basis of thematic areas in 9 clusters by the IIT experts and comments were communicated to the institutions. Further, the status report on the progress made by the Centre including the concerns raised and the recommendations made by the Reviewers has been compiled ad will be reviewed during the Mission The Centers are requested to initiate Technology transfer through establishment of Technology Transfer Cells in at least one village in the vicinity for offering real life solutions through technology transfer. NPIU uses the data audit report received to Ongoing activity verify the data in the MIS NPIU to ensure that the remaining institutions A fresh review undertaken for adequacy of (that have not completed the data entry for 4 MIS updated by all 190 institutions: 156 years) should complete the data entry. institutions have updated MIS adequately for all years. Page 34 S.N. 25. ACTIONS COMPLIANCE 26. NPIU to freeze the data in the MIS for 2010- Data (2010-11 and 2011-12) is freeze for 156 11, 2011-12 &2012-13 institutions; upon requests from 34 institutions they are given time upto 31December-2014 to complete the data entry NPIU to ensure that the performance audit 100 PA reports were sent for review. 90/100 reports are reviewed by experts on a regular, reports are reviewed with grading as follows: two week cycle. Grade A: 32 Reports Grade B : 37 Reports Grade C : 21 Reports 27. Budget and Flow of Funds: a. b. c. d. 28. States which have not released funds The status of release of fund by States to for more than 50 days to release the institutions have already been shared with the same immediately and status to be World Bank on 2.12.14 shared with the Bank NPIU have submitted monthly summary of NPIU to share monthly summary of status of flow of funds to the World Bank by status of flow of funds by on 2.12.14 MHRD/states with the Bank FM Indicators Summary for FM indicators have been received from 6 states/CFIs to be shared, including CFIs and 6 SPFUs only information on flow of funds Updated summary of Budget Provision by States to be shared with the Bank Statutory Audit a. Response to Bank’s letter of review of consolidated audit report of FY 201213 Updated summary of Budget Provisions by States sent to the World Bank on 2.12.14 Response to bank’s letter has been shared with the World Bank one on 14th Aug, 2014 and 2.12.14 b. 29. 30. Submit consolidated audit report for The Auditor for Consolidation of Audit FY 2013-14 to the Bank Report for F.Y. 2013-14 have been appointed by NPIU and the work of consolidation is being undertaken. The Audit Reports from 4 CFIs and 7 SPFUs are still awaited and expected to receive shortly. Financial Reporting FMR for the period from July to Sept., 2014 Submit FMR for Apr-June 2014, including submitted to CAAA and disbursement of Rs. forecast for July-Sep to the Bank 664,304,863 was received on 21.11.14 FM Staffing: Vacancy of NPIU FM consultant Interviews are over and issue of appointment to be filled letter is under process. Page 35 31. 32. Training: a. Implement training schedule The new FMRs for IITs and IIMs and also for CoEs have been approved by the World Bank and MHRD and the same are being uploaded in the FMR Software by the software developer. The developer is facing some problem in fitting data in MIS system and assured to resolve the issue at the earliest. Thereafter the training will be undertaken by NPIU. b. Hare module of online training with Submitted to the World Bank the Bank Internal Audit: a. Share status of internal audit in Internal Audit Report from 10 CFIs and 8 states/CFI for 2013-14 SPFUs have been received b. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. Internal audit reports should be Internal Audit Report from 10 CFIs and 8 available for statutory audit of FY SPFUs have been received 2013-14 Disclosure: of FM information as per FM FMR and release of fund details have been Manual on websites kept on the website along with the audit report of 2012-13 Institutions to take the required action to The action were taken but it seems difficult to correct the expenditure gap between the PMSS match the figures of procurement and and FMR finance. Institutions to complete the procurement 189 Institutions have updated their planning for the remaining amount of Rs. 140 procurement plan. During the last review cr. mission the total planning of procurement reported was 865 Cr and till date it is increased to 995 Cr (including consultancy services). Institutions to take required action to initiate The above institutions have initiated the procurement action for the remaining packages in PMSS covering an amount of balance of Rs. 265cr. Rs. 108 Cr. Share the PPR report with NPIU Already shared by the World Bank. Project should submit the details of procurement complaints, if any with actions taken on it for Bank’s review and its closure. Institutions/NPIU to submit the final contract copy with check list for all prior review cases to the Bank NPIU will submit procurement complaints data to World Bank reported till date. Final contract copy for prior review cases has been submitted to the World Bank as and when requested by the World Bank procurement specialist. Four regional workshops have been conducted by the NPIU & World Bank officials and summary report is submitted to the World Bank. Four regional workshops to discuss the implementation of EMF by the institutions (NPIU to take advice from Bank’s Environment Specialist for organizing the Workshop). Project Implementation Plan to be revised, PIP finalized and submitted to MHRD & approved and placed on the NPIU website World Bank for concurrence. Page 36 Annex 6: New Actions to be taken from this Mission S.No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Action By Whom MHRD to contact 17 low performing institutions that have consistently not met the performance benchmarks. Seventeen low performing institutions to meet the 11 performance benchmarks Mentors to provide additional support and guidance to 17 low-performing institutions. Decision on removing low-performing institutions from the project if they are unable to achieve eleven of the October 2014 benchmarks. Pursue recommendation on providing additional resources to well-performing institutions (cabinet approval) A further set of parameters to be given to institutions to be met Review of institutional performance against the set of parameters Conduct next JRM Governance Regularly monitor TEQIP institutions engagement and outcomes of the online course on Good Governance. New Performance benchmark to be included on Good Governance Work with UGC in fast tracking the pending applications Inform institutions the possibility of suggesting 5-6 member’s for the appointment of UGC representatives for the Board of Governors at TEQIP institutions. Good Governance Learning Workshop for CFIs MHRD, NPIU Low- performing Institutions MHRD and NPIU To be Completed by Immediately March 31, 2015 MHRD January 2-31, 2015 April 15, 