Infrastructure, Projects and Contracts Committee 21 May 2015 Total Facilities and Property Management – Award of Contracts. Report by Director of Place Purpose: To consider the award of the contract for the Total Facilities and Property Management project based on the results of the evaluation of the tendered bids. Recommendation: 1. That the Infrastructure Property and Contracts Committee delegates authority to the Head of Property in consultation with the Chair of the Committee to: i. Clarify and confirm commitments made in the preferred bidder’s final tender in relation to the contract and the framework agreement; and ii. Finalise and conclude the contract documentation for the contract and the framework agreement. 2. That the Infrastructure Property and Contracts Committee awards a contract for Total Facilities and Property Management services for seven years with a provision for one or more extensions up to a maximum of a further three years to the preferred bidder subject to commitments made in the preferred bidder’s final tender being clarified and confirmed to the satisfaction of the Head of Property in consultation with the Chair of the Committee; 3. That the Infrastructure Property and Contracts Committee award a framework agreement for Total Facilities and Property Management services for four years to the preferred bidder subject to commitments made in the preferred bidder’s final tender being clarified and confirmed to the satisfaction of the Head of Property in consultation with the Chair of the Committee. Key Points A. In February 2014 the Policy and Resources Committee voted unanimously to adopt a Total Facilities and Property Management (TFPM) approach as its preferred operating model for the future sourcing and delivery of property related services. B. Delegated authority was granted to the Director of Place to commence a procurement exercise to select a commercial partner to deliver a TFPM solution to the Council, subject to a final Award Report being presented to Committee. C. The procurement exercise has now been completed and the award of the contract to the preferred bidder is recommended based upon the results of the evaluation of the final tendered bids. D. The award of the contract to the preferred bidder is also recommended on the basis that its solution fully meets the Council’s requirements, including the need to make substantial savings in line with the Medium Term Financial Plan. E. Information provided by bidders as part of their final tenders is submitted to the Council on a commercial in confidence basis. For this reason, the detailed comparison of final scores, including the financial appraisal, is set out in Appendix B, which is exempt from publication Context 1. The advantages of the TFPM approach were set out and agreed by the Committee in February 2014. Briefly, these are: i.) the opportunity to realise significant savings by rigorously market testing the cost of delivering a wide range of property related services; ii.) the opportunity to realise significant savings by re-structuring propertyrelated services so that they are delivered in the most cost effective manner; iii.) the opportunity to realise management efficiencies and advantages by reducing the number of contracted-out property related services from more than seventy, to just one; and iv.) to realise management efficiencies over the lifetime of the contract by partnering with a leading facilities and property services provider that is suitably incentivised to work with the Council to add value to the property portfolio and / or to jointly identify opportunities to make further savings. 2. The procurement of the TFPM solution was undertaken using the Competitive Dialogue procedure between 07/07/14 and 20/04/15. Three firms were invited to participate in the Competitive Dialogue process. These were: Amey, Bouygues and Cofely. One firm, Amey, pulled out of the process in December 2014, citing resource pressures as a result of winning additional work elsewhere. 3. The two remaining firms, Bouygues and Cofely, participated in an initial round of Competitive Dialogue between 06/11/14 and 18/12/14 and were invited to submit initial bids on 12/01/15. These bids were evaluated and scored by the Council’s project team and comprehensive feedback was provided to both bidders. Following this, both bidders were invited to take part in a second round of Competitive Dialogue between 09/02/15 and 30/03/15 and were invited to submit final bids on 30/03/15. 