2015 MHRD, NPIU Immediately MHRD and NPIU April 30, 2015 MHRD and NPIU May 15, 2015 MHRD and NPIU June 2015 NPIU Regularly MHRD, NPIU MHRD, NPIU December 31, 2015 Immediately MHRD, NPIU Immediately MHRD, NPIU February 28, 2015 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Mentoring and Performance Auditing Continue mentoring in its current form MHRD and NPIU Next Performance Audit MHRD, NPIU Publicly disclose the performance audits. MHRD, NPIU Release non-performing mentors and performance auditors Identify additional mentors/ performance MHRD, NPIU Regularly January 2016 Before project closure Immediately MHRD, NPIU Immediately Page 37 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. auditors by contacting IIT Directors Centres of Excellence Two additional on-site visits by the already MHRD, NPIU identified peer-reviewers undertaken during the remaining period of TEQIP II Common evaluation template should be MHRD, NPIU developed in collaboration with the peerreviewers that would be used in the performance assessment of the CoEs Management and Faculty Development IIMs and IITs to develop a proposal to evaluate IITs/ IIMs their programs Remove geographical allocation of TEQIP MHRD, NPIU institutions to particular IIMs and IITs IITs and IIMs to offer their programs to non- IITs, IIMs, TEQIP institutions (and charge an appropriate MHRD fee), subject to no TEQIP participant being turned away Equity Equity Action Plan guidelines to be revised by NPIU NPIU with World Bank guidance Employability NPIU in collaboration with World Bank will NPIU organize a workshop for institutions on good practices in enhancing students’ employability that would inform institutional Action Plans on Improving Students’ Employability both for UG and in particular for PG where placement rates are in general much lower NPIU in collaboration with the World Bank will NPIU carry out a tracer study for TEQIP II Discuss ToRs 29. 30. 31. 32. NPIU to develop placement rates January 15, 2015 Immediately Immediately January 31, 2015 March 2015 September 2015 January 2015 February 2015 Advertise 28. First one in Fall 2015 and second towards end-ofproject. April 30, 2015 guidelines to calculate NPIU Faculty/ Staff and Student Satisfaction Survey Report card for each institution that presents NPIU some of the main messages to the institution in a graphically attractive and useful manner Next full round of Survey NPIU Include an additional question on “overall NPIU satisfaction” in each survey Monitoring and Evaluation Use data audit report received to verify the data NPIU, Data in the MIS Auditors January 31, 2015 February 2015 September 2015 September 2015 Continuous Page 38 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. Freeze the data for 2010-11 and 2011-12 for the NPIU remaining 34 institutions Freeze the data for 2012-13 NPIU Provide hands-on-support and training to NPIU institutes on MIS (especially in institutions with high turn-over in staff designated for data-entry) Project Management Complete recruitment for the vacant positions, MHRD, NPIU including the two positions that need to be advertised Recruit a statistician MHRD, NPIU Empower BoG of institutions that have met all MHRD. NPIU the required performance benchmarks to make effective choices about the use of project funds on international travel Non-TEQIP institutions to be allowed to MHRD, NPIU participate in TEQIP-sponsored activities provided no TEQIP participant is denied participation on account of non-TEQIP participants filling the available spaces. Financial Management 40. Budget and Flow of Funds: 41. a) States which have not released funds for more than 50 days to release the same immediately and status to be shared with the Bank b) NPIU to share monthly summary of status of flow of funds by MHRD/states with the Bank c) FM Indicators Summary for states/CFIs to be shared, including information on low of funds Statutory Audit a) Submit NPIU’s PFS b) Submit consolidated audit report for FY 2013-14 to the Bank December 31, 2014 March 31, 2015 Continuous Immediately Immediately Immediately Immediately Concerned States/MHRD December 31, 2014 NPIU/SPFUs Within 15 days after every month NPIU/States/CFIs December 31, 2014 NPIU NPIU/States/CFIs December 31, 2014 January 15, 2015 42. Monitoring by NPIU 43. a) Share status of appointment of Internal Auditor for SPFUs/ CFIs for FY 201415 b) Share draft format for quarterly reporting by SPFUs/ CFIs to NPIU c) Share draft audit observation compliance mechanism to be followed in future. FM Staffing: NPIU/states/CFIs January 15, 2015 NPIU/states/CFIs January 31, 2015 NPIU/states/CFIs January 31, 2015 Page 39 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. Vacancy of NPIU FM consultant to be filled MHRD January 31, 2015 Share Vacancy status at SPFUs/ CFIs NPIU/States/CFIs January 31, 2015 NPIU, SPFUs, institutions NPIU, SPFUs, Institutions Institutions March 31, 2015 Procurement Review and plan the procurement for the remaining funds available (apprx Rs. 105 cr.) Institutes to plan 20% additional procurement to address materialization factor Review all ongoing contracts and extensions processed accordingly PPR report to be shared with institutions NPIU Submit the details of procurement complaints if NPIU any with actions taken on it to Bank for review and its closer March 31, 2015 Immediately As soon as available Immediately Page 40 Annex 7: World Bank-FICCI Survey on the Employability of Newly Graduated Engineers In 2014, the World Bank and FICCI conducted a follow-up study to the 2009 survey on the employability of newly graduated engineers. The study comprised surveys of 896 companies (response rate of 82.5 percent) and detailed interviews with senior HR executives in leading companies. For the surveys, sixteen main sectors were covered, led by infrastructure (17%), power (14%), automobiles (8%) and oil & gas (7%). The key findings are: 1. Dramatic improvement in employer satisfaction levels: In 2009, only 36 percent of employers were either very or extremely satisfied with freshly graduated engineers. In 2014, 80 percent of employers were either very or extremely satisfied with freshly graduated engineers 2. Improvement in soft skills between 2009 and 2014: The qualitative data reveal that institutes are investing considerably in building the soft skills of their students. While some institutes bring in industry speakers or guest lecturers, others hire behavior coaches. Additionally, many institutes conduct mock interviews and a number of them encourage their students to take the AMCAT to diagnose specific areas of weakness. 3. Other factors explaining the improvement in employability: Relative to 2009, there are far more engineers available for companies to choose as a result of the market slump. In the survey, 96 percent of companies reported no difficulty in hiring. Additionally, companies invest considerably in training new employees, generally through on-the-job methods. 4. Technical skills remain weak: The data indicate that recent graduates have not improved much in terms of their technical skills and problem-solving abilities. Page 41 Going forward 1. Important to keep the momentum on building soft skills. Students should not just be evaluated on outcomes but also their ability to work in teams. Institutes should continue building links with alumni 2. Important to reorient curriculum and assessment toward problem-solving and team-work, with more emphasis on joint activities in the curriculum. Page 42 Annex 8: Procurement Status of Procurement in the project:The status of procurement as planned for the entire period was discussed during the mission. Besides the agreed action plan of last mission was also reviewed. Procurement team of NPIU furnished a current national summery of procurement status under TEQIP II project. All the procurement under TEQIP II is being done through PMSS with very few exceptions and at the end of Nov 14,the expenditure happened under procurement: Rs. 329.77 Crores as per PMSS and Rs. 437.27 cr as per FMS . This Rs. 107 cr difference in both the figures is due to some of the payments are not updated in PMSS by the participating institutions. At the end of Nov 14, contracts worth Rs. 242.83 cr are already committed and for Rs. 135.5 cr worth of cases, the procurement is “In pipeline” i.e at various stages of procurement. Further at the end of Nov’14, it is planned to procure goods worth Rs. 286.98 Crores for which procurement action is yet to be initiated. Therefore total procurement expenditure estimated upto Nov 14 end is 329.77 + 242.83 + 135.5 + 286.98 = Rs. 995.08 Crores (say Rs. 995 Crores). The mission noted that with request from client the project was restructured with reduction of loan amount in project by USD 80 mn due to savings under the project as a result of exchange rate shifts since project approval. Further the project period was also extended for a period of 22 months with revised project end date as 30th Oct 2016. Now the revised loan amount for this project is USD 220 mn. As per project requirement, the maximum procurement allowed for Institutes under component 1.1 and Centre of excellence is 55% of the outlay and that for 1.2 Institutes, the cap is 45%. Taking avg cap of 50%, the total revised expenditure under procurement for the project will be USD 110 mn. Taking US$ conversion rate as INR 60 and Bank reimburse 60% of eligible expenditure, the projected eligible expenditure in procurement will be (110x 6)/60%= INR 1100cr. Therefore there is a clear gap of INR 105cr, which may either be compensated through additional planning of procurement of items by the Institutes or increase in the expenditure under soft component ( i.e other than procurement). Further it is recommended that the institutes should plan 20% additional procurement to take care of materialization factor. With extension in project period, the institutions will continue to do procurement for some more time and for smooth procurement NPIU may plan for training on PMSS for the institutions, where new officials have taken over the charge for the procurement activity. The PMSS was designed to support a decentralized procurement process at the institutional level, while promoting the uniformity, consistency and transparency in procurement process, conducted at multiple institutions. The PMSS is also being used by the SPFUs (State Project Facilitation Unit) and NPIU (National Project Implementation Unit) for procurement as well as monitoring activities. To take care of project extension period, NPIU may review all on going contracts and where ever it is required suitable extension to the contract is processed immediately, so that there is no disruption of activity during the extended period. Immediate attention of NPIU is drawn to the contract with M/s Glodyne techno servo ltd Pune, who is managing the PMSS system. Page 43 Suitable amendment to the contract is made to take care of project extension period. If the amendment amount is more than 15% of the contract cost, then the proposal is required to be submitted to the Bank for review and No Objection. 1) Procurement Post Review (PPR) FY 15: For the PPR FY 14 the PPR report was shared with NPIU and compliance to PPR comments are received from the institutes. Mission was advised by the Project that GPCL, the authorized agency of World Bank has already conducted the PPR for the current FY and they will be submitting their report shortly, which will be shared with the institutions through NPIU for their compliance. 2) Complaint Handling: The mission informed the Procurement staff of NPIU about the mandatory requirement of Bank’s review of the complaints and their resolution. Project to submit the details of procurement complaints if any with actions taken on it to Bank for review and its closer.Mission noted that there was a complaint by one of the supplier regarding non payment of their bills by RTU Kota for several months. During mission visit to Rajasthan, this issue was raised. It was clarified by the institute that as there was no fund released for this activity, the payment could not be made. However the SPFU Rajasthan informed that the fund from MHRD has since been received and the payment is going to be made in a week time. 3) Project was explained about importance of submitting final contract copy with check list for all prior review cases to Bank for getting WBR no. 4) Rating for Procurement: Though procurement activities are picked up in recent past, the cumulative procurement is still less With 57.5% of planned procurement committed, the project has to do a lot to complete all the planned procurement, hence the procurement performance during the period of review has been retained as moderately Satisfactory. Page 44 Annex 9: Financial Management The FM review included desk review of information presented by the NPIU and SPFUs on key FM areas and State visit to Andhra Pradesh. The mission appreciates the comprehensive information prepared by the NPIU on provision of budget, expenditure and status of release of funds. ¾ BUDGETING, FUND FLOWS AND EXPENDITURES: MHRD till date has released INR 2,439 million to the states for FY 2014-15 against budget of INR 4,500 million. As on 4th December 2014, cumulative total of funds released by the MHRD to states is INR 7,307 million, out of which the states have released INR 6,048 million i.e. 83% of the central share. For overall status, refer statement below showing release upto 4th December 2014 and expenditure upto 31st Oct,2014: Release of fund Central Share Expected Matching State Share Expected Institution Share Expected Availability of Total Fund Actual Fund released by State 1,0908.2 2529.7 133 1,3571.1 1,1808 (figures in INR million) Cumulative %age of Expenditure Utilization 8569 73% Adequacy of State Share: The cumulative total of state share released to institutions till 4th December 2014 is INR 1,954 million. During the State