4. Final tenders were submitted on 20/04/15 and were evaluated by the Council’s project team between 21/04/15 and 11/05/15. The results were approved by the TFPM Programme Board on 12/05/15. Scope of Services 5. The TFPM project encompasses the following service areas Energy Procurement** Post Room / Print* *Not commencing from the start date of the TFPM contract ** Pre Priced Variation Stakeholder Engagement 6. A comprehensive programme of stakeholder engagement has been undertaken since February 2014. This has included the establishment of a staff focus group to enable staff working in the relevant service areas to discuss the project directly with senior managers, regular updates to the Place Directorate Consultative Group, attendance by senior managers at service team meetings to discuss the project directly with staff, briefings by senior managers to union officials, and dedicated pages on the RBK intranet including Frequently Asked Questions and copies of presentation materials used at focus group meetings. TUPE 7. The transition to the TFPM model will involve a transfer of staff working in the service areas set out at paragraph 5 above to the new service provider in line with the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 as amended by the "Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2014". 8. 32 RBK staff working in property related services and 67 staff currently employed by third party contractors have been identified as being in scope of a TUPE transfer to the TFPM service provider. All staff identified as being in scope of a TUPE transfer have been notified and invited to discuss the issues at the Staff Focus Groups. 9. Formal consultation with staff identified as being in scope of the TUPE transfer will commence once contracts have been signed. The consultation will be undertaken in line with the relevant legislation and existing RBK HR Policy. Timescale 10. The table below set out key activities and dates from committee decision through to go live on 1/10/15. Activity IPC Committee RBK Call in period Starts RBK Call in period Ends Issue Standstill Letters Standstill Period Ends Communication Decision to staff Finalise Contract Documents Notify Unison and Chair of DCG Contract Signature Mobilisation Period Starts TUPE Consultation Period Starts TUPE Consultation Period Ends Mobilisation Period Ends Services Commencement Date 21/05/2015 29/05/2015 04/06/2015 05/06/2015 15/06/2015 16/06/2015 26/06/2015 29/06/2015 30/06/2015 01/07/2015 01/07/2015 14/08/2015 30/09/2015 01/10/2015 Legal Implications 11. In compliance with the requirements of CSOs 1-19 of the Council’s Contract Standing Orders the procurement of the TFPM contract has been undertaken in accordance with the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 (as amended) by way of the competitive dialogue procedure. 12. In accordance with Regulation 18(24) of the Public Contracts Regulations the Council concluded dialogue on the basis that it had identified one or more solutions capable of meeting its needs. The Call for Final Tender (“CFT”) was issued on 30th March 2015 and final tenders received on 20th April 2015. The Council proceeded to assess the tenders received and has identified the bidder who has submitted the most economically advantageous tender on the basis of the award criteria specified. As stated in the main body of this report the Council will issue standstill letters on 5th June 2015 providing the unsuccessful bidder with appropriate feedback in accordance with the Public Contracts Regulations. The Council has entered into the Preferred Bidder letter with the Preferred Bidder, who along with the other bidder, was provided with the opportunity to review the letter which was issued as part of the CFT documentation. The Council will proceed in line with Regulation 18(28) to clarify, where necessary, aspects of the Preferred Bidder’s tender and confirm commitments contained in the tender. Risk Assessment 13. Making this decision now, allows the Council to achieve its stated deadline of making the change to a TFPM approach to service delivery on time from the 1st of October 2015, when existing contracts fall away. 14. It also supports the achievement of saving targets identified in the MTFP for the current fiscal year.. 15. Not making the decision now, risks potential disruption of property services should existing contractors be unwilling to extend services and a reduction in savings achievable in the current fiscal year. Resource Implications 17. The Council has budget reductions in the MTFP. The contract price submitted by the preferred bidder exceeds these budget reductions. These are detailed in Part B of this report 18. The Preferred Bidder has proposed a Gain-share mechanism that incentivises them to generate additional income and service efficiencies whilst generating a benefit to both parties. Through their bid the Preferred Bidder has detailed strategic proposals that could generate additional savings/income above the guaranteed savings/income embedded in the fixed contract price. All proposals are subject to Council approval. Equalities Impact Assessment 21. The Equalities Impact Assessment was undertaken as part of the original report to committee in February 2014. This has been reviewed and revised to reflect the contractual requirement on the Service Provider to fully comply with the Equalities Act 2010 and to support the Council in the discharge of its duties and responsibilities under the Act. Background papers – held by Shirin Georgiani 0208 547 5510 [email protected] • • Report to the Policy and Resources Committee, 14 February 2014 Revised Equalities Impact Assessment
© Copyright 2024