visit to AP mission observed that the state has not yet released matching share of Rs. 20 lakhs and Rs. 214.12 lakhs respectively for the last two releases by the MHRD. On the overall the mission is unable to assess the adequacy of release of State and Institute’s respective shares and would request NPIU to share the related data with the Bank. Release of Funds by States: On analysis of the position of the release of funds by States, during the period May to November 2014, it is observed that inordinate time is still being taken by some states. Of the total amount of Central and State share of INR 1,644 million pending to be released by the States, an amount equivalent to INR 747 million (i.e 45%) pertains to releases made by MHRD prior to 30th July 2014, i.e more than 120 days. The related states are namely, Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Punjab, UT-Chandigarh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal. For details please refer to Annex 10. Budget Provision: Review of information on budget provision for FY 2014-15 showed that, in general, the states have provided sufficient funds to meet the forecast of expenditure for this financial year. Information for Bihar, Odisha and NCT-Delhi was not made available. ¾ STAFFING AND CAPACITY BUILDING OF FINANCE AND ACCOUNTS STAFF Staffing: Finance and Accounting Staffing remains an area of concern. At NPIU as against the sanctioned post of 7 personals, there is only one Sr. consultant (finance) and one Executive Assistant positioned at NPIU. It was shared with the mission that some of the vacancies are likely to be filled up in the next two months. During the State visit to AP it was shared with mission that after bifurcation of the state and division of staff between the states of Telangana and AP, the post of Head FM Unit and 2 superintendents were allocated to Telangana.The Head of SPFU, therefore, has additional charge of FM Unit, which comprises 1 Additional Director (Accounts) and 1 Superintendent. Page 45 The mission was informed that a proposal for additional staffing was submitted to the state government, but sanction of additional staff could take several months. On the overall the mission is unable to assess the adequacy of finance and accounts staff across project and would request NPIU to share the related data with the Bank. In addition, the mission would like to re-iterate that substantial vacancies may have led to technically enabled resources being engaged in administrative and accounting functions, thereby leading to in-appropriate utilization of already scarce resources. Staff capacity Building/ Training: It was shared with the mission that after May 2014 no further trainings have been conducted. Moving forward in the quarter ending March 2015 NPIU is planning 3 training workshops on E-FMR and Financial Management. It was further shared that the e-module for training has been shared with the states. However, NPIU was unable to share the status of rolling out of E-training module. ¾ AUDITING AND OTHER ASSURANCE MECHANISMS Effective integration of External, Internal and Performance Audits still remains a challenge. It is re-iterated that any audit should not be seen as a stand-alone activity and the audit cycle should be re-assessed to ensure that the internal audit reports are shared with the statutory auditor in a timely manner. This will enable to maximize the synergistic effect and facilitate effective financial management environment. Statutory Audits: The Consolidated Audit Report for FY 2013-14 to the Bank is overdue for submission to the Bank, due date September 30, 2013. The following table summarizes the status of audit reports for FY 2013-14, as have been received by the NPIU: Particulars Reports Due Reports Received by NPIU Pending Reports States/UTs 22* 15 7 CFIs 25 21 4 NPIU** 1 1 Nil Total 48 37 11 *There are 23 states in the project, but report for Telangana is not due for FY 2013-14. **NPIU: Audit of NPIU was conducted along with audit for Ed. CIL Further, NPIU shared that the Auditor for Consolidation of Audit Report have already been appointed by NPIU and work of consolidation is under way. Internal Audits: Internal audit is the most effective system of internal control particularly for assessing sound financial management system in a program like TEQUIP. Internal audit requirements are still being partially fulfilled by some Sates only. Compliance of Audit Observations: This remains an area of concern. Presently there is no formal audit observation compliance mechanism in place to ensure timely follow-up of the audit observations of each audit. Monitoring by NPIU and SPFUs and FM Indicators: Regular monitoring of FM issues by NPIU and SPFUs is crucial for improving the FM performance of the project. The mission reiterates that NPIU and the SPFUs should implement the system of quarterly submission of information on important areas such as finance and accounts staffing; flow of funds; release Page 46 of states and Institutes’s share of funds; status of resolution of audit observations, financial performance indicators, e-training, interest amounts in project bank accounts; appointment and progress of external and internal audit; etc. It has been agreed that NPIU shall prepare as reporting format and share the same with bank for inputs before dissemination of the same. Further, NPIU should also establish some formal system for addressing issues on account of in-appropriate/ in-eligible expenditures declared by the auditors. Financial Reporting: The mission was informed that E-FMR continues to be implemented partially and IFR submitted to the Bank is based on the excel summaries sent by the institutes and the SPFUs. Further, it was shared that the NPIU is also in discussion with the software developer for MIS for developing a Financial Module integrated with the present MIS. The mission suggested that while planning this module detailed attention should be given to the envisaged information inputs and output requirement and it should be ensured that the present E-FMR system also gets integrated at the time of up-gradation. In addition, it was agreed a time bound road map should be developed on the way forward to ensure on-line transmission of financial information. ¾ RECOMMENDATIONS: The mission would like to suggest the following action points to facilitate strengthened financial arrangements at each level: i. Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Punjab, UT-Chandigarh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal to take immediate action for long pending release of funds to institutes, and NPIU to inform the Bank about the status of releases of all states by 25 May 2014 which have not released funds for more than 50 days; ii. Vacancy of consultant finance at NPIU should be filled at the earliest iii. Pro-active involvement of NPIU, specifically in instances where there are in-ordinate delays in release of funds. This may involve state visits by NPIU. iv. Effective Audit Cycle: Audit reports of each audit should be shared with the other auditors to ensure that the audit issues are appropriately shared and impact fully covered. v. Re-visit the ToR for internal and external audits in consultation with the SPFUs. vi. Formal audit observation compliance mechanism should be in place to ensure timely follow-up of the audit observations of each audit. This may include setting up of Audit Committee at SPFUs. vii. Internal Audit of SPFUs accounts should be conducted on a quarterly basis in such a manner that all the institutes’ are also appropriately covered. NPIU should monitor the status with the SPFUs on regular basis. Page 47 9.10.14 20 days Not released 27.02.14 64 days 26.05.14 26.05.14 64 days 27.02.14 23.12.13 Not released 18.09.14 23.12.13 150 days Not released 150 days 150 days 7.11.13 20 days 7.11.13 7.11.13 34 days 20 days 34 days 34 days 10.06.13 7.05.13 213 days 7.6.13 9.10.14 10.06.13 10.06.13 2 Aditya Institute of Technology & Management, Tekkali 9.10.14 7.05.13 7.05.13 JNTU College of Engineering, Pulivendula, Kadapa 18.09.14 213 days Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College, Chittur 213 days 1 18.09.14 7.6.13 4 7.6.13 ANDHRA PRADESH 154 days 30.7.13 Days Consumed by State Date of Release by State Fund Released (5th Installment) Date of Release by MHRD Days Consumed by State Date of Release by State Days Consumed by MHRD Date of Release by MHRD Fund Released (4th Installment) Request made by NPIU Days Consumed by State Date of Release by State Days Consumed by MHRD Fund Released (3rd Installment) Date of Release by MHRD Request made by NPIU Days Consumed by State Date of Release by State Days Consumed by MHRD Date of Release by MHRD Request made by NPIU Days Consumed by State Date of Release by State Days Consumed by MHRD Date of Release by MHRD Request made by NPIU Days Consumed by State Date of Release by State Date of Release by MHRD Name of the Institution 28.02.13 Name of State 14.12.11 Sl. No. Fund Released (2nd Installment) 90 days Shri Vishnu Engineering College for Women, Bhimavaram 14.12.11 Fund Released (1st Installment) 90 days 3 14.12.11 Annex 10: Summary of release of funds by States to Institutions TECHNICAL EDUCATION QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME (TEQIP) PHASE-II 4.12.2014 Summary of Release of funds by States to Institutions Release of (CoE) Page 48 9 Gayathri Vidya Parishad College of Engineering 10 Gitam Institute of TechbnologyGITAM University, Vishakhapatnam 11 VR Siddhartha Engineering College, Kanuru, Vijayawada 17.08.12 6.2.13 173 days 12.11.13 27.02.14 105 days 26.05.14 90 days Anurag Engineering College, Nalgonda 14.12.11 7.6.13 213 days 21.08.13 18.09.13 28 days 4.3.14 167 days 12 Telangana 150 days 7.11.13 34 days 10.06.13 7.05.13 173 days 6.2.13 167 days 4.3.14 28 days 18.09.13 21.8.13 173 days 6.2.13 9.10.14 20 days Not released 16.08.13 04.02.14 141 days 9.10.14 20 days Not released 28.03.13 30.7.13 133 days 167 days 4.3.14 28 days 18.09.13 21.08.13 213 days 7.6.13 18.09.14 90 days 26.05.14 105 days 27.02.14 12.11.13 163 days 15.10.12 18.09.14 90 days 26.05.14 105 days 27.02.14 12.11.13 144 days 16.7.13 Not released 15 days 10.07.14 25.06.14 90 days 26.05.14 64 days 27.02.14 23.12.13 150 days 7.11.13 34 days 10.06.13 7.05.13 213 days 7.6.13 14.12.11 SVU College of Engineering, Tirupati 14.12.11 8 01.05.12 JNTU College of Engineering, Kakinada 22.02.12 7 17.08.12 6 Andhra University College of Engineering, Vishakhapatnam 17.08.12 5 Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalli Page 49 Nizam Instittue of Engineering & Technology, Nalgonda 18 Vasavi College of Engineering, Hyderabad 150 days 23.12.13 27.02.14 64 days 26.05.14 90 days 19 VNR Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad 01.05.12 15.10.12 163 days 7.05.13 10.06.13 34 days 7.11.13 150 days 23.12.13 27.02.14 64 days 26.05.14 90 days 20 JNTU College of Engineering, Hyderabad 14.12.11 7.6.13 213 days 21.08.13 18.09.13 28 days 4.3.14 167 days 20 days not released 29 days not released 90 days 26.05.14 64 days 27.02.14 23.12.13 150 days 7.11.13 34 days 10.06.13 7.05.13 213 days 7.6.13 9.10.14 90 days 26.05.14 64 days 27.02.14 23.12.13 150 days 7.11.13 34 days 10.06.13 7.05.13 213 days 7.6.13 9.10.14 90 days 26.05.14 64 days 27.02.14 23.12.13 150 days 7.11.13 34 days 10.06.13 7.05.13 144 days 16.7.12 18.09.14 213 days 7.6.13 10.09.14 7.11.13 34 days 10.06.13 7.05.13 213 days 7.6.13 90 days 26.05.14 64 days 27.02.14 23.12.13 150 days 7.11.13 34 days 10.06.13 7.05.13 213 days 7.6.13 14.12.11 17 14.12.11 Mallareddy Engineering College, Hyderabad 14.12.11 16 22.02.12 15 Gokaraju Ranga Raju Institute of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad 14.12.11 14 Chaitanya Bharthi Institute of Technology, Gandipet 14.12.11 13 Aurora's Scientific Technological & Research Academy, Hyderabad 13.06 .13 7.11. 13 147 days Page 50 141 days 04.02.14 29 days 9.10.14 10.09.14 not released 16.08.13 90 days 90 days 90 days 26.05.14 26.05.14 26.05.14 105 days 105 days 105 days 27.02.14 27.02.14 27.02.14 12.11.13 12.11.13 12.11.13 106 days 213 days 213 days 173 days 154 days 17.01.13 232 days Bhagalpur College of Engineering, Bhagalpur 17.01.13 232 days 100 days 26.05.14 7.6.13 7.6.13 6.2.13 Muzaffarpur Institute of Technology, Muzaffarpur 30.05.12 1 30.05.12 Release of SPFU Andhra Pradesh 30.7.13 University College of Engineering, Kakatiya University, Kothagudem 20.3.13 25 11.02.14 Sreenidhi Institute of Science & Technology, Ghatkesar 14.12.11 24 14.12.11 University College of Technology, Osmania University, Hyderabad 17.08.12 23 28.02.13 22 University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad 10.12.12 21 JNTU Institute of Science & Technology, Hyderabad BIHAR 2 Page 51 295 days 295 days 295 days 31.03.13 31.03.14 32 days 31.03.14 32 days Not released 55 days 55 days 90 days 27.02.14 27.02.14 9.6.14 03.01.14 03.01.14 10.3.14 177 days 83 days 83 days 92 days GUJARAT 22.1.13 22.1.13 Lukhdirji Engineering College, Morbi Government Engineering College, Bhavnagar 2 11.07.12 Birla Vishvakarma Mahavidyalaya, Vallabh Vidynagar 31.5.13 1 Delhi Technical University, Delhi 01.11.12 NCT-Delhi 28.02.13 1 31.03.13 & 27.1.14 Rungta College of Engineering & Technology, Bhilai 31.03.13 & 27.01.14 4 Not released Government Engineering College, Raipur 6.03.14 3 11.07.12 CHHATTISGA RH 11.07.12 Government Engineering College, Jagdalpur, Bastar 11.07.12 2 12.09.13 Government Engineering College, Bilaspur 01.11.12 1 3 Page 52 2 University Institute of Engineering & Technology, MDU, Rohtak 29.11.12 350 days 10.12.13 27.02.14 89 days 31.03.14 32 days N.C College of Engineering, Panipat 350 days 10.12.13 27.02.14 89 days 31.03.14 32 days 3 HARYANA 29.11.12 1 14.12.11 University Institute of Engineering & Technology (UIET), Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra Not released 90 days 9.6.14 10.3.14 7 97 days 90 days 9.6.14 10.3.14 92 days Not released 90 days 9.6.14 10.3.14 92 days 31.5.13 6 16.09.14 79 days 9.6.14 21.3.14 350 days SPFU Expenses 31.5.13 28.02.13 Government Engineering College, Rajkot 30.3.13 28.02.13 Not released 90 days 9.6.14 10.3.14 92 days 31.5.13 28.02.13 Government Engineering College, Gandhinagar 29.11.12 Government Engineering College, Patan 1.11.12 & 28.2.13 Not released 90 days 9.6.14 10.3.14 92 days 31.5.13 28.02.13 Shantilal Shah Engineering College, Bhavnagar 14.12.11 5 14.12.11 4 Page 53 1 10.06.13 55 days 19.02.14 252 days 25.2.14 9.6.14 105 days Not released BVB College of Engineering & Technology, Hubli 27.09.13 62 days 04.02.13 129 days 29.3.14 9.6.14 71 days not released 42 days 08.05.13 2nd Instalment Not Released Cambridge Institute of Technology, Ranchi Not released 138 days 9.6.14 21.1.14 128 days 07.05.12 72 days 20.09.14 143 days 9.6.14 2.1.14 117 days 07.10.13 22 days 13.06.13 22.05.13 326 days 14.01.13 22.02.12 Jawaharlal Nehru Government Engineering College, Sundernagar, Mandi 28.03.13 & 2nd Inst. On 8.9.14 17.04.13 KARNATAKA Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 26.07.13 2 128 days JHARKHAND 283 days 1 07.05.12 HIMACHAL PRADESH 22.09.12 1 295 days 29.11.12 06.02.12 32 days 31.03.14 89 days 27.02.14 10.12.13 295 days 29.11.12 06.02.12 Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science & Technology, Murthal Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Guru Jambeshwar University of Science & Technology, Hissar 30.12.11 6 30.12.11 5 14.12.11 4 97 days 16.09.14 52 days 9.6.14 18.4.14 295 days 29.11.12 06.02.12 Faculty of Science, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra Page 54 8 BMS College of Engineering, Bangalore 9 The National Institute of Engineering, Mysore 30.12.11 22.09.12 267 days 26.07.13 27.09.13 62 days 04.02.13 129 days 29.3.14 9.6.14 71 days 10 Basaveshwar Engineering College, Bagalkot 30.12.11 22.09.12 267 days 20.06.13 10.07.13 20 days 09.10.13 91 days 26.2.14 9.6.14 114 days not released not released Malnad College of Engineering, Hassan 237 days 08.04.14 16.8.13 not released 22 days 23.7.14 1.7.14 138 days 04.02.13 28 days 18.09.13 21.08.13 267 days 22.09.12 91 days 09.10.13 20 days 10.07.13 20.06.13 267 days 22.09.12 138 days 04.02.13 28 days 18.09.13 21.08.13 267 days 22.09.12 not released 22 days 23.7.14 1.7.14 86 days 3.06.2014 88 days 16.12.13 19.09.13 267 days 22.09.12 not released 70 days 9.6.14 28.3.14 91 days 09.10.13 20 days 10.07.13 20.06.13 283 days 22.09.12 not released 116 days 11.02.14 17.10.13 283 days 22.09.12 129 days 04.02.13 62 days 27.09.13 26.07.13 283 days 22.09.12 14.12.11 7 14.12.11 6 Sri Jayachamarajendra College of Engineering, Mysore 14.12.11 5 University Visvesvaraya College of Engineering (Bangalore University), Bangalore 30.12.11 4 NITTE Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Bangalore 30.12.11 3 Government Sri Krishnarajendra Silver Jublee Technological Institute, Bangalore 30.12.11 PES College of Engineering, Mandya 30.12.11 2 Page 55 17 SDM College of Engineering and Technology, Dhavalagiri, Dharwad 18 RV College of Engineering, Bangalore 19 PES Institute of Technology, Bangalore 28.12.12 143 days 20.06.13 10.07.13 20 days 09.10.13 91 days 28.11.13 11.02.14 76 days Government Engineering College, Thrissur 14.3.12 74 days 09.04.13 21.05.13 42 days 23.8.13 94 days 19.09.13 27.11.13 69 days 1 58 days 6.08.14 143 days 9.6.14 16.1.14 24 days 21.12.13 KERALA 28.03.13 05.07.13 99 days 28.03.13 05.07.13 99 days 91 days 09.10.13 20 days 10.07.13 20.06.13 143 days 99 days 05.07.13 28.03.13 91 days 09.10.13 20 days 10.07.13 20.06.13 143 days 129 days 04.02.13 62 days 27.09.13 26.07.13 143 days 28.12.12 KARNATAKA 28.12.12 Sri Siddhartha Institute of Technology, Maralur, Tumkur 28.12.12 15 129 days 04.02.13 62 days 27.09.13 26.07.13 143 days 28.12.12 129 days 04.02.13 62 days 27.09.13 26.07.13 143 days 28.12.12 138 days 04.02.13 28 days 18.09.13 21.08.13 143 days 28.12.12 not released 71 days 9.6.14 29.3.14 129 days 04.02.13 62 days 27.09.13 26.07.13 284 days 8.10.12 138 days 04.02.13 28 days 18.09.13 21.08.13 267 days 22.09.12 30.12.11 NMAM Institute of Technology, Nitte, Udupi 30.12.11 14 17.08.12 MS Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Bangalore 17.08.12 13 17.08.12 Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bangalore 17.08.12 12 17.08.12 Siddaganga Institute of Technology, Tumkur 17.08.12 H.K.E.S's PDA College of Engineering, Gulbarga 17.08.12 16 30.12.11 11 Page 56 6 Government College of Engineering, Kannur 7 Government Engineering College, Bartonhill, Thiruvananthapuram 8 LBS Institute of Technology for Women, Poojappura, Thiruvananthapuram 24 days 16.1.14 9.6.14 143 days 6.08.14 58 days 9 College of Engineering Perumon, Perinad, Kollam 06.02.12 26.4.13 79 days 09.04.13 21.05.13 42 days 23.8.13 94 days 11.10.13 11.02.14 122 days 24.03.14 41 days 28.4.14 9.6.14 42 days 6.08.14 58 days 10 College of Engineering, Kidangoor, Kottayam 06.02.12 26.4.13 79 days 09.04.13 21.05.13 42 days 23.8.13 94 days 16.1.14 9.6.14 143 days 6.08.14 58 days 21.12.13 69 days 27.11.13 19.09.13 94 days 23.8.13 42 days 21.05.13 09.04.13 74 days 14.3.12 58 days 6.08.14 42 days 9.6.14 28.4.14 41 days 24.03.14 122 days 11.02.14 11.10.13 94 days 23.8.13 42 days 21.05.13 09.04.13 74 days 14.3.12 58 days 6.08.14 143 days 9.6.14 16.1.14 24 days 21.12.13 69 days 27.11.13 19.09.13 74 days 14.3.12 58 days 6.08.14 143 days 9.6.14 16.1.14 24 days 21.12.13 69 days 27.11.13 19.09.13 94 days 23.8.13 42 days 21.05.13 09.04.13 74 days 14.3.12 58 days 6.08.14 143 days 9.6.14 16.1.14 24 days 21.12.13 69 days 27.11.13 19.09.13 94 days 23.8.13 42 days 21.05.13 09.04.13 74 days 14.3.12 58 days 6.08.14 42 days 9.6.14 28.4.14 24 days 21.12.13 69 days 27.11.13 19.09.13 94 days 23.8.13 42 days 21.05.13 09.04.13 74 days 14.3.12 58 days 6.08.14 143 days 9.6.14 16.1.14 24 days 21.12.13 69 days 27.11.13 19.09.13 74 days 14.3.12 30.12.11 5 School of Engineering, Cochin University of Science & Technology, Cochin 30.12.11 Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology, Kottayam 30.12.11 4 30.12.11 Government Engineering College, Painavu, Idukki 30.12.11 3 30.12.11 Government Engineering College, Kozhikode 30.12.11 2 Page 57 Government Engineering College, Wayand 15 Government Engineering College, Sreekrishnapur, Palakkad 16 College of Engineering, Adoor, Manakkala 17 College of Engineering, Cherthala, Pallippuram 18 College of Engineering, Karunagappally, Kollam 28.02.13 18.4.13 49 days 28.4.14 9.6.14 42 days 6.08.14 58 days 19 Thangal Kunju Musaliar College of Engineering, Kollam 28.02.13 18.4.13 49 days 28.4.14 9.6.14 42 days 6.08.14 58 days 58 days 6.08.14 42 days 9.6.14 28.4.14 49 days 18.4.13 58 days 6.08.14 42 days 9.6.14 28.4.14 49 days 18.4.13 not released 34 days 10.7.14 6.06.14 49 days 18.4.13 58 days 6.08.14 42 days 9.6.14 28.4.14 49 days 18.4.13 24 days 16.1.14 9.6.14 143 days 6.08.14 58 days 16.1.14 9.6.14 143 days 6.08.14 58 days 21.12.13 69 days 27.11.13 19.09.13 79 days 26.4.13 129 days 17.10.13 32 days 10.06.13 9.5.13 79 days 26.4.13 58 days 6.08.14 143 days 9.6.14 16.1.14 24 days 21.12.13 69 days 27.11.13 19.09.13 94 days 23.8.13 42 days 21.05.13 09.04.13 79 days 26.4.13 06.02.12 14 06.02.12 College of Engineering Thalassery, Kannur 06.02.12 13 28.02.13 College of Engineering Trikaripur, Cheemeni, Kasargod 28.02.13 12 28.02.13 Cooperative Institute of Technology, Vadakara, Kozhikode 28.02.13 11 Page 58 5 Shri GS Institute of Technology & Science, Indore 1 Government College of Engineering, Karad 28.06.12 163 days 21.08.13 18.09.13 28 days 03.12.13 78 days 28.07.14 2.09.14 36 days not released BVB's Sardar Patel College of Engineering, Mumbai 163 days 4.12.13 11.02.14 68 days 13.05.14 91 days 21.10.14 7.11.14 17 days not released MAHARASHTR A 2 26 days 25.03.14 78 days 27.02.14 11.12.13 107 days 107 days 30.03.12 28.09.12 Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidhyalaya, Bhopal 30.03.12 & 28.09.12 4 28.06.12 MADHYA PRADESH partly released 29 days 17.10.14 18.09.14 4 days 20.12.13 84 days 16.12.13 23.09.13 107 days 30.03.12 & 28.09.12 14.12.11 partly released 27 days 26.9.14 29.8.14 26 days 25.03.14 78 days 27.02.14 11.12.13 107 days 30.03.12 & 28.09.12 14.12.11 partly released 15 days 30.07.14 15.7.14 26 days 25.03.14 78 days 27.02.14 11.12.13 107 days 30.03.12 & 28.09.12 14.12.11 2 Samrat Ashok Technological Institute (Engineering College), Vidisha 14.12.11 Sagar Institute of Research & Technology, Bhopal 17.01.12 Madhav Institute of Technology & Science, Gwalior 06.02.12 3 17.01.12 1 Page 59 Department of Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur 7 Bharati Vidyapeeth University, College of Engineering, Pune 8 STES's Sinhgad College of Engineering, Pune 9 Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga, Mumbai 17.01.12 28.06.12 163 days 21.08.13 18.09.13 28 days 03.12.13 78 days 30.12.13 27.02.14 59 days 13.05.14 75 days 8.5.14 24.6.14 28 days 9.9.14 51 days 21.10.14 7.11.14 17 days not released 28.03.13 04.09.13 159 days 10 College of Engineering, Shivajinagar, Pune 17.01.12 28.06.12 163 days 06.03.13 21.05.13 76 days 04.09.13 105 days 21.08.13 18.09.13 150 days 03.12.13 78 days 8.5.14 24.6.14 28 days 9.9.14 51 days 21.10.14 7.11.14 17 days not released 28.03.13 04.09.13 159 days 163 days 28.06.12 not released 17 days 7.11.14 21.10.14 75 days 13.05.14 59 days 27.02.14 30.12.13 78 days 03.12.13 28 days 18.09.13 21.08.13 163 days 28.06.12 68 days 08.05.13 91 days 13.05.14 68 days 11.02.14 4.12.13 68 days 08.05.13 not released 36 days 2.09.14 28.07.14 78 days 03.12.13 28 days 18.09.13 21.08.13 163 days 28.06.12 not released 15 days 10.07.14 25.06.14 165 days 13.05.14 54 days 27.11.13 4.10.13 163 days 28.06.12 17.01.12 6 17.01.12 5 University Department of Chemical Technology, North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon 28.02.13 Government College of Engineering, Jalgaon 28.02.13 4 17.01.12 Government College of Enginering, Chandrapur 17.01.12 3 Page 60 17 G H Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur. 17.08.12 11.12.12 116 days 06.03.13 21.05.13 76 days 04.09.13 105 days 21.08.13 18.09.13 150 days 03.12.13 18 Rajarambapu Institute of Technology,Sakhral e, Islampur ,Sangli. 11.12.12 116 days 21.08.13 18.09.13 28 days 03.12.13 78 days 21.10.14 7.11.14 17 days not released 75 days 8.5.14 24.6.14 28 days 9.9.14 51 days 21.10.14 7.11.14 17 days not released 30.12.13 27.02.14 59 days 13.05.14 75 days 21.10.14 7.11.14 17 days not released 13.05.14 59 days 27.02.14 30.12.13 78 days 03.12.13 28 days 18.09.13 21.08.13 163 days 28.06.12 78 days not released 36 days 2.09.14 28.07.14 78 days 03.12.13 28 days 18.09.13 21.08.13 MAHARASHTR A 163 days Govt. College of Engineering, Aurangabad 28.06.12 15 not released 36 days 2.09.14 28.07.14 78 days 03.12.13 28 days 18.09.13 21.08.13 163 days 28.06.12 not released 17 days 7.11.14 21.10.14 51 days 9.9.14 28 days 24.6.14 8.5.14 75 days 13.05.14 59 days 27.02.14 30.12.13 78 days 03.12.13 28 days 18.09.13 21.08.13 163 days 28.06.12 28.03.13 16.08.13 159 days 04.09.13 not released 17 days 7.11.14 21.10.14 51 days 9.9.14 28 days 24.6.14 8.5.14 75 days 13.05.14 59 days 27.02.14 30.12.13 165 days 13.05.14 54 days 27.11.13 4.10.13 163 days 28.06.12 not released 17 days 7.11.14 21.10.14 51 days 9.9.14 28 days 24.6.14 8.5.14 75 days 13.05.14 59 days 27.02.14 30.12.13 78 days 03.12.13 28 days 18.09.13 21.08.13 163 days 28.06.12 17.01.12 Govt. College of Engineering, Amravati 17.01.12 14 17.01.12 Walchand College of Engineering, Sangli 17.01.12 13 17.01.12 12 Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering & Technology, Nanded 17.01.12 16 Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere, Raigad 17.08.12 11 Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute, Matunga, Mumbai Page 61 4.04.14 35 days 4.04.14 35 days not released not released not released 55 days 55 days 95 days 30 days 30 days 27.02.14 27.02.14 26.09.13 3.1.14 3.1.14 27 days 27 days 367 days 27.8.13 11.02.14 not released 26.09.13 Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar 8.11.13 not released 6 27.8.13 28.02.13 294 days 294 days 12.04.12 16.03.12 5 College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana 22.02.12 4 SBS College of Engineering & Technology, Ferozepur 28.02.13 PUNJAB 294 days GZS College of Engineering & Technology, Bhatinda 12.04.12 3 12.12.12 Beant College of Engineering & Technology, Gurdaspur 12.12.12 2 12.12.12 Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana 12.12.12 1 16.03.12 College of Engineering & Technology, Bhubaneshwar 14.12.11 2 22.02.12 ODISHA Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology, Burla, Sambalpur 22.02.12 1 Page 62 College of Technology & Engineering, Udaipur 5 M L V Textile & Engineering College, Bhilwara 30.12.11 30.09.12 272 6 Government Engineering College, Jhalawar 01.08.13 152 days 3 Government Engineering College, Bikaner RAJASTHAN 272 Government Engineering College, Ajmer 30.09.12 2 272 13.08.14 10.09.14 27 days 12.12.14 65 days 10.12.13 27.02.14 78 days 30.07.14 155 days 30.09.12 272 30.09.12 65 days 12.12.14 27 days 10.09.14 13.08.14 272 30.09.12 not released 16.08.13 not released 27 days 04.11.13 8.10.13 367 days 12.12.12 not released 30 days 26.09.13 27.8.13 367 days 12.12.12 14.12.11 University College of Engineering, Kota 14.12.11 1 30.12.11 Thapar University, Patiala 30.12.11 8 30.12.11 Chandigarh Engineering College, Mohali 30.12.11 4 28.02.13 7 Page 63 27.02.14 72 days 2.4.14 37 days 14.3.14 9.6.14 86 days 1.8.14 9.6.14 86 days 1.8.14 52 days 28.8.14 26.9.14 28 days not released not released 28 days 26.9.14 28.8.14 52 days 1.8.14 86 days 9.6.14 14.3.14 1.8.14 86 days 9.6.14 14.3.14 37 days 2.4.14 72 days 27.02.14 17.12.13 108 days not released 17.12.13 14.3.14 108 days 20.02.14 not released 108 days 37 days 20.02.14 34 days 28 days 20.02.14 2.4.14 34 days 04.11.13 01.10.13 140 days 28 days 34 days 72 days 04.11.13 01.10.13 140 days 08.07.13 26.9.14 04.11.13 27.02.14 PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore 26.9.14 01.10.13 17.12.13 TAMIL NADU 28.8.14 140 days 140 days 3 08.07.13 Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai 28.8.14 08.07.13 5 Bharathidasan Institute of Technology Campus, Triuchirapalli 08.07.13 2 not released 28 days 26.9.14 28.8.14 52 days 1.8.14 86 days 9.6.14 14.3.14 59 days 25.11.13 38 days 26.09.13 19.08.13 97 days 26.08.13 76 days 21.05.13 06.03.13 56 11.05.12 141 days 10.01.14 48 days 22.08.13 05.07.13 272 30.09.12 65 days 12.12.14 27 days 10.09.14 13.08.14 152 days 01.08.13 65 days 12.12.14 27 days 10.09.14 13.08.14 152 days 01.08.13 28.02.13 Govt. College of Engineering, Baragur, Krishnagiri 28.02.13 1 30.12.11 Institute of Engineering & Technology, Alwar 16.03.12 9 28.02.13 Government College of Engineering & Technology, Bikaner 28.02.13 8 52 days Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore 28.02.13 Government Woman Engineering College, Ajmer 52 days 4 28.02.13 7 Page 64 University Institute of Engineering & Technology, Chandigarh 2 University Institute of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Punjab University, Chandigarh 27.02.13 10.06.13 105 days 29.08.14 19.09.14 21 days not released PEC University of Technology, Chandigarh 9.5.12 73 days 24.06.13 23.08.13 60 days 4.12.13 24.7.14 21 days not released 13.06.14 91 days not released 98 days 4.12.13 27.08.13 3.7.14 14.03.14 7.12.13 58 days 25.10.13 27.08.13 44 days UTCHANDIGARH TR-II/G-1/1 Tripura Institute of Technology, Narsingarh, Tripura 103 days 3 Tripura 73 days 1 09.05.12 88 days 13.09.13 Manomaniam Sundarnar University,Tirunelvel i 52 days 1.8.14 86 days 9.6.14 14.3.14 56 11.05.12 2.4.14 52 days 14.3.14 9.6.14 86 days 1.8.14 52 days 28.8.14 26.9.14 28 days not released 59 days 14.3.14 9.6.14 86 days 1.8.14 52 days 28.8.14 26.9.14 28 days not released 95 days 11.02.14 8.11.13 60 days 25.11.13 38 days 26.09.13 19.08.13 56 11.05.12 25.11.13 38 days 26.09.13 19.08.13 97 days 26.08.13 76 days 21.05.13 06.03.13 44 days 11.05.12 not released 28 days 26.9.14 28.8.14 52 days 1.8.14 86 days 9.6.14 14.3.14 59 days 25.11.13 38 days 26.09.13 19.08.13 97 days 26.08.13 76 days 21.05.13 06.03.13 56 11.05.12 16.03.12 9 16.03.12 Government College of Engineering, Salem 28.03.12 8 16.03.12 7 Alagappa Chettiar College of Engineering and Technology,Karaiku di 17.06.13 Govt. College of Technology, Coimbatore 29.02.12 1 29.02.12 6 Page 65 147 days 92 days 209 days 28.03.13 not released 7.11.14 196 days 196 days 14.10.14 25.08.14 25.08.14 23.10.13 94 days 03.12.13 8.9.14 17.01.14 not released 27 days 157 days 45 days 78 days 78 days 24 days 09.07.13 9.6.14 14.10.13 7.11.14 12.06.13 12.2.14 11.02.14 196 days 196 days 26.09.12 11.02.14 25.08.14 25.08.14 23.03.12 25.11.13 11.02.14 7 Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, Sultanpur 25.11.13 Bundelkhand Institute of Engg. & Tech., Jhansi, UP 186 days 6 186 days Madan Mohan Malaviya Engineering College, Gorakhpur 26.09.12 5 30.08.13 123 days 186 days 186 days 02.07.12 26.09.12 01.03.12 Institute of Engineering & Technology, Lucknow 23.03.12 4 11.02.14 UTTAR PRADESH Harcourt Butler Technological Institute, Kanpur 14.10.14 3 186 days 2 26.09.12 1 26.09.12 Faculty of Engineering & Technology, MJP Rohilkhand University, Bareilly School of Engineering & Technology, IFTM University, Moradabad (formerly known as College of Enginering & Technology, Moradabad) 23.03.12 Pondicherry Engineering College, Puducherry 23.03.12 UTPUDUCHERRY 23.03.12 1 Page 66 4 University Institute of Technology, Burdwan University 22.02.12 19.7.12 145 days 09.10.13 08.01.14 91 days 26.02.14 49 days 14.3.14 9.6.14 87 days 30.07.14 50 days 5 West Bengal University of Technology, Kolkata 14.12.11 22.3.12 98 days 09.10.13 08.01.14 91 days 26.02.14 49 days 14.3.14 9.6.14 87 days 30.07.14 50 days 3 WEST BENGAL Bankura Unnajani Institute of Engineering, Bankura 49 days 12.3.14 9.6.14 89 days 30.07.14 50 days 14.08.14 10.09.14 27 days not released 11.4.14 9.6.14 59 days 30.07.14 50 days 14.08.14 10.09.14 27 days not released 26.02.14 29 days 08.01.14 10.12.13 63 days 29.11.13 63 days 27.09.13 26.7.13 98 days 22.3.12 32 days 31.03.14 55 days 27.02.14 3.1.14 63 days 29.11.13 63 days College of Engineering & Management, Kolaghat 27.09.13 2 26.7.13 RCC Institute of Information Technology, Kolkata 98 days 1 22.3.12 G.B.Pant Engineering college, Pauri Garhwal not released 27 days 10.09.14 14.08.14 50 days 30.07.14 89 days 9.6.14 12.3.14 49 days 26.02.14 91 days 08.01.14 09.10.13 98 days 22.3.12 not released 42 days 24.6.14 12.5.14 48 days 31.03.14 104 days 11.02.14 1.11.13 180 days 25.09.12 23.03.12 3 14.12.11 109 days 03.12.13 16.8.13 not released 129 days 9.6.14 3.2.14 142 days 05.05.12 14.12.11 College of Technology, GBPUAT, pantnagar 14.12.11 2 UTTARKHA ND 14.12.11 1 not released 42 days 24.6.14 12.5.14 48 days 31.03.14 124 days 11.02.14 10.10.13 236 days 07.08.12 14.12.11 Bipin Chandra Tripathi Kumaon Institute of Technology Dwarahat Page 67 Heritage Institute of Technology 11 Narula Institute of Technology 12 University College of Technology-Calcutta University 14.12.11 22.3.12 98 days 24.6.13 22.08.13 163 days 21.9.13 31 days 12.11.13 08.01.14 57 days 26.02.14 49 days 14.3.14 9.6.14 87 days 30.07.14 50 days 13 Faculty of Engineering and Technology Jadavpur University, Jadavpur 14.12.11 22.3.12 98 days 6.3.13 22.04.13 47 days 6.6.13 49 days 09.10.13 08.01.14 91 days 26.02.14 49 days 14.3.14 9.6.14 87 days 30.07.14 50 days 21.08.13 21.9.13 30 days 6.9.13 85 days not released not released 13.6.13 27 days 50 days 30.07.14 87 days 9.6.14 14.3.14 49 days 26.02.14 90 days 08.01.14 10.10.13 49 days 10.6.13 47 days 22.04.13 6.3.13 98 days 22.3.12 27 days 32 days 31.03.14 37 days 27.02.14 21.01.14 118 days 26.06.13 10.09.14 32 days 31.03.14 37 days 27.02.14 21.01.14 118 days 16.07.13 10.09.14 50 days 30.07.14 76 days 9.6.14 25.3.14 49 days 26.02.14 57 days 08.01.14 12.11.13 49 days 10.6.13 47 days 22.04.13 6.3.13 98 days 22.3.12 14.08.14 50 days 30.07.14 89 days 9.6.14 12.3.14 49 days 26.02.14 57 days 08.01.14 12.11.13 49 days 6.6.13 47 days 22.04.13 6.3.13 98 days 22.3.12 14.08.14 Not released 46 days 24.6.14 9.5.14 49 days 26.02.14 90 days 08.01.14 10.10.13 49 days 26.6.13 47 days 22.04.13 6.3.13 98 days 22.3.12 14.12.11 10 28.02.13 M.C.K.V. Institute of Engineering 28.02.13 9 14.12.11 8 Murshidabad College of Engineering and Technology, Berhampore, Murshidabad 14.12.11 7 Government College of Engineering and Textile Technology, Berahmpore, Murshidabad 14.12.11 6 Birbhum Institute of Engineering & Technology, Birbhum Page 68 Bengal Engineering and Science University, Howrah 14.12.11 22.3.12 98 days 6.3.13 22.04.13 47 days 6.6.13 49 days 24.6.13 22.08.13 59 days 21.9.13 31 days 15 JIS College of Engineering, Kalyani 17.08.12 22.11.12 97 days 24.6.13 22.08.13 59 days 21.9.13 31 days 12.11.13 08.01.14 57 days 26.02.14 49 days 85 days 6.9.13 13.6.13 not released 59 days 9.6.14 11.4.14 49 days 26.02.14 29 days 08.01.14 10.12.13 14 Page 69
© Copyright